History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell

7/29/2019 History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell

1/7

How They Rebuilt Stonehenge

Monday, 1 July 2013

UFO Aliens UK

For decades the official Stonehenge guidebooks have been full ofascinating facts and figures and theories surrounding the world's greatest

rehistoric monument.

What the glossy brochures do not mention, however, is the systematic

ebuilding of the 4,000 year old stone circle throughout the 20th Century.

The restoration has been kept elusive and a large percentage of those

lanning a trip to the monument have no idea that they aren't getting the

ull story."

Right: 17th Century depiction of Stonehenge.Image credit: Wikipedia


2/7

Post-WW1 aerial photograph before 1960s reconstruction.Image credit: Wikipedia

This is one of the dark secrets of history archaeologists don't talk about: The day they had the builders in

tonehenge to recreate the most famous ancient monument in Britain as they thought it ought to look.

This picture shows workers on the site in 1901 in a restoration which caused outrage at the time but wh

rarely referred to in official guidebooks. For it means that Stonehenge, jewel in the crown of Britain

heritage industry, is not all it seems. Much of what the ancient site's millions of visitors see in fact dates

less than 50 years.

rom 1901 to 1964, the majority of the stone circle was restored in a series of makeovers which have le

n the words of one archaeologist, as 'a product of the 20th century heritage industry'. But the informatiomarkedly absent from the guidebooks and info-phones used by tourists at the site Coming in the wake o


3/7

tonehenge has caused embarrassment among archaeologists. English Heritage, the guardian of the

monument, is to rewrite the official guide, which dismisses the Henge's recent history in a few words. D

Batchelor, English Heritage's senior archaeologist said he would personally rewrite the official guide. 'T

etail was dropped in the Sixties', he admitted. 'But times have changed and we now believe this is an

mportant piece of the Stonehenge story and must be told'.

Cambridge University archaeological archivist and leading Stonehenge author Christopher Chippindale

dmitted: 'Not much of what we see at Stonehenge hasn't been touched in some way'. And historical res

tudent Brian Edwards, who recently revealed that the nearby Avebury Monument had been totally rebu

as found rare pictures of Stonehenge being restored. He said: 'It has been as if Stonehenge had been

istorically cleansed'. 'For too long people have been kept in the dark over the Stonehenge restoration w

m astonished by how few people know about it. It is wonderful the guide book is going to tell the full s

n the future.'

Image from the 1954 reconstruction


4/7


A million visitors a year are awe-struck as they look back in time into another age and marvel at the prim

echnology and muscle-power which must have been employed transporting the huge monoliths and raishem on Salisbury Plain. They gasp as they are told about this strangely spiritual site.... mankind's first

omputer, its standing stones and precise lintels, lining up magically and mysteriously with the heavens

bove and the solstice suns.


5/7

An early photograph of Stonehenge taken July 1877.Image credit: Wikipedia

But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological controversy - and following interest displayed

istorical researcher Brian Edwards and a local newspaper, the brochures will be re-written, to include th

forgotten years'. The years when teams of navvies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the British Empire to

oist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the hu

arsens. As Mr Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology following revelations that

earby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says: 'Wh

ave been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT haveen like thousands of years ago. It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of

rehistoric people. What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old.'


n archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite. English Heritage run Stonehenge

ehalf of the nation, and an English Heritage insider revealed: 'Dark forces were at work in the 70s, whe

ecision was taken to drop the information about the restorations Now that is about to change.'

The Restoration and Rebuild

The first restoration of Stonehenge was launched 100 years ago this year.

And, in 1901, as the builders went to work, The Times letters column was full of bucolic missives ofomplaint But the first stage of 'restoration' thundered ahead regardless and the style guru of the day Jo


6/7

tonehenge makeover was to gather momentum and more work was carried out in 1919, 1920, 1958, 19

nd 1964. Christopher Chippindale, curator at the Cambridge University Museum of Archaeology and

Anthropology and Anthropology, and author of Stonehenge Complete, admits: 'Nearly all the stones hav

een moved in some way and are standing in concrete.'

A stone was straightened and set in concrete in 1901, six further stones in 1919 and 1920, three more in

nd four in 1964. There was also the excavation of the Altar stone and re-erection of the Trilithon in 195


The guide book 'Stonehenge and Neighbouring Monuments' , and the audio tour of the Henge omit any

omprehensive mention of the rebuilding in the 20th Century. Only on page 18 is there a slight reference

umber of the leaning and fallen stones have been straightened and re-erected.' But even that official gu

ook does not contain clues to the large scale restoration, which was not deemed worth a full entry.


7/7

Why does John Constable's 1835 painting of the Henge on pages 18 and 19 look so vastly different from

atter-day pristine photograph across pages 28 and 29? REASON: A lot of restoration work had taken p

n between the two images being recorded. And, during long hot summers it would be possible - if one c

et near to the stones - to see the turf peeling back to reveal the concrete boots into which the majority o

tones are now set. A dead give-away, but difficult to spot now as proximity to the Henge is limited.

One wonders how an event as massive as the resurrection of a worldly monument such as Stonehenge w

without notice. Today, it is rare to stumble upon any mention of the reconstruction of the historic monum

eople like having clear guidelines that are followed, like those at an online casino where there is no roo

misunderstandings. If the reconstruction of Stonehenge was made clear to the public it would only add t

istorical value.


Our pictures clearly show the rebuilding in progress. Some were discovered by Mr Chippendale and we

sed in a revised edition of his book. Many of those have since been lost. Others were found by Mr Edw

who unearthed guide books from the time when Stonehenge was not ashamed of its past and featured

hotographs and stories of the restorations.

The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England.

Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one

utside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if peopl

othering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true

tory.'

art of this article was written by Roger Taverner and originally featured in 'The Western Daily Press'

/1/2001.

ictures appear courtesy of The Wiltshire Archeological Society and Christopher Chippindale.

li i

History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell

Documents

Transcript of History - Stonehenge - How They Rebuilt Stonehenge - And Didn't Tell