Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

24
Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA August 14-17, 2010 Rose M. Kreider, U.S. Census Bureau Diana B. Elliott, U.S. Census Bureau 1

description

Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009. American Sociological Association Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA August 14-17, 2010 Rose M. Kreider, U.S. Census Bureau Diana B. Elliott, U.S. Census Bureau. Background. The stay-at-home mother is relatively new concept: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Page 1: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

American Sociological Association Annual Meeting

Atlanta, GA

August 14-17, 2010

Rose M. Kreider, U.S. Census Bureau

Diana B. Elliott, U.S. Census Bureau

1

Page 2: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Background

The stay-at-home mother is relatively new concept: - - Post WW II prosperity provided jobs to married

men and wages adequate to support a family- - Cultural values focused on family, coupled with

stratified and gendered spheres of work and family- - Over the last 40 years, employment of married

women with young children has been on the rise

2

Page 3: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Background

The opt-out debate:- - Media outlets proclaimed a growing trend of high

achieving married, working women “choosing” to leave the labor force to raise children

- - Probably not a choice, but a result of the struggles to balance work and family

- - Recent data show stay-at-home mothers are not primarily high achieving professionals, but are often foreign-born, Hispanic, and younger women with less education

3

Page 4: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Research needsThe cultural and historical changes over the last 40

years suggest that in addition to the decline in the proportion of married mothers who stay at home, who they are has also changed – it’s a more selective group now.

There is a need for a historical understanding of who stay-at-home mothers were and who they are now, relative to other married women with children who are in the labor force.

4

Page 5: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Research questions

How has the proportion of married mothers who stay at home changed since 1969?

With a lower proportion of married women with children staying home in recent years, how do they differ from their non-stay-at-home counterparts? How has the composition of this group changed over the last 40 years?

5

Page 6: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Data and Methods

Data:

March supplement of the Current Population Survey (CPS), also known as the Annual Social and Economic Supplement--ASEC

(1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009)

Sample:

Married couples (that include the householder) with own children under 15 in the household

6

Page 7: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Data and Methods

Definition of stay-at-home mothers (DV):

Those wives who report being out of the labor force all last year while their husbands report being in the labor force all last year (50 or more weeks)

7

Page 8: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Data and Methods

Independent variables:

Wife’s characteristics: Age, Education, Race, Hispanic origin, Nativity

Couple characteristics: which spouse has more education

Household characteristics: Female adult relative present, number of children under 5 present

8

Page 9: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Data and Methods

Analysis:

Descriptive table shows stay-at-home mothers’ characteristics compared to other mothers for each decade

Logistic models predict the likelihood of being a stay-at-home mother over time with main effects and interactions by year of survey.

9

Page 10: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

Percent of married couple households with stay-at-home mothers: 1969 to 2009

10

Page 11: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who are age 15 to 24: 1969 to 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 11

Page 12: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who have less than a high school degree: 1969 to 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 12

Page 13: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who have a bachelor’s degree or more: 1969 to 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 13

Page 14: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who were Hispanic: 1979 to 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

14

Page 15: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who were foreign born: 1999 and 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1999, 2009

15

Page 16: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Percent of stay-at-home and other mothers who were Hispanic and foreign born: 1999 and 2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1999, 2009

16

Page 17: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Main effects model 1969-2009

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

-Smaller proportion of stay-at-home mothers in later years (but odds ratios in 2009 are not as low as 1989 and 1999)

More likely to be a stay-at-home mother:

-Woman has less than a HS education – 1.3x more likely to stay home than those with a HS degree

- Husband has more education – 1.2x more likely to stay home than those who have same education-- Two or more children under 5 – 2.8x more likely to stay home

17

Page 18: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Main effects model 1969-2009

Less likely to be a stay-at-home mother:

- Under 35 years old (.57 age 15-24; .81 age 25-34)

- Bachelors or higher – less likely (.77) than those with HS degree

- Black women – less likely (.48) than White women-- Wife has more education – less likely (.72) than couples with the same level of education

- Female adult relative present – less likely (.91) to stay home

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009 18

Page 19: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Main effects model 1979-2009

Results for the 1979-2009 model are similar to those for the 1969-2009 model.

- Hispanic women – 1.4x more likely to stay home than White non-Hispanic women

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

19

Page 20: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Interaction effects model (1969 to 2009)

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

Three findings of note:

Age: in 1989, 1999, 2009, younger mothers (age 15-24) more likely to stay home than younger mothers in 1969 and 1979

Education: for 1979 and later, women with less than a high school degree were more likely to stay at home than those with less than HS in 1969.

Hispanic: Relative to White non-Hispanic women, Hispanic women more likely to stay at home in later decades than in 1979

20

Page 21: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Predicting whether married mothers stay at home: Interaction effects model (1969 to 2009)

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

Couple/Household characteristics:

One or more children under 5: Regardless of the survey year, women with young children were more likely to stay at home (1969-2009 model). Interaction terms don’t change the story.

Spousal education differentials: In the model that controls for Hispanic, in 1999 and 2009, mothers with more education than their husbands were less likely to stay home than similar mothers in 1979.

21

Page 22: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

22

1979 1989 1999 20090

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Predicted percentage of stay-at-home mothers, for selected groups, 1979 to 2009

Young women 15-24, lt HS, Hispanic

Bachelors+, 35+, White

Each of the groups of women have the same education as their husband, have no female adult relatives present, and have one child under 5.Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

Page 23: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Conclusion

Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009

While the proportion of married mothers who were stay-at-home moms declined significantly from 44 percent in 1969 to 26 percent in 2009, the relationship between stay-at-home mothers and particular demographic, socioeconomic, and family compositional variables changed over this time period so that the following women now have higher odds of being a stay-at-home mothers now than earlier in the 20th century:

- - younger;- - less educated; and- - Hispanic.

23

Page 24: Historical Changes in Stay-at-Home Mothers: 1969 to 2009

Contact InformationRose M. Kreider

Fertility and Family Statistics Branch

U.S. Census Bureau

[email protected]

Diana B. Elliott

Fertility and Family Statistics Branch

U.S. Census Bureau

[email protected]

NOTE: The estimates in this paper are based on responses from a sample of the population and may differ from actual values because of sampling variability or other factors. As a result, apparent differences between the estimates for two or more groups may not be statistically significant. All comparative statements have undergone statistical testing and are significant at the 90-percent confidence level unless otherwise noted. Further information about the source and accuracy of the estimates is available at: http://www.census.gov/apsd/techdoc/cps/cps-main.html

24