Hinode/SOT Observations of Quiescent Prominences
-
Upload
dacey-cameron -
Category
Documents
-
view
41 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Hinode/SOT Observations of Quiescent Prominences
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Hinode/SOT Observations of Quiescent Prominences
Thomas Berger, T. Tarbell, N. Hurlburt, B. Lites, R. Shine, G. Slater, A.Title, S. Tsuneta, J. Okamoto, K. Ichimoto, Y.
Katsukawa, M. Kubo, S. Nagata, T. Shimizuand the rest of the SOT Team
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Hinode Overview
SOTSolar Optical Telescope
XRTX-ray Telescope
EISExtreme Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrometer
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
HDM (Heat Dump Mirror)
CLU (collimator Lens Unit)
PMU (Polarizaiton Modulator Unit)
Tip-tilt mirror
SOT Overview
Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA):• 0.5 m Gregorian Telescope• Built by NAOJ/JAXA/Melco
Focal Plane Package (FPP):• Broadband Filter Imager (BFI)• Narrowband Filter Imager (NFI)• Spectropolarimeter (SP)• Built by Lockheed/HAO• Cameras by E2V/RAL
Introduction
Focal Plane Package (FPP)
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Introduction• Hinode/SOT images prominences above the solar limb in two wavelengths:
• Ca II H-line at 396.8 nm 0.054”/pix
• H Balmer Alpha line at 656.3 nm 0.08”/pix
• Spatial resolution determined by 2x2 pixel summing. 2-pixel resolution is:
• Ca H-line ~ 160 km
• H-alpha ~ 230 km
• Typical temporal resolution values are 30--60 sec (15--30 sec cadence).
• SOT telescope is diffraction limited with no seeing distortions.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ca II H-line 396.8nm30-Nov-2006NW limb 6 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Sample RegionsTS1, TS2 = horizontal time slicesBox = averaged vertical time slice
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Horizontal Time Slices
TS2
TS1
Oscillations of unknown origin
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Vertical Composite Time Slice16 1-pixel slices summed horizontally
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Vertical Composite Time Slice16 1-pixel slices summed horizontally
1 2
34
56
78
v1 = 8.9 km/sv7 = 9.3 km/sv8 = 8.9 km/s< v > = 9.0 km/s
v2 = 12.2 km/sv3 = 19.2 km/sv4 = 12.6 km/sv5 = 11.9 km/sv6 = 8.9 km/s< v > = 12.9 km/s
Downflows Upflows
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Example Vortex CloseupGrid = 2”
2.5 RotationsRate = 3.27 x 10-3 rad/sec
~3000 km diameter
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Upflow Plumes CloseupGrid = 2”
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
656 658 660 662 664 666
1
2
3
v1 = 7.1 km/sv2 = 14.2 km/sv3 = 19.9 km/s
Upflow Plume Structure & Velocity Estimates34 sec between frames
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
668 670 672 674 676 678
3
v3 = 14.4 km/s
Upflow Plume Structure & Velocity Estimates34 sec between frames
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
680 682 684
7500
km
Upflow Plume Structure Detail34 sec between frames
4
v4 = 26.3 km/s
2250 km
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Plume Velocity Measurements
v = 23 km/s v = 21 km/s
v = 18 km/s
v = 23 km/s
a = -0.18 km/s2
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Downflow Stream CloseupGrid = 2”
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
H- Line center 656.3nm25-April-2007SW limb (rotated) 5 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
H-alpha 656.3nm8-Aug-2007NE limb 4 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ca II H-line 396.8nm16-Aug-2007NW limb 5 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
H-alpha 656.3nm16-Aug-2007NW limb 5 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aGIF decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ca II H-line 396.8nm03-Oct-2007NW limb 5 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
H-alpha 656.3nm +408 mA03-Oct-2007NW limb
408 mA ~ 20 km s-1
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Examples of non-plume forming prominences:
• Quiescent prominences with little or no discernible vertical motions:• 23 December 2006• 11-12 July 2007• 4-5 August 2007
• Active region prominences• 9 November 2006 (Okamoto prominence)• 18 December 2006• 9 February 2007
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ca II H-line 396.8nm23-Dec-2006NW limb 16 hrs. w/gap
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ca II H-line 396.8 nm12-July-2007NE limb 4 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Ca II H-line 396.8 nm5-Aug-2007NW limb 6 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Active Region 10922Ca II H-line 396.8 nm9-Nov-2006W limb 1 hr.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Active Region 10930Ca II H-line 396.8 nm18-Dec-2006W limb 6 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
QuickTime™ and aPhoto - JPEG decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Active Region 10940Ca II H-line 396.8 nm18-Dec-2006W limb 10 hrs.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Findings• Two appearances of quiescent prominence structures in Hinode/SOT database:
• “Sheet” or “Hedgerow” prominences with ubiquitous vertical motion.
• “Horizontal” prominences w/ no obvious vertical motion.
• Sheet prominences always show the presence of upflow plumes, downflow streams, and large-scale vortices. There is no such thing as a static sheet prominence.
- Dark upflow “plumes” are intermittent, < V > ~ 20 km/sec, 10 minute characteristic lifetime, 400 - 700 km width.
- Bright downflow “streams”, < V > ~ 10 km/sec, 10 min characteristic lifetime, 250 - 700 km width.
- Vortices, characteristic scale 103 km, 3x10-3 rad/sec
- Rotational endpoint structures
- Bright “support arches” ~5000 km above photosphere
- Arches “break” under the weight of accumulated plasma
• Horizontal prominences always show horizontal flows on “shorter” disjoint fibrils.- Very little or no vertical motions - “vertically static”.- No obvious plume formation.- All AR prominences seen so far appear “horizontal” in structure.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
Hypotheses
• What causes the dark buoyant upflows?
• 1. Thermal plume hypothesis: the upflow plumes are caused be localized heatings in the photosphere at the magnetic neutral line. The source of the heating is magnetic reconnection at the cancellation sites of larger magnetic elements.
The heating causes a density deficit relative to the surrounding plasma. This causes the heated volume to rise adiabatically in the form of a thermal plume. Flow character is turbulent and does not appear to follow magnetic field lines.
The constant rise speed of the plumes implies that the bouyancy force is balanced by fluid dynamic and/or magnetohydrodynamic “drag” forces. Assuming only fluid dynamic drag, a characteristic size R = radius of spherical “bubble”, and a unity drag coefficient:
=
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
• 1. Thermal plume hypothesis: (cont.)
Hypotheses
Assuming a perfect gas in pressure equilibrium
Using g = 274 m s-2, v = 20,000 km s-1, T = 7000 K, and R = density scale height at T(7000) = 300 km,
Temperature in plumes ~60,000K - sufficiently hot to reduce level populations necessary for scattering of Ca II and H-alpha radiation.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
• 1. Thermal plume hypothesis: (cont.)
Hypotheses
Note: the foregoing assumes plume kinetic energy density >> magnetic field pressure. i.e. this is a high-Beta plasma “in the corona”.
Low & Hundhausen, ApJ, 443, 818, 1995.
Given the density of prominence plasma (ne ~1011 cm-3), this can only happen where B ~ 0.
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
• 1. Thermal plume hypothesis: (cont.)
Hypotheses
A really wild idea: These thermal plumes exist everywhere where there is magnetic reconnection in the lower atmosphere.
I.e., the prominence material simply makes the plumes visible by their inability to scatter chromospheric radiation.
Either you heard it here first...
or I will plausibly deny ever having said this...
PROM 2007 Workshop Monday 29-October-2007
• 2. Magnetic Bubble hypothesis: (courtesy B.C. Low) We suppose that magnetic reconnection in the photosphere results in highly evacuated magnetic “bubbles” that rise through the prominence due to the density deficit caused by the magnetic field energy density.
Hypotheses
In this case, both the Lorentz force and fluid dynamic drag resist the bouyancy force of the “bubble”.
The temperature of the bubble remains at ambient temperature. The plumes are dark because the density is so low that chromospheric Ca H-line and H-alpha radiation are no longer efficiently scattered in the plumes.
A really wild idea: These magnetic bubbles exist everywhere where there is magnetic reconnection in the lower atmosphere. They are just made visible by prominences...
Either you heard it here first...
or I will plausibly deny ever having said this...