(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps...

(High/Middle School)(High/Middle School)HSTW/MMGWHSTW/MMGW Site Presentation Site Presentation

((Month Date, 2006)Month Date, 2006)

(High/Middle School)(High/Middle School)HSTW/MMGWHSTW/MMGW Site Presentation Site Presentation

((Month Date, 2006)Month Date, 2006)Promising PracticesPromising Practices

Next StepsNext Steps

Major ChallengesMajor Challenges

Technical Review Visit (TRV)

Our School(Customize – example only) We are a 7th & 8th Grade Middle School

with just over 500 students Sending Elementary Schools: Receiving High Schools: 2006 School’s Performance Rating: AYP Status:

Our Faculty/Staff(Customize – example only)

Administrators: Faculty: Staff/Aides/Paraprofessionals: Counselors: # Highly Qualified: # Elementary/Middle School Certified: # High School Certified:

STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICSKey: (Customize) A=African American, W=White, Other=O,

ED=Economically Disadvantaged, SN=Special Needs, ESL= English as Second Language

Grade Total F M

SingleParentHome

sA W O ED SN ESL

7

8

NT Non-

Tested

Total#

%

DAILY SCHEDULE(A/B)

Key: HR = Home Room (Customize)

Grade

HR7:50-7:58

1st

7:58- 8:48

2nd 3rd 4th HR

7 ELA Math

8

SN

DSTP Extra Help

Closing the Achievement Gap

AYP Proficiency Comparisons

OverallSchool

Spring ‘05

Spring ‘06

AYP Status

Reading

Math

L.A.

’05 AYP Reading –%’05 AYP Math –%

’06 AYP Reading –%’06 AYP Math –%

NCLB

Sub-Group ComparisonsOverall School

Spring ’05

Reading

Spring ’06

Reading

+ or – AYP met

For ‘06

Spring ’05

Math

Spring ’06

Math

+ or – AYP met

For ‘06

White 78.9%

88.6% +9.7yes

80% 82.6% +2.6yes

Hispanic 52.8%

62.5% +9.7yes

58.2% 64.4% +6.2yes

SWD 6.5% 28.5% +22yes

22.2% 23.8% +1.6No

Limited English

Speaking

36% 32.8% -3.2No

46.6% 41.7% -4.9No

Econ Dis. 60.7%

73.9% +13.2yes

61.5% 68.3% +6.8yes

Closing the Achievement Gap85 percent of students to perform at the basic level

with increasing numbers performing at the proficient and advanced levels on the HSTW/MG Assessment

2006 HSTW/MG Assessment Results Compared to High Scoring Sites

Meeting Goal

2006Site

2006High

Scoring

Site

% Gap(-/+)

2008HSTW/MGAGoal

2006%

Gap(-/+)

Reading

Mathematics

Science

Source: 2006 HSTW/MG Assessment

Closing the Achievement GapAll students to perform at proficient on the OAT/OGT

2006 OAT/OGT Results Compared to State Goal

(Customize)

AllStudents

AfricanAmerican

White Students With

Disabilities

Economically Dis-

advantage

06 Gap +/-

06 Gap +/-

06 Gap

+/-

06 Gap +/-

06 Gap +/-

Reading

Writing

Math

Science

Citizenship/Social Studies

Source: 2006 Ohio State Report Cards Gap Calculations: +/- for each group compared to the state goal

Goal # 1Rigorous Academics

(Customize – Examples only)

What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”

OAT/OGT scores are up. (School), for the past several years, has shown an increase in proficiency scores by overall school results.

Most content areas have district adopted guides and maps in place and share common assessments.



What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”

Require all teachers post objectives on the board and students write in their agendas. Quality student work is displayed.



Why We Need to Address This Goal Data shows students not meeting state, federal and HSTW/MMGW standards. Have not eliminated the general track. Not teaching all students to rigorous academic standards. Not requiring reading and writing in all classes. Not requiring all 7th graders to take pre-algebra and all 8th graders Algebra I.

Goal #2High Expectations/Extra

Help(Customize – Examples only)


Higher Expectations (Effort, Pride, Respect)

All parents are notified if students drop to a “D” or below.

Reduced Tardy Rate as a result of higher expectations & effective consequences (lunch detention).



What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Academic Assembly Homework policy Required in school extra help for

students earning a D or F



Why We Need to Address This Goal

Low attendance Rate.High Promotion/Low Retentions of

low performing students.No policy for revision of work until it

meets standards.Homework policy is not enforced.Summer School Program is needed.

Goal #3 Active Student Engagement



Most teachers are practicing on a regular basis best instructional practices. Staff implements many hands-on activities that are thought provoking and promotes higher order thinking.

Goal #3 Active Student Engagement


What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Provide all staff with professional

development on Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) to improve instruction.

Goal #3 Active Student

Engagement(Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal Not using students’

strengths/challenges to plan instruction and curricular experiences.

Not providing time for teachers to develop integrated projects with a written paper, oral presentation, product or service.

Goal #4Guidance/Advisement



Students lead parents during P/T Conferences.



What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Require all 8th/9-12th to develop a five-

year plan and review it annually with advisors, teachers and parents.

Explore successful advisor/advisee programs at high performing HSTW/MMGW sites.



Why We Need to Address This Goal No strategies in place to provide career

exploration for all students. No requirement of a five-year plan early in the

eighth grade year that includes parental involvement/annual review by students, parents and teachers in grades 9 - 12.

No structured adviser/advisee program. Low parent conference participation rates. Little evidence of open & frequent

communication with parents.

Goal #5Climate of Continuous

Improvement(Customize – Examples only)


All departments share and analyze data to guide instruction. (Friday Department Meetings)

Active Leadership Team



What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps” Professional Development

1. Continued implementation of best instructional practices.

2. Introduce Differentiated Instruction3. Implement Literacy Plan: Classroom

strategies in vocabulary, word analysis & comprehension.



Why We Need to Address This Goal Not all staff are participating on school

improvement focus teams. Inconsistent use or analysis of data by all

staff to adjust instruction. Irregular monitoring of classroom

instruction to observe and support ongoing improvements in teaching & learning.

(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps...

Documents

Transcript of (High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps...