Highly Selective Proton-Conducting Composite Membranes … › ess-ssl › docs › pr_conferences...

1
Applications Introduction Redox flow batteries (RFBs) have been considered as a promising technology to store intermittent renewable energies such as solar and wind power due to their advantages over conventional batteries. The advantages of RFBs include modularity, transportability and flexible operation, making them well suited for transmission and distribution deferral applications. Despite the advantages, RFBs with reduced cost and improved performance (e.g., efficiency and durability) need to be developed for broad market penetration. Ion exchange membranes in RFBs that separate two soluble redox couples as electroactive species should allow rapid proton transport, but suppress the transport of reactive species between anode and cathode compartments. Nafion membrane is widely used in RFBs due to its high proton conductivity and excellent chemical stability in strong acid and oxidation conditions. However it’s expensive and has high permeability of reactive species, e.g., vanadium ions. Development of low-cost, highly selective proton-conducting membrane has the potential to produce cost effective and high performance RFBs for grid energy storage. Highly Selective Proton-Conducting Composite Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries Jenifer Cross and Yongzhu Fu* Lynntech, Inc., 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, TX 77845 *E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 979.764.2315 Technology Advantages Low cost. The composite membranes are based on industrial polymers (polysulfone or poly(ether ether ketone) and low-cost zirconium phosphates. Tunable proton conductivity and physical properties. The polymers can be sulfonated to desirable degree, proton conductivity, dimensional and mechanical stability can be tuned by controlling degree of sulfonation and compositions. High proton conductivity and Ultralow permeability of reactive species. The composite membrane consists of components that conduct protons heavily depending on Grotthuss mechanism, which requires low activation energy without water and leads to high proton conductivity and low permeability of reactive species. Improved performance of RFBs. The composite membrane can improve columbic/voltage/energy efficiencies and durability of RFBs. Experimental Results VO 2+ Ion Concentration vs. Time VO 2+ Ion Permeability Test Cell Conclusions Lynntech has developed a new series of low-cost composite membranes with high proton conductivity and ultralow permeability of vanadium ions that have the potential to be used in all vanadium RFBs. The proton conductivity and physical properties (dimensional and mechanical properties) of these membranes are tunable by adjusting the degree of sulfonation, composition, and filler distribution. Preliminary results have shown SPSf membranes exhibits comparable proton conductivity to that of Nafion 117 and much lower permeability of VO 2+ ion. Composite membranes show proton conductivity in the range of 0.05-0.1 S/cm at room temperature and much low activation energy for proton transport. Future work will be focusing on the optimization of the membrane compositions and application of these membranes in all vanadium RFBs. Lynntech’s composite membrane has the potential for the mass production of cost-effective RFBs for large scale electrical energy storage. RFBs are promising for grid energy storage and the market of all vanadium RFBs is forecast to grow to a value of more than $1.5bn/year by 2025. XRD Patterns of ZrP and Modified ZrP TEM Image of ZrP-Based Composite Membrane Objective/Approach The objective of this Phase I SBIR project is to develop a low-cost, robust, and highly selective proton-conducting composite membrane for RFBs for stationary electrical energy storage. The goal of the Phase I project is to develop a membrane with low cost (target cost < $100/m 2 ), high proton conductivity (≥ 0.08 S/cm), and low permeability of reactive species. Utilize zirconium phosphates (ZrPs) as inorganic proton conductors, modify ZrPs (mZrPs) with N-heterocycles which can promote proton transport and reduce crossover of reactive species through the membrane Incorporate mZrPs into the hydrophilic domains formed by acidic groups (i.e., sulfonic acid) of an acidic polymer membrane (e.g., sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) or poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)), prepare mZrP-SPSf or mZrP-SPEEK composite membranes Optimize the composition of composite membranes to maximize proton conductivity and minimize water uptake, dimensional change, and permeability of reactive species; correlate the relationship of composition-property-performance Grotthuss mechanism Proton transfer via imidazole Composite membrane Single Cell DICP’s 10 kW System DICP’s 100 kW System Back-up Power Smart Grid System Renewable Energy Storage 73 890 1463 2151 2706 3330 172 1621 2796 3993 5304 7332 9 12 21 26 -11 43 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (h) VO 2+ Ion Concentration (ppm) N117 SPSf-36 SPSf-32 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Temperature ( o C) Proton Conductivity (S/cm) Nafion 117 SPSf-32 SPSf-36 Proton Conductivity of Nafion 117 and SPSf Proton Conductivity of SPSf-32 and Its Composites Membranes 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Temperature ( o C) Proton Conductivity (S/cm) SPSf ZrP-SPSf-5w t ZrP-SPSf-10w t mZrP-SPSf-5w t mZrP-SPSf-10w t Imidazole can be intercalated into ZrPs, the exfoliated ZrPs could have a good distribution in composite membranes, imidazole can promote proton conduction within ZrPs by Grotthuss mechanism Maximum molar ratio of ZrP:Im is ~2:1 SPSf-36 exhibits a proton conductivity of >0.1 S/cm at RT, and comparable conductivities to those of Nafion 117 over temperature range of 30-80 °C Proton conductivity and dimensional stability have to be balanced to obtain good performance in RFBs Composite membranes show lower proton conductivities than plain SPSf membrane, but much lower activation energy for proton transport E a (plain SPSf) = ~17 kJ/mol E a (composite) = ~3-4 kJ/mol ZrP can be evenly distributed in polymers ZrP can occupy the hydrophilic domains in sulfonated polymers, resulting in narrow water/proton pathways which can lower permeability of reactive species Left: 2 M VOSO 4 + 2 M H 2 SO 4 Right: 2 M H 2 SO 4 UV/vis absorbance at 765.5 nm (VO 2+ ) Record data hourly for 5 hours Permeability decrease in the order of SPSf-36 > Nafion 117 > SPSf-32 Composite membranes are expected to have lower permeability than those membranes

Transcript of Highly Selective Proton-Conducting Composite Membranes … › ess-ssl › docs › pr_conferences...

Page 1: Highly Selective Proton-Conducting Composite Membranes … › ess-ssl › docs › pr_conferences › ...forecast to grow to a value of more than $1.5bn/year by 2025. XRD Patterns

Applications

Introduction• Redox flow batteries (RFBs) have been considered as a promising technology to store

intermittent renewable energies such as solar and wind power due to their advantages

over conventional batteries. The advantages of RFBs include modularity, transportability

and flexible operation, making them well suited for transmission and distribution deferral

applications. Despite the advantages, RFBs with reduced cost and improved performance

(e.g., efficiency and durability) need to be developed for broad market penetration.

• Ion exchange membranes in RFBs that separate two soluble redox couples as

electroactive species should allow rapid proton transport, but suppress the transport of

reactive species between anode and cathode compartments. Nafion membrane is widely

used in RFBs due to its high proton conductivity and excellent chemical stability in strong

acid and oxidation conditions. However it’s expensive and has high permeability of

reactive species, e.g., vanadium ions.

• Development of low-cost, highly selective proton-conducting membrane has the potential

to produce cost effective and high performance RFBs for grid energy storage.

Highly Selective Proton-Conducting Composite Membranes for Redox Flow Batteries

Jenifer Cross and Yongzhu Fu*Lynntech, Inc., 2501 Earl Rudder Freeway South, College Station, TX 77845

*E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 979.764.2315

Technology Advantages• Low cost. The composite membranes are based on

industrial polymers (polysulfone or poly(ether ether ketone)

and low-cost zirconium phosphates.

• Tunable proton conductivity and physical properties.

The polymers can be sulfonated to desirable degree, proton

conductivity, dimensional and mechanical stability can be

tuned by controlling degree of sulfonation and compositions.

• High proton conductivity and Ultralow permeability of

reactive species. The composite membrane consists of

components that conduct protons heavily depending on

Grotthuss mechanism, which requires low activation energy

without water and leads to high proton conductivity and low

permeability of reactive species.

• Improved performance of RFBs. The composite

membrane can improve columbic/voltage/energy efficiencies

and durability of RFBs.

Experimental Results

VO2+ Ion Concentration

vs. TimeVO2+ Ion Permeability

Test Cell

Conclusions

Lynntech has developed a new series of low-cost composite membranes

with high proton conductivity and ultralow permeability of vanadium ions that

have the potential to be used in all vanadium RFBs. The proton conductivity

and physical properties (dimensional and mechanical properties) of these

membranes are tunable by adjusting the degree of sulfonation, composition,

and filler distribution. Preliminary results have shown SPSf membranes

exhibits comparable proton conductivity to that of Nafion 117 and much

lower permeability of VO2+ ion. Composite membranes show proton

conductivity in the range of 0.05-0.1 S/cm at room temperature and much

low activation energy for proton transport. Future work will be focusing on

the optimization of the membrane compositions and application of these

membranes in all vanadium RFBs.

Lynntech’s composite membrane has the potential for the mass production

of cost-effective RFBs for large scale electrical energy storage. RFBs are

promising for grid energy storage and the market of all vanadium RFBs is

forecast to grow to a value of more than $1.5bn/year by 2025.

XRD Patterns of ZrP and

Modified ZrP

TEM Image of ZrP-Based

Composite Membrane

Objective/Approach• The objective of this Phase I SBIR project is to develop a low-cost, robust, and highly

selective proton-conducting composite membrane for RFBs for stationary electrical

energy storage. The goal of the Phase I project is to develop a membrane with low cost

(target cost < $100/m2), high proton conductivity (≥ 0.08 S/cm), and low permeability of

reactive species.

• Utilize zirconium phosphates (ZrPs) as inorganic proton conductors, modify ZrPs (mZrPs)

with N-heterocycles which can promote proton transport and reduce crossover of reactive

species through the membrane

• Incorporate mZrPs into the hydrophilic domains formed by acidic groups (i.e., sulfonic

acid) of an acidic polymer membrane (e.g., sulfonated polysulfone (SPSf) or poly(ether

ether ketone) (SPEEK)), prepare mZrP-SPSf or mZrP-SPEEK composite membranes

• Optimize the composition of composite membranes to maximize proton conductivity and

minimize water uptake, dimensional change, and permeability of reactive species;

correlate the relationship of composition-property-performance

Grotthuss mechanism Proton transfer via imidazole Composite membrane

Single Cell DICP’s 10 kW System DICP’s 100 kW System

Back-up Power Smart Grid SystemRenewable Energy Storage

73

8901463

21512706

3330

172

1621

2796

3993

5304

7332

9 12 21 26 -11 430

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0 1 2 3 4 5

Time (h)

VO

2+ Io

n C

on

cen

trati

on

(p

pm

)

N117

SPSf-36

SPSf-32

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Temperature (oC)

Pro

ton

Co

nd

uc

tiv

ity

(S

/cm

)

Nafion 117

SPSf-32

SPSf-36

Proton Conductivity of

Nafion 117 and SPSf

Proton Conductivity of SPSf-32

and Its Composites Membranes

0.04

0.08

0.12

0.16

0.20

0.24

0.28

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Temperature (oC)

Pro

ton

Co

nd

ucti

vit

y (

S/c

m)

SPSf

ZrP-SPSf-5w t

ZrP-SPSf-10w t

mZrP-SPSf-5w t

mZrP-SPSf-10w t

• Imidazole can be intercalated into

ZrPs, the exfoliated ZrPs could have a

good distribution in composite

membranes, imidazole can promote

proton conduction within ZrPs by

Grotthuss mechanism

• Maximum molar ratio of ZrP:Im is ~2:1

• SPSf-36 exhibits a proton conductivity

of >0.1 S/cm at RT, and comparable

conductivities to those of Nafion 117

over temperature range of 30-80 °C

• Proton conductivity and dimensional

stability have to be balanced to obtain

good performance in RFBs

• Composite membranes show lower

proton conductivities than plain SPSf

membrane, but much lower activation

energy for proton transport

• Ea (plain SPSf) = ~17 kJ/mol

Ea (composite) = ~3-4 kJ/mol

• ZrP can be evenly distributed in polymers

• ZrP can occupy the hydrophilic domains

in sulfonated polymers, resulting in

narrow water/proton pathways which can

lower permeability of reactive species

• Left: 2 M VOSO4 + 2 M H2SO4

Right: 2 M H2SO4

• UV/vis absorbance at 765.5 nm (VO2+)

• Record data hourly for 5 hours

• Permeability decrease in the order of

SPSf-36 > Nafion 117 > SPSf-32

• Composite membranes are expected to

have lower permeability than those

membranes