Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

40
Highlights: The E-expectations of College-Bound High School Juniors and Seniors Stephanie Geyer Associate Vice President for Web Strategy and Interactive Marketing Services

description

Sl

Transcript of Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Page 1: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Highlights: The E-expectations of College-Bound High School Juniors and Seniors

Stephanie GeyerAssociate Vice President for Web Strategy and

Interactive Marketing Services

Page 2: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Finding answers since 2005

Visit any partner site to find the latest studies, including the 2012 E-expectations of Juniors and Seniors white paper and trend reports for our recent Mobile and Communication Preferences studies.

E-Expectations Research

http://bit.ly/NkfloGFind all of the past studies here!

Page 3: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Telephone survey of 2,000 high school students

• Facilitated in March and April 2012

• List source: National Research Center for College and University Admissions (NRCCUA)

• 95% confidence interval

• +/- 3% margin of error

Methodology

Page 4: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

An opportunity to compare their preferences with our practices

Look for this logo to signal data points from the E-Recruitment Practices study of 256 U.S. colleges and universities facilitated by Noel-Levitz via Web survey in April 2012

Page 5: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

What challenges did they experience on the last college site they visited?

55% couldn’t find what they wanted because of challenges with the site navigation• Juniors were much more likely to have

challenges finding academic and cost content than seniors

Page 6: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Content PrioritiesFirst target Most important Mobile

Academics 55% 47% 23%

Money 23% 29% 17%

Process 11% 11% 11%

Visit 5% 3% 3%

Campus 3% 5% 3%

Athletics 3% 3% 3%

Page 7: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Most effective way to learn about a school’s ACADEMIC PROGRAM OPTIONS

29%

30%

38%

43%

50%

53%

56%

58%

74%

68%

24%

31%

38%

43%

48%

50%

55%

61%

68%

71%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Live chats/webcasts

Blog posts

Social media

Videos of faculty/current students

Independent online sites

Web search

E-mail from program faculty

Presentations from faculty/studentsduring campus visit

Printed brochures

Descriptions on a Web site

SeniorsJuniors

Page 8: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

• 41% Browse through an alphabetically-ordered list

• 33% Use a search box• 26% Look through a college or

departmental page for all of the programs within that area

Alpha-ordered list is the top method for sharing academic program options

Page 9: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Most effective Way to Learn About COST, AID, AND SCHOLARSHIPS

9%

11%

12%

18%

16%

20%

19%

21%

28%

34%

49%

8%

9%

10%

15%

15%

16%

16%

21%

28%

29%

49%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Blog posts

Social media pages

Live Chats/Webcasts

Search

Calculators

Independent online sites

Videos explaining how to apply foraid/scholarships

Presentations from financial aidstaff

E-mail from financial aid staff

Printed brochures

Details on a Web site

Seniors

Juniors

Page 10: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

23% of all students have used one, down from 36% in 2011

• 31% of seniors had done so, compared to 15% of juniors

Why haven’t they used a calculator yet?• 74% haven’t found one, up from 50% in

2011o No significant difference between juniors

or seniors

Calculator Use Decreased

Got net price calculator?

90% of 4-yr privates77% of 4-yr publics59% of 2-yr schools

Page 11: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Most effective way to learn about a school’s CAMPUS LOCATION AND COMMUNITY

29%

30%

36%

42%

44%

44%

52%

62%

69%

69%

25%

30%

34%

41%

47%

46%

50%

58%

72%

68%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Live chats/webcasts

Blog posts

Social media

Independent sites

Videos

Search

E-mail messages

Printed brochures

Campus visits

Web site details

SeniorsJuniors

Page 12: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Can they find your inquiry form easily?When they find the content they need on your site, they’re going to look

for a way to connect and engage!

1. Inquiry form2. Visit options3. Faculty e-mail links4. Admissions e-mail links5. Catalog detail

Inquiry form online?

88% of 4-yr privates77% of 4-yr publics62% of 2-yr schools

Page 13: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

More than two-thirds (67%) have regular access to a

mobile device• 20% are using tablets• 52% of college-bound

students have looked at a college Web site using a

mobile device

Site optimized for mobile?

35% of 4-yr privates39% of 4-yr publics7% of 2-yr schools

Page 14: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Exposure to QR codes at odds with use

17% of juniors and 13% of seniors have used a QR code related to a college or university

84% said it was a worthwhile experience

Using QR codes?

67% of 4-yr privates61% of 4-yr publics44% of 2-yr schools

Are we over-doing it?

Page 15: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

• 32% to see how big/small the campus is

• 26% to learn more about the area around campus

• 24% to get a sense of the buildings and architectural style

• 11% to see the insides of the residence halls

• 4% to see what the people look like

43% of all students have viewed a virtual tour or interactive campus map

Page 16: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Did it change the way you feel about the school?

Virtual tour:40% of 4-yr privates52% of 4-yr publics38% of 2-yr schoolsInteractive map:35% of 4-yr privates44% of 4-yr publics10% of 2-yr schools

51%33%

12%

3%No change

For thebetterSome better,some worseFor theworse

Page 17: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Are students interested in using Webcams to interact with college personnel?

45%

75%

4%

55%

25%

96%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Use Webcam Would talk tocollege repon Webcam

Have talked tocollege repon Webcam

Yes No

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc.2012 E-Expectations Report: The Online Expectations of College-Bound Juniors and Seniors

Page 18: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Webcam use higher among some students of color

75% of students would talk to an admission rep or current student via webcam

• 81% of juniors • 69% of seniors

Underrepresented students are more likely to use webcams for personal use

• 45% overall• Asian (62%) • African-American (52%) • Hispanic (46%) • Caucasian (39%)

Page 19: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Students say they would participate in live chat sessions…

69% of all students would participate in a live chat event with faculty about a specific program

72% would do so to learn more about cost, aid, and scholarships

Student: I’ve heard your engineering program is one of the best. Can you explain why?

Faculty Member: There are a few important factors to consider…

Page 20: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

If only we would ASK them to participate in live chat

While 75% of students would chat with college reps via webcam...

only 4% have actually had these online conversations

Online Channels Offered

4-year private

4-yearpublic

2-year school

Live chats 34% 39% 7%

Instant messaging 16% 21% 10%

Web camera 11% 10% 0%

Webcast events 10% 16% 7%

Skype 35% 19% 7%

FaceTime 4% 5% 3%

Page 21: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Which social media resources do students use at least once per week?

Facebook 79% Pinterest 6%

YouTube 62% Storify 1%

Twitter 27% SCVNGR 1%

Google+ 19% Foursquare 1%Tumblr 9% None 7%

StumbleUpon 7%

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc.2012 E-Expectations Report: The Online Expectations of College-Bound Juniors and Seniors

Page 22: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Facebook use remains steady at 79%

• 46% have—up from 27% in 2011

Visited a school page?

69% have “liked” a school’s pageWhat do they expect in return? Not much!

• 36% info about admissions deadlines and events• 34% info about academic programs• 30% updates through the news feed• 30% the name of the school to appear in their “likes”• 26% special info they can’t get elsewhere• 26% interaction with page admins• 26% contact from school about admission• 25% photos and videos• 21% interaction with other people who like the page• 20% posts to share• 18% specific info tailored to user profile

• 98% of 4-year privates have a Facebook page

o 70% have a separate admissions page

• 97% of 4-year publics have a Facebook page

o 74% have a separate admissions page

• 93% of 2-year schools have a Facebook page

o 21% have a separate admissions page

Page 23: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

More than1/x day

1x/day Every otherday

2x/week 1x/week 2x/month 1x/month Never Other

Student Expectations4-yr Private4-yr Public2-year

Facebook: Frequency of posts

Page 24: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Manytimes/day

1x/day Every otherday

2x/week 1x/week 2x/month Never Other

Student Use4-yr Private4-yr Public2-year

Twitter use increased to 27% up from 9%

25% follow a school feed—up from 19%How often do you look at Twitter/update? Using Twitter?

4-yr private: 37%4-yr public: 44%2-yr school: 14%

Page 25: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Manytimes/day

1x/day Every otherday

2x/week 1x/week 2x/month 1x/month Never Other

Student Use

4-yr Private

4-yr Public

19% use Google+; 10% include schools

How often do you look at/update Google+?Using Google+?

4-yr private: 7%4-yr public: 10%2-yr school: 0%

Page 26: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Manytimes/day

1x/day Every otherday

2x/week 1x/week 2x/month 1x/month Never Other

Student Use4-yr Private4-yr Public2-yr School

6% use Pinterest; 5% pin school posts

How often do you look at/update Pinterest?Using Pinterest?

4-yr private: 4%4-yr public: 11%2-yr school: 3%

Page 27: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

More than a third (35%) will “check in” while visiting your campus

• 35% will check in• 12% might• 53% would not

(This question asked of any student indicating use of Facebook, FourSquare, Gowalla, SCVNGR or other location-based resources.)

Page 28: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

• Guidance Counselors (74%)o African-American (82%) compared to Caucasian (71%)o Web plays extremely important (77%) compared to Web

plays no role (58%)• Friends (68%)

o Have access to a mobile device (72%) compared to those who don’t (60%)

• Teachers (66%)• Family (66%)

o Caucasian (69%) compared to Asian (59%) and Hispanic (58%)

o Parent attended college (70%) compared to parent didn’t attend (56%)

o Have mobile phone (69%) compared to those without (59%)• Coaches (38%)

o Male (43%) compared to female (33%)o African-American (43%) compared to Asian (31%) and

Hispanic (35%)o Inquiries (41%) compared to applied (30%)

PEOPLE helping students formulate their lists of schools

Page 29: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Web search just trailing print• Brochures/print mail from schools (72%)

• Will give an e-mail address (74%) compared to those who wouldn’t (57%)

• Google, Bing, or Yahoo search (67%)• Asian (77%), African-American (74%) and

Hispanic (72%) compared to Caucasian (63%)

• E-mails I get from schools (62%)• The College Board (51%)• MyCollegeOptions (40%)• CollegeWeekLive (30%)• Cappex (12%)• Zinch (8%)• Peterson’s (5%)

RESOURCES students use to form the list of schools they’ll consider

Using SEO strategies?

42% of 4-yr privates34% of 4-yr publics21% of 2-yr schools

Page 30: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

What resources are most influential?

4.54

4.163.84 3.85

3.73.53

3.38

2.29

4.59

4.12 4.09 4 4.043.75

3.59

2.47

00.5

11.5

22.5

33.5

44.5

5

Tour Web site Talk with astudent

Talk withadmissions

rep

Collegesearchsites

Guidancecounselor

Brochures College'sFacebook

page

SeniorsJuniors

Page 31: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

78% of juniors; 85% of seniors say they still use e-mail at least once per week

93% will give an e-mail address to schools • Just 5% will give a family or parent account

When?• When they ask for it 55%

• Juniors 63%• Seniors 48%

• Application 40%• Juniors 33%• Seniors 45%

• Post-acceptance 4%• Never 1%

E-mail use remains steady

Page 32: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Will students open e-mail messages form a college or university?

97%

68%

3%32%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

College they areinterested in attending

College they do notknow about

Yes No

© 2012 Noel-Levitz, Inc.2012 E-Expectations Report: The Online Expectations of College-Bound Juniors and Seniors

Page 33: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

60% say it’s OK to send them texts

Especially…• African-American and Hispanic• Lower income• Students from the South• Mobile users

Why not?• Don’t bother me! 58%• Texting is for family/friends 27%• No data plan 6%• I’m not ready 3%• Too expensive 3%• Phone doesn’t text 3%

It might be time to start your texting program, if you haven’t already

Page 34: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Do you collect cell numbers? How do you use them?

4-year private

4-year public

2-year school

Collect cell numbers? 92% 74% 97%Relationship-building calls 86% 61% 36%Notifications 40% 24% 57%Telecounseling call centers 38% 48% 21%Individual text messages 35% 22% 21%Mass text messages 16% 9% 18%Other 4% 15% 11%

Page 35: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Recommendations

Page 36: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Integrated Strategies Will Leverage Resources and Improve Service

Test your Web site information architecture with key markets. Do they get it?

Invest in search engine optimization strategiesWork on a content strategy—integrate site and social media assets.

Ready for even more mobile users?

Build an editorial calendar to support your social media engagements; integrate with  e‐mail flow

Experiment with a variety of Webcast/Web cam and live chat engagement options

Page 37: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

E-mail: Still NOT Dead

• Keep it in your overall communications flow mix.

• Integrate messages with your social media editorial calendars.

• Be sure that key message themes from inquiry stage are repeated in your yield flows.

• Are you testing your messages?

• Do you have content-matched landing pages to support engagement and conversion?

• Are you measuring carefully and remembering to check in on the results on a regular basis?

Page 38: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Use the communication channels students prefer• The conversations students have with

campus representatives are impactful

• Students use live chat, webcams, and text messaging frequently… and are open to speaking with camps reps through these channels

• Get a strategy in place to line up with the rest of your communications flow.

• Use texting for key upcoming deadlines and use live chat or webcasts to make personal connections

• Set up a measurement strategy and pay attention to the results

Page 39: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana

Join our mailing list to receive more about E-expectations

and other research

NoelLevitz.com

Page 40: Highlights from the 2012 E-expectations Study Presented to CASE/Indiana