Higher Resolution Operational Models
description
Transcript of Higher Resolution Operational Models
Higher Resolution Operational Models
Operational Mesoscale Model History
• Early: LFM, NGM (history)
• Eta (mainly history)
• MM5: Still used by some, but phasing out
• NMM- Main NWS mesoscale model
• WRF-ARW: Heavily used by research and some operational communities.
• The NWS calls their mesoscale run NAM: North American Mesoscale . Now NMM
Vertical Coordinate Systems
• Originally p and z
• Then eta, sigma p and sigma z, theta
• Increasingly use of hybrids– e.g., sigma-theta
Sigma
Sigma-Theta
Hybrid and Eta Coordinates
ground MSL
ground
Pressure domain
Sigma domain
= 0
= 1 = 1
Ptop Ptop = 0
Horizontal resolution of 12 km
12-km terrain
Nesting
Why Nesting?
• Could run a model over the whole globe, but that would require large amounts of computational resource, particularly if done at high resolution.
• Alternative is to only use high resolution where you need it…nesting is one approach.
• In nesting, a small higher resolution domain is embedded with a larger, lower-resolution domain.
WRF Model Family
A Tale of Two Dynamical Cores
Why WRF?• An attempt to create a national mesoscale prediction
system to be used by both operational and research communities.
• A new, state-of-the-art model that has good conservation characteristics (e.g., conservation of mass) and good numerics (so not too much numerical diffusion)
• A model that could parallelize well on many processors and easy to modify.
• Plug-compatible physics to foster improvements in model physics.
• Designed for grid spacings of 1-10 km
WRF Modeling System
Obs Data,Analyses
Post Processors,Verification
WRF Software Infrastructure
Dynamic Cores
Mass Core
NMM Core…
Standard Physics Interface
Physics Packages
StaticInitialization
3DVAR DataAssimilation
Two WRF Cores• ARW (Advanced Research WRF) • developed at NCAR• Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model (NMM) Core developed at
NCEP• Both work under the WRF IO Infrastructure
NMM ARW
The NCAR ARW Core Model:(See: www.wrf-model.org)
Terrain following vertical coordinate two-way nesting, any ratio Conserves mass, entropy and scalars using up to
6th order spatial differencing equ for fluxes. Very good numerics, less implicit smoothing in numerics.
NCAR physics package (converted from MM5 and Eta), NOAH unified land-surface model, NCEP physics adapted too
The NCEP Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model: NMM (Janjic et al. 2001), NWS
WRF
Hybrid sigmapressure vertical coord. 3:1 nesting ratio Conserves kinetic energy, enstrophy and
momentum using 2nd order differencing equation Modified Eta physics, Noah unified land-surface
model, NCAR physics adapted too
•The National Weather Service dropped Eta in 2006 as the NAM (North American Mesoscale) run and replaced it with WRF NMM.
•The Air Force uses WRF ARW.
•Most universities use WRF ARW
NWS NMM—The NAM RUN• Run every six hours over N. American and adjacent
ocean
• Run to 84 hours at 12-km grid spacing.
• Uses the Grid-Point Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system (3DVAR)
• Start with GDAS (GFS analysis) as initial first guess at t-12 hour (the start of the analysis cycle)
• Runs an intermittent data assimilation cycle every three hours until the initialization time.
NAM 12-km Domain (dashed)
In March Added 4-km Domains
Guam
18Z
06Z
00Z12Z
00Z12Z
06Z18Z
00Z12Z
4.0 km WRF-NMM
5.15 km WRF-ARW
48 hr fcsts from both
Unless there are hurricanes
Expanded PR/Hispaniola domain
March 2011 Upgrade of HiResWindow
Details of NCEP HiResWindow Runs No Changes with This Upgrade
WRF-NMM WRF-ARWHorizontal grid spacing (km)
4.0 5.15
Vertical levels 35 sigma-pressure hybrid
35 sigma
PBL/turbulence MYJ YSU
Microphysics Ferrier WSM3
Land-Surface NOAH NOAH
Radiation (SW/LW)
GFDL/GFDL Dudhia/RRTM
Parameterized Convection
None None
NMM
• Was generally inferior to GFS