Proficiency English: Language and Composition Bk. 1 (Proficiency English)
High Stakes in Language Proficiency
-
Upload
german-palomares -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of High Stakes in Language Proficiency
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 1/36
High Stakes in Laguage Pociecy
Flight Safety D I G E S T
JANUARY– FEBRUARY 2006
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 2/36
High Stakes in Language Profciency
I a eot to euce acciets ivolvig commuicatio
eciecies, ICAO is equiig pilots, cotolles a
aeoautical statio opeatos ivolve i iteatioal
opeatios to be teste o thei ability to speak a
uesta Eglish. At stake ae caees, iusty
ivestmet i taiig a testig — a saety.
Global Passenger-mortality Risk
Decreased Substantially in AccidentsFrom 2000 to 2005
The isk o yig i a acciet aboa a aomly chose
fight was lowe tha eve i the peio 2000–2005, i evey
iusty segmet examie. Whe passege atalities uig
the teoist attacks o Sept. 11, 2001, wee iclue, howeve,
passege-motality isk i ot ecease o U.S. scheule
omestic passege jet fights compae with the peio 1990–1999.
Increased Automation Will Bring NewHuman Factors Challenges to ATM
Ai tac maagemet (ATM) huma actos specialists ae
wokig to aticipate, a thus avoi, poblems associate
with geate automatio.
Cleaning Solvent Blamed or B-777Landing Gear Fire
Ivestigatos ou that the subsequet evacuatio exceee
ceticatio time limits a that passeges wee ot le to a
secue aea.
Flight Safety FoundationFo Eveyoe Cocee With the Saety o Flight
www.fightsaety.org
OFFICErS And STAFF
Chairman, Board o Governors Amb. Ewa W. Stimpso
President and CEO Stuat Matthews
Executive Vice President robet H. Vael
General Counsel and Secretary Keeth P. Qui, Esq.
Treasurer davi J. Bage
AdMInISTrATIVE
Manager, Support Services Lia Cowley Hoge
FInAnCIAL
Chie Financial Ofcer Pey L. Youg
Accountant Millicet Wheele
MEMBErSHIP
Director, Membership
and Development A Hill
Membership Services
Coordinator Ahlam Waha
Membership Services
Coordinator namatha Appaao
PUBLICATIOnS
Senior Editor Mak Lacagia
Senior Editor Waye rosekas
Senior Editor Lia Weelma
Associate Editor rick daby
Web and Print
Production Coordinator Kae K. Ehlich
Production Designer A L. Mulliki
Production Specialist Susa d. ree Librarian, Jerry Lederer
Aviation Saety Library Paticia Setze
TECHnICAL
Director o Technical Programs James M. Bui
Managing Director o
Air Transport Saety Services Louis A. Soetio III
Q-Star Program Administrator robet Feele
Manager, Data Systems
and Analysis robet do, Ph.d.
Manager o Aviation
Saety Audits daol V. Holsma
Founder Jeome Leee1902–2004
Flight Safety Digest Vol. 25 no. 1–2 Jauay–Febuay 2006
I This Issue
Flight Saety Foundation is an international membership organizationdedicated to the continuous improvement o aviation saety. Nonprotand independent, the Foundation was launched ocially in 1947 inresponse to the aviation industry’s need or a neutral clearinghouse todisseminate objective saety inormation, and or a credible and knowl-edgeable body that would identiy threats to saety, analyze the problemsand recommend practical solutions to them. Since its beginning, theFoundation has acted in the public interest to produce positive infuenceon aviation saety. Today, the Foundation provides leadership to morethan 900 member organizations in more than 150 countries.
20
L I B R A R Y
STATS
14
B R I E F S
25
Cove photo: © Copyight 2006 Photodisc Ic.
1
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 3/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
Message From the President
Looking Ahead: A New Format or FSF Publications
i m ps c F S F (FSF) pcs w ms p F’s s. T m w c cvc, sss pp. i’s sm w xc , s w v w .
b, s w c k w .
T sv c FSF pcs (w m, v m) w pc s m pcc Aviation Saety World . W w c cv sm pcs w ws v, s w s w s, s pck.
Aviation Saety World w pv cmp p, -c s. T w k w cpps cs; cmp, m v pp; ss, mz-p pp.
W v cmm svs s c cs mpc m s w svs w m. y b gvs cs F S F cz s cmpss sm c cms. T s w q mj , wc w pc pcs “ ” w s ss s w cc
w pc. T c Aviation Saety World s sc J ss.
a i ms sk c ps, i m c w Aviation Saety World w w.
S MwsPs CeoF S F
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 4/36
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 5/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
Cc ccs vv-
q pcc
s cmps es
p-c cmmc
s pmp i Cv av
oz (iCao) ss s
pcc qms s.C qms s
cmp Mc 2008.
W w ss s cm s
es s p-
c cmmc.
“es s p c
cmm v,”
iCao s.1 “T w pvss mz
.”
es s v w s
60 cs s
sc m m cs, iCao
s. Pp w spk es s sc - s “ ” m s
w spk es s s .
nvss, s es -
p ( smss spc
) s w cvs.
“bcs s s cs ss
c , pp
High Stakes in Language Profciency
In an eort to reduce accidents involving communication deiciencies, ICAO is requiring pilots,
controllers and aeronautical station operators involved in international operations to be tested
or their ability to speak and understand English. At stake are careers, industry investment in
training and testing — and saety.
— FSF Editorial StaFF
© 2 0 0 6 B l n k S t o c k
n d i m g e s . c o m ,
i n c .
a l l r g h t s r e s e r v e d .
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 6/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
ssv sss
s pc,” s ez
Mws, spcs p-
p scs
p —
Pcc rqms
Cmm es S gp(PriCeSg) — vp
es pcc
ss iCao.2 “i
cs v,
s, cmm
s vs ckw-
. T cc es
v cmmcs s m
c s s.”
T m sm cs w
pcc qms. iCao c s s- v s mm ss “js”
sm ss x
s.
“T 2008 ws v q-
ms,” s P lm, c iCao’s F
S Sc.3 “o spcss v
s pv m ps
sm ps w, s m sm
wk. W ’ xpc mj c.”
T PriCeSg w cv ap 2006
s sv ss m w
mk cmms iCao.
Saety Implications
F S F (FSF) s m
zs v c v-
pm mmm pmc ss
es pcc. T F’s
cmms w s m
sc 1990s c -
(CFit) ppc-- ccs.
“T cm cccs cs
cws s s ps,”
FSF appc-- acc rc
(alar) tsk Fc s 1998.4 “i sv cc-
cs vv -v es spks,
sss xc p cmmc-
w cws atC [ c
c]. Sv cccs vv ms
cmmc - mc
cw, w atC qs cc/
vc ms smss.
“T s mpcs m s m p-
c msss w cm.
Sm s pms es- atC ppcs, wc vv
xcs f m cm-
mcs vs ws v
m es. T iCao czs
s, es s ms w s atC
cmmcs s c s. o
pms m s m ck q c
c es- sks s
s c m. bcs ssv
pc [spcs] c spcs s s-
, v cmm s
p ss cmm-s es- sk vs. uz
s m, ss
c, s c.”
High Priority
i 1998, i m c iCao
assm k c s ps
cs “ pc cc
cmp p cmmcs
es .”
i s pps s, i spcc c
1995 CFit cc C, Cm,
1996 m cs d s v -
c “ck pcc cmps
es cws c
cs” (s “ls ts,” p 3).
T iCao assm p, ss
p , s pps i. i
2000, PriCeSg ws ss
ccs iCao ss cmm
pccs (SarPs) c vc cmmcs ps, vp m-
mm es- pcc qms
vp sz s qms
pcs.5
bs s p’s cmms, iCao
2003 p sv mms ax
1 (ps cs), ax 6 (
Continued on page 5
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 7/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
a
gun csn, fue-exhusn
ccen, cne fgh n
en (CFit) ccen n
m csn wee ce by he
inenn Cv avn ognzn
(iCao) s exmpes f f ce
ccens nvvng neque Engsh-
nguge pfcency.1
“Wh hese seemngy ffeen ypes f
ccens h n cmmn ws h, n
ech ne, ccen nvesgs fun h
nsuffcen Engsh-nguge pfcency n
he p f he fgh cew cne
h pye cnbung e n he chn
f evens eng he ccen,” iCao
s. “in n hese hgh-pfe
ccens, mupe ncens n ne
msses s esu f nguge pbems
e epe nnuy, nsgng evew f
cmmuncn pceues n sns
wwe.”
‘We Are Now at Takeoff’
the gun csn ce by iCao nvve
w Beng 747s ls res ap n
tenefe, Cny isns, Spn, n Mch
27, 1977.2
Vsby ws euce subsny by fgwhen cne ssue epue nsuc-
ns he fgh cew f KlM 747 h
ws ne up f keff n he unwy. the
fs ffce, whse nve nguge ws
duch, e bck he cne’s nsuc-
ns n s, “We e nw keff.”
the cne, whse nve nguge ws
Spnsh, n unesn h he fs
ffce’s nsmssn ws men cnvey
h he KlM cew wee cnucng ke-
ff. inse, he cne beeve h he
KlM cew wee mnnng he pne’s
psn n he unwy n wng keff
cence.
the cn e cknwege he fs
ffce’s nsmssn by syng, “oK. Sn
by f keff. i w c yu.”
a he sme me, he fgh cew f Pn
amecn 747 e, “We e s x-
ng wn he unwy.” the smuneus
nsmssns by he cne n he
Pn am cew esue n whsng sun
n he fequency h se hee
secns.
the cne he Pn am cew
ep ce f he unwy, n he Pn am
cew cknwege he nsucn. Sn
heefe, he fgh engnee b he
KlM pne ske hs cegues f he
Pn am pne ws ce f he unwy.
the KlM cpn epe, “oh, yes.”
the KlM pne ws beng e f
keff when suck he Pn am pne.
a f 583 pepe wee ke n he
csn.
in s fn ep, he Spnsh gvenmen
s h he funmen cuse f he c-
cen ws h he KlM cpn “k ff
whu cence; n bey he ‘sn
by f keff’ [nsucn] fm he we;
n neup keff when Pn am
epe h hey wee s n he unwy;
[n,] n epy he fgh engnee’s quey
s whehe he Pn am [pne] h
ey ef he unwy, epe emphcy
n he ffmve.”
‘I Think We Need Priority’
the fgh cew’s fue cey cnvey
cc w-fue sun ffc
cn (atC) pye e n he Jn. 25,
1990, fue-exhusn ccen nvvng n
avnc anes Beng 707 Cve Neck,
New Yk, U.S.3
Becuse f vese wehe cnns n
he nhesen Une Ses, he cew
h been nsuce h hee mes, f
f bu ne hu n 17 mnues,
ung he scheue fgh fm Bgá,
Cmb, Jhn F. Kenney inenn
ap (JFK), New Yk.
the pne ws n he h hng p-
en bu 39 nuc mes (72 kmees)
suh f JFK when he cne exene
he me whch he cew cu expec
fuhe cence. the fs ffce s, “ah,
we, i hnk we nee py.”
the cene cne s, “rge. Hw
ng cn yu h n wh s yu e-
ne [p]?”
in sepe nsmssns, he fs
ffce s, “We’ be be h bu
fve mnues,” n h he ene p
“ws Bsn, bu we cn’ nw … we
un u f fue nw.”
the cne ssue vec sequence
he 707 wh ffc n n exene ef
wnwn eg f runwy 22l. as he
pne nee he p, hweve, he
cne he cew cnuc 360-
egee un f spcng.
the pne encunee wn she s
he cew cnuce he nsumen nng
sysem (ilS) ppch runwy 22l. the
unwy envnmen ws n n sgh when
he pne eche ecsn hegh, n
he cpn ce f msse ppch.
afe epng he msse ppch, he
fs ffce he ppch cne,
“We’e unnng u f fue, s.”
the cne s, “i’m gng bng yu
bu ffeen mes [28 kmees] nhes
n un yu bck n f he ppch. ish fne wh yu n yu fue?”
“i guess s. thnk yu vey much,” he
fs ffce s. a few mnues e, he
equese, n eceve, vec he
fn ppch cuse.
ahugh he cpn h he fs
ffce seve mes ece n eme-
gency, he fs ffce h n ece
n emegency. the fs ffce beeve
h hs eques f py hnng h
been unes by atC s eques f
emegency hnng.
a fu engnes f me u, n he -
pne suck en bu 16 nuc mes
(30 kmees) fm he p. of he 158
ccupns, 73 wee ke n 81 wee
seusy njue.
in s fn ep, he U.S. Nn
tnspn Sfey B s h he
Lost in Translation
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 8/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
pbbe cuses f he ccen wee
“he fue f he fgh cew equey
mnge he pne’s fue n he
fue cmmunce n emegency fue
sun [atC] befe fue exhusn
ccue.”
‘Go Tulua?’
in he CFit ccen, Spnsh-spekng
cne’s nby pbe f nfmn
fm n Engsh-spekng fgh cew bu
seemngy gc cence equess n
psn eps esue n he cne
n ezng h he fgh cew wee cn-
fuse bu he psn n fyng he
pne ne munnus en nh f
C, Cmb, n dec. 20, 1995.4
the cew f he amecn anes Beng757 wee nsnng fm cuse fgh
nnpecsn nsumen ppch
runwy 19 he C p. En ue fm
Mm, F, U.S., he pne ws beng
fwn n nn atC envnmen n
n nghme vsu meegc cn-
ns (VMC).
the cne ssue he fwng ce-
nce: “Cee Vor dME [vey-hgh-
fequency mnecn /snce
mesung equpmen] ppch unwy
ne nne, rz numbe ne v. rep
tuu Vor.”
the tuu Vor ws bu 34 nuc mes
(63 kmees) nh f he p. the
rz nnecn becn (NdB) ws
2.6 nuc mes (4.8 kmees) nh
f he p. the cew scusse whch
nvgn hey shu fy nex. the
cpn (he p n fyng) hen ske he
cne f cence nvge ecy
he rz NdB “n hen he rz
v.”
the cne epe, “affmve. tke he
rz ne n unwy ne nne. the wn
s cm.” the cne hen he cew
ep tuu n he 21-nuc-me
(39-kmee) dME fx suh f tuu.
as he cpn cknwege he nsuc-
ns, he pne psse ve he tuu
Vor n hen une ef n esey
heng. the cew n eze h he
pne h psse ve he Vor becuse
he wypns enee n he fgh mnge-
men sysem (FMS) h been ese when
hey h empe ene he enfe
f he rz NdB. in n, nse f
eneng he enfe f he rz NdB,
he cew h enee he enfe f he
rme NdB, whch ws bu 132 nu-c mes (244 kmees) es.
the pne emne n he esey
heng, w he rme NdB, bu
ne mnue. the cpn hen he fs
ffce un gh n pcee he C
Vor, whch ws bu 10 nuc mes
(19 kmees) suh f he p.
the cpn he cne h he -
pne ws 38 nuc mes (70 kmees)
fm he C Vor n ske, “Yu wn
us g tuu n hen he rz …
unwy ne nne?”
the cne nvesgs h he
cew’s quey bu fyng ecy he
tuu Vor me n sense becuse he
epe psn 38 nuc mes fm he
C Vor nce h he pne ws
suh f he tuu Vor.
“He s h hs fuency n nn-vn
Engsh ws me n he cu n sk
hem ebe n he eques,” s
he fn ep by he aenáuc Cv f
he repubc f Cmb. “the cnefuhe se h, h he ps been
Spnsh-spekng, he wu hve
hem h he eques me e sense
n h ws gc n ncnguen.
He s h becuse f mns n hs
cmmn f Engsh, he ws unbe
cnvey hese hughs he cew.”
inse, he cne ese he ce-
nce n equese he 757’s psn
eve he C Vor s fws: “Yu
cn [unnegbe w] ne unwy ne
nne. Yu cn use unwy ne nne. Wh
s yu ue n he dME fm C?”
the cpn s h he pne ws 37
nuc mes (69 kmees) fm he C
Vor n 10,000 fee.
the cew wee scussng he pgm-
mng f he FMS when he cne
gn ske f he pne’s ue.
the cpn epe h he pne ws
9,000 fee. the cne ske f
psn ep, bu he cpn n
espn.
Fve secns fe he cne’s eques
f psn ep, he cew eceve
gun-pxmy wnng sysem (GPWS)en wnng. they ppe fu pwe
n se he pne’s nse, bu n
ec he spes. the pne suck
munn ge bu 8,900 fee. of he
163 ccupns, 159 wee ke n fu
wee seusy njue.
aenáuc Cv s h he pbbe
cuses f he ccen wee:
• “the fgh cew’s fue equey
pn n execue he ppch
runwy 19 [ he C p] n
he neque use f umn;
• “Fue f he fgh cew scn-
nue he ppch n C, e-
spe numeus cues eng hem
f he nvsby f cnnung he
ppch;
• “the ck f sun weness
f he fgh cew egng vec
nvgn, pxmy en n he
eve cn f cc s;
[n,]
• “Fue f he fgh cew eve
bsc nvgn he me
when he FMS-ssse nvgn
becme cnfusng n emne n
excessve wk n cc phse
f fgh.”
‘Flight Level 140’
a fgh cew’s msunesnng f n -
ue cence pye e n he m
csn f Su abn anes Beng
747 n Kzkh awys iyushn il-76t
h ccue ne deh, in, n Nv. 12,
1996. Nghme VMC peve, bu bh
pnes wee beng fwn n cus when
he csn ccue. a ep by acms
s h nehe pne ws equppe wh
csn-vnce sysem.5
the 747 fgh cew wee cnucng
sn nsumen epue pceue
fe keff fm deh. the cew atC
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 9/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
h hey wee ne he ssgne ue,
Fgh leve (Fl) 140 (ppxmey 14,000
fee), n equese cence cnnue
he cmb. the cne he cew
mnn Fl 140.
the il-76t cew wee cnucng e-scen n ecpc heng n
deh. the cne he cew mn-
n Fl 150 n vse h n ubun
pne ws Fl 140. the pe
b he il-76t ske he cne f
he he pne’s psn. the cne
s, “tffc s egh mes nw, fgh eve
ne fu ze.”
the cpn, fs ffce, fgh engnee
n nvg b he il-76t ep-
ey msunes he cne’s n-
sucns men h hey h been
cee escen Fl 140. the
pe bseve h he pne ws
escenng bew Fl 150 n shue
hs cegues, “Keep ne fve ze.
dn’ escen.” the ps wee nng
cmb when he csn ccue. the
37 ccupns f he il-76t n he 312
ccupns f he 747 wee ke.
“the fue f ms f he il-76 cew
cecy unesn he sun ws -
bue he ck f wkng knwege
f Engsh,” he acms ep s. ■
— FSF E Sff
Notes
1. inenn Cv avn ognzn
(iCao). dcumen 9835. Manual on
the Implementation of ICAO Language
Proficiency Requirements. 2004.
2. Gvenmen f Spn. Aircraft
Collision: Boeing 747, PH-BUF, of
KLM and Boeing 747, N737PA, of Pan
Am at Los Rodeos (Tenerife) on March
27, 1977 . Engsh vesn, Juy 12,
1978.
3. U.S. Nn tnspn Sfey
B. Aircraft Accident Report:
Avianca, The Airline of Colombia;
Boeing 707-321B, HK 2016; Fuel
Exhaustion; Cove Neck, New York;
January 25, 1990. NtSB/aar-91/04.
4. aenáuc Cv f he repubc
f Cmb. Controlled Flight Into
Terrain; American Airlines Flight 965;
Boeing 757-223, N651AA; Near Cali,
Colombia; December 20, 1995.
5. acms. World Aircraft Accident
Summary . issue 139: a96:37.
ps), ax 10 (c -
cmmcs) ax 11 ( c
svcs).
i 2004, iCao ps dcm 9835,
Manual on the Implementation o ICAO
Language Proiciency Requirements,
pv c “ ms
cv v mss,
s zs.”
SarPs s
cmmcs sw
appx a (p 11). iCao’s lm
mpc s
m ss c
c. F xmp, ax 1 (p-
ps 1.2.9.1 1.2.9.2) qs p-
s, cs c s
ps “ms
spk s s
p cmmcs.”
am pcp cs m
2003 ws p m c
m pcc. a
w pp (1.2.9.4) qs ps,
cs c s p-
s Mc 5, 2008, ms
m spcc c c-
pcc
sc (t a-1, p 13).
t pcc sc
cs sx vs: P-m (lv
1); em (lv 2); Pp
(lv 3); op (lv 4); ex
(lv 5); exp (lv 6). ec v
cs c pc, sc-
, vc, c, cmps
cs.
Minimum Profciency
Ps, cs c
s ps w cc -
ps w q
ms s lv 4 pcc,
wc s ccz
pcc sc s ws:
• Pc — “Pc,
sss, m
c s
v q - w s s.”
• Sc — “bsc mmc
scs sc ps
s cv s w-
c. es m cc, p-
c s xpc
ccmscs,
w m.”
• Vc — “Vc
ccc s sc
cmmc cv cmm,
cc wk- pcs.
C pps sccss
w ck vc s
xpc ccmscs.”
• Fc — “Pcs scs
ppp mp.t m ccs ss -
c s m s
mc spc sps
c, s s pv
cv cmmc. C mk
m s scs mks
ccs. Fs sc.”
• Cmps — “Cmps
s ms cc cmm, c-
c wk- pcs w
cc v s s s-
c - cmm ss. W
spk s c w
sc s cmpc
xpc vs,
cmps m sw
q cc ss.”
• ics — “rspss s-
mm, ppp
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 10/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
mv. is m-
s xcs v w -
w xpc
vs. ds q w
pp msss
cck, cm
c.”
Speech Samples
lm p
pcc
sc ws vp ss
PriCeSg s -
ss w w cc es
s. h s c m
c s pp w
ck scs.
t p c svc ms,
ps, cs, c s p-
s s s c, iCao s
vp cmpc sc (Cd) w
c spc smps csp lv 3,
lv 4 lv 5 pcc. lm s
Cd s v pcs m iCao
Mc 2006.
“Pp w cs,”
s. “t w , w xp-
s w s spcv
vs, k cc c c,
sc, pc s . T spc
smps xps w sw v
w w m w w s lv 4.”
Overall Ability
t ppx ax 1 cs “sc
scps” psc qms
v s spk
. acc sc scps,
ps, cs c s p-
s ms ms :
• “Cmmc cv vc-
(p/p) c--
c ss.” (dcm 9835 ss
vc- cmmc s m c
c--c cmmc cs
spk c s c xpsss,
ss p v
mss.)
• “Cmmc cmm, cc
wk- pcs w ccc c.”
• “us ppp cmmcv ss
xc msss cz
sv msss (.., cck,
cm c m) wk- cx.” (o xmp
cmmcv s s ps
pps mss w spk -
ms cp s
mss. “Smms, ps
‘s ’ s s s -
qs cc p,”
dcm 9835 ss.)
• “h sccss w v s
sc cs ps cm-
pc xpc vs ccs w cx wk
s cmmcv sk w wc
ws m.” (i ws,
ps, cs c s
ps ms v sc
pcc pv cmmc
kw w sm xpc
ccs.)
• “us c cc wc s
c cmm.” (a
scs vs ms s
xpc jm m
w css s c
cc m ,
dcm 9835 ps pp v
cp m spc p-
s s mk msvs
s.)
lv 6 pcc s w SarPs.
Pp 1.2.9.6 ax 1 qs ps,
cs c s ps
w ms lv 4 pcc lv 5
pcc s mslv 6 pcc.
rs scs w ss
v ss. iCao s cmm
s w ms lv 4 pcc
s v s s w
ms lv 5 pcc s v
sx s. rs s cmm f lv
6 pcc s ms.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 11/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
Standard Phraseology
b 2003, s “s ps-
” ws q SarPs. ax
10 (pp 5.1.1.1) w qs s
“iCao ps p w s-
z ps c sv smss.”
iCao ps s ps ax 10,
Vm ii, Cp 12 PanSatM
(Procedures or Air Navigation Services–Air rac
Management ). iCao ps s sm
scs m s pss ps
mm ss v cs w
iCao. F xmp, s iCao ps,
c w c cw “ p
w” w k cc; s-
u.S. F av ams (Faa)ps, c w c cw
x “ps ” w.
b d, iCao cc c mm
PriCeSg, s csscs
s pss s v ss
c cs cs m s.6
“Cv v mss m
ss v cmp cws
s m cs
s, s s cs cs cs,” d s.
dcm 9835 ss vs s iCao
s ps m q “-
” ps cs w v cm
ccsm pss.
“Ts cs ps s c
smp cs s q -v
es-spk cps cq es-
pcc iCao op
lv 4 s v c-
m iCao pss xcsv,”
cm ss.
Plain Language
a sz ps s -
q cmmc
sm ss mc
ss, c pp ss.
“l pcc m mmz
pss s q, xss
s w
ss iCao pss,” iCao s.7
Mws s s
spk “p es” c s qck - mc ss.
“Sc ccmscs m q c-
p c scp s-
z pss,” s s.8 “i ,
p c q cs
c cmmcs, xp
m. a sc -
sc ms m s
v ws pcc s
m spcc m sz
pss.”
exmps p p’s p
“ s w,” c’s
sc “p pss w
.”
Which Language?
ax 10 (pp 5.2.1.2.1) ws m
require, cmm,
cmmc “ cc
m s s .”a c ws or in the English
language.
“a vs s -
w es-s--sc-
s, pcc q-
ms pp
s -
c p cmmc-
s,” ss dcm 9835.
as s mm, cs
c s ps
pv svcs
ms cmmc es
w qs s
cw.
“as xmp, Sps s sp-
k s
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 12/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
ss m Mxc C amc
mc S amc,” dcm
9835 ss. “F s sc ss,
Sps es c s, es ms
m v. i ps
s spc m s es Sps.”
Onus on Operators
Pps ax 6 ax 11
2003 q cmmc cf
ps s ps m w
pcc ss -
c svc pvs s cs
m ss.
W s qms cms sps
cf ps c svc pv-
s vp s pcs.
ez Mws s s s 2008
s s ssv qs s-
s cc , s
ws mps p iCao s w
cs, wc q w cs s-
s cm ppc v s f
p.
“bcs , iCao s ss s-
s v sc vp
es- pcc,” s s.9 “tss
vp, s cc
vc pc m w ss
w s.”
exs es- p-
cc ss, sc s toeFl
(ts es s F
l), s -
cs s
cmps (.., s,
spk) s
c iCao -
pcc sc.
Mws s z-
cmps — c
w cmp, av es
Svcs (aeS) — c
vp pms
s pms p
s m iCao
qms.
bz, xmp, s vp pms
w v s 450 cs
ww s i s s
mms i a tsp
assc.
a pss m, wv, s pmc xs — ec’s p vs
Pcc es l a tc
Cs (Pela) s, wc ws -
vp 1994 s s cs.
a e, pjc ec
is a nv Svcs mm
PriCeSg, s Pela s cmps
w iCao’s lv 4 c.10
T Pela s, wc s ms es-
scs atC scs wv cmp - cs, s
ps:
• t s p vs c’s s-
q c w
spcc m v m c
p-c cmmcs;
• t sc p vs c’s
sp c msss
qss m ps;
• t p vs c’s
c s c-
p p c
s s atC
spvs; ,
• t p, wc s q sm
ec ss, vs c’s
pc atC cms w
es.
Profciency Takes Time
W dcm 9835 ss 100 s
200 s sc w q
c measurable mpvm
pcc, Mws sms , p
-v spk’s s v es
pcc, 200 s 800 s sc-
pc w q m lv
4 qms.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 13/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
Mws s w es- p-
cc qms “mk k
cs” ps cs vv
ps.
b c csqcs, “ cmc
pcsss s c svcpvs c sv ps cs
cs p
cs cmpc w iCao -
pcc qms,” ss dcm
9835.
Mws s s c
s wk.
“t s c w
s’ cmc
ps’ cs; ’ s, s ss w ,” s s. “t
ws s ms v, -
ss , s cp w
.”
Mws s cv pm
w c cmp-s s spp-
m cssm ccmm
scs ps cs. a
sjc-m spcss w s -
jc, ms cc pm
q es cs.
“Ms pp v c es s
s — w c spk es c
c es,” s s. “T s mspcp.
l c s proession.”
iCao ss pmm sc w v
-v qcs c-
, pcc xpc c v
es s sc xpc s
p c. Mmm qcs
cc c es s sc
, xpc c “ wk w w sjc-m
xp.”
iCao cmms q es sc-
s w v xpc p w
v sjc-m spcss.
“W s not cv s
cc xps pv pm
vm -
cc,” dcm 9835
ss. “W vs w
xpc c
c ck mk v-
( css) sjc-
m xps c c, sk
teaching csss -
vp ppp
ms s -
c x-
ps m vps.”
iCao s scs v v
es spks.
“n-v scs c, xmp,
s- xpc sc- c,” ss
dcm 9835.
a cmm c s w j-spcc cmps
ps, cs c s
ps s k, Mws s, s-
w v vw
(c--c v p) qss
ps cmp pm.
“i s p--pp s,” s s. “ts
ms vv m s -
m, w v c.”
iCao cmms ss cm s-
s vp i l
ts assc (ilta), cmmc,
p z.
“ts ss vps c ilta
c cs s c s s
vpm s pccs m
ss,” ss dcm 9835, wc cs
ilta c cs.
‘Natives’ Not Exempt
aall ps, cs c
s ps w cc
ps ms m pcc
qms, iCao s s -
v wm es s s v
k c css vw
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 14/36
0 Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
psv s’s cs -
, m v
s v spc mpm
“ppp s” cc
cs cmmc.
iCao cmms s w lv6 pcc mk mpv
c s
smsss s s
ps, m
spc v s “-
,” sc s ms
cqsms.
a m s xpss
spc c
ws cs. F xmp, p
m s, “W’ ss c,” ckw c’s sc
c sp, “W’
” p mss ppc (iCao
s ps p
mss ppc s “ ”).
Cqsms m xpsss
sc s “” “ ” “’”
“s’.”
No Cure-all
a cs s smss ( k) ss-
ms sws pms sc
c c cmmc,
cmmc k w
v m.
“W k ssms w, ,
mpv v cmmcs
sm vs, pss mpv cc
s, s c sc
ssms w v qm
cmmc sks,”Mws s.11 “t w c
cmmc
mc ss
s ckp ssm .”
as s cmm-
c xss, cmmc w
c ps sk v
s.
“Cmmc s w p
v cmp m; wv,cmpc w iCao
pcc qms w
spks m cz s
wk w sccss s
s msss,” ss
dcm 9835.■
Notes
1. i Cv av oz
(iCao). dcm 9835. Manual on
the Implementation o ICAO Language
Prociency Requirements. 2004.
2. Mws, ez. “Pvss
Pcc Cmm av
l b S.” ICAO
Journal Vm 56 (ap 2001).
3. lm, P. tp vw
lc, Mk. ax, V,
u.S. F. 16, 2006. F S
F, ax, V, u.S.
4. F S F (FSF)
appc-- acc
rc (alar) tsk Fc. “Ks
av: FSF tsk Fc PssFcs a appc--
C---
accs.” Flight Saety Digest Vm 17
(nvmdcm 1998) Vm
18 (JF 1999).
5. iCao. dcm 9835.
6. d, b. “h awss
Cmmc Ps C b
S.” ICAO Journal Vm 59
(JF 2004).
7. iCao. Background Inormation to
Proposed Amendments Concerning Language Prociency or Radiotelephony
Communications. acm F S
l an 13/48.2-02/1.
8. Mws. ICAO Journal .
9. Mws. ivw lc, Mk.
ax, V, u.S. dc. 10, 2005.
F S F, ax,
V, u.S.
10. e, a. “up ts Sss
nw rqm dms es
l Pcc.”ICAO Journal
Vm 59 (JF 2004).
11. Mws. ICAO Journal .
Further Reading From
FSF Publications
nv, Mc; Wk, Mc b. “ass
Cw Cvss Pvs iss
acc ivs.” Flight Saety Digest
Vm 24 (oc 2005).
FSF e S. “Cw ls b-777
rw Sc Cs tk.” Airport
Operations Vm 31 (Spmoc
2005).
FSF e S. “ep a tc
Cs ass ic Pv
rw icss.” Airport Operations
Vm 30 (Mcap 2004).
FSF e S. “Mm lpss,
Mscmmc, iq C
C s Ms Cmm Css tw
Cs’ es.” Airport Operations
Vm 27 (Spmoc 2001).
FSF e S. “us S
Ps F Cws a tc
Cs Cs acf emcs.”
Airport Operations Vm 26 (Mcap
2000).
up, S. “es-
t a tc Cs Ms
g b bsc atC Vc.” Airport
Operations Vm 23 (Spmoc
1997).
K, r l. “excss Ws, P
rcks Sc h ass PatC
Cmmc es.” Airport Operations
Vm 23 (JF 1997).
Cs, Sv. “Pa tc C
Cmmcs: i’s n (o) W y
S, i’s hw y S i.” Flight Saety Digest
Vm 14 (J 1995).
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 15/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
Appendix A
International Standards and
Recommended Practices
Relating to Language Use in
Radio Communications
Annex 1 to the Convention on
International Civil Aviation:
Personnel Licensing; Chapter 1,
Defnitions and General Rules
Concerning Licences
1.2.9.1 [ap] cp ps s
vs w q s -
p cf s ms
spk s s
p cmmcs.
Note — Pursuant to Article 42 o the Convention
on International Civil Aviation, paragraph
1.2.9.1 does not apply to personnel whose [li-
censes] are originally issued prior to 5 March
2004 but, in any case, does apply to personnel
whose [licenses] remain valid aer 5 March
2008.
1.2.9.2 a c cs c
s ps s ms
spk s s p cmmcs.
1.2.9.3 rcmm — F s,
ps s v
spk s s
p cmmcs.
1.2.9.4 as 5 Mc 2008, [p]
cp ps, c cs -
c s ps s ms
spk s s
p cmmcs vspc pcc qms
[appx 1].
1.2.9.5 rcmm — [ap] -
cp ps, vs q s
p c, -
c cs c s ps
s ms spk -
s s p
cmmcs v spc
pcc qms [appx 1].
1.2.9.6 as 5 Mc 2008, p-
cc [p] cp ps, c
cs c s ps w
ms pcc w exp lv(lv 6) s m v vs
ccc w v’s ms
pcc v.
1.2.9.7 rcmm — T p-
cc [p] cp ps,
vs q s p
cf, c cs c s-
ps w ms pcc w
exp lv (lv 6) s m v-
vs ccc w v’s
ms pcc v, s ws:
) ts ms pcc
op lv (lv 4) s
v s c v s;
,
) ts ms pcc
ex lv (lv 5) s
v s c v sx s.
Note 1 — Formal evaluation is not required or
applicants who demonstrate expert language
prociency, [that is,] native and very procient non-native speakers with a dialect or accent
intelligible to the international aeronautical
community.
Note 2 — Te provisions o 1.2.9 reer to Annex
10, Volume II, Chapter 5, whereby the language
used or radiotelephony communications may be
the language normally used by the station on the
ground or English. In practice, thereore, there
will be situations whereby fight crew members
will only need to speak the language normally
used by the station on the ground.
Appendix 1 [to Annex 1]:
Requirements or Profciency in
Languages Used or Radiotelephony
Communications
t m pcc qms c-
Cp 1, Sc 1.2.9, ppc
[cs] [cs] s ms,
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 16/36
Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006
L a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y
m ccp cs ,
cmpc w [w] sc scp-
s … w iCao [i Cv
av oz] op lv (lv
4) iCao l Pcc r Sc
[p 13].
Pc spks s:
) Cmmc cv vc- (-
p/p) [ss]
c--c ss;
b) Communicate on common, concrete and
work-related topics with accuracy and
c;
c) us ppp cmmcv ss
xc msss cz
sv msss (.., cck,cm c m)
wk- cx;
) h sccss w v s
sc cs ps
cmpc xpc vs
ccs w cx
wk s cmmcv sk w
wc ws m; ,
) us c cc wc s
c cmm.
Annex 6 to the Convention on
International Civil Aviation:
Operation o Aircrat; Part I:
International Commercial Air
Transport — Aeroplanes
3.1.6 ops s s cw mm-
s ms spk s
s c p
cmmcs s spc ax 1.
Annex 6 to the Convention onInternational Civil Aviation:
Operation o Aircrat; Part III:
International Operations —
Helicopters
1.1.3 ops s s cw
mms ms spk
s s p
cmmcs s spc ax 1.
Annex 10 to the Convention
on International Civil Aviation:
Aeronautical Telecommunications;
Volume II: Communication
Procedures Including Those With
PANS [Procedures or Air Navigation
Services] Status; Chapter 5, Aeronautical Mobile Service — Voice
Communications
5.1.1 i cmmcs, s s-
scp s sv ms.
5.1.1.1 iCao sz ps s
s ss wc s spc-
. o w sz ps c
sv smss, p
s s.
5.2.1.2.1 T - p cm-mcs s cc
m s s
es .
Note 1 — Te language normally used by the
station on the ground may not necessarily be
the language o the State in which it is located.
A common language may be agreed upon
regionally as a requirement or stations on the
ground in that region.
Note 2 — Te level o language prociency
required or aeronautical radiotelephony
communications is specied in the Appendix
to Annex 1.
5.2.1.2.2 T es s v,
qs m cf s, ss
sv s ps
s s svcs.
Annex 11 to the Convention on
International Civil Aviation: Air
Trafc Services
2.28.1 a c svc pv s s
c cs spk s
(s) s p cmm-
cs s spc ax 1.
2.28.2 excp w cmmcs w
c c s cc m-
, es s
s sc cmmcs.■
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 17/36
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 18/36
14 FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
AVIATION STATISTICS
Global Passenger-mortality RiskDecreased Substantially in
Accidents From 2000 to 2005
The risk of dying in an accident aboard a randomly chosen flight was lower than ever in the
period 2000–2005, in every industry segment examined. When passenger fatalities during the
terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were included, however, passenger-mortality risk did not
decrease on U.S. scheduled domestic passenger jet flights compared with the period 1990–1999.
— ARNOLD BARNETT, PH.D.
[FSF:iap2000Flight Saety Digest ,abaxW
pvsspss-msk
—s,sscppss
mcs—ww
scjps19871996.1
bssqppsscs
c1990s.2iwc,
zsssksmJ.1,
2000,dc.31,2005.]
M100mscsw
ccw’spsss20002005.3Tpvsc
sscscsv-
ps.Scspssss
cswpmc,wcs
mpspcskmm.
Tswpss-msk
sscwvccsscs
smssps
ws(avcWmscjs;avcWjs;
jswavcWcs
dvpWcs;jsw
dvpW;avcW-j
mscs).4Sscsscs
mpvmsks
cc.ipsmsc
mscswavcW
—w’sss—s
wdvpW,mjs
cc-skcvcv.
Psssscspss-
mskwssc.
Tmsccvs
zscskc.
Ts,wv,cpp
mpvm.a ssc
ccmpsss,c
vpss-msk.im
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 19/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
S t a t i S t i c S
ps,scksSp.11,
2001,kmpp(cvcms
)pvsvs
ckscm.ass,wsps-
sswscs
ccs,swsqv-
cscc-pss-msk20002005scu.S.
mscjs.
Q-statistic
tcms2000Flight
Saety Digest c1svpps
wsQ-ssc,wcpssmortal-
ity risk or a passenger on a randomly chosen ight .
TQ-sscswsqs:“gv
psscssmw
ss(..,u.K.mscps-
sjs19901999),ws
ppsssvv
?”
a ight sssppmc
(scp);“svv-
”sssmscs
vcccm/sm.(Css
,scspss
-mcv,xc.)
t Q-ssc s ccp vscmpwmsms
pss-msk.5,6rcc-
ccspssp
vvcc,Q-sscws
ccc proportion psss
k,wcss:
• isss ccw
svvmwwsvvs
svvs;
• isvcs c-ssccpp
vvcc(..,wps-
sjsm,kv
,smpcssm
wps-);
,
• issc
,csmjccs
cck/cmppc/
.7
Mv,Q-sscsscc
s.TQ-sscssm:
Q = V/N
w Q=Q-ssc
V=m-ssqvs
sns
n=mvs
T ull-loss equivalent spppss-
swsvv.(Fxmp,
scmps,-ssqv-
sz;30pcpsssk
cc,-ssqvs0.3;pssskcc,-
ssqvs1.0.)8aspps
nsvsvV.
TQ-sscssssss
c.
Zero Accident Risk
ipvsss,scavcW
mscjsvss
w.d19901999,Q-sscws113m.a,psswk
mscvw
v36,000s
cc.9
a v pss s
1990savcWscmscj
pswcsccs
cm/scs.Csccs
,pss-m20002005
mpv,sswt1(p16).
d20002005,wppxm
75m scmscjs
avcWcs(mj c-
c uSs).npss-
wscsccany s
s.10
isms,pss-m
skcv.bcs
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 20/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200616
S t a t i S t i c S
mpvmcmpw1990sp-
smcc?evsscp-
cssssvm,ssps
cmmsvvsccqck
sccss,spswps
wvs.
Smccsmsp.
bs-ccm1990s
-cvvs20002005,6.0
-ssqvswvxpc-wJ.1,2000,dc.31,2005,
avcWmscjsvcs.Tsv,
xpmp19901999,w
sm10ccswc
vpppssskw
55pc.ic,wz
ccs,wv,10.Scscpc
sxcwp
scc.
Spcc,ppxmavc
Wmscjswcc19902005wcc2000
2005.(dqcsw
ssxsp19902005
s.)Ts,s19902005
smpvvm
cc,ppxm10cc-
s19902005svcc
20002005.n,wv,s
skcccccs
sms10mswcss.T
ps500,wcmsv
sscscccmm
ssscc.
A World of Improvement
t2psxpt1
psss.
t 2sws, pscs-
,scpss-jps
avcWcsw
pss-mskdvp
W.asss,spspvj,
1960.10
Ppsmsk,wv,s
psscpssjps,
pss-mskpwsw-
2000200519901999.b
100pcc
pss-m sk avcW
Table 1
Passenger-mortality Risk
From Accidents, Advanced World
Scheduled Domestic Jet Operations,
2000–2005
Q-statistic
United States 0
Other Advanced WorldCountries
0
Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened
as the statistical probability o a passenger dying on a
randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstoptrip rom one city to another (also called a “departure”).
The Advanced World comprises countries that
are generally considered economically advanced,
technically advanced and democratic: Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South
Arica, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom
and the United States.
Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.
Table 2Passenger-mortality Risk From Accidents During
Various Scheduled Passenger Jet Operations,
1990–1999 and 2000–2005
Type of Service
Q-statistic
1990–1999 2000–2005
Advanced World Domestic 1 in 13 million 0
Advanced World International 1 in 6 million 1 in 8 million
Between Advanced World andDeveloping World
1 in 1 million 1 in 1.5 million
Within Developing World 1 in 500,000 1 in 2 million
Note: These data exclude atalities caused by terrorist/criminal acts.
Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o a
passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom
one city to another (also called a “departure”).
The Advanced World comprises countries that are generally considered economically
advanced, technically advanced and democratic: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada,
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Developing World
comprises all other countries.
Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 21/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
S t a t i S t i c S
mscps,swt2,
wsw75pc-
cswdvp
W.Tsccsss-
csc:gvm
ccsvv,w
c75pccspss-msk
cc.
iwpsps—avc
W i bw
avcWdvpW
—csspss-m
skw1990ss
20002005wsm
wpsps.Mv,
scsswsvw
ccs,19901999p 20002005p,s
csQ-sscm
cssmc.
hwv,cxww
cspss-msk
—wcv
pscmwsssc
sc—mmps
ccpmsmpvms
mcssss
psssmssms“s-
scs”(..,wpcc
m).
as,ssmp
mpcswpss-
mskcscss
20002005.Tps
mjcskpc,ws
cccs-msk
ck.
Other Continuing
Improvement
iss-jp-s(vvcpc-
cfppcf)m
cscs,cw
spcs,sms
pppcfs
wpc
js.i cb
W,1Q-sscu.S.msc
pp/pppswss-
ms12m19871996.
t3swscss
mcps.
Competitive Routes
tcs,
w avcW s
wvQ-sscs
dvpWs,-
csswc
smwcscm-
p,m,wavcWcdvpWc
(..,Ps,Fc,Kc,Pks).
TQ-sscws1600,000
scscss.
Tspspss
ssmcs
pss-msw
avcWsdvp
Wsm
cscs
ms.
t4(p18)swssmp
ssp.
tscssw-pws
s:When two airlines lying
passenger jets ly the same route, very
rarely is there any statistically valid
reason related to saety to preer one to
the other .Fxmp,m
20002005ssw-cs
mscjcsavc
Wwmzs-
cs:ops
s,Q-sscwszv
mmss.
Increased Threat of
Terrorism
apcm-
spsw
csss
p.hsc,ccsvc-
cmjv
s:i1990s,ws
scscm-
smavc
W.oSp.11,2001,wv,
psssu.S.mscs
wkss.12t5(p
18)ssss“vs”
ccpss-m
skcs.
ts,Q-ssc
ccswscz,Q-
sscpsssc
smcm/smwm
z11m.(i,cs
ccs,mssm
ppwkSp.11s
u.S.mscjccs1990s
in total .)
tscscmcssv
cpss-msk
scpssjps
Table 3
Passenger-mortality Risk for
Scheduled Non-jet Operations,
Advanced World,
1990–1999 and 2000–2005
Period Q-statistic
1990–1999 1 in 2.5 million
2000–2005 1 in 5 million
Note: These numbers exclude terrorist/
criminal acts, but there were no such acts on
these services during 1990–2005.
Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is
dened as the statistical probability o a
passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight.
A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom one
city to another (also called a “departure”).
The Advanced World comprises countries
that are generally considered economically
advanced, technically advanced and
democratic: Australia, Austria, Belgium,
Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand,
Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom
and the United States.
Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 22/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200618
S t a t i S t i c S
dvpW.t6swscs
scwjsrss
CQ-sscsdvp
W.13
n20pcmskt
6scmsm.T,c--(75pc)mpvmsw
t2,sscwwccs,ws
cc--(67pc)v
mpvm.
Threat of Hostile Acts
iww,pss-mskmccsmpv20002005.
Wc,ccmscs
msmcmpcc
s.
Tsssxpcpc
sccspss-msk
ms/cmcs.iss
kwwSp.11ws.a
pcmsmvc:T1990s,
wwpsss
sm/cm,wpcss
s/cmcs 1980swc,
mmcsqcs,sP
amcF103,utaF772Pcc
SwsasF1771,14wcsvvs.Tsws
1990,sc.Cs-
cmssmkwsvsss
s.iw,wv,
smsswccsv
sccsswscssvcsks
m.■
Notes
1. b,a.;W,a.“PssMrsk
esmsPvPspcvsaaS.”
Flight Saety Digest Vm19(ap2000).
2. b,a.bckMmlc.“aS:
ega?” Journal o the Operational
Research Society Vm52(as2001).
3. tppxmmsscc,
ssmpcqs
wwscsOfcial Airline Guide
(oag).(Tcqsscssb
W,op.cit .,p.12.)Tmssjc
smsmpmpcs,
Table 4
Passenger-mortality Risk for Nonstop Scheduled Jet Routes
Between Advanced World Countries and Developing World
Countries, 2000–2005
Category Q-statistic
Advanced World Airlines 1 in 1.5 million
Developing World Airlines 1 in 1.5 million
Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o a
passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom
one city to another (also called a “departure”).
The Advanced World comprises countries that are generally considered economically
advanced, technically advanced and democratic: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada,
Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Developing World
comprises all other countries.
Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.
Table 5
Passenger-mortality Risk, by Cause, U.S. Scheduled Domestic
Passenger Jet Operations, 1990–1999 and 2000–2005
Period
Q-statistic
Accidents Terrorism/Crime Combined Causes
1990–1999 1 in 11 million 0 1 in 11 million
2000–2005 0 1 in 11 million 1 in 11 million
Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o apassenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom
one city to another (also called a “departure”).
Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.
Table 6
Passenger-mortality Risk, by Cause, Developing World
Scheduled Jet Operations, 2000–2005
Q-statistic
Accidents Terrorism/Crime Combined Causes
1 in 2 million 1 in 10 million 1 in 1.5 million
Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o a
passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom
one city to another (also called a “departure”).
The Developing World comprises all countries other than Australia, Austria, Belgium,
Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 23/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
S t a t i S t i c S
mpcssmss
ccscs
ccss.
4. Fppsssc,
avcWcmpsscs
cscm-
cvc,ccvc
mcc:as,as,bm,
C,dmk,F,Fc,
gm,gc,ic,i,is,
i,Jp,lxm,ns,
nwZ,nw,P,S
ac,Sp,Sw,Swz,
uKmuSs.
acs,ssc
(s38),
sdvpW.
5. Fmsvs
smpss-msk,s
bW,op. cit .,pp.12.
6. b,a.;hs,M.K.“aS:
Tlsdc.” Management Science
Vm35(J1989).
7. bCmmcaps.Statistical
Summary o Commercial Jet Airplane
Accidents, 1959–2004.M2005.
8. tmms-ssqv-
sscs,s
csccsscmp
aS.cm,aSnwk,
u.S.ntspSb
Flight International .
9.Tccwmm
sccQ-sscs.
Cwmmsks
psssk.Fxmp,c
cwmmsmkv
jccs
fswmspsss
swsss.F
cwmmsccwmms
mcf
mcpssvcs
cmp,wcmcsm-
skcwmms.
10. apssswss-
jwu.S.mscjp
wCc,is,u.S.,2005,
pswsk.
11. b,a.;am,M.;Scmm,
V.“aS:Tlsdc.”
Management ScienceVm35(J
1989).
12. oSp.11,2001,u.S.sw
jckss.twcf
(amcasF11u
asF175)ww
WtC,nwyk,nw
yk,u.S.acf(amc
asF77)wsw
PWs,d.C.,u.S.uasF93sck
Psv,u.S.,fpsss
mpcm
jcks.o-s(c-
sjcks)c81
psss,s
wpsamcF11;56ps-
ss,svsw
psuF175;58pss-
s,swps
amcF77;37pss-
s,vswps
uF93.
13. oa.24,2004,wrsss
wswms
.atpvt-234asck
wwMscw,rss,
V,w35psss
cwmmsk.at-154b
sckmMscw
Sc,w38psss
cwmms.tcs
xpsvwwck
ps.
aMcddsMd-82ws-
swscksd,
C,M7,2002.Fsc
103pssscwmms.
accmps,s
ccwcwcc
wpsp
c.ncw
vssc
cf’sssmss.S
pssssspc.
14. PamcF103kp
vlck,Sc,dc.
12,1988.axpsvc,p
Smx,s/
cssp
vcf
l,e.Fsc243
psss,sws16cwmms
11pp.
oSp.19,1989,ustsps
aés(uta)F772,Mcd
dsdC-10-30,wssw
kpvm
Sdsn.Tvs
csxps
ccwc.i
2003,lmsps
pcmpsss
156psss14cwmm-
swwk.
PccSwsas(PSa)F
1771wsmlsas,
C,u.S.,SFcsc,
C,wcwp
ssc
scmcc
bsaspc(ba)146-200’s-
sp.Wsssps
cfspvc
mpc,k38psss
vcwmms.Tvs
mx-mp
wmpfssmpcs,
wcs,
spsswps
spssss.hsw
ps.
About the Author
ab,P.d.,sgesm
PssMmScc
Msscssistc(Mit)
SScMm,ops
rscC.hsspcsppm-
mcmssspcmp-
c,wvsspm
smpss.hsxsvcs-
xpcv,vwk
vps,14s,u.S.F
avams(Faa)u.S.
tspScams
(tSa).hsc-cFaan
Cexccavops
rscSFC
Sgavis.i2002,
cvps’scmF
SF.d.bsc-
ppmmcs.
dvCzwsksss
sc,’sFaacc
m,KFz,pvc-
m.Tswkwssppp
gavCS
FpFaa.Psvw
scmcpss
SFFaa.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 24/36
20 FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
PUBLICATIONS
RECEIVED AT FSF JERRY LEDERER
AVIATION SAFETY LIBRARY
Increased Automation WillBring New Human FactorsChallenges to ATM
Air traffic management (ATM) human factors specialists are working to
anticipate, and thus avoid, problems associated with greater automation.
– FSF LIBRARY STAFF
Books
Human Factors Impacts in Air rafc
Management.Kw,b;rs,Mk;
Scä,dk(s).as,e:
as,2005.584pp.Fs,s,x,
cs,ss.
r cmpx,cs-mcpccscs-
cmm(atM).“Tss
mcsmscm
sccsatM,ms
mscscsppm
ms,”ss.
ocsmcwkvs
ccscpss
pcmpmx
wksvpmpsvscc,scckpc
sps.
“Sccsmcsmpc-
s,” ss.“Ts
mmssqss
wk,sswss
sm,swssk
cvssw,
scsmvs
m.”
Tssmcps
scmmsv,sc
sssmcss
cckps,mcxpc
wpssatM.
“Tmscp
pvscscccss
sppcsm-
,”ss.“Wwvm
cszvcs,
sss
vpms,spps—
vvccswcs
csssswssm
ccatMv.”
Tssmws“pc
kwcwcssw
mcsmpc”(..,
cmpp c cmc
ss).a20spcsspvcps
mpszpcsm.
Tss s cpscs
ms:
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 25/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
R e s o u R c e s
• hmcsps(..,cs
psvpcs);
• hmcsmscs(..,
mpvms-sccsss);
• hmcsms(..,ms-ccpmc);,
• hm cspms(..,
m cs cmp
pcwkpcc).
Understanding and Managing Risk Attitude.
hs,dv;M-Ws,r.
as,e:gw,2005.206pp.
ts,s,p,x.
“tmspcsskmmckwscc
sccss,vsw
wsmspcc,w
mpcvfcm
vskpcss,”ss.“a
pp-cppcskmm
wssssswsks
sm.Tsw
pvpccswv-
s,smsskpsss
sssvpss
pcc,swsmmz
mpcsswsksm
cpcv.”
Tkxpsmcsspcs
skmm,spcp
“mc.”Tsm
s“czms,s
ms,pppxpssms
wms.”ok’spmss
smscp,,pp
msk.
emccfcwspcsskmm,ss:-
ccs;ccssssm
p;ccssssmjcvs;
skspscss.
gps,swsvs,cvs
“sk.”Tsspsc
xpsssccpccscss“p-
k”(mmspmsppss
ss);“Mssc”(fps’s
skspspsp-
cspmms);“ccm”
(csmkmcspcv
zms);“sks”(c
pmsksks-
vmmscs ck vcc);“css”(pps
sks,wpsw
wskvscsvmpss
pscccs
psppssmsps
skk).
Tsscvss-
mmskmm,s
cmpxj,smps.
Tsc“csjcvs
sscvm-pssss”;“mpvmv,
vsps”;“m
cvmwk,s
sscmm.”
A Personal Guide or Cabin and Cockpit
Sel Deense.Cz,dvd.bm,
i,u.S.:ahs,2005.141pp.
Fs.
“F
spsv
xcpcw
,”ss , pcc, m
u.S.Msccsscw
vcmssks.“a30,000,
pc.”
dspcsvscsc
psss’svssm,
smpssmpwps,
ss.usvv,vsc-
csmss,cs,
cps,ppcmpsscs
ccmmpvswps.
n,ss,spssvc-
sswsms.apsswpps
vckps
mcmc,cs
smccvs
wscfsmcs
ssc,ss
pswscpm
cckp.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 26/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200622
R e s o u R c e s
Tkscssswp-
psmscqs
ssw“cscscvss,
smpc,pcs-
qsss.”
Mv,mppssssmpspscsswsccs,
ss.afpmsxpc
vszmpskv
ccmscmpsps,ms
vsz spss w v
mc.avcss
mccss,smpc
“v,spcs,m
ssc,sssc,s
sc,smsc.”
Reports
erminal Radar Approach Control: Measures o
Voice Communications Perormance.Pz,o.
Vk;McC,Mk.u.S.Fav
ams(Faa)ocaspc
Mc.dot/Faa/aM-05/19.Fp.
oc2005.22pp.avvi
<www..v//ps>
ntccimSvc.*
asu.S.naspcSsmvvs
mscsc
vc cmmcs ssm -
cmpsssssms
ssms,smssmcm
pcpcmmcsmm.em
ssmswvcmps
wxsssmsccpmc
mssscssp,vcsm,
psmsspp.
Tspscs“ssp”pv
jcvqpmcmss
ccmmcsssmscsssvx
cmmcsssms.
Tsz8,000vcsms-
ssmvmppcc
(traCon)cswsm
ps48csuSs.T
cmmcsccp
wscwsmsss.
“ov,w13-s-
msssvmsmp,”
pss.“tpc,cps--kswc
wspss,cmmcs81m-
scs.ik2.5scs
mss, 127mscsps
ps--kswcwss.”
Tssck,spp-
cppsmsssw,sp
cms1.16pc
smpsmsss.bcssps
qmssxcs
svm-spms,
v14.54mssswsm-
wps cswsps
wps,v9.90msssw
smwwssp.
Flight Saety Special Issue: Bird Strike
Prevention.FSF(FSF)
tw.J2005.147pp.Fs,s,
pps.avmFSFtw.**
tbSkCmmtw(bSCtW)
wsssFSF
(FSF)sszFSFtw2001
cscvvscs
mvscspsv
skpm.dws,
bSC-tWpscspcv
ssmsp,wcspszs.
“bSC-tW[ws]sccp‘[c-
cw]fsssps
psvs’pvpp-
pmssspsswm
pspcsps,s
scssks
mwmmzskcs,”
sspc’sc.
osskpvms-
sccwssm
pss.TtwCvacs
ams1998ps
sjcws.apss
pswcmps
pmswfps.
“hwv,vw,fpsv
spvps,”c
ss.“ivsswsmp
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 27/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
R e s o u R c e s
sswsmc
fs.”
bSC-tWccwp-mwks
spcvps
scwppws
mwsssss.
“Tpss…wf
ssss,”c
ss.“Tmwspss[tp]
SSaps.Tpss
sswsmcc
w[tpcvm].”
acspw-
s:“tCcpbSkPv,”
“TeqpmtcqsbSk
Pv,”“bSkMic
im,”“iacvsbSkPv,”“TacvsbSk
Pvtw,”“bSkass.”
Level Bust Study Using Saety Principles.
ecexpmC.rp.
402.J2006.gzv,a;b,
C;Ps,J.81pp.Fs,s.
avesFcvi
<www.c.>.
i2003,ecxpp-
ssvss(vsmsss)smc
SMart(SMmasssc
rct).
“SMartscxc
‘ssss’mpvssp-
ps-csmk,” p
ss.“TkSMartsmk
smpsvsccs
xpc(ssss,..,
sqpm,z,,p-
cs),ps.”
Tsmcssss—cscs
cscs—ssssm
cswpcsv
ss,cvmvssm
csqcs.tscscs
pcps(SPs).
Tsscpz35
cvscsmsSPs,
mwcvcvcSPws
c.
amp’sccssw:
• “tcssms
wkpv,swksswspcccp
s(s‘pvc’),
ccv”;,
• “icmpxsspc k
tMas[mmvs],
svjcsssc
smvs.tssms
,[]v/v
mss.dp
sscvs
vwsckvsmcmcsss
cv.tcvsc
sspsw,[]s[]s
tCaS[c-csvc
ssm]pvcsv.”
Risk Factors Associated with Weather-Related
General Aviation Accidents. u.S.n
tspSb(ntSb).ntSb/
SS-05/01.Spm2005.78pp.Fs,
s,ppxs,ps,ss.av
vi<www.s.v>m
ntccimSvc.*
tspscsntSbsws
spcs
skcssscwsm
mccs(iMC)wvs-
.rscsccm72
vccsccwas
2003ap2004.tscss-
vwps135swp
vcmsccs.
i,u.S.Favams(Faa)cspvmps
ccfs-ccfs,c-
sss.
Sscssws
vssscwskw-
vccs.
Ts’sccsscw:
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 28/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200624
R e s o u R c e s
• “Psws
wskvvw-
vccs
wsw,
[mcv]sccs
pcccvvm
m[cc]”;
• “Pc vm
cssspsm
w-kwsks”;,
• “Kwpcc-s s
sscwskp
vvw-
vcc.”
Instructional and
Management Guides
Saety Management Systems: Te Senior Airline
Manager’s Implementation Guide.Fs.
M,Qc,C:ia
tspassc(iata),oc2005.
Fs,pps,p,xs.
avmiata.***
asmmssm(SMS)siatas“ssmcmm
skssscwfps,
psc
mccvscvvsspmc.”
Tssspvpccm-
svmpm
SMS.Tswc
SMS,wscs“op
SPm,”“emcrspsPm,”
“iataSMmSppSsm”
“impm.”
Electronic Media
Cabin Operations Saety oolkit: urbulence
Management & Inadvertent Slide Deployment
Prevention; Cabin Saety Management
Systems. Sc.M,Qc,
C:iatspassc
(iata),J2006.avmiata.***
apcwkpmiataCopsStskFc,
ss2004,scmpcscks
spscs,sc-
smsvpss
cc-jsv-
spms.Tsscs
psssmmssms.
Tkcscmmpv
pcs,sc/ccss,
mcsss
xscss,mms
ccpscsssmps.
Psscsc’ss
cssmwksps.
Cspvmpc-
m m(PdF)s,McsPwP
pssiks.
Regulatory Materials
Synthetic Vision and Pathway Depictions
on the Primary Flight Display.u.S.F
avams(Faa)avs
Cc(aC)23-26.dc.22,2005.18pp.
appx.avmFaavi
<www.w..v>.
tsaCpssccpms,
ms,swcmpc
wu.S.Favrs(Fars)P23, Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility,
Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes,
wwccpssmps:(1)sc
vs(2)pwpcssp
vcs pmfsp.
TsaCssswccps-
wspm.■
Sources
*ntccimSvc
5285Prr
Sp,Va22161u.S.
i:<www.s.v>
**FSFtw
51,8F,n.51,Kr,Sc.2
tp110twr.o.C.
*** iatspassc(iata)
800PcVc
P.o.bx113
Mh4Z1M1Qc,C
i:<www..>
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 29/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
Cleaning Solvent Blamed for B-777Landing Gear Fire
Investigators found that the subsequent evacuation exceeded certification time limits and that
passengers were not led to a secure area.
— FSF EdIToRIAL STAFF
Twmpvs
wsspmswc
sccccsmpv
.acc/cs
spmmmv-
mcs,vzs,pss
mscs.Tsmmcc.
Fire Leads to
Recommendations or
Expeditious Evacuations
Boeing 777. Minor damage. 31 minor injuries.
afmPks,fcwc-
cmp-cpppcmcpe.
a“smm”cw,cw
xpwspp
xwsscmmcw
c.
acvccx
ws(),cwmm-
pjcws,
c’sqc,swfms
ccp’sm.
Tcwspppxw,
csc(arFF)ps-
wcxs.TarFF
wccmmsvwppcsmsmkcm-
mvcp
s.
Pssscwmmsvc,s
vcsss
p.T-psssvarFF
pscvmjs
vc.evc332psssws
cmpms10scss
vcswsp;
wms30scs,scwmmvc.avcp,pss-
scsvcss.W
ssvpssswkwm,
pssspsswww-
svwss.
Tvs“msk
smmcpccsw
cwss,”cc
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT BRIEFS
A I R
C A R R I E R
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 30/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200626
A c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s
ps.“iwsksm-
msfmmsv,wcw
cmcsmcw
cmcm.Tcc
scw
c,wk-pckmp
wskvpv-s.”
Tvss,
wccmmvm
smkcssspw
,cwssvsms
“”cpssm.
Fmcs
m,ps.Ts
qckwscwc
.10w.
i,vs
vckcsmm
vcmqccc
—qmspsss
vc90scss
c’svxs.
assvs,u.K.a
accsivsbcss
cmms:
• tu.K.Cvava(Caa)
vwscpsss
wvvcmc
“scswmsc
c, [] s v
m/mcs s-
ssspc”;
• tvwsccw
“ws,
vvccmmv
ccmm,vc
scs xps spss,
spcvckcpcvccw”;
• tCaa q, smps,
“qccccm-
mcswc
[arFFsvc],vcc
cc,sm
v ppppm”;
,
•tCaaq“cm-
mcqcsc
ccmmcswc
[arFFsvc],v
ccc,s
c,mp-
cssscccvs.”
Tps19scswk
sb-777pswpw
J1999J2006,wcc
pwsss.os,sw
xcssvs,vsw
svscw
cmps, ws
ck;cssvs
kw.
‘Robust Monitoring’
Recommended or
Loading Procedures
Airbus A340. No damage. No injuries.
dfmeJp,
fcwwsp’sc-
v(Cg)wssw
wm.Tpmws cc
mvpsssw
p,wswsc
swc.Tfwsc
s,wcwccm
.
Tp’sSSvcsdpm-
vcw
v.Tcps,w
cwsw,sccsw
,cmpwwsc
wsm.
“Tswssqccc-
cscscs[pp];scsssw
m,”ps.
i,vswk
c-pc(p
scccc)
cccs
cmppssm
s.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 31/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
A c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s
Tpsvwu.K.a
accsivsbc
pxpc“m
qcs”p-
’svss
scmmsspcs
pcscmpvw-ssm.i,u.K.Cvav
awsmpcs,
ps.
“Wmmskswcc,s
smssmccs-
pcsf,”ps.“iccw
Cgcvvsscsqcs
svmpc
mss,,m
.”
Crew Reports Multiple
Bird Strikes While Trying to
Avoid Flock
Airbus A320. Minor damage. No injuries.
afmns,cw
wsccppcp
i.dppc,cp-
svfckssmw.
h-wm
c100.
d-,scwfw-
p150sw
pfck,ssv
mpcs.
apws,mssv-
ssww.
aspcpsv
sws.2,
wspc-fp,
ss.
Tcpsskc-
cw-sccvswp-
ssp.
“isp-sccvs…p-
vv cqs mp,
s-skpv smpss
cvpcs,”
ps.
Faulty Transistor Blamed or
Smoke on Flight Deck
Embraer EMB 145EP. Minor damage.No injuries.
dfmei,s
pwswF
lv(Fl)100(ppxm10,000)v
Fc,fcwwskp
p.
l,wcsFl270,cw-
cs,sw,
smkwsscp’ss.a
smm,cp’spmsp,
mcsp,mm
ccw-
ssm.tpspmmccssmkck,
xmskssmks,c
mcskcc
pFc.
a,cwcvxscs
ms()p
wwcwm;ss,ps-
sssmkvms
cw.(Csp
ccws p
csppm,smkwsqc.)
Mcpssc
smks.1iC-600vcs
cmp,wccsfcks-
ps.assqxmqpm
mcss
,wcsv
cmps.
TvsvsQuick
Reference Handbook (Qrh)mpc-scvmv
cmp’s.assvs-
,u.K.aaccsivsbc
cmmem“ps
pc[Qrh]…wc
ssmfsmsc
iC-600vcs
cmp.”emscmpws
ccvs.
A I R
T A X I / C o M M U T E R
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 32/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200628
A c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s
Bolt Installation Cited in
Landing Gear’s Failure to
Extend
Piper PA-34-200T Seneca II. Minor damage. No injuries.
nmscfnw
Z,psc
“doWn,”“landinggearunSaFe”w-
xs.Tpsv
sx.
hscppcsm-
cxspcs,
ssx.o
pcs, c w ck
pc--,s
xs.
hp,w-
c,ssw.
avss
xcscsp-
cm“jmmss[]
ssm,”cc
ps.
Tpss-
ccmcwks
c.Ccsw“v-scmpm
psscksc.”
Double Engine Failure Leads
to Landing in Mud Flats
Piper PA-31-350 Chietain.Substantial damage. No injuries.
tpwsfw-p
vsf scfas
wpsw40cms(74kms)p.asp
sscf,
pcvccmcc
ccvsppc.
aspps
1,000,cmc,c
s.h-
pmfswsp.
Tpss
smm,ws,
ms.hsmxcs
w-csspmps
mssc;-
spwvcs,s.
ac,236s(62u.S.-
s)wcvmks.
Tkscpc728s(192u.S.
s),c38s(10u.S.s)
s.aspcssm
cm-sccsw
pcc,sw
cmk-vssmws
cm.npmsw-
sssmsm
vcs.
Tkswsmv
300s(79u.S.s)f,
msccmpf.
Tccpsp,w
sfwcmp’semeMb110P1
bps,pcsc
b’scvs“lo
idle”p-ccks.
“Tcscsws
smC’s-mx
cs,”ps.“MvC’s
mxcspscssw‘lo
idle’bwspfw
sss
cmpsspw.…
“Tcws[]1,000w
pcsspw,s
wsscmpsp--
ccks.…Tvsws
csmvc
smss.”
Photos Enable In-fight Analysis
O Landing Gear Problem
Gulstream Aerospace Gulstream V.No damage. No injuries.
Skmpu
Ss,sfcwmpc
C o
R P o R A T E / B U S I N E S S
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 33/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006
A c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s
,m-
c.Tcwcc
cckscs,wcccc-
,mcm
jmmpxps.
dwpssvw-pp,mcps
ppp’sc-
.gsmaspcsvw
ppscwwcs
kx.Tcw
psxsk.
Tvswsc.
Tire Fails on Touchdown
Raytheon Beech 390 Premier I.Substantial damage. No injuries.
ismmccspvpuSs.
Wpcw,m
,pv.
Tpsfwp
w,kxpc“
f”pcw
.
Fire Fighting Airplane
Strikes Ground During
Familiarization Flight
Air Tractor AT-602. Destroyed.One atality.
ts-spwsfwv
wasspp’s
mzwc,wcws
sw-ppps.
apmpswsssswwmsp
,w-p,
ws“wsw…wcs
wwmc.”a
wpcmp,p’s
spcpp
spcwp
sc.Wssswsv
pmsssws
pwcs
sw.
Tpsp—wpvs
fwcps
pw-ppps—
cmp sss cx,ks
s,p,c-
smspswpsss
w.Tp’scp,wws
vs,ss,s
mzfs,ppcckp
p,wcpw-p
wsw.
Tcpsppws
csvsw—
smm msss.
Maintenance Personnel
Extinguish Landing Gear Fire
Cirrus Design SR22. Substantial damage.No injuries.
tpwsccxx
pmpuSs
wcpcc
wmp’sm-
ws.
Tpwpsssxp.
T-xswssc
xsfms.twmc
ccsmsc
-cpcxss
xsfms.
apmccpsvw
ccsswsvsmvs
ccCsSr20Sr22ps.
Landing Gear Breaks Ater
Touchdown on Grass Airstrip
Extra EA 300. Minor damage. No injuries.
tpwsm
f, p
ssspe
psm.
o T H E R
G E N E R A L A V I A T I o N
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 34/36
FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200630
A c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s
Tpspcw
wmws
cwwsm.
Tmk
ss,cspw
ssp.
awcssscw
mccwvm290
ssvks11ks.Tps
scwwsm340ssxks.
Mcpssp’s
mcscqvs
spc
s.
Tccps,ws,“wspssp-xswk-
ssm.”
Helicopter Strikes Branch
During Anti-poaching Flight
Bell 206L-3 LongRanger. Minor damage.No injuries.
t
cpwsfw-
pc p pk
tzwpcswsv.Tp
ccscsw
wcmpscsmk.h
cckfs,
wwcmpsw
cp.
Tps,ss
cps,sc
vm.acm,
“s”cp
w.hmvcp-
smc.
Wheel Breaks Through
Helipad Deck
Agusta A109C. Substantial damage.Two minor injuries.
acpp
asw pss
smkwscp,
pppccvpccpp-
.hcp“c”
,ccps.
Tpppcccpcc
mccvpccps,cpsckw
pvk.Txm
ccscp’s
mwkp
ck.
Tpscsccw
“mmmcp
cmpssspcscss
sc-cp
p…wskw,”“c-
cppwsssqssasa109C
cp”“pcck-
fwpwscp
sccpsmpsas
a109Ccp.”
Kneeboard Position Cited in
Landing Accident
Robinson R22 Beta. Substantial damage.One minor injury.
tspwspp
cp-pf
niw,smpmv
cccc,cc
kscmsp
sk.Tscc
pvpmcc,
mpc,p
s-c
p.Tcpw,sk
sck,cp
ss.
Tccpsf,
pswsq
ccwcccck-
s
sf,xpccsc.
Tpmcmpp
scf,w—w
pvwm—p
cpvx.■
R o T o R C R A F T
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 35/36
Now you havethe saety tools
to make a dierence.
The Flight Saety Foundation is a comprehensive and practical resource on
compact disc to help you prevent the leading causes o atalities in commercial aviation:
approach-and-landing accidents (ALAs), including those involving controlled fight into terrain (CFIT).
Put the FSF to work or you TODAY!• SeparateliesavingactsromctionamongthedatathatconrmALAsandCFITaretheleadingkillersinaviation.UseFSFdata-drivenstudiestoreveal
eye-openingactsthatarethenutsandboltsotheFSF ALAR Tool Kit .
• VolunteerspecialistsonFSFtaskorcesromtheinternationalaviationindustrystudiedtheactsanddevelopeddata-basedconclusionsandrecommendationstohelppilots,airtraccontrollersandotherspreventALAsandCFIT.Youcanapplytheresultsothiswork—NOW!
• Reviewanindustrywideconsensusobestpracticesincludedin34FSFALAR Briefng Notes .Theyprovidepracticalinormationthateverypilotshouldknow…but the FSF data confrm that many pilots didn’t know — or ignored — this inormation .Usethesebenchmarkstobuildnewstandardoperatingproceduresandtoimprovecurrentones.
• Relatedreadingprovidesalibraryomorethan2,600pagesoactualinormation:sometimeschilling,butalwaysuseul.AversatilesearchenginewillhelpyouexplorethesepagesandtheothercomponentsotheFSF ALAR Tool Kit .(ThiscollectionoFSFpublicationswouldcostmorethanUS$3,300ipurchasedindividually!)
• PrintinsixdierentlanguagesthewidelyacclaimedFSFCFIT Checklist ,whichhasbeenadaptedbyusersoreverythingromcheckingroutestoevaluatingairports.ThisproventoolwillenhanceCFITawarenessinanyfightdepartment.
• Fiveready-to-useslidepresentations—withspeakers’notes—canhelpspreadthesaetymessagetoagroup,andenhancesel-development. TheycoverATCcommunication,fightoperations,CFITprevention,ALAdataandATC/aircratequipment.Customizethemwithyourownnotes.
• An approach and landing accident: It could happen to you! This19-minutevideocanhelpenhancesaetyoreverypilot—romstudenttoproessional—intheapproach-and-landingenvironment.
• CFIT Awareness and Prevention :This33-minutevideoincludesasoberingdescriptionoALAs/CFIT.Andlisteningtothecrews’wordsandwatchingtheaccidentsunoldwithgraphicdepictionswillimprintanunorgettablelessonoreverypilotandeveryairtraccontrollerwhoseesthisvideo.
• Manymoretools—includingposters,theFSFApproach-and-landing Risk Awareness Tool andtheFSFApproach-and-landing Risk Reduction Guide —areamongthemorethan590megabytesoinormationintheFSFALAR Tool Kit .Aneasy-to-navigatemenuandbookmarksmaketheFSFALAR Tool Kit user-riendly.Applicationstoviewtheslidepresentations,videosandpublicationsareincludedontheCD,whichisdesignedtooperatewithMicrosotWindowsorAppleMacintoshoperatingsystems.
Tool Kit
Flight Safety Foundation
Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction
Order the FSF :
Memberprice:US$40Nonmemberprice:$160Quantitydiscountsavailable!
Contact:AhlamWahdan,membershipservicescoordinator,+1(703)739-6700,ext.102.
Recommended System Requirements:
Windows®
• APentium®-basedPCorcompatiblecomputer• Atleast128MBoRAM• Windows98/ME/2000/XPsystemsotware
Mac® OS
• A400MHzPowerPCG3orasterMacintoshcomputer• Atleast128MBoRAM• MacOS8.6/9,MacOSXv10.2.6–v10.3x
MacOSandMacintosharetrademarksoAppleComputerInc.registeredintheUnitedStatesandothercountries.MicrosotandWindowsareeitherregisteredtrademarksortrademarksoMicrosotCorp.intheUnitedStatesand/orothercountries.
TheFSFALAR Tool Kit isnotendorsedorsponsoredbyAppleComputerInc.orMicrosotCorp.
7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 36/36
For seminar inormation, contact Namratha Apparao,
tel: +1(703) 739-6700, ext. 101; e-mail: [email protected].
To sponsor an event, or to exhibit at the seminar, contact Ann
Hill, tel: +1(703) 739-6700, ext. 105; e-mail: [email protected].
present the
51st annual corporate aviation safety seminar CASS
aviation safety supporting the
corporate mission
may 9–11, 2006
phoenix, arizona
Want more inormation about Flight Saety Foundation?
Contact Ann Hill, director, membership and developmentby e-mail: <[email protected]> or by telephone: +1 (703) 739-6700, ext. 105.
Visit our Internet site at <www.fightsaety.org>.
We Encourage Reprints
Articles in this publication, in the interest o aviation saety, may be reprinted in whole or in part, but may not be oered or sale directly or indirectly,used commercially or distributed electronically on the Internet or on any other electronic media without the express written permission o Flight Saety Foundation. All uses must credit Flight Saety Foundation, Flight Safety Digest , the specifc article(s) and the author(s). Please send two copies o thereprinted material to the Publications Department. Tese restrictions apply to all Flight Saety Foundation publications. Reprints must be ordered romthe Foundation.
What’s Your Input?
In keeping with the Foundation’s independent and nonpartisan mission to disseminate objective safety information, FSF publications solicit credible contributionsthat oster thought-provoking discussion o aviation saety issues. I you have an article proposal, a completed manuscript or a technical paper that may beappropriate or Flight Safety Digest , please contact the director o publications. Reasonable care will be taken in handling a manuscript, but Flight Saety Foundation assumes no responsibility or material submitted. Te publications sta reserves the right to edit all published submissions. Te Foundationbuys all rights to manuscripts and payment is made to authors upon publication. Contact the Publications Department or more inormation.
Flight Saety Digest
Copyright © 2006 by Flight Saety Foundation Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN 1057-5588
Suggestions and opinions expressed in FSF publications belong to the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by Flight Safety Foundation. Tis information is not intended to supersede operators’/manufacturers’ policies,
practices or requirements, or to supersede government regulations.
Sta: Mark Lacagnina, senior editor; Wayne Rosenkrans, senior editor; Linda Werelman, senior editor;Rick Darby, associate editor; Karen K. Ehrlich, web and print production coordinator; Ann L. Mullikin, production designer;
Susan D. Reed, production specialist; and Patricia Setze, librarian, Jerry Lederer Aviation Saety Library
Subscriptions: One year subscription or 12 issues includes postage and handling: US$280 or members/US$520 or nonmembers. Include old and new dd h dd h hl hd b h d l h d