High Stakes in Language Proficiency

36
High Stakes in Laguage Pociecy Flight Safety D I G E S T  JANUARY– FE BRUARY 20 06

Transcript of High Stakes in Language Proficiency

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 1/36

High Stakes in Laguage Pociecy

Flight Safety D I G E S T

 JANUARY– FEBRUARY 2006

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 2/36

High Stakes in Language Profciency 

I a eot to euce acciets ivolvig commuicatio

eciecies, ICAO is equiig pilots, cotolles a

aeoautical statio opeatos ivolve i iteatioal

opeatios to be teste o thei ability to speak a

uesta Eglish. At stake ae caees, iusty

ivestmet i taiig a testig — a saety.

Global Passenger-mortality Risk

Decreased Substantially in AccidentsFrom 2000 to 2005

 The isk o yig i a acciet aboa a aomly chose

fight was lowe tha eve i the peio 2000–2005, i evey

iusty segmet examie. Whe passege atalities uig

the teoist attacks o Sept. 11, 2001, wee iclue, howeve,

passege-motality isk i ot ecease o U.S. scheule

omestic passege jet fights compae with the peio 1990–1999.

Increased Automation Will Bring NewHuman Factors Challenges to ATM

 Ai tac maagemet (ATM) huma actos specialists ae

wokig to aticipate, a thus avoi, poblems associate

with geate automatio.

Cleaning Solvent Blamed or B-777Landing Gear Fire

Ivestigatos ou that the subsequet evacuatio exceee

ceticatio time limits a that passeges wee ot le to a

secue aea.

Flight Safety FoundationFo Eveyoe Cocee With the Saety o Flight

 www.fightsaety.org

OFFICErS And STAFF

  Chairman, Board o Governors Amb. Ewa W. Stimpso

  President and CEO Stuat Matthews

  Executive Vice President robet H. Vael

 General Counsel and Secretary  Keeth P. Qui, Esq.

Treasurer davi J. Bage

 AdMInISTrATIVE

  Manager, Support Services Lia Cowley Hoge

FInAnCIAL

Chie Financial Ofcer Pey L. Youg

Accountant Millicet Wheele

MEMBErSHIP

  Director, Membership

and Development A Hill

Membership Services

Coordinator Ahlam Waha

  Membership Services

Coordinator namatha Appaao

PUBLICATIOnS

  Senior Editor Mak Lacagia

  Senior Editor Waye rosekas

  Senior Editor Lia Weelma

   Associate Editor rick daby

  Web and Print

Production Coordinator Kae K. Ehlich

  Production Designer A L. Mulliki

  Production Specialist Susa d. ree  Librarian, Jerry Lederer

 Aviation Saety Library  Paticia Setze

 TECHnICAL

 Director o Technical Programs James M. Bui

  Managing Director o

 Air Transport Saety Services Louis A. Soetio III

Q-Star Program Administrator robet Feele

  Manager, Data Systems

and Analysis robet do, Ph.d.

  Manager o Aviation

Saety Audits daol V. Holsma

  Founder Jeome Leee1902–2004

Flight Safety Digest Vol. 25 no. 1–2 Jauay–Febuay 2006

I This Issue

Flight Saety Foundation is an international membership organizationdedicated to the continuous improvement o aviation saety. Nonprotand independent, the Foundation was launched ocially in 1947 inresponse to the aviation industry’s need or a neutral clearinghouse todisseminate objective saety inormation, and or a credible and knowl-edgeable body that would identiy threats to saety, analyze the problemsand recommend practical solutions to them. Since its beginning, theFoundation has acted in the public interest to produce positive infuenceon aviation saety. Today, the Foundation provides leadership to morethan 900 member organizations in more than 150 countries.

20

   L   I   B   R  A    R   Y

STATS

14

     B     R     I     E     F      S

25

Cove photo: © Copyight 2006 Photodisc Ic.

1

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 3/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

Message From the President

Looking Ahead: A New Format or FSF Publications

i m ps c F S F (FSF) pcs w ms p F’s s. T m w c cvc, sss pp. i’s sm w xc , s w v w .

b, s w c k w .

T sv c FSF pcs (w m, v m) w pc s m pcc Aviation Saety World . W w c cv sm pcs w ws v, s w s w s, s pck.

 Aviation Saety World w pv cmp p, -c s. T w k w cpps cs; cmp, m v pp; ss, mz-p pp.

W v cmm svs s c cs mpc m s w svs w m. y b gvs cs F S F cz s cmpss sm c cms. T s w q mj , wc w pc pcs “ ” w s ss s w cc

w pc. T c   Aviation Saety World s sc J ss.

a i ms sk c ps, i m c w  Aviation Saety World  w w.

S MwsPs CeoF S F

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 4/36

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 5/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

Cc ccs vv-

q pcc

s cmps es

p-c cmmc

s pmp i Cv av

oz (iCao) ss s

pcc qms s.C qms s

cmp Mc 2008.

W w ss s cm s

es s p-

c cmmc.

“es s p c

cmm v,”

iCao s.1 “T w pvss mz

.”

es s v w s

60 cs s

sc m m cs, iCao

s. Pp w spk es s sc - s “ ” m s

w spk es s s .

nvss, s es -

p ( smss spc

) s w cvs.

“bcs s s cs ss  

c , pp  

High Stakes in Language Profciency 

In an eort to reduce accidents involving communication deiciencies, ICAO is requiring pilots,

controllers and aeronautical station operators involved in international operations to be tested

or their ability to speak and understand English. At stake are careers, industry investment in

training and testing — and saety.

— FSF Editorial StaFF

   ©   2   0   0   6   B   l     n   k   S   t  o  c   k

    n   d   i  m    g  e  s .  c  o  m ,

   i  n  c .

   a   l   l  r     g   h   t  s  r  e  s  e  r  v  e   d .

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 6/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

ssv sss

s pc,” s ez

Mws, spcs p-

p scs  

p —

Pcc rqms

Cmm es S gp(PriCeSg) — vp

es pcc 

ss iCao.2 “i

cs v,

s, cmm

s vs ckw-

. T cc es

v cmmcs s m

c s s.”

T m sm cs w

pcc qms. iCao c s s- v s mm ss “js”

sm ss x

s.

“T 2008 ws v q-

ms,” s P lm, c iCao’s F

S Sc.3 “o spcss v

s pv m ps

sm ps w, s m sm

wk. W ’ xpc mj c.”

T PriCeSg w cv ap 2006

s sv ss m w

mk cmms iCao.

Saety Implications

F S F (FSF) s m

zs v c v-

pm mmm pmc ss

es pcc. T F’s

cmms w s m

sc 1990s c -

(CFit) ppc-- ccs.

“T cm cccs cs

cws s s ps,”

FSF appc-- acc rc

(alar) tsk Fc s 1998.4 “i sv cc-

cs vv -v es spks,

sss xc p cmmc-

w cws atC [ c

c]. Sv cccs vv ms

cmmc - mc

cw, w atC qs cc/

 vc ms smss.

“T s mpcs m s m p-

c msss w cm.

Sm s pms  es- atC ppcs, wc vv

xcs f m cm-

mcs vs ws v

m es. T iCao czs

s, es s ms w s atC

cmmcs s c s. o

pms m s m ck q c

c es- sks s

s c m. bcs ssv

pc [spcs] c spcs s s-

, v cmm s

p ss cmm-s es- sk vs. uz

s m, ss

c, s c.”

High Priority 

i 1998, i m c iCao

assm k c s ps

cs “ pc cc

cmp p cmmcs

es .”

i s pps s, i spcc c

1995 CFit cc C, Cm,

1996 m cs d s v -

c “ck pcc cmps  

es cws c

cs” (s “ls ts,” p 3).

T iCao assm p, ss

p , s pps i. i

2000, PriCeSg ws ss  

ccs iCao ss cmm

pccs (SarPs) c vc cmmcs ps, vp m-

mm es- pcc qms

vp sz s qms

pcs.5

bs s p’s cmms, iCao

2003 p sv mms ax

1 (ps cs), ax 6 (

Continued on page 5

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 7/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

 a 

gun csn, fue-exhusn

ccen, cne fgh n

en (CFit) ccen n

m csn wee ce by he

inenn Cv avn ognzn

(iCao) s exmpes f f ce

ccens nvvng neque Engsh-

nguge pfcency.1

“Wh hese seemngy ffeen ypes f 

ccens h n cmmn ws h, n

ech ne, ccen nvesgs fun h

nsuffcen Engsh-nguge pfcency n

he p f he fgh cew cne

h pye cnbung e n he chn

f evens eng he ccen,” iCao

s. “in n hese hgh-pfe

ccens, mupe ncens n ne

msses s esu f nguge pbems

e epe nnuy, nsgng evew f 

cmmuncn pceues n sns

wwe.”

‘We Are Now at Takeoff’

 the gun csn ce by iCao nvve

w Beng 747s ls res ap n

 tenefe, Cny isns, Spn, n Mch

27, 1977.2

 Vsby ws euce subsny by fgwhen cne ssue epue nsuc-

ns he fgh cew f KlM 747 h

ws ne up f keff n he unwy. the

fs ffce, whse nve nguge ws

duch, e bck he cne’s nsuc-

ns n s, “We e nw keff.”

 the cne, whse nve nguge ws

Spnsh, n unesn h he fs

ffce’s nsmssn ws men cnvey

h he KlM cew wee cnucng ke-

ff. inse, he cne beeve h he

KlM cew wee mnnng he pne’s

psn n he unwy n wng keff 

cence.

 the cn e cknwege he fs

ffce’s nsmssn by syng, “oK. Sn

by f keff. i w c yu.”

 a he sme me, he fgh cew f Pn

 amecn 747 e, “We e s x-

ng wn he unwy.” the smuneus

nsmssns by he cne n he

Pn am cew esue n whsng sun

n he fequency h se hee

secns.

 the cne he Pn am cew

ep ce f he unwy, n he Pn am

cew cknwege he nsucn. Sn

heefe, he fgh engnee b he

KlM pne ske hs cegues f he

Pn am pne ws ce f he unwy.

 the KlM cpn epe, “oh, yes.”

 the KlM pne ws beng e f

keff when suck he Pn am pne.

 a f 583 pepe wee ke n he

csn.

in s fn ep, he Spnsh gvenmen

s h he funmen cuse f he c-

cen ws h he KlM cpn “k ff 

whu cence; n bey he ‘sn

by f keff’ [nsucn] fm he we;

n neup keff when Pn am

epe h hey wee s n he unwy;

[n,] n epy he fgh engnee’s quey

s whehe he Pn am [pne] h

ey ef he unwy, epe emphcy

n he ffmve.”

‘I Think We Need Priority’

 the fgh cew’s fue cey cnvey

cc w-fue sun ffc

cn (atC) pye e n he Jn. 25,

1990, fue-exhusn ccen nvvng n

 avnc anes Beng 707 Cve Neck,

New Yk, U.S.3

Becuse f vese wehe cnns n

he nhesen Une Ses, he cew

h been nsuce h hee mes, f

f bu ne hu n 17 mnues,

ung he scheue fgh fm Bgá,

Cmb, Jhn F. Kenney inenn

 ap (JFK), New Yk.

 the pne ws n he h hng p-

en bu 39 nuc mes (72 kmees)

suh f JFK when he cne exene

he me whch he cew cu expec

fuhe cence. the fs ffce s, “ah,

we, i hnk we nee py.”

 the cene cne s, “rge. Hw

ng cn yu h n wh s yu e-

ne [p]?”

in sepe nsmssns, he fs

ffce s, “We’ be be h bu

fve mnues,” n h he ene p

“ws Bsn, bu we cn’ nw … we

un u f fue nw.”

 the cne ssue vec sequence

he 707 wh ffc n n exene ef

wnwn eg f runwy 22l. as he

pne nee he p, hweve, he

cne he cew cnuc 360-

egee un f spcng.

 the pne encunee wn she s

he cew cnuce he nsumen nng

sysem (ilS) ppch runwy 22l. the

unwy envnmen ws n n sgh when

he pne eche ecsn hegh, n

he cpn ce f msse ppch.

 afe epng he msse ppch, he

fs ffce he ppch cne,

“We’e unnng u f fue, s.”

 the cne s, “i’m gng bng yu

bu ffeen mes [28 kmees] nhes

n un yu bck n f he ppch. ish fne wh yu n yu fue?”

“i guess s. thnk yu vey much,” he

fs ffce s. a few mnues e, he

equese, n eceve, vec he

fn ppch cuse.

 ahugh he cpn h he fs

ffce seve mes ece n eme-

gency, he fs ffce h n ece

n emegency. the fs ffce beeve

h hs eques f py hnng h

been unes by atC s eques f

emegency hnng.

 a fu engnes f me u, n he -

pne suck en bu 16 nuc mes

(30 kmees) fm he p. of he 158

ccupns, 73 wee ke n 81 wee

seusy njue.

in s fn ep, he U.S. Nn

 tnspn Sfey B s h he

Lost in Translation

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 8/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

pbbe cuses f he ccen wee

“he fue f he fgh cew equey

mnge he pne’s fue n he

fue cmmunce n emegency fue

sun [atC] befe fue exhusn

ccue.”

‘Go Tulua?’

in he CFit ccen, Spnsh-spekng

cne’s nby pbe f nfmn

fm n Engsh-spekng fgh cew bu

seemngy gc cence equess n

psn eps esue n he cne

n ezng h he fgh cew wee cn-

fuse bu he psn n fyng he

pne ne munnus en nh f 

C, Cmb, n dec. 20, 1995.4

 the cew f he amecn anes Beng757 wee nsnng fm cuse fgh

nnpecsn nsumen ppch

runwy 19 he C p. En ue fm

Mm, F, U.S., he pne ws beng

fwn n nn atC envnmen n

n nghme vsu meegc cn-

ns (VMC).

 the cne ssue he fwng ce-

nce: “Cee Vor dME [vey-hgh-

fequency mnecn /snce

mesung equpmen] ppch unwy

ne nne, rz numbe ne v. rep

 tuu Vor.”

 the tuu Vor ws bu 34 nuc mes

(63 kmees) nh f he p. the

rz nnecn becn (NdB) ws

2.6 nuc mes (4.8 kmees) nh

f he p. the cew scusse whch

nvgn hey shu fy nex. the

cpn (he p n fyng) hen ske he

cne f cence nvge ecy

he rz NdB “n hen he rz

v.”

 the cne epe, “affmve. tke he

rz ne n unwy ne nne. the wn

s cm.” the cne hen he cew

ep tuu n he 21-nuc-me

(39-kmee) dME fx suh f tuu.

 as he cpn cknwege he nsuc-

ns, he pne psse ve he tuu

 Vor n hen une ef n esey

heng. the cew n eze h he

pne h psse ve he Vor becuse

he wypns enee n he fgh mnge-

men sysem (FMS) h been ese when

hey h empe ene he enfe

f he rz NdB. in n, nse f 

eneng he enfe f he rz NdB,

he cew h enee he enfe f he

rme NdB, whch ws bu 132 nu-c mes (244 kmees) es.

 the pne emne n he esey

heng, w he rme NdB, bu

ne mnue. the cpn hen he fs

ffce un gh n pcee he C

 Vor, whch ws bu 10 nuc mes

(19 kmees) suh f he p.

 the cpn he cne h he -

pne ws 38 nuc mes (70 kmees)

fm he C Vor n ske, “Yu wn

us g tuu n hen he rz …

unwy ne nne?”

 the cne nvesgs h he

cew’s quey bu fyng ecy he

 tuu Vor me n sense becuse he

epe psn 38 nuc mes fm he

C Vor nce h he pne ws

suh f he tuu Vor.

“He s h hs fuency n nn-vn

Engsh ws me n he cu n sk 

hem ebe n he eques,” s

he fn ep by he aenáuc Cv f 

he repubc f Cmb. “the cnefuhe se h, h he ps been

Spnsh-spekng, he wu hve

hem h he eques me e sense

n h ws gc n ncnguen.

He s h becuse f mns n hs

cmmn f Engsh, he ws unbe

cnvey hese hughs he cew.”

inse, he cne ese he ce-

nce n equese he 757’s psn

eve he C Vor s fws: “Yu

cn [unnegbe w] ne unwy ne

nne. Yu cn use unwy ne nne. Wh

s yu ue n he dME fm C?”

 the cpn s h he pne ws 37

nuc mes (69 kmees) fm he C

 Vor n 10,000 fee.

 the cew wee scussng he pgm-

mng f he FMS when he cne

gn ske f he pne’s ue.

 the cpn epe h he pne ws

9,000 fee. the cne ske f

psn ep, bu he cpn n

espn.

Fve secns fe he cne’s eques

f psn ep, he cew eceve

gun-pxmy wnng sysem (GPWS)en wnng. they ppe fu pwe

n se he pne’s nse, bu n

ec he spes. the pne suck

munn ge bu 8,900 fee. of he

163 ccupns, 159 wee ke n fu

wee seusy njue.

 aenáuc Cv s h he pbbe

cuses f he ccen wee:

• “the fgh cew’s fue equey

pn n execue he ppch

runwy 19 [ he C p] n

he neque use f umn;

• “Fue f he fgh cew scn-

nue he ppch n C, e-

spe numeus cues eng hem

f he nvsby f cnnung he

ppch;

• “the ck f sun weness

f he fgh cew egng vec

nvgn, pxmy en n he

eve cn f cc s;

[n,]

• “Fue f he fgh cew eve

bsc nvgn he me

when he FMS-ssse nvgn

becme cnfusng n emne n

excessve wk n cc phse

f fgh.”

‘Flight Level 140’

 a fgh cew’s msunesnng f n -

ue cence pye e n he m

csn f Su abn anes Beng

747 n Kzkh awys iyushn il-76t 

h ccue ne deh, in, n Nv. 12,

1996. Nghme VMC peve, bu bh

pnes wee beng fwn n cus when

he csn ccue. a ep by acms

s h nehe pne ws equppe wh

csn-vnce sysem.5

 the 747 fgh cew wee cnucng

sn nsumen epue pceue

fe keff fm deh. the cew atC

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 9/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

h hey wee ne he ssgne ue,

Fgh leve (Fl) 140 (ppxmey 14,000

fee), n equese cence cnnue

he cmb. the cne he cew

mnn Fl 140.

 the il-76t cew wee cnucng e-scen n ecpc heng n

deh. the cne he cew mn-

n Fl 150 n vse h n ubun

pne ws Fl 140. the pe

b he il-76t ske he cne f

he he pne’s psn. the cne

s, “tffc s egh mes nw, fgh eve

ne fu ze.”

 the cpn, fs ffce, fgh engnee

n nvg b he il-76t ep-

ey msunes he cne’s n-

sucns men h hey h been

cee escen Fl 140. the

pe bseve h he pne ws

escenng bew Fl 150 n shue

hs cegues, “Keep ne fve ze.

dn’ escen.” the ps wee nng

cmb when he csn ccue. the

37 ccupns f he il-76t n he 312

ccupns f he 747 wee ke.

“the fue f ms f he il-76 cew

cecy unesn he sun ws -

bue he ck f wkng knwege

f Engsh,” he acms ep s. ■

— FSF E Sff 

Notes

1. inenn Cv avn ognzn

(iCao). dcumen 9835. Manual on

the Implementation of ICAO Language

Proficiency Requirements. 2004.

2. Gvenmen f Spn. Aircraft 

Collision: Boeing 747, PH-BUF, of 

KLM and Boeing 747, N737PA, of Pan

 Am at Los Rodeos (Tenerife) on March

 27, 1977 . Engsh vesn, Juy 12,

1978.

3. U.S. Nn tnspn Sfey

B. Aircraft Accident Report:

 Avianca, The Airline of Colombia;

Boeing 707-321B, HK 2016; Fuel 

Exhaustion; Cove Neck, New York;

 January 25, 1990. NtSB/aar-91/04.

4. aenáuc Cv f he repubc

f Cmb. Controlled Flight Into

Terrain; American Airlines Flight 965;

Boeing 757-223, N651AA; Near Cali,

Colombia; December 20, 1995.

5. acms. World Aircraft Accident 

Summary . issue 139: a96:37.

ps), ax 10 (c -

cmmcs) ax 11 ( c

svcs).

i 2004, iCao ps dcm 9835,

 Manual on the Implementation o ICAO

Language Proiciency Requirements,

pv c “ ms

cv v mss,

s zs.”

SarPs s

cmmcs sw

appx a (p 11). iCao’s lm 

mpc s

m ss c

c. F xmp, ax 1 (p-

ps 1.2.9.1 1.2.9.2) qs p-

s, cs c s

ps “ms

spk s s

p cmmcs.”

am pcp cs m

2003 ws p m c

m pcc. a

w pp (1.2.9.4) qs ps,

cs c s p-

s Mc 5, 2008, ms

m spcc c c-

pcc

sc (t a-1, p 13).

t pcc sc

cs sx vs: P-m (lv

1); em (lv 2); Pp

(lv 3); op (lv 4); ex

(lv 5); exp (lv 6). ec v

cs c pc, sc-

, vc, c, cmps

cs.

Minimum Profciency 

Ps, cs c

s ps w cc -

ps w q

ms s lv 4 pcc,

wc s ccz

pcc sc s ws:

• Pc — “Pc,

sss, m

c s

v q - w s s.”

• Sc — “bsc mmc

scs sc ps

s cv s w-

c. es m cc, p-

c s xpc

ccmscs,

w m.”

• Vc — “Vc

ccc s sc

cmmc cv cmm,

cc wk- pcs.

C pps sccss 

w ck vc s

xpc ccmscs.”

• Fc — “Pcs scs  

ppp mp.t m ccs ss -

c s m s

mc spc sps

c, s s pv

cv cmmc. C mk

m s scs mks

ccs. Fs sc.”

• Cmps — “Cmps

s ms cc cmm, c-

c wk- pcs w

cc v s s s-

c - cmm ss. W

spk s c w

sc s cmpc

xpc vs,

cmps m sw

q cc ss.”

• ics — “rspss s-

mm, ppp

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 10/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

mv. is m-

s xcs v w -

w xpc  

vs. ds q w

pp msss

cck, cm

c.”

Speech Samples

lm p

pcc

sc ws vp ss

PriCeSg s -

ss w w cc es

s. h s c m

c s pp w

ck scs.

t p c svc ms,

ps, cs, c s p-

s s s c, iCao s

vp cmpc sc (Cd) w

c spc smps csp lv 3,

lv 4 lv 5 pcc. lm s

Cd s v pcs m iCao

Mc 2006.

“Pp w cs,”

s. “t w , w xp-

s w s spcv

vs, k cc c c,

sc, pc s . T spc

smps xps w sw v 

w w m w w s lv 4.”

Overall Ability 

t ppx ax 1 cs “sc

scps” psc qms

v s spk

. acc sc scps,

ps, cs c s p-

s ms ms :

• “Cmmc cv vc- 

(p/p) c--

c ss.” (dcm 9835 ss

 vc- cmmc s m c

c--c cmmc cs

spk c s c xpsss,

ss p v

mss.)

• “Cmmc cmm, cc

wk- pcs w ccc c.”

• “us ppp cmmcv ss

xc msss cz

sv msss (.., cck,

cm c m) wk- cx.” (o xmp  

cmmcv s s ps

pps mss w spk -

ms cp s

mss. “Smms, ps 

‘s ’ s s s -

qs cc p,”

dcm 9835 ss.)

• “h sccss w v s

sc cs ps cm-

pc xpc vs ccs w cx wk 

s cmmcv sk w wc

ws m.” (i ws,

ps, cs c s

ps ms v sc

pcc pv cmmc

kw w sm xpc

ccs.)

• “us c cc wc s

c cmm.” (a

scs vs ms s

xpc jm m

w css s c

cc m ,

dcm 9835 ps pp v

cp m spc p-

s s mk msvs

s.)

lv 6 pcc s w SarPs.

Pp 1.2.9.6 ax 1 qs ps,

cs c s ps

w ms lv 4 pcc lv 5

pcc s mslv 6 pcc.

rs scs w ss

v ss. iCao s cmm

s w ms lv 4 pcc

s v s s w

ms lv 5 pcc s v 

sx s. rs s cmm f lv

6 pcc s ms.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 11/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

Standard Phraseology 

b 2003, s “s ps-

” ws q SarPs. ax

10 (pp 5.1.1.1) w qs s  

“iCao ps p w s-

z ps c sv smss.”

iCao ps s ps ax 10,

Vm ii, Cp 12 PanSatM

(Procedures or Air Navigation Services–Air rac

 Management ). iCao ps s sm

scs m s pss ps

mm ss v cs w

iCao. F xmp, s iCao ps,

c w c cw “ p

w” w k cc; s-

u.S. F av ams (Faa)ps, c w c cw 

x “ps ” w.

b d, iCao cc c mm

PriCeSg, s csscs

s pss s v ss

c cs cs m s.6

“Cv v mss m  

ss v cmp cws

s m cs

s, s s cs cs cs,” d s.

dcm 9835 ss vs s iCao

s ps m q “-

” ps cs w v cm

ccsm pss.

“Ts cs ps s c

smp cs s q -v

es-spk cps cq es-

pcc iCao op

lv 4 s v c-

m iCao pss xcsv,”

cm ss.

Plain Language

a sz ps s -

q cmmc

sm ss mc 

ss, c pp ss.

“l pcc m mmz

pss s q, xss

s w 

ss iCao pss,” iCao s.7

Mws s s

spk “p es” c s qck - mc ss.

“Sc ccmscs m q c-

p c scp s-

z pss,” s s.8 “i ,

p c q cs

c cmmcs, xp

m. a sc -

sc ms m s

v ws pcc s

m spcc m sz

pss.”

exmps p p’s p

“ s w,” c’s

sc “p pss w

.”

 Which Language?

ax 10 (pp 5.2.1.2.1) ws m

require, cmm,

cmmc “ cc

m s s .”a c ws or in the English

language.

“a vs s -

w es-s--sc-

s, pcc q-

ms pp

s -

c p cmmc-

s,” ss dcm 9835.

as s mm, cs

c s ps

pv svcs

ms cmmc es

w qs s

cw.

“as xmp, Sps s sp-

k s

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 12/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

ss m Mxc C amc

mc S amc,” dcm

9835 ss. “F s sc ss,

Sps es c s, es ms

m v. i ps

s spc m s es Sps.”

Onus on Operators

Pps ax 6 ax 11

2003 q cmmc cf

ps s ps m w 

pcc ss -

c svc pvs s cs

m ss.

W s qms cms sps 

cf ps c svc pv-

s vp s pcs.

ez Mws s s s 2008

s s ssv qs s-

s cc , s

ws mps p iCao s w

cs, wc q w cs s-

s cm ppc v s f

p.

“bcs , iCao s ss s-

s v sc vp

es- pcc,” s s.9 “tss

vp, s cc

 vc pc m w ss

w s.”

exs es- p-

cc ss, sc s toeFl

(ts es s F

l), s -

cs s

cmps (.., s,

spk) s

c iCao -

pcc sc.

Mws s z-

cmps — c

w cmp, av es

Svcs (aeS) — c

vp pms

s pms p

s m iCao

qms.

bz, xmp, s vp pms

w v s 450 cs

ww s i s s

mms i a tsp

assc.

a pss m, wv, s pmc xs — ec’s p vs  

Pcc es l a tc

Cs (Pela) s, wc ws -

 vp 1994 s s cs.

a e, pjc ec

is a nv Svcs mm

PriCeSg, s Pela s cmps

w iCao’s lv 4 c.10

T Pela s, wc s ms es-

scs atC scs wv cmp - cs, s

ps:

• t s p vs c’s s-

q c w

spcc m v m c

p-c cmmcs;

• t sc p vs c’s

sp c msss

qss m ps;

• t p vs c’s  

c s c-

p p c

s s atC

spvs; ,

• t p, wc s q sm

ec ss, vs c’s

pc atC cms w

es.

Profciency Takes Time

W dcm 9835 ss 100 s

200 s sc w q

c  measurable mpvm

pcc, Mws sms , p

-v spk’s s v es

pcc, 200 s 800 s sc-

pc w q m lv

4 qms.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 13/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

Mws s w es- p-

cc qms “mk k 

cs” ps cs vv

ps.

b c csqcs, “ cmc

pcsss s c svcpvs c sv ps cs

cs p  

cs cmpc w iCao -

pcc qms,” ss dcm

9835.

Mws s s c

s wk.

“t s c w

s’ cmc

ps’ cs; ’ s, s ss w ,” s s. “t

ws s ms v, -

ss , s cp w 

.”

Mws s cv pm

w c cmp-s s spp-

m cssm ccmm

scs ps cs. a

sjc-m spcss w s -

 jc, ms cc pm 

q es cs.

“Ms pp v c es s

s — w c spk es c

c es,” s s. “T s mspcp.

l c s  proession.”

iCao ss pmm sc w v

-v qcs c-

, pcc xpc c v

es s sc xpc s

p c. Mmm qcs

cc c es s sc

, xpc c “ wk w w sjc-m

xp.”

iCao cmms q es sc-

s w v xpc p w

v sjc-m spcss.

“W s not  cv s

cc xps pv pm

vm -

cc,” dcm 9835

ss. “W vs w

xpc c

c ck mk v-

( css) sjc-

m xps c c, sk  

teaching  csss -

 vp ppp

ms s -

c x-

ps m vps.”

iCao s scs v v

es spks.

“n-v scs c, xmp,

s- xpc sc- c,” ss

dcm 9835.

a cmm c s w j-spcc cmps

ps, cs c s

ps s k, Mws s, s-

w v vw

(c--c v p) qss

ps cmp pm.

“i s p--pp s,” s s. “ts

ms vv m s -

m, w v c.”

iCao cmms ss cm s-

s vp i l

ts assc (ilta), cmmc,

p z.

“ts ss vps c ilta

c cs s c s s

vpm s pccs m

ss,” ss dcm 9835, wc cs

ilta c cs.

‘Natives’ Not Exempt

aall ps, cs c

s ps w cc

ps ms m pcc 

qms, iCao s s -

v wm es s s v

k c css vw  

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 14/36

0 Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

psv s’s cs -

, m v

s v spc mpm

“ppp s” cc

cs cmmc.

iCao cmms s w lv6 pcc mk mpv

c s

smsss s s

ps, m  

spc v s “-

,” sc s ms

cqsms.

a m s xpss  

spc c

ws cs. F xmp, p

m s, “W’ ss c,” ckw c’s sc

c sp, “W’

” p mss ppc (iCao

s ps p

mss ppc s “ ”).

Cqsms m xpsss

sc s “” “ ” “’”

“s’.”

No Cure-all

a cs s smss ( k) ss-

ms sws pms sc 

c c cmmc,

cmmc k w

v m.

“W k ssms w, ,

mpv v cmmcs

sm vs, pss mpv cc 

s, s c sc

ssms w v qm

cmmc sks,”Mws s.11 “t w c

cmmc

mc ss

s ckp ssm .”

as s cmm-

c xss, cmmc w

c ps sk v

s.

“Cmmc s w p 

v cmp m; wv,cmpc w iCao

pcc qms w

spks m cz s

wk w sccss s

s msss,” ss

dcm 9835.■

Notes

1. i Cv av oz

(iCao). dcm 9835. Manual on

the Implementation o ICAO Language

Prociency Requirements. 2004.

2. Mws, ez. “Pvss

Pcc Cmm av

l b S.” ICAO

 Journal Vm 56 (ap 2001).

3. lm, P. tp vw  

lc, Mk. ax, V,

u.S. F. 16, 2006. F S 

F, ax, V, u.S.

4. F S F (FSF)

appc-- acc

rc (alar) tsk Fc. “Ks

av: FSF tsk Fc PssFcs a appc--

C---

accs.” Flight Saety Digest Vm 17

(nvmdcm 1998) Vm

18 (JF 1999).

5. iCao. dcm 9835.

6. d, b. “h awss  

Cmmc Ps C b

S.” ICAO Journal Vm 59

(JF 2004).

7. iCao. Background Inormation to

Proposed Amendments Concerning Language Prociency or Radiotelephony 

Communications. acm F S

l an 13/48.2-02/1.

8. Mws. ICAO Journal .

9. Mws. ivw lc, Mk.

ax, V, u.S. dc. 10, 2005.

F S F, ax,

V, u.S.

10. e, a. “up ts Sss

nw rqm dms es

l Pcc.”ICAO Journal 

 

Vm 59 (JF 2004).

11. Mws. ICAO Journal .

Further Reading From

FSF Publications

nv, Mc; Wk, Mc b. “ass

Cw Cvss Pvs iss

acc ivs.” Flight Saety Digest  

Vm 24 (oc 2005).

FSF e S. “Cw ls b-777

rw Sc Cs tk.” Airport 

Operations Vm 31 (Spmoc

2005).

FSF e S. “ep a tc

Cs ass ic Pv

rw icss.” Airport Operations 

Vm 30 (Mcap 2004).

FSF e S. “Mm lpss,

Mscmmc, iq C

C s Ms Cmm Css tw

Cs’ es.” Airport Operations 

Vm 27 (Spmoc 2001).

FSF e S. “us S

Ps F Cws a tc

Cs Cs acf emcs.”

 Airport Operations Vm 26 (Mcap

2000).

up, S. “es-

t a tc Cs Ms

g b bsc atC Vc.” Airport 

Operations Vm 23 (Spmoc

1997).

K, r l. “excss Ws, P

rcks Sc h ass PatC

Cmmc es.” Airport Operations 

Vm 23 (JF 1997).

Cs, Sv. “Pa tc C

Cmmcs: i’s n (o) W y

S, i’s hw y S i.” Flight Saety Digest 

Vm 14 (J 1995).

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 15/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

 Appendix A 

International Standards and

Recommended Practices

Relating to Language Use in

Radio Communications

 Annex 1 to the Convention on

International Civil Aviation:

Personnel Licensing; Chapter 1,

Defnitions and General Rules

Concerning Licences

1.2.9.1 [ap] cp ps s

vs w q s -

p cf s ms

spk s s

p cmmcs.

Note — Pursuant to Article 42 o the Convention

on International Civil Aviation, paragraph

1.2.9.1 does not apply to personnel whose [li-

censes] are originally issued prior to 5 March

2004 but, in any case, does apply to personnel 

whose [licenses] remain valid aer 5 March

2008.

1.2.9.2 a c cs c

s ps s ms  

spk s s p cmmcs.

1.2.9.3 rcmm — F s,

ps s v

spk s s

p cmmcs.

1.2.9.4 as 5 Mc 2008, [p]

cp ps, c cs -

c s ps s ms

spk s s

p cmmcs vspc pcc qms

[appx 1].

1.2.9.5 rcmm — [ap] -

cp ps, vs q s

p c, -

c cs c s ps

s ms spk -

s s p 

cmmcs v spc

pcc qms [appx 1].

1.2.9.6 as 5 Mc 2008, p-

cc [p] cp ps, c

cs c s ps w

ms pcc w exp lv(lv 6) s m v vs

ccc w v’s ms

pcc v.

1.2.9.7 rcmm — T p-

cc [p] cp ps,

vs q s p

cf, c cs c s-

ps w ms pcc w 

exp lv (lv 6) s m v-

vs ccc w v’s

ms pcc v, s ws:

) ts ms pcc 

op lv (lv 4) s

v s c v s;

,

) ts ms pcc 

ex lv (lv 5) s

v s c v sx s.

Note 1 — Formal evaluation is not required or 

applicants who demonstrate expert language

 prociency, [that is,] native and very procient non-native speakers with a dialect or accent 

intelligible to the international aeronautical 

community.

Note 2 — Te provisions o 1.2.9 reer to Annex 

10, Volume II, Chapter 5, whereby the language

used or radiotelephony communications may be

the language normally used by the station on the

 ground or English. In practice, thereore, there

will be situations whereby fight crew members

will only need to speak the language normally 

used by the station on the ground.

 Appendix 1 [to Annex 1]:

Requirements or Profciency in

Languages Used or Radiotelephony 

Communications

t m pcc qms c-

Cp 1, Sc 1.2.9, ppc

[cs] [cs] s ms,

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 16/36

Flight SaFety Foundation • Flight SaFety digeSt • January–February 2006

L  a n g u a g e P r o f i c i e n c y  

m ccp cs ,

cmpc w [w] sc scp-

s … w iCao [i Cv

av oz] op lv (lv

4) iCao l Pcc r Sc

[p 13].

Pc spks s:

) Cmmc cv vc- (-

p/p) [ss]

c--c ss;

b) Communicate on common, concrete and

work-related topics with accuracy and

c;

c) us ppp cmmcv ss

xc msss cz

sv msss (.., cck,cm c m)

wk- cx;

) h sccss w v s

sc cs ps

cmpc xpc vs

ccs w cx

wk s cmmcv sk w

wc ws m; ,

) us c cc wc s

c cmm.

 Annex 6 to the Convention on

International Civil Aviation:

Operation o Aircrat; Part I:

International Commercial Air 

Transport — Aeroplanes

3.1.6 ops s s cw mm-

s ms spk s

s c p 

cmmcs s spc ax 1.

 Annex 6 to the Convention onInternational Civil Aviation:

Operation o Aircrat; Part III:

International Operations —

Helicopters

1.1.3 ops s s cw 

mms ms spk

s s p 

cmmcs s spc ax 1.

 Annex 10 to the Convention

on International Civil Aviation:

 Aeronautical Telecommunications;

 Volume II: Communication

Procedures Including Those With

PANS [Procedures or Air Navigation

Services] Status; Chapter 5, Aeronautical Mobile Service — Voice

Communications

5.1.1 i cmmcs, s s-

scp s sv ms.

5.1.1.1 iCao sz ps s

s ss wc s spc-

. o w sz ps c

sv smss, p

s s.

5.2.1.2.1 T - p cm-mcs s cc

m s s

es .

Note 1 — Te language normally used by the

station on the ground may not necessarily be

the language o the State in which it is located.

 A common language may be agreed upon

regionally as a requirement or stations on the

 ground in that region.

Note 2 — Te level o language prociency 

required or aeronautical radiotelephony 

communications is specied in the Appendix 

to Annex 1.

5.2.1.2.2 T es s v,

qs m cf s, ss

sv s ps

s s svcs.

 Annex 11 to the Convention on

International Civil Aviation: Air 

Trafc Services

2.28.1 a c svc pv s s

c cs spk s

(s) s p cmm-

cs s spc ax 1.

2.28.2 excp w cmmcs w

c c s cc m-

, es s

s sc cmmcs.■

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 17/36

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 18/36

14 FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

AVIATION STATISTICS

Global Passenger-mortality RiskDecreased Substantially in

 Accidents From 2000 to 2005

The risk of dying in an accident aboard a randomly chosen flight was lower than ever in the

period 2000–2005, in every industry segment examined. When passenger fatalities during the

terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were included, however, passenger-mortality risk did not

decrease on U.S. scheduled domestic passenger jet flights compared with the period 1990–1999.

— ARNOLD BARNETT, PH.D.

[FSF:iap2000Flight Saety Digest ,abaxW

pvsspss-msk

—s,sscppss

mcs—ww

scjps19871996.1

bssqppsscs

c1990s.2iwc,

zsssksmJ.1,

2000,dc.31,2005.]

M100mscsw

ccw’spsss20002005.3Tpvsc

sscscsv-

ps.Scspssss

cswpmc,wcs

mpspcskmm.

Tswpss-msk

sscwvccsscs

smssps

ws(avcWmscjs;avcWjs;

 jswavcWcs

dvpWcs;jsw

dvpW;avcW-j

mscs).4Sscsscs

mpvmsks

cc.ipsmsc

mscswavcW

—w’sss—s

wdvpW,mjs

cc-skcvcv.

Psssscspss-

mskwssc.

Tmsccvs

zscskc.

Ts,wv,cpp

mpvm.a ssc

ccmpsss,c

vpss-msk.im

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 19/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

S t a t i S t i c S

ps,scksSp.11,

2001,kmpp(cvcms

)pvsvs

ckscm.ass,wsps-

sswscs

ccs,swsqv-

cscc-pss-msk20002005scu.S.

mscjs.

Q-statistic

tcms2000Flight 

Saety Digest c1svpps

wsQ-ssc,wcpssmortal-

ity risk or a passenger on a randomly chosen ight .

TQ-sscswsqs:“gv

psscssmw

ss(..,u.K.mscps-

sjs19901999),ws

ppsssvv

?”

a ight sssppmc

(scp);“svv-

”sssmscs

vcccm/sm.(Css

,scspss

-mcv,xc.)

t Q-ssc s ccp vscmpwmsms

pss-msk.5,6rcc-

ccspssp

vvcc,Q-sscws

ccc proportion psss

k,wcss:

• isss ccw

svvmwwsvvs

svvs;

• isvcs c-ssccpp

vvcc(..,wps-

sjsm,kv

,smpcssm

wps-);

,

• issc

,csmjccs

cck/cmppc/

.7

Mv,Q-sscsscc

s.TQ-sscssm:

Q = V/N

w Q=Q-ssc

V=m-ssqvs

sns

n=mvs

T ull-loss equivalent spppss-

swsvv.(Fxmp,

scmps,-ssqv-

sz;30pcpsssk

cc,-ssqvs0.3;pssskcc,-

ssqvs1.0.)8aspps

nsvsvV.

TQ-sscssssss

c.

Zero Accident Risk 

ipvsss,scavcW

mscjsvss

w.d19901999,Q-sscws113m.a,psswk

mscvw

v36,000s

cc.9

a v pss s

1990savcWscmscj

pswcsccs

cm/scs.Csccs

,pss-m20002005

mpv,sswt1(p16).

d20002005,wppxm

75m scmscjs

avcWcs(mj c-

c uSs).npss-

wscsccany s

s.10

isms,pss-m

skcv.bcs

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 20/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200616

S t a t i S t i c S

mpvmcmpw1990sp-

smcc?evsscp-

cssssvm,ssps

cmmsvvsccqck

sccss,spswps

wvs.

Smccsmsp.

bs-ccm1990s

-cvvs20002005,6.0

-ssqvswvxpc-wJ.1,2000,dc.31,2005,

avcWmscjsvcs.Tsv,

xpmp19901999,w

sm10ccswc

vpppssskw

55pc.ic,wz

ccs,wv,10.Scscpc

sxcwp

scc.

Spcc,ppxmavc

Wmscjswcc19902005wcc2000

2005.(dqcsw

ssxsp19902005

s.)Ts,s19902005

smpvvm

cc,ppxm10cc-

s19902005svcc

20002005.n,wv,s

skcccccs

sms10mswcss.T

ps500,wcmsv

sscscccmm

ssscc.

 A World of Improvement

t2psxpt1

psss.

t 2sws, pscs-

,scpss-jps

avcWcsw

pss-mskdvp

W.asss,spspvj,

1960.10

Ppsmsk,wv,s

psscpssjps,

pss-mskpwsw-

2000200519901999.b

100pcc

pss-m sk avcW

Table 1

Passenger-mortality Risk 

From Accidents, Advanced World

Scheduled Domestic Jet Operations,

2000–2005

Q-statistic

United States 0

Other Advanced WorldCountries

0

Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened

as the statistical probability o a passenger dying on a

randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstoptrip rom one city to another (also called a “departure”).

 The Advanced World comprises countries that

are generally considered economically advanced,

technically advanced and democratic: Australia, Austria,

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,

Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg,

Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South

Arica, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom

and the United States.

Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.

Table 2Passenger-mortality Risk From Accidents During

Various Scheduled Passenger Jet Operations,

1990–1999 and 2000–2005

Type of Service

Q-statistic

1990–1999 2000–2005

Advanced World Domestic 1 in 13 million 0

Advanced World International 1 in 6 million 1 in 8 million

Between Advanced World andDeveloping World

1 in 1 million 1 in 1.5 million

Within Developing World 1 in 500,000 1 in 2 million

Note: These data exclude atalities caused by terrorist/criminal acts.

Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o a

passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom

one city to another (also called a “departure”).

 The Advanced World comprises countries that are generally considered economically

advanced, technically advanced and democratic: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada,

Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,

Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain, Sweden,

Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Developing World

comprises all other countries.

Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 21/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

S t a t i S t i c S

mscps,swt2,

wsw75pc-

cswdvp

W.Tsccsss-

csc:gvm

ccsvv,w

c75pccspss-msk

cc.

iwpsps—avc

W i bw

avcWdvpW

—csspss-m

skw1990ss

20002005wsm

wpsps.Mv,

scsswsvw

ccs,19901999p 20002005p,s

csQ-sscm

cssmc.

hwv,cxww

cspss-msk

—wcv

pscmwsssc

sc—mmps

ccpmsmpvms

mcssss

psssmssms“s-

scs”(..,wpcc

m).

as,ssmp

mpcswpss-

mskcscss

20002005.Tps

mjcskpc,ws

cccs-msk

ck.

Other Continuing

Improvement

iss-jp-s(vvcpc-

cfppcf)m

cscs,cw

spcs,sms

pppcfs

wpc

 js.i cb

W,1Q-sscu.S.msc

pp/pppswss-

ms12m19871996.

t3swscss

mcps.

Competitive Routes

tcs,

w avcW s

wvQ-sscs

dvpWs,-

csswc

smwcscm-

p,m,wavcWcdvpWc

(..,Ps,Fc,Kc,Pks).

TQ-sscws1600,000

scscss.

Tspspss

ssmcs

pss-msw

avcWsdvp

Wsm

cscs

ms.

t4(p18)swssmp

ssp.

tscssw-pws

s:When two airlines lying 

 passenger jets ly the same route, very 

rarely is there any statistically valid 

reason related to saety to preer one to

the other .Fxmp,m

20002005ssw-cs

mscjcsavc

Wwmzs-

cs:ops

s,Q-sscwszv

mmss.

Increased Threat of

Terrorism

apcm-

spsw

csss

p.hsc,ccsvc-

cmjv

s:i1990s,ws

scscm-

smavc

W.oSp.11,2001,wv,

psssu.S.mscs

wkss.12t5(p

18)ssss“vs”

ccpss-m

skcs.

ts,Q-ssc

ccswscz,Q-

sscpsssc

smcm/smwm

z11m.(i,cs

ccs,mssm

ppwkSp.11s

u.S.mscjccs1990s  

in total .)

tscscmcssv

cpss-msk

scpssjps

Table 3

Passenger-mortality Risk for

Scheduled Non-jet Operations,

Advanced World,

1990–1999 and 2000–2005

Period Q-statistic

1990–1999 1 in 2.5 million

2000–2005 1 in 5 million

Note: These numbers exclude terrorist/

criminal acts, but there were no such acts on

these services during 1990–2005.

Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is

dened as the statistical probability o a

passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight.

A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom one

city to another (also called a “departure”).

 The Advanced World comprises countries

that are generally considered economically

advanced, technically advanced and

democratic: Australia, Austria, Belgium,

Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,

Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,

Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand,

Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain,

Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom

and the United States.

Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 22/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200618

S t a t i S t i c S

dvpW.t6swscs

scwjsrss

CQ-sscsdvp

W.13

n20pcmskt

6scmsm.T,c--(75pc)mpvmsw

t2,sscwwccs,ws

cc--(67pc)v

mpvm.

Threat of Hostile Acts

iww,pss-mskmccsmpv20002005.

Wc,ccmscs

msmcmpcc

s.

Tsssxpcpc

sccspss-msk

ms/cmcs.iss

kwwSp.11ws.a

pcmsmvc:T1990s,

wwpsss

sm/cm,wpcss

s/cmcs 1980swc,

mmcsqcs,sP

amcF103,utaF772Pcc

SwsasF1771,14wcsvvs.Tsws

1990,sc.Cs-

cmssmkwsvsss

s.iw,wv,

smsswccsv

sccsswscssvcsks

m.■

Notes

1. b,a.;W,a.“PssMrsk

esmsPvPspcvsaaS.”

Flight Saety Digest Vm19(ap2000).

2. b,a.bckMmlc.“aS:

ega?” Journal o the Operational 

Research Society Vm52(as2001).

3. tppxmmsscc,

ssmpcqs

wwscsOfcial Airline Guide

(oag).(Tcqsscssb

W,op.cit .,p.12.)Tmssjc

smsmpmpcs,

Table 4

Passenger-mortality Risk for Nonstop Scheduled Jet Routes

Between Advanced World Countries and Developing World

Countries, 2000–2005

Category Q-statistic

Advanced World Airlines 1 in 1.5 million

Developing World Airlines 1 in 1.5 million

Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o a

passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom

one city to another (also called a “departure”).

 The Advanced World comprises countries that are generally considered economically

advanced, technically advanced and democratic: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada,

Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,

Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain, Sweden,

Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Developing World

comprises all other countries.

Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.

Table 5

Passenger-mortality Risk, by Cause, U.S. Scheduled Domestic

Passenger Jet Operations, 1990–1999 and 2000–2005

Period

Q-statistic

Accidents Terrorism/Crime Combined Causes

1990–1999 1 in 11 million 0 1 in 11 million

2000–2005 0 1 in 11 million 1 in 11 million

Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o apassenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom

one city to another (also called a “departure”).

Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.

Table 6

Passenger-mortality Risk, by Cause, Developing World

Scheduled Jet Operations, 2000–2005

Q-statistic

Accidents Terrorism/Crime Combined Causes

1 in 2 million 1 in 10 million 1 in 1.5 million

Note: Passenger-mortality risk (the Q-statistic) is dened as the statistical probability o a

passenger dying on a randomly chosen fight. A fight is dened as a nonstop trip rom

one city to another (also called a “departure”).

 The Developing World comprises all countries other than Australia, Austria, Belgium,

Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,

Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South Arica, Spain, Sweden,

Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Source: Arnold Barnett, Ph.D.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 23/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

S t a t i S t i c S

mpcssmss

ccscs

ccss.

4. Fppsssc,

avcWcmpsscs

cscm-

cvc,ccvc

mcc:as,as,bm,

C,dmk,F,Fc,

gm,gc,ic,i,is,

i,Jp,lxm,ns,

nwZ,nw,P,S

ac,Sp,Sw,Swz,

uKmuSs.

acs,ssc

(s38),

sdvpW.

5. Fmsvs

smpss-msk,s

bW,op. cit .,pp.12.

6. b,a.;hs,M.K.“aS:

Tlsdc.” Management Science

Vm35(J1989).

7. bCmmcaps.Statistical 

Summary o Commercial Jet Airplane

 Accidents, 1959–2004.M2005.

8. tmms-ssqv-

sscs,s

csccsscmp

aS.cm,aSnwk,

u.S.ntspSb

Flight International .

9.Tccwmm

sccQ-sscs.

Cwmmsks

psssk.Fxmp,c

cwmmsmkv

jccs

fswmspsss

swsss.F

cwmmsccwmms

mcf

mcpssvcs

cmp,wcmcsm-

skcwmms.

10. apssswss-

 jwu.S.mscjp

wCc,is,u.S.,2005,

pswsk.

11. b,a.;am,M.;Scmm,

V.“aS:Tlsdc.”

 Management ScienceVm35(J

1989).

12. oSp.11,2001,u.S.sw

jckss.twcf

(amcasF11u

asF175)ww

WtC,nwyk,nw

yk,u.S.acf(amc

asF77)wsw

PWs,d.C.,u.S.uasF93sck

Psv,u.S.,fpsss

mpcm

jcks.o-s(c-

sjcks)c81

psss,s

wpsamcF11;56ps-

ss,svsw

psuF175;58pss-

s,swps

amcF77;37pss-

s,vswps

uF93.

13. oa.24,2004,wrsss

wswms

.atpvt-234asck

wwMscw,rss,

V,w35psss

cwmmsk.at-154b

sckmMscw

Sc,w38psss

cwmms.tcs

xpsvwwck

ps.

aMcddsMd-82ws-

swscksd,

C,M7,2002.Fsc

103pssscwmms.

accmps,s

ccwcwcc

wpsp

c.ncw

vssc

cf’sssmss.S

pssssspc.

14. PamcF103kp

vlck,Sc,dc.

12,1988.axpsvc,p

Smx,s/

cssp

vcf

l,e.Fsc243

psss,sws16cwmms

11pp.

oSp.19,1989,ustsps

aés(uta)F772,Mcd

dsdC-10-30,wssw

kpvm

Sdsn.Tvs

csxps

ccwc.i

2003,lmsps

pcmpsss

156psss14cwmm-

swwk.

PccSwsas(PSa)F

1771wsmlsas,

C,u.S.,SFcsc,

C,wcwp

ssc

scmcc

bsaspc(ba)146-200’s-

sp.Wsssps

cfspvc

mpc,k38psss

vcwmms.Tvs

mx-mp

wmpfssmpcs,

wcs,

spsswps

spssss.hsw

ps.

 About the Author 

ab,P.d.,sgesm

PssMmScc

Msscssistc(Mit)

SScMm,ops

rscC.hsspcsppm-

mcmssspcmp-

c,wvsspm

smpss.hsxsvcs-

xpcv,vwk

vps,14s,u.S.F

avams(Faa)u.S.

tspScams

(tSa).hsc-cFaan

Cexccavops

rscSFC

Sgavis.i2002,

cvps’scmF

SF.d.bsc-

ppmmcs.

dvCzwsksss

sc,’sFaacc

m,KFz,pvc-

m.Tswkwssppp

gavCS

FpFaa.Psvw

scmcpss

SFFaa.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 24/36

20 FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

PUBLICATIONS

RECEIVED AT FSF JERRY LEDERER

AVIATION SAFETY LIBRARY

Increased Automation WillBring New Human FactorsChallenges to ATM

 Air traffic management (ATM) human factors specialists are working to

anticipate, and thus avoid, problems associated with greater automation.

– FSF LIBRARY STAFF

Books

Human Factors Impacts in Air rafc 

 Management.Kw,b;rs,Mk;

Scä,dk(s).as,e:

as,2005.584pp.Fs,s,x,

cs,ss.

r cmpx,cs-mcpccscs-

cmm(atM).“Tss

mcsmscm

sccsatM,ms

mscscsppm

ms,”ss.

ocsmcwkvs

ccscpss

pcmpmx

wksvpmpsvscc,scckpc

sps.

“Sccsmcsmpc-

s,” ss.“Ts

mmssqss

wk,sswss

sm,swssk

cvssw,

scsmvs

m.”

Tssmcps

scmmsv,sc

sssmcss

cckps,mcxpc

wpssatM.

“Tmscp

pvscscccss

sppcsm-

,”ss.“Wwvm

cszvcs,

sss

vpms,spps—

vvccswcs

csssswssm

ccatMv.”

Tssmws“pc

kwcwcssw

mcsmpc”(..,

cmpp c cmc

ss).a20spcsspvcps

mpszpcsm.

Tss s cpscs

ms:

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 25/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

R  e s o u R c e s

• hmcsps(..,cs

psvpcs);

• hmcsmscs(..,

mpvms-sccsss);

• hmcsms(..,ms-ccpmc);,

• hm cspms(..,

m cs cmp

pcwkpcc).

Understanding and Managing Risk Attitude.

hs,dv;M-Ws,r.

as,e:gw,2005.206pp.

ts,s,p,x.

“tmspcsskmmckwscc

sccss,vsw

wsmspcc,w

mpcvfcm

vskpcss,”ss.“a

pp-cppcskmm

wssssswsks

sm.Tsw

pvpccswv-

s,smsskpsss

sssvpss

pcc,swsmmz

mpcsswsksm

cpcv.”

Tkxpsmcsspcs

skmm,spcp

“mc.”Tsm

s“czms,s

ms,pppxpssms

wms.”ok’spmss

smscp,,pp

msk.

emccfcwspcsskmm,ss:-

ccs;ccssssm

p;ccssssmjcvs;

skspscss.

gps,swsvs,cvs

“sk.”Tsspsc

xpsssccpccscss“p-

k”(mmspmsppss

ss);“Mssc”(fps’s

skspspsp-

cspmms);“ccm”

(csmkmcspcv

zms);“sks”(c

pmsksks-

 vmmscs ck vcc);“css”(pps

sks,wpsw

wskvscsvmpss

pscccs

psppssmsps

skk).

Tsscvss-

mmskmm,s

cmpxj,smps.

Tsc“csjcvs

sscvm-pssss”;“mpvmv,

vsps”;“m

cvmwk,s

sscmm.”

 A Personal Guide or Cabin and Cockpit 

Sel Deense.Cz,dvd.bm,

i,u.S.:ahs,2005.141pp.

Fs.

“F

spsv

xcpcw

,”ss , pcc, m

u.S.Msccsscw

vcmssks.“a30,000,

pc.”

dspcsvscsc

psss’svssm,

smpssmpwps,

ss.usvv,vsc-

csmss,cs,

cps,ppcmpsscs

ccmmpvswps.

n,ss,spssvc-

sswsms.apsswpps

vckps

mcmc,cs

smccvs

wscfsmcs

ssc,ss

pswscpm

cckp.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 26/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200622

R  e s o u R c e s

Tkscssswp-

psmscqs

ssw“cscscvss,

smpc,pcs-

qsss.”

Mv,mppssssmpspscsswsccs,

ss.afpmsxpc

vszmpskv

ccmscmpsps,ms

 vsz spss w v

mc.avcss

mccss,smpc

“v,spcs,m

ssc,sssc,s

sc,smsc.”

Reports

erminal Radar Approach Control: Measures o 

Voice Communications Perormance.Pz,o.

Vk;McC,Mk.u.S.Fav

ams(Faa)ocaspc

Mc.dot/Faa/aM-05/19.Fp.

oc2005.22pp.avvi

<www..v//ps>

ntccimSvc.*

asu.S.naspcSsmvvs

mscsc

 vc cmmcs ssm -

cmpsssssms

ssms,smssmcm

pcpcmmcsmm.em

ssmswvcmps

wxsssmsccpmc

mssscssp,vcsm,

psmsspp.

Tspscs“ssp”pv

jcvqpmcmss

ccmmcsssmscsssvx

cmmcsssms.

Tsz8,000vcsms-

ssmvmppcc

(traCon)cswsm

ps48csuSs.T

cmmcsccp

wscwsmsss.

“ov,w13-s-

msssvmsmp,”

pss.“tpc,cps--kswc

wspss,cmmcs81m-

scs.ik2.5scs

mss, 127mscsps

ps--kswcwss.”

Tssck,spp-

cppsmsssw,sp

cms1.16pc

smpsmsss.bcssps

qmssxcs

svm-spms,

v14.54mssswsm-

wps cswsps

wps,v9.90msssw

smwwssp.

Flight Saety Special Issue: Bird Strike

Prevention.FSF(FSF)

tw.J2005.147pp.Fs,s,

pps.avmFSFtw.**

tbSkCmmtw(bSCtW)

wsssFSF

(FSF)sszFSFtw2001

cscvvscs

mvscspsv

skpm.dws,

bSC-tWpscspcv

ssmsp,wcspszs.

“bSC-tW[ws]sccp‘[c-

cw]fsssps

psvs’pvpp-

pmssspsswm

pspcsps,s

scssks

mwmmzskcs,”

sspc’sc.

osskpvms-

sccwssm

pss.TtwCvacs

ams1998ps

sjcws.apss

pswcmps

pmswfps.

“hwv,vw,fpsv

spvps,”c

ss.“ivsswsmp

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 27/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

R  e s o u R c e s

sswsmc

fs.”

bSC-tWccwp-mwks

spcvps

scwppws

mwsssss.

“Tpss…wf

ssss,”c

ss.“Tmwspss[tp]

SSaps.Tpss

sswsmcc

w[tpcvm].”

acspw-

s:“tCcpbSkPv,”

“TeqpmtcqsbSk

Pv,”“bSkMic

im,”“iacvsbSkPv,”“TacvsbSk

Pvtw,”“bSkass.”

 Level Bust Study Using Saety Principles.

ecexpmC.rp.

402.J2006.gzv,a;b,

C;Ps,J.81pp.Fs,s.

avesFcvi

<www.c.>.

i2003,ecxpp-

ssvss(vsmsss)smc

SMart(SMmasssc

rct).

“SMartscxc

‘ssss’mpvssp-

ps-csmk,” p

ss.“TkSMartsmk

smpsvsccs

xpc(ssss,..,

sqpm,z,,p-

cs),ps.”

Tsmcssss—cscs

cscs—ssssm

cswpcsv

ss,cvmvssm

csqcs.tscscs

pcps(SPs).

Tsscpz35

cvscsmsSPs,

mwcvcvcSPws

c.

amp’sccssw:

• “tcssms

wkpv,swksswspcccp

s(s‘pvc’),

ccv”;,

• “icmpxsspc k

tMas[mmvs],

svjcsssc

smvs.tssms

,[]v/v

mss.dp

sscvs

vwsckvsmcmcsss

cv.tcvsc

sspsw,[]s[]s

tCaS[c-csvc

ssm]pvcsv.”

Risk Factors Associated with Weather-Related 

General Aviation Accidents. u.S.n

tspSb(ntSb).ntSb/

SS-05/01.Spm2005.78pp.Fs,

s,ppxs,ps,ss.av

 vi<www.s.v>m

ntccimSvc.*

tspscsntSbsws

spcs

skcssscwsm

mccs(iMC)wvs-

.rscsccm72

vccsccwas

2003ap2004.tscss-

 vwps135swp

vcmsccs.

i,u.S.Favams(Faa)cspvmps

ccfs-ccfs,c-

sss.

Sscssws

 vssscwskw-

vccs.

Ts’sccsscw:

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 28/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200624

R  e s o u R c e s

• “Psws

wskvvw-

vccs

wsw,

[mcv]sccs

pcccvvm

m[cc]”;

• “Pc vm

cssspsm

w-kwsks”;,

• “Kwpcc-s s

sscwskp

vvw-

vcc.”

Instructional and

Management Guides

Saety Management Systems: Te Senior Airline

 Manager’s Implementation Guide.Fs.

M,Qc,C:ia

tspassc(iata),oc2005.

Fs,pps,p,xs.

avmiata.***

asmmssm(SMS)siatas“ssmcmm

skssscwfps,

psc

mccvscvvsspmc.”

Tssspvpccm-

svmpm

SMS.Tswc

SMS,wscs“op

SPm,”“emcrspsPm,”

“iataSMmSppSsm”

“impm.”

Electronic Media

Cabin Operations Saety oolkit: urbulence

 Management & Inadvertent Slide Deployment 

Prevention; Cabin Saety Management 

Systems. Sc.M,Qc,

C:iatspassc

(iata),J2006.avmiata.***

apcwkpmiataCopsStskFc,

ss2004,scmpcscks

spscs,sc-

smsvpss

cc-jsv-

spms.Tsscs

psssmmssms.

Tkcscmmpv

pcs,sc/ccss,

mcsss

xscss,mms

ccpscsssmps.

Psscsc’ss

cssmwksps.

Cspvmpc-

m m(PdF)s,McsPwP

pssiks.

Regulatory Materials

Synthetic Vision and Pathway Depictions

on the Primary Flight Display.u.S.F

avams(Faa)avs

Cc(aC)23-26.dc.22,2005.18pp.

appx.avmFaavi

<www.w..v>.

tsaCpssccpms,

ms,swcmpc

wu.S.Favrs(Fars)P23, Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility,

 Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes,

wwccpssmps:(1)sc

 vs(2)pwpcssp

vcs pmfsp.

TsaCssswccps-

wspm.■

Sources

*ntccimSvc

5285Prr

Sp,Va22161u.S.

i:<www.s.v>

**FSFtw

51,8F,n.51,Kr,Sc.2

tp110twr.o.C.

*** iatspassc(iata)

800PcVc

P.o.bx113

Mh4Z1M1Qc,C

i:<www..>

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 29/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

Cleaning Solvent Blamed for B-777Landing Gear Fire

Investigators found that the subsequent evacuation exceeded certification time limits and that

passengers were not led to a secure area.

— FSF EdIToRIAL STAFF

Twmpvs

wsspmswc

sccccsmpv

.acc/cs

spmmmv-

mcs,vzs,pss

mscs.Tsmmcc.

Fire Leads to

Recommendations or 

Expeditious Evacuations

Boeing 777. Minor damage. 31 minor injuries.

afmPks,fcwc-

cmp-cpppcmcpe.

a“smm”cw,cw

xpwspp

xwsscmmcw

c.

acvccx

ws(),cwmm-

pjcws,

c’sqc,swfms

ccp’sm.

Tcwspppxw,

csc(arFF)ps-

wcxs.TarFF

wccmmsvwppcsmsmkcm-

mvcp

s.

Pssscwmmsvc,s

vcsss

p.T-psssvarFF

pscvmjs

vc.evc332psssws

cmpms10scss

vcswsp;

wms30scs,scwmmvc.avcp,pss-

scsvcss.W

ssvpssswkwm,

pssspsswww-

svwss.

Tvs“msk

smmcpccsw

cwss,”cc

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT BRIEFS

   A   I   R

   C   A   R   R   I   E   R

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 30/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200626

 A  c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s

ps.“iwsksm-

msfmmsv,wcw

cmcsmcw

cmcm.Tcc

scw

c,wk-pckmp

wskvpv-s.”

Tvss,

wccmmvm

smkcssspw

,cwssvsms

“”cpssm.

Fmcs

m,ps.Ts

qckwscwc

.10w.

i,vs

vckcsmm

vcmqccc

—qmspsss

vc90scss

c’svxs.

assvs,u.K.a

accsivsbcss

cmms:

• tu.K.Cvava(Caa)

vwscpsss

wvvcmc

“scswmsc

c, [] s v

m/mcs s-

ssspc”;

• tvwsccw

“ws,

vvccmmv

ccmm,vc

scs xps spss,

spcvckcpcvccw”;

• tCaa q, smps,

“qccccm-

mcswc

[arFFsvc],vcc

cc,sm

v ppppm”;

,

•tCaaq“cm-

mcqcsc

ccmmcswc

[arFFsvc],v

ccc,s

c,mp-

cssscccvs.”

Tps19scswk

sb-777pswpw

J1999J2006,wcc

pwsss.os,sw

xcssvs,vsw

svscw

cmps, ws

ck;cssvs

kw.

‘Robust Monitoring’

Recommended or 

Loading Procedures

 Airbus A340. No damage. No injuries.

dfmeJp,

fcwwsp’sc-

v(Cg)wssw

wm.Tpmws cc

mvpsssw

p,wswsc

swc.Tfwsc

s,wcwccm

.

Tp’sSSvcsdpm-

vcw

v.Tcps,w

cwsw,sccsw

,cmpwwsc

wsm.

“Tswssqccc-

cscscs[pp];scsssw

m,”ps.

i,vswk

c-pc(p

scccc)

cccs

cmppssm

s.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 31/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

 A  c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s

Tpsvwu.K.a

accsivsbc

pxpc“m

qcs”p-

’svss

scmmsspcs

pcscmpvw-ssm.i,u.K.Cvav

awsmpcs,

ps.

“Wmmskswcc,s

smssmccs-

pcsf,”ps.“iccw

Cgcvvsscsqcs

svmpc

mss,,m

.”

Crew Reports Multiple

Bird Strikes While Trying to

 Avoid Flock 

 Airbus A320. Minor damage. No injuries.

afmns,cw

wsccppcp

i.dppc,cp-

svfckssmw.

h-wm

c100.

d-,scwfw-

p150sw

pfck,ssv

mpcs.

apws,mssv-

ssww.

aspcpsv

sws.2,

wspc-fp,

ss.

Tcpsskc-

cw-sccvswp-

ssp.

“isp-sccvs…p-

 vv cqs mp,

s-skpv smpss

cvpcs,”

ps.

Faulty Transistor Blamed or 

Smoke on Flight Deck 

Embraer EMB 145EP. Minor damage.No injuries.

dfmei,s

pwswF

lv(Fl)100(ppxm10,000)v

Fc,fcwwskp

p.

l,wcsFl270,cw-

cs,sw,

smkwsscp’ss.a

smm,cp’spmsp,

mcsp,mm

ccw-

ssm.tpspmmccssmkck,

xmskssmks,c

mcskcc

pFc.

a,cwcvxscs

ms()p

wwcwm;ss,ps-

sssmkvms

cw.(Csp

ccws p

csppm,smkwsqc.)

Mcpssc

smks.1iC-600vcs

cmp,wccsfcks-

ps.assqxmqpm

mcss

,wcsv

cmps.

TvsvsQuick

Reference Handbook (Qrh)mpc-scvmv

cmp’s.assvs-

,u.K.aaccsivsbc

cmmem“ps

pc[Qrh]…wc

ssmfsmsc

iC-600vcs

cmp.”emscmpws

ccvs.

   A   I   R

   T   A   X   I   /   C   o   M   M   U   T   E   R

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 32/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200628

 A  c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s

Bolt Installation Cited in

Landing Gear’s Failure to

Extend

Piper PA-34-200T Seneca II. Minor damage. No injuries.

nmscfnw

Z,psc

“doWn,”“landinggearunSaFe”w-

xs.Tpsv

sx.

hscppcsm-

cxspcs,

ssx.o

pcs, c w ck

pc--,s

xs.

hp,w-

c,ssw.

avss

xcscsp-

cm“jmmss[]

ssm,”cc

ps.

Tpss-

ccmcwks

c.Ccsw“v-scmpm

psscksc.”

Double Engine Failure Leads

to Landing in Mud Flats

Piper PA-31-350 Chietain.Substantial damage. No injuries.

tpwsfw-p

 vsf scfas

wpsw40cms(74kms)p.asp

sscf,

pcvccmcc

ccvsppc.

aspps

1,000,cmc,c

s.h-

pmfswsp.

Tpss

smm,ws,

ms.hsmxcs

w-csspmps

mssc;-

spwvcs,s.

ac,236s(62u.S.-

s)wcvmks.

Tkscpc728s(192u.S.

s),c38s(10u.S.s)

s.aspcssm

cm-sccsw

pcc,sw

cmk-vssmws

cm.npmsw-

sssmsm

vcs.

Tkswsmv

300s(79u.S.s)f,

msccmpf.

Tccpsp,w

sfwcmp’semeMb110P1

bps,pcsc

b’scvs“lo

idle”p-ccks.

“Tcscsws

smC’s-mx

cs,”ps.“MvC’s

mxcspscssw‘lo

idle’bwspfw

sss

cmpsspw.…

“Tcws[]1,000w

pcsspw,s

wsscmpsp--

ccks.…Tvsws

csmvc

smss.”

Photos Enable In-fight Analysis

O Landing Gear Problem

Gulstream Aerospace Gulstream V.No damage. No injuries.

Skmpu

Ss,sfcwmpc

   C   o

   R   P   o   R   A   T   E   /   B   U   S   I   N   E   S   S

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 33/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February2006

 A  c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s

,m-

c.Tcwcc

cckscs,wcccc-

,mcm

 jmmpxps.

dwpssvw-pp,mcps

ppp’sc-

.gsmaspcsvw

ppscwwcs

kx.Tcw

psxsk.

Tvswsc.

Tire Fails on Touchdown

Raytheon Beech 390 Premier I.Substantial damage. No injuries.

ismmccspvpuSs.

Wpcw,m

,pv.

Tpsfwp

w,kxpc“

f”pcw

.

Fire Fighting Airplane

Strikes Ground During

Familiarization Flight

 Air Tractor AT-602. Destroyed.One atality.

ts-spwsfwv

wasspp’s

mzwc,wcws

sw-ppps.

apmpswsssswwmsp

,w-p,

ws“wsw…wcs

wwmc.”a

wpcmp,p’s

spcpp

spcwp

sc.Wssswsv

pmsssws

pwcs

sw.

Tpsp—wpvs

fwcps

pw-ppps—

cmp sss cx,ks

s,p,c-

smspswpsss

w.Tp’scp,wws

vs,ss,s

mzfs,ppcckp

p,wcpw-p

wsw.

Tcpsppws

csvsw—

smm msss.

Maintenance Personnel

Extinguish Landing Gear Fire

Cirrus Design SR22. Substantial damage.No injuries.

tpwsccxx

pmpuSs

wcpcc

wmp’sm-

ws.

Tpwpsssxp.

T-xswssc

xsfms.twmc

ccsmsc

-cpcxss

xsfms.

apmccpsvw

ccsswsvsmvs

ccCsSr20Sr22ps.

Landing Gear Breaks Ater 

Touchdown on Grass Airstrip

Extra EA 300. Minor damage. No injuries.

tpwsm

f, p

ssspe

psm.

   o   T   H   E   R

   G   E   N   E   R   A   L   A   V   I   A   T   I   o   N

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 34/36

FlightSaFetyFoundation•FlightSaFetydigeSt•January–February200630

 A  c c i d e n t s / i n c i d e n t s

Tpspcw

wmws

cwwsm.

Tmk

ss,cspw

ssp.

awcssscw

mccwvm290

ssvks11ks.Tps

scwwsm340ssxks.

Mcpssp’s

mcscqvs

spc

s.

Tccps,ws,“wspssp-xswk-

ssm.”

Helicopter Strikes Branch

During Anti-poaching Flight

Bell 206L-3 LongRanger. Minor damage.No injuries.

t

cpwsfw-

pc p pk

tzwpcswsv.Tp

ccscsw

wcmpscsmk.h

cckfs,

wwcmpsw

cp.

Tps,ss

cps,sc

vm.acm,

“s”cp

w.hmvcp-

smc.

 Wheel Breaks Through

Helipad Deck 

 Agusta A109C. Substantial damage.Two minor injuries.

acpp

asw pss

smkwscp,

pppccvpccpp-

.hcp“c”

,ccps.

Tpppcccpcc

mccvpccps,cpsckw

pvk.Txm

ccscp’s

mwkp

ck.

Tpscsccw

“mmmcp

cmpssspcscss

sc-cp

p…wskw,”“c-

cppwsssqssasa109C

cp”“pcck-

fwpwscp

sccpsmpsas

a109Ccp.”

Kneeboard Position Cited in

Landing Accident

Robinson R22 Beta. Substantial damage.One minor injury.

tspwspp

cp-pf

niw,smpmv

cccc,cc

kscmsp

sk.Tscc

pvpmcc,

mpc,p

s-c

p.Tcpw,sk

sck,cp

ss.

Tccpsf,

pswsq

ccwcccck-

s

sf,xpccsc.

Tpmcmpp

scf,w—w

pvwm—p

cpvx.■

   R   o   T   o   R   C   R   A   F   T

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 35/36

Now you havethe saety tools

to make a dierence.

The Flight Saety Foundation is a comprehensive and practical resource on

compact disc to help you prevent the leading causes o atalities in commercial aviation:

approach-and-landing accidents (ALAs), including those involving controlled fight into terrain (CFIT).

Put the FSF to work or you TODAY!• SeparateliesavingactsromctionamongthedatathatconrmALAsandCFITaretheleadingkillersinaviation.UseFSFdata-drivenstudiestoreveal

eye-openingactsthatarethenutsandboltsotheFSF ALAR Tool Kit .

• VolunteerspecialistsonFSFtaskorcesromtheinternationalaviationindustrystudiedtheactsanddevelopeddata-basedconclusionsandrecommendationstohelppilots,airtraccontrollersandotherspreventALAsandCFIT.Youcanapplytheresultsothiswork—NOW!

• Reviewanindustrywideconsensusobestpracticesincludedin34FSFALAR Briefng Notes .Theyprovidepracticalinormationthateverypilotshouldknow…but the FSF data confrm that many pilots didn’t know — or ignored — this inormation .Usethesebenchmarkstobuildnewstandardoperatingproceduresandtoimprovecurrentones.

• Relatedreadingprovidesalibraryomorethan2,600pagesoactualinormation:sometimeschilling,butalwaysuseul.AversatilesearchenginewillhelpyouexplorethesepagesandtheothercomponentsotheFSF ALAR Tool Kit .(ThiscollectionoFSFpublicationswouldcostmorethanUS$3,300ipurchasedindividually!)

• PrintinsixdierentlanguagesthewidelyacclaimedFSFCFIT Checklist ,whichhasbeenadaptedbyusersoreverythingromcheckingroutestoevaluatingairports.ThisproventoolwillenhanceCFITawarenessinanyfightdepartment.

• Fiveready-to-useslidepresentations—withspeakers’notes—canhelpspreadthesaetymessagetoagroup,andenhancesel-development. TheycoverATCcommunication,fightoperations,CFITprevention,ALAdataandATC/aircratequipment.Customizethemwithyourownnotes.

• An approach and landing accident: It could happen to you! This19-minutevideocanhelpenhancesaetyoreverypilot—romstudenttoproessional—intheapproach-and-landingenvironment.

• CFIT Awareness and Prevention :This33-minutevideoincludesasoberingdescriptionoALAs/CFIT.Andlisteningtothecrews’wordsandwatchingtheaccidentsunoldwithgraphicdepictionswillimprintanunorgettablelessonoreverypilotandeveryairtraccontrollerwhoseesthisvideo.

• Manymoretools—includingposters,theFSFApproach-and-landing Risk Awareness Tool andtheFSFApproach-and-landing Risk Reduction Guide —areamongthemorethan590megabytesoinormationintheFSFALAR Tool Kit .Aneasy-to-navigatemenuandbookmarksmaketheFSFALAR Tool Kit user-riendly.Applicationstoviewtheslidepresentations,videosandpublicationsareincludedontheCD,whichisdesignedtooperatewithMicrosotWindowsorAppleMacintoshoperatingsystems.

Tool Kit

Flight Safety Foundation

Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction

Order the FSF :

Memberprice:US$40Nonmemberprice:$160Quantitydiscountsavailable!

Contact:AhlamWahdan,membershipservicescoordinator,+1(703)739-6700,ext.102.

Recommended System Requirements:

Windows®

• APentium®-basedPCorcompatiblecomputer• Atleast128MBoRAM• Windows98/ME/2000/XPsystemsotware

Mac® OS

• A400MHzPowerPCG3orasterMacintoshcomputer• Atleast128MBoRAM• MacOS8.6/9,MacOSXv10.2.6–v10.3x

MacOSandMacintosharetrademarksoAppleComputerInc.registeredintheUnitedStatesandothercountries.MicrosotandWindowsareeitherregisteredtrademarksortrademarksoMicrosotCorp.intheUnitedStatesand/orothercountries.

 TheFSFALAR Tool Kit isnotendorsedorsponsoredbyAppleComputerInc.orMicrosotCorp.

7/30/2019 High Stakes in Language Proficiency

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/high-stakes-in-language-proficiency 36/36

For seminar inormation, contact Namratha Apparao,

tel: +1(703) 739-6700, ext. 101; e-mail: [email protected].

To sponsor an event, or to exhibit at the seminar, contact Ann

Hill, tel: +1(703) 739-6700, ext. 105; e-mail: [email protected].  

present the 

51st annual corporate aviation safety seminar CASS

aviation safety supporting  the 

corporate mission

may 9–11, 2006

phoenix, arizona

Want more inormation about Flight Saety Foundation?

Contact Ann Hill, director, membership and developmentby e-mail: <[email protected]> or by telephone: +1 (703) 739-6700, ext. 105.

 Visit our Internet site at <www.fightsaety.org>.

We Encourage Reprints

Articles in this publication, in the interest o aviation saety, may be reprinted in whole or in part, but may not be oered or sale directly or indirectly,used commercially or distributed electronically on the Internet or on any other electronic media without the express written permission o Flight Saety Foundation. All uses must credit Flight Saety Foundation, Flight Safety Digest , the specifc article(s) and the author(s). Please send two copies o thereprinted material to the Publications Department. Tese restrictions apply to all Flight Saety Foundation publications. Reprints must be ordered romthe Foundation.

What’s Your Input?

In keeping with the Foundation’s independent and nonpartisan mission to disseminate objective safety information, FSF publications solicit credible contributionsthat oster thought-provoking discussion o aviation saety issues. I you have an article proposal, a completed manuscript or a technical paper that may beappropriate or Flight Safety Digest , please contact the director o publications. Reasonable care will be taken in handling a manuscript, but Flight Saety Foundation assumes no responsibility or material submitted. Te publications sta reserves the right to edit all published submissions. Te Foundationbuys all rights to manuscripts and payment is made to authors upon publication. Contact the Publications Department or more inormation.

Flight Saety Digest

Copyright © 2006 by Flight Saety Foundation Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN 1057-5588

Suggestions and opinions expressed in FSF publications belong to the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by Flight Safety Foundation. Tis information is not intended to supersede operators’/manufacturers’ policies,

practices or requirements, or to supersede government regulations.

Sta: Mark Lacagnina, senior editor; Wayne Rosenkrans, senior editor; Linda Werelman, senior editor;Rick Darby, associate editor; Karen K. Ehrlich, web and print production coordinator; Ann L. Mullikin, production designer;

Susan D. Reed, production specialist; and Patricia Setze, librarian, Jerry Lederer Aviation Saety Library 

Subscriptions: One year subscription or 12 issues includes postage and handling: US$280 or members/US$520 or nonmembers. Include old and new dd h dd h hl hd b h d l h d