IMAGE QUALITY. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
High resolution spatial and electrical modeling for efficient BIPV system design
-
Upload
sandia-national-laboratories-energy-climate-renewables -
Category
Technology
-
view
115 -
download
0
Transcript of High resolution spatial and electrical modeling for efficient BIPV system design
High-resolution spatial and electrical modeling for efficient BIPV system design
Johannes Hofer, Arno Schlueter
Architecture & Building Systems, Institute of Technology in Architecture, ETH Zurich
6th PV Performance Modeling and Monitoring Workshop
Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE
October 24 and 25, 2016 | Freiburg | Germany
Opportunities for BIPV and thin-film PV
2
• Growing opportunity for PV in buildings due to energyregulation (EU NZEB, MuKEn)
• Increasing efficiency andreduced cost of thin-film PV (CIGS, CdTe, OPV, etc.)
• Lightweight and flexible, partial transparency, different colors
• New integration possibilities(buildings, transport, consumerelectronics, etc.)
• Low cost production andinstallation
Source: www.beautiful-light.eu
Source: www.pv-magazine.com
BIPV Applications
3
www.coltinfo.co.uk
SwissTech convention centerwww.archiexpo.com
Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture
NEST HiLo Project
4
HiLo building to be constructed in 2017 at NEST (EMPA, Switzerland)
• Leightweight integrated roof and floor
• Thin-film PV applications (curved roof modules, adaptive solar facade)
Further information:
www.empa.ch/web/nest/
www.hilo.arch.ethz.ch
Challenges and Objective
5
Challenges
• Non-uniform irradiance (due to partial shading or curvature) generatesimbalance between PV cells and modules
• Performance of thin-film modules in partial shading and under curvaturenot well known
• No adequate design and planning tools
Objectives
• Creating a modeling framework coupling high-resolution geometry, irradiance, electrical simualtion
• Compare and validate with experimental analysis
• Apply in context of NEST HiLo project
Modelling Workflow
6
Electrical model(Matlab/Python)
IV characteristicsPower generation
Irradiance model(RADIANCE/DIVA)
Shading calculationModule irradiance
CAD model(Rhinoceros
3D/Grasshopper)
PV geometryModule positioning
Building parameters
PV system parameters
Electrical designWeather data
Geometric Model and Shading Analysis
7
J. Hofer et al., Energy Science and Engineering, 4, 2, 134-152, 2016
A. Groenewolt et al., Int J Energy Environ Eng, 2016
PV modules on the roof PV modules on the facade
• Parametric model (Rhino/Grasshopper) to
simulate PV modules on roof and facade
• Triangulation method for layout of PV strips
• Parameters: module dimension, module
distance, strip orientation, etc.
Irradiance Analysis
8
Sun directions
• Cumulative sky approach (Radiance): matrix of sky patch values using the Perez all-weather model and hourly weather data
• High resolution sky using the Reinhart sky patch subdivision
• Backward ray tracing to calculate irradiance on geometry
• Irradiance model with sub-cell resolution (same as the electrical model)
PV Electrical Model
9
Modules
• Cells split in sub-cells, simulated with one diodemodel
• Reverse breakdown
• Bypass diodes
PV system
• Series-parallel interconnection of modules
• Distributed electronics(power optimizer ormicroinverter)
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
PV Module Layout
10
Electrical layout parameters
• Cell dimension
• Cell arrangement andinterconnection
• Module bypass diodes
Designs investigated
• Commercial CIGS modules
• Modules defined byindustrial partner
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
Performance in Partial Shading
11
Longitudinal shadingLateral shading
• Measurement of I-V curves in various partial shading conditions
• Module design and shading pattern strongly affect power loss
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
lateralshaded
not shaded
longitudinal
shaded not shaded
Performance in Partial Shading
12
• Comparison of model vs. experiment (module 1)
• Further comparison model/experiment for other module designs andinterconnected modules
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
Design of PV as Shading Element
13
• Parametric 3D design of different adaptive shading system configurations
Horizontal louvers (1-axis) Vertical louvers (1-axis) Diamond pattern (2-axis)
• Calculate electric performance and
optimize system design
• Module arrangement and spacing
• Cell orientation
• String interconnection
• Bypass diode integration
J. Hofer et al., Energy Science and Engineering, 4, 2, 134-152, 2016
Facade cover ratio (FCR) =
module area / facade area
Design of PV as Shading Element
14
• Applied in context of Adaptive Solar Façade (ASF) project
• PV cell orientation and placement of bypass diodes strongly affect energy yield
P. Jayathissa et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
J. Hofer et al., Energy Science and Engineering, 4, 2, 134-152, 2016
Performance of Curved PV Modules
15
• Simulation of irradiance and power outputof curved modules (design 1)
• Flat horizontal module for comparison
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
Performance of Curved PV Modules
16
• Flat horizontal: efficiency mainly determined by temperature
• Curved: mismatch of irradiance between cells leads to efficiency loss
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
Performance of Curved PV Modules
• Experimental measurements using digitally fabricated prototype with same predefined geomtery
• Very similar dependence of efficiency observed (for this module design)
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
Application to HiLo Building
18
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
PV Module Layout
19
Irradiance and electricity yield vs. orientation
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
PV System Electrical Design
20
• Simulate irradiance distribution between
cells and modules
• Optimize electrical layout
• Power optimizers to balance mismatch
J. Hofer et al., European Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016
Conclusions
21
Summary
• Framework for modeling of PV modules in non-uniform irradiance
• PV module and system layout strongly influences the performance
• Can be used for efficient system design
Outlook
• Identify PV module designs less sensitive in partial shading / curvature
• Measurements with a full scale ASF and a section of actual HiLo roof
• Evaluate module level electronics to balance mismatch
Acknowledgement
• NEST HiLo team
• Industrial partner
• Sponsors
22
w w w . f l i s o m . c o m
Contact: [email protected]
Architecture& Building Systems: www.systems.arch.ethz.ch