oto:HYBRlD MZ HYBRID MZ .65 Ptx»to : 1200cc SWIFT HYBRID ...
Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz
-
Upload
fernando-hernandez -
Category
Documents
-
view
419 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz
![Page 1: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Dietary Protein and Energy Effects on Broiler Live Performance to 42 Days
F. I. L. Hernandez1, D. R. Korver2, R. A. Renema2, M. J. Zuidhof1
1Alberta Agriculture and Food, Agriculture Research Division, AB. Canada
2Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, AB. Canada
![Page 2: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Problem
• Story of the fat chicken – Producers were paid for BW and this resulted in carcasses with high fat content
![Page 3: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objective
• Evaluate the effects of different protein and energy levels on performance of broilers
![Page 4: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Materials and Methods
• 3,700 Chicks • 2 x 2 x 3 x 5 factorial experiment
– 2 sexes– 2 prestarter nutrient densities (High and Low)
• Prestarters were nested within Sex x ME x DBP– 3 levels of metabolizable energy (ME) - 94, 97 and 100
% of COBB recommendations for maximizing growth and FCR
– 5 levels of dietary balanced protein (DBP) – 85, 92.5, 100, 107.5 and 115 % of recommendations
![Page 5: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Parameters measured – Body weight – Feed intake– Carcass yield (breast, wings, legs)
• Statistical analysis– Data were analyzed as a four way factorial using the
MIXED procedure of SAS (2003)
Materials and Methods
![Page 6: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hypothesis
• High energy diets increase deposition as fat• High protein diets increase lean meat• Decrease dietary protein reduce yield• Decrease dietary protein increase feed intake
![Page 8: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Results
![Page 9: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Effect of Early Nutrition on BW
0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.42.62.83.03.23.43.63.84.0
0 7 11 14 21 28 36 42 49 56Age (days)
BW
(kg
)
2.50
2.60
2.70
2.80
BW (k
g)
High Low
Prestarter
PS Level P<0.0001
![Page 10: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2.3
2.5
2.7
94.0% 97.0% 100.0%
Energy (% of recommended)
BW
(kg
)
P=0.40
Effect of ME on 42 d BW
![Page 11: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2.3
2.5
2.7
85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0%
Protein (% of recommended)
BW
(kg
)
P=0.0005
b
a a a
b
Effect of DBP on 42 d BW
![Page 12: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
Males Females
Sex
BW
(kg
)
P<0.0001
a
b
BW (42 d)
![Page 13: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Body Weight (42 d)
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
BW
(kg
)
94%
97%
100%
85.0
%
92.5
%
100.
0%
107.
5%
115.
0%
DBP*ME*Sex P=0.003ME*Sex P=0.025
DBP*Sex P=0.0003
Males
Females
Protein (% of recommended)
En
erg
y (%
of
reco
mm
end
ed)
![Page 14: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Feed Intake (0 - 42 d)
100.0
2100.0
4100.0
6100.0
85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0%
Protein (% of recommended)
Fee
d (
g)
bab a
bab
P=0.04
![Page 15: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Effect of Energy on Feed Intake
100
2100
4100
6100
94.0% 97.0% 100.0%
Energy (% of recommended)
Fee
d (
g)
P=0.17
![Page 16: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Effect of Sex on Feed Intake to 42 d
100.0
2100.0
4100.0
6100.0
Males Females
Sex
Fee
d (
g)
ab
P<0.0001
![Page 17: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Feed Intake
100
2100
4100
6100
Fee
d (
g)
94%
97%
100%
85.0
%
92.5
%
100.
0%
107.
5%
115.
0%
Males
Females
DBP*ME*Sex P=0.027ME*Sex P=0.849DBP*Sex P=0.014Protein (% of recommended)
En
erg
y (%
of
reco
mm
end
ed)
![Page 18: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Feed Conversion Ratio (11 to 42d)
2.061 a1.915 b
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Females MalesSex
FC
R
Sex P<0.0001
![Page 19: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Feed Conversion Ratio (11 to 42d)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0%
FC
R
MalesFemales
Sex*DBP P<0.0650Protein (% of recommended)
bcd abc a ab abcd
![Page 20: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0%
Protein (% of recommended)
Wei
ght (
g)
Evis-BW P=0.0076Wings P<0.0001Breast P<0.0001
Effect of Dietary Balance Protein on Carcass Yield
Other
Wings
Legs
Breasta
ab ac
bc
bc bc
ab a
ab
bc c
ac
EBW
bc
![Page 21: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
460
470
480
490
500
510
85.0% 92.5% 100.0% 107.5% 115.0%
Protein (% of recommended)
Wei
gh
t (g
)
a
ab
P<0.0001
Breast Yield
a
bc
c
![Page 22: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Carcass Yield
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
94.0% 97.0% 100.0%
Energy (% of recommended)
Wei
ght (
g)
a
ab b a
ab b
Wings P=0.0860Breast P=0.0811
Other
Wings
Legs
Breast
![Page 23: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Carcass Yield
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Females Males
Sex
Wei
gh
t (g
)
Evis-BW P<0.0001Wings P=0.0018Breast P=0.0759
b
a
ab
Ev-BW
WingsLegs
Breast
Other
![Page 24: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
High Low
Prestarter
Wei
gh
t (g
)
Evis-BW P=0.0118Wings P=0.0748Breast P=0.9251
Effect of Prestarter on Carcass Yield
a b EBW
Wings
Legs
Breast
![Page 25: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Feed Intake to 11 d
341 337335 326
0
100
200
300
400
High LowPrestarter
Fee
d (
g/b
ird
)
Males
Females
PS P=0.14Sex P=0.09
PS*Sex P=0.66
![Page 26: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Nutrient Intakes to 11 d
0
20
40
60
80
100
High Low
Prestarter
Pro
tein
in
take
(g
)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
En
erg
y In
take
(kc
al)
CPME
ab
ab
CP ME
PS <.0001 0.0002Sex 0.0879 0.0882PS*Sex 0.6661 0.6586
![Page 27: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Conclusions
• High prestarter increased BW at 42 days – 2.73 vs 2.66 kg
• Breast yield increased with increasing DBP – 1 g of breast meat for every 1.5% increase in DBP
• Males were more efficient than females– 1.91 vs 2.06 FCR
![Page 28: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Future Research
• Maximize carcass value• Predict performance under different nutritional
regimes
![Page 29: Hernandez.Atlanta080107.Mz](https://reader033.fdocuments.net/reader033/viewer/2022052901/55689b2bd8b42aaa798b4fa6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Acknowledgments
• Alberta Livestock Industry Development Fund• Agriculture and Food Council• Poultry Industry Council• University of Alberta• Alberta Agriculture and Food• Cobb-Vantress• Alberta Chicken Producers• Maple Leaf