HERD Urban Health Rapid Assessment of Municipalities Poster

1
Background The census of 2011 identified that 17% of Nepal’s population live in urban areas. While Nepal may be less urbanised than its neighbours, it is also the most rapidly urbanising country in South Asia with 6.7% growth in urban compared to 2.3% growth in rural areas (Muzzini 2013). To understand how well these expanding urban communities can access health services , across six municipalities of Nepal: HERD have been providing essential health care through the Manohara Community Health Centre (MCHC) to an urban slum community in Kathmandu since 2008. To understand the feasibility of providing EHCS quantitative clinic data was analysed. Methods Rapid Assessment of Municipalities: HERD in conjunction with Primary Health Care Revitalisation Division (MoHP) visited six municipalities to conduct a rapid assessment of urban health facilities. Team members from HERD and PHCRD visited: •Birgunj •Bharatpur •Biratanagar •Bhadrapur •Sidharthanagar •Butwal Meetings were conducted with district health officials, including the focal person for urban health in the municipality. Data was collected on the umber of urban health centres, their management, level of coordination between district health offices and the municipalities, challenges faced by the UHCs and suggestions for improvement. Manohara Community Health Centre (MCHC): The data from the MCHC for a period 2008 to 2014 was collected and analysed. Services analysed included TB, Immunisation, Safe Motherhood and Family Planning Lack of clarity on roles of DPHO, Municipalities and UHC No guidelines for UHC operation No supervision and monitoring Weak coordination between DPHO and Municipalities No formal coordination structures or forums Lack of staff with appropriate skill mix to deliver services Not all have Health assistants; Some without Auxiliary Nurse Midwives leading to poor ANC provision Human resource limitations Poor remuneration and untimely budget release disrupting salary disbursements. UH volunteer not recognized as national volunteer (FCHVs) Confusion whether recruitment is responsibilty of District Public Health Office or Municipality. Limited ownership for urban health by Municipalities Many municipalities haven’t allocated resources (financial and HR) for UH Lack of Infrastructure Many UHCs didn’t their own building; lack of separate rooms for ANC, FP Lack of equipment, registers, drugs Poor service and lack of monitoring PO Box 24133, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: 4 23 80 45, 4 10 20 72 Fax: 4 10 20 16 www.herd.org.np Health Research and Social Development Forum (HERD) Maharjan, U., Baral, S., Giri, S., Khimbanjar, S., Khanal, S., Rumble, C. This work has highlighted challenges to the provision of EHCS to the urban poor. There is a need for improvements in infrastructure and for greater coordination with clear lines of responsibility established. A health centre like Manohara Community Health Centre are important to provide EHCS to the urban poor. A national Urban Health Policy and guidance are essential to delivering EHCS to the urban poor with services targeted to marginalised communities. Municipality Municipal Population UHCs Staff working at UHCs Birgunj 139,068 4 HA (3); ANM (4); AHW (4); Helper (4) Bharatpur 143,836 4 HA ( 2); ANM (3); CMA (1); AHW (2); Helper (4) Biratanagar 197,711 5 AHW (14); ANM (9) Bhadrapur 18, 607 2 HA (2); 1 (ANM) Sidharthanagar 65, 629 2 HA (4); ANM (4); AHW (4) Butwal 118,462 4 HA (4); ANM (4); AHW (4) Key Findings from Municipality Assessment Results from Manohara clinic The Manohara slum population is currently an estimated 4,500 population. The clinic sees an average of 10,000 patients per year. Conclusions Objectives •To understand current service provision of Essential Health Care Services (EHCS) to the urban poor •To analyse service delivery in one clinic for the urban poor in Kathmandu 0 50 100 150 200 250 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Totally Immunised Children by Outreach and Manohara Clinic Outreach clinic Manohara Clinic Family planning Clients by Ethnicity 2008-2014 Dalit Disadvantaged Janajati Disadvantaged non dalit terai Religious Minorities Relatively advantaged Janajatis Upper caste groups Others Total 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ANC Visits: The Challenge of Providing 4 ANC Sessions 1st ANC 4th ANC Manohara Urban Clinic 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total Number of Registered TB Cases

description

A poster summarising the key findings and conclusions from a rapid assessment of urban health facilities across six municipalities in Nepal. Conducted by Health Research and Social Development Forum (HERD), the work highlights the need for better coordination and clearer lines of responsibility in delivering essential health care services (EHCS) to the urban poor.

Transcript of HERD Urban Health Rapid Assessment of Municipalities Poster

  • Background

    The census of 2011 identified that 17% of Nepals population live in urban areas. While Nepal may be less urbanised than its neighbours, it is also the most rapidly urbanising country in South Asia with 6.7% growth in urban compared to 2.3% growth in rural areas (Muzzini 2013). To understand how well these expanding urban communities can access health services , across six municipalities of Nepal:

    HERD have been providing essential health care through the Manohara Community Health Centre (MCHC) to an urban slum community in Kathmandu since 2008. To understand the feasibility of providing EHCS quantitative clinic data was analysed.

    Methods

    Rapid Assessment of Municipalities:

    HERD in conjunction with Primary Health Care Revitalisation Division (MoHP) visited six municipalities to conduct a rapid assessment of urban health facilities. Team members from HERD and PHCRD visited:

    Birgunj

    Bharatpur

    Biratanagar

    Bhadrapur

    Sidharthanagar

    Butwal

    Meetings were conducted with district health officials, including the focal person for urban health in the municipality. Data was collected on the umber of urban health centres, their management, level of coordination between district health offices and the municipalities, challenges faced by the UHCs and suggestions for improvement.

    Manohara Community Health Centre (MCHC):

    The data from the MCHC for a period 2008 to 2014 was collected and analysed. Services analysed included TB, Immunisation, Safe Motherhood and Family Planning

    Lack of clarity on roles of DPHO,

    Municipalities and UHC

    No guidelines for UHC operation

    No supervision and monitoring

    Weak coordination between DPHO

    and Municipalities

    No formal coordination structures or forums

    Lack of staff with appropriate skill

    mix to deliver services

    Not all have Health assistants;

    Some without Auxiliary Nurse Midwives

    leading to poor ANC provision

    Human resource limitations

    Poor remuneration and untimely budget

    release disrupting salary disbursements.

    UH volunteer not recognized as national

    volunteer (FCHVs)

    Confusion whether recruitment is

    responsibilty of District Public Health Office or

    Municipality.

    Limited ownership for urban health by Municipalities

    Many municipalities havent allocated

    resources (financial and HR) for UH

    Lack of Infrastructure

    Many UHCs didnt their own building; lack of

    separate rooms for ANC, FP

    Lack of equipment,

    registers, drugs

    Poor service and lack of monitoring

    PO Box 24133, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Tel: 4 23 80 45, 4 10 20 72

    Fax: 4 10 20 16 www.herd.org.np

    Health Research and

    Social Development Forum (HERD)

    Maharjan, U., Baral, S., Giri, S., Khimbanjar, S., Khanal, S., Rumble, C.

    This work has highlighted challenges to the provision of EHCS to the urban poor. There is a need for improvements in infrastructure and for greater coordination with clear lines of responsibility established. A health centre like Manohara Community Health Centre are important to provide EHCS to the urban poor. A national Urban Health Policy and guidance are essential to delivering EHCS to the urban poor with services targeted to marginalised communities.

    Municipality Municipal

    Population

    UHCs Staff working at UHCs

    Birgunj 139,068 4 HA (3); ANM (4); AHW (4);

    Helper (4)

    Bharatpur 143,836 4 HA ( 2); ANM (3); CMA (1);

    AHW (2); Helper (4)

    Biratanagar 197,711 5 AHW (14); ANM (9)

    Bhadrapur 18, 607 2 HA (2); 1 (ANM)

    Sidharthanagar 65, 629

    2 HA (4); ANM (4); AHW (4)

    Butwal 118,462 4 HA (4); ANM (4); AHW (4)

    Key Findings from Municipality Assessment

    Results from Manohara clinic

    The Manohara slum population is currently an estimated 4,500

    population. The clinic sees an average of 10,000 patients per year.

    Conclusions

    Objectives

    To understand current service provision of Essential Health Care Services (EHCS) to the urban poor

    To analyse service delivery in one clinic for the urban poor in Kathmandu

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    Totally Immunised Children by Outreach and Manohara Clinic

    Outreach clinic Manohara Clinic

    Family planning Clients by Ethnicity 2008-2014

    Dalit

    Disadvantaged Janajati

    Disadvantaged non dalit terai

    Religious Minorities

    Relatively advantaged Janajatis

    Upper caste groups

    Others

    Total

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

    ANC Visits: The Challenge of Providing 4 ANC Sessions

    1st ANC

    4th ANC

    Manohara Urban Clinic

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

    Total Number of Registered TB Cases