Helping Program Assessment Using Automated Text Processing

20
Helping Program Assessment Using Automated Text Processing Anne Gilman SoTL Brown Bag 25 Sept 2013

description

Helping Program Assessment Using Automated Text Processing. Anne Gilman SoTL Brown Bag 25 Sept 2013. Finding questions we hadn't thought to ask. ..in what students say. Assesment Tools. The Law of the Instrument: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Helping Program Assessment Using Automated Text Processing

Page 1: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Helping Program Assessment Using Automated Text Processing

Anne Gilman

SoTL Brown Bag

25 Sept 2013

Page 2: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

Finding questions we hadn't thought to ask...

..in what students say.

Page 3: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Assesment Tools

The Law of the Instrument:

“Give a small boy a hammer, and he will find that everything he encounters needs pounding.”

-Abraham Kaplan

Page 4: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Assesment Tools

Are there tools that can help us ..to articulate goals

we take for granted? ..to point in new

directions?

Page 5: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Cool Hand LIWC

Page 6: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Data

LiM participant essays 57 from 2007-2012

Holistic ratings 23 Director’s Cut Totals:

9 Excellent 11 Good 3 Just barely makin’ it

Page 7: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

LiM AssignmentIn a paper of at least two pages, discuss what the Language in

Motion experience has meant for YOU. Be as specific as possible and provide examples where relevant.

 Consider the following:A. Why did you choose to participate in Language in Motion? What

personal goals, both short and long term, did you have for this experience? Were they met? If so, how well? If not, why not?

 B. In what areas have you improved your skills and/or knowledge?

Consider what you learned about the following:

Your second language, if any, The topic(s) of your presentations, Your home culture, Your second culture, American education, Presentation skills: Organization, ability to give clear directions,

adjustment of content to audience (age and knowledge level), etc. Yourself: Communication or cross-cultural communication abilities, time

management, self-confidence, flexibility, leadership, etc.

C. Was there something you wanted to learn through this

experience that you didn’t? If so, what was it and why did you not learn it? Is there something we should do differently?

Page 8: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

What did LIWC say?

Page 9: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

What did liwc say?

Page 10: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Next Steps:

Analyze by paragraph Consider value of enjoyment Look under the hood

9/2

5/1

3

Page 11: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Can we look under the hood?

Page 12: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Topic sorting c. 1974

Page 13: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Self-organizing maps c. [guess!]

Page 14: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Are these more familiar?

Hoping the XPS viewer works in our room!

9/2

5/1

3

Page 15: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

Sample LiM Wordles

Page 16: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

What's a trigram?

Demo

Page 17: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Results: Cluster-to-Category Match9

/25

/13

Rating Cl-1 Cl-2 Cl-3

Adequate 0 2 1

Good 6 2 3

Excellent 6 1 1

Better: Talking less about

your own country zzt, zto, top

TBD: Less: tha More: ent, eth

Page 18: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

Next Steps

Get more ratings Add more trigrams Compare to LiM, ILAC goals Consider POEs

Page 19: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

9/25/13

Many Many Thanks

LiM Director: Dr. Deb Roney Gilman Lab Assistants

LIWC project: Helen Hu, Aric Koestler, Olivia Moody, Sungouk Park, Seth Weil

Trigram project: Tori Rehr, Tori Buser Dr. Kim Roth The Juniata Department of Psychology The SoTL Leadership & the Lakso Fund

Page 20: Helping Program Assessment Using  Automated Text Processing

Gory Details > aggregate(limtrunc[-1], by=list(cluster=fittrunc.km$cluster), mean) cluster age all and ati den 1 1 0.002255296 0.002815929 0.007260874 0.006236264 0.002169403 2 2 0.004112582 0.002038445 0.006445021 0.007287239 0.003207497 3 3 0.001498536 0.002247922 0.007557460 0.006659985 0.004155337 ent ere ers ese est 1 0.007423606 0.003938757 0.002885631 0.003315418 0.003273650 2 0.010172528 0.003758447 0.001438849 0.005238279 0.003749762 3 0.010626493 0.004926549 0.002321635 0.004856809 0.003323920 eth eve for. hat her 1 0.003958753 0.002694240 0.003256768 0.005716957 0.003714643 2 0.002908776 0.002441420 0.002277172 0.004412824 0.002856234 3 0.003351811 0.002440801 0.003763736 0.002332821 0.003069785 ing ion zto zzt ver 1 0.008014828 0.005659334 0.001344568 0.001344568 0.003019872 2 0.008223715 0.009158820 0.001807482 0.001807482 0.001872784 3 0.005631146 0.006514531 0.004178863 0.004178863 0.003330204 ter tha the thi tio 1 0.002892176 0.005949131 0.01666473 0.003739603 0.005432872 2 0.002505902 0.004485792 0.01535570 0.003083640 0.008802554 3 0.002784424 0.003212007 0.01513814 0.004036677 0.006142843 top tth nts ons opi 1 0.002193457 0.003513021 0.002240106 0.002399789 0.001670029 2 0.002822616 0.002456230 0.002990221 0.002544836 0.002204109 3 0.005067310 0.002195498 0.003912161 0.002463628 0.004443421 ore pia pre rea res 1 0.002220215 0.001284905 0.003154103 0.003108067 0.004400721 2 0.001488311 0.001586731 0.005186367 0.002198381 0.005775334 3 0.002816267 0.004117230 0.004174962 0.003289315 0.005404926 sth 1 0.002374196 2 0.002569780 3 0.002009747