Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10
10/16/2010 1 17 17 Maintenance and Reliability Maintenance and Reliability 17 - 1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8e Principles of Operations Management, 8e PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl Additional content from Gerry Cook Outline Outline Global Company Profile: Orlando Utilities Commission The Strategic Importance of 17 - 2 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Maintenance and Reliability Reliability Improving Individual Components Providing Redundancy Outline Outline – Continued Continued Maintenance Implementing Preventive Maintenance Increasing Repair Capabilities 17 - 3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Increasing Repair Capabilities Autonomous Maintenance Total Productive Maintenance Techniques for Enhancing Maintenance Learning Objectives Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to: should be able to: 1. Describe how to improve system li bilit 17 - 4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall reliability 2. Determine system reliability 3. Determine mean time between failure (MTBF) Learning Objectives Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to: should be able to: 4. Distinguish between preventive and breakdown maintenance 17 - 5 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall breakdown maintenance 5. Describe how to improve maintenance 6. Compare preventive and breakdown maintenance costs 7. Define autonomous maintenance Orlando Utilities Orlando Utilities Commission Commission Maintenance of power generating plants Every year each plant is taken off-line for 1-3 weeks maintenance E th h l ti tk 17 - 6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Every three years each plant is taken off-line for 6-8 weeks for complete overhaul and turbine inspection Each overhaul has 1,800 tasks and requires 72,000 labor hours OUC performs over 12,000 maintenance tasks each year

description

 

Transcript of Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

Page 1: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

1

1717 Maintenance and Reliability

Maintenance and Reliability

17 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

PowerPoint presentation to accompany PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10e Operations Management, 10e Principles of Operations Management, 8ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e

PowerPoint slides by Jeff HeylAdditional content from Gerry Cook

OutlineOutline

Global Company Profile: Orlando Utilities CommissionThe Strategic Importance of

17 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Maintenance and ReliabilityReliability

Improving Individual ComponentsProviding Redundancy

Outline Outline –– ContinuedContinued

MaintenanceImplementing Preventive MaintenanceIncreasing Repair Capabilities

17 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Increasing Repair CapabilitiesAutonomous Maintenance

Total Productive MaintenanceTechniques for Enhancing Maintenance

Learning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesWhen you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to:should be able to:

1. Describe how to improve system li bilit

17 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

reliability2. Determine system reliability3. Determine mean time between failure

(MTBF)

Learning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesWhen you complete this chapter you When you complete this chapter you should be able to:should be able to:

4. Distinguish between preventive and breakdown maintenance

17 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

breakdown maintenance5. Describe how to improve maintenance6. Compare preventive and breakdown

maintenance costs7. Define autonomous maintenance

Orlando Utilities Orlando Utilities CommissionCommission

Maintenance of power generating plantsEvery year each plant is taken off-line for 1-3 weeks maintenanceE th h l t i t k

17 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Every three years each plant is taken off-line for 6-8 weeks for complete overhaul and turbine inspectionEach overhaul has 1,800 tasks and requires 72,000 labor hoursOUC performs over 12,000 maintenance tasks each year

Page 2: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

2

Orlando Utilities Orlando Utilities CommissionCommission

Every day a plant is down costs OUC $110,000Unexpected outages cost between $3 0 000 d $600 000 d

17 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

$350,000 and $600,000 per dayPreventive maintenance discovered a cracked rotor blade which could have destroyed a $27 million piece of equipment

Strategic Importance of Strategic Importance of Maintenance and ReliabilityMaintenance and Reliability

The objective of maintenance and The objective of maintenance and reliability is to maintain thereliability is to maintain the

17 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

reliability is to maintain the reliability is to maintain the capability of the systemcapability of the system

Strategic Importance of Strategic Importance of Maintenance and ReliabilityMaintenance and Reliability

Failure has far reaching effects on a firm’sOperationReputation

17 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

ProfitabilityDissatisfied customersIdle employeesProfits becoming lossesReduced value of investment in plant and equipment

Maintenance and ReliabilityMaintenance and Reliability

Maintenance is all activities involved in keeping a system’s equipment in working orderReliability is the probability that a

17 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

y p ymachine will function properly for a specified time

Important TacticsImportant Tactics

ReliabilityImproving individual componentsProviding redundancy

17 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

MaintenanceImplementing or improving preventive maintenanceIncreasing repair capability or speed

Maintenance ManagementMaintenance ManagementEmployee Involvement

Partnering with maintenance personnel

Skill trainingReward systemEmployee empowerment

Results

Reduced inventoryImproved quality

17 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Maintenance and Reliability Procedures

Clean and lubricateMonitor and adjustMake minor repairKeep computerized records

Improved qualityImproved capacityReputation for qualityContinuous improvementReduced variability

Figure 17.1

Page 3: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

3

ReliabilityReliability

Improving individual components

Rs = R1 x R2 x R3 x … x Rn

17 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

where R1 = reliability of component 1R2 = reliability of component 2

and so on

Overall System ReliabilityOverall System Reliability

e sy

stem

(per

cent

)

100 –

80 –

60 –

17 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Rel

iabi

lity

of th

e

Average reliability of each component (percent)

| | | | | | | | |100 99 98 97 96

40 –

20 –

0 –

Figure 17.2

Rs

R3

.99

R2

.80

Reliability ExampleReliability Example

R1

.90

17 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Reliability of the process is

Rs = R1 x R2 x R3 = .90 x .80 x .99 = .713 or 71.3%

Product Failure Rate (FR)Product Failure Rate (FR)Basic unit of measure for reliability

FR(%) = x 100%Number of failuresNumber of units tested

17 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

FR(N) = Number of failuresNumber of unit-hours of operating time

Mean time between failures

MTBF = 1FR(N)

Failure Rate ExampleFailure Rate Example20 air conditioning units designed for use in NASA space shuttles operated for 1,000 hoursOne failed after 200 hours and one after 600 hours

FR(%) = (100%) = 10%2

17 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

FR(%) = (100%) = 10%20

FR(N) = = .000106 failure/unit hr220,000 - 1,200

MTBF = = 9,434 hrs1.000106

Failure Rate ExampleFailure Rate Example20 air conditioning units designed for use in NASA space shuttles operated for 1,000 hoursOne failed after 200 hours and one after 600 hours

FR(%) = (100%) = 10%2Failure rate per trip

17 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

FR(%) = (100%) = 10%20

FR(N) = = .000106 failure/unit hr220,000 - 1,200

MTBF = = 9,434 hrs1.000106

FR = FR(N)(24 hrs)(6 days/trip)FR = (.000106)(24)(6)FR = .153 failures per trip

Page 4: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

4

Providing RedundancyProviding RedundancyProvide backup components to increase reliability

Probability of first

Probability of needing

Probability of second

17 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

+ xof first component

working

of needing second

component

of second component

working

(.8) + (.8) x (1 - .8)= .8 + .16 = .96

Redundancy ExampleRedundancy ExampleA redundant process is installed to support the earlier example where Rs = .713

R1

0 90

R2

0 80

R3Reliability has

17 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

0.90

0.90

0.80

0.80 0.99

= [.9 + .9(1 - .9)] x [.8 + .8(1 - .8)] x .99= [.9 + (.9)(.1)] x [.8 + (.8)(.2)] x .99= .99 x .96 x .99 = .94

increased from .713 to .94

MaintenanceMaintenance

Two types of maintenancePreventive maintenance –routine inspection and servicing

17 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

p gto keep facilities in good repairBreakdown maintenance –emergency or priority repairs on failed equipment

Implementing Preventive Implementing Preventive MaintenanceMaintenance

Need to know when a system requires service or is likely to failHigh initial failure rates are known as

17 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

infant mortalityOnce a product settles in, MTBF generally follows a normal distributionGood reporting and record keeping can aid the decision on when preventive maintenance should be performed

Computerized Maintenance Computerized Maintenance SystemSystem

Output Reports

Inventory and purchasing reports

Equipment parts list

Equipment hi t t

Data Files

Equipment file with parts list

Maintenanceand work order

schedule

Repair

17 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 17.3

history reports

Cost analysis (Actual vs. standard)

Work orders– Preventive

maintenance– Scheduled

downtime– Emergency

maintenance

Personnel data with skills, wages, etc.

Inventory of spare parts

Repair history file

Maintenance CostsMaintenance CostsThe traditional view attempted to balance preventive and breakdown maintenance costs Typically this approach failed to

17 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

yp y ppconsider the true total cost of breakdowns

InventoryEmployee moraleSchedule unreliability

Page 5: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

5

Maintenance CostsMaintenance CostsTotal costs

osts

Preventive maintenance costs

17 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 17.4 (a)

Breakdown maintenance costs

Co

Maintenance commitment

Traditional View

costs

Optimal point (lowestcost maintenance policy)

Maintenance CostsMaintenance Costs

sts

Total costs

Full cost of breakdowns

17 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 17.4 (b)

Cos

Maintenance commitment

Full Cost View

Optimal point (lowestcost maintenance policy)

Preventive maintenance costs

Maintenance Cost ExampleMaintenance Cost ExampleShould the firm contract for maintenance on their printers?

Number of Breakdowns

Number of Months That Breakdowns Occurred

0 2

17 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

0 21 82 63 4

Total : 20

Average cost of breakdown = $300

Maintenance Cost ExampleMaintenance Cost Example1. Compute the expected number of

breakdownsNumber of

BreakdownsFrequency Number of

BreakdownsFrequency

17 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

0 2/20 = .1 2 6/20 = .31 8/20 = .4 3 4/20 = .2

∑ Number of breakdowns

Expected number of breakdowns

Corresponding frequency= x

= (0)(.1) + (1)(.4) + (2)(.3) + (3)(.2)= 1.6 breakdowns per month

Maintenance Cost ExampleMaintenance Cost Example2. Compute the expected breakdown cost per

month with no preventive maintenance

Expected breakdown cost

Expected number of breakdowns

Cost per breakdown= x

17 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

breakdown cost of breakdowns breakdownx

= (1.6)($300)= $480 per month

Maintenance Cost ExampleMaintenance Cost Example3. Compute the cost of preventive

maintenance

Preventive Cost of expected breakdowns if service Cost of +

17 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

e e t emaintenance cost breakdowns if service

contract signedCost oservice contract

=

+

= (1 breakdown/month)($300) + $150/month= $450 per month

Hire the service firm; it is less expensive

Page 6: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

6

Increasing Repair Increasing Repair CapabilitiesCapabilities

1. Well-trained personnel2. Adequate resources3. Ability to establish repair plan and

17 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

priorities4. Ability and authority to do material

planning5. Ability to identify the cause of

breakdowns6. Ability to design ways to extend MTBF

How Maintenance is How Maintenance is PerformedPerformed

Operator(autonomous maintenance)

Maintenance department

Manufacturer’s field service

Depot service(return equipment)

Competence is higher as we t th i ht

17 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Figure 17.5

Increasing Operator Ownership Increasing Complexity

Preventive maintenance costs less and is faster the more we move to the left

move to the right

Autonomous MaintenanceAutonomous MaintenanceEmployees accept responsibility for

ObserveCheck

17 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

AdjustCleanNotify

Predict failures, prevent breakdowns, prolong equipment life

Total Productive Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)Maintenance (TPM)

Designing machines that are reliable, easy to operate, and easy to maintain

17 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Emphasizing total cost of ownership when purchasing machines, so that service and maintenance are included in the cost

Total Productive Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)Maintenance (TPM)

Developing preventive maintenance plans that utilize the best practices of operators, maintenance departments and

17 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

maintenance departments, and depot serviceTraining for autonomous maintenance so operators maintain their own machines and partner with maintenance personnel

Techniques for Enhancing Techniques for Enhancing Maintenance Maintenance

SimulationComputer analysis of complex situations

17 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Model maintenance programs before they are implementedPhysical models can also be used

Page 7: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

7

Techniques for Enhancing Techniques for Enhancing Maintenance Maintenance

Expert systemsComputers help users identify problems and select course of action

17 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Automated sensorsWarn when production machinery is about to fail or is becoming damaged The goals are to avoid failures and perform preventive maintenance before machines are damaged

More on Maintenance More on Maintenance ––

A simple redundancy formulaProblems with breakdown and preventive maintenance

Supplemental MaterialSupplemental Material

17 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Predictive maintenancePredictive maintenance toolsMaintenance strategy implementationEffective reliability

Providing Redundancy Providing Redundancy ––An Alternate FormulaAn Alternate Formula

P(failing) = 1- P(not failing) = 1 - 0.8 = .2

The reliability of one pump =The probability of one pump not failing = 0.8

If there are two pumps with the

17 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

P(failure of both pumps) =P(failure) pump #1 x P(failure) pump #2

P(failure of both pumps) = 0.2 x 0.2 = .04P(at least one pump working) =

1.0 - .04 = .96

same probability of not failing

Problems With Breakdown Problems With Breakdown MaintenanceMaintenance

“Run it till it breaks”Might be ok for low criticality equipment or redundant systems

17 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Could be disastrous for mission-critical plant machinery or equipmentNot permissible for systems that could imperil life or limb (like aircraft)

Problems With Preventive Problems With Preventive MaintenanceMaintenance

“Fix it whether or not it is broken”Scheduled replacement or adjustment of parts/equipment with a well established service life

17 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

a well-established service lifeTypical example – plant relampingSometimes misapplied

Replacing old but still good bearingsOver-tightening electrical lugs in switchgear

Another Maintenance StrategyAnother Maintenance StrategyPredictive maintenancePredictive maintenance – Using advanced technology to monitor equipment and predict failures

Using technology to detect and predict imminent equipment failure

17 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

q pVisual inspection and/or scheduled measurements of vibration, temperature, oil and water qualityMeasurements are compared to a “healthy” baselineEquipment that is trending towards failure can be scheduled for repair

Page 8: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

8

Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance ToolsTools

Vibration analysisInfrared ThermographyOil and Water Analysis

17 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Oil and Water AnalysisOther Tools:

Ultrasonic testingLiquid Penetrant Dye testingShock Pulse Measurement (SPM)

Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance Vibration AnalysisVibration Analysis

Using sensitive transducers and instruments to detect and analyze vibrationTypically used on expensive mission-

17 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Typically used on expensive, mission-critical equipment–large turbines, motors, engines or gearboxesSophisticated frequency (FFT) analysis can pinpoint the exact moving part that is worn or defectiveCan utilize a monitoring service

Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance Infrared (IR) ThermographyInfrared (IR) Thermography

Using IR cameras to look for temperature “hot spots” on equipmentTypically used to check electrical

17 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

equipment for wiring problems or poor/loose connectionsCan also be used to look for “cold (wet) spots” when inspecting roofs for leaksHigh quality IR cameras are expensive –most pay for IR thermography services

Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance Oil and Water AnalysisOil and Water Analysis

Taking oil samples from large gearboxes, compressors or turbines for chemical and particle analysis

Particle size can indicate abnormal

17 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Particle size can indicate abnormal wear

Taking cooling water samples for analysis – can detect excessive rust, acidity, or microbiological foulingServices usually provided by oil vendors and water treatment companies

Predictive Maintenance Predictive Maintenance Other Tools and TechniquesOther Tools and Techniques

Ultrasonic and dye testing – used to find stress cracks in tubes, turbine blades and load bearing structures

Ultrasonic waves sent through metal

17 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Ultrasonic waves sent through metalSurface coated with red dye, then cleaned off, dye shows cracks

Shock-pulse testing – a specialized form of vibration analysis used to detect flaws in ball or roller bearings at high frequency (32kHz)

Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Strategy ComparisonComparison

Maintenance Strategy Advantages Disadvantages

Resources/ Technology Required

Application Example

Breakdown No prior work required

Disruption of production, injury or death

May need labor/parts at odd hours

Office copier

17 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Preventive Work can be scheduled

Labor cost, may replace healthy components

Need to obtain labor/parts for repairs

Plant relamping, Machine lubrication

Predictive Impending failures can be detected & work scheduled

Labor costs, costs for detection equipment and services

Vibration, IR analysis equipment or purchased services

Vibration and oil analysis of a large gearbox

Page 9: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

9

Maintenance Strategy Maintenance Strategy ImplementationImplementation

Predictive

100%

80%

Percentage of Maintenance Time by Strategy

17 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Breakdown

Preventive

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Year

60%

40%

20%

0%

Is Predictive Maintenance Is Predictive Maintenance Cost Effective?Cost Effective?

In most industries the average rate of return is 7:1 to 35:1 for each predictive maintenance dollar spentVibration analysis IR thermography and

17 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Vibration analysis, IR thermography and oil/water analysis are all economically proven technologiesThe real savings is the avoidance of manufacturing downtime – especially crucial in JIT

Predictive Maintenance and Predictive Maintenance and Effective ReliabilityEffective Reliability

Effective Reliability (Reff) is an extension of Reliability that includes the probability of failure times the probability of not detecting imminent failure

17 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

gHaving the ability to detect imminent failures allows us to plan maintenance for the component in failure mode, thus avoiding the cost of an unplanned breakdownReff = 1 – (P(failure) x P(not detecting failure))

How Predictive Maintenance How Predictive Maintenance Improves Effective ReliabilityImproves Effective Reliability

Example: a large gearbox with a reliability of .90 has vibration transducers installed for vibration monitoring. The probability of early detection of a failure is .70. What is

17 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

ythe effective reliability of the gearbox?Reff = 1 – (P(failure) x P(not detecting failure))

Reff = 1 – (.10 x .30) = 1 - .03 = .97Vibration monitoring has increased the effective reliability from .90 to .97!

Effective Reliability CaveatsEffective Reliability CaveatsPredictive maintenance only increases effective reliability if:

You select the method that can detect the most likely failure mode

17 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

You monitor frequently enough to have high likelihood of detecting a change in component behavior before failureTimely action is taken to fix the issue and forestall the failure (in other words you don’t ignore the warning!)

Increasing Repair Increasing Repair CapabilitiesCapabilities

1. Well-trained personnel2. Adequate resources

17 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

3. Proper application of the three maintenance strategies

4. Continual improvement to improve equipment/system reliability

Page 10: Heizer om10 ch17-maintenance and reliability

10/16/2010

10

17 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,

recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.