Hedge Funds for the 2010s

52
Hedge Funds for 2010s Dr Drago Indjic London Business School Sunningdale Capital LLP 15 January 2009 GSB Barcelona, Uni. Pompeu Fabra,

description

Barcelona GSE Financial Institutions Seminar: Drago Indjic Quantitative Investment Manager and Technologist Investment Manager, Blue White Alternative Investments; Project Manager, Hedge Fund Centre (London Business School) More information about Barcelona GSE Financial Institutions Seminars: http://j.mp/BGSEFinSems Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Barcelona GSE or those of the home institution of the author(s).

Transcript of Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Page 1: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Hedge Funds for 2010sDr Drago Indjic

London Business SchoolSunningdale Capital LLP

15 January 2009GSB Barcelona, Uni. Pompeu Fabra,

Page 2: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Warnings

• The views are my own– Not Sunningdale Capital LLP, London

Business School etc• Biases

– By a “quant”, not an economist– Instant history bias

• Length is only two hours (or less)

Page 3: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Contents

• Status– Some numbers– Regulation

• Quick Introduction– “User manual”– Structure rather than composition

• Trends• Q & A

Page 4: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Alternative Investments• Many definitions ...

– Valuation and liquidity: no secondary market• Search for uncorrelated, “absolute” returns

– “absolute” (“cash + x”) objective ≠ tracking index • Many leading funds allocate to alternative

investments– Not just real estate or private equity– Not indirectly: many structured investments failed

or returned cash– Alternative investment strategies: non-β (or –β);

exotic payoff

Page 5: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Post-Festum• “Investor redemptions were widespread

and indiscriminate across fund strategies, regions, asset sizes and performance dynamics”– Many funds had to restrict investor outflows to

protect their remaining investors– by applying “gates”, suspending redemptions

or NAV calculation or even by fund restructurings and creating “side-pockets”

Page 6: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

2009: Recovery

• CY investable HF indices:14-19%

Page 7: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

A Few More 2009 Numbers

• HFRI (non-investable) / HFRX indices– Fund Weighted 20% / Global 13.4%– FoF Composite 11% /RV MS 42%– RV FI CB 58.4% / 42.4%– Macro Total 4% / -2.6%

Page 8: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Status Quo

• Total assets of $1 trillion– ~ 30% down (Huw van Steenis, MS)– Record $152 billion in withdrawals during

4Q08 (HFR)– The biggest redemptions were by FoHF, also

to fund private-equity commitments. – NB. ETF iShares $~0.36 tn s ing le counterparty

(inflows ~0.1t)

Page 9: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

“Oversold”

Page 10: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Critical but Stable• Systemic stress costs $9tn, damaged investments• Crisis not caused by hedge funds (witch hunt – e.g.

short sellers, etc)

• Investment banks are investment fund counterparties: they increased portfolio funding risk, even defaulted – Rehypothecation.

Page 11: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

What is Risk Then?

• Not just variance• Loss of capital• Correlation• Beta• Liquidity• Access to capital (“return of capital”)

Page 12: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Capital PreservationGlobal Equity Hedge Funds

January 2008 100 100

December 2008 55 80

December 2009 ~65 ~94

• Stability: lower variance and drawdowns

Page 13: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Hedge Fund Products (1)• Hedge funds: micro businesses

– Owner/manager, entrepreneurs: SME in capital markets (credited)

– Innovation, grassroots brands• Legal fund structures

– Not just off-shore anymore– “Open by invitation” and risky– Labeling may be false “signalling” of skill-

based investment?

Page 14: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Products (2)

• Funds of hedge funds– Best “Alpha” is still packaged in hedge fund

form, but illiquid• Synthetic

– Passive alternatives: “alternative Beta”, commoditised and liquid (ETF)

– →Decouple Alpha and Beta, mean and tail; fair liquidity premium

Page 15: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

What is (not) a hedge fund?

• Investment structures blurring– UCITS mutual hedge funds, absolute return

funds • Indexes

– Reuters Lipper TASS; Morningstar MSCI; HFR

• “A placebo is a medical procedure that has no medicine in it”

Page 16: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Regulations

• Legal structures– http://www.hedgefundmatrix.com/en/overview.cfm

• EU– Prohibition-like? AIMA lobbying– future of listed, OEIC, ETP

• Distribution ≈ investor “protection”– (In)dependent 3rd Party Marketers: case

study: Sandra Manzke; commissions and incentives

Page 17: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Trustee Regulatory Constraints

Page 18: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Above Law or Under It

• “Optimal intervention”– (+) Regulation of distribution; off- vs on-shore

(“import / export”); service providers– (-) Corporate governance: minority investor

rights, non-voting shares, claw back• Market efficiency policing

– Social enterprise, not prop trading and “OPM”

Page 19: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Asset Control

• Lehman, Madoff: lessons learned– Valuation fraud + fund control– Fund seizure and forced liquidation

• Structurally liquid portfolio components– Liquidity management– Non-commingled custody; separated

managed accounts

Page 20: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Capital Market Policing

• Great Accidents: – LTCM (12 years ago): leverage– Amaranth (5): overbetting– Maddoff (1): security fraud

• Small accidents– Market timers– Death spiral “private” convertibles

Page 21: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Hedge Fund Techniques

• Only legal– Madoff ≠ hedge fund

• Borrowing– Cash: Leverage– Securities: short selling

• Hedging• Non-standard instruments

Page 22: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Operational Risk• Valuation

– Fund Administrators: “independent directors” ordered to suspend NAV calculation

– value of “audit” (Enron) • Counterparty

– Lehman (7c/$) ; Sentinel (est. 40c/$) – Cash investments – “money market” funds not

AAA?• “Due dilligencing”

Page 23: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Investment Strategies

• Beyond taxonomy– Insight from replication techniques

• Best α is ideally like “extremophile bacteria”– Astrobiology

Page 24: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Reminder: 2008 Performance

One hedge fund strategy was the top performer

Page 25: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Liquidity of strategies0

2040

6080

Managed Futures

Duration

Cou

nt

0 31 60 90 120 150 1800

510

15

Fixed Income: Mortgage-Backed

Duration

Cou

nt

0 60 130 210 390

Page 26: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Aggregated Transparency

• "One of the challenges that we need to address (...) is to have a common language to describe derivatives. Every firm uses a different set of terminologies, a different set of representations to describe their derivatives portfolios."– Kenneth Griffin, Citadel, U.S. House

Committee, November 13, 2008.

Page 27: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Case Study

• Institutional investors: increased liabilities– “BA/Iberia pension fund”

• Mandate Search– Structure, performance, correlation, liquidity

management, costs

Page 28: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

2009 Case study

• Supranational reserve pension fund• Strategic allocation advise

– 3% to “defensive” investment strategies – Diversified fund of hedge funds (FoHF)– At least 10 year track record– Negative correlation to equity and bonds– Low volatility, EURIBOR target

Page 29: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Fund Liabilities

• Macro view: shortfalls and underfunding – Low inflation, government deficits ...

• Regulation and mandate– Legal risk: asset control and contractual

liquidity• Competition

– How to outperform peers and benchmarks?

Page 30: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

FoHF Universe: AgeAge vs FoHF.AUM

10.01 , 19.2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Age

% u

nive

rse

Page 31: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

FoHF: VolatilityReturn vs Volatility

Montly Data from 31-03-99 to 31-03-09

-7%

-2%

3%

8%

13%

18%

23%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

Volatility

ACR

Page 32: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

FoHF: Decorrelation

Return vs Correlation to MSCI WorldMontly Data from 31-03-99 to 31-03-09

-7%

-2%

3%

8%

13%

18%

23%

-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Correlation

ACR

Return vs Correlation to MSCI World (Down)Montly Data from 31-03-99 to 31-03-09

-7%

-2%

3%

8%

13%

18%

23%

-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Correlation

ACR

Page 33: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Indirect Cost• Monthly redemptions, 45 days notice• Quarterly, 65 bd, 12 month Lockup• Quarterly, 120d, 20% gate• Quarterly, 60d OR Monthly 35d @ 2%• 1y hard Lockup, 2.5y soft lockup @ 6%,

1/3 per year, 2/3 @ 6% with 20% gate• …• Anniversaries, side pockets, side letters …

Page 34: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

“Normal” Market

Page 35: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

FoHF Liabilities

• Duration of liabilities is structurally mismatched to assets (hedge funds)

020

040

0Fund of Funds

Duration

Cou

nt

0 90 215 360 498 750

Page 36: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

“Normal” Liquidity Target

Page 37: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Oct-08 Apr-09 Oct-09 Apr-10 Oct-10 Apr-11 Oct-11 Apr-12

S Fund (MP=100%, GI=0%) - Redemption

S Fund (MP=0%, GI=0%) - Redemption

S Fund (MP=0%, GI=100%) - Redemption

S Fund (MP=100%, GI=0%) - Still at risk

S Fund (MP=0%, GI=0%) - Still at risk

S Fund (MP=0%, GI=100%) - Still at risk

Liquidity Crisis

Page 38: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Alpha vs Beta Distributors

• Fund of hedge funds are still required– Best managers are packaged as hedge funds– Inc. regulation, accessibility, monitoring ....

• But they failed in 2008– Blocked assets by mismanaging liquidity: gated,

suspended redemptions, restructured ...– Underweighted systematic strategies– Sold Beta at Alpha price– Industry AUM reduced by 1/3 or more

Page 39: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Page 39 Indjic – 30 Sep 2008

FoF Underperformance

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

< -3

-3 to

-2.5

-2.5

to -2

-2 to

-1.5

-1.5

to -1

-1 to

-0.5

-0.5

to 0

0 to 0.

5

0.5 to

1

1 to 1.

5

1.5 to

2

2 to 2.

5

2.5 to

3

3 to 3.

5

3.5 to

4

4 to 4.

5

4.5 to

5

5 to 5.

5

5.5 to

6

6 to 6.

5

6.5 to

7

7 to 7.

5

7.5 to

8

8 to 8.

5

8.5 to

9 >9

Returns (May 2007 - May 2008)

• %FoF outperforming Alternative Beta replicator

Page 40: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Shipping Performance• Navigate in the high seas of illiquidity

NB. Risk, optimisation et al quant tools irrelevant

Fees

Liquidity

BetaHF

Capacity

Counterparty

Page 41: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Conclusions

• Increased regulation– “False positive” test for hedge fund– Safer custody– Calls for “Financial Product Safety Board” like

FDA in the US (Lo, Stiglitz)

• Optimise liquidity and Beta• hybrid Alpha (satellite) + ETF/ synthetic (core)

Page 42: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Takeaway

• Managing investments relative to benchmark index ≠ managing to preserve capital

• Long only equity investment managers lost ~50% twice during 2000s

• Costs and fees– Indexing (passive) << benchmark relative

(traditional active) < <skilled (highly active)

Page 43: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

3 Year Old Alternative Beta

Page 44: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Product Design/Selection

• Plan• Objective, target, mandate, delegation and

approval

• Structuring• Regulation: Listing, domicile, liquidity; Capacity

• Marketing– “(UCITS hedge) providers intend to launch

despite higher costs and lower returns”, FTfm Jan 11th, 2010

Page 45: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Evolving Packaging• Wrappers, feeders, guarantees etc.

• No customer choice – vs 401k (US), SIPP (UK), private/HNW clients

Alpha Legal Form Beta Distribution Fees/Cost0 ETF “Constant” “Safe for public”,

PLC~0

UCITS

Non-UCITS (FCP)

“High” Cayman 0 “Unsafe”, private LP “High”

Page 46: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Packaging Innovation

• NAV denomination experiments: valuation fiat money vs “real” units– commodities like oil, gold, CPI baskets?

• Santander’s Maddoff investors– Repay in 2% prefs @10 years: better

response than UBP, UBS (Holocaust custodian) and others (esp. FoHF)

Page 47: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Big Lesson

Page 48: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Future

• Capital protection and diversification– Maintain exposure to (liquid) alternative

investments– Non-traditional sources: e.g. convertible

arbitrage, managed futures• Indices and benchmarks can be

“alternative”– Convergence of long and hedged strategies

(UCITS, indices)

Page 49: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Downside Risk• Hedged strategies outperform: smaller

losses, lower variance

• Long-only strategies are riskier

Page 50: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Research

• Alpha/Beta/Gamma separation• Optimal contracting: fees decomposition into α, β

subject to options (inc. clawbacks); pricing α; active portfolio insurance (Δ risk appetite cursors)

• Demand in equilibrium: passive indexing (Beta, ETF) vs skilled

• Liquidity • Corporate law requires illiquid funds to be frozen in

order to prevent them becoming insolvent• Fund governance

Page 51: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

Principles Revisited

• A Green Pig Down Wall Street, A. Inechien

• Perpetual Innovation– Bookstaber, R. (2007) “A Demon of Our Own

Design”, Wiley• Incentives

– Das, S. (2006) “Traders, Guns and Money”, FT Prentice Hall; Shiller & Axlerod (2009) “The Animal Spirit”; Hare, D. “Power of Yes”

Page 52: Hedge Funds for the 2010s

References• www.london.edu/hedgefunds• www.aima.org• Indjic, D., Billieux, S. (2009) “Feature: Hedge

Fund Redemptions, Hedge Fund Value”, Professional Investor, CFA UK , Spring 2009

• Kärki, J. P., Indjic, D. (2009) “A new investment paradigm: Alpha-Beta separation”, Euromoney Hedge Fund Handbook 2009; the Hedge Fund Journal, November 2008