Heavy Flavor Production and Spectroscopy with CDF · PDF fileCdf2Logo Heavy Flavor Production...
Transcript of Heavy Flavor Production and Spectroscopy with CDF · PDF fileCdf2Logo Heavy Flavor Production...
Cdf2Logo
Heavy Flavor Production and Spectroscopy withCDF
Prabhakar Palni(On behalf of the CDF Collaboration)
Department of Physics & Astronomy,University of New Mexico, USA
BEACH 2012Wichita, Kansas, 23-28 July, 2012
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 1 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Outline
Outline of the talk
The Tevatron and the CDF II DetectorConfirmation of the Bottom Baryon Resonancestate ⇤⇤0
b
Probing Quark FragmentationUpsilon Spin Alignment
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 2 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Experimental Setup The Tevatron Accelerator
Statistics
The Tevatron collided p withp at 1.96TeV center of massenergy from 2001-2011Instantaneous Luminosity4x1032
cm
�2s
�1RL dt ' 12.0 fb�1 deliveredRL dt ' 10.0 fb�1 on tape,accessible for CDF II
store number1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000
2000
4000
6000
8000
01/1101/1001/0901/0801/0701/0601/0501/0401/03
DeliveredAcquired
)-1Luminosity (pb
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 3 / 43
Cdf2Logo
CDF Detector CDF Detector and Particle Tracking
CDF Detector
CDF detector
Front End ElectronicsTriggers / DAQ (pipeline)Online & Offline Software
SiliconMicrostripTracker
Time-of-Flight
Drift ChamberCOT
Plug Calor. Muon
OldNew
PartiallyNew
Muon System
Solenoid
Central Calor.
Fwd Calor.
Fill gaps
Silicon Vertex Detector, Drift Chamber and TOF detectorB=1.4T and 1.5� separation between kaon andpion from TOF + dE/dX
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 4 / 43
Cdf2Logo
CDF Detector CDF Detector and Particle Tracking
Confirmation of the BottomBaryon Resonance State ⇤⇤0
b
CDF Public Note 10900
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 5 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Motivation
Heavy hadrons are the "helium atoms of QCD" where the nucleus is theheavy quark Q and the two orbiting electrons are the light diquark qq
Measurements of the masses and widths of the heavy baryons provideinput to test different non-perturbative QCD approaches to thespectroscopy of bottom hadron statesFor example: Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET) and Lattice QCD
⇤⇤0b
is a resonance state containing the quarks b, u, and d. LHCb hasrecently observed this state with a signal significance greater than5�(arXiv:1205:3452[hep-ex])
Goal of the analysis: Search for the ⇤⇤0b
resonant state through itsdecay to ⇤0
b
⇡+⇡�
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 6 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Resonant States Decaying into ⇤0b
Singlet
antisymmb[qq] symmb{qq}
2G
eV/c
+1/2b!
-1/2
-3/2+ 1/2"
-1*b!
-0#
-0#
-0#
-0#
+ 1/2"+0
b$2
+1
*b$2
+3
# #
p-wave
+ 1/2"+1
I=0 I=1
Pion Transitions
⇤⇤0b
, Orbital excitations:J
P = (1/2)�and (3/2)�(Strong decay)⇤0
b
, Singlet state:J
P = (1/2)+(Weak-decay)pions ⇡+⇡� are soft andemitted in p-wave
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 7 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Decay Chain of ⇤⇤0b
p
p-soft
!
+soft!
0b"
-b
!
+!
-K
p
+c"
|0
|d
P.V.
*0b"
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 8 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Masses and Q-values of ⇤⇤0b
Resonance States
Q ⌘ M(⇤⇤0b
! ⇤0b
⇡+⇡�) - M(⇤0b
) - 2m(⇡±)i.e the amount of energy released by the decay reaction
Various theoretical models predict that the mass of the first excited state⇤⇤0
b
, (1/2)� lies very close to the hadronic three-body mode thresholdwith Q⌘[20...47] MeV/c
2
The higher excited state, ⇤⇤0b
(3/2)�has Q⌘[2...17] MeV/c
2 higher thanthe lower state.
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 9 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Two Displaced Track Trigger
b-Triggers at @1.96 TeVEnormous inelastic total cross-section of �inel
tot ⇠ 60 mb�b ⇡ 20µb (|⌘| < 1.0),@1.96 TeV
Trigger on Hadronic Modes:CDF Two Track Trigger
Exploit long c⌧ (b-hadrons)Trigger on � 2 tracks withlarge |d0|p
T
� 2 GeV/c
(b production in pp )
|d0| Resolution � beam-line = 47µm
-600 -400 -200 0 200 400 6000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
m)µ (0SVT d
25≤ SVT2χ 2 GeV/c; ≥tP
mµ = 47 dσ
mµ
trac
ks p
er 1
0
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 10 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Signal Model
We reconstruct ⇤⇤0b
candidates in the mass difference spectrum: Q-value
Q = M(⇤⇤0b
! ⇤0b
⇡+⇡�) - M(⇤0b
) - 2m(⇡±PDG
)
Mass resolution of ⇤0b
and most of the systematic uncertainties cancelleaving only the ⇡+
soft
⇡�soft
contribution.
The signal is described by a double Gaussian to model detectorresolution.
Signal shape is fixed from the MC sample.
The background is described by a second order Chebyshev polynomial.
Q-value spectrum is obtained using full, Signal + Background model.
Used high statistics CDF D
⇤+ ! D
0⇡+soft
sample to gauge the soft pionmomentum scale for ⇤⇤0
b
soft pion candidates.
Scale is adjusted by: Q(⇤⇤0b
) = Q(⇤⇤0b
)� 0.28 MeV/c2
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 11 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Analysis Criteria
Exploit long life time andlarge mass of ⇤0
b
p
T
(⇤0b
) > 9.0 GeV/c
(Large)
c⌧(⇤0b
)/�c⌧ > 6.0
p
T
(⇡�b
) > 1 GeV/c
p
T
(⇡±soft
) > 0.2 GeV/c
|d0/�d0 |(⇡±soft
) < 3.0,w.r.t. primary VX.
]2) [GeV/cb-
! +c"Mass(
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4
2ca
nd
ida
tes p
er
20
Me
V/c
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000CDF Run II Preliminary
-1 10.0 fb#L
15418 cands.#) 0b"N(
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 12 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Q-value spectrum of ⇤⇤0b
]2) [GeV/c+s!
-s!
0b
"# *0b"(rawQ
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07
2C
andid
ate
s p
er 1
.5 M
eV
/c
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
CDF Run II Preliminary-1 10.0 fb$L The projection of the unbinned
maximum LH fit onto the binnedQ-value raw distribution of ⇤⇤0
b
candidates
Number of signal events= 17+5.3
�4.6
Q(⇤⇤0b
) = 20.68 ± 0.35MeV/c2 , Q-value scaleadjustment applied.
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 13 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Significance of the Signal
Local Significance EstimateBased on Exp. Data Fits
Signal + Background,H1(Signal Hypothesis).Background only,H0(NullHypothesis).D= �2⇤lnL1
L0= �2 ⇤ 4(lnL)
p-value is 2.28 ⇤ 10�6
Significance of the signal is4.6�
Significance Estimated with toyMC expts.
Generate Null Hypothesis H0 ,fit with H1
Parameter of interest , N
cands
Signal position Q left floatingwithin [6,50] MeV/c
2 searchwindowSignal shape fixedBackground shape floatingp-value = 2.3 ⇤ 10�4 or 3.5�
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 14 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Systematic Uncertainties on Q-value
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 15 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Confirmation of ⇤⇤0b
Summary of Results
To determine the absolute mass of the ⇤⇤0b
M (⇤0b
) = 5619.7 ± 1.2(stat)± 1.2(syst) MeV/c2
Measured Properties of the ⇤⇤0b
forRL dt ' 10.0 fb�1
CDF Public Note 10900
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 16 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Probing QuarkFragmentation
CDF Public Note 10704
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 17 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Quark Fragmentation
Quark fragmentation models, stringand cluster fragmentationD mesons offer solid and data basedtechnique to validate these modelsStudy charged particle productionaround heavy quarks
Kaons near D
s
and D
+ bothdecaying to �⇡Similar technique used by B
s
flavorD used for fragmentation studies
No known resonances decay toD
s
KCharged D’s do not mixSelect prompt D’s to minimizecontamination from B–>DX decays
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 18 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Probing Fragmentation
Charge Correlationbetween D and K
For D
+s
:Opposite sign ) earlyin fragmentation chainSame sign ) late infragmentation chain
For D
+:Random chargecorrelation
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 19 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Methodology-1CDF Run II preliminary - 360 pb
)2) (GeV/c+!-
K+
m(K1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2
2E
ntr
ies p
er 2
MeV
/c
0
10
20
30
40
50310"
+!# $s+D
+!# $+D
+!-!+
K$+
D
background
Prompt D
±s
/D
± mesons have ideally zero IP compared to finite IPof secondary components.
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 20 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Methodology
Particle Identification TechniquesSpecific ionization per unit track length (dE/dX) in COTTime of Flight (TOF) of the particle measured in TOF sub-detector
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 21 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Kaon Fraction Compared with Pythia and Herwig
Measure kaon fraction with likelihood fitTake maximum p
T
tracks in 4 R=0.7 cone around D candidates
Kaon production around prompt D
±s
is enhanced compared toprompt D
± in the opposite sign combinationPrabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 22 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Quark Fragmentation
Kaon Fraction Compared with Pythia and Herwig
Kaon production in the same sign combination is similar aroundprompt D
±s
and prompt D
±
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 23 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Upsilon Spin AlignmentPhys. Rev. Lett. 108, 151802 (2012)
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 24 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Upsilon spin-alignment
Discrepancies in previous Upsilon spin alignment study
Differences between CDF and D0 results (⌥ polarized?)Measurement of spin alignment in s-channel helicity frame only
Angular distribution of muons from ⌥ decays
Previous experiments have only measured �✓
Does not allow to calculate rotationally invariant quantitiesBias could be introduced for non-uniform detector acceptance in �
This measurement is the first that determines the full 3D angulardistribution
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 25 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Invariant Mass Distribution of Dimuon events
550k ⌥ (1S), 150k ⌥ (2S), 76k⌥ (3S) decaying into µ+µ�
Background is dominated bymuons from b-decaysB enriched sample fromdisplaced muons is used tomodel the angular distributionof the backgroundObtain geometric acceptancefrom MC sampleCombined momentumresolution is �
p
t
/p2t
⇠ 0.07%)2) (GeV/c-µ
+µm(
8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5
2E
ntr
ies p
er 1
0 M
eV
/c
0
10
20
30
40
50310!
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 26 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Results
First measurement of ⌥ (3S) parametersNone of the 3 states shows evidence of polarizationVerified with frame invariance crosschecks
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 27 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Results
One-sigma confidence intervals for �✓ and �' for the ⌥ (3S) state
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 28 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Comparison of rotationally invariant quantity, �̃
Rotationally invariant quantity �̃ in CS and SH frame�̃ = �✓+3�'
1��'
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 29 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Results
Comparison of �✓,�' and �✓' as a function of p
T
for ⌥ (1S) state
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 30 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Results
Comparison of �✓,�' and �✓' as a function of p
T
for ⌥ (2S) state
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 31 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Results
Comparison of �✓,�' and �✓' as a function of p
T
for ⌥ (3S) state
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 32 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Upsilon Spin Alignment
Comparison with Theoretical Models
Comparison of ↵ ⌘ �✓ for ⌥ (1S) decays in the SH frameNewer theoretical calculations have larger uncertainties
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 33 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Conclusions
Summary and Conclusions
The ⇤⇤0b
resonance is observed by the CDF at Q(⇤⇤0b
) = 20.68 ± 0.35MeV/c2 with the significance of the signal 3.5� and the local signalsignificance of 4.6�
Confirms one of the states recently observed by the LHCb Collaboration
For opposite sign charge combination: kaon production around promptD
±s
is enhanced compared to production around prompt D
±
MCs are consistent in describing early production of kaons, butdescription of kaon production later in the fragmentation is inadequate
First 3D measurement of ⌥ (3S) parameters
No significant evidence of polarization for ⌥ (nS) over a wide range of p
T
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 34 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 35 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 36 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
⌃±⇤ in CDF: PRD 85, 092011 (2012)
]2) [GeV/c!) - m(b
") - M(!b
") = M(!b
"# b$Q(
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21
2ca
nd
ida
tes p
er 3
Me
V/c
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
-
b$
-1 6.0 fb%L
DataSignal + BackgroundBackground only
]2) [GeV/c!) - m(b
") - M(!b
") = M(!b
"# b$Q(
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21
2ca
nd
ida
tes p
er 3
Me
V/c
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350+
b$
-1 6.0 fb%L
DataSignal + BackgroundBackground only
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 37 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
Results
!cos 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Entri
es p
er 0
.05
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
163
10"
(a)
(deg)#0 30 60 90 120 150 180
oEn
tries
per
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
63
10"
(b)
!cos 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Entri
es p
er 0
.05
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
83
10"
(c)
(deg)#0 30 60 90 120 150 180
oEn
tries
per
5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
83
10"
(d)
Projections of angular variables measured in the CS and the SHframes for the range of invariant mass containing the ⌥ (1S) signal
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 38 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
Results
!cos 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Entrie
s per
0.05
0
0.5
1
1.5
2310"
= 0.47KSP
(a) 2)<8.7 GeV/c-µ+µ8.5<m(
!cos 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Entrie
s per
0.05
0
0.5
1
1.5
2310"
= 0.62KSP
(b) 2)<11.4 GeV/c-µ+µ11.1<m(
(deg)#0 30 60 90 120 150 180
oEn
tries p
er 5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4310"
= 0.14KSP
(c) 2)<8.7 GeV/c-µ+µ8.5<m(
(deg)#0 30 60 90 120 150 180
oEn
tries p
er 5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1310"
= 0.23KSP
(d) 2)<11.4 GeV/c-µ+µ11.1<m(
Comparisons of projected angular distributions measured in theCS frame for prompt and displaced (error bars) dimuon samples inthe low-mass and high-mass sidebands
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 39 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
Systematic Uncertainties
Momentum Scale: B field knowledge, uncertainty due to detectormaterial on the dE/dx correction.
Detector resolution model and its parameters.(Detector resolution is a critical parameter for our measurementsespecially for the fits of natural widths)
Choice of the background model.
Systematics propagated from the previous CDF measurement of the ⇤0b
mass.
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 40 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
Theoretical Predictions of Masses and Q-valueReferences M(⇤0
b
) M(⇤⇤0b
, 1/2�) Q M(⇤⇤0b
, 3/2�) Q
MeV/c
2 MeV/c
2 MeV/c
2 MeV/c
2 MeV/c
2
Capstick [1] 5585 5912 47 5920 55Karliner [2] 5619.7 5929 29 5940 40Roberts [3] 5612 5939 47 5941 49Garcilazo [4] 5625 5890 �15 5890 -15Faustov [5] 5622 5930 28 5947 45Zhang [6] 5690 5850 �120 5900 -70Aziza B. [7] 5619.7 5920 20 5920 20
Q ⌘ M(⇤⇤0b
! ⇤0b
⇡+⇡�) - M(⇤0b
) - 2m(⇡±PDG
)
The predicted masses for the first excited state lie very close to thehadronic three-body mode threshold with Q⌘[20...47] MeV/c
2 and for itshigher excited state with only Q⌘[2...17] MeV/c
2 higher.
[1]S. Capstick, et al. Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986) [2]M. Karliner,et al, arXiv:0708.4027. [3]W. Roberts et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23, 2817 (2008) [4]H. Garcilazo,et al. J. Phys. G 34, 961 (2007) [5]D. Ebert, et al. Phys. Rev. D 72, 034026 (2005) [6]J. R. Zhang,
et al. Phys. Rev. D 78, 094015 (2008) [7]Z. Aziza Baccouche et al. Nucl. Phys. A 696, 638 (2001)
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 41 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
References to the Predictions of Masses and Q-value
[1]S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986).
[2]M. Karliner, B. Keren-Zur, H. J. Lipkin and J. L. Rosner,arXiv:0708.4027 [hep-ph].
[3]W. Roberts and M. Pervin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23, 2817 (2008)[arXiv:0711.2492 [nucl-th]].
[4]H. Garcilazo, J. Vijande and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 34, 961(2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0703257].
[5]D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D 72,034026 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0504112].
[6]J. R. Zhang and M. Q. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 78, 094015 (2008)[arXiv:0811.3266 [hep-ph]].
[7]C. K. Chow and T. D. Cohen, Nucl. Phys. A 688, 842 (2001)[arXiv:hep-ph/0003131].
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 42 / 43
Cdf2Logo
Backup slides
The Tevatron Accelerator at Fermilab near Chicago
Prabhakar Palni (University of New Mexico) Heavy Flavor Spectroscopy with CDF BEACH 2012 43 / 43