Heartbeat – Dec 2003 AHA 2003 AHA 2003: Tackling LDL and HDL for atheroma regression Valentin...
-
Upload
edgar-hopkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
1
Transcript of Heartbeat – Dec 2003 AHA 2003 AHA 2003: Tackling LDL and HDL for atheroma regression Valentin...
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
AHA 2003: Tackling LDL and HDL for atheroma regression
Valentin Fuster MDDirector, Cardiovascular InstituteMount Sinai Medical CenterNew York, NY
Steve Nissen MDProfessor of MedicineCleveland Clinic FoundationCleveland, OH
Scott Grundy MDDirector, Center for Human NutritionUT Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TX
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSALEffects of atorvastatin vs
pravastatin on atherosclerosis progression
ApoA-1 Milano Effect of an HDL mimic on
atherosclerosis progression
Topics
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Design
•654 patients randomized at 24 US centers, with indication for atherosclerotic disease, stenosis of >20%, and LDL levels between 125 and 210 mg/dL
• Intensive atorvastatin (80 mg daily) vs moderate pravastatin (40 mg daily) therapy
•Primary end point: percent change in coronary plaque volume, as measured by IVUS between baseline and 18 months
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Outcome Pravastatin (n=249)
Atorvastatin (n=253)
p
Final LDL level
110 79 <0.001
% change in atheroma volume
+2.7(progression)
-0.4(no change)
0.02
REVERSAL: Results
AHA 2003
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Type of statin
Pravastatin:
•40 mg/day is the highest dose approved by the FDA
•This was not the ideal dose to use to compare effects on the lipid profile
Why did you not compare two different dosages ofatorvastatin?
Fuster
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Lowering LDL
Nissen
Question: Does lowering LDL below target levels have a measurable effect on atherosclerosis progression rate?
Objective in REVERSAL: Group 1 with LDL around 100, group 2 with much lower LDL levels
"It was really designed as an 'is-lower-better?' trial."
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: How low?
ATP III guidelines:Levels of LDL should be below 100
TNT, SEARCH, IDEALAddress the issue of how low to go
REVERSALFirst study to test this question
"The results, in my opinion, look very promising."
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Surprised
• In the pravastatin group, 176 patients had LDL <100, with a mean LDL of 88
•They still showed highly significant progression
•Different progression rates for every LDL level between groups
"We were very surprised by this outcome."
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
AHA 2003
25
46
18
34
0.05.0
10.015.020.025.030.035.040.045.050.0
Reducti
on (
%)
Reduction in LDL Reduction in totalcholesterol
Pravastatin Atorvastatin
REVERSAL: Cholesterol reduction
p<0.0001p<0.0001
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Baseline LDL: 150
•Slightly higher than normal (135-140)
•Average LDL reductions of 30% were right on target
"Those results were totally predictable."
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Adverse events
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Even
ts
Death MI Stroke
Pravastatin Atorvastatin
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: IVUS
Plaque volume measured by IVUS showed high person-to-person variability.How accurate is this technique?
Fuster
It's not so much the technique, but the biology of the disease• Incredibly dynamic•Patients with large increases, others
with decreases in atheroma volume Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
End point Pravastatin Atorvastatin p
% change in atheroma volume
+2.7 -0.4 0.2
Change in total atheroma volume
+4.4 -0.9 0.02
Change in % obstructive volume
1.6 0.2 0.0002
REVERSAL: End points
AHA 2003
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Impact
Despite the significant results, the impact was very small, with only 18 months of follow-up
Fuster
Angiographic trials: Small plaque changes did correlate with changes in clinical end points
IVUS: It is not known whether small changes can predict clinical events
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Plaque changes
Perhaps other changes in the plaqueoccurred, which IVUS was unable to detect
•Changes in plaque composition
Fuster
Plaque composition cannot easily be measured by IVUS
The study showed a huge range of changes, with a 40% to 50% decrease in some patients
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
AHA 2003
3.4
0.6
1.9
0.2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Ch
an
ge in
%
ath
ero
ma v
olu
me
Patients withdiabetes
Patients withmetabolic syndrome
Pravastatin Atorvastatin
REVERSAL: Subgroups
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Diabetics
Patients with diabetes 95Patients with metabolic 204
syndrome
Most important change in percentage of atheroma in diabetic patients
•Multivariate analysis to
understand the drivers of progression vs regression
•Diabetics have more inherent underlying progression and need more aggressive treatment
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Pravastatin
"I was pretty surprised at how poorly the pravastatin group did."
•Progression in patients in all 22 prespecified subgroups
•More intensively treated patients had all the advantages
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL: Waiting for definite answers
Dose of pravastatin never increased
Fuster
•Only about 3% additional LDL lowering with 80-mg pravastatin
"This was not an events trial."
We will know more when TNT, SEARCH, and IDEAL will come out
"REVERSAL tells us what we're likely to see."
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL summary: Fuster
"Very good news."
•We have a strategy that prevents progression, at least for 18 months
•Minimal changes, but over a short time period
"I wonder if over a period of a few years this will be very significant."
Fuster
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL summary: Grundy
Aggressive LDL lowering, well below 100
"My guess: the lower the better for LDL."
Some questions remain unanswered, but an important first step
NCEP will evaluate existing trials and issue an updated ATP III in the next six months
At completion of all new trials there will be an ATP IV Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
REVERSAL summary: Nissen
Nissen
Progression rate
•3% difference between pravastatin and atorvastatin arms
"These are not small differences, they are actually large differences that over a period of years will translate into important differences in morbidity and mortality."
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Effect of recombinant ApoA-1 Milano
on atherosclerosis in ACS patients
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Background
Pilot trial of recombinant apolipoprotein A-1 Milano on atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes
•Little has been done to prove that raising HDL reduces CAD risk
•People in a small Italian village, with low HDL and low CAD rates, carry ApoA-1 variant: ApoA-1 Milano
•Esperion Therapeutics developed agent ETC-216
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Design
•57 patients with ACS randomized to two doses of ETC-216 (15 mg/kg or 45 mg/kg) or placebo
• IVUS to assess changes in atheroma within two weeks of ACS diagnosis and after five weeks of ApoA-1 Milano treatment
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Outcome Combined ETC-216 groups
Placebo
Mean change in atheroma volume (%)
-1.06 +0.14
Mean change in total atheroma volume (mm3)
-14.1 -2.9
Mean change in maximum atheroma thickness (mm)
-0.042 -0.008
ApoA-1 Milano: Results
AHA 2003
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Conclusions
•Some regression of atherosclerosis after five weeks of ETC-216 infusion
"Very fascinating"
HDL may halt the progression of atherosclerotic disease by helping the artery to get rid of the excess oxidized LDL
Fuster
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: The HDL question
REVERSAL"Putting icing on a cake that we already have."
"This work is pioneering, because it will get into the HDL question."
•HDL known to be associated with CAD
•Prevention of atherosclerosis by affecting HDL has been
questioned Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: End points
Different calculations of the primary end point in the two trials
Agent % change in total atheroma volume
Pravastatin +2.7
Atorvastatin -0.4
ApoA-1 Milano -4.2
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Drastic changes
"Effectively, we saw the elimination of a couple of years' worth of progression."
"We were just shocked when the statisticians delivered the data."
•Large changes in big fatty plaques
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Mechanism
HDL may halt the progression of atherosclerotic disease
ApoA-1 Milano: •Elimination of excess of oxidized
LDL by macrophages• Elimination of macrophages
Fuster
Injection of human HDL into rabbits
Disappearance of the macrophage after four
weeks
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Effects of HDL
Many mechanisms for HDL
•Reversal of cholesterol transport
•Anti-inflammatory agent
• Interference with atherogenic lipoproteins
Study does not differentiate between these mechanisms
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Effects of HDL
Why was the HDL low in the Italian village population?
How does ApoA-1 Milano work?
•Cleared more rapidly from the circulation
•Lower production rate
•Less ApoA-1 getting out
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Combination
Catabolism is certainly higher
Would we have seen the same with wild-type ApoA-1?
Animal experiments with ApoA-1 Milano
by PK Shah
• Nothing worked as well as the combination of ApoA-1 Milano and phospholipid
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Statins and raising HDL
REVERSAL•Basic mechanisms of
progression/regression with statin therapy
•Effect on inflammatory processes with CRP
ApoA-1 Milano•Therapeutically raising HDL•Even with few patients, images
show that you've accomplished something
Fuster
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Clinical trials
What could be a feasible strategy in a clinical study to raise HDL?
•Early intervention in ACS patients might show immediate benefit in terms of reducing recurrent events
•Takes a while for the statins to take hold
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Type of agent
What type of agent to use in clinical trials?
•ApoA-1 derivative that could be produced in large amounts
•Right now such an agent cannot be extracted from humans
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: The future
The manufacturing process of ApoA-1 Milano has come a long way
"We can make enough of this to do large-scale clinical trials."
•5000-patient post-MI ACS study looking at morbidity and mortality under discussion
•Phase 3 trial with the CETP inhibitor torcetrapib launched
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
ApoA-1 Milano: Added to statin therapy
The agent would have to be given on top of a statin
Grundy
REVERSALWe can do active-controlled trials with positive results
"If one statin can produce greater benefits than another statin, a statin plus agent x has a very good chance of beating a statin alone."
Nissen
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Final word: Fuster
REVERSAL
• Lowering lipids as much as possible, even below normal, is important
•Anti-inflammatory/antithrombotic aspects of statins
ApoA1-Milano
•HDL as a defense mechanism
• Increasing the activity of LDL Fuster
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Final word: Grundy
Statins can reduce CAD risk by one third, which leaves two thirds of people going to get into trouble
"These two studies are telling us that we may be able to shut down the plaques."
•Reducing the frequency of syndromes, by further lowering LDL and activating the HDL system
Grundy
Heartbeat – Dec 2003
AHA 2003
Final word: Nissen
A future of intensive LDL reduction, along with activation of the HDL pathways
If we hit LDL and HDL hard, we can get beyond an event reduction of 30% to 35%
Next phase: using agents together will result in a 50% to 70% mortality reduction
"We will treat this disorder with a cocktail of drugs, much like they treat tuberculosis or HIV."
Nissen