Healthcare Reform PPACA Overview
-
Upload
benefitmall -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
8.694 -
download
2
Transcript of Healthcare Reform PPACA Overview
Healthcare Reform Webinar Discussion for BenefitMall Brokers
Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:00 a.m. EST
Listen to the audio portion of the webinar here.
Meet the PanelRob SchlossbergExecutive Director of Sales
Randy MadryBenefitMall Consultant
Garry Carneal, JD, MABenefitMall Consultant
Moderators
Speaker Speaker
Meet The PanelAri Friedman
Executive Director of Sales
Webinar Overview
Attendees will learn about
Part I: PPACA Background
Part II: Key points of Supreme
Court’s ruling on PPACA
Part III: How will brokers and their
clients be impacted and
what can employers do to prepare for the
future?
Part IV: PPACA Reflection Points
Part I:PPACA Background
PPACA Background
• The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010
• Technical amendments were made through the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, signed March 30, 2010
• Various portions of the law began being implemented in 2010 and will continue until 2018. Many key changes will occur in 2014.
• Federal and state governments are largely implementing these provisions
• Several federal agencies are assuming pivotal roles• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services • U.S. Department of Labor• U.S Department of Treasury
National Health Expenditure Projections by Payer, 2010-2019
PPACA Goals
Covering uninsured and underinsured populations
Improving the transparency and ease of purchasing health insurance
Increasing health plan/insurer accountability
Creating national standards
Standardizing benefit packages
Reducing medical and insurance costs
But how successful will PPACA be in achieving these goals?
Individual Mandate
Picture Credit: Texas Enterprise ; Univ of Texas at Austin
With a few exceptions,
everyone must participate in
the new health care reform
system
Most employers also must
participate, either through
offering coverage or by
paying a penalty
The Individual Mandate is an integral part of
PPACA to ensure full
participation by all U.S. citizens, unless they are
exempted.
In theory, this will help spread
the risk and make sure everyone is
participating in the insurance
system.
Effective January 1, 2014
Exceptions to the Individual Mandate
Applies to everyone except the following:
• Who already have minimum essential coverage through an employer-
sponsored plan
• Who have individual qualified coverage
• Who are enrolled in a Medicaid or Medicare program
• Who are covered by a military plan
• Who are dependents of active military enrolled in a TriCare plan
• Who are permanently incarcerated
Additional Exceptions to the Individual Mandate
Other exceptions include persons:
• Who are members of Indian tribes
• Who express religious objection
• Who are without coverage for less than three months
• Who would be contributing more than eight percent of their household
income as a “required contribution,”
• Whom the Secretary of HHS determines that obtaining coverage would
constitute an extreme hardship
Repeal Efforts Not Successful To Date
Most recent effort occurred in the US House of Representatives
on July 11th
The vote followed party lines with 244
members voting to repeal PPACA
in its entirety
There have been 32 efforts to
repeal or defund various portions of PPACA to date
Some programs associated with PPACA are not funded and will
need an affirmative action by Congress
Part II: Key points of Supreme Court’s ruling on PPACA
U.S. Supreme Court - PPACA Legal Issues
• The Question of Legal Standing and the Applicability of the Anti-
Injunction Act• The Constitutionality of the
Individual Mandate• The Missing Severability Clause
• The Medicaid Expansion Provisions
Four Key Legal Issues
Supreme Court Ruling
The Court found that jurisdiction and timing was proper, and rejected the argument that the Anti-Injunction Act prohibited the case from being heard
The Court found that the Commerce Clause does not grant Congress the authority to regulate inactivity, but that the Individual Mandate is constitutional under Congress’s ability to levy and collect taxes.
Court noted that the missing Severability Clause was not relevant to this case.
The Court upheld most of the Medicaid Expansion Provisions but narrowed the financial obligations of the state
Part III: How will brokers and
their clients be impacted and what can
employers do to prepare for the future?
What should brokers and their clients do to prepare for the future?
With the PPACA moving forward including the individual mandate, brokers should help their clients prepare for future changes to the health care system. To make an informed choices, six key elements will be discussed:
• Exchange concept (both state-based and federally-facilitated)
• Qualified Health Plans and other insurance arrangements
• Essential Health Benefits (EHB)
• Summary of Benefit and Coverage
• Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) impact
• Tax implications and penalties
Exchange Functions
• Purchasing cooperative that promotes transparency
• Qualified health plan certification• Standardizing benefit offerings (including
essential health benefit requirements and gold/silver/bronze levels)
•Consumer website/On-line enrollment portal• Operate or supervise electronic enrollment
process• Vehicle for premium subsidies - Who is
eligible and how much is it worth?
Primary Function
s
Exchange Overview
Exchange Configurations• State standalone Exchange(s) (Individual and/or SHOP)
• State & Federal Partnership Exchange• Default to Federally-run Exchange
State-Based Exchanges
• Individual/Non-Group• Small Business Health Options Program
(SHOP)• As of October 1, 2013, Small group employers with fewer than
101 employees will be able to access health insurance through the SHOP exchange.
• The SHOP exchange is designed to attempt to arrange employee health insurance for small employers on terms similar to those that large employers enjoy.
• The SHOP exchange will only sell benefit plans that conform to a consistent format
• On January 1, 2014, state health insurance SHOP exchanges may be able to expand eligibility to large employers with more than 100 FTEs.
• Blended model• State Exchanges must be certified and operational by October
1, 2013
State Exchange Updates
• Implementing a State-Based Exchange: 16 States that are
moving forward with Exchanges are California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Hawaii, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York,
Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Utah, West Virginia,
Washington (and the District of Columbia)
• State-Based Exchange Legislation Pending: 2 States with
pending Exchange legislation include Illinois, and Pennsylvania.
• Not Implementing a State-Based Exchange: 10 States not
moving forward with Exchanges are Alaska, Florida, Louisiana, Maine,
Michigan, New Hampshire, Ohio, South Carolina Texas, Wisconsin
• Leaning Towards/Not Moving Forward: 22 other states are
leaning toward opting out of broad health care reform or waiting for a
federal exchange.
Federally-Facilitated Exchanges
• PPACA establishes a federal exchange system along with the
state exchanges
• Should a state fail to implement a state-based Exchange,
even if by choice, the federal government will implement a
federally-facilitated Exchange
• The State can maintain some control over this type of
Exchange
• Funding for this type of Exchange is still lacking
• How many states are likely default to the federal exchanges?
Exchange Challenges
PPACA timeframe - only about one year
to become operational
Setting up the governance and
operational infrastructure, including
the IT platforms
Promoting efficiency and flexibility while keeping costs for participants down (e.g., for small
businesses and individuals)
Avoiding adverse selection by pooling a mix of the healthy and the unhealthy
Becoming financially self-
sustaining
Complying with PPACA standards for public
accountability, transparency, and
reporting
Qualified Health Plans
• Both Brokers and Employers must understand PPACA authorized health plan offerings
• A “qualified health plan” is a health plan that:
• Is certified by each Exchange through which it is offered
• Provides the essential benefits package
• Is offered by an issuer that is:
• Licensed and in good standing in each state in which it is offered
• Agrees to offer at least one silver plan and one gold plan
• Agrees to charge the same premium whether the plan is sold through the Exchange or outside the Exchange
• Complies with other requirements of the Secretary of HHS and the Exchange
Source: NAIC
Other Health Plans
• Grandfathered Health Plans
• Allows existing benefit designs and participation rules to be maintained for a period of time
• Self-funded Health Plans and Union Plans have some exemptions under PPACA. They are not required to:
• provide coverage with minimum essential benefits• participate in a risk-adjustment system• comply with the MLR requirements and review of premium increases
• Accountable Care Organization (ACO)
• Providing coordinated high quality care to Medicare patients• Agree to take responsibility for the care of patients in exchange for the
opportunity to share in the total savings - $940 million over 4 years
Essential Health Benefits
Beginning in 2014, PPACA requires health insurance plans offered to individuals and small businesses to include health benefit services in each of ten categories, called essential health benefits (EHBs).
• HHS has established a rule that allows state regulators several options to define their state’s EHBs. State regulators may choose any of the following:
• One of the three largest small group plans in the state by enrollment • One of the three largest state employee health plans by enrollment
• One of the three largest federal employee health plan options by enrollment, or • The largest health maintenance organization (HMO) plan offered.
Policy Goal: "It is important to find a successful balance between providing affordable coverage while establishing a reasonable level of benefit protection. If we continue to increase the cost by mandating a comprehensive set of essential benefits, we place further unwanted burdens on the business owner and their employees."
Sec. 1302. Essential Health Benefits Requirements
• (A) Ambulatory patient services.• (B) Emergency services.
• (C) Hospitalization.• (D) Maternity and newborn care.
• (E) Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health
treatment.• (F) Prescription drugs.
• (G) Rehabilitative and Rehabilitative services and devices.
• (H) Laboratory services.• (I) Preventive and Wellness services and
Chronic Disease Management.• (J) Pediatric services, including oral and vision
care
PPACA Sec. 1302(b)(1) services covered
include:
EHB Issues that Employers and Brokers Should Thinking About
Embracing state flexibility especially for multi-state employers
Customizing EHB standard packages for each state
Keeping EHB levels affordable
Addressing variability in mandated benefits at state level
Understanding additional variations in benefit designs
Defining Medical Necessity when interpreting applicability of EHBs
How will EHBs be addressed in Federally-Facilitated Exchanges
Summary of Benefits and Coverage
Effective September 23, 2012, insurers and group benefit plans
must issue a standardized Summary of Benefits and Coverage
(SBC)
SBC should detail “in plain language, simple and consistent information about health plan
benefits and coverage that…will help consumers better understand the coverage
they have, and, for the first time, allow them to easily compare different coverage options.”
NAIC provided recommendations that were adopted by the federal government
Summary of Benefits and CoverageShould include
coverage examples
that illustrate benefits provided under the
plan or coverage, detail out-of-pocket
costs, provide
examples of
coverage for a
simple delivery
and a Type II diabetic care, and explain
any coverage exclusions
for common benefits
Person requesting
an SBC must be provided with the
document within
seven (7) business
days
Upon renewal, must be provided to both
participants and
beneficiaries as part
of any written
enrollment applicatio
n materials
Experts differ as to
when updated
SBCs need to be
issued – after
September 23 or
after new policy
year (?)
MLR in a Nutshell
• Beginning in 2011, insurers had to spend and track MLR ratios• Large Group (defined as 100 or more Employees)
• 85% clinical services and qualified quality programs• 15% administrative
• Small Group (defined as 2 to 100 Employees) and nongroup • 80% clinical services and qualified quality programs (NY 82%)• 20% administrative (NY 18%)
• Calculations are based by legal entity, state and line of business• MLR reports filed to HHS June 1st each year• Rebate checks for 2011 have been issued in 2012• If a health plan or insurer meets or exceeds the MLR, notices will be issued
with the first plan document after July 1, 2012• If 80/85% percentage not achieved, notices and rebate checks must be
distributed by August 1st the following year• Three month requirement from August 1 to take action on the MLR rebate
options
Employer MLR Distribution Rebate OptionsDOL Technical 2011-04 Release
• Distribute rebates to current (and, if desired, former) participants
• Enhance benefits provided to plan participants by additional benefits or
wellness programs• Pay reasonable plan expenses
•Reduce future premiums for current plan participants
• Note: For the purposes of MLR rebate checks, COBRA plan participants are
considered plan participants.
Based upon already
established ERISA
principles, the DOL guidance
provides employers with four options. An employer
may:
MLR Impact: Kaiser Foundation Study
Refund: MLR rebate checks this year estimated $1.3 billion Non-Group Market: Rebates are expected to go to almost
one-third (31%) of consumers in the individual market. The share of consumers in the individual insurance market
expected to receive rebates ranges from near zero in several states to as high as 86% in Oklahoma and 92% in Texas
Group Market: About one-quarter (28%) of the small group market and 19% of the large group market is projected to receive rebates.
Amount: Checks could range from an average of $72 for those with insurance through a large employer to an average of $127 for those who bought individual policies
Individual Mandate: What are the tax penalties for non-compliance?
The applicable flat dollar amount for 2014 for a tax filer with no dependents will be $95 and the amount for 2015 will increase to $325. This amount will increase over the years, rising to $695 in 2016, and will be further revised in 2017 according to the changes in cost-of-living.
Each adult will pay the rate of an individual, and then you need to add the dependent at the 50% rate. For example, in 2016 a couple with one child under 18 would be assessed a flat dollar penalty of $1,737.50 (two adults x $695 plus one child at $347.50 -- one half of adult penalty).
A family of four (one couple with two children over 18) would only be required to pay the 300% cap in 2016. Three hundred percent of the $695 flat amount for 2016 is equal to $2,085. This amount is less than the flat amount that could be charged if the cap were not in place (two adults + two children over 18 = $695 x 4 = $2,780).
Small Employer Tax Credits
Under PPACA, small employers offering health insurance
coverage to employees enjoy several benefits, including a new
income tax credit
Eligible small employers are defined as those
employing 25 or fewer full-time equivalent
employees with average annual wages of less than $50,000 and contributing to employees’ qualified health care coverage a uniform percentage, no less than 50%, of the
premium cost
Large Employer Tax Penalties
Under PPACA, a premium subsidy program is NOT established for a
large employer. In fact, a tax penalty may be assessed against a large
employer
Large employers MUST offer medical coverage to its full-
time employees beginning in 2014. If a large employer fails to offer appropriate
coverage, that employer may be
liable for a tax penalty.
How is the Tax Penalty Triggered?
• If the employer does not offer coverage, and at least one of its full-time employees claims the premium
tax assistance tax credit, or• The employer does offer coverage,
but the coverage fails to meet the minimum essential coverage
threshold and one full-time employee is certified to claim the premium tax
credit
The tax penalty can be
triggered in one of
two ways:
Which Employers Will Face these Penalties?
• Employers with at least 50 Employees will face penalties if one or more of their full-time
employees obtains a premium credit through an Exchange.
• How does the law define 50 Employees?
• PPACA refers to “full-time equivalents”
• A subsequent rule expanded on this definition to include both full and part time
workers
• Guidance issued by DOL expanded the definition to include employees of a
“controlled group” of corporations, employees, partnerships, proprietorships, etc.,
that are under common control
How can an Employer determine if it is a “Large Employer”?
• Both full and part time employees are included in the calculation
• Full time employees: work 30 or more hours per week
• Seasonal employees who work for fewer than 120 days per year are not
considered to be full time employees
• Part time employees: include hours worked by taking the total number of hours
worked by individuals who work less than 30 hours per week and dividing the total by
120
• If an employer has more than 50 employees for 120 days or less in the preceding
year, the employer will NOT be considered a large employer
Employee Calculations: an Example
• A firm has 35 full time employees who work at least 30 hours a week.
• In addition, the firm has 10 part time employees who all work 24 hours per
week (for a total of 96 hours per month)
10 employees x 96 hours = 960 total hours
960 hours / 120 = 8
The part time employees would be counted as 8 full time employees
• 35 full time employees + 8 =
• 43 “Employees”
Who can potentially obtain a premium credit?
• Individuals can obtain a premium assistance credit if:
• They are not eligible for Medicare, Medicaid, or other similar programs
• They are not offered employer-sponsored health benefit coverage
• Their income is between 138% and 400% of the federal poverty level
If an individual is offered employer sponsored health benefits, but these
health benefits are unaffordable, that individual can obtain a premium
assistance credit.
• Benefits are unaffordable if:
• The individual’s required contribution toward the plan premium for self-
only coverage exceeds 9.5% of their household income, OR
• The plan pays for less than 60%, on average, of covered health care
expenses.
What are the tax penalties for large employers who do not offer coverage?
The monthly penalty a large employer is obligated to pay for not offering any
coverage is equal to $2,000 divided by 12, multiplied by the difference of the
number of full-time employees employed during the applicable month minus
the first 30 full-time employees. Only full-time employees (not full-time
equivalents) are counted for purposes of determining the penalty.
(Number of Full-Time Employees) – 30 x (2,000/12)
For example, a firm with 51 employees would be subject to:
51-30 x (2,000/12) = total monthly penalty
$3,500 per month
What are the tax penalties for large employers who offer coverage that is not affordable?
A large employer who offers coverage that does not satisfy the minimum
value threshold or minimum affordability threshold is assessed a monthly
penalty of $3,000 divided by 12 times the number of employees that qualify
for the tax credit.
For example, a firm with 51 employees of whom 5 qualify for the tax credit
would be subject to a penalty of:
5 x (3,000/12) = $1,250
Employer W2 Reporting Requirements
• Applicable to all employers that provide group health plans, including federal, state, and local governments,
and religious organizations.
Employers need to report the cost of employer-sponsored health care
coverage on employees’ W-2 forms for all tax years starting on or after January
1, 2011.
• The employer was required to file fewer than 250 W-2 Forms for the preceding calendar
year, or •The employer is a federally recognized Indian
tribal government
An employer need not report
if:
Excise Tax on “Cadillac” Health Plans
In an effort to penalize employers who offer excessively rich health benefit plans, PPACA includes a new excise tax on high-cost health plans, called “Cadillac” health arrangements.
This is a new non-deductible 40% excise tax that some experts have estimated will affect more than half of large employers’ active health plans by 2018.
Medicare Tax Increase
• PPACA includes a provision that will create a new tax for certain Americans.
• Specifically, section 1411 of PPACA imposes an additional tax of 3.8% if certain conditions are met as described below.
• Currently, individuals pay a Medicare tax of 2.9% of their wages. The new tax is in addition to the current Medicare taxes, and expands the definition of income subject to Medicare taxes. The tax also applies to trusts and estates.
• The tax applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012
• The tax will apply to single taxpayers with a modified adjusted gross income of $200,000 or higher and married taxpayers with a modified adjusted gross income of $250,000 or over. The tax also will apply to a married person filing separately whose modified gross adjusted income exceeds $125,000
Part IV: PPACA Reflection Points
PPACA’s Impact: Positive
Opened a national dialogue on insurance
coverage
Federal funding for uninsured and underinsured
Fundamental insurance reform
Leveraging NAIC expertise
Expansion of care management, wellness
programs, medical home, etc.
More patients are insured with first dollar
coverage
Move to electronic medical records
PPACA Impact: Challenges
Adopted by a slim majority in Congress
Not supported by the majority of Americans
Regulatory Concerns• PPACA law is 2,700 pages and regulations are over 9,000 pages.
• More regulations and guidance to come. • Federalism: State losing ground
• Over-reliance on “interim final rules”
PPACA Impact: Challenges
• Additional cost burdens (e.g., expansion of mandated benefits, appeal rights, etc.)
• CBO now estimates that PPACA will cost over $1.76 trillion
• States cannot afford to build, support and maintain many of PPACA’s requirements
• Significant compliance costs for health plans and others
• Budget concerns including Congress’s sequestration rule
Health care spending is over 17% of the U.S. GDP
MLR premium rebates are an administrative burden
Young subsidize the old, and males subsidizes the females
Premium increases
How will PPACA Impact Employers?
As highlighted earlier in the presentation, PPACA will affect employers differently, depending upon their size and whether they currently offer health insurance.
• Small employers (less than 50 workers) will face no new requirements but will have new insurance options made available to them through the new health insurance exchanges.
• Medium-size employers (50 to 100 workers) will have access to these new coverage options as well, but may face some financial penalties
•The vast majority of large employers (more than 100 workers) will be impacted significantly including penalties, automatic enrollment requirements, etc.
Lots of Government Oversight
The Elections & Financial Impact
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: This webinar is for informational purposes only.
Questions & Answers
For additional health care Reform updates, please monitor:
• www.benefitmall.com• www.health careexchange.com