Health Plan and Provider Collaboration… Really?7 A Health Policy Home Run: Principles for Health...
Transcript of Health Plan and Provider Collaboration… Really?7 A Health Policy Home Run: Principles for Health...
1
Health Plan and Provider Collaboration…
Really?
Ken JandaPresident and CEO
Community Health Choice, Inc.
February 26, 2018
2
About Community
• Community Health Choice, Inc. (Community) is a Texas non-
profit corporation (IRC 501(c)4), organized for the promotion
of social welfare and community benefit
• Licensed and regulated by the Texas Department of
Insurance as a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) and
Third Party Administrator (TPA)
• A Safety Net Health Plan as defined by the Affordable Care
Act, focused on serving low-income populations
• Affiliate of the Harris County Hospital District (Harris Health
System); created by Harris Health in 1997
3
Our Programs
Community serves over 425,000 Members in the following programs:
• Medicaid STAR Program for low-income children and pregnant
women (1997)
• Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for the children of low-
income parents, including CHIP Perinatal benefits for unborn children
(2006)
• Health Insurance Marketplace Plans offered to individuals under the
ACA, primarily with subsidized premiums for lower income families
(2014)
• Regional HMO coverage for State of Texas employees (ERS) (2015)
• Administrator for Marketplace plans offered by Sendero Health Plans
in Austin (2017)
• Administrator for collaborative safety net projects including TexHealth
3-Share insurance subsidies (2008), DSRIP (2013), and NAIP (2015)
4
Service Area Map
5
Health Care Triple Aim
6
What Are Our Goals?
A Health Policy Home Run
First Base: Personal accountability for
health and financing
Second Base: Coverage for everyone
Third Base: Simplify funding and
administration of programs
Home Plate: Slow healthcare cost
increases through provider payment reform
7
A Health Policy Home Run: Principles for Health Care Reform
1B: Personal accountability for health
Encourage healthy behaviors and consumerism
Everyone pays something: cost-sharing based on income
Choices of plans and benefits, with transparency of costs
2B: Coverage for everyone
A basic benefit plan for all based on age, disability, family need
Ability to “buy up” for additional services
Individual mandate or auto-enrollment, with subsidies based on age and income
3B: Simplify funding and administration of programs
Reduce administrative burden on providers and consumers through consistent program
administration across Medicare, Medicaid, and private plans
Eliminate complex supplemental provider funding in government programs
Require multi-year rate guarantees from insurers
HP: Slow healthcare cost increases through provider payment reform
Encourage coordinated, less fragmented care (medical homes, ACOs, etc.)
Restructure provider payments to reward efficiency and quality (value-based payments)
Assure fair payment rates across programs, including safety net providers
8
Health Care System Still
in Need of Reform
In the past, we operated in a system that emphasized volume
where providers treated patients and payers reimbursed
providers for the cost of treatment - fee-for-service.
9
Shift in our Health Care System
• Recognizing the need for payment reform that improves the performance and
sustainability of the U.S. health care system, a new strategy began developing
across the country - value-based care.
• ACOs in ACA, MACRA, DSRIP projects in Medicaid and other governmental
drivers, quickly followed by commercial carriers.
• Even with recent CMS backtracking, value-based contracting is the future
Quality of Care Cost Effectiveness Population Health Mgmt.
Value-Based Care
10
Shift in our Health Care SystemLAN Alternative Payment Model Framework
Source: https://hcp-lan.org/groups/apm-framework-refresh-white-paper/?utm_source=LAN+Newsletter&utm_campaign=8b39f5033d-
DSRI_APM_Refresh_2017_05_23&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1b87e2051f-8b39f5033d-150318153
11
Shift in our Health Care SystemPayment Reform Goals
Source: https://hcp-lan.org/groups/apm-framework-refresh-white-paper/?utm_source=LAN+Newsletter&utm_campaign=8b39f5033d-
DSRI_APM_Refresh_2017_05_23&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1b87e2051f-8b39f5033d-150318153
12
Measuring Outcomes/Quality
• Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS):o Standardized measures, some outcomes, but many process measures:
• Potentially Preventable Events (PPEs):o Admissions (PPAs)
o Readmissions (PPRs)
o Emergency room visits (PPVs)
• Cost effectiveness measured by Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY):o Living longer is the best method to measure outcomes
o Being able to walk, talk, see, hear is better than not (quality of life)
o Being able to work and getting back to work faster is important to
employers/government entities that pay most of the cost
o Pain, suffering or financial burden of treatment should be worth the gain
o All things being equal, lower cost/less service with same outcome is a positive
outcome
13
Healthcare Effectiveness Data
and Information Set (HEDIS)
• Sponsored by National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA)
• Tool used by more than 90 percent of America's health plans to
measure performance on important dimensions of care and service
• Consists of 81 measures across 5 domains of care
o Effectiveness of Care
o Access/Availability of Care
o Experience of Care (Patient Satisfaction)
o Utilization and Relative Resource Use
o Health Plan descriptive Information
• HEDIS makes it possible to compare the performance of health
plans on an "apples-to-apples" basis
14
Texas Medicaid and the
Pay for Quality Program (P4Q)
• New program will kick-off CY 2018 putting 3% of MCO capitation at risk
• Designed to focus on prevention, chronic disease management and
maternal and infant health
• Goal – simple and easy to understand, reward high performance and
improvement and promote transformation and innovation
• Types of at-risk measures:
o HEDIS
o Potentially Preventable Events (PPEs)
• Performance on each measure is evaluated against:
o Performance against benchmarks (national HEDIS percentiles, actual to
expected ratio)
o Performance against self (previous year’s performance)
• New “Bonus Pool” measures; not at risk measures
15
At-Risk Measures
Measure STAR CHIP STAR+PLUS
Adolescent Well Care X
Well Child Visits in the First 15 Months of Life X
Prenatal Care X
Postpartum Care X
Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition X
Weight Assessment and Counseling for Physical Activity X
Upper Respiratory Infections X X
Potentially Preventable Emergency Visits X X X
Controlled Hemoglobin A1C X
Diabetes Screening Antipsychotics X
Cervical Cancer Screening X
Controlling High Blood Pressure X
16
Bonus Measures
(Revenue Not at Risk)
Measure STAR CHIP STAR+PLUS
Potentially Preventable Admissions X
Potentially Preventable Readmissions X
Potentially Preventable Complications X
Childhood Immunization Status (Combo 10) X
Low Birth Weight X
Prevention Quality Indicator – (PQI) Composite X
CAHPS Children/Adults – Good access to urgent care X (C) X (C) X (A)
CAHPS Adults – Rating their health plan a 9 or 10 X X
CAHPS Caregivers – Rating their child’s health plan a 9 or 10 X
17
HEDIS – How are we Doing?
Measure (CY 2015)Community’s
Results
NCQA
90th Percentile
Adolescent well-care 85.38% 83.75%
Prenatal care (STAR) 89.66% 91.73%
Postpartum care (STAR) 63.22% 72.43%
Childhood immunizations 70.85% 78.06%
Well child check-up in the first 15 months of life 59.62% 73.88%
18
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare
Providers and Systems (CAHPS)
• CAHPS Surveys are a set of tools that assess patient satisfaction with the
experience of care and service. Developed and maintained by the National
Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Agency for Health Research
and Quality (AHRQ).
• Increasingly important for providers and health plans
• Community Rating above the 2015 NCQA 95th percentile.
19
Why Focus on Cost Control?
Chandra, Amitabh, Anupam B. Jena, and Jonathan S. Skinner. 2011. "The Pragmatist's Guide to Comparative Effectiveness Research."
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2): 27–46.
• More services do not necessarily improve outcomes
• More costly technologies do not necessarily produce better outcomes
• Patients have limited ability to compare outcomes to cost (i.e., value).
Lack of transparency of provider pricing is a big problem.
19
20
Payer/Provider Relationship Moving Forward: Paradigm Shift
• Integrated delivery systems o Improved ability to coordinate care
o New payment mechanisms (bundled payments, gain sharing, and capitation)
o Understanding insurance risk (prevalence) vs. management risk (resource utilization)
• Impact of data o Sharing of EHR data
o Thinking populations, not just patients
o Building trust between providers and insurers
o Consumerism requires more cost transparency
21
Community is Helping
Providers Transition
Category 2: • Provider Incentive Program (PIP) for primary care and Ob-Gyns
(Fee-for-Service with incentives)o Foundational incentives including electronic medical records
o Incentives for PPVs
o HEDIS incentives
Category 3:• Bundled payment pilot for maternity
o Mom and baby
o Includes prenatal and post-partum care plus nursery/NICU
Category 4:• Full-risk capitation with experienced integrated systems like Kelsey
Seybold
22
Health Care Moving Forward
No matter what happens in DC, it’s time for payers AND
providers to learn to trust each other and work collaboratively to
navigate the transformation of our health care delivery system.
Health Plan and Provider Collaboration….Really!
23
Questions & Discussion
Contact Information:
Ken Janda
(713) 295-2410