HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL...

Valid as of June 2007

110491

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate F - Food and Veterinary Office

DG (SANCO)/7421/2007 - CP Final

COUNTRY PROFILE OF IRELAND

ON FOOD AND FEED SAFETY, ANIMAL HEALTH, ANIMAL WELFARE AND PLANT HEALTH


2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 3

1. COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND OVERALL DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES.................................................................................................. 4

2. COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL CONTROL SYSTEMS................................................................................................................. 12

2.1. Control system for animal health .................................................................... 12

2.2. Control system for food of animal origin........................................................ 15

2.3 Control system for imports of animals and food of animal origin .................. 17

2.4 Control system for feedingstuffs and animal nutrition.................................... 19

2.5 Control system for TSE/ABP.......................................................................... 21

2.6 Control system for veterinary medicines and residues.................................... 25

2.7 Control system for foodstuffs and food hygiene............................................. 28

2.8 Control system for imports of food of plant origin ......................................... 31

2.9 Control system for plant protection products (PPP)........................................ 33

2.10 Control system for animal welfare .................................................................. 36

2.11 Control system for plant health ....................................................................... 38

3. FOLLOW-UP OF FVO INSPECTIONS .................................................................. 40

3.1. Animal health .................................................................................................. 44

3.2. Food of animal origin...................................................................................... 46

3.3. Imports of animals and food of animal origin................................................. 49

3.4. Feedingstuffs and animal nutrition.................................................................. 52

3.5. TSE/ABP......................................................................................................... 52

3.6. Veterinary medicines and residues.................................................................. 53

3.7. Foodstuffs, food hygiene and GMO................................................................ 54

3.8. Imports of food of plant origin........................................................................ 54

3.9. Plant Protection Products ................................................................................ 55

3.10. Animal welfare ................................................................................................ 55

3.11. Plant health...................................................................................................... 58

ANNEX I – ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS AND SPECIAL TERMS .................... 59

ANNEX II – OVERVIEW OF STAFF RESOURCES..................................................... 63

ANNEX III – TRAINING SYSTEMS.............................................................................. 64


3

INTRODUCTION

This country profile has been drawn up by the Food and Veterinary Office (FVO), a directorate of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection of the European Commission.

The aim is to present in summary form, and in a user-friendly structure and style, the latest information available to the FVO on how control systems for food and feed safety, animal health, animal welfare and plant health are organised in Ireland.

The information in the country profile has been compiled from:

• recent written submissions and background documentation from the Irish authorities detailing how control systems are organised;

• the results of missions to Ireland carried out in recent years by inspection teams from the FVO and, in particular, a general review mission in Ireland in June 2007 to evaluate the full range of control systems for food and feed safety, animal health, animal welfare and plant health.

The country profile is presented in three parts:

• Part 1 describes the overall organisation of the Irish authorities and the respective responsibilities of the relevant ministries in relation to the different components of the control system. A chart is used to help the reader better understand the inter-relationships between the responsibilities of the different bodies.

• Part 2 gives a more detailed description of the main responsibilities for each of the 11 separate systems that form the complete range of control systems in Ireland covering the whole chain of plant, animal and food production. Flow charts are used to help the reader.

• Part 3 contains an overview of the missions carried out by the FVO to Ireland since 1999 and, for each control system, gives an assessment of specific recommendations reviewed in the general review mission of June 2007.

The country profile will be updated at regular intervals based on the results of future FVO missions and other relevant information received by the Commission from the Irish authorities.

Acronyms are used extensively throughout this country profile for the sake of brevity. A list of acronyms, abbreviations and special terms is given in Annex I to the country profile as a guide for the reader.

Valid as of June 2007 4

1. COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND OVERALL DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

There are two Government departments in Ireland mainly responsible for developing policy and legislation for food and feed safety, animal health, animal welfare and plant health. These are the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF) and the Department of Health and Children (DoHC). The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI), under DoHC, provides support to the Government departments in their role of formulation of food policy and legislation.

In addition, local authorities (LA), which come under the local government structure of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government (DEHLG), are responsible for enforcing this legislation in low throughput slaughterhouses and small meat plants. The 33 LA are multi-purpose bodies responsible for an extensive range of services, including veterinary services. Most LA have a local structure involving: a Country Manager; a Director of Services; the County Veterinary Officer; Temporary Veterinary Inspectors (TVI); and administrative support.

The FSAI is the Central Competent Authority (CCA) with overall responsibility for the enforcement of food legislation in Ireland. This responsibility is managed through Service Contracts (SC), between the FSAI and the individual Competent Authorities (CA) involved in the enforcement of food legislation. FSAI also has a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with certain bodies which have a role in food safety controls but are not specifically involved in the enforcement of food legislation.

Ministries/other Responsible Bodies

The following table lists the relevant authorities with responsibility for food and feed safety, animal health, animal welfare and plant health in Ireland. Where available, links to internet web pages are also given. An overview of the staff resources of these authorities is given in Annex II.

National level Website (if available) DAFF Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/

DoHC Department of Health and Children http://www.dohc.ie/

FSAI Food Safety Authority of Ireland http://www.fsai.ie

HSE Health Service Executive http://www.hse.ie/en/

SFPA Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority http://www.sfpa.ie

DEHLG Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government

http://www.environ.ie/en/

CES Customs Division of the Revenue Commissioners

http://www.revenue.ie/

RPII Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland http://www.rpii.ie

NSAI National Standards Authority of Ireland http://www.nsai.ie/

NCA National Consumer Agency http://www.nca.ie/

IMB Irish Medicines Board http://www.imb.ie/

County level LA Local Authorities


District/local Level

Laboratories CVRL DAFF Central Veterinary Research Laboratory http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/

CMCL DAFF Central Meat Control Laboratory http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/

RVL DAFF Regional Veterinary Laboratories http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/

PCLS DAFF Pesticide Control Laboratory Service http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/

MI Marine Institute http://www.marine.ie/home/

FSLS HSE Food Safety Laboratory Service

Other Bodies INAB Irish National Accreditation Board http://www.inab.ie/

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF)

DAFF is the CA for policy development, negotiation at European Union (EU) level, the implementation in national law of EU rules, and official controls in the following areas:

• primary production of food;

• slaughtering, cutting, preparation and processing of foods of animal origin, up to, but not including, retail level;

• animal health, animal welfare, feed safety, plant health;

• fisheries.

The following services have responsibility for official control:

• Agricultural Inspectorate (AI), under the Chief Inspector (CI), in the following Divisions: Feedingstuffs, Fertilizers, Grain, Pigs and Poultry (FFGPPD); Pesticides Control Service (PCS); Horticulture and Plant Health (HPHD); the Organic Unit (OU); and the Dairy Regions and Laboratory Division (DRLD);

• State Veterinary Service (SVS), under the Chief Veterinary Officer (CVO), comprising the Animal Health and Welfare Inspectorate (AHWI), the Veterinary Public Health Inspectorate (VPHI) and the Border Inspection Posts (BIP);

• DAFF Laboratory Service, under the Director of Laboratories;

• DAFF Administration;

• Crop Production and Safety Division (CPSD); Animal Health and Welfare Division (AHWD).


The FFGPPD is responsible for enforcing legislation on feedingstuffs. This involves carrying out official controls, including inspection, sampling and analytical activities in relation to all levels of the feed chain. The PCS is responsible for implementing controls associated with the authorisation, marketing and use of Plant Protection Products (PPP). The HPHD is responsible for implementing legislation in the plant health and horticultural areas. Administrative functions for these areas are carried out by CPSD.

The DRLD is responsible for carrying out official controls in milk treatment and processing establishments, collection centres and storage premises. The Egg and Poultry Inspectorate (EPI) is responsible for official controls on egg producers and at egg packing centres. It is also responsible for verification of compliance with marketing standards for eggs and poultry from primary production through to retail. The OU is responsible for the inspection and certification of organic food.

SVS advises the Minister of Agriculture on animal health, animal diseases, zoonoses and public health issues relating to food and products of animal origin. It also assists in the preparation, implementation and enforcement of EU and national legislation; implements control measures to protect the health of animal and human populations; and provides certification for animals and animal products intended for export.

SVS has a pyramidal management structure under the Chief Veterinary Officer (CVO). The service is sub-divided into four Regional Animal Health and Welfare Inspectorates, each under the supervision of a Senior Superintending Veterinary Inspector (SSVI). There are 28 District Veterinary Offices (DVO), each of which is under the supervision of a Superintending Veterinary Inspector (SVI) and staffed by Veterinary Inspectors (VI), Agricultural Officers (AO) and administrative and clerical staff. DVO are responsible for: animal health and animal welfare; on-farm TSE controls; rendering plants; knackeries; controls of Veterinary Medicinal Products (VMP); and for the implementation of controls of residues in live animals.

VPHI is divided into six Regional Veterinary Public Health Inspectorates, each under the supervision of an SVI. VPHI supervises slaughterhouses, meat processing plants, milk pasteurisation establishments and egg product facilities.

DAFF is responsible for the control of the importation of live animals and products of animal origin from third countries at BIP.

Marine Institute (MI) - see under Laboratory Services.

Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority (SFPA)

SFPA was established on 1 January 2007 under national legislation (the Sea-Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Act of 2006), with the independent statutory remit to enforce national and EU Regulations on sea-fisheries conservation and seafood safety.

The SFPA is responsible for the implementation and enforcement of national and EU legislation on the health conditions for fish, live bivalve shellfish and fisheries products at all stages, from primary production and processing by fishing vessels, through to processing at approved land-based processing centres. It provides these services under a Service Contract with the FSAI.


The SFPA deploys an inspectorate composed of Sea Fisheries Officers (SFO) who work closely with other government agencies, such as the Irish Naval Service, the FSAI and the MI, in the implementation of fisheries control and seafood safety regulation programmes. The members of the Authority are assisted by four Regional Fisheries Control Managers, six Senior Port Officers (SPO), 48 SFO, and administrative staff. A review of management structures is being undertaken and staff are being recruited. For operational purposes, the SFPA has divided the country into three regions, each under the control of a Regional Sea Fisheries Control Manager.

Department of Health and Children (DoHC)

The Food Unit of DoHC is responsible for all policy issues in respect of food safety, for formulating and transposing EU food safety legislation and for reviewing existing national regulations. Its remit covers the retail sectors for food and non-retail processing and distribution of non-animal origin foods.

FSAI

FSAI, established through the FSAI Act 1998, is responsible for ensuring that food produced, distributed or marketed in the State meets the highest standards of food safety and hygiene reasonably attainable. The FSAI's responsibility extends from the farm gate to the final consumer.

The FSAI's structure comprises: a Board, a Scientific Committee, a Consultative Council and a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) responsible for five operational divisions: Food Science and Standards; Service Contracts; Consumer Protection; Audit and Compliance; and Corporate Services.

The Scientific Committee is an advisory body composed of scientists from a range of disciplines working in a voluntary capacity. The Food Safety Consultative Council comprises representatives of consumers and industry who consider food safety issues and provide input to the agenda of the FSAI. The Food Science and Standards Division provides a scientific base to support enforcement and compliance activities. The Service Contracts Division manages the relationships between FSAI and the CA involved in food safety controls. The Consumer Protection Division provides technical support in the areas of: environmental health; public health nutrition; veterinary public health and agriculture; and training and compliance. The Audit and Compliance Division is the audit section of the FSAI. The Corporate Services Division is responsible for finance, human resources, and information technology.

FSAI is responsible for: co-ordination of food control activities within and between the CA; determining inter-agency supervisory arrangements to minimise gaps and overlaps; and ensuring consistency of performance. This is achieved through:

• management of the official control activities through Service Contract arrangements with other bodies;

• carrying out risk assessment to underpin risk management decisions and actions;

• the provision of scientific and technical support to the CA through publications and training.

FSAI participates in regular, scheduled, liaison meetings with relevant CA, which provide a forum for ensuring that national policy objectives are reflected in the operational plans of the CA.

http://www.fsai.ie/about/index.asp

http://www.fsai.ie/legislation/related/index.asp


FSAI has developed Guidance Notes (GN), Codes of Practice (COP) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for its own operations and those of the CA.

Service Contracts (SC)

FSAI has concluded SC with the following bodies: DAFF; Health Service Executive; 31 LA; Sea-Fisheries Protection Agency (SFPA); Marine Institute (MI); National Consumer Agency (NCA); National Standards Authority of Ireland (NSAI). In addition, it has agreed MoU with Customs Division of the Revenue Commissioners and Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII). SC are multi-annual contracts specifying the requirements of the FSAI relating to food inspection and analysis to be carried out by the CA. They include chapters on: general requirements; monitoring; inspection services (including frequency of controls); laboratory services; labelling and traceability enforcement; staffing resources; training; data collection and reporting; and information on the means by which FSAI will audit the service contracts.

Health Service Executive (HSE)

The objective of the HSE is to improve, promote and protect the health and welfare of the public in an efficient and effective manner. It is contracted to the FSAI to provide the following food control services:

• Environmental Health Service (EHS)

• Food Safety Laboratory Service (FSLS)

• Public Health Medical Service (PHMS)

HSE is divided into four geographical regions, with between 7 to 9 environmental health sections in each, totalling 33 nationally. Each section is supervised by a Principal Environmental Health Officer (PEHO).

The services provided by EHS include inspection of food businesses, with food sampling to ensure compliance with food law and the management of food alerts and outbreaks.

HSE is responsible for import controls on products of non-animal origin.

FSLS – see under Laboratory Services.

PHMS participates in multi-disciplinary teams investigating, managing and controlling outbreaks of food-borne illnesses, along with EHS and FSLS.

Health Protection Surveillance Centre (HPSC) is the national agency with responsibility for the surveillance of communicable diseases in Ireland. It collects data on infectious diseases and provides data on food-borne illness to the relevant authorities.

Local Authority Veterinary Service (LAVS)

LAVS provides national co-ordination of LA Veterinary Officers (LAVO), responsible for official controls in low throughput slaughterhouses and cutting plants. In slaughterhouses, ante-mortem and post-mortem examinations are carried out by LAVO or TVI. SOP are developed by the LAVS in consultation with FSAI, through the Service Contract. One LA (Cork County Council) operates its own veterinary laboratory (Cork County Council Laboratory, CCCL).


National Consumer Agency (NCA)

NCA is responsible for checking compliance with food legislation by means of the inspection and verification of general food labelling information. NCA deals with general food labelling complaints and enquiries, and carries out labelling surveys.

National Standards Authority of Ireland (NSAI)

NSAI is responsible for checking compliance with legislative requirements in relation to the recognition and exploitation of natural mineral waters.

Customs Division of the Revenue Commissioners

The Customs Division implements import and export controls. It has a MoU with FSAI in relation to imports of food of non-animal origin and a service contract with DAFF in relation to imports of products of animal origin.

Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII)

RPII is the national organisation responsible for monitoring and advice on ionising radiation. It carries out extensive monitoring of radioactivity in the food chain and the environment. It is also responsible, with FSAI, for granting food irradiation licences to irradiation facilities.

Irish Medicines Board (IMB)

IMB is responsible for the authorisation of all categories of veterinary medicines products (VMP).

Laboratory Services

A number of laboratories in Ireland, managed by Government Departments, LA, HSE and privately carry out analyses in relation to food controls.

The primary DAFF laboratories are located in Backweston Campus, Cellbridge, Co. Kildare. These are: the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory (CVRL); Central Meat Control Laboratory (CMCL); Pesticide Control Laboratory (PCL); Central Plant Laboratory (CPL); and the Dairy Science Laboratories (DSL). The DSL has two associated regional laboratories. The Blood Testing Laboratory (BTL) is located in Cork and there are five Regional Veterinary Laboratories (RVL). The State Laboratory (SL) is also located in Backweston.

The FSLS of the HSE is a network of laboratories comprising three Public Analyst Laboratories (PAL) and seven Official Food Microbiological Laboratories (OFML) responsible respectively for the chemical and microbiological testing of foodstuffs. PAL are the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for certain chemical parameters. All of these laboratories are accredited to ISO 17025.

The MI is responsible for marine research, technological development and innovation. It provides analytical and technical services to SFPA. MI carries out analysis to ensure compliance with legislative requirements with respect to general food law, official controls, food hygiene, contaminants, residues (VMP), microbiological criteria and marine biotoxins. MI is NRL for certain parameters.


Preparations in Ireland for implementation of the Food and Feed Controls Regulation

Ireland is well advanced in its implementation of the Food and Feed Controls Regulation. FSAI is the single contact point. The draft multi-annual national control plan (MANCP), covering the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2011 and prepared jointly by FSAI and DAFF, has been submitted to the Commission.

Competent Authority Audit Systems

Each CA is required under the terms of its Service Contract with the FSAI to carry out official controls in accordance with documented procedures. The larger official agencies have put in place internal audit systems. For those CA with certified/accredited Quality Management Systems (QMS), the internal audit system is an integral part of QMS and subject to external certification/accreditation audits. The FSAI carries out audits in the CA which do not have systems for internal audit, to determine compliance with the requirements of Article 4 (6) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004.

DAFF has established an Internal Audit Unit which operates according to the guidelines contained in Commission Decision 2006/677/EC, on the conduct of internal audits as required by Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004. The objective of the Unit is to ensure that the implementation of official controls by the VPHI and those performed under the management of the Chief Inspector, meet the requirements of EU legislation. A single integrated Internal Audit Unit is due to be established in 2007 in the SVS, with sections for Veterinary Public Health, Animal Health, Animal Welfare and the Veterinary Laboratory Service.

Internal audits are carried out in accordance with documented procedures and, as far as possible, by personnel independent of the function being audited.

FSAI carries out the following three categories of audits under its annual audit programme:

• Targeted Audits which determine compliance with a specific piece of EU or national legislation, including Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004. These audits are typically carried out in food business operations (FBO). Following the audit, the FBO is issued with a report which details, where appropriate, any non-compliance identified. The CA supervising the food business is responsible for ensuring that appropriate corrective action is put in place for each non-compliance;

• Service Contract Audits designed to ensure that the CA adhere to the terms and conditions set out in their contract;

• Closeout Audits – These audits follow-up recommendations made in FVO reports to check that the necessary corrective action has been taken.

National accreditation bodies

Certification audits are carried out by the certification bodies NSAI or SGS Ireland Ltd. Laboratory accreditation audits are carried out by the INAB. The CA internal audit systems are carried out to ISO 9001:2000 or ISO 17025 standards.


The following chart gives an overview of the distribution of responsibilities in relation to control systems and operational levels.

More detailed descriptions of the allocation of responsibilities between authorities in relation to each control system are given in the following chapters.

Ani

mal

hea

lth

Food

of a

nim

al o

rigin

Impo

rts o

f ani

mal

s and

food

of

anim

al o

rigin

Feed

ings

tuff

s

Feed

ings

tuff

s - im

ports

TSEs

/AB

P

Vet

erin

ary

Res

idue

s

Vet

erin

ary

med

icin

es -

auth

oris

atio

n, m

arke

ting

and

use

Food

hyg

iene

GM

O

Nov

el

Irra

diat

ed fo

od

Impo

rts o

f foo

d of

pla

nt o

rigin

Plan

t Pro

tect

ion

Prod

ucts

re

sidu

es

Plan

t Pro

tect

ion

Prod

ucts

–

auth

oris

atio

n, m

arke

ting

and

use

Ani

mal

wel

fare

– sl

augh

ter/f

arm

s A

nim

al w

elfa

re -

trans

port

Plan

t hea

lth

Policy, co-ordination D

AFF

DA

FF/ D

oHC

DA

FF

DA

FF

DA

FF

DA

FF

DA

FF

DA

FF/IM

B/S

FPA

DA

FF/ D

oHC

DA

FF /D

OH

C /

DEH

LG

DO

HC

DO

HC

DoH

C/D

AFF

DA

FF/D

OH

C

DA

FF/D

EHLG

DA

FF

DA

FF

Co-ordination of controls

DA

FF/S

FPA

FSA

I

DA

FF/C

UST

OM

S/S

FPA

/FSA

I

DA

FF

DA

FF/C

UST

OM

S

DA

FF/F

SAI

DA

FF/S

FPA

/LA

/ FS

AI

DA

FF/IM

B

FSA

I

DA

FF /E

PA /F

SAI

FSA

I

FSA

I /R

PII

FSA

I/ H

SE/D

AFF

/ C

UST

OM

S

DA

FF/F

SAI

DA

FF/E

PA

DA

FF

DA

FF/C

UST

OM

S

Implementation of controls

DA

FF/S

FPA

/LA

VS

FSA

I/DA

FF/H

SE/

LAV

S/ S

FPA

DA

FF/C

UST

OM

S/

FSA

I/ /S

FPA

DA

FF

DA

FF/C

UST

OM

S

DA

FF/F

SAI/L

AV

S/

HSE

DA

FF/S

FPA

/LA

VS/

FS

AI

DA

FF/IM

B

FSA

I/DA

FF/H

SE/

LAV

S/ S

FPA

/ NSA

I

DA

FF /E

PA /F

SAI

FSA

I/HSE

FSA

I /R

PII/H

SE

FSA

I/ H

SE/D

AFF

/ C

UST

OM

S

DA

FF/F

SAI/H

SE

DA

FF/E

PA

DA

FF/S

FPA

/LA

VS

DA

FF/C

UST

OM

S

Laboratories

CV

RL/

RV

L/B

TL

RPI

I/CM

CL/

DSL

/MI/

CC

CL/

FSL

S/SL

CM

CL/

DSL

/MI/

CV

RL

SL/P

AL/

PRL/

CPL

SL/P

AL/

PRL

CV

RL/

STS/

RV

L

CM

CL/

SL/N

FC/

PCL/

MI/D

SL

IMB

con

tract

ed la

bs

FSLS

/CM

CL/

LA

SL/

com

mer

cial

labs

N /A

PALS

/Com

mer

cial

la

bs

FSLS

/PC

L

PCL

PCL

CV

RL

CPL

Risk assessment, scientific advice

CV

RL

CM

CL/

DSL

/MI/F

SAI

CM

CL/

DSL

/MI/

FSA

I/CV

RL

SL/P

AL/

PRL/

C

PL

SL/P

AL/

PRL

CV

RL/

FSA

I

CM

CL/

SL/N

FC/

PCL/

MI/D

SL/

FSA

I IM

B c

ontra

cted

la

bs

EHS/

FSLS

/FSA

I

FSA

I / E

PA/

DA

FF

FSA

I

FSA

I /R

PII

FSLS

/FSA

I

PCL/

FSA

I

PCL

CV

RL/

FAW

AC

CPL


2. COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITIES IN RELATION TO INDIVIDUAL CONTROL SYSTEMS

2.1. Control system for animal health

DAFF

FSAI

LA SVS(ERAD + AHD) SFPA MICo-operation

Policy; legislationPolicy; legislation

Identity checks;control ofregisters;

health controls

Analysis;results;controls

Ante + postmortemchecks

Low throughputslaughterhouses Farms

Highthroughput

slaughterhouses

Fisheryestablishments

LAVS

Identity checks;movement controls;ante + post mortem

checks

DVO

CVRL

Analysis;results

Service Contract /MoU

Competent Authorities

DAFF is the CA for official controls on animal health. The Animal Health Division (AHD) of the AHWI, within the SVS, carries out the controls. Each LA is the CA for implementing rules and regulations in slaughterhouses in its area with low throughput. For fisheries, DAFF is responsible for policy and legislation, while controls are carried out by the SFPA, in co-operation with the MI.

Holding registration, animal identification and movement controls

A herd-number is allocated to each herd of bovine animals. The herd number is also the registration number of a holding which includes all of the land used by the herd, contiguous or not. The DAFF cattle database contains a register of all bovine herds. For sheep, goats and pigs the holdings are registered with DAFF under a number with the same format as a herd-number. The Animal Health Computer System (AHCS) holds all information relating to herd numbers.


Cattle identification and tracing includes: ear tagging; cattle identity papers/passports; on-farm register; and the Cattle Movement Monitoring System (CMMS) database. All cattle are tagged at birth with a unique identification number issued by the DAFF Animal Identification Movement (AIM) system. An official register is supplied to each animal keeper, who is obliged to make all entries in date order within seven days. The CMMS records the origin, identity, movement and disposal of all cattle, using input from: cattle birth and movement data; livestock marts; slaughter plants; and live export points.

Sheep are registered in the National Sheep Identification System (NSIS). Farmers are required to tag all animals born on their holdings either before movement off the holding or by 15 December of the year of birth, whichever date is the earlier. Farmers are required to have a holding register to record the details of the animals on the farm and the details of all movements onto and off the farm. DAFF maintains a central register of sheep holdings in its computer database. The data comprising the central register is divided between three inter-linked databases: Corporate Customer System (CCS); AIM; and Internet Mapping and Area Payments (IMAP).

Pigs are registered in the National Pig Identification and Tracing System (NPITS). Pigs moving from the farm direct to the slaughterhouse must be identified with a tattoo (“slap mark”) showing the herd identification number. All other pigs leaving the farm must be tagged with the herd number. Breeding pigs on the holding must be tagged with both the herd and an individual number.

Goats are registered in the National Goat Identification System and goat herds are registered on a central database.

Animal health controls

The Eradication of Animal Disease Division (ERAD) is responsible for the eradication of both TB and brucellosis and has its own management structure within the AHWI. It operates alongside the AHD. Holdings are selected by the SVS at central level, based on risk criteria. The control system in place for sheep identification is based on checks carried out on holdings by DAFF. These checks are performed annually in 10% of sheep holdings, in the course of inspections for the Ewe Premium Scheme (EPS).

At the slaughterhouses, checks on animal identification are performed by establishment staff and, in the case of establishments approved for intra-community trade, by Temporary Veterinary Inspectors (TVI) employed and supervised by the relevant CA (DAFF and LA).

SFPA carries out controls at all fish establishments and processing plants at point of sale and at landing in the case of fishing vessels.

Contingency Plans (CP)

A comprehensive programme is in place to deal with the threat of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD), Classical Swine Fever (CSF), Avian Influenza, and new emerging diseases. Sector specific plans are available on the DAFF Animal Health and Welfare internet page. Updated operations manuals are in place for FMD, Avian Influenza, CSF, Newcastle Disease (ND) and Bluetongue (BT). These are subject to constant review to take account of any changes to legislation, etc.


Laboratories

CVRL provides laboratory support (bacteriology/parasitology, pathology and virology) for national disease eradication programmes.


2.2. Control system for food of animal origin

DAFF DoHC

FSAI

SFPA(SFO)

HSE(EHS)LA

SVS(VPHI)

AI(DI + EPI)


Policy; legislation

Approvals;controls

Approvals; controls

Smallthroughput

plants; dairyproductionholdings

Meatplants

Dairy + Eggs+ Poultry plants

Manufacturing,processing,wholesale,

distribution plants;retail and catering

Fishery productsat all stages

from landing tosale

RegionalOffices

Regional Offices

LaboratoriesAnalysis;results

LAVS

Approvals;controls

ServiceContracts

Regional Offices

Approvals;controls

Regional Offices

Approvals;controls


DAFF and DoHC are responsible for developing food policy and legislation with the support of the FSAI, which has overall responsibility for the enforcement of food legislation in Ireland. DAFF, HSE, LA and SFPA are responsible for enforcement under Service Contract to FSAI of food legislation in the establishments under their supervision.

Registration and approval of establishments

DAFF, LA and HSE have administrative responsibility for granting approvals. SFPA is responsible for approving certain establishments under national legislation implementing Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004.

All establishments supervised by DAFF and LA had to be approved or re-approved based on new legislation. Applications for approval under Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 include information on an estimate of throughput and trade patterns. A protocol on throughput limits for determining the appropriate supervising authority has been agreed between the FSAI, LA and DAFF. The evaluation of establishments supervised by DAFF is carried out by a VI and RSVI and a certificate of approval is issued. The evaluation of establishments supervised by LA is carried out by a VI. The FSAI assigns the approval number on the basis of this evaluation. A certificate of Full Approval or Conditional Approval is issued by the LA and a copy forwarded to FSAI.


In accordance with legislation, HSE approves premises subject to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 which it supervises. It is setting up approval mechanisms in conjunction with the FSAI in respect of these premises.

The FSAI compiles lists of approved establishments supervised by the CA and maintains the central listing system on its website.

Official controls and inspection at establishments

VPHI is organised centrally, regionally and locally with separate structures for the meat and milk sectors. Large scale meat establishments are supervised by DAFF via the Meat Inspectorate at central level, six regions represented by RSVI and 80 VI assisted by 705 TVI. VI and/or TVI permanently located in the larger meat and poultry slaughtering and processing plants are responsible for: the provision of ante and post-mortem inspections; controls of structural and operational hygiene standards; and controls of residues. Other plants are visited and inspected regularly for compliance with health and hygiene regulations.

Official controls in milk plants, which vary depending on the activity, are carried out by the DI at milk manufacturing plants and by the SVS in liquid milk pasteurising plants. The DI is organised into five regions and has a total staff of five AO, 11 Assistant AO and 23 technical staff. AO carry out inspection duties at dairy plants and checks on holdings supplying milk to manufacturing plants.

The EPI is responsible for eggs and poultry controls in: laying hen units; egg storage and handling facilities; egg packing centres; wholesale and retail establishments; free range broiler/turkey units; and poultry-meat processing, wholesale and retail establishments. The Meat Policy Division (MPD) is responsible for registration and approval of establishments, and the Poultry Unit of the Feedingstuffs, Fertilisers, Grain, Pigs and Poultry Division (FFGPP) is responsible for inspections. The country is divided into three regions for the purposes of eggs and poultry controls.

LA are responsible for the supervision of low throughput slaughterhouses and meat establishments and also hygiene aspects of milk production holdings supplying milk to pasteurisation plants.

HSE staff are involved in controls of registered establishments in the retail sector, some cold stores and catering facilities.

SFPA carries out official controls on fish, shellfish and fishery products from first landing or harvesting, to movement, processing, wholesale and distribution.

Official controls on identification mark and traceability

DAFF is responsible for the traceability and labelling of beef and beef products in high throughput meat establishments. LA are responsible for carrying out checks on traceability and labelling in low throughput slaughterhouses and meat establishments. The HSE is responsible for the retail sector and some wholesale operations.

Laboratories

See under Laboratory Services in Part 1.


2.3 Control system for imports of animals and food of animal origin

DAFF RevenueCommissioners

FSAI

SVS(BIP/DVO) SFPA Customs

Division

Policy; legislation Policy; legislation Policy; legislation

Service Contracts/MoU

Controls of importsControls of importsControls of imports

Co-operation;notification

Live animals + animal products; ICW;

personal luggage

Live fish + fish products

Personal luggage;postal consignments

Laboratories

Analysis;results


DAFF, through the SVS, is the CA for veterinary import controls of products of animal origin and live animals, except for fish and fishery products, which are the responsibility of SFPA. While both CA are involved in the operation of BIP, DAFF alone operates the controls on illegal imports and international catering waste (ICW). The control of BIP is performed under service contract to the FSAI. Co-operation between the different bodies is ensured through a working group on import control, consisting of staff from FSAI, DAFF, SFPA, Customs, VI from LA and representatives of HSE. Co-operation with Customs at local level is frequent and informal. Consignments of animal products are flagged on the Customs Automated Entry Procedure System which ensures that they are detained pending examination at a BIP. DAFF officials notify Customs of products cleared via the common veterinary entry document (CVED) for products of animal origin and live animals. Co-operation between Customs and SFPA takes place locally when required for individual consignments of fish and fish products. Customs also co-operates with EHO employed by the HSE.

The BIP and TRACES manuals are produced by DAFF. The BIP Manual is produced in co-operation with SFPA. Circulars are issued from DAFF headquarters as the need arises. These provide guidance on procedures or legislation, and are notified to Customs at central level for information and distribution to local level.

FSAI is the contact point for the Rapid Alert System for Feed and Food (RASFF) messages. All BIP have direct access to the Commission database.


Import Controls

The following three BIP are approved in Ireland:

Location Type Approval according to

Commission Decision 2001/881/EC, as amended

Dublin airport E, O Dublin port HC (2), NHC

Shannon airport HC(2), NHC(2), U, E, O

Each BIP is supervised by a VI from the relevant DVO. In locations where there is no BIP, the local DVO operates the controls on international catering waste disposal and the checks for detection of illegal imports of products of animal origin and live animals in personal luggage of passengers arriving at entry points to Ireland. Between three and ten Portal Inspectors assist the VI at BIP in carrying out their duties. These are technical staff who are full-time employees of the CA.

Customs co-operate with DAFF on control of the imports of live animals and products of animal origin from third countries at BIP. Controls include documentary, identity and physical checks. DAFF staff carry out checks for detection of illegal imports of products of animal origin and live animals in personal luggage of passengers arriving at the main entry points to Ireland. SFPA staff support DAFF staff in relation to fish and fishery products.

Checks on incoming consignments are based on: pre-notification via the CVED; manifest checks; flagging on the Customs Automated Entry Procedure System (AEP); and random spot checks. In addition Customs refer any consignments of products of animal origin, detected during searches for excisable goods, to DAFF officials.

Customs carry out checks on personal luggage of crew members disembarking from ships from third countries and on postal consignments sent to private persons. Customs are permanently present at all main points of entry. Other points of entry are staffed by Customs when ships from a third country arrive.

Customs use the equipment of the authorities at Shannon, Cork and Dublin airports to scan freight consignments. Scanning equipment for luggage of passengers at the main points of entry is used systematically by Customs but DAFF staff use it only in exceptional circumstances.

Landing and disposal of ICW is carried out under an annual licence by waste disposal operators who collect the waste in leak-proof skips and transport it for burial at an approved landfill site.

Records of all checks on illegal imports are maintained in paper format at each BIP and seizures are recorded on an electronic database.

Laboratories

Approved CA laboratories are available to carry out testing under the sampling plan, for safeguard decisions, or for suspect samples.


2.4 Control system for feedingstuffs and animal nutrition

DAFF Revenue Commissioners

FSAI

CustomsDivision

AFCG(FFGPPD +CPSD)

InformationSystemsDivision


Controls through pre-notification;

reportingRegional Offices

Implementing Annual control plan;

reportingSL;

other labs

Field staff inspections;sampling;reporting

Analysis;results

Co-operation

Maintenance of databases on inspections,sampling results, etc

FBO Feed importers

Service Contracts / MoU

Controls


DAFF is the CA for the transposition of EU legislation on feedingstuffs and the control authority for its implementation. Within DAFF at central level, the Animal Feedingstuffs Control Group (AFCG), comprising FFGPPD and CPSD, co-ordinates the national inspection and sampling programme for feedingstuffs.

For inspection and control purposes, the country is divided into 14 regions, with a Supervisory Agriculture Officer (SAO) assigned to each region. The SAO reports, via a District and Area Superintendent, to the AI at central level.

The main areas of the co-operation between the FI and DAFF Veterinary Division include: salmonella analysis of environmental samples; the control of processed animal proteins; and medicated feedingstuffs. To ensure co-operation in feed controls, the FI meets with the SL, Customs, FSAI, and the Irish Grain and Feed Association to which some 85% of FBO are affiliated.


Registration and approval of establishments and intermediaries

The European Communities (Food and Feed Hygiene) Regulations 2005 (Statutory Instrument (S.I.) No. 910 of 2005) transposes Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 on Official Food and Feed Controls and Regulation (EC) No. 183/2003 on Feed Hygiene. The Regulations provide for definitions, requirements for approval and registration for FBO; withdrawal of such approvals and registration; maintenance of a register; appointment and powers of authorised officers; fees; and sanctions.

Official controls

The annual control programme is based on risk analysis, which takes into account: outcome of previous inspections; nature of risks to health or the environment; operators' own controls and history of compliance; Community co-ordinated controls; and information on controls in other MS or scientific findings. The control programme is reviewed quarterly.

The CA has developed application and declaration forms, checklists and inspection report templates for the approval and registration of FBO. Existing operators approved or registered under Council Directive 95/69/EC were required to indicate their intentions to continue operations under Regulation (EC) No. 183/2003. All other FBO coming under the Regulation, with the exception of primary producers, completed appropriate forms for registration. Primary producers have been registered through the 2006 Single Farm payment system. Plans are in preparation to ensure that all FBO acknowledge that they understand the requirements of, and declare conformity with the feed hygiene legislation, as required by the Regulation. Compliance is verified and evaluated on an on-going basis by routine, unannounced, official controls carried out by the CA. For each shortcoming detected during an inspection, a non-conformance report is issued. Shortcomings are followed-up in subsequent visits.

In addition to unannounced inspections carried out by field staff, the CA procedures require staff at central level to carry out audits of all establishments manufacturing additives, premixes, mineral mixtures or compound feedingstuffs, to check implementation of their auto-controls. Staff at central level inspect on-farm mixers requiring approval. Local SAO visit new intermediaries of mineral mixtures requiring approval.

Data on FBO are fed into relevant databases maintained for this purpose by the DAFF Information Systems Division.

Laboratories

The State Laboratory (SL) is the official laboratory responsible for feedingstuffs analysis. It is the designated NRL for feed additives and GMO analyses. The Irish Equine Centre (a commercial laboratory) is the principal laboratory used by DAFF to undertake microscopic analysis for the presence of products of animal origin in feed material and compound feeds. The STL of DAFF is the designated NRL for microscopic analysis.


2.5 Control system for TSE/ABP

TSE


DAFF is the CA responsible for controls on BSE epidemio-surveillance. The TSE and Animal By-Products Division (TSE/ABPD) of the VPHI has overall responsibility for implementing controls. Private veterinary practitioners (PVP), working as TVI, carry out activities such as: notification of BSE suspects; occasional sampling of fallen stock; and carrying out ante and post-mortem inspections in slaughterhouses, where they perform tasks under contract to DAFF or LAVS.

Official controls on the feed ban are the responsibility of AFCG within the FI, which has an overall co-ordinating role for feed controls carried out by local inspectors.

FSAI is the CA responsible for the enforcement of official controls on the removal of Specified Risk Material (SRM) in food establishments. DAFF operates under an SC with FSAI in regard to its food safety role and is the CA for the enforcement of the SRM regime in large capacity premises. FSAI has similar SC with the LAVS for small capacity slaughterhouses and cutting plants, and HSE for retail butcher shops.


Epidemio-surveillance

S.I. No 61 of 1989 established the obligation for PVP to notify any clinical suspect animal detected while carrying out private work on-farm. It also established the same obligation for the keeper of the animal. The same legal provision lays down that, where a VI has reasonable grounds for believing that the movement of an animal other than a suspected case, may give rise to the risk of spread the disease, the movement may be prohibited.

SOP on guidelines and other information on handling BSE clinical suspects and confirmed cases are in place. When an animal is declared an official BSE suspect, and where BSE cannot be ruled out, it is euthanized on the spot, either on-farm or in the slaughterhouse lairage. The carcase is collected by the Suspect Collection Service (SCS) of DAFF and the head is sent to one of the Regional Laboratories responsible for collection of the brain.

With regard to Scrapie in sheep and goats, the CA has taken several initiatives to raise awareness among farmers and PVP. These include: an awareness video; advisory leaflets distributed to all farmers; information on the recognition of the disease distributed to all PVP; lectures to veterinary clinical societies; lectures to farmers groups on the latest control methods; and posters displayed in the waiting rooms of DVO and in markets. DAFF also attends shows and major farming events to promote awareness of the disease.

Specified Risk Material (SRM)

Removal of SRM from food is verified as part of the official controls of food establishments. In slaughterhouses and knackeries, SRM forms are used as an audit tool to verify that SRM is delivered to the designated processing plant. SRM from small capacity slaughterhouses sent to processing plants is accompanied by commercial documents signed by the slaughterhouse operator and the haulier. Fallen stock collected by the knackeries is also sent to processing plants with a commercial document signed by the haulier. A form completed during audits in slaughterhouses lists the relevant factors, including SRM, to be evaluated during the audit and requires a risk value to be attributed to each factor.

To date, 97 of a total of 1,727 butcher shops have applied for authorisation under S.I. No. 528 of 2004. This figure is low and is in keeping with the nature of the butchery trade in Ireland, whereby traditionally most of the animals traded on the domestic market are under 24 months old.

Total Feedban

The total feed ban is implemented by means of SI No. 612 of 2006. Derogations have been provided for certain products of animal origin, subject to specified requirements.

In general, the risk assessment for the sampling is made at central level by staff of the AFCG, with some flexibility for sampling at local level. Guidelines for local inspectors on sampling on farms where feedingstuffs are present, and for on-farm mixers, have been issued by the AFCG. A regional officer is responsible for carrying out a supervisory visit for the different inspection tasks over a three-year cycle. In order to ensure that the annual inspection programme, including sampling, is harmonised and implemented on schedule by the local inspectors throughout the country, AFCG establishes a detailed list


of establishments to be visited by inspectors and maintains a close follow-up of the inspection and sampling programme.

Laboratories

The RVLS perform tasks for the diagnosis of cases of BSE. Confirmation of BSE cases is carried out by the CVRL. In addition, private laboratories have been authorised to perform rapid tests for BSE. A private laboratory is authorised for the performance of microscopic analysis of feed and is contracted by DAFF to carry out testing of all samples of feed for the presence of constituents of animal origin and fishmeal in line with Directive 2003/126/EC. The Seed Testing Station (STS) provides advice in relation to the implementation of the contract between the private laboratory and DAFF.

ABP

DAFF

FSAI

EPASVS

(VPHI -TSE/ABPD)

SFPA

Policy; legislation Policy; legislation

DVO

Instructions; SOP;supervision

Landfill;waste disposal

Processing plants;intermediate plants;collection centres;

composting and biogas plants

Fish establishments

Controls; approvals

Controls;approvalControls

ServiceContracts

LA

LAVS

Low throughput

plants

Controls


DAFF is the CA for policy and enforcement of ABP legislation. The TSE/ABPD has overall responsibility for implementation of controls. DAFF enforces the ABP Regulation directly in the premises that it supervises. The FSAI has no responsibility for the ABP Regulation, as this is not included in its remit. Official control of ABP at food establishments is generally carried out as an extension of official food control by the supervising agency.


DAFF is responsible for the supervision of high throughput meat and all milk establishments. Other establishments, such as low capacity slaughterhouses, cutting plants, meat product plants and retail shops remain under the responsibility of LA or HSE. Fishery products establishments come under the supervision of SFPA. Landfill and waste disposal is the responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Approval of ABP plants and other premises

An approval system is in place for processing plants, storage plants, intermediate plants, and collecting centres. Establishments have been informed about the requirements for approval under the ABP Regulation in correspondence and meetings between DAFF and the industry. Plants requiring approval must submit an application form, which is followed by an approval inspection by the CA. In the case of low capacity incinerators, initial approval is for the processing of Category 2 and 3 material only. At present, there are no Category 2 plants in Ireland. Category 2 material is disposed of with Category 1 material. Approval to incinerate Category 1 material is only given if it is clearly demonstrated that the incinerator is satisfactory for the disposal of such material.

Biogas and composting has only been practiced in Ireland since the transposition and implementation of the Landfill Directive. In addressing this method of processing ABP, DAFF has compiled a list of biogas and composting plants that will use ABP. These plants primarily handle catering waste, manure and milk products and guidelines have been drafted to cover their approval.

Official Controls

SOP have been developed for official controls of ABP at food establishments. DAFF has produced its own guidelines, while FSAI, in co-operation with LAVS, has facilitated the development of an SOP relating to ABP and other legislation. The system includes advice to the industry and forms to record the movement of ABP.

The written procedures require a permanent presence of a DAFF technical staff member at Category 1 and 3 rendering plants. A VI from the local DVO calls about three times per week to certify all dispatches from each plant and supervise production. The VI also samples tallow and meat and bone meal (MBM) for impurities and microbes respectively once per month or as required by the ABP Regulation. Other plants are inspected less frequently. Category 2 intermediate plants/collection centres are supervised monthly by a VI and annually by a VI from DAFF centre. In addition to this, a VI visits each plant daily, excluding Sundays, to perform TSE sampling on carcases fallen animals.


2.6 Control system for veterinary medicines and residues

Veterinary Medicinal Products (VMP)

IMB

VMP

Authorisations

DAFF

SVS(VPHI

ERAD-VMS)

DVO

Manufacturers;wholesalers;

retailers; farms;PVP

SIU

FSAI

Policy; legislation

Instructions;reporting

Controls on marketing/use;

licensing; sampling

Targettedinvestigations

ServiceContracts

IMB contracted labs.

Analysis;results


The Irish Medicines Board (IMB) is responsible for the authorisation of all categories of VMP. The Veterinary Medicines Section (VMS) of the ERAD Division within DAFF is responsible for controlling the distribution and use of VMP, as well as licensing wholesalers and retailers.

Official controls on marketing/use

Only products which are licensed for the Irish market by EMEA, IMB or DAFF, as appropriate, may be imported, sold or used. A comprehensive regime of licensing is in place for wholesalers and retailers engaged in distribution of VMP. This does not apply to veterinary practitioners and pharmacists, who are subject to oversight by professional regulatory bodies. As part of the three year licensing cycle, all wholesalers, retailers and manufacturers of medicated feed are inspected at least once.

At the time of licensing, all VMP are assigned a designated mandatory ‘route of supply’ and unique licence number, both of which must appear on the labelling. Checks by DVO staff are supplemented by the Special Investigation Unit (SIU) of DAFF, which carries out focussed investigations arising from intelligence gathered, or as a result of routine residue inspections.

Laboratories

Analysis of samples is carried out by IMB contracted laboratories.


Residues

DAFF

FSAI

SVS(VPHI

ERAD-VMS)SFPA MI LA

Policy; legislationPolicy; Legislation

Co-operation

DVO

Implementationof NRCP;

supervision

Slaughterhouses; meat plants; farms

Fish processingplants

Low throughputslaughterhouses

Implementationof NRCP;

supervision

Controls; samplingreporting

Variouslaboratories

Consultation onNRCP; reporting

Service Contracts

Analysis;results

SIU

Targettedinvestigation

LAVS

Implementationof NRCP


The National Residue Control Plan (NRCP) is developed and implemented by DAFF and the MI, in consultation with FSAI, SFPA and LA, under Service Contract with FSAI. DAFF is responsible for all sectors, except aquaculture. The VMS, in consultation with appropriate DAFF inspectorates, is responsible for designation and control of laboratories. The SFPA, with support from MI, is responsible for residue controls on seawater and freshwater, and on wild and farmed fish. LAVO carry out meat inspections and daily supervision of low throughput slaughterhouses and take samples for NRCP purposes.

Official controls on residues

DAFF issues the annual sampling plan of the NRCP to DVO, taking account of the production in each region. Written instructions on the targeting of sampling are distributed to the relevant services, and sampling is organised to achieve an equal distribution throughout the year for each of the substances covered by the NRCP. Sampling at farm level is performed unannounced. The results of the NRCP are published annually, in accordance with Council Directive 96/23/EC.

Regular contact takes place between all of the bodies involved in the execution of the NRCP. Each LA carries out sampling for residues in accordance with a local residue sampling plan developed annually by FSAI, which forms part of the NRCP. Samples are taken at farms and establishments by DAFF, MI and LA inspectors. The laboratory reports all results to DAFF, which notifies the relevant district authorities and SFPA of a positive result. SFPA serves prohibition orders under the FSAI Act for residue violations.


When a residue violation is detected under the NRCP, an investigation, initiated at the farm of origin, is carried out, as appropriate, by the DVO and/or the SIU, which is particularly active in this area. It includes an interview with the farmer, and an inspection and/or search of records and premises. Where appropriate, further sampling may be undertaken and advice provided. DAFF and SFPA consider that they have sufficient enforcement powers for follow-up investigations after a residue violation. A number of successful prosecutions have been undertaken by the SIU for VMP misuse.

Laboratories

Analyses under the NRCP are performed in seven different laboratories, reporting to three different Departments: CMCL, PCL and DSL of DAFF; SL of the Department of Finance; Ashtown Food Research Centre (AFRC) of the Agriculture and Food Development Authority; MI; and a private laboratory approved and funded by DAFF provides analysis of NRCP samples.

The annual NRCP is prepared following a co-ordination meeting between DAFF and the relevant laboratories.


2.7 Control system for foodstuffs and food hygiene


The Food Unit of DoHC is responsible for: all policy issues in respect of food safety; formulating and transposing EU food safety legislation; and reviewing existing national regulations. FSAI is the CA with overall responsibility for the official control of food. DAFF, HSE, SFPA and LA have responsibilities for controls in their respective areas of competence.

Licensing and Registration of food premises

HSE maintains a register of food establishments as required under Regulation 882 /2004.

HSE, the LA and DAFF are responsible for approving certain establishments under national legislation implementing Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004.

Official controls of food premises

FSAI co-ordinates official controls by means of an SC with each CA. It carries out audits of food businesses and the CA to ensure compliance with legislative and contractual requirements. As part of its SC, the annual control plan, prepared by each CA, is agreed with the FSAI.

The EHS of the HSE carries out inspections of food businesses, combined with food sampling, to ensure compliance with food law and the management of food alerts and outbreaks. In addition, it encourages compliance through information and training activities. HSE is responsible for official control of foodstuffs at retail level.


DAFF is responsible for official controls during primary production and harvesting of foods of plant origin. Certain DAFF inspectors carry out checks at retail level for compliance with marketing standards. Samples taken by DAFF during its inspections are analysed by a laboratory.

The frequency of inspection visits is based on the nature of the food business, the volume of activity and prior history of the establishment.

Good Hygiene Practice (GHP) Guides

The GHP guides are prepared by the sector concerned under the guidance of an FSAI Working Group, and issued by NSAI.

Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF)

The control point for RASFF is the Consumer Protection Division of the FSAI, which plays the central role in crisis management and contingency planning. FSAI notifies alerts on the basis of: RASFF; industry recalls or withdrawals; enforcement activity; surveillance sampling; and consumer complaints. FSAI bases its assessment on: known distribution of the food in Ireland; possible arrival of food in Ireland from another country known to have received the food; the type and possible uses of the food; the nature of the risk; and any other potential implications for consumers. RASFF information is communicated by means of: email to listed databases of official agencies, food industry and other stakeholders; fax; SMS/text message; press release, where appropriate; and the FSAI website. Through its SC, the FSAI has a central co-ordination role in contingency planning, involving joint development of plans with agencies; providing training; and carrying out exercises. Information from alerts and incidents is used proactively in developing surveillance and enforcement plans at national and local level.

Laboratories

See under Laboratory Services in Part 1. EHS and FSLS, meet frequently to discuss food monitoring and surveillance programmes.

GMO

Competent authorities

DAFF is responsible for enforcing legislation in relation to GM feed and GM seed. EPA is responsible for enforcing legislation in relation to live GMO. FSAI is responsible for enforcing legislation in relation to GM food.

Official controls of GMO in food, including at import

FSAI carries out an annual survey of the food supply at retail level. The OU within the AI is responsible for the inspection and certification of organic food, under service contract to FSAI.

Official controls of GMO in propagating material

EPA and DAFF are responsible for controlling GMO in propagating material.

Laboratories


The SL is NRL for GMO.


31

2.8 Control system for imports of food of plant origin


The Food Unit of DoHC is responsible for all policy issues in respect of food safety. HSE is responsible for import controls on food of non-animal origin, which are carried out by its Port Health Section. However, control of pesticides residues on imported foods of plant origin is a function of the Pesticide Control Service (PCS) within the AI of DAFF.

FSAI have a MoU with Customs in relation to imports of products of non-animal origin. FSAI, through an interagency working group, keeps Customs informed of changes in legislation and any other relevant information.

Import controls

HSE liaises with Customs at points of entry for food. Environmental Health Officers (EHO) visit the relevant ports and take samples from imported consignments. The HSE has no permanent physical presence at the ports for this purpose. The majority of checks on imports relate to Sudan red and palm oil. Customs formally notify HSE of any imports of food considered suspect following documentary, identity or physical checks, or subject to EU safeguard measures. When Customs are advised of products subject to emergency measures, they apply a red or orange routing to imports from the countries concerned of food bearing the relevant customs tariff numbers (CN codes). Red routed entries trigger a physical check on the goods and orange routed entries trigger a documentary check, and possibly a physical check. When suspect products of non-animal origin or foods subject to EU emergency measures are found, Customs suspend


release of the product concerned from customs control for up to three working days, and immediately notify the HSE or FSAI.

HSE operates a quality management system with a full set of SOP and standard letters in relation to import controls.

Laboratories

The FSLS of the HSE carries out analysis of imported food of plant origin.


2.9 Control system for plant protection products (PPP)


DAFF is the CA for the relevant legislation. The PCS of the AI is a centralised service with no regional structure. It is responsible for the authorisation of pesticides and for controls on the marketing and use of the products. PCS reports annually to the Commission on inspections carried out in Ireland.

PCS is the CA for the detection of obsolete PPP. The disposal of such products is carried out by the EPA in the manner prescribed by the PCS.

Authorisation of PPP

Within the PCS, the Pesticide Registration Division is responsible for the authorisation of pesticides. Some 960 PPP are authorised, and approximately 500 containing 233 active substances, are present on the market. A database of authorised PPP is available on the PCS website. Following an application by a company, the data is evaluated by the relevant technical units and a decision is issued, normally within 15 months. The CA estimates that some 60% of evaluations are based on mutual recognition with other MS. The CA co-operates with other MS, such as UK, Belgium and the Netherlands, in sharing experience on risk management.

Official controls on marketing/use

Checks on retailers and wholesalers of PPP are planned and performed by the PCS. They are carried out on the basis of an annual control plan in accordance with instructions laid down in a procedures manual for inspection and sampling of plant protection and biocidal products. Some 500 companies in the sector are considered to be “major” operators. These include agricultural co-operatives, retail outlets, wholesalers and manufacturers. A further 1,000 companies regarded as “minor” operators include garden


centres and supermarkets. Inspections are carried out in all tillage and horticultural areas of the country. A database records addresses of retailers and wholesalers and details of all inspections carried out since 1999. The criteria used in selecting outlets to be inspected include: those inspected in 2006 with recorded infringements; those not inspected since 2004; all wholesalers/distributors of PPP; complaints and parallel imports.

In addition, as part of the cross compliance inspections carried out under the single payment scheme, inspections are carried out at the request of the PCS in co-operation with the DAFF Integrated Controls Division, which is responsible for managing the programme of inspections.

In cases of serious or repeat infringements, the product may be seized and a formal warning issued. In cases of persistent infringements, the PCS recommends prosecution of the offender by the Minister for Agriculture and Food.

Obsolete pesticides

Obsolete pesticides are defined by the PCS as pesticides which are “no longer registered or registerable in the world”. There are no known stocks of such products in Ireland. The disposal of obsolete pesticides is required to be carried out at the owner’s expense by contractors who must be licensed by the EPA.

Laboratories

A dedicated formulation laboratory of the PCL provides laboratory support to the Pesticide Registration Division to ensure that PPP comply with their authorised specification.

Residues

DoHC DAFF

FSAI AI(PCS)HSE

PCL

Wholesalers


ServiceContract

Analysis;results

Samplingbaby food

Monitoring plan;sampling



DAFF is the CA for legislation on pesticide maximum residue levels (MRL). DoHC is responsible for legislation on baby food. FSAI, which is responsible for the enforcement of baby food legislation, has contracted this work to the HSE via an SC. FSAI and DAFF are joint CA for monitoring and enforcement of legislation on pesticide residues in food. The current SC with DAFF includes the work of the PCS, which has the primary technical competence on pesticide residues.

Official controls on residues

PCS draws up the annual pesticide residue monitoring plan, in consultation with FSAI. The number of samples per food type is based on consumption data for adults and children of the particular food, and data on the presence of pesticides in the food. It also takes account of the capacity of the laboratory to analyse samples. On the basis of this information, the monitoring plan specifies the foods to be sampled, the number of samples to be taken and the pesticides for which they are to be tested. Where residues are detected in foods, FSAI and PCS follow an agreed documented procedure for MRL breaches. This procedure is reviewed regularly to ensure that it remains in line with best practice. Where residues that exceed the MRL are detected, follow-up action is taken by the PCS, in consultation with FSAI.

Laboratories

A dedicated pesticide residue laboratory of the PCL analyses samples of food for pesticide residues. It is accredited to ISO 17025 and is designated NRL for pesticides residues in: food of plant origin; food of animal origin; cereals; and single analytical methods. The samples, taken by PCS at wholesale level covering both imported and domestic produce, are brought by the sampling officer to the laboratory. All samples are routinely analysed for some 250 pesticides and their metabolites. If the residue level found is higher than the MRL and the residue is considered a risk to the consumer, the rapid alert process is followed.


2.10 Control system for animal welfare


DAFF is the CA for animal welfare. Responsibility for animal welfare on farm and during transport is delegated to the Animal Welfare Division (AWD) of the SVS. Welfare at slaughter in high-throughput slaughterhouses falls under the responsibility of VPHI, and in low-throughput slaughterhouses, under the LAVS. The CA is assisted with advice, upon request, by the Farm Animal Welfare Advisory Council (FAWAC) This body represents all the significant stakeholders and provides advice in relation to EU and national legislation and on-farm welfare generally. It has produced guidelines and booklets for farmers on animal welfare for the different species.

Official controls on farm

The CA sets annual targets for inspections and assigns specific shares in the overall total of inspections to be carried out by each DVO, with the aim of covering a statistically representative sample of farms. At local level, the VI selects the holdings for inspection. In some cases, in order to make the best use of resources, the inspections may be carried out in conjunction with checks for other purposes. The criteria applied for the selection of farms include: their previous welfare history; the number of animals; the type of animals; and whether the farming is intensive or extensive. Routine inspections are usually announced, while inspections following complaints and follow-up visits are carried out without prior notice.


Following the detection of deficiencies, actions available to VI include: sending an official letter to the farmer indicating the deficiencies and a deadline for remedial actions; serving a notice for corrective action, with the possibility of a fine of up to € 2,500 and/or imprisonment in the case of failure to comply; and co-operation with the police and the Department of Justice in cases of serious animal welfare offences with a view to possible legal action.

The CA has taken several initiatives to inform farmers on animal welfare requirements, including: meetings with the sector's associations; publication of advertisements in newspapers; letters to individual farmers; and the production and distribution of information booklets and guidelines. In addition, the CA takes a pro-active role in identifying potential breaches of legislation through an early warning system which takes into account the ageing farming population and other social aspects.

Official controls during transport

The inspections are carried out by VI mainly at places of destination, particularly at markets and slaughterhouses. A target number of inspections per inspection site is set annually. Transportation of casualty and emergency slaughter animals must be certified in advance by a PVP. Such animals must be transported to the nearest available slaughterhouse. In case of serious infringements, legal proceedings may be taken in the courts and a fine imposed. The results of inspections, including infringements detected and actions taken, are recorded on the Animal Welfare Inspection System (AWIS) database. This database will be partly replaced by a new database, the Agricultural Field Inspection Training (AFIT), which is expected to be operational by the end of 2007.

The majority of animals exported to continental Europe from Ireland pass through approved assembly centres, where controls are carried out, route plans checked and endorsed, and appropriate certification issued. Livestock on roll-on/roll-off vessels are subject to a further check at the port of departure. Vehicles used for international transport are also inspected.

Official controls at slaughter

VPHI inspectors carry out controls on animal welfare in high throughput slaughterhouses, while the LAVO is responsible in low throughput slaughterhouses. The aim is to ensure that all animals slaughtered are spared any unavoidable stress, pain, or suffering during movement, lairage, restraint, stunning or slaughter.


2.11 Control system for plant health

FSAI

DAFF RevenueCommissioners

AI(HPHD/CPSD;

FSD)

CustomsDivision

RegionalOffices

Producers; importers;traders; nurseries

Plant imports


Implementation ofintegrated plant

health plan

Controls;notification to

HPHD

Controls; reporting;issuing plant passports

CPL;other

laboratories

Analysis;results

ServiceContracts /

MoU


DAFF, through the Plant Health section of the Horticulture and Plant Health Division (HPHD) and the Crop Production and Safety Division (CPSD), and in association with the Forest Service Division (FSD), is responsible for the negotiation, transposition and enforcement of legislation in the plant health area. The FSD is responsible for implementing the forestry aspects, such as surveys for harmful forestry organisms and the provisions relating to wood, wood packaging material and forest plants. The three services co-operate closely and a liaison committee is in place.

Plant passport system and internal market checks

Inspections are implemented on an annual basis. Control priorities, resource allocation and risk categorisation are detailed in the integrated plant health plan, with the assistance of the Forest Service and Seed Certification Division, where required. The plan includes: type and number of inspections to be undertaken; type and number of samples to be taken; organisms subject to control; and prioritisation of control measures. DAFF maintains a record of registered producers, importers and traders, in line with plant health regulations. DAFF endeavours to maintain protected zone status for relevant organisms, and to develop systems for rapid reaction to any outbreak of plant disease by means of surveys and follow-up actions to positive findings.


Import controls

Controls include: inspection of relevant direct imports of third country plant material and machinery; targeted inspections of imported plant and cut flowers; targeted inspections of imported ware potatoes for quarantine pests; inspections by the FSD of imports of wood and wood packaging; and inspections of potatoes and close-leaved vegetables for Colorado Beetle. In addition, exports are facilitated by inspection of bulbs to meet the US pre-clearance programme and issuance of plant health certificates in respect of plants and plant products for export to third countries. A new Customs computer entry system has been developed to facilitate the identification of Annex VB material. In addition, dedicated premises have been identified by the CA for plant health point-of-entry inspections, and the facilities and equipment are being upgraded.

Laboratories

The CPL comprises the STL and PHL. The STL has responsibilities for food safety control in the area of PAP analysis. The PHL provides analytical services in support of plant health controls.


3. FOLLOW-UP OF FVO INSPECTIONS

This part of the country profile gives an overview of the action taken on the recommendations made by the FVO to the Irish authorities in its inspection reports1.

The FVO has carried out 53 missions to Ireland since 1999, of which 48 have reached closeout stage.

Following these 48 inspections, 315 recommendations for corrective measures were made to the CA. The Commission subsequently closed 260 recommendations either on the basis of action2 taken by the CA or because they were no longer relevant.

The remaining 55 recommendations were followed up during the general review mission in June 2007.3 These consist of 5 cases where the response of the CA was considered to be outstanding and 50 cases where verification of promised action by the CA was considered necessary.

Following the general review mission, progress in relation to these 55 recommendations was assessed as follows:

Action taken/no longer relevant: 30

In progress: 20

Action still required 5

Total no. of recommendations: 55

This assessment is based on information and documentation received and reviewed during meetings with the CA in the course of the general review mission.

1 Those in respect of which the technical assessment by the FVO had been finalised (“closed-out”) at the time of

the general review mission. 2 For the purpose of the country profile the terms: "Action taken," "In Progress", “No longer relevant” and "Action

still required" are defined as follows:

"Action taken": Appropriate measures to address the recommendation have been implemented by the Competent Authority. The recommendation is therefore closed.

"No longer relevant": For administrative, technical or legal reasons follow up of the recommendation is no longer appropriate. The recommendation is therefore closed.

"In Progress": Appropriate measures to address the recommendation have been initiated by the Competent Authority but not all of the measures have been implemented. The recommendation therefore remains open.

"Action still required": Appropriate measures to address the recommendation have not been initiated by the Competent Authorities. The recommendation therefore remains open.

3 It should be noted that the number of recommendations in this overview does not represent, of itself, a measure of the degree of responsiveness by the Competent Authorities or of the seriousness of problems. Some recommendations may be related to minor technical aspects while others may refer to more problematic, systemic, issues. Some recommendations may have been closed and passed to subsequent inspections or may remain open but can only be verified by on-the-spot inspection.


Given the nature and scope of the general review mission, no verification through inspection on the spot was carried out. The assessment undertaken through the general review mission is considered complementary to other follow up actions and verifications that may be necessary and carried out as part of future sectoral inspections by the FVO. In this regard, unless otherwise indicated, recommendations classified as “in progress" or "action still required" are not considered to require any immediate specific legal or administrative action on the part of the Commission. These recommendations will remain the subject of monitoring by the Commission to assess progress. If as a result of this monitoring the Commission considers the situation in regard to any of these recommendations warrants additional action on its part, it will take the appropriate measures.

The following table gives an overview of FVO inspections to Ireland since 1999 and the assessment in relation to the 55 recommendations identified for further follow up in the general review mission.

The findings in relation to individual recommendations are presented in a separate chapter for each control system.

Summary of follow-up status

The following symbols are used in the summary table below:

X: no recommendation identified for follow-up during the FVO general review mission of April 2007 A: recommendations on which action has been taken P: recommendations on which action is still in progress R recommendations on which action is still required N: recommendations which are no longer relevant * : recent inspections for which response to their recommendations from the CA are awaited or are being assessed by

the FVO

S: Scheduled FVO inspection

Reference number and objectives of mission

Ani

mal

hea

lth

Food

of a

nim

al o

rigin

Impo

rts o

f ani

mal

s and

food

of

ani

mal

orig

in

Feed

ings

tuff

s and

ani

mal

nu

tritio

n

TSEs

\AB

P

Vet

erin

ary

med

icin

es a

nd

resi

dues

Fo

odst

uffs

and

food

hy

gien

e

Impo

rts o

f foo

d of

pla

nt

orig

in

Plan

t pro

tect

ion

prod

ucts

Ani

mal

wel

fare

Plan

t hea

lth

1026/1999 Disease eradication X 1043/1999 TSE X 1077/1999 TSE X 1079/1999 Food production X 1119/1999 TSE X 1208/1999 Plant health – protected zones X 1236/1999 Food production - poultry X 1241/1999 Plant health X 1491/1999 Animal welfare X 1002/2000 Food production – milk products X 1025/2000 BIP X 1106/2000 Identification/certification – live

animals X



Ani

mal

hea

lth

Food

of a

nim

al o

rigin

Impo

rts o

f ani

mal

s and

food

of

ani

mal

orig

in

Feed

ings

tuff

s and

ani

mal

nu

tritio

n

TSEs

\AB

P

Vet

erin

ary

med

icin

es a

nd

resi

dues

Fo

odst

uffs

and

food

hy

gien

e

Impo

rts o

f foo

d of

pla

nt

orig

in

Plan

t pro

tect

ion

prod

ucts

Ani

mal

wel

fare

Plan

t hea

lth

1143/2000 Food production – fish/fishery X 1178/2000 Food hygiene – HACCP X 1288./2000 To accompany US inspection team 1293/2000 BSE X 1294/2000 General – Public health X 1304/2000 TSE X 3161/2001 Food production – red meat X 3265/2001 Animal welfare – transport X 3292/2001 Fishery products X 3306/2001 BSE X 3313/2001 Food production – red meat X 3333/2001 Animal health – FMD X 3359/2001 Waste food controls X 3362/2001 Food production – farmed game X 3383/2001 Animal welfare – on farm X 8511/2002 Disease contingency plans X 8550/2002 Disease eradication control X 8574/2002 BSE X 8577/2002 Poultry – food production X 8595/2002 Plant health – import controls 2P 8668/2002 Operational audits – traceability X 8678/2002 Animal welfare – transport X 9049/2003 Residues 2A 9058/2003 Feedstuffs X 9065/2003 Contamination in feed X 9086/2003 Disease eradication X 9160/2003 BIP X 9193/2003 Disease contingency plans 2A

1P

9246/2003 Pesticide residues 2A 9286/2003 Food hygiene X 7027/2004 Fishery products

6A 5P 1R

7119/2004 Animal by-products 1A 1P

7365/2004 National Audit Systems 7542/2005 Identification / certification X 7658/2005 BIP 6A

2P

7659/2005 Import controls * 7704/2005 Animal feed / TSE 4A

1P

7784/2005 Food safety – Assessment of audits of CA controls – General Review Mission

*



Ani

mal

hea

lth

Food

of a

nim

al o

rigin

Impo

rts o

f ani

mal

s and

food

of

ani

mal

orig

in

Feed

ings

tuff

s and

ani

mal

nu

tritio

n

TSEs

\AB

P

Vet

erin

ary

med

icin

es a

nd

resi

dues

Fo

odst

uffs

and

food

hy

gien

e

Impo

rts o

f foo

d of

pla

nt

orig

in

Plan

t pro

tect

ion

prod

ucts

Ani

mal

wel

fare

Plan

t hea

lth

8052/2006 Animal welfare

4A 5P 1R

8166/2006 Food production – red meat * 8182/2006 Intra community trade of live animals 3A

3P 3R

8082/2007 BSE * 7366/2007 Disease eradication - Tuberculosis * 7421/2007 General Review Mission X X X X X X X X X X X


3.1. Animal health

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 9 inspections in Ireland in relation to animal health.

Out of a total of 55 recommendations contained in reports of these inspections, 12 were identified for follow up during the general review mission

As shown in the following tables, 5 recommendations have been classified as "Action taken", 4 recommendations have been classified as "In progress" and 3 recommendations have been classified as “Action still required”.

MR 9193/2003 of 28/10/2003 on Contingency plans for epizootic diseases.

Reference no. and Recommendation Findings Assessment

(16271) To proceed with training relating to OIE list "A" diseases, including simulation exercises and scenarios.

The CA provided a list of training courses since 2005 relating to the different diseases, of which Avian Influenza and BT were being treated with the highest priority. The CA confirmed that this type of training, which includes simulation exercises, will be ongoing. A planned FMD simulation exercise has not yet taken place.

In progress

(16272) To ensure that the full range of tests and activities prescribed by the Community legislation for National Reference Laboratories are applied by the CVRL where relevant.

CVRL has a standard PCR and a real time PCR for BT. CVRL participated in a ring trial organised by the Institute of Animal Health, Pirbright, in 2006 and reported excellent results. The other ring trials which took place in 2006 were for CSF, ASF, FMD, SVD, AI and ND, all of which produced good results.

Action taken.

(16275) To implement a system for identification of goats and farmed game.

National Goat Identification System was introduced in July 2005 and goat flocks are registered on a central database. The CA stated there has been a substantial reduction in farmed game produced.

Action taken

MR 8182/2006 of 24/04/2006 on Intra-Community trade in live animals.


(24565) To organise training on TRACES for all CA involved in ICT, to instruct staff to use TRACES for certification and to ensure correct use of the certification system.

The CA confirmed that ongoing training of staff is being provided. TRACES certificates are now being issued for pigs, sheep/goats. The TRACES format for horses has yet to be introduced.

In progress.

(24566) To apply and enforce the residency and stand still requirements of Art. 4a of Council Directive 91/68/EC for trade of sheep and goats for slaughter between Northern Ireland and Ireland.

Ireland has not yet taken action in response to this recommendation.

Action still required.

(24567) To ensure that legal provisions of Art. 4, point 2, of Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004, regarding the rules on identification of sheep and goats for intra-community trade are fully

The CA stated that single tags are permitted for movement of sheep for slaughter to NI, with the identity of each individual sheep being recorded. This situation is being examined in the context of developing an all-island animal health strategy.



MR 8182/2006 of 24/04/2006 on Intra-Community trade in live animals.


applicable in Ireland and to ensure that sheep or goats born after 9/07/2005 will not enter intra-community trade if they have not been identified before the animals leave the holding on which they were born in accordance with Article 4 (1) and 4. (2)(a) and (b) of that Directive. (24570) To update the approvals of live animal markets.

A new system of approval and inspection of live markets is in place. A new circular (ER7/2007) updating and standardising procedures on licensing of livestock marts has been issued. This includes a new follow-up procedure for renewal of a mart's licence.

Action taken.

(24571) To ensure that official controls on approved cattle assembly centres take into account all requirements of Art 10 of Council Directive 64/432/EEC.

The CA proposes to introduce an annual licensing/approval system for assembly centres. The draft is being discussed and action is expected to be completed by the end of 2007.

In progress.

(24572) To ensure that sheep markets are under official supervision.

The system of supervision has been under review with a view to strengthening it and bringing it more into line with the system that operates in cattle marts. This system was due be in operation by end June 2007.

In progress.

(24573) To enforce and control the cleaning and disinfection of livestock vehicles at assembly centres, livestock markets, and slaughterhouses

The controls in relation to cleaning and disinfection of livestock vehicles at assembly centres and livestock markets are deemed satisfactory. Regarding slaughterhouses, the checklist of controls to be carried out has been updated and the importance of these controls stressed at recent training.

Action taken.

(24574) To cease the discriminatory check on cattle arriving in Ireland from other Member States and to ensure that checks carried out on live animals at their destination are in accordance with Art 5(1) of Council Directive 90/425/EEC.

The CA explained that in Ireland 100% checks were required for TB testing. The result of this test must be entered on the bovine passport, without which all movement of the animal is prohibited. The CA stated that it would reflect on other possible solutions to enable it respect the legislation.


(24575) To implement animal welfare checks on the road as required by Art 8 of Council Directive 91/628/EEC and to ensure that horse transporters used for transports of over 8 h are included in the authorisation process.

Regulation 1/2005 replaced Directive 91/628 and abolished the requirement to carry out on-road checks. The CA confirmed that a comprehensive system is in place to meet the new legal requirement of issuing authorisations to all transporters involved in long journey transport (including horse transporters).

Action taken.


46

3.2. Food of animal origin

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 11 inspections in Ireland in relation to food of animal origin.


As shown in the following tables, 6 recommendations have been classified as "Action taken" and 5 recommendations have been classified as "In progress" and one recommendation has been classified as “Action still required”.

MR 7027/2004 of 18/10/2004 on Fisheries

Reference No. and Recommendation Findings Assessment

(20471) All relevant legislation should be fully and properly implemented and enforced by the DCMNR. In order to achieve this goal the setting up of the announced Specialised Food Safety Unit and the compatibility of the food safety and fisheries control duties dedicated to SFO should be considered as a priority.

Additionally the programmed increase of the number of qualified staff should continue.

The SFPA was established on 01 January 2007 under national legislation (The Sea-Fisheries and Maritime Jurisdiction Act of 2006) with the independent statutory remit to enforce all National and European Community Regulations regarding Sea-Fisheries Conservation and Seafood Safety. The CA stated that at full strength, the total complement of staff will be 107, dedicating 35% of their time to food safety. So far, 58 are in place, with 19 new SFO recruited over the last year and an additional 20 SFO to be recruited over the next 12 months. All new staff since 1 January 2007 must undergo 6 months induction training.

A current review of management structures includes the establishment of a Specialized Food Safety Unit at HQ of SFPA HQ in Clonakilty, CO. Cork, headed by a Sea Port Officer (SPO) and 3-4 SFO, along with a dedicated Food Safety SPO in each of the seven Port Offices.

Action taken.

(20472) The formalisation / documentation of corrective actions and procedures – namely those already drafted and distributed to SFO – and in particular in relation to report issuing should be improved.

The CA provided details of the training undertaken to improve the areas highlighted. In addition, 28 of the staff complement of 58 SFO have completed a specialised Food Safety Programme organised by University College Cork. It is planned that all SFO will participate in this training.

Action taken.

(20473) The deficiencies noted in laboratories carrying out analyses for official and private purposes, including those deficiencies identified by the audits already performed by the FSAI, should be corrected.

Official control of food laboratories are subject to INAB approval for the specific analyses carried out to comply with 91/492/EC and 91/493/EC.

Own checks Laboratories are subject to INAB approval for the specific analyses carried out to comply with 91/492/EC and 91/493/EC. Where approved establishments are using in-house laboratories for own checks, the SFPA will require that these analyses are supplemented by analyses carried out at external INAB approved labs. A list of analytical laboratories used by SFPA, along with their accredited scope, has been given to the Commission. So far, 15 of the 19 laboratories have been accredited, with the remaining four due to be accredited by 2009.

Action taken.

(20474) The DCMNR should check all registered fishing vessels. A solution should be found for the inspection of the factory

SFPA target is to inspect all registered fishing vessels. In 2006, 514 inspections were carried out by DCMNR on 1,100 vessels. CA stated that vessels under 10M in length were not given the same attention as larger ones. The CA confirmed that there were no longer any factory vessels on the Irish Fleet Register requiring

Action taken.




vessel. inspection.

(20476) Drinking water should be used within the meaning of Directive 98/83/EC. Its chlorination should be carefully followed by establishments’ staff and assessed by SFOs in order to prevent any possible risk to public health.

Chlorine dioxide is being used by some establishments to treat ingredient water. It is unclear

(a) what the CA definitions of clean water and clean sea water are,

(b) where these definitions are covered under national legislation,

(c) how this legislation is enforced.

In their comments on the draft country profile, the CA provided the information in the footnote:4


(20477) All deficiencies/shortcomings observed in the establishments visited during the mission should be corrected and the CA should ensure appropriate follow-up.

The CA confirmed that the establishments in question have been visited and followed-up since the FVO Mission and provided a list of such establishments, together with a standard inspection checklist and a copy of a sample inspection report. Confirmation is needed that all the deficiencies or shortcomings observed have actually been rectified.

In progress.

(20478) The MI should put in place their newly drafted work programme in order to comply with the requirements of Directive 91/492/EEC and of Commission Decision 199/313/EC.

The implementation of these requirements should include the correction of the deficiencies identified in 2.2.1 Laboratories of this report.

In 2005, six microbiological testing laboratories were contracted to undertake E. coli testing for classification purposes. To date all laboratories have performed satisfactorily in the UK health protection agency EQA scheme.

In 2006, two laboratories were audited by the NRL. Following one audit, a testing laboratory was excluded from the testing programme because of poor performance. Of the remaining 5 laboratories, four are accredited to ISO 17025 standard for the E coli procedure in shellfish. The remaining laboratory has had a pre-audit inspection by the INAB and expects to gain accreditation in 2007. Two further test labs were to be audited in Summer 2007. The NRL was accredited for E. coli testing in early 2007.

The CA provided the Commission with a list of testing laboratories, an example of a standard contract for micro testing laboratories and the draft Code of Practice on Microbiology and Virology Monitoring.

Action taken.

(20479) The use of alternative methods for the detection of Saxitoxin (PSP) – different from the biological method – should

The MI, in its role as NRL for Ireland, sent data on the use of the Jellet Rapid Test for PSP toxins to the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) on 26 January 2005.

The MI will continue to work with the CRL and other

In progress.

4 (a) Update: potable water’ means water meeting the minimum requirements laid down in Council Directive 98/83/EC

of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption; ‘clean seawater’ means natural, artificial or purified seawater or brackish water that does not contain micro-organisms, harmful substances or toxic marine plankton in quantities capable of directly or indirectly affecting the health quality of food; ‘clean water’ means clean seawater and fresh water of a similar quality; NOTE: Water meeting theses definitions is regarded as being suitable for use in the production and processing of fishery products, and is not injurious to human health. (b) Update: EC Regulation 852/2004 is given effect in respect of fishery products by SI 335 2006: EC (Hygiene of Fishery Products and Fish Feed) Regulations 2006. Directive 98/83/EC is given effect in Ireland by SI 106 of 2007 EC (Drinking Water) Regulations 2007.




only be considered after its recognition, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 12 of Directive 91/492/EEC

(20480) The use of alternative chemical methods for the detection of lipophilic toxins – different from the biological testing method – should be considered only after availability of standards for new analogues of public health significance and validation of its performance characteristics following an internationally agreed protocol, in accordance with the requirements of Commission Decision 2002/225/EC.

international laboratories on the development and validation of alternative testing methods for lipophilic toxins.

The MI will also continue to work with ECVAM, and other international organisations, to refine, reduce and ultimately replace animal assays for all biotoxin groups.

Details of Test Methods in use by the MI for ASP, PSP, and DSP were provided to the Commission. Tests are PSP AOAC Mouse Bioassay (accredited by INAB), DSP 24 hour bioassay CRL harmonised protocol (accredited by INAB), ASP by HPLC with Diode Array Detection (Accredited by INAB)

Current and up to date validation reports were also provided to the Commission for these 3 methods.

(20481) The monitoring of ASP in wild scallops, in particular the transfer of responsibilities from the DCMNR to the private sector should be reviewed according to the requirements of Commission Decision 2002/226/EC.

This recommendation was reviewed by a FSAI/MI/DCMNR (DCMNR now replaced by SFPA) Trilateral meeting on 19 May 2005, when it was agreed that the current system of controls for wild scallops was satisfactory, including the role taken in sampling by the industry.

A COP for the Microbiological Monitoring of Bivalve Mollusc Production Areas has been drafted by a Working Group comprising members of the different stake-holder bodies. The COP includes chapters on sampling, microbiological testing, data handling and storage, risk management, etc. A further paper on Open Water/Wild Shellfish Fisheries has been developed, with specific reference to the Scallop Fishery and testing for ASP. Further clarification is needed on the actual controls carried out on the application of the COP and on action taken in the case of deficiencies being discovered.

In progress.

(20482) The Irish Authorities should undertake the necessary actions in dispatch/purification centres which are not in compliance with the relevant Community requirements.

In particular, inspections of dispatch/purification centres, at regular intervals, should be put in place by the Irish Authorities, to check the performance of end product testing in

SFPA has produced a draft COP on the specific inspection of dispatch and purification centres. The final COP is expected to be ready for the end of 2007. These centres are inspected on a regular basis by SFPA. The issue of end product testing is given particular attention during these inspections.

In progress.




accordance with Chapters V of Directive 91/492/EEC and to assess establishments’ own-checks/HACCP plan in accordance with Commission Decision 94/356/EEC.

(20483) The SFO should inspect each batch of fishery products at the time of landing or before first sale.

SFPA has provided the Commission with its COP covering, inter alia, organoleptic checks on fish at landing or first sale.

Action taken.

(20484) Inspections of Fishery Product establishments should be put in place, at regular intervals, by the Irish Authorities, in particular to check the performance of end product testing in accordance with Chapters V of Directive 91/493/EEC and to assess establishments’ own-checks/HACCP plan in accordance with Commission Decision 94/356/EEC.

SFPA has endeavoured to increase the number of inspections carried out on approved establishments, as well as to ensure that such inspections are more structured and thorough. While a formal annual control plan will not be in place until 2008, the CA has nevertheless carried out 142 inspections on the 190 approved establishments in 2006.

The issue of end product testing/own checks/HACCP plan is be given particular attention during these inspections.

In progress.

3.3. Imports of animals and food of animal origin

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 3 inspections in Ireland in relation to imports of animals and food of animal origin.

Out of a total of 18 recommendations contained in the reports of these inspections, 8 were identified for follow up during the general review mission.

As shown in the following table, 6 recommendations have been classified as "Action taken" and 2 recommendations have been classified as "In progress".

MR 7658/2005 of 23/05/2005 on Import Controls and BIP

REFERENCE NO. AND RECOMMENDATION Findings Assessment

(22631) To review the import control legislation with a view to updating and completing in particular implementation of Regulations (EC) Nos. 1774/2002 and 998/2003, Decision 2002/349/EC and import related EU

The DAFF has confirmed that it supervises compliance with the conditions of licences for waste and burial of waste on a risk basis of between 30% and 100% supervision to ensure compliance. A new inspection report form has been introduced. All annual licences issued for the handling of ICW now include the necessary conditions regarding labelling, commercial documents accompanying consignments and record keeping. DAFF will monitor compliance with these conditions. A new SOP for BIP inspectors covering inter alia EU safeguard

Action taken




safeguard Decisions. decisions has been issued, and a copy of Decision 2002/349/EC has been sent to all BIP and to Customs. The CA has confirmed that manifests of Authorised Consignee Premises had been checked approximately three times per month during 2006 and records filed. The CA has also confirmed that the Automated Entry Process (AEP) used by Customs will be upgraded in the very near future to ensure that all CN codes for products of animal origin will be flagged.

(22632) To update the list of entry points for CITES-consignments for live animals and products of animal origin subject to veterinary checks to be in line with the BIP-list.

The CA undertook to make a further request to the authority responsible for the national legislation (Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government) to update the list of CITES points

In progress

(22633) To update the necessary administrative and other supporting measures to further improve and harmonise the implementation of EU legislation at BIP.

A joint manual of operations for BIP was developed between DAFF and DCMNR in 2006 and a revised version was issued in 2007.

DAF and DCMNR have committed to meeting formally twice a year to augment and co-ordinate communications at local level. It is hoped to finalise a draft protocol on co-operation between the two bodies shortly and the CA has undertaken to send a copy to the Commission once it has been signed.

Furthermore, meetings have been held with Customs and closer co-operation has been agreed. The responses to recommendations 22634 and 22635 are also relevant in response to this recommendation. See also recommendation 22631 regarding the SOP for BIP

In progress

(22634) To improve training for BIP staff and to further develop the system for supervision and monitoring of the operations of BIP.

Extra staff resources have been allocated to BIP duties in Headquarters, Dublin Port and Dublin Airport. A series of training visits took place in 2006 to all BIP, focussing on sampling techniques, correct issuing of CVED, TRACES messages and recent changes to BIP-related legislation. Records of training are now being kept at the BIP. Two official veterinarians attended BIP training as part of the Commission's "Better training for safer food” programme while one official veterinarian attended a training course on Welfare and Transport The FSAI has planned labelling training for BIP officers in 2007. In relation to supervision and monitoring, all 3 BIP were audited in 2006 and 2007.

Action taken

(22635) To further improve the development of co-operation with the involved authorities in particular for the identification and selection of consignments of veterinary interest passing through BIPs in view of the requirements foreseen in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 and Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EC)

The CA has confirmed that cross-agency meetings take place as necessary and that DAFF has access to Customs databases upon request. Specific information relevant to imports of animals and animal products are routinely shared. Customs are notified by DAFF of all Safeguard Decisions. Customs have also given an undertaking to ensure that all relevant CN codes are flagged in the AEP (see also recommendation 22631). DAF and DCMNR meet formally twice a year to augment and co-ordinate communications at local level.

Action taken




No 282/2004 - and the correction of the relevant deficiencies noted. (22637) To ensure that supervision of storage meat, labelled with an EU health mark, is in line with requirements of Directive 64/433/EEC.

Veterinary supervision in the premises concerned has been reviewed and arrangements are in place with veterinary inspectors of the local authority and EHO of the HSE to jointly carry out hygiene inspections of these premises. DAF issued a SOP in 2005 entitled “Veterinary Procedural Notice 4/2005 - Implementation of the Veterinary Checks Directive in approved establishments” focussing on the documentary and physical checks to be carried out on products going into cold stores. The FSAI has written to all official control agencies requesting information on cold stores and other selected premises. On completion of this survey, the FSAI plans to host meetings to discuss its findings with agencies involved and decide on appropriate supervisory arrangements. This action is scheduled for 2007.

Action taken

(22639) To rectify the deficiencies noted for facilities, equipment, hygiene, documentation, registration and records for all BIP visited

The CA has confirmed that BIP now receive part 1 of CVED in accordance with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 and Regulation (EC) 282/2004 An instruction was sent to all BIP requiring training records to be kept on file at the BIP. Hygiene programmes at all BIP has been reviewed with the assistance of experts from DAFF public health staff and a new on cleaning and disinfection of BIP has been prepared The residue control plan was sent to the BIP in 1007 and future annual control plans will be sent out at the start of each calendar year. Manual registration for laboratory checks has been brought in line with the requirements of Decision 97/794 by the introduction of a revised sample request form. The following specific actions in the three BIP have also been taken: Shannon Airport The following are in place: Cages and source of heating for “O”. Sampling equipment and seals. Equipment and documentation in second office. Technical equipment for treatment of animals. New fridge in inspection room for products. Dublin Airport Tropical Fish checked at BIP. Crush repaired and hygiene issue addressed in new protocol. Technical equipment for treatment of animals in place Dublin Port Instructions issued that seal checks should form only part of identity checks when model EU health certificate contains specific reference to seal number.

Action taken.

(22641) To ensure that veterinary checks are carried out as recorded, and that veterinary decisions taken are in accordance with provisions of Directives 91/496/EC, 97/78/EC, 96/23/EC and

A monitoring plan for imported consignments to be sampled for residues, hormones and pathogens as foreseen in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 was sent to the Commission. See recommendation 22633 regarding manual of operations which includes a SOP for veterinary checks at the BIP. All BIP have access to hard copies of the current BIP-related legislation, which is kept updated via a written SOP.

Action taken




the related Regulations and Decisions.

See also recommendation 22634 on internal audits to check the correct application of the relevant provisions.

3.4. Feedingstuffs and animal nutrition

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 2 inspections in Ireland in relation to feedingstuffs and animal nutrition.

All 10 recommendations made in these reports have either received a satisfactory response or have been followed up in other inspections. No recommendation was therefore identified for further follow up during the general review mission.

3.5. TSE/ABP

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 10 inspections in Ireland in relation to TSE/ABP.


As shown in the following tables, 5 recommendations have been classified as "Action taken" and 2 recommendations have been classified as "In progress".

MR 7119/2004 of 11/10/2004 on Animal by-products


(23562) To take steps to ensure that the responsibilities of all the CA involved in the ABP chain are clearly understood.

DAF is the national CA for ABP and has set up an inter-agency working group to facilitate communication with authorised officers in other agencies, such as HSE, LA and Department of Environment, who are involved in the official controls of ABP in food establishments. This group meets on a bi-monthly basis. FSAI participates as an observer.

Action taken.

(23563) To produce administrative provisions where appropriate in order to ensure official controls along the ABP chain.

The CA confirmed that SOP were prepared and issued to staff members in the CA and guidelines were produced and circulated to the industry in respect of biogas and composting plants, which have been approved in accordance with Regulation (EC) 1774/2002. Action on the approval of wool stores has commenced.

In progress.

MR 7704/2005 of 10/10/2005 on TSE in sheep and goats


(22430) To introduce the system for identification and registration of goats as required by Regulation (EC) 21/2004.

The National Goat Identification System (NGIS) is in place since 2005 and all goat herds are registered on a central database.

Action taken.


MR 7704/2005 of 10/10/2005 on TSE in sheep and goats


(22431) To ensure that sampling of sheep is representative to each region in accordance with Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

The CA is carrying out a study of under-representation of sheep sampling in certain northern counties. This will also look again at sampling in slaughterhouses. The study is expected to be completed by Autumn 2007.

The CA has also reminded flock owners of their legal obligations to dispose of fallen stock.

In progress.

(22432) To ensure that the sampling of goats is in line with the requirements of Annex III, to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001.

An awareness campaign directed at all registered goat herd owners was carried out in 2006, through the issue of letters advising them of their legal obligations in the matter of the disposal of fallen stock. Similar letters were sent to PVP. Audits of 16% of registered goat herds were performed in 2006.

Action taken.

(22433) To undertake a further awareness campaign as required by Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 to ensure farmers are aware of the clinical signs of and the need to report TSE suspects.

A fully co-ordinated scrapie information program was instigated in 2006. Advice leaflets were produced and circulated to all DVO, where they were available to flock owners. The leaflets were also distributed at national and some local agricultural shows, and sent to PVP. They provided advice to flock owners on the clinical signs of scrapie and on their obligations to notify the CA of any suspect scrapie animals on their holdings.

Action taken.

(22434) To introduce a breeding programme for resistance to TSE in sheep as required by Decision 2003/100/EC

This recommendation has been overtaken by subsequent legislation rescinding the requirement for MS to have a Compulsory Breeding Programme. The CA confirmed that the Voluntary Breeding Programme will continue as before.

Action taken.

3.6. Veterinary medicines and residues

Since 1999 the FVO has completed one inspection in Ireland in relation to veterinary medicines and residues.


As shown in the following tables, both recommendations have been classified as "Action taken".

MR 9049/2003 of 20/10/2003 on Residues


(16361) To enhance and document the controls on authorisation and distribution of VMP and medicated pre-mixes, in order to ensure compliance with EC legislation. With regard to aquaculture, to include such controls in the existing inspections.

The CA issued instructions to the 28 DVO to carry out annual inspections of all veterinary practices, to ensure that PVP are complying with their obligations under the Veterinary Practice Act of 2005, which includes the requirements to keep records and to issue prescriptions in all cases. From these records, farms are selected for follow-up inspections by DVO staff, where the farmers’ records are checked. Such checks are also carried out during routine on-farm checks for welfare purposes. With regard to medicated premixes, the CA amended the Animal Remedies and Medicated Feedingstuffs Regulations 1994 by SI 365/2003 in order to enforce legal controls in this area. This was followed by an inspection of farmers engaged in the manufacture

Action taken.


MR 9049/2003 of 20/10/2003 on Residues


of medicated feedingstuffs. Regarding aquaculture, the CA confirmed that the SFPA includes these controls in their inspections.

(16362) To reinforce controls on the illegal use of unauthorised substances; in particular with regard to malachite green, to take all appropriate measures to ensure that it is not used any longer in aquaculture production.

On-farm sampling specifically for malachite green and its metabolite leuco- malachite green has increased. Currently, a total of 85 surveillance samples per year are tested for malachite green, at harvest and other stages of production in freshwater. No non-compliant results have been detected since 2004. The MI has acquired the necessary equipment to carry out screening for malachite green.

Action taken.

3.7. Foodstuffs, food hygiene and GMO

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 3 inspections in Ireland in relation to foodstuffs and food hygiene.

All 6 recommendations made in these reports have either received a satisfactory response or have been followed up in other inspections. No recommendation was therefore identified for further follow up during the general review mission. 3.8. Imports of food of plant origin

Since 1999 the FVO has completed one inspection in Ireland in relation to imports of food of plant origin.

Out of a total of 10 recommendations contained in the report of this inspection, 2 were identified for follow up during the general review mission.

As shown in the following table, both recommendations have been classified as "In progress".

MR 8595/2002 of 11/03/2002 on Import controls of plants


(10191) To ensure that the inspections, where they are documentary and identity checks, must be made at the same place and the same time as the other administrative formalities concerning import, including customs formalities, as required by Article 13(8) para.3 of Council Directive 2000/29/EC.

The CA confirmed that a New Customs Automated Process was expected to be introduced in August 2007. This would enable the identification of all appropriate material. In addition a draft Memorandum of Understanding between the Customs authorities and the Department of Agriculture has been drawn up to clarify respective roles and highlight Article 13 requirements.

In progress

(10193) To ensure that adequate facilities and equipment are available at the places where phytosanitary checks are conducted, to enable a

The CA has confirmed that a dedicated premises has been identified for Plant Health portal inspections and is in the process of being upgraded to the Plant Health BIP requirements.

In progress.


MR 8595/2002 of 11/03/2002 on Import controls of plants


meticulous inspection to be carried out as required by Article 13(1)(a) of Council Directive 2000/29/EC. This should at least include adequate lighting and areas for inspection as laid down by Commission Directive 98/22/EC and equipment to allow for access to, and if necessary, unloading of containerised consignments.

3.9. Plant Protection Products

Since 1999 the FVO has completed one inspection in Ireland in relation to plant protection products. Out of a total of 10 recommendations contained in reports of these inspections, 2 were identified for follow up during the general review mission.

As shown in the following table, both recommendations have been classified as "Action taken".

MR 9246/2003 of 15/09/2003 on Pesticides – marketing and use


(15091) Existing authorisations should be reviewed in cases where new EC MRL have been set, to ensure that the authorised uses reflect the new MRL

The database has been expanded to include Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) details for each Irish authorised PPP and is now operational. The expanded database will be used to check compatibility of new MRL with current Irish GAP.

The laboratory database cross references the GAP database with the analytical results obtained and highlights instances where a pesticide residue found in Irish produce does not correspond with an authorised Irish use.

Action taken.

(15094) The competent authorities of Ireland should recommence sampling and formulation analysis of plant protection products and check an adequate number of specifications. The authorities should consider drafting procedures for sampling and analysis

The laboratory for the analysis PPP has been operational since September 2006. A total of 34 PPP were analysed in 2006 and a full work programme for sampling and analysis of PPP is in place for 2007. By June 2007 some 33 PPP had been analysed and the results submitted for 4x CIPAC collaborative studies.

The relevant SOP have been prepared and are in place

Action taken.

3.10. Animal welfare

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 5 inspections in Ireland in relation to animal welfare.


Out of a total of 25 recommendations contained in reports of these inspections, 10 were identified for follow up during the general review mission.

As shown in the following tables, 4 recommendations have been classified as "Action taken", 5 recommendations have been classified as "In progress" and one recommendation has been classified as “Action still required”. MR 8052/2006 of 29/09/2006 on Animal welfare on farms


(27310) The CA should ensure that there is efficient and effective co-ordination and co-operation between authorities carrying out official controls, as required by Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004, in particular in relation to those inspecting holdings with laying hens.

DAF has set up the Poultry Liaison Group with the purpose of developing a strategy to advance cross reporting arrangements on laying hen welfare issues between the Agricultural Inspectorate and the Veterinary Inspectorate. The following terms of reference have been agreed: 1.list the respective checking functions /responsibilities of each unit 2.state the legislation under which each unit is operating 3.ensure that officers are appropriately authorised under legislation 4.Clarify where functions of the different units overlap The Group had its first meeting in August 2007.

Action taken.

(27311) The CA should ensure that all staff performing official controls receive appropriate training enabling them to carry out inspections in a consistent and competent manner as required by Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004, in particular, regarding the requirements for alternative systems for laying hens in Article 4 of Directive 99/74/EC.

Training within DAFF is being revised and updated. Training courses for inspectors were organised in April 2007 at which the specific requirements for alternative laying hens were addressed. The veterinary and agricultural inspectorates have commenced work on ensuring consistent interpretations of the standards set out in the relevant Directives concerning laying hens and are developing improved cross reporting arrangements and transfer of information between the two inspectorates.

Action taken.

(27312) The CA should ensure that adequate verification procedures are in place to ensure the effectiveness of controls, as required by Article 8(3) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004. In particular that following the detection of deficiencies, written notification of the corrective actions are provided to the owner or keeper of the animals concerned, as laid down in Article 9(3) and Article 54(3) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 and the outcome of inspections

Systems are being developed to provide for enhanced verification of the effectiveness of the controls. This aspect was included in the training courses in April 2007 and at the regional management meetings. Improved supervision and monitoring of both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the inspections is being put in place at the various levels in the supervisory system. Non-compliances will be notified to the keeper and the corrective actions required will be in a written format. A revised procedures manual is being produced and will be available to the inspectorate on the intranet. Work has commenced on improving the recording and reporting of the outcome of inspections, as required by Decision 2000/50/EC and its successor Decision 2006/778/EC.A new computer system, AFITS, is being developed to ensure compliance with the requirements of Decision 2006/778/EC.

Action taken.


MR 8052/2006 of 29/09/2006 on Animal welfare on farms


are correctly recorded and reported, as required by Decision 2000/50/EC.(27313) The CA should ensure that internal or external audits are organised to include controls of animal welfare, as required by point 6 of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004

All activities undertaken by the CA, including all control activities are subject to internal audit by the central CA Internal Audit Unit. However, recognising the additional requirements imposed by Article 4 (6) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004, the CA is in the process of enhancing its internal audit function with the assignment of additional specific technical audit personnel. Up to now, additional resources have been assigned to the veterinary public health and the laboratory areas. This initiative is being expanded on a phased basis to all controls, including on-farm welfare controls. It is expected that this process will be substantially completed by the end of 2007 and will include animal welfare audits in the 2008 audit programme.

In progress.

(27314) The CA should ensure that the national legislation concerning tethering of sows and gilts is amended in line with the requirements of Article 3(3) of Directive 91/630/EEC.

National legislation is being amended and is expected to be completed by end June 2007.

In progress.

(27315) The CA should ensure that official controls shall include control schemes operated by the producers themselves, as required by Article 10(2) (a) of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004.

New legislation on the marketing standards for eggs was to come into place in Summer 2007. This necessitates the revision of inspection report forms to accommodate the new legislation and other matters. Consideration will be given at this stage to the question of incorporating a check on the operator’s own control schemes and how this check will be recorded. Bord Bia, the Irish food board, intends to roll out the new Egg Quality Assurance Scheme to operators in autumn 2007.

In progress.

(27316) The CA should ensure that a risk analysis is included as part of the programming of official controls of animal welfare on farms, as required by Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004.

Control selection procedures are being updated to formally incorporate risk analysis principles into the selection of farms for annual inspections. This was covered in the training courses in April 2007. Instructions will focus on the criteria to be followed in risk assessing farms for the individual species. A centralised approach will be adopted. It is proposed that the new AFITS computer system will list at-risk farms. The procedural manual will be updated to include risk management. The process will be introduced on a pilot basis in a number of administrative regions to verify appropriateness of the risk parameters selected – with the intention of full implementation of a new revised system for 2008.

In progress.

(27317) The CA should ensure that documented procedures for the performance of inspections are developed, as required by Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 and that these are sufficiently comprehensive to include all aspects of Directives 91/630/EEC and

Guidelines and inspection form checklists have been reviewed and are being amended to ensure that all aspects of the relevant Directives are covered, particularly regarding the provision of material for manipulation and investigation for pigs and provision of bulky or high fibre food and high energy food for pregnant sows or gilts in Directive 91/630 and appropriate cage and perch facilities in Directive 99/74/EC. The question of the placing of perches was covered in the training courses in April 2007 and at Regional Veterinary Management Meetings in September 2007. The documented procedures relating to this aspect have been requested from the CA.

A letter was sent by the Commission to the CA on 25 May 2007,

Action taken.


MR 8052/2006 of 29/09/2006 on Animal welfare on farms


99/74/EC. clarifying the issue relating to the correct placing of perches. In their comments on the draft country profile and subsequent correspondence, the CA confirmed that their interpretation on the placing of perches was in line with the Commission's.

(27318) The CA should ensure that changes in the register of establishments keeping laying hens are notified and the register is updated, as required by Article 1(4) of Directive 2002/4/EC.

The register of egg producers and packing centres has been placed on the CA’s intranet. The data was correct at the time of setting up the register but may now need updating, in particular regarding changes in capacity. The CA undertook to examine this with a view to ensuring that the register meets the requirements of the welfare legislation.

In progress.

(27319) The CA should ensure that cage area for laying hens, as laid down in Article 5 (1) (1) of Directive 99/74/EC, is also an area which provides the minimum height required by Article 5 (1) (4) of Directive 99/74/EC

The CA had stated that they were satisfied that the extended front cages provide additional usable space at head height and that the birds make use of this additional extra space effectively. A letter was sent by the Commission to the CA on 25 May 2007, advising them that the extra space provided by the extended front is not included in the calculation of the floor area and stocking densities are calculated accordingly. The CA said that whole issue was under discussion internally. No reply has yet been received.

Action still required. The Commission has initiated specific follow up measures in the case of this recommendation

3.11. Plant health

Since 1999 the FVO has completed 2 inspections in Ireland in relation to plant health.

All 3 recommendations made in the reports of these inspections have either received a satisfactory response or have been followed up in other inspections. No recommendation was therefore identified for further follow up during the general review mission.


ANNEX I – ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS AND SPECIAL TERMS

ACRONYM DESCRIPTION AFCG Animal Feedingstuffs Control Group AFIT Agricultural Field Inspection Training (database) AFRC Ashtown Food Research Centre AHCS Animal Health Computer System AHD Animal Health Division AHWI Animal Health and Welfare Inspectorate AI Agricultural Inspectorate AIM Animal Identification Movement system AO Agricultural Officer AWD Animal Welfare Division AWIS Animal Welfare Inspection System (database) BIP Border Inspection Post(s) BSE Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy BTL Blood Testing Laboratory CA Competent Authority CCS Corporate Customer System CEO Chief Executive Officer CES Customs Division of the Revenue Commissioners CI Chief Inspector CMCL Central Meat Control Laboratory CMMS Cattle Movement Monitoring System CN Customs Tariff Number COP Code of Practice CP Contingency Plan CPL Central Plant Laboratory CPSD Crop Production and Safety Division

CRL Community Reference Laboratory CSF Classical Swine Fever

CVED Common veterinary entry document for products of animal origin and for live animals

CVRL Central Veterinary Research Laboratory CVO Chief Veterinary Officer DAFF Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food DCMNR Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources DEHLG Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government DG SANCO Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection DI Dairy Inspectorate DoHC Department of Health and Children DPI Dairy Produce Inspectorate DRLD Dairy Regions and Laboratory Division DSL Dairy Science Laboratories DVO District Veterinary Offices


ACRONYM DESCRIPTION EHO Environmental Health Officer EHS Environmental Health Service EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPI Egg and Poultry Inspectorate EPS Ewe Premium Scheme EMEA European Medical Agency ERAD Eradication of Animal Disease Division EU European Union FAWAC Farm Animal Welfare Advisory Council FBO Food/Feed Business Operations (Operator) FD Feedingstuffs Division FFGPPD Feedingstuffs, Fertilisers, Grain, Pigs and Poultry Division FI Feedingstuffs Inspectorate FMD Foot and Mouth Disease FSAI Food Safety Authority of Ireland FSD Forest Service Division FSLS Food Safety Laboratory Service FVO Food and Veterinary Office GHP Good Hygiene Practice GMO Genetically Modified Organism(s) GN Guidance Notes HACCP Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point HPHD Horticulture And Plant Health Division HPSC Health Protection Surveillance Centre HSE Health Service Executive ICW International Catering Waste IMAP Internet Mapping and Area Payments IMB Irish Medicines Board INAB Irish National Accreditation Board ISO International Standards Organisation LA Local Authorities LAVS Local Authority Veterinary Service LAVO Local Authority Veterinary Officers MANCP Multi-Annual National Control Plan MAT Microsopic Analysis Test MI Marine Institute MoU Memorandum of Understanding MPD Meat Policy Division MRL Maximum Residue Level NCA National Consumer Agency NCP National Control Plan ND Newcastle Disease NDCC National Disease Control Centre NPITS National Pig Identification and Tracing System


ACRONYM DESCRIPTION NRCP National Residue Control Plan NRL National Reference Laboratory NSIS National Sheep Identification System NSAI National Standards Authority of Ireland NCA National Consumer Agency OFML Official Food Microbiological Laboratory OJ Official Journal OU Organics Unit OV Official Veterinarian (Veterinary Inspector) PAL Public Analyst Laboratories PAP Processed animal protein PAS Public Appointments Service PCI Pesticide Control Inspectorate PCL DAF Pesticide Control Laboratory PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction PCS Pesticide Control Service PEHO Principal Environment Health Officer PHI Plant Health Inspectorate PHL Plant Health Laboratory PHMS Public Health Medical Service PPP Plant Protection Products PVP Private Veterinary Practitioner(s) QMS Quality Management System RASFF Rapid Alert System for Feed and Food REU Regulatory and Enforcement Unit of the PCS RPII Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland RSVI Regional Superintending Veterinary Inspector RVL Regional Veterinary Laboratories SAO Supervisory Agriculture Officer SC Service Contracts SCS Suspect Collection Service SFO Sea Fisheries Officer SFPA Sea-Fisheries Protection Authority S.I. Statutory Instrument SIU Special Investigation Unit SL State Laboratory SOP Standard Operating Procedure(s) SPO Sea Port Officer SPS Single Farm Payment Scheme SRM Specified Risk Material SSVI Senior Superintending Veterinary Inspector STL Seed Testing Laboratory STS Seed Testing Station SVI Superintending Veterinary Inspector


ACRONYM DESCRIPTION SVS State Veterinary Service TAO Technical Agricultural Officers TC Third Countries

TRACES TRAde Control and Expert System introduced by Commission Decision 2004/292/EC

TSE Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TVI Temporary Veterinary Inspector VI Veterinary Inspector VMD Veterinary Medicines Division VMP Veterinary medicinal products VPHI Veterinary Public Health Inspectorate


ANNEX II – OVERVIEW OF STAFF RESOURCES

Total means the total number of Full Time Equivalent Staff (FTE) involved in controls on food safety, animal and plant health and animal welfare in the relevant control bodies. FTE Staff Working in Official Food Control, as of December 2005

FTE

Food Safety Authority of Ireland 82 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 455 Health Services Executive 398 Local Authorities veterinary inspectors 37 Marine Institute 30 Official Food Microbiology Laboratories 78 Public Analyst Laboratories 67 Office of Director of Consumer Affairs 4 Public Health Medical Services Staff ~ Total 1,155 SFPA (Staff numbers from 2007)

82

Additional Staff Working in Official Food Control,

Temporary Veterinary Inspectors - Local Authorities 134 Temporary Veterinary Inspectors - Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Meat) 956 Other DAFF Inspectors 17 DAFF Central Veterinary Research Laboratory 71 Total 1,178


ANNEX III – TRAINING SYSTEMS

Training and development in 2005 of staff involved in controls on food safety, animal and plant health and animal welfare.

DAFF Division Name of course No. Courses

Total No. Participants

Total No. Staff Days

BIPs TRACES 4 20 10 EC Legislation 3 3 3CMCL CVRL 0 0 0Dairy Science Lab

Validation Seminar on Microbiological Methods 1 1 2

Fire Training Course 1 14 14 SAP Training Course 1 4 4

Seminar for Dairy Staff organised by Dairy Inspectorate 3 28 56

Seminar for Inspectorate Staff organised by Chief Inspector 3 8 16

Safefood - Method validation 1 2 4 Safefood - Auditing 1 1 2Egg Division HACCP Training Course 1 12 1 Farm Buildings 1 5 1 Health and Safety 1 12 1 Group Training 2 12 2Food Laboratory 0 0 0Meat Division Poultry welfare officer training 2 4 8

Process hygiene through micro sampling 2 55 110

Food Safety Seminar Belfield Dobrenov 1 1 18 18

FSAI Food Labelling Course 1 82 82 Practical pathology 1 13 13 Veterinary Induction 2 5 10 VOA 2005 MEAT 1 21 21 Veterinary Lab audit course 2 10 20 USDA HACCP Course 1 1 10 Audit Training 1 11 33 Lead Auditor Course for Labs 1 9 9Milk Division FSAI Labelling course 1 23 23 FSAI Hygiene Package course 1 23 46 SVI HACCP Training 1 7 21 Hygiene Pack Seminar 1 18 18 Dept Inspectors Course, Carlow 1 15 15Pesticide Control Service Basic LC-MS/MS Training 1 2 4Regional Veterinary Lab 0 0 0Residue Monitoring Programme

RELAY workshop - Chemical Residues in Food 2 3 7.5

Zoonoses 0 0 0


DCMNR Name of Course

No. Courses



Seafood Technology Course UCC 1 9 324 HSE Name of Course

No. Courses



Environmental Health Conferences 25 80 355.5FSAI Training 53 337 610Further Education (e.g. Dip, Cert, MSc) 14 39 150Information Seminar 80 446.5 748.5In-House Training / Induction Training 71 450 1086.5IT Training 45 188 311.5Other 3 13 39QMS Training 14 57 68Skills Development / Technical Training 80 342 551.5

HSE / OFML Name of Course

No. Courses



Accreditation / Auditor Training 7 8 14FSAI Training / Seminar 5 4 6Further Education (e.g. Dip, Cert, MSc) 10 10 42Health & Safety Training 5 30 45.5In-House Training / Induction Training 4 37 173.5IT Training 22 19 83Other 3 6 25Skills Development / Technical Training 38.5 73 98

HSE /PAL Name of Course

No. Courses



Accreditation / Auditor Training 2 3 1.5FSAI Training / Seminar 5 3 9Further Education (e.g. Dip, Cert, MSc) 9 12 74Health & Safety Training 4 6 9.5In-House Training / Induction Training 18 33 77IT Training 2 4 11.5Other 5 9 59Skills Development / Technical Training 39 50 92.5


Local Authorities Name of Course No. Courses

Total No. Participants Total No. Staff Days

Animal By Products 5 6 6Animal Welfare Course 20 26 54Audit Course 3 3 13Avian Influenza 0 1 0.5Cert. in Food Tech 1 1 2Communications Training 1 2 4Conference 12 31 28Conflict Resolution 1 2 2DAF Training 1 4 8Hygiene Package 1 1 1IPA 4 4 8IPA/LAVS Annual Seminar 1 1 2Planning 1 1 1PMDS Training 1 1 1Teagasc Training 1 1 1V.P.H. Course London University 1 1 0Workshop 4 5 7Zoonoses Training 3 3 2.5Microbiology Training 17 22 45Camplyobacter Conference 8 10 10EU Science of Food 1 1 2Proprietor training 2 2 2Advanced ECDL / Computer Training 2 6 4.5LAVS Planning Day 1 1 1.5Labelling 3 6 5Strategic Planning 1 1 1Abattoir Training 3 3 3RAPID Hygiene & VERIFY-EYE Technology 1 12 4EPA 1 1 1Cork Vet Public Health Lab 1 1 1Food Safety 1 1 2FSAI MISC Training 3 1 3LAVS Training 2 1 1.5Staff Meetings 2 5 2Regional Hosp. Waterford 1 3 3Ongoing Training for LIMS Nov. 05 1 4 8FSAI/LAVS 1 1 1

Marine Institute Sub Section

No. Courses



Various 60 232 364.5

HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL...

Documents

Transcript of HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL...