Hawthorne experiments

15
Hawthorne Experiments b Elton Mayo P.ROHITH KRISHNASAI 161433 Pgdmtopics.blogsp ot.in

Transcript of Hawthorne experiments

Page 1: Hawthorne experiments

Hawthorne Experiments by Elton Mayo

P.ROHITH KRISHNASAI161433

Pgdmtopics.blogspot.in

Page 2: Hawthorne experiments

Who is Elton Mayo?

Industrial Researcher Psychologist and Sociologist

12/26/1880 – 9/7/1949

Active Australian Psychologist

Page 3: Hawthorne experiments

Mayo's Contribution….

Human Relations Movement

The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization (1933)

Training Within Industry Supervisor Training

Page 4: Hawthorne experiments

Hawthorne Experiments…?

Page 5: Hawthorne experiments

The experiments conducted in four parts Illumination StudiesRelay Assembly Test

Experiments Mass Interview Program Bank Wiring Observation Group

Page 6: Hawthorne experiments

Illumination Studies 1924-1927 Funded by General Electric

Conducted by The National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academy of Sciences with engineers from MIT

Measured Light Intensity vs. Worker Output

Result : Higher worker productivity and satisfaction at all light levels

Conclusions: Light intensity has no conclusive effect on output

Concept of “Hawthorne Effect” was created

Page 7: Hawthorne experiments
Page 8: Hawthorne experiments
Page 9: Hawthorne experiments

Relay Assembly Test Experiments 1927-1929

Manipulated factors of production to measure effect on output:

Pay Incentives

Length of Work Day & Work Week

Use of Rest Periods

Company Sponsored Meals

Results: Higher output and greater employee satisfaction

Conclusions: Positive effects – workers’ output will increase as a response to attention

Strong social bonds were created within the test group. Workers are influenced by need for recognition, security and sense of belonging

Page 10: Hawthorne experiments

Relay Assembly Room #2Relay Assembly Room #2

• 1928-1929• Measured effect on output with compensation rates

• Special observation room• 1st Session- Relay Assemblers changed from departmental

incentive to small group incentive• 2nd Session - Adjusted back to large group incentive

Page 11: Hawthorne experiments
Page 12: Hawthorne experiments

Mica Splitting Test Group 1928-1931 Measured output with changes to work conditions only:

Special Observation Room Length of Work Day Use of Rest Periods Workers stayed on established Piece-rate compensation

Result: Productivity increased by 15% over standard output base

Conclusions: Productivity is affected by non-pay considerations Social dynamics are a basis of worker performance

Page 13: Hawthorne experiments

Plant Interview Program

1925-1927 – Objective Questions Work Conditions Work Relationships Yes/No Answers

1928-1932 – Conversational / Non-directive Attentive Sympathetic Listening Concern for personal needs Increased in time from 30-90 minutes

Page 14: Hawthorne experiments

Bank Wiring Observation Group

• 1931-1932• Limited changes to work conditions

• Segregated work area• No Management Visits• Supervision would remain the same• Observer would record data only – no interaction with

workers Result:

• No appreciable changes in output

Page 15: Hawthorne experiments

THANK YOU..!