Hawaiian Electric Grid Support Utility Interactive (GSUI ... overview - phase...
Transcript of Hawaiian Electric Grid Support Utility Interactive (GSUI ... overview - phase...
Hawaiian Electric Grid Support Utility Interactive (GSUI) Inverter Pilot – Preliminary Findings
Andy Hoke, PhD, PE May 23, 2018
Presentation to the Hawaiian Electric Advanced Inverter Function Working Group
NREL | 2
NREL: Peter Gotseff, Nick Wunder, Julieta Giraldez, Courtney Pailing HECO: Earle Ifuku, Tom Aukai, Reid Sasaki, Reid Ueda, Vivian Paek, Claudia Rapkoch, Wil Lum/Meter Shop, Dixson Lau, Brendan Bailey
Contributors
NREL | 3
• Hawaii has more distributed PV than any other U.S. state. • DERs play a major part in the plan for 100% renewables by 2045 • Current levels of PV result in steady-state voltage issues in some cases • Communication to DERs is typically proprietary or non-existent • Near-term solution: autonomous inverter-based grid support • Pilot focus: Volt-var, fixed power factor, and volt-watt for steady-state
voltage regulation
Motivation
NREL | 4
• Objective: Field validation of inverter-based voltage regulation functions o Investigate impacts on feeder voltages (mainly secondaries) o Investigate curtailment impacts on PV kWh production o Validate VROS project feeder models with field data o Confirm that there are no undesired interactions among inverters or between inverters and utility
equipment
• Functions under test: o Volt-var control (VVC) o Volt-watt control (VWC) o Non-unity fixed power factor (FPF) operation o Combination of VVC and VWC
• NEM customers offered ability to connect without waiting for secondary system upgrade in exchange for participating in the pilot
Project Overview
NREL | 5
• Hawaiian Electric Company – Oahu • NREL • Inverter manufacturers selected based on the choices of the customers who volunteered:
o SolarEdge o Enphase o Both manufacturers provided valuable technical support
• PV installers selected based on the choices of the customers who volunteered: o Alternate Energy o Creative Energy o ECO Solar o Hawaii Energy Connection o Island Pacific Energy o Sunetric
• Customers o 15 active, plus others providing data only o Two “cluster” sites (i.e., more than one advanced inverter plus legacy PV on a single secondary transformer) o In process of adding additional ~20 CGS customers in 2nd phase expansion o Four customers identified to continue to 2nd phase expansion
Entities involved
NREL | 6
• > 100 “Stuck” NEM customers invited in January 2017 o Most did not have to pay for an upgrade so had little motivation
• 15 customers participating • All residential, on various Oahu feeders
o Not enough customers on any one feeder to see feeder-level voltage impacts • All were legacy NEM customers that required a secondary upgrade and agreed to switch to
Advanced Inverters • 2 clusters of customers on same transformer
o Each cluster has multiple legacy PV systems and 2-3 new advanced inverter systems o Irradiance sensors installed at each cluster
Customers
NREL | 7
• Irradiance: 1-second intervals (selected locations only) • Inverter measurements: V, P, Q, pf, frequency, etc at inverter terminals
o String inverters: 1-second intervals; Microinverters: 5-minute intervals • AMI: V, P, Q at customer meter; 1-minute intervals • Grid2020: V, P, Q on LV side of transformer; 1-minute intervals • Feeder SCADA data (V, P, Q, PF, LTC setting)
Data collection points
Distribution transformer
~
Inverter AC & DC Irradiance AMIGrid2020Substation SCADA
NREL | 8
• Developed a remote inverter control and data collection system • Required significant custom effort • External power source required
• Various communication issues requiring multiple field visits • Communication intermittency • Not all PV systems capable of remote configuration
• Operational costs to set up communications systems are significant; the methods used here may not be economically scalable
Communications
Cradlepoint cellular router with LAN (CAT5) connection to inverter. Allows remote TCP/IP access to inverter
using SunSpec Modbus TCP
120 V power for modem RTU interfaces between cell router and rooftop solar irradiance sensor
NREL | 9
Data collection, storage, and visualization platform
NREL | 10
Example of site with high correlation between irradiance and voltage - 4/23/18
• Cluster 1: Volt-var + volt-watt mode
• This is the second-highest voltage location in the pilot
• M3 circuit - Long shared overhead secondary
• Voltage peaks below 1.06 pu this day (i.e. volt-watt not active)
• Minimal impact on PV production
• DC/AC ratio is 1.2 (fairly typical)
• Vars absorbed when V>1.03, as expected.
• Inverter power still ~3.8 kW (rated P)
Solar clearly driving
secondary voltages
• V peaks at 1.056 pu • Irradiance at 1.1
kW/m2, 110% of “maximum”
NREL | 11
Example of site with low correlation between irradiance and voltage - 4/23/18
• Cluster 2: Volt-var + volt-watt mode
• This is a more typical location
• Circuit A - Newer underground secondary
• Two of three GSUI inverters shown
• Issue is the transformer loading and not voltage
No impact on PV production
Voltage stays about the
same regardless of
PV output
V peaks at 1.033 pu
Volt-var barely active
NREL | 12
Secondary voltage rise, as modeled in VROS report
• For customers with highest voltage, rise often occurs mostly on secondary conductor
• Shown is a worst-case extremely high-penetration secondary from VROS simulations. (Highest voltage in pilot is about 1.08 pu.)
• Volt-var (or FPF) can only do so much on such a secondary.
• In such cases, distributed VAr sinks/sources (e.g. Varentec) will have similar limitations on effectiveness
Voltage rise across transformer
Voltage rise on secondary conductor
Volt-var is great for transformer voltage rise, but not resistive rise on conductor
Volta
ge, p
.u.
NREL | 13
Initial output: quantify behind-the-meter voltage rise
• Current from inverter creates voltage change as it flows to meter: ΔVbtm = I*Zbtm • When in volt-var or volt-watt mode, most DER today respond to the voltage at their terminals (PoC)
• May differ from voltage at meter (PCC) • When in volt-var or volt-watt mode the change in output (real or reactive power) will be affected by
voltage rise behind the meter • VArs won’t mitigate ΔVbtm much because wires are mainly resistive (not inductive)
• This will affect the impact of volt-var and volt-watt both on the feeder and on PV energy production
InverterDistribution primary (and rest of grid)
Distribution transformer
Z2nd ~ ZDCZgrid
Meter
Zbtm
PV / DC source
Wires between meter and
inverter AC terminals
- +ΔVbtm
NREL | 14
Sample ΔVbtm for a string inverter
Data from 2 fairly sunny days:
2017 timeAug 05 Aug 06 Aug 07
0100200300400500600700800900
10001100120013001400
Irrad
ianc
e (W
/m2
)
Customer PN-15-02262
2017 timeAug 05, 00:00 Aug 05, 12:00 Aug 06, 00:00 Aug 06, 12:00 Aug 07, 00:00
236
238
240
242
244
246
Volta
ge (V
olts
)
Customer PN-15-03853
Inverter V
AMI V
Aug 06, 2017 time12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 15:30 16:00
238
240
242
244
246
Volta
ge (V
olts
)
Customer PN-15-03853
Inverter V
AMI V
SE2
SE1
SE1
NREL | 15
PV system with worst-case voltage rise
• Microinverter system; higher ΔVbtm typical due to longer AC wire run
• Bi-modal: PV arrays on two different roof pitches
• One array peaks at average of 2 V rise (0.8%)
• Other array peaks at average of 5 V rise (2.1%)
• 2.1% is the highest array-level voltage rise seen in all 15 systems in the project
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Inverter Real Current (Amps)
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Del
ta V
olta
ge (V
)
Customer PN-15-02416
Total inverters : 34
EN2
Voltages on 240 V basis
NREL | 16
Daily maximum and minimum voltages – weak secondary location
• Cluster 1 – circuit M3 – long shared OH secondary (slide 10)
• Inverter voltage typically peaks around 1.04 pu, sometimes higher
• Volt-var active most days, volt-watt typically not
• Based on 15-minute average voltages. 1-minute and 1-second data shows greater variation
Higher voltages due to temporary primary configuration
Aug 2017 Sep 2017 Oct 2017 Nov 2017 Dec 2017 Jan 2018 Feb 2018 Mar 2018
time
0.94
0.96
0.98
1
1.02
1.04
1.06
1.08
V (p
u)
AMI 15min avg
AMI Daily Max
AMI Daily Min
Inv Daily Max
Inv Daily Min
Inv Avg Daily Max
Inv V avg = 1.026
Inv V avg daily max = 1.040
Inv V avg daily min = 0.992
AMI Vavg = 1.014
AMI V avg daily max = 1.039
AMI V avg daily min = 0.991
NREL | 17
Daily maximum and minimum voltage histogram – strong secondary location
• Cluster 2 – circuit A – newer UG secondary (slide 11)
• Impact of PV on voltage distribution is minimal
• Minimal behind-the-meter voltage rise
• Volt-var is rarely active and volt-watt is never active
• Estimated curtailment of PV production due to volt-var and volt-watt at this location is zero. Volt-var
threshold Volt-watt threshold
Mean daytime AMI voltage
Mean inverter voltage
ami night <06:00 >18:00
ami day 9:00-15:00
eni day 9:00-15:00
NREL | 18
Daily maximum and minimum voltage histogram – weak secondary location
• Cluster 1 – circuit M3 – long shared OH secondary
• 2nd-highest voltage location in pilot
• Impact of PV on voltage distribution is clear
• Minimal behind-the-meter voltage rise
• Estimated curtailment of PV production due to volt-var and volt-watt at this location is < 0.5% of monthly energy production.
Volt-var threshold
Volt-watt threshold
Mean AMI voltage Mean inverter voltage
ami night <06:00 >18:00
ami day 9:00-15:00
eni day 9:00-15:00
NREL | 19
0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08
Vpu
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
Pro
babi
lity
ami night <06:00 >18:00
ami day 9:00-15:00
eni day 9:00-15:00
ENIday Vavg = 1.040
AMI Vavg = 1.018
AMInight Vavg = 1.011 AMIday Vavg = 1.033
AMIday Vsd = 0.009
AMIday Vskew = -0.510
AMIday Vkurt = 3.84
AMI Total Sample Days = 111.6
AMI Total Samples = 2679
AMI Perc daytime >= 1.03Vpu = 64.2
AMI Perc daytime >= 1.06Vpu = 0.0
ENI Total Sample Days = 111.0
ENI Total Samples = 2664
ENI Perc daytime >= 1.03Vpu = 76.2
ENI Perc daytime >= 1.06Vpu = 6.2
Daily maximum and minimum voltage histogram – highest voltage location
• Significant voltage rise both on secondary and behind-the-meter
• Volt-var active about 76% of the time between hours of 9am-3pm
• Volt-watt active about 6% of the time between hours of 9am-3pm
• Expected curtailment is difficult to quantify exactly without irradiance data at this location o Based on available data,
estimated curtailment is < 5% of monthly energy production
o Re-examine in 2nd phase of pilot with irradiance sensor installed Volt-var threshold Volt-watt threshold
Mean AMI voltage Mean inverter voltage
NREL | 20
The table below was included in a letter sent to the customer. The table summarizes findings for that location for the first phase of the pilot.
Sample customer report
Customer name -Site -PV inverter -Application ID -
Typical daily maximum Typical daily minimum
Percentage of time above 103% of nomimal
Percentage of time above 106% of nomimal
Typical daily maximum
Typical daily minimum
125 volts 119 volts 38% 0.4% 124.5 volts 119 volts < 0.5% <0.5%
Note:Voltages are based on 15-minute average voltage measurements, and are shown on a nominal 120-volt basisThe typical daily maximum (15 minute average) is 124.5 volts as measured at the utility meter. The allowed voltage range is +/- 5% or 126-volts (maximum) to 114-volts (minimum).The volt-var curve is designed to provide reactive power above 123.6 volts to 127.2 volts (between 103% to 106% of nominal) for approximately 38% of the time in your location.The volt-watt curve curtails the PV output when voltages are above 127.2 volts (between 106% to 110% of nominal) for approximately less than <0.4% of the time in your location.
Recommendation:For safety reasons and to comply with interconnection standards, we will require the continued activation of the volt-watt Grid Support Function for your PV system to remain interconnected.With the additional panels added to your PV system, we are recommending continued monitoring to ensure the continued safe operation of your PV system.
Inverter voltage on a nominal 120-volt basis Meter voltage on a nominal 120-volt basis Estimated energy curtailment impact due to
volt-var:
Estimated energy curtailment impact due to
volt-watt:
Given the current voltage conditions observed are higher than the normal range of 114 volts to 126 volts, the PV output may be experiencing curtailment of less than < 1.0% of the total PV energy
NREL | 21
• In general, maximum field voltages measured do not appear to be as high as would be expected from interconnection reviews, likely for several reasons: o Without detailed load and secondary voltage information available during PV application review,
worst-case assumptions must be made o Limited sample size
• Communicating with inverters and sensors in the field is challenging o Cellular communications generally more reliable than customer internet
• Correlation between voltage and irradiance o In some locations, PV is very clearly driving secondary voltages - high correlation between voltage
at inverter and irradiance o In other locations, correlation between voltage and irradiance is moderate or low
• For voltage rise due to small secondary conductors, effectiveness of reactive power (volt-var or fixed PF 0.95) is limited
• Initial data confirms VROS finding that impact of volt-var and volt-watt on PV production is minimal o Measuring impact exactly is difficult without irradiance data – 2nd phase focuses on this (as well
as increasing pilot sample size, additional modeling/simulation/analysis)
Summary of findings so far
NREL | 22
• Additional recruitment of customers to avoid possible sample bias • Upfront effort to determine “customers of interest” for targeted sensor
deployment • What is the most critical data needed?
o Grid2020 valuable for analyzing problem cases, and for extrapolating to other scenarios via simulation
o Inverter manufacturer data is very valuable and available at relatively low effort compared to deploying dedicated communications and sensing
o AMI data very valuable for multiple purposes • Importance of AMI metering data
o Resolution of 1-minute vs. 15-minute – depends on use case o Availability of data for all customers tied to a node is useful for extrapolating
to other scenarios via simulation
Lessons Learned – Field Validation
www.nrel.gov
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.
Thank you
Publication Number
NREL | 24
Example of high correlation between irradiance and voltage
Cluster 1: One of two advanced inverters operating, in 0.95 PF mode This is the second-highest voltage location in the pilot Long shared overhead secondary
NREL | 25
Worst-case ΔVbtm for string inverter
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Inverter Real Current (Amps)
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Del
ta V
olta
ge (V
olts
)
Customer PN-15-03415
y = 0.083x1 + -0.796x 0
Est elec length 26/41/66 ft (AWG 12/10/8)
• 6 kW inverter • Note ~0.8 V
difference in inverter voltage and AMI voltage even at zero current
• Potentially due to voltage sensor mismatch and house wiring configuration
• Accounting for mismatch, max voltage rise would be ~2 volts (0.8%)
SE3