Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

79
Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience? Authors: Mengran Qu [email protected] Luqi Xu [email protected] Tutor: Michaela Sandell Examinator: Åsa Devine Subject: Relationship Marketing Group: A4 Course Code: 2FE21E 1

Transcript of Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Page 1: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Have you ever had a terrible online shopping

experience?

Authors:

Mengran Qu [email protected]

Luqi Xu [email protected]

Tutor: Michaela Sandell

Examinator: Åsa Devine

Subject: Relationship Marketing

Group: A4

Course Code: 2FE21E

1

Page 2: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Acknowledgement

In this study, the authors hold a great thanks to the people who helped and guided and took

part in the research. Without these people’s help, the study is unlikely to be done smoothly.

Firstly, we, as the authors in this research, would like to give great appreciation and respect to

our two excellent teachers. One is our tutor Michaela Sandell, and the other one is our thesis

examiner Åsa Devine. During the whole research period, both of them provided us with

countless help, helping us correct inappropriate phrases and solve various hard problems in

our daily study life. Michaela Sandell and Åsa Devine are not only the teachers of marketing

but more like life mentors, assisting to plan the study and life for us. Moreover, we would

like to thank Magnus Willesson who taught us carefully on how to operate the SPSS table, so

that we can finish the methodology part and relevant SPSS tables.

It is sure that the improvement of contents in this study is inseparable from our lovely

opposition group’s help. Without their help, lots of good suggestions will not pass to us. They

are the people who make us know how to exactly make progress after each time of

rephrasing.

Last but not least, we would like to sincerely say thanks to every person who participated in

our online questionnaires. Filling over seventy questionnaires needed much time to take, but

with their help, we quickly finished the collection.

Stockholm, 2020-10-05

_______________ _________________

Mengran Qu Luqi Xu

2

Page 3: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Abstract Background: Nowadays, the development of the internet makes online shopping more

popularized . The appearance of online shopping brings considerable benefits to customers,

however, there are still risks in the area. To maintain good relationship management between

customers and companies, it is necessary to understand the online customer experience and

its relevant important factors .

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explain the impact of three factors (low-quality

delivery, low-quality online customer service, and low-quality website design) on online

customer experience.

Methodology: The paper used a quantitative approach in cross-sectional design and collected

totally 78 responses. The related data collection is conducted through a self-completion

questionnaire in the online form.

Findings: The negative impacts of low-quality online customer service and low-quality

website design on online customer experience are confirmed. There is an effective and strong

connection between low-quality website design and low-quality online customer service.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, H2 and H3 cannot be rejected but H1 needs to be rejected.

One can therefore say that even in the context of rapid technological development, modern

online shoppers have not changed their aversion to low-quality elements, that the view that

low-quality online customer service and low-quality website design negatively affect OCE

has not changed.

Keywords: Online customer experience, low-quality delivery, low-quality online customer

service, low-quality website design, negative impact..

3

Page 4: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Table Of Contents

1. Introduction 6

1.1 Background 6

1.2 Problem Discussion 7

1.3 Purpose 9

2. Theoretical Framework 9

2.1 Online Customers Experience (OCE) 9

2.2 Low-Quality Delivery 10

2.3 Low-Quality Online Customer Service 12

2.4 Low-Quality Website Design 14

3. Conceptual Framework 16

3.1 Suggested Research Model 19

4. Method 24

4.1 Research Approach 24

4.1.2 Quantitative Research 22

4.2 Research Design 22

4.3 Data sources 24

4.4 Data Collection Method 25

4.5 Data Collection Instruments 25

4.5.1 Operationalization 29

4.5.2 Questionnaire Design 33

4.5.3 Pre-testing 35

4.6 Sampling 36

4.6.1 Sample Size 37

4.6.2 Sampling error 38

4.7 Data Analysis Method 38

4.7.1 Descriptive Analysis 39

4.7.2 Correlation Analysis 41

4

Page 5: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.7.3 Multiple Regression Analysis 42

4.8 Quality Criteria 43

4.8.1 Validity 43

4.8.2 Reliability 44

4.9 Ethical Issues 45

4.10 Societal issues 46

5. Results 47

5.1 Descriptive statistics 47

5.2 Correlation Statistics 49

5.2.1 Test of Validity 49

5.2.2 Test of Reliability 50

5.3 Multiple Regression Analysis (For The Hypothesis-Testing) 51

5.4 Hypothesis Results 54

6. Discussion 55

6.1 Delivery 55

6.2 Online Customer Service 57

6.3 Website design 58

7. Conclusion 59

7.1 Theoretical Implications 60

7.2 Managerial Implications 61

8. Limitations and Recommendation for the future research 62

8.1 Limitations 62

8.2 Recommendation For The Future Research 63

Reference List 63

Appendix 1 68

5

Page 6: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

Nowadays, the development of the internet makes online shopping more popularized. This

means more and more people join online shopping. As the statistics show, there are 1.8

billion people making online purchases in 2018 over the world (Statista, 2018) and which

create a total $2.8 trillion in sales (Mohsin, 2020). It also suggests that the world sale of

e-retail will increase to $4.8 trillion when it comes to 2021 (Mohsin, 2020). The appearance

of online shopping bring considerable benefits to customers, such as the advantage on

information acquisition and processing in interactive home shopping (Alba, Lynch, Weitz,

and Janiszewski, 1997), Another study states the positive effect through online shopping

when it cooperates with different goods types and in different situations, such as a good

intermediator to customers for communication and transaction when the product is

experienced and frequent, or a guide to customers for the product they want when product are

differentiated apparently ( Peterson, Balasubramanian, and Bronnenberg, 1997). However, it

does not mean online shopping is always good. For instance, there might be an uncertain

feeling for customers in the online context (Bhatnagar, Misra and Rao, 2000).

In this aspect, the relationship management between company and customers becomes

important, which is about value creations for both company and customers through acquiring,

maintaining and partnering with specific customers (Parvatiyar and Sheth, 2001). According

to Gartner (2011), the relationship between company and customers through the internet is

almost everywhere. Currently, it is declared that about 85% of relationships are managed

directly by customers and companies (Gartner, 2011). In order to maintain good relationship

management in e-commerce, online customer experience (OCE) is necessary. This is closely

related to what customers engage in the process of online shopping (Rose, Hair and Clark,

2011). The related studies state the relevant significance of delivery (Niu, Wang, Lee and

Chen, 2019), online customer service (Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016, Lim and Dubinsky,

2004) and website design (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009) to online customer experience, which

will be discussed in the following section.

6

Page 7: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

1.2 Problem Discussion

Nowadays, there are three elements that have been commonly and largely discussed by

marketing researchers in the context of e-commerce, they are delivery (Li, Lu and Talebian,

2014; Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017; Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017; Niu, Wang, Lee and

Chen, 2019), online customer service (Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016; Lim and Dubinsky,

2004), and website design (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016), respectively. In

general, they stand for different aspects of the phenomenon that online shoppers often touch

with. Delivery represents the transportation for shipping online purchased items (Li, Lu and

Talebian, 2014); Online customer service covers some main types of customer services which

would be involved and offered on websites (Lim and Dubinsky, 2004); As to website design,

as it name shows, which is what focuses on the design of shopping sites (Roghanizad and

Neufeld, 2015). All elements are closely related to the online shopping, however, when the

elements are in a low quality could result in a lot of negative impacts on customer minds

insofar they negatively affect online customer experiences (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017;

Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017; Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Küster, Vila

and Canales, 2016; Joines, Scherer and Scheufele, 2003; McLean and Wilson, 2016; Vos et

al., 2014; Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016). The first factor is low-quality delivery

which includes a lot of daily concerns. For example, when customers meet high shipping

costs, they are more likely to be impatient (Li, Lu and Talebian, 2014). Also, many tricky

incidents often occur in the shipping process, such as incomplete orders and product returns,

too long transportation time, ambiguous delivery time provided by poor systems, damaged

product packaging and so on (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017; Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017).

The second factor is low-quality online customer service which includes the issues such as

transactional privacy concerns (Joines, Scherer and Scheufele, 2003), the possibility of

service failure (McLean and Wilson, 2016). As to low-quality website design, the relevant

practical issues are such as bad layout, bad navigation design, and so on (Hasan, 2016;

Hausman and Siekpe, 2009).

Many researchers highlight the significance of learning customer’s online experiences as the

in-depth understanding of customers helps increase company competitiveness (Rose, Hair

and Clark, 2011; McLean and Wilson, 2016). This is due to the good e-commerce

7

Page 8: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

environment that can motivate shopper attitudes and positively influence their buying

intention (Martin, Mortimer and Andrews, 2015). Singh (2002) believed that a successful

company is inseparable from the interaction with customers. This idea is applicable for the

context of e-commerce as well. One can say that customers are the “heart” of e-business

(Singh, 2002). Hausman and Siekpe (2009) consistently considered customers and their

minds are the core value of being a successful company, meanwhile argued that if

e-commerce companies want shoppers to like them or even rely on them, they should first

understand and recognize their true favor (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009).

As research indicates, negative customer experiences have a greater impact on customer

buying decisions than pleasant experiences have, which pushes a research of understanding

customers through a “dark side” of e-commerce (Ou and Sia, 2010). Today, e-commerce has

become increasingly popular in the retail industry, facilitating numerous online stores

operating in many countries and regions (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017). The rapid

development of e-commerce makes customer expectations keep increasing (van Gils,

Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster, 2018). As such, researchers believe online customer

experience should be consistent with the development of technology (Rose, Hair and Clark,

2011). In other words, one is hard to confirm whether these significant elements in low

quality can still negatively affect online customer experiences or not (McLean and Wilson,

2016). It encourages to study the research with the subject of online consumer experience in a

new environment (Rose, Hair and Clark, 2011). Based on the significance of studying online

customer experience and its relevant three factors as mentioned above, the authors have an

interest in examining whether these factors still negatively affect online consumer experience

under the current context of rapid technological development. Therefore, this research is

designed as a quantitative study to test whether the factors (low-quality delivery, low-quality

online customer service, and low-quality website design) negatively affect online customer

experience.

8

Page 9: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

1.3 Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explain the impact of three factors (low-quality delivery,

low-quality online customer service, and low-quality website design) on online customer

experience.

2. Theoretical Framework

2.1 Online Customer Experience (OCE)

According to the literature, online customer experiences come from the things they have

touched during shopping (Rose, Hair and Clark, 2011). Online customer experience is

actually something that mimics the sensory experience in an offline environment (Bleier,

Harmeling and Palmatier, 2018). As findings showed, online customer experience is divided

in two branches, which are affective state and cognitive state (Rose, Clark, Samouel and Hair,

2012; Rose, Hair and Clark, 2011).

In regards to the affective side, it has a relation with people’s perceived control in online

shopping (Rose, Clark, Samouel and Hair, 2012). This type of control mainly comes from the

status of access and search as well as customer evaluation of the site using (Rose, Hair and

Clark, 2011). According to Rose, Clark, Samouel and Hair (2012), ease of use and

customization have impacts on affecting customer perceived control through empowerment.

Yet customization is less effective than ease of use since the idea of easy to use is the most

significant feature even if customization can empower customers by delivering advanced

technology (Rose, Clark, Samouel and Hair, 2012). Another study affirms the importance of

affective state and indicates that by gathering the effect of the ease of use and customization

customer sense of control to shopping sites can be strengthened (Martin, Mortimer and

Andrews, 2015). On the other hand, some studies mention telepresence and regard it as a

factor that strongly influences cognitive state (Martin, Mortimer and Andrews, 2015;

Bhattacharya, Srivastava and Verma, 2018). As researchers suggest, e-business should

particularly pay attention to telepresence as it is this factor that brings customers online

9

Page 10: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

experiences so that help them realize the goal of getting away from the real world. More

precisely, telepresence motivates a type of immersion called “cognitive immersion” for

customers that is similar to the pattern of offline shopping. In this context, the study indicates

a positive relationship between the length of time customers spend on shopping sites and

purchase decisions. In other words, it is important for e-commerce to focus on increasing

customer immersion time on the website. The proper way to facilitate customers to stay in

shopping sites is to make the shopping process more entertaining or engaging (Bhattacharya,

Srivastava and Verma, 2018). Also, telepresence can improve user engagement which insofar

increase customer interests to products or services. The visual element in regards to

telepresence including color vividness and graphic vividness can enhance user engagement

because the visual element is relatively more attractive to customers in an online environment

(Papagiannidis et al., 2017).

2.2 Low-Quality Delivery

Physical retailing satisfies needs that buyers take away their purchased products on the spot,

while the online stores are not the case with it. In e-commerce, goods need to be delivered

with some means of transportation within a period (Li, Lu and Talebian, 2014). Delivery

involves various transport options. Taking express delivery as an example, due to its fast

transportation speed, which is used as one of common approaches to deliver items. In

e-business, goods delivery is regarded as a critical problem. It is attributed that shoppers care

not only about the quality of products but that of delivery (Niu, Wang, Lee and Chen, 2019).

As research indicated, a mature international delivery can more effectively avoid issues in

terms of delivery, thereby saving time spent on the road (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017). On

the contrary, any problems related to the delivery work such as incomplete orders and

product returns, too long transportation time, the ambiguous delivery time provided by poor

systems. will cause relevant negative effects on online customers (Coşar, Panyi and Varga,

2017; Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017). The fact is even if the issues have been roughly solved

afterward, it is hard to fairly remove customers’ unpleasant memories or their initial terrible

impressions on the delivery work (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017).

10

Page 11: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

In ecommerce, there are two types of shipping fee strategies. One is the PS strategy means

the shipping fee is not included in the product price, in other words companies usually charge

for product prices and delivery costs separately. The other one is the ZS strategy, which

refers to exempt shipping fees. In other words, shipping fees are already considered in

product fees (Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013). According to research, online customers are

sensitive to shipping fees (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Lewis, Singh and

Fay, 2006). In other words, online customers have a strong awareness of delivery fees (Kim,

Dekker and Heij, 2017). With this consideration, some companies operate free shipping

strategies to retain online customers (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017; Lewis, Singh and Fay,

2006; Guo et al., 2020; Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013). Free shipping has the power to raise

the rate of online order incidence (online order occurrence) and suppress company revenues.

Nevertheless, although waiving shipping costs can please customers, it is not an option that

e-commerce companies only consider (Lewis, Singh and Fay, 2006). Unlike this, Gümüş, Li,

Oh and Ray (2013) stated that online customer attitudes towards the courier charge are

differently depending on company sizes. When shoppers choose to consume products from

large (i.e. popular) firms, they are willing to suffer the additional fee, i.e. the charge of

shipping fees. However, similar attitudes seldom exist when shoppers are facing small

enterprises (Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013). In addition, it is difficult for consumers to accept

high shipping fees. As a result, the low acceptance from customers suppresses enterprise

sales. The interests of both buyers and sellers are closely related to shipping fees (Guo et al.,

2020).

Due to the time from dispatch to pickup is normally scheduled tightly, it is hard to make sure

all the items are arranged properly (van Gils, Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster, 2018). Some

practical issues occur during this period, such as inaccuracy of traveling time, uncertain

pickup demand (Chen, 2013). In specific, e-commerce companies consider delivery time is of

importance in delivery works. The findings in many studies have taken the delivery time into

consideration and introduced a conventional way to cope with relevant challenges: set up

delivery time windows (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Moons, Ramaekers,

Caris and Arda, 2017; Chen, 2013). It is followed by a plentiful discussion about the problem

of vehicle routing and reaches the conclusion that offering rich delivery windows can provide

customers more options on delivery time. However, offering this service needs costs from

11

Page 12: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

companies. To make up for the loss, firms usually ask their customers to undertake this fee.

In other words, if consumers desire the delivery window service, they must pay for it

(Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Moons, Ramaekers, Caris and Arda, 2017).

Moreover, regarding the time issue, researchers indicated that when consumers preferred time

windows were not fulfilled, companies have the right to decide the time of delivering items

for the customers. As a result, home delivery failures often occur in daily shipping since it is

unrealistic for buyers to stay at home all day to wait for the goods (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons

and van Gils, 2018).

2.3 Low-Quality Online Customer Service

Online customer service is a big common concern for companies that are involved in the

domain of e-commerce (Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016). It is a bridge of communication

established between e-commerce companies and online customers, despite this type of

company-customer conversation normally conducted online. It differs from the traditional

way of face-to-face communication in the offline environment. Simply put, online customer

service is a certain system installed on shopping sites to provide customers with their needed

information during online shopping. At present, there are various forms of online customer

service presenting on online platforms, such as call centers, customer support, and choice

helpers (Lim and Dubinsky, 2004). Since the nature of online shopping is that the items are

listed on the websites and which are untouchable to shoppers (Lim and Dubinsky, 2004),

customers see the quality of e-service (electronic service) as an important element for

evaluating online shopping. Based on the study, the low-quality online customer service

reflects in some related practical issues, such as transaction privacy concerns, long searching

time on utilitarian product information, security/privacy concerns, and so on (Joines, Scherer

and Scheufele, 2003; McLean and Wilson, 2016; Rita, Oliveira and Farisa, 2019; Vos et al.,

2014; Pandey and Chawla, 2018; Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017). As stated by Küster, Vila

and Canales (2016), pre-purchase service and transaction related service are two different

service levels in the domain of e-commerce. The research highlights the significance of

12

Page 13: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

understanding customer thoughts with suitable service levels. This is due to all aspects of

e-service that can influence consumer experiences (Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016).

Pre-purchase service is one of service levels that involves product pricing, support of product

search and evaluation, and web appearance (Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016). E-search, as an

online search engine, which is used to encourage shoppers to search for product information,

payment information and customer opinions, allowing access to the information 24 hours

(Singh, 2002). One research mentioned two types of shopping sites that are based on

economic motivations and transactional privacy concerns respectively. When customers

search information for products or services, it shows a difference in time spendings of

customers between these two drivers. In specific, since the website based on economic

motivation aims to benefit people in price, people are more accepting of the passing of

surfing time. However, when the case comes to transactional privacy concerns, people hold

opposite attitudes. The main reason is that the website based on transactional privacy

concerns needs customers to provide the private information in order to get access to product

information databases, and this may result in a type of risk that disclosing customer privacy

(Joines, Scherer and Scheufele, 2003). In addition, the different search sources of information

that shoppers look for are depending on different product types. Firstly, utilitarian product

refers to a product that is goal orientated and more associated with functionality displayed.

There is literature discussing the time consciousness under utilitarian orientation. When the

time of searching is longer than what customers expected, a type of service failure related to

the searching will emerge and cause unpleasant customer experiences. In this context, an

online customer support which is run by a service representative becomes useful. According

to research, the quality of online customer support decides people’s final attitudes (McLean

and Wilson, 2016). In addition to utilitarian products, the hedonic product is another type of

product that focuses on how enjoyable customers are. Nevertheless, the abstract and blurred

features of hedonic products make it difficult for customers to accurately evaluate products in

the online searching process (Akalamkam and Mitra, 2017).

Another level of the service is transaction related service. As to this level of service, its scope

mainly involves security and privacy statements, and transaction mechanisms (Küster, Vila

and Canales, 2016). Based on the study, security/privacy is a dimension that triggers daily

13

Page 14: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

concerns of customers, meanwhile measures if online customer service is outstanding as well.

For example, customers worry about the security of the data in cards, which often occurs

when using the online service that offers credit card payment options (Rita, Oliveira and

Farisa, 2019). Security is also important when creating positive customer experience through

how it performed in the transaction process and product characteristics (Jaiswal and Singh,

2020). When customers emerge uncertain feelings towards products or services on shopping

sites, their evaluation of e-service quality will be correspondingly low (Vos et al., 2014). In

addition, security concerns would cause e-distrust (Pandey and Chawla, 2018; Coşar, Panyi

and Varga, 2017). According to a study, the existence of security vulnerabilities on websites

reveals a need to make up something in order to improve online consumer trust (Vos et al.,

2014).

2.4 Low-Quality Website Design

Website design is a vital task for companies operating e-commerce. By applying design

elements on shopping sites, e-commerce companies can effectively arouse customer’s online

experiences (Bleier, Harmeling and Palmatier, 2018; Bilgihan, Okumus, Nusair and Bujisic,

2013). It is perceived as a key factor to attract visitors to participate in online shopping

(Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Bleier, Harmeling and Palmatier, 2018). Design work plays an

important role in promoting customer relationships (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009). A website

with an intuitively appealing look and clear layout is conducive to forming a favorable web

context. Once the designer frames a fine web interface, the goal of constructing a natural and

intuitive website context is likely to be further fulfilled (Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015).

However, a large number of firms today have not yet reached this level of success since many

lack mature skills of designing web pages, meanwhile some improper ways of presenting

have aroused the dissatisfaction of some online customers. In fact, sometimes, just a tedious

interface design of a website is enough to enable customers to close it by clicking the mouse.

Some researchers revealed that such discomfort hides a series of intermediate negative

impacts, including the negative emotion and apathetic attitudes that emerged from the process

of shopping online (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016).

14

Page 15: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

The computer factor with utilitarian characteristics influences customer perception of

websites in regards to the feature of usefulness and informativeness on shopping sites.

Importantly, the computer factor has a link with customer relevant irritation. The factor is

considered as significant as it helps consumers understand the site layout and the navigation

for searching products or services (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009). Another study sheds light on

the negative relationship between all three characteristics of shopping sites in low quality

(visual, navigation, and information design) and customer relevant perceived irritation, and

subsequently draws a conclusion that all improper presenting for each characteristic can

cause corresponding side effects. For instance, when customers are feeling uncomfortable

and annoyed while surfing a shopping site, they may exit the website. In terms of visuals, the

cases involve many, such as bad layouts, uncomfortable font design, terrible colors, that all

have the potential to cause negative effects and terrible consequences. Pop-up news and

banners are no exception as well. In short, a terrible visual design in a website can make

visitors disappointed and catalyze a feeling of irritation (Hasan, 2016). Moreover, some

researchers found that online customers link both website efficiency and the quality of

website contents with visual effects closely (Bauer, Falk and Hammerschmidt, 2006). In

these three characteristics, navigation has the most significant impact on customer perceived

irritation. The navigation path for shoppers to visit websites is diverse, including the order of

browsing web pages, pictures they see on websites, and the time they take (Hasan, 2016).

Indeed, high quality of navigation settings can positively affect customer perceptions of

websites and their trustworthiness, however, if navigation with a sloppy design or a

complicated and vague look can easily anger customers (Hasan, 2016), so that triggers the

crisis of trust (Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015). Also, the findings provided support for the

argument that the factor of information design has a negative and significant impact on

irritation. One can say the factor is also a determinant of whether more customers will be

attracted to the website. In the counterexample, for instance, this characteristic presents in the

form of irrelevant information, incompatible information formats, or unwelcome information

transfer tools such as always running animation, that is likely to distract shoppers and

increase customer cognitive difficulty to online information, thereby offending and irritating

them (Hasan, 2016).

15

Page 16: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

3. Conceptual Framework

Delivery plays an increasingly important role in e-business as customers normally care about

the quality of goods delivery (Niu, Wang, Lee and Chen, 2019). A mature shipment is more

likely to help delivery work smoothly complete due to the high efficiency of transportation,

the competence of ingeniously avoiding relevant troubles, and so on (Kim, Dekker and Heij,

2017). Yet inferior delivery with even just a little problem can negatively affect customer’s

online shopping experiences (Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017; Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017).

Even if the issues have been roughly fixed, it is difficult to remove customer unpleasant

memories or their initial terrible impressions of delivery works (Kim, Dekker and Heij,

2017). One of the topics that was largely discussed by research is the shipping fee (Gümüş,

Li, Oh and Ray, 2013; Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Lewis, Singh and Fay,

2006; Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017; Guo et al., 2020). Based on studies, customers are

generally sensitive to it (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Lewis, Singh and Fay,

2006). For example, customers are less acceptable to high shipping fees (Guo et al., 2020),

which encourages many firms to adopt free shipping fees to attract online shoppers (Kim,

Dekker and Heij, 2017; Lewis, Singh and Fay, 2006; Guo et al., 2020; Gümüş, Li, Oh and

Ray, 2013). Yet another study supplements when customers facing products from different

sizes of companies, they hold opposite attitudes in paying courier fees (Gümüş, Li, Oh and

Ray, 2013). Also, delivery time is a big concern and includes a lot of practical issues in daily

shipment (van Gils, Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster, 2018; Chen, 2013; Ramaekers, Caris,

Moons and van Gils, 2018; Moons, Ramaekers, Caris and Arda, 2017). Despite the advanced

service namely delivery time window benefits customers by bringing them more choices on

delivery time, it is not free for customers (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018;

Moons, Ramaekers, Caris and Arda, 2017). Another serious issue related to delivery is home

delivery failure, meaning customer’s desired delivery time option has not been fulfilled by

companies, thus, bad experiences emerge (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018).

According to previous studies, any problems that appear in delivery work can contribute

negative customer experiences to customers because they care about the quality of delivery,

the price of shipping fee, and so on (Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017; Kim, Dekker and Heij,

16

Page 17: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

2017; Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013; Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Lewis,

Singh and Fay, 2006). However, since the development of technology is growing rapidly, the

volatile market environment has been difficult to ensure that consumer expectations remain

unchanged (Rose, Hair and Clark, 2011; van Gils, Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster, 2018).

Under this situation, it is hard to directly give a conclusion about if today’s low-quality

delivery work still negatively affects customers through these aspects and thereby bringing

them negative online experiences (McLean and Wilson, 2016). Based on the previous finding

in the mentioned studies and consumer’s psychological turbulence in this new context, a

hypothesis is proposed as:

H1: Low-quality delivery negatively affects online customer experiences.

Online customer service is a useful way for ecommerce companies to communicate with their

customers (Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016, Lim and Dubinsky, 2004), which also support the

online shopping process for customers (Lim and Dubinsky, 2004). According to the study, it

is important to understand what customers think through related service levels (Küster, Vila

and Canales, 2016). Based on the study, there are several practical issues regarding the

low-quality online customer service (Joines, Scherer and Scheufele, 2003; McLean and

Wilson, 2016; Rita, Oliveira and Farisa, 2019; Vos et al., 2014; Pandey and Chawla, 2018;

Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017) . In regards to pre-purchase service, customers have different

attitudes on product information searching in different situations (Joines, Scherer and

Scheufele, 2003; McLean and Wilson, 2016; Akalamkam and Mitra, 2017). The study shows

the website with transactional privacy concerns have higher negative impacts on customer

attitudes of searching time than websites with economic motivations (Joines, Scherer and

Scheufele, 2003). In terms of utilitarian products, if the time it takes to search for it exceeds

what customers expect to spend, it may cause service failure and customer’s negative

experiences, while online customer support is particularly important to what people think at

final (McLean and Wilson, 2016). Besides, the evaluation difficulty for hedonic products in

17

Page 18: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

online shopping is pointed out as well (Akalamkam and Mitra, 2017). On the other hand,

transactional-related service touches upon a practical issue: security/privacy concerns

(Küster, Vila and Canales, 2016; Rita, Oliveira and Farisa, 2019). In this regard, the uncertain

feelings of online shoppers makes a negative impact on e-service quality evaluation (Vos et

al., 2014). According to the research, there is a problem of e-distrust when people have low

security (Pandey and Chawla, 2018; Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017). Security is also a

determinant of customer perception of online experiences (Jaiswal and Singh, 2020). As

mentioned above, many previous studies more or less discussed the practical issues in

low-quality online customer services and consistently considered those issues can affect

online customer experiences negatively (Joines, Scherer and Scheufele, 2003; McLean and

Wilson, 2016; Rita, Oliveira and Farisa, 2019; Vos et al., 2014; Pandey and Chawla, 2018;

Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017). However, with the development of technology, it is hard to

conclude that today’s customer attitudes towards low-quality online service under this next

context have not changed at all (Rose, Hair and Clark, 2011; McLean and Wilson, 2016; van

Gils, Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster, 2018). Considering this, there is a need to test if

low-quality online customer service still has a negative impact on online customer

experiences. As such, the hypothesis is shown as:

H2: Low-quality online customer service negatively affects online customer experiences.

Website design, as an important part of the construction of shopping sites, also plays an

important role in building customer relationships (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009). Design

elements on shopping sites can make e-commerce companies effectively evoke customer’s

online experiences (Bleier, Harmeling and Palmatier, 2018; Bilgihan, Okumus, Nusair and

Bujisic, 2013). The attractive look and clear layout can construct a friendly web context,

thereby bringing customers good and comfortable feelings (Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015).

However, improper ways of presenting websites will lead to a series of side effects, including

customer dissatisfaction (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016), crisis of trust

(Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015), and customer irritation (Hasan, 2016). As the study shows,

sometimes even only one place in the web design disgusts consumers can force them to leave

18

Page 19: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

the website (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016). In specific, Hasan (2016) divided the

website features into three categories and deeply discussed the relationship between each of

the characteristics and customer perceived irritation. As previous findings show, all

characteristics with an inferior design can lead to negative customer experience. Among

them, navigation as one of the characteristics has the most significant impact on customer

irritation (Hasan, 2016), which can cause a crisis of trust as well (Roghanizad and Neufeld,

2015). While many previous studies believed improper ways of designing shopping sites can

lead to negative online customer experiences (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016;

Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015), customer perception towards websites would become

uncertain under the new context. That is due to the shopping sites customers have touched are

changed, customers today’s relevant perception of shopping sites becomes unknown (Rose,

Hair and Clark, 2011; McLean and Wilson, 2016; van Gils, Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster,

2018). Thus, it is unsure whether the statement that the low quality of website design

negatively affects online customer experiences in the previous research is consistent with

today’s situation or not. In this context, a hypothesis based on this conjecture is formulated as

below:

H3: Low-quality website design negatively affects online customer experiences.

3.1 Suggested Research Model

According to the section above, a new research model that considers all the hypotheses can

be built. It is visualized and showed as below:

19

Page 20: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Figure 1: Conceptual Model

4. Method

4.1 Research Approach

4.1.1 Deductive Research

20

Page 21: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

According to the research, a deductive approach is the testing of theories that shows and

reflects the nature of the relationship between theory and the related study. When a deductive

approach is taken, the theoretical content in a specific area will be presented as the base of the

study and push the related hypothesis making, which means the hypothesis is what is deduced

from the theoretical base. The hypothesis then will be examined through the empirical study.

In detail, the hypothesis is constituted by the related concept which can be studied as the

researchable entities or the operational terms. In this respect, it guides a direction for

researchers on how to collect the data. Moreover, as the study showed, the usage of theory in

the deductive approach is explained as mainly for empirical study in sociology (Bryman &

Bell, 2015).

Compared to the induction approach, the deduction approach shows a study process from the

start of the theory content to a final observation or findings. When the study comes to the

final stage, there is one thing to note is that the approach here becomes the opposite, which

means an inductive process that researchers take out the implication from the related findings

that promote the study and moreover, the findings created by researchers includes the theory

revision and the knowledge contribution in the certain specific field. In other words, in the

world of deductive reasoning, it pursues to use universally acknowledged theories to

understand how things work and to prove them through the identified problem (Bryman &

Bell, 2015). Sierotowicz and Sierotowicz (2017) simply distinguish induction and deduction

with an example regarding white beans and a bag. That is, when facing the inductive basis of

“These beans are from this bag”, inductive reasoning can generate the statements that “These

beans are white” and then followed by a statement that “All the beans from this bag are

white”. Yet in a deductive world, when the basis is “All the beans from this bag are white”,

the following statement would be “These beans are from the bag; These beans are white”

(Sierotowicz and Sierotowicz, 2017).

The conduction of the deductive approach is considered as a step by step and linear process

which is clear and logical. However, the understanding of the theory or concept at the end

might be different compared to what the researchers present before. This is because of the

data collection process and its subsequent analysis. For example, the relevance between the

theory and the data collected is only shown after the data collection. There is also a situation

21

Page 22: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

that the data collected contradicts the hypothesis. This means the hypothesis might be

rejected due to the contradicted fact (Bryman & Bell, 2015). Therefore, with the aim of

testing the proposed hypothesis considering the three independent variables (low-quality

delivery, low-quality online customer service, and low-quality website design), deductive

reasoning will be adopted by authors in the research. As such, the hypothesis deduced from

the relevant theoretical base will be rejected or accepted in the study by testing the theory,

and the concept of theories will be proved or not be proved with the deductive approach.

4.1.2 Quantitative Research

There are two research strategies which are named quantitative research and qualitative

research, while quantitative research is what is associated with the deductive approach. One

difference between quantitative research and qualitative research is that quantitative research

adopts measurement in the study while the qualitative one does not. With regard to

measurement, concept is necessary and which can split into dependent and independent

variables. In quantitative research, the quantification of related information is shown through

the process of data collection which is numerical and its following analysis. Through the

process, the study result can be more precise. Moreover, the strategy is conducted in a

deductive approach and reflects positivism with the natural science norms and the objectivity

of the social reality. The latter two are related to the thinking of epistemology and ontology

(Bryman & Bell, 2015). In this study, the authors are going to figure out the impact of

low-quality delivery, low-quality online customer service and low-quality website design on

online customer experience. As the theoretical base already exists and which creates the

hypothesis, it is accessible to do the quantitative study to improve the understanding of the

study through quantified information.

4.2 Research Design

One of the critical parts when researchers conducting quantitative research is the research

design. Generally, a good selection of research design connotes the final collected data is

22

Page 23: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

effective as if it is tailored to the study. Bryman and Bell (2015) defined research design as a

significant tool that helps offer a framework for both data collection and data analysis. The

reasons why research design is considered significant are many, such as its role of explaining

causal relationships between variables, learning behaviors and finding out the meanings of

the behaviors under a particular social background, enhancing the breadth of the study that

more people related to the former individuals who participated in the investigation will be

generalized through the research. Importantly, it escaped the shackles of outdated knowledge,

pursued the current learning of social phenomena and their interrelationships and admitted

the temporary effects of such operations (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

In the book by Bryman and Bell (2015), five common research designs are mentioned in

total. They are experimental designs; cross-sectional design; longitudinal design; case study

design; comparative design. Different categories of research designs decide different

constructions of the framework. Among them, the cross-sectional design is the most

commonly used design in social survey research, which explains why it has another name

called “social survey design”. It is normally applicable for testing multiple cases and for

many data on variables of interest that are collected at the same time. In this regard,

cross-sectional design and experimental design are distinguished accordingly. In other words,

in conducting the work of data collection, individuals can use questionnaires to help

researchers collect and analyze variables under the cross-sectional design simultaneously,

while the collection of data needs to be fulfilled through some time phases under the

experimental design, and which needs researchers to divide individuals into several groups to

conduct the collection work. Importantly, cross-sectional design can effectively test the

relationships between variables. Also, the design is suitable for both quantitative and

qualitative study (Bryman and Bell, 2015). Since this study is intended to be conducted

quantitatively with the task of testing three relationships between independent variables and

dependent variables respectively, the authors decide to choose cross-sectional design as the

research design in order to effectively complete the data collection.

23

Page 24: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.3 Data Sources

What exactly is data? It is a hard question to answer. Because there are tremendous types of

data existing in today’s world. Yet it is also an easy question to answer since regardless of

what types of data all express one meaning: facts. More precisely, data can be categorized

with two basic dimensions: quantitative or qualitative, root or derived. The former dimension

is the main focus in this study. Quantitative data records facts in numerical form while

qualitative data records facts in non-numeric form. In the domain of business, quantitative

data and qualitative data have essentially the differences in collecting facts. For quantitative

data types, which usually highlights the role of respondents in the process of data collection,

and the numeric, objectively format for analysis is followed to adopt. In contrast, qualitative

data types pursue producing facts in a non-numerical way of going deep into the individual

insights (Banasiewicz, 2013).

With regard to quantitative data types, primary data and secondary data are considered as two

common types of data sources in marketing research. Literally, primary data refers to

collecting primary data whereas secondary data works for secondary captures. One of the

most obvious distinctions between two data types is the perception of the outcomes and

sources. That is, primary data believes that the outcomes of the study are property of sources,

while secondary data hold totally opposite ideas. In general, primary data is a type of

collecting quantitative industry data that mainly involves surveys and is conducted for a

specific purpose based on different studies. Also, the spotlight put on respondent

representativeness in primary data reflects individual discrepancy including demographics,

specific behavior, lifestyles. As a result, the nature of quantitative data in the statistic is

normally forecastable and analyzable insofar as it holds out the wider generalizations

(Banasiewicz, 2013). Due to the research having a specific focus on testing three

relationships between variables, one intends to adopt the primary data to access and collect

data sources to fulfill the particular purpose in this study.

24

Page 25: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.4 Data Collection Method

In a deductive approach, data collection is the third step after presenting theory and

hypothesis. At this stage, a researcher needs to consider a technique to collect data, which

refers to the research method. The research method can be a self-completion questionnaire,

structured interview or participant observation. Among them, the self-completion

questionnaire is one of the common tools for data collection with a social survey design. As

the name shows, a self-completed questionnaire is what is completed by respondents

themselves. For example, postal-questionnaire is one of the forms of self-completion

questionnaires. In this form, the questionnaire will be posted to the respondent for answering

and then returned back to the sender when the questionnaire is completed. The research

mentioned that the self-completion questionnaire is almost the same type of structural

interview. One significant difference here is that the self-completion questionnaire does not

need a host to participate in the process. In this context, the respondent is who takes part in

the whole process. Therefore, it is important to have an instrument which easily guides the

respondent. A question that is hard to answer is inappropriate here. Compared to structural

interviews, the self-completion questionnaire is mostly with closed questions and with the

shorter length. These characteristics make it easy to operate and prevent the possibility of

being tired in answering questions and give up on it by respondents. A well-prepared

self-completion questionnaire is useful to collect massive data without high time-consuming.

It also reduces the cost of the researcher in data collection, especially when the sample for the

study has a wide geographical distribution (Bryman and Bell, 2015). As mentioned above, the

nature of self-completion questionnaires match the area of this study and meanwhile this

research method benefits both authors and respondents. Therefore, the authors decide to use

the self-completion questionnaire to collect relevant data for the study.

4.5 Data Collection Instruments

Compared to doing interviews, the questionnaire has a limitation that it might have a lower

response rate. This especially happens in postal-questionnaire. As it stated, a lower response

25

Page 26: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

rate will cause bias in the study since the difference between respondents and people who are

no-answering is considered. Accordingly, there is an alternative which is named online

questionnaire. In this method, the data will be collected through the web. The research shows

that there is a higher degree of completion of questions in an online form compared to a

postal form. The advantages of conducting online questionnaires are many, such as lower

cost, faster response, unrestricted compass, etc (Bryman and Bell, 2015). As Gallhofer and

Saris (2014) states, the advanced web technology makes it possible to get access to a huge

amount of data with cost advantage. Therefore, the study is going to conduct the

self-completion questionnaire online. Even though there are still some limitations the method

has, such as the difficulty to get a representative sample out (Bryman and Bell, 2015;

Gallhofer and Saris, 2014), since the topic of the study is about online customer experience,

this can be ignored to some extent.

4.5.1 Operationalization

The process for the authors to create measures on related concepts that are going to study is

named as operationalization (Bryman and Bell, 2015). According to Gallhofer and Saris

(2014), the term operationalization is also considered as a process to convert the concept into

questions (Gallhofer and Saris, 2014). To make up measures on concepts, the authors need to

develop indicators to represent the concept. It can be associated with questions that are going

to be asked through a questionnaire, the relevant structural observation schedule and so forth

(Bryman and Bell, 2015). The operationalization below is divided into six parts, which are

concept, concept definition, sub concepts, items, questions and reference. The related

concepts formed 21 questions in total for the following measurement.

26

Page 27: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.5.1.1 Operationalization Table

Table 1: Operationalization Table

Concept Concept Definition Sub concepts

Items Questions Reference

Online

Customer

Experience

(OCE)

Online customer

experiences come from the

things they have touched

during shopping (Rose,

Hair and Clark, 2011). It is

actually something that

mimics the sensory

experience in an offline

environment (Bleier,

Harmeling and Palmatier,

2018). Online customer

experience is divided in

two branches, which are

affective state and

cognitive state (Rose,

Clark, Samouel and Hair,

2012; Rose, Hair and

Clark, 2011)

Affective

State

Ease of use OCE1: The function of easy to use on shopping sites empowers me with the feeling of control.

Rose, Clark,

Samouel and Hair

(2012)

Martin, Mortimer

and Andrews

(2015)

Customization OCE2: The function of customization (the functions with advanced technology) on shopping sites empowers me

Rose, Clark,

Samouel and Hair

(2012)

Martin, Mortimer

and Andrews

(2015)

27

Page 28: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

with the feeling of control.

Cognitive

State

Entertaining

shopping

process

OCE3: An entertaining shopping process makes me want to stay in the shopping site longer.

Bhattacharya,

Srivastava and

Verma (2018)

Engaging

shopping

process

OCE4: An engaging shopping process makes me want to stay in the shopping site longer.

Bhattacharya,

Srivastava and

Verma (2018)

Color vividness

OCE5: The color vividness of a shopping site is something that improves my online engagement.

Papagiannidis et

al. (2017)

Graphic

vividness

OCE6: The graphic vividness of a shopping site is something that improves my online engagement.

Papagiannidis et

al. (2017)

Low-Quality Delivery

In e-commerce, goods need

to be delivered with some

means of transportation

within a period (Li, Lu and

Talebian, 2014). The

low-quality delivery

Shipping

Fees

High shipping fees

LQD1: I am not willing to accept high shipping fees.

Guo et al. (2020)

28

Page 29: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

includes issues such as

incomplete orders and

product returns, too long

transportation time, the

ambiguous delivery time

provided by poor systems,

and so on (Coşar, Panyi

and Varga, 2017; Kim,

Dekker and Heij, 2017).

Customer attitudes towards shipping fee in small companies

LQD2: I am not willing to accept shipping charges when shopping for products from small companies.

Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray (2013)

Delivery

Time

Charges for multiple delivery time windows

LQD3: I am not willing to pay for delivery time windows (A service that provides multiple shipping time options).

Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils (2018)

Moons, Ramaekers, Caris and Arda (2017)

Home delivery failure

LQD4: I am not willing to accept home delivery failures.

Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils (2018)

29

Page 30: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Low-Quality

Online

Customer

Service

Online customer service is

a certain system installed

on shopping sites to

provide customers with

their needed information

during online shopping. At

present, there are various

forms of online customer

service presenting on

online platforms, such as

call centers, customer

support, and choice helpers

(Lim and Dubinsky, 2004).

The low-quality online

customer service reflects in

some related practical

issues, such as transaction

privacy concerns, long

searching time on

utilitarian product

information,

security/privacy concerns,

and so on (Joines, Scherer

and Scheufele, 2003;

McLean and Wilson, 2016;

Rita, Oliveira and Farisa,

2019; Vos et al., 2014;

Pandey and Chawla, 2018;

Coşar, Panyi and Varga,

2017).

Pre-Purchase

Service

Transactional privacy concerns

LQOCS1: When a shopping site asks me to provide private information to get product information, my privacy is at risk of being disclosed.

Joines, Scherer and Scheufele (2003)

30

Page 31: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Time attitudes under transactional privacy concerns

LQOCS2: I am not willing to stay in the shopping site when it asks me to provide private information to get product information.

Joines, Scherer and

Scheufele (2003)

Time consciousness under utilitarian orientation

LQOCS3: I am not willing to spend more time searching for utilitarian products (a goal-oriented product with functionality) when the time exceeds what I expected.

McLean and Wilson (2016)

Weak online customer support

LQOCS4: I am not willing to stay in the shopping site if its online customer support is weak.

McLean and Wilson (2016)

Attribute defects of hedonic products

LQOCS5: The abstract and blurred features of hedonic (enjoyable) products make it difficult for me to evaluate the product.

Akalamkam and

Mitra (2017)

Transaction related service

E-distrust based on security/privacy concerns

LQOCS6: I am not willing to trust the shopping site when it arouses me security/privacy concerns.

Pandey and Chawla (2018) Coşar, Panyi and Varga (2017).

31

Page 32: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Low-QualityWebsite Design

Website design refers to

the design of the web

interface. A website with

an intuitively appealing

look and clear layout can

form a favorable web

context (Roghanizad and

Neufeld, 2015). The

counterexample (improper

ways) of the website

design includes many, such

as bad layouts,

uncomfortable font design,

terrible colors, pop-up

news, banners, irrelevant

information, incompatible

information formats, and

so on (Hasan, 2016).

Dissatisfaction with website design

Improper ways of presenting

LQWD1: The improper presenting of the website design makes it difficult for me to feel satisfied.

Hausman and Siekpe (2009)

Hasan (2016)

Customer Perceived Irritation

Inferior visual design

LQWD2: I am not willing to accept low-quality visual design (e.g. bad layouts, uncomfortable font design, terrible colors, pop-up news, banners, etc.) of a shopping site.

Hasan (2016)

Inferior navigation

LQWD3: I am not willing to accept low-quality navigation settings (e.g. sloppy design, a complicated look, vague look, etc.)

Hasan (2016)

32

Page 33: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

of a shopping site.

Inferior information design

LQWD4: I am not willing to accept low-quality information design (e.g. irrelevant information, incompatible information formats, etc.) of a shopping site.

Hasan (2016)

Trustworthiness

Crisis of trust to inferior navigation

LQWD5: I am not willing to trust a shopping site with low-quality navigation settings (e.g. sloppy design or a complicated or vague look, etc.).

Roghanizad and

Neufeld (2015)

4.5.2 Questionnaire Design

Respondents can effectively respond to the questionnaire when it is easy and suitable for

them (Gillham, 2015). Many authors mentioned a lot of pros and cons of questionnaires in

books despite they also acknowledge that designing a good questionnaire is a complicated

task and requires enterprises to make efforts for it (Gillham, 2015; Gallhofer and Saris, 2014;

Bryman and Bell, 2015). This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the untouched nature of

questionnaires, which may cause some misunderstandings uncontrollably between

questionnaire designers and respondents (Gillham, 2015). Gallhofer and Saris (2014)

believed that “In designing a question, many decisions are made”. In other words, if people

who design the questionnaire can foresee the influence of the designed questionnaire in the

following responses would be good (Gallhofer and Saris, 2014). Gillham (2015) consistently

33

Page 34: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

expressed that the wording of questions have a great effect on the answers. As such, one

suggests conducting careful consideration and asking researchers themselves if respondents

can effectively understand the designed questions before attempting to design optimal

questions (Gillham, 2015).

Knowing how to design a superior questionnaire is an important part of research methods for

researchers to consider. In this study, the authors pay attention to not only keeping the entire

layout of the self-completion questionnaire as concise as possible but also following the

designing guidelines suggested by Gillham (2015) that simplify the survey questions and

make sure the information regarding all respondents are anonymous (Gillham, 2015). The

entire questionnaire is conceived and designed around the subject of online customer

experience in the online environment and is presented to respondents via an online channel

namely Google Form. It is noted that the authors consciously divided all questions into three

zones in order to guide respondents to gradually adapt the answering environment. The zones

are general questions, general information, questions regarding the subject area, respectively.

By adding the statements under the second and third title of three main sections may help

respondents easily understand the entire design of the questionnaire. Moreover, the sentences

that tell respondents they will enter the subject area when they arrived in the third question

zone can to some extent remind them to fill out the survey carefully.

One should note here is the authors designed each survey question regarding independent

variables into the “double negative” style. Take LQOCS4 as an example, this survey question

“I am not willing to stay in the shopping site if its online customer support is weak.” includes

two pieces of information, one is “I am not willing to”, the other one is “ the weak online

customer support”. The first piece means the customer expresses negative emotion, the

second piece means an online customer support with a negative status. Combining these two

pieces of information presents a negative attitude towards negative items. Therefore, if

participants see the question and hold the same attitudes they can choose “agree”, otherwise

they should choose “disagree” to express they will not hold negative attitudes towards

negative items.

34

Page 35: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.5.3 Pre-testing

Regardless of a structural interview or a self-completion questionnaire, pre-testing is a

necessary step for a preparatory work of the study. The term pre-testing is also named as pilot

study. For self-completion questionnaires, considering the setting which does not include an

interviewer to participate, the status of pre-testing is especially important. Specifically

speaking, pre-testing moderates the situation of no interviewer which makes it unable to

make an explanation to respondents about the questions. Moreover, pre-testing is useful to

reduce the possible large amount of wastage assuming that there are still problems in the

questionnaire when it is sent out (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

Generally, pre-testing is mainly functioned on questions control. For instance, if there is any

question that is difficult for the respondent to understand or the question makes the

respondent unwilling to answer, a pre-testing can help the researcher to find it out in advance.

For the latter problem, the research stated several possible reasons, such as confusing or

threatening paraphrasing, poor worded instructions or confusing positioning of the questions.

Pre-testing can also detect the situation for questions that get almost the same answer and

therefore researchers can remove or adjust the questions afterwards. Through the process, the

flow for whole questions and the quality of the instruction in the questionnaire can be

examined (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

In this study, the authors considered 10 respondents in the pre-testing. These respondents are

ensured not included in the formal study by authors since it might influence the result of the

study due to the problem of sample representativeness can be arised (Bryman and Bell,

2015). Through the pre-testing, the unclear described place in a question that is considered

with a tendency to confuse respondents are found and then adjusted by authors. Besides, the

most important problem the authors found after the pre-test is that the answers of the survey

questions related to the independent variables look a little bit scattered. After carefully

thinking, the authors finally find the reason behind this phenomenon, which is that the likert

order listed under the questions of independent variables is wrong. Since the paper is to test

35

Page 36: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

the relationship between three elements in low quality and online customer experience, to

keep the correct measures and the related relationship between that is going to test, it is

necessary to keep consistent in the measurement of the dependent variable and independent

variables. This means the same order of likert scale under each of the statements. More

precisely, the order related to independent variables needs to be corrected into the same order

as dependent variables’, that is the order from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” (the

previous order under independent questions is incorrectly from “strongly agree” to “strongly

disagree”). The details about likert scale setting for the questions will be discussed in the data

analysis method.

4.6 Sampling

Sampling is defined as what links with the selection of individuals for interviews or

questionnaires. One can say that in quantitative research, the sample is always an essential

need. It is a subset of the population because the sample is segmented by the population for

investigations. More precisely, the sample is selected from the rich and universal units in the

entire broader scales (population) through the sample frame. The way of selecting the sample

often includes two sampling approaches, one is probability sampling and the other is

non-probability sampling. The biggest distinction between these two approaches is whether

or not to adopt a random way to select samples. As their name shows, the former approach

focuses on randomly selecting samples while the latter focuses on the opposite way. In other

words, non-probability sampling is more likely to choose some units as samples than others

(Bryman and Bell, 2015). Come back to the actual sampling work in this study, since the time

and efforts for choosing samples to collect data are limited, one intends to use the social

platform namely Facebook to conduct the relevant surveys. As such, probability sampling is

not applicable in this case. Following the meanings of Bryman and Bell (2015), convenience

sampling is the most appropriate non-probability sampling method in this study because it

guides managers easily to find a group of people that is available to them. However, this kind

36

Page 37: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

of sampling approach has a defect that it may fail to achieve the effect of generalizing the

findings in the end as managers have no idea what the population the samples exactly stand

for. Despite this, the approach can deliver a springboard to the research and help establish

some links with existing findings in the specific area. Therefore, convenience sampling is still

a very common and useful sampling approach in the field of business and management

(Bryman and Bell, 2015).

4.6.1 Sample Size

Before collecting data, researchers usually consider the question about how many n needs to

be collected to achieve excellent detection of N. However, this is a challenge for most

managers. Indeed, the determination of the sample size in the quantitative method connotes

multiple aspects of consideration, such as data accuracy requirements, time and cost

considerations. In addition, adopting a good sample size is not saying a larger or smaller

sample size means the best but is more depending on the population. When collecting a

sample of a country or a city, it means that the sample is very heterogeneous and diverse, so

the large-scale sample collection is required. In specific, when the sample size increases, the

sampling error is followed to decrease insofar the accuracy of the sample will increase.

That’s also why it is stated that the small sample size may produce many uncertain results.

Nevertheless, one is noted that if the accuracy of the sample is too pursued, it may take more

time and cost for it, thereby causing a likely high degree of uneconomical collecting

processes. Also, conducting a too large sample size has the potential to waste scarce

resources (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

Green (1991) cited in VanVoorhis and Morgan (2007) believed that when measuring the

number of individuals being sampled in a study, there is a need to calculate the sample size

with a formula, which is: N > 50 + 8m, where the N represents the minimum number of the

participants that a study should have and m refers to the number of independent variables

37

Page 38: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

(Green, 1991 cited in VanVoorhis and Morgan, 2007). Since this study includes three

independent variables in total, thus, the sample size could be formulated into 74 respondents

(N > 50 + 8 x 3 = 74) based on the suggested formula (Green, 1991 cited in VanVoorhis and

Morgan, 2007).

4.6.2 Sampling Error

It is impossible to ensure that no sampling errors appear in a study. The sampling deficiency

such as bad sampling frame or non-response or poorly designed survey questions makes

samples have discrepancy with the population more or less. As mentioned above, the times of

the frequency of errors will decrease as the sample size increases insofar the relevant

precision gets high. Since convenience sampling is not likely to realize generalizability and

support the existing research in specific subject areas, the phenomenon of “non-response”

may occur. That is, if some individuals of the sample do not truly appear to answer the survey

or lose contacts, the so-called “non-response” will thus appear in this way. It certainly exists

some people who are selected in the sample fail to effectively participate in the survey due to

some personal reasons such as some psychological or physical barriers (Bryman and Bell,

2015; Gallhofer and Saris, 2014).

4.7 Data Analysis Method

How to make data analysis is an important thing to consider and keep in mind for researchers

even in very early stages of the study. The choice of which technique to use will be related to

questionnaire design, observation schedule, coding frame, etc. As the research shows, the

decision on technique is mainly affected by the type of variables and the nature and the

sample size (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

A tool that is most widely used for quantitative data analysis is SPSS (Bryman and Bell,

2015). According to Bryman and Cramer (2012), SPSS is effective for researchers to analyze

the data with the benefit of time saving, calculation support and inevitable mistakes avoided

38

Page 39: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

(Bryman and Cramer, 2012). Through SPSS, the study is supported with the result through

data analysis. As the research shows, it is necessary to do coding of the data before the data

collection is finished (Bryman and Bell, 2015). In this study, the five-point likert scale is used

for the questions (exclude the control questions), which indicates the attitude of people to an

object, which usually represents the degree from agreement to disagreement (Bryman and

Bell, 2015). In the questionnaire, 1 stands for “strongly disagree” and 5 stands for “ strongly

agree”. The closed questions makes the data pre-coded, which assists the computer conduct

the data analysis in an easier way (Bryman and Bell, 2015; Gillham, 2015). In this study, all

the survey questions related to the dependent and independent variables are followed with a

likert order from strongly disagree to strongly agree, which matches the code 1 “strongly

disagree” and 5 is “ strongly agree”. Besides, there is a situation where missing data occurs

after data is collected. The reason for this might be unwilling to answer or a wrong operation

by respondents. One way to deal with this is to code the answer with a number that can be

identified for computer analysis (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

4.7.1 Descriptive Analysis

According to Bryman and Cramer (2012), descriptive analysis is considered as the first stage

of the analysis which provides a general understanding about respondents through their

answers. The use of it is wide and makes impact to further analysis. It also emphasizes the

fitness between closed questions and the method (Bryman and Cramer, 2012). Around

descriptive analysis, there are several important figures that need to be noticed. As the

research shows, central tendency is what can be seen through distribution of values. In this

area, there are three averages for researchers to access. The first one is Arithmetic mean,

which is known as the average by people in a general view. It is calculated by dividing the

sum of values to the numbers of values in the distribution. The number is easier to be

influenced by extreme values or outliers in other words. The second one is median, which is

positioned in the middle of the distribution that obtains the lists of all of the values from the

small to large order. If the total number of the values is even then the researcher needs to find

the two middle numbers and calculate the mean of them. Compared to arithmetic mean, this

number is more stable. The third one is mode, which refers to the number with highest

39

Page 40: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

occurrences in the distribution. Besides, the variation of the sample can be seen through

dispersion. The value of dispersion is affected by outliers and which can be measured by the

range that is calculated by the maximum value minus the minimum value from the

distribution of values. There is also another way of measurement of dispersion which is by

standard deviation. This term is defined as the average amount of variation of the mean and

which is calculated by the sum of the difference between each value and mean, and then use

this number to divide the number of the values. It argued that standard deviation is also

affected by outliers, however, the calculation step which divides the number of the values

makes the effect eliminated (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

Moreover, the measurement of skewness is what needs to be considered in descriptive

analysis as well. The research states that when a histogram is not symmetric, it can be said

that the histogram is skewed. There are two possible results as left-skewed (negatively

skewed) and right-skewed (positively skewed). Left-skewed means the left-hand tail is over

the right-hand tail and the right-skewed is the opposite meaning. The measurement of

skewness can be done through where arithmetic mean, median and mode are located in the

distribution. There are totally three situations in the measurement. The first situation is that

there are no differences among three values since the histogram is perfectly symmetric. In

this situation, the level of skewness is 0. The second situation is that the mean is smaller than

the median and then smaller than the mode as the histogram is left-skewed. The last situation

is the reverse of the second one as the histogram is right-skewed. Such result is closely

related to the sensitive impact of arithmetic mean to the extreme values. The skewness

coefficient can be calculated by a specific skewness value over the sample standard deviation.

As there is a factor 3 in the formula, which delimit an interval between -3 to 3 for skewness

values lies (Goos and Maintrup, 2015) . As stated by Martin and Bridgmon (2012) , skewness

is a measurement on normality of the data, which means it aims to present the information

from the normal population. Therefore, if the result is left-skewed or right-skewed, it means

there are extreme scores or outliers on the left (with negative skewness value) or right side

(with positive skewness value) while the others on the opposite site on the curve. In other

words, if the result is more close to 0, then it means there is more normality on the data

40

Page 41: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

(Martin and Bridgmon, 2012). As mentioned above, the measurement of skewness shows the

distribution of the data and elaborate the thinkings of the samples in the study.

Lastly, kurtosis is the value that appears when a histogram with a sharp peak. It measures the

steepness of the data. In a normal distribution, the value of kurtosis should be 0. When the

peak of the histogram is sharper, the value is larger than 0, otherwise the situation is the

opposite (Goos and Maintrup, 2015). According to Martin and Bridgmon (2012), kurtosis is

also a measurement which aims at the normality of the data. When there is a sharper peak

(leptokurtic), it means the data are more concentrated in the middle of the curve. Relatively,

if there is a flatter peak (platykurtic), it means the data are more dispersed. The range of the

kurtosis value can not exceed positive 3.29 or negative 3.29, or it will cause problems on the

data since there is a significant difference from the data to normality (Martin and Bridgmon,

2012).

4.7.2 Correlation Analysis

Correlation analysis is what can measure the degree of the relationship between variables

more precisely. Bryman and Bell (2015) perceives correlation as a tool to measure the

strength of a relationship between two variables. The book introduces a classic method

associated with correlation analysis called “Pearson’s r” which is used to test relationships

between interval/ratio variables. Some features of this measurement are followed to be

mentioned. For example, from the perspective of Pearson’s r, the coefficient is considered as

an effective way to judge how strong the relationship is. More precisely, coefficient is a

measure in the scale between 1 and 0. When coefficient is 0, it means the relationship

between the two variables is nonexistent. When coefficient reached 1, which means a perfect

relationship appeared (Bryman and Bell, 2015). In other words, close to 0 means that the

relationship becomes weaker (Bryman and Bell, 2015; Gallhofer and Saris, 2014), and close

to 1 means that the relationship becomes stronger (Byrman and Bell, 2015). A negative or

positive correlation can reflect the direction of a relationship. It is certainly that if none of

correlation exists between variables, it is unlikely to form an obvious pattern on the diagram

(Bryman and Bell, 2015).

41

Page 42: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.7.3 Multiple Regression Analysis

Montgomery, Peck and Vining (2012) defined the term regression analysis as a statistical

technique which is used to investigate and mold the relationship between dependent and

independent variables. The scale of adopting regression methods is huge and various, but the

field of statistical study is the place where used regression models mostly. Firstly, regression

can be simply perceived as a tool to determine the relationship between x and y. The simple

linear regression predicts how Y is related to X in a linear form, where X represents

independent variables and Y represents the dependent variable. When a regression model

includes more than one variable, the so-called “multiple regression model” will be adopted

under this situation. In other words, the multiple regression analysis focuses on one single

dependent variable and multiple independent variables. It aims to see how the dependent

variable is determined by the independent variables (Montgomery, Peck and Vining, 2012).

When square the value r of Pearson’s r, “R2” is produced in this way. It has a statistical name

: coefficient of determination, which measures the strength of the relationship between the

dependent variable and at least two independent variables. Similar with r, R2 also lies

between 0 and 1. The feature of the coefficient of determination is that it explains variance in

percentage. For example, a model with R2 = 0.8 explained 80% of the variance of the

dependent variable (Byrman and Bell, 2015; Montgomery, Peck and Vining, 2012). F-test is

a test model for linear regression that involves a null hypothesis and explains a zero variance

in the dependent variable. In other words, R2 = 0. The variance will increase if the sample

means are more different. One can therefore say that the value of F is high when the

variability is high. Importantly, if the computed F value is greater than the tabled F-value, one

can reject the null hypothesis (Schumacker and Tomek, 2013). Moreover, the beta coefficient

(β) and p-value are two key elements to test the significance of the relationship between

variables. For β-value which is used to see the slope or direction of the relationship. Simply, a

β-value less than zero means that the relationship is negative, and a β-value over zero means

that the relationship is positive. As to P-value, which is considered as important as β-value.

42

Page 43: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

The concept of p-value is that if it is lower than the significance level of 0.05, the relationship

between the variables is significant (Schumacker and Tomek, 2013).

4.8 Quality Criteria

4.8.1 Validity

Validity is one of the measures to the quality of the study. It states that validity is what

reflects the completeness through the related conclusions. One of the important types of

validity in quantitative study is measurement validity, which is also named as construct

validity. It is suitable for social scientific concepts and which is presented by the degree of

connection between concept and its measures. In other words, it means if the measure can

represent the concept. When a result shows that there is no relationship between two

variables, the reason behind might be the wrong setting of theory itself and which influences

the related hypothesis, or the measure is invalid. A problem here will cause the findings of

the study negatively affected and lower the acceptance of the study to some extent.

Reliability is one point to examine validity, since it shows whether the measure is effective or

not from a standard of stableness (reliability) (Bryman and Bell, 2015). In this paper, the

authors searched and collected theoretical information that they thought are relevant to the

study. To make sure the validity of the study, the authors discussed their choices of theories

(low-quality delivery, low-quality online customer service and low-quality website design)

and the related hypothesis that they are going to use to test on the concept (online customer

experience) with the professionals in the area. According to the feedback, the authors make

some changes to the necessary parts and therefore ensure the construct validity of the study.

Internal validity is an important criterion for researchers to ensure in quantitative study.

According to Bryman and Bell (2015), internal validity shows the causality of the study. This

stays in line with the nature of social science study, which means to find the reason for a

specific phenomenon that the researchers are interested in the study. In detail, internal

validity aims to measure if the statement on the relationship between the variables

(independent variables and dependent variables) is real and if the related independent variable

43

Page 44: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

is the only incentive (this means, without other interferences) to the change of the dependent

variable (Bryman and Bell, 2015). As the survey of the study will be conducted through a

cross-sectional design, there will be a problem that the direction of the causal influence is not

so clear since the theoretical information about independent variables and the dependent

variable are both collected and presented (Bryman and Bell, 2015). To ensure a clear

direction shown from the independent variables to the dependent variable, the authors

generalize the theoretical information for related hypothesis deduction in the part of

conceptual framework and follow it to present the suggested research model. Meanwhile, to

ensure the degree of relationship between variables, the correlation analysis is considered and

used by the authors.

4.8.2 Reliability

Reliability is mainly responsible for concerning if the content of the new research is similar

or repeatable to the previous studies. In fact, reliability is especially applicable for

quantitative study. Simply, it is a tool to see if the measures of concepts are consistent. In

other words, if someone can evaluate the reliability of the measure of a concept, the process

that makes up that measure must be replicable by other people. Accordingly, reliability is

naturally connected with validity since the evaluation of the validity of measurement regards

a reliable measure as the premise. Importantly, both the reliability and the validity of

measurement are fundamentally associated with the adequacy of measures, which is most

obvious in the quantitative study (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

However, the lack of coherence may occur during measuring each respondents’ questions in a

multiple-item way, that the indicators may be irrelevant to the same things. Thus, in order to

make all indicators associated with each other, one needs to use a common method namely

Cronbach’s alpha to test the internal reliability. In general, the value equals or over 0.7 is

expected since which is seen as an acceptable level of the internal reliability (Bryman and

Bell, 2015).

44

Page 45: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.9 Ethical Issues

Ethical issues exist in a lot of business research, including the operation of the research. It is

considered important as it covers the integrity of a study and relevant subjects. In the

consideration of ethical issues, four ethical principles are essential for managers to consider

and understand, which are related to harm on participants, absence of informed consent,

invasion of privacy, and deception. Literally, the harm to participants is about harming

participants in various ways, such as physical harm, put pressure on participants, harm

participants esteem, mental damage and so on. Absence of informed consent connotes they

are put in an observation which is disguised or covert but they know nothing about it. The

principle indicates that even if the participants of the survey have known everything, they

have the right to be told the research process. As to invasion of privacy means and deception,

as their names shows, both reveal a risk of deceiving participants in aspects such as exposing

participants personal information, lying to them with fake information. Nevertheless, these

four ethical principles have more or less links with each other. For example, “it is difficult to

imagine how the principle of informed consent could be built into an investigation in which

research participants were deceived.” But one cannot deny their common importances in

business research (Bryman and Bell, 2015).

In this study, when authors conduct the questionnaire, they have had the ethical responsibility

throughout the whole process. Not harming the participants, whether psychologically or

physically, has always been the social moral theme guarded by the authors. They disclose the

information of the entire questionnaire to all participants without hiding or deceiving. When

participants open the homepage of the questionnaire, they can clearly see one instruction

telling them all their personal information is anonymous. Also, participants can click the

button to leave this webpage at will which means they are not enforced or threaten to answer

the survey. The authors consciously make sure not to bring pressure to participants.

45

Page 46: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

4.10 Societal Issues

Considering the social aspect, the research shows that it is not influenced by a study’s

scientific quality so much. In fact, it is kind of difficult to measure social impacts which come

from research. However, as stated by Bornmann (2012), there are still several indicators for

social considerations that are accessible for researchers in a study. One of the indicators is

called economic benefit, which is about the effectiveness to improve the productivity of the

society. There is also a wide concern of economic benefit in a specific research area

(Bornmann, 2012). In this study, it aims to give online customers better experience in the

related context, however, this result can not be transported by the authors themselves. The

authors are the mediators of the study contribution while the E-commerce companies are the

direct influencers of the research. Therefore, this would raise a social concern, which is about

how they will use the study result. When they see the chance of economic benefit that they

can get through the result, whether they will work hard to solve the issues that online

customers already have and therefore make a win-win situation or they will focus on their

own benefit obtaining and deceive customers by solutions that are not truly effective to the

issues. It is hard to ensure this on the side of authors. Besides, there is also a probability that

when online customer experience is improved by the study, people might give more time to

online shopping. This would make the productivity of the society negatively influenced to

some extent and therefore suppress the anticipated economic benefit, which related to another

societal issue. Nevertheless, Since the topic in this study is about online customer experience,

therefore, the study can be still considered to contribute to the economy as it is anticipated to

give some insight to business to improve online customer service and therefore improve their

own performance as the contribution to the economy. The fact is that the study is considered

not so big so as to influence society on a large scale. In addition, most of the E-commerce

companies in the world are committed to business operation legally and the related gains. In

this aspect, one can argue that the study could make a positive effect on the development of

the economy in the society and which is useful to improve the online customer service

through different aspects. Meanwhile, people are more than an individual, they have family

members, friends etc. Therefore, one can say that it is not so easy and general that a huge

group of people are negatively influenced by the study and make bad impacts on society.

46

Page 47: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

5. Results

5.1 Descriptive Statistics

There are totally 78 respondents answering the questionnaire. Through control questions, it

shows that all of the respondents replied “Yes” to the question of “Do you shop online”. As

the topic of the study is about online customer experience, this means all of the respondents

can be included in the study. This question is important as it ensures the respondents are all

relevant to the study. However, only 77 answers will be used for the study, since there is a

respondent who does not complete the whole questionnaire which makes the answer invalid.

In this questionnaire, most of the respondents are aged between 18-25 which occupied 73.1%

and the following are between 26-35 which occupied 20.5%. The lowest number of

respondents are those aged between 36-45 as 2.6% while the rest of them are aged under 18

as 3.8% of the whole. The distribution of respondents in gender are almost at an average

level, with females slightly ahead with 52.6% while male occupied 46.2% of the whole

respondents. Through the questionnaire, the main force for the answers are respondents who

live in Sweden, which is 81.8% of the whole. In the education background, half of the

respondents are undergraduates. Besides, monthly income less than 10000 SEK are the

majority of the respondents in this questionnaire.

47

Page 48: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

In table 2 it shows the descriptive statistics through the questionnaire. The descriptive statistic

indicates the central tendency and which can be measured by three values as arithmetic mean,

mode and median. From table 3, the central tendency is shown as from 1 to 5, since the

questionnaire uses the five-point likert scale as the measurement of the questions, which 1

represents for strongly disagree and 5 represents for strongly agree. First of all, look at the

mean value, the results are all around 3 and 4, which indicates positive results through an

average level (closer to strongly agree). The relatively high average results shows a relatively

high consistency between the respondents and the statements. On the dependent variable,

the highest value of mean is positioned at OCE1 as 4.38, which indicates the importance of

the item in OCE and its impacts on OCE. Meanwhile, on independent variables, while the

highest value positioned at LQWD1 as 4.42, which proves the importance of the statement

among all independent variables averagely and proves the importance of the independent

variable (LQWD) to dependent variable (OCE) to some extent. Meanwhile, as a more stable

measure, median values are whether 4 or 5, which enhance the acceptance of the result. In the

table, the mode values are also high as 4 or 5 for all of the items while the measurement of

dispersion can be seen from the figure of standard deviation. The item with highest standard

deviation is LQD2, which accounts for 1.110 as a high variability. The item with lowest

standard deviation is OCE1, which accounts for 0.812 as a low variability. Skewness means a

status of asymmetry. All of the amount lies between -3 to 3 which can be accepted. Most of

the values are closer to -1, which indicates a left-skewed distribution. In other words, a

negative skewness shown. This means, there are extreme values on the left-hand side of the

curve. Lastly, the value of kurtosis indicates the sharpness of the distribution. In table 3, The

data all lie between positive 3.29 to negative 3.29, which are acceptable. In detail, the value

that larger than 0 is more than the value that is smaller than 0. This means the distribution of

the data is sharper and more concentrated. There is also data that is closer to 0, such as 0.376

that is positioned at OCE1, which shows data that is close to the normal distribution.

48

Page 49: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics

5.2 Correlation Statistics

5.2.1 Test of Validity

Table 3: Test of Validity

(Correlation Analysis)

49

Page 50: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Variable

Low-Quality

Delivery

Low-Quality Online

Customer Service

Low-Quality

Website Design

Low-Quality Delivery

1 ,679** ,569**

Low-Quality Online Customer

Service

,679** 1 ,623**

Low-Quality Website Design

,569** ,623** 1

** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

In table 4, a correlation analysis among total 3 items are shown. The figure of the Pearson

coefficient presents the degree of relationship between the items as weak or strong. Through

the table, all of the values of the pearson coefficient are closer to 1, which means there is a

strong relationship between two variables. Meanwhile, the positive correlation in the table

presents a positive relationship between each variable. The highest correlation is between

low-quality delivery and low-quality online customer service, while the lowest correlation is

between low-quality delivery and low-quality website design. All of the factors are

significant at 0.01 level. Therefore, as the degree of the relationship between variables are

reflected, the validity of the study is proved to some extent.

5.2.2 Test of Reliability

Table 4: Test of Reliability

(Cronbach’s Alpha)

Variable

Number of items Cronbach’s alpha

50

Page 51: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Online Customer Experience 6 0.863

Low-Quality Delivery 4 0.746

Low-Quality Online Customer Service

6 0.835

Low-Quality Website Design

5 0.866

As mentioned before, Cronbach’s Alpha is a commonly used method for testing the

reliability of research (Bryman and Bell, 2015). In other words, testing the internal reliability

through Cronbach’s alpha has the potential to enhance the links between all the indicators

shown in the table 4. According to the suggested criteria, the value = or >0.7 is expected to

see an acceptable level of the internal reliability (Bryman and Bell, 2015). In table 4, it is

clear to see the value of Cronbach’s alpha for each variable is over 0.7 insofar four variables

are involved with acceptable levels of the internal reliability. In specific, the independent

variable of low-quality website design reached the highest value 0.866 despite the other two

variables meaning low-quality online customer service and online customer experience also

reached the value over 0.8 respectively. The table of cronbach’s alpha shows only

low-quality delivery interpretes a relatively low value, however, its value has reached over

0.7. Throughout the column of number of items, the test of reliability considers all of the

items related to the four variables.

5.3 Multiple Regression Analysis (For The Hypothesis-Testing)

51

Page 52: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Table 5: Multiple Regression Analysis

B Sig.

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

(All)

Independent

Variable

Hypothesis

Low-quality

delivery

H1: Low-quality

delivery negatively

affects online

customer

experiences.

0.495 (.000)

0.045 (.706)

Low-quality

online customer

service

H2: Low-quality

online customer

service negatively

affects online

customer

experiences.

0.647 (.000)

0.453 (.001)

Low-quality

website design

H3: Low-quality

website design

negatively affects

0.571 (.000)

0.263 (.022)

52

Page 53: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

online customer

experiences.

R Square 0.245

0.419 0.326 0.467

Adjusted R

Square

0.235

0.411 0.317 0.444

Std. Error of the

Estimate

0.606 0.528 0.568 0.516

F-value 23.984 54.030 36.324 20.989

Degrees of

Freedom

1 1 1 3

Dependent Variable: Online Customer Experience

Significant at level = 95% (p < .05)

In table 5, the multiple regression analysis table involves four important models in total, they

are model 1, 2, 3, 4. The former three models aim to test the individual significance of each

of independent variables to the dependent variable. It is easily observed that all of three

independent variables (low-quality delivery, low-quality online customer service, low-quality

website design) can individually significantly affect online customer experience as they are

all with the significant P-value of .000 which is smaller than 0.05. As to the fourth model,

which is used for examining if the hypotheses are accepted by computing all the independent

variables together with one dependent variable i.e. online customer experience. In this table,

F-value was significant at the given level of significance P < 0.05 for all models. It is

consistent with the R square that all models (0.235; 0.411; 0.317; 0.444) are lying in the

proper zone from 0 to 1 (Byrman and Bell, 2015; Montgomery, Peck and Vining, 2012).

However, when looking at the fourth model, it shows not all hypotheses are with significant P

value (<0.05), that H2 (0.001) and H3 (0.022) are with the significant levels since both values

are less than 0.05 but H1 is with its p-value of 0.706 which is more than 0.05. The β value

53

Page 54: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

regarding the three hypotheses in the forth model is 0.045; 0.453; 0.263, which means these

three relationships of the independent variables and the dependent variable are shown

positive insofar as the negative direction between three factors (low-quality delivery,

low-quality online customer service, low-quality website design) and online customer

experience. (The detailed explanation is shown in the questionnaire design and discussion.)

5.4 Hypothesis Results

Based on the results in table 5, one could infer that H1 is rejected but both of H2 and H3 are

failed to reject. See table 6 below:

Table 6: Hypothesis Results

The Significance Level The Result Of Hypothesis

H1: Low-quality delivery

negatively affects online

customer experiences.

0.706

Reject

H2: Low-quality online

customer service negatively

affects online customer

experiences.

0.001

Fail to reject

H3: Low-quality website

design negatively affects

online customer

experiences.

0.022

Fail to reject

54

Page 55: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

6. Discussion

As questionnaire design introduced, all the questions in regards to independent variables are

designed with a “double negative” style. Simply put, the sentence is like a double negative

sentence because it consists of two parts: the customer’s negative attitude and terrible things.

These sentences can directly express customer negative attitudes when facing low-quality

items or events. In other words, when a participant clicks "agree", the strength of confirming

the negative attitude is enhanced. Coming back to the multiple regression analysis table 5, it

shows the β value for model 1 (0.495), 2 (0.647), 3 (0.571), and 4 (0.045; 0.453; 0.263) are

all positive. This is because the sentences of independent variables are made of two negative

parts, the attribute of the sentence itself is positive, so the order of the Likert scale is the same

as that of OCE’s questions. In other words, it means the answers for both dependent variables

and independent variables tend to the same direction "agree". Yet the contents of all

independent questions mean negative attitudes just as mentioned above, so the relationship

between three independent variables and the dependent variable is still negative. Plus the

p-value for all models is significant (less than 0.05) except for H1, one can therefore confirm

each of the relationships between the factors and OCE is significant and negative. To the

three hypotheses, one can say H2 and H3 cannot be rejected but reject H1.

6.1 Low-Quality Delivery The quality of delivery is one part where online customers are concerned with (Niu, Wang,

Lee and Chen, 2019). In the study, there are several areas under low-quality delivery that the

authors are interested in, which are shipping fees and delivery time, while shipping fees is

measured by the items of free shipping fees (Lewis, Singh and Fay, 2006) and company sizes

(Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013), delivery time is measured by the items of its windows

55

Page 56: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

charges (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils ,2018; Moons, Ramaekers, Caris and Arda,

2017) and home delivery failure (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018). In the study

of low-quality delivery, the authors want to figure out the relationship between low-quality

delivery and online customer experience. Generally, from the related SPSS table 5 for

multiple regression, though the variable itself has a significance p-value to prove its ability to

affect OCE, the data shows that H1 for low-quality delivery can not be accepted since its

p-value is more than 0.05 as a no significance meaning. Meanwhile, the value of cronbach

alpha of the measure of LQD is 0.746, though the value lies in the range of acceptance for

internal reliability (over 0.7) (Bryman and Bell, 2015), however, it needs to notice that the

value is the lowest among all of the variables. The result also shows that low-quality delivery

has the highest correlation with low-quality online customer service as 0.679** and the

lowest correlation with low-quality website design as 0.569**, which shows an unstable

relationship with other variables as well. In detail, the descriptive statistics in table 2 indicates

a relatively high dispersion between the data and its average value as low-quality delivery is

the only variable with values of standard deviation around 1 in the study, which means it has

a relatively high variability between its data and mean value. This means, people’s attitude

regarding low-quality delivery in online customer experience is scattered. Besides, as the

mean value represents the average level of the respondents in the case, it reflects the

relatively high instability of two items, which are LQD2 and LQD3. The result of the

questionnaire also shows that there are quite a group of people who choose the middle option

in the likert scale for both questions, which is no less than the people who choose 4 or 5 in

the likert scale. As the items testing in the case are both related to shipping fees (Ramaekers,

Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018; Moons, Ramaekers, Caris and Arda, 2017; Chen, 2013;

Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013) one can argue that shipping fees might not be so important to

their experience in online shopping. In other words, they are more ambiguous on those items.

In contrast, the questions for LQD1 and LQD4 gain relatively stable answers from people

through both SPSS results and the questionnaire. The standard deviations are relatively low

and it is obvious that more answers are on the high level of likert scale (Strongly agree).

LQD1 relates to the item of high shipping fees (Guo et al. , 2020) while LQD4 relates to the

item of home delivery failure (Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018). One can say

that the result implies a tendency to get commodities smoothly instead of getting

commodities cheaply.

56

Page 57: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

6.2 Low-Quality Online Customer Service

Online customer service is an important tool in e-commerce since it connects customers and the

business through the related offering (Lim and Dubinsky, 2004). Through the result in table5

which run by multiple regression, it shows that the effect of low-quality online customer on

online customer experience is confirmed through the significance shown from its p-value

.000 (less than 0.05) and it is certain that low-quality online customer service has a negative

impact on online customer experience with the highest p-value 0.001 among all independent

variables (less than 0.05), which means, H2 is failed to be rejected. Through the data,

low-quality online customer experience has relative high correlation with other two

independent variables, which are 0.679** with low-quality delivery and 0.623** with

low-quality website design, which indicates the validity of the concept with a clear

relationship directed. Meanwhile, the cronbach's alpha for low-quality is the second highest

among both dependent and independent variables as 0.835 which shows the concept is with

acceptable internal validity. According to the results on descriptive statistics, the highest

mean value of LQOCS positioned at LQOCS6 as 4.35. This means, in average, online

customers are confirmed as very sensitive to security/privacy concerns in online shopping

since it destroy the trust of them to the shopping site (Pandey and Chawla 2018, Coşar, Panyi

and Varga, 2017). The next important item in LQOCS should be on LQOCS4 as 4.21, which

indicates that the function of the support department in online shopping cannot be ignored

(McLean and Wilson, 2016). Such a result is considered reasonable since it is consistent with

the fact that online shopping operates on a visual platform and the main function of online

customer support is to build the bridge between customers and E-commerce companies(Lim

and Dubinsky, 2004). In contrast, the lowest value of mean is in LQOCS3 as 3.99. So one can

say that a long product information searching time is not so serious an issue to online

customers, at least for utilitarian products (McLean and Wilson, 2016).

57

Page 58: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

6.3 Low-Quality Website Design

By reviewing all responses to the survey questions related to low-quality website design

through the former tables, there is a fact which is easy to discover, that most participants hold

similar strong and positive attitudes when being asked if surrounding terrible website design

on shopping sites could bring them terrible emotions. From table 2 one can see the high and

stable value of mean and mode from LQWD1 to LQWD5. Among all of LQWD statements,

LQWD1 has the highest mean value 4.42 despite the rest of LQWD have similarly high

values of the mean no lower than 4.22. Based on the given theory of descriptive statistics,

when the value of the mean is lying between 3 and 4 means its involved answers are inclined

to the "strongly agree" (Bryman and Bell, 2015). In other words, most respondents agree bad

website design can more or less cause bad online experiences. Also, since the median value is

a stable measure that is presented as 5 in all LQWDs, one can further confirm that the

statements are agreed by most participants. In other words, one can also infer that online

customers are less likely to trust a terrible navigation system. This does not rule out the

possibility of a crisis of trust of the navigation that would truly happen in online shopping

(Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015). In the Cronbach’s alpha table, it is obvious to find LQWD

has the highest value with 0.866 among all variables, which implies it has high and strong

reliability in regards to confirming its similarity and consistency with the previous study.

Accordingly, the strong significance value in model 3 (.000) and model 4 (.022) shown in the

final multiple regression analysis further indicates that LQWD has a significant impact on

online customer experience, which in turn improves the fact of that online customers are

highly likely holding negative attitudes when facing low-quality website design. Simply put,

hypothesis three is failed to reject, and which proves that customers still consider an inferior

website design that can negatively influence their online experiences (Hausman and Siekpe,

2009; Hasan, 2016; Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015). Moreover, the second-highest value

,623** the correlation analysis table tells the truth that in this study, there is an effective and

strong connection between low-quality website design and low-quality online customer

service. The important finding by reviewing the tables is the low-quality website design may

have the strongest negative impacts on customer online experiences, and indeed, all the

settings in low quality mentioned in the survey can take negative effects on customers, which

is also something that is highly consistent with the previous study, this includes such as the

58

Page 59: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

inferior navigation setting, inferior information design, and inferior visual design (Hausman

and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016).

7. Conclusion

Based on the findings, H2 and H3 cannot be rejected but H1 needs to be rejected. In other

words, it is hard to reject that both low-quality online customer service and low-quality

website design have negative impacts on online customer experience. One can therefore say

that even in the context of rapid technological development, modern online shoppers have not

changed their aversion to low-quality elements, that the view that low-quality online

customer service and low-quality website design negatively affect OCE has not changed. In

short, it is clear to see low-quality website design plays an important role in influencing

customer emotions through the inferior design elements such as inferior navigation, and for

online customer service in low quality would bring customer negative experiences through

inadequate service equipment such as a low security paying system. Besides, one discovers

that there is a strong and effective connection between low-quality website design and

low-quality online customer service as two independent variables. The new model confirms

what the results tell.

59

Page 60: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Figure 2. Research Model

7.1 Theoretical Implications

Theoretically, the study confirms the negative effect on the dependent variable online

customer experience from the independent variable low-quality online customer service (H2)

(Joines, Scherer and Scheufele, 2003; McLean and Wilson, 2016; Rita, Oliveira and Farisa,

2019; Vos et al., 2014; Pandey and Chawla, 2018; Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017) ) and

low-quality website design (H3) (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016; Roghanizad and

Neufeld, 2015), while it failed to accept H1 which related to the negative impact on online

customer experience from low-quality delivery (Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017; Kim, Dekker

and Heij, 2017; Gümüş, Li, Oh and Ray, 2013; Ramaekers, Caris, Moons and van Gils, 2018;

Lewis, Singh and Fay, 2006) . The study also shows that all of the independent variables are

closely correlated with each other by correlation analysis. For low-quality delivery, though

the hypothesis is rejected, the study still confirms the result from previous study about the

negative impacts on online customer experience from the practical issues of high shipping

fees and home delivery failure since the answers of respondents support the idea. On the

other hand, the aspect of delivery time window and the different attitudes on shipping charges

in relation to company size is not so important to influence the online customer experience

negatively. Regarding low-quality online customer service, the hypothesis is with the highest

60

Page 61: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

significance shown with P-value 0.001 and the clear direction of relationship with β-value

0.453, which is the most effective independent variable to the dependent variable that is

connected by the negative relationship between. Importantly, the result confirms the

seriousness of security/privacy concerns to negative impacts on online customer experience

and the importance of online customer support to online customer experience, which is

consistent with previous study (Pandey and Chawla 2018, Coşar, Panyi and Varga, 2017,

McLean and Wilson, 2016). As stated by Vos et al., (2014), the result about security/privacy

concerns raise a thinking to study more on trust building in online shopping (Vos et al.,

2014). Lasety, from the study of low-quality website design, it significantly confirmed the

generation of negative attitude on the shopping site in a low-quality website design setting,

especially for LQWD1 (improper presenting of WD with dissatisfaction) and LQWD5 (trust

and low-quality navigation settings). The related hypothesis is accepted with the p-value

0.022 (less than 0.05) which states there is a negative relationship between low-quality

website design and online customer experience (Hausman and Siekpe, 2009; Hasan, 2016;

Roghanizad and Neufeld, 2015).

7.2 Managerial Implications

The findings of the study connotes that regardless of developing the technology in the

modern world, one has still not changed yet is online customer minds. In other words,

E-commerce companies should keep studying and understanding their customers. Even if the

increasing number of online items may emerge in the future, the e-business cannot be sloppy

in maintaining consumer relations. With this consideration, the authors collected some

approaches in aspects of delivery, online customer service and website design from current

marketing research, and thought they would be more or like applicable for e-business to

operate online customer relationships in some cases.

Firstly is about the pricing in delivery. van Gils, Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster (2018)

believed that a fast and cheap delivery can easily please customers (van Gils, Ramaekers,

Caris and de Koster, 2018). Although the pricing work is not simple, one suggests some

companies put their eyes on executing free shipping fees as customers are normally sensitive

to it. They further discussed the delivery options, and considered that “Awareness of the

61

Page 62: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

influence of individual order picking planning problems on the overall performance is

required to manage operations, resulting in enhanced customer service” (van Gils,

Ramaekers, Caris and de Koster, 2018). Importantly, in designing the online customer service

and website, the firms should note that there are many individuals hold different attitudes or

perceptions towards the type of services or products, in turn, customer experience under the

online context could be shaped in this way. Nevertheless, owning a high level of online

environment is always good for e-business. The former sections in this study have discussed

the side effects customers will have when experiencing low-quality website design. Good

communication with customers and suitable website design is conducive to leave customers a

good impression on the website. For example, companies can design the website which is

specialized in presenting suitable information on web pages based on customers’ different

favors as well as their daily browse history (Kim, Dekker and Heij, 2017).

8. Limitations and Recommendation for the future research

8.1 Limitations There are some limitations in the study that would be discussed here. First of all, due to the

limited time and effort it can take to study, the sample size that the authors collect is not quite

large, which might lead the result of study biased to some extent. Meanwhile, the research

design cross-sectional in this paper is not so effective on generalization of the sample which

also needs to be considered. The second limitation of this paper is the authors did not

consider the control variables in conducting the multiple regression analysis. It is mainly

attributed to the fact that the authors intend to mainly focus on examining the response of

participants towards those questions in the domain of the subject although it is hard to

acknowledge adding this part could strengthen the arguments in the final discussion.

62

Page 63: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

8.2 Recommendation For The Future Research

Since e-commerce is a research area that researchers are highly studying in recent years, one

suggests to continue the study of online customer experience in the future research. Perhaps

researchers can be inspired by the relationship between two independent variables to dig out

more relevant items to learn online consumer experience in a new way. More precisely, we

learned there is a strong relationship between low-quality website design and low-quality

online customer service in conducting this study. And the authors interestingly found when

talking about online customer negative attitudes, both factors dug out the findings related to

the trust from different aspects, and the dissatisfaction in regards to low-quality online

customer service. Thus, future research can try to use a similar way to explore more items

and gather them to sum up more new relationships in the domain of online customer

experience.

Reference List

● Akalamkam, K. and Mitra, J., 2017. Consumer Pre-purchase Search in Online

Shopping: Role of Offline and Online Information Sources. Business Perspectives

and Research, 6(1), pp.42-60.

● Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., & Janiszewski, C. (1997). Interactive Home Shopping:

Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic

Marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61(3), pp.38–53.

● Banasiewicz, A., 2013. Marketing Database Analytics. New York: Routledge.

● Bauer, H., Falk, T. and Hammerschmidt, M., 2006. eTransQual: A transaction

process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping. Journal of

Business Research, 59(7), pp.866-875.

● Bhatnagar, A., Misra, S., & Rao, H.R. (2000). On Risk, Convenience, and Internet

Shopping Behavior. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the

ACM, 43(11), 98–110.

63

Page 64: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

● Bhattacharya, A., Srivastava, M. and Verma, S., 2018. Customer Experience in

Online Shopping: A Structural Modeling Approach. Journal of Global Marketing,

32(1), pp.3-16.

● Bilgihan, A., Okumus, F., Nusair, K. and Bujisic, M., 2013. Online experiences: flow

theory, measuring online customer experience in e-commerce and managerial

implications for the lodging industry. Information Technology & Tourism, 14(1),

pp.49-71.

● Bleier, A., Harmeling, C. and Palmatier, R., 2018. Creating Effective Online

Customer Experiences. Journal of Marketing, 83(2), pp.98-119.

● Bornmann, L., 2012. Measuring the societal impact of research.EMBO reports, 13(8),

pp.673-676.

● Bryman, A., and Cramer, D. (2012). Quantitative Data Analysis with IBM SPSS 17,

18 & 19: A Guide for Social Scientists. London: Taylor and Franci

● Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Method. Fourth edition. Oxford:

Oxford University Press

● Chen, Y., 2013. Fuzzy Flexible Delivery and Pickup Problem with Time Windows.

Procedia Computer Science, 17, pp.379-386.

● Coşar, C., Panyi, K. and Varga, A., 2017. Try Not to Be Late! - the Importance of

Delivery Service in Online Shopping. Organizations and Markets in Emerging

Economies, 8(2), pp.177-192.

● Gallhofer, I. and Saris, W., 2014. Design, Evaluation, And Analysis Of

Questionnaires For Survey Research. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.

● Gartner (2011). Gartner Customer 360 Summit. Available at:

<https://www.gartner.com/imagesrv/summits/docs/na/

customer-360/C360_2011_brochure_FINAL.pdf.> [Accessed 27 August 2020].

● Gillham, B., 2015. Developing A Questionnaire. London: Bloomsbury.

● Goos, P. and Meintrup, D., 2015. Statistics With JMP: Graphs, Descriptive Statistics,

And Probability. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated

● Guo, Y., Hu, X., Zou, Y., Li, S., Cheng, W. and Li, Z., 2020. Maximizing E-Tailers’

Sales Volume through the Shipping-Fee Discount and Product Recommendation

System. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2020, pp.1-14.

64

Page 65: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

● Gümüş, M., Li, S., Oh, W. and Ray, S., 2013. Shipping Fees or Shipping Free? A

Tale of Two Price Partitioning Strategies in Online Retailing. Production and

Operations Management, 22(4), pp.758-776.

● Hasan, B., 2016. Perceived irritation in online shopping: The impact of website design

characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, pp.224-230.

● Hausman, A. and Siekpe, J., 2009. The effect of web interface features on consumer

online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, [online] 62(1), pp.5-13.

● Jaiswal, S. and Singh, A., 2020. Influence of the Determinants of Online Customer

Experience on Online Customer Satisfaction. Paradigm, 24(1), pp.41-55.

● Joines, J., Scherer, C. and Scheufele, D., 2003. Exploring motivations for consumer

Web use and their implications for e-commerce. Journal of Consumer Marketing,

20(2), pp.90-108.

● Kim, T., Dekker, R. and Heij, C., 2017. Cross-Border Electronic Commerce: Distance

Effects and Express Delivery in European Union Markets. International Journal of

Electronic Commerce, 21(2), pp.184-218.

● Küster, I., Vila, N. and Canales, P., 2016. How does the online service level influence

consumers’ purchase intentions before a transaction? A formative approach.

European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(3), pp.111-120..

● Lewis, M., Singh, V. and Fay, S., 2006. An Empirical Study of the Impact of

Nonlinear Shipping and Handling Fees on Purchase Incidence and Expenditure

Decisions. Marketing Science, 25(1), pp.51-64.

● Li, Z., Lu, Q. and Talebian, M., 2014. Online versus bricks-and-mortar retailing: a

comparison of price, assortment and delivery time. International Journal of

Production Research, 53(13), pp.3823-3835.

● Lim, H. and Dubinsky, A., 2004. Consumers' perceptions of e-shopping

characteristics: an expectancy-value approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 18(7),

pp.500-513.

● Martin, E. and Bridgmon, D., 2012. Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods:

From Hypothesis to Results. 1st Ed. Somerset: Jossey-Bass.

● Martin, J., Mortimer, G. and Andrews, L., 2015. Re-examining online customer

experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk. Journal of Retailing and

Consumer Services, 25, pp.81-95.

65

Page 66: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

● McLean, G. and Wilson, A., 2016. Evolving the online customer experience … is

there a role for online customer support?. Computers in Human Behavior, 60,

pp.602-610.

● Mohsin, M., 2020. 10 Online Shopping Statistics You Need To Know In 2020

[Infographic]. [online] Oberlo.com. Available at:

<https://www.oberlo.com/blog/online-shopping-statistics> [Accessed 27 August

2020].

● Montgomery, D., Peck, E. and Vining, G., 2012. Introduction To Linear Regression

Analysis. 5th ed

● Moons, S., Ramaekers, K., Caris, A. and Arda, Y., 2017. Integration of order picking

and vehicle routing in a B2C e-commerce context. Flexible Services and

Manufacturing Journal, 30(4), pp.813-843.

● Niu, B., Wang, J., Lee, C. and Chen, L., 2019. “Product + logistics” bundling sale

and co-delivery in cross-border e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4),

pp.915-941.

● Ou, C. and Sia, C., 2010. Consumer trust and distrust: An issue of website design.

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(12), pp.913-934.

● Pandey, S. and Chawla, D., 2018. Online customer experience (OCE) in clothing

e-retail. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(3),

pp.323-346.

● Papagiannidis, S., Pantano, E., See-To, E., Dennis, C. and Bourlakis, M., 2017. To

immerse or not? Experimenting with two virtual retail environments. Information

Technology & People, 30(1), pp.163-188.

● Parvatiyar, A., & Sheth, J. N. (2001). Customer relationship management: Emerging

practice, process, and discipline. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 3, 1–34.

● Peterson, R.A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B.J. (1997). Exploring the

Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing. Journal of the Academy of

Marketing Science, 25( 4), 329–346.

● Ramaekers, K., Caris, A., Moons, S. and van Gils, T., 2018. Using an integrated order

picking-vehicle routing problem to study the impact of delivery time windows in

e-commerce. European TransportResearch Review, 10(2).

66

Page 67: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

● Rita, P., Oliveira, T. and Farisa, A., 2019. The impact of e-service quality and

customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping. Heliyon, 5(10),

p.e02690.

● Roghanizad, M., and Neufeld, D., 2015. Intuition, risk, and the formation of online

trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, pp.489-498.

● Rose, S., Hair, N. and Clark, M., 2011. Online Customer Experience: A Review of the

Business-to-Consumer Online Purchase Context. International Journal of

Management Reviews, 13(1), pp.24-39.

● Rose, S., Clark, M., Samouel, P. and Hair, N., 2012. Online Customer Experience in

e-Retailing: An empirical model of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of Retailing,

88(2), pp.308-322.

● Schumacker, R. and Tomek, S., 2013. Understanding Statistics Using R.

● Sierotowicz, T. and Sierotowicz, T., 2017. Scientific Foundation of Business Models

Theory: Research Traditions Approach. Axiomathes,.

● Singh, M., 2002. E-services and their role in B2C e-commerce. Managing Service

Quality: An International Journal, 12(6), pp.434-446.

● Statista. 2020. Digital Buyers Worldwide 2021 | Statista. [online] Available at:

<https://www.statista.com/statistics/251666/numberl-of-degital-buyers-worldwide/>

[Accessed 27 August 2020].

● van Gils, T., Ramaekers, K., Caris, A. and de Koster, R., 2018. Designing efficient

order picking systems by combining planning problems: State-of-the-art classification

and review. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), pp.1-15.

● Van Voorhis, C., and Morgan, B., (2007). Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb.

Psi Chi Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3, pp. 43-50.

● Vos, A., Marinagi, C., Trivellas, P., Eberhagen, N., Giannakopoulos, G. and Skourlas,

C., 2014. Electronic service quality in online shopping and risk reduction strategies.

Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 16(3), pp.170-186.

67

Page 68: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

Appendix 1

68

Page 69: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

69

Page 70: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

70

Page 71: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

71

Page 72: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

72

Page 73: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

73

Page 74: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

74

Page 75: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

75

Page 76: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

76

Page 77: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

77

Page 78: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

78

Page 79: Have you ever had a terrible online shopping experience?

79