Have We Got the Names "Right"?

30
Have We Got the Names “Right”? Why, Geekery & Logistics David P. Shorthouse

description

Delivered to Consortium of Northeastern Herbaria meeting workshop in Montreal, QC on Saturday, June 14, 2014 on use of scientific names in collections.

Transcript of Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Page 1: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Have We Got the Names “Right”?Why, Geekery & Logistics

David P. Shorthouse

Page 2: Have We Got the Names "Right"?
Page 3: Have We Got the Names "Right"?
Page 4: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Cryptantha celosioides (Eastwood) Paysoncock’s-comb cryptantha

©2011 Ryan Batten

Page 5: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Cryptantha nubigena var. celosioides (Eastwood) B. Boivin

Page 6: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Hemihomonyms

« If two different species, genera or other taxons have the same name, this name is a homonym. Homonyms are illegal if they belong to the same code of nomenclature. If same name belongs to different codes, it is a hemihomonym (Starobogatov, 1991). »

Page 7: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Pieris spp.Pieris japonica

Pieris rapae

Page 8: Have We Got the Names "Right"?
Page 9: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Darwin Core TermstaxonID | scientificNameID | acceptedNameUsageID | parentNameUsageID | originalNameUsageID | nameAccordingToID | namePublishedInID | taxonConceptID | scientificName | acceptedNameUsage | parentNameUsage | originalNameUsage | nameAccordingTo | namePublishedIn | namePublishedInYear | higherClassification | kingdom | phylum | class | order | family | genus | subgenus | specificEpithet | infraspecificEpithet | taxonRank | verbatimTaxonRank | scientificNameAuthorship | vernacularName | nomenclaturalCode | taxonomicStatus | nomenclaturalStatus | taxonRemarks

Identity, Nomenclature, Taxonomy, Taxon Concepts

Page 10: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Identification

Page 11: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

scientificName

« The full scientific name, with authorship and date information if known. When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined. This term should not contain identification qualifications, which should instead be supplied in the identificationQualifier term. »

ColeopteraCtenomys sociabilisQuercus agrifolia var. oxyadenia (Torr.) J.T. Howell

Page 12: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

identifiedBy

« A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups, or organizations who assigned the Taxon to the subject. »

Page 13: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

scientificNameID

« An identifier for the nomenclatural (not taxonomic) details of a scientific name. »

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:37829-1:1.3

Page 14: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

identificationQualifier

« A brief phrase or a standard term ("cf.", "aff.") to express the determiner's doubts about the Identification. »

1. For the determination Quercus aff. agrifolia var. oxyadenia, identificationQualifier would be "aff. agrifolia var. oxyadenia" with accompanying values "Quercus" in genus, "agrifolia" in specificEpithet, "oxyadenia" in infraspecificEpithet, and "var." in rank.

2. For the determination Quercus agrifolia cf. var. oxyadenia, identificationQualifier would be "cf. var. oxyadenia " with accompanying values "Quercus" in genus, "agrifolia" in specificEpithet, "oxyadenia" in infraspecificEpithet, and "var." in rank.

Page 15: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

genussubgenusspecificEpithetsubspecificEpithetscientificNameAuthorship

Page 16: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Nomenclature

Page 17: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

« The status related to the original publication of the name and its conformance to the relevant rules of nomenclature. It is based essentially on an algorithm according to the business rules of the code. It requires no taxonomic opinion.»

nomenclaturalStatus

nom. ambig., nom. illeg., nom. subnud.

nomenclaturalCode

Page 18: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

« A reference for the publication in which the scientificName was originally established under the rules of the associated nomenclaturalCode. »

namePublishedIn

namePublishedInIDnamePublishedInYear

Page 19: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

originalNameUsage

« The taxon name, with authorship and date information if known, as it originally appeared when first established under the rules of the associated nomenclaturalCode. The basionym (botany) or basonym (bacteriology) of the scientificName or the senior/earlier homonym for replaced names. »

Page 20: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Taxonomy

Page 21: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

acceptedNameUsage

« The full name, with authorship and date information if known, of the currently valid (zoological) or accepted (botanical) taxon. »

Page 22: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Classification

higherClassificationkingdomphylumclassorderfamily

parentNameUsageparentNameUsageIDtaxonomicStatus

Page 23: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Taxon Concepts

nameAccordingTonameAccordingToIDtaxonConceptIDclassorderfamily

Page 24: Have We Got the Names "Right"?
Page 25: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Darwin Core Extensions

Darwin Core Identification History

identificationID | identifiedBy | dateIdentified | identificationReferences | identificationRemarks | identificationQualifier | identificationVerificationStatus | typeStatus | taxonID | taxonConceptID | scientificName | scientificNameID | namePublishedIn | namePublishedInYear | namePublishedInID | nameAccordingTo | nameAccordingToID | acceptedNameUsage | parentNameUsage | originalNameUsage | higherClassification | kingdom | phylum | class | order | family | genus | subgenus | specificEpithet | infraspecificEpithet | taxonRank | verbatimTaxonRank | scientificNameAuthorship | vernacularName | nomenclaturalCode | taxonomicStatus | nomenclaturalStatus | taxonRemarks

Page 26: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Where Is there More Help?

TDWG ListservTaxacom ListservCanadensys Google Group

Page 27: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

So Where/How Do We Start?

Page 28: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

http://iphylo.blogspot.ca/2012/02/using-google-refine-and-taxonomic.html

Page 29: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

http://www.canadensys.net/refine/

Page 30: Have We Got the Names "Right"?

Let’s Get Organized…