Harvard to Manchin

download Harvard to Manchin

of 1

Transcript of Harvard to Manchin

  • 8/8/2019 Harvard to Manchin

    1/1

    February 5, 2010

    Governor Joe Manchin

    State Capitol Building

    1900 Kanawha Blvd. E.

    Charleston, WV 25305

    Dear Governor Manchin:

    I am Dr. Harvard Ayers, Archeologist at Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina. I conductedthe archeological field investigations of the Blair Mountain Battlefield over the last several years, finding over

    1,000 well-preserved artifacts that related to the 1921 battle in 17 different sites along the 10-mile battle front.

    My findings were instrumental in the decision of the Keeper of the National Register of Historic Places to place

    the battlefield on the National Register on March 30th of last year.

    When the Keeper expressed intent to delist the battlefield, I immediately engaged title attorney John Kennedy

    Bailey of Charleston to research the property owner records in Logan County, so that we might determine the

    validity of the State Historic Preservation Officer's (SHPO) list of battlefield owners and objectors.

    Amazingly, Mr. Bailey found two dead men on the list of owner-objectors, as well as two life estate holders

    (not fee-simple owners) and one woman who had sold her property two years before. Also, we discovered an

    additional 13 owners who had not been found by the SHPO's study. With these new data, and going from the

    SHPO's list, we determined that there were 62 owners and 25 objectors, a finding that would reverse the SHPO'sattempt to have the Blair Mountain Battlefield delisted.

    When Mr. Reid-Smith was told by the Keeper that it was his responsibility to take Mr. Bailey's analysis into

    account, he refused. So he stuck with a list that had two dead people, two life estates, and one seller of her

    property as evidence that the battlefield should be removed from the National Register.The Keeper, based

    solely on Mr. Reid-Smith's research, delisted the battlefield on December 30th. (bold italics added for

    emphasis -oc)

    Why was our clear evidence to the contrary not reviewed and evaluated by Mr. Reid-Smith as requested by the

    federal authorities? You can't "just say no" in those circumstances. Did Mr. Reid-Smith want to rob the many

    men who fought and died at that historic battle the honor of their sacrifice?

    I want you to know that Mr. Bailey and I are willing to testify concerning our property research, should there be

    hearings on this regrettable matter before the West Virginia House of Delegates. Such hearings have been

    recommended by Charleston Gazette Editor Jim Haught, and seem the only way out of this dilemma, given Mr.

    Reid-Smith's intransigence.

    It has also come to my attention that displays at the Museum are not at all accurately presented, an

    embarrassment to all who know the history of those matters. A question I have is, was there adequate oversight

    of those important historic displays?

    Respectfully,

    [signature]

    Harvard G. Ayers, Professor Emeritus

    Department of Anthropology

    Appalachian State University

    Boone, NC 28608

    Cc:

    Mike Caputo, Majority Whip

    Jim Haught, Editor, Charleston Gazette

    John Kennedy Bailey, Esquire