Harness Outdoors Infographic Final - WordPress.com

1
Australian National Incident Dataset September 14, 2018 to August 13, 2020 Scott McLean, Lauren Coventon, Paul Salmon Understanding and Preventing Led Outdoor Accidents Data System www.uploadsproject.org Incidents in the Outdoors: Harness (Outdoors) Number of incidents by severity Severity level and consequence Near miss (Potential Severity) Injury (Actual Severity) No Impact (Negligible) 1 - Minor (Short Term impact) 18 131 Moderate (Short to Medium term effects) 12 27 Serious (Medium to long term effects) 13 4 Severe (Serious long term effects or permanent disablement) 12 - Critical (Certain death or fatality) 5 - Local Government Facilities (2) Government to maintain equipment Regulators Standards (1) Qualifications are not mandated for staff Schools Knowledge (1) School was not aware of pre-existing injury Parents Communication (2) of pre-existing injury Decision (2) to send participant to camp with pre-existing injury Management Training (8) Unqualified; Inadequate training (e.g. for handovers or unexpected situations); Maintain qualification currency Staffing (5) Staff shortages; Use of external staff Program Location (3) Not prepared for activity; New location Suitability (3) Suitability for participant Group Teamwork (8) Communication; working together to brace/pull rope; attention Composition (2) Diverse participant capabilities Group Size (2) Leader to participation ratio Supervisor Communication (7) of instructions throughout activity Participant Experience (63) with activity or equipment Decisions (44) Decisions associated with misjudgment or excitement; Refusal to continue activity; Decision to act without instruction Resources Equipment & Clothing (50) Rough wire, equipment type, stiff harness webbing. new safety device, fastening hardness in correct spot Leader Communication (29) Instructions for conducting the activity safely, communication between staff Knowledge (23) Awareness of risks associated with the activity; Lack of skills; Knowledge of procedures Most frequently identified contributory factors associated with harness (outdoors) activities The values in brackets represent the number of times the contributory factor was identified. The values on the lines indicate the number of times the relationship was identified. Data are reported from National Incident Dataset with UPLOADS reporting restrictions applied. 1 1 1 1 1 3 Environment Terrain (44) Steep; hight; rock wall; soft/ hard landing strip; uneven 2 7 15 13 2 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 2 223 near miss & injury incidents reported Activity incident rate: 0.8 incidents reported / 1000 activity participation days Example activities: Abseiling, rock/wall climbing, high ropes, ziplining Incident types: 61 Near miss incidents, 162 Injuries (including, superficial, dislocation/ strain, bite/sting, burn, fracture, head trauma, crushing, wound-open) 1 1 1

Transcript of Harness Outdoors Infographic Final - WordPress.com

Page 1: Harness Outdoors Infographic Final - WordPress.com

Australian National Incident Dataset September 14, 2018 to August 13, 2020Scott McLean, Lauren Coventon, Paul Salmon

Understanding and Preventing Led Outdoor Accidents Data System

www.uploadsproject.org

Incidents in the Outdoors: Harness (Outdoors) Number of incidents by severity

Severity level and consequence Near miss(Potential Severity)

Injury(Actual Severity)

No Impact (Negligible) 1 -

Minor (Short Term impact) 18 131

Moderate (Short to Medium term effects) 12 27

Serious (Medium to long term effects) 13 4

Severe (Serious long term effects or permanent disablement) 12 -

Critical (Certain death or fatality) 5 -

Local Government Facilities (2)

Government to maintain equipment

RegulatorsStandards (1)

Qualifications are not mandated for staff

SchoolsKnowledge (1)

School was not aware of pre-existing injury

Parents

Communication (2) of pre-existing injury

Decision (2) to send participant to camp

with pre-existing injury

ManagementTraining (8)

Unqualified; Inadequate training (e.g. for handovers or unexpected situations); Maintain qualification currency

Staffing (5) Staff shortages;

Use of external staff

ProgramLocation (3)

Not prepared for activity; New location

Suitability (3) Suitability for participant

GroupTeamwork (8)

Communication; working together to brace/pull

rope; attention

Composition (2)Diverse

participant capabilities

Group Size (2)Leader to

participation ratio

Supervisor

Communication (7)of instructions

throughout activity

Participant

Experience (63) with activity or

equipment

Decisions (44)Decisions associated with misjudgment or excitement; Refusal to continue activity;

Decision to act without instruction

ResourcesEquipment & Clothing (50)

Rough wire, equipment type, stiff harness webbing. new safety device, fastening

hardness in correct spot

LeaderCommunication (29)

Instructions for conducting the activity safely, communication

between staff

Knowledge (23)Awareness of risks associated with the activity; Lack of skills;

Knowledge of procedures

Most frequently identified contributory factors associated with harness (outdoors) activitiesThe values in brackets represent the number of times the contributory factor was identified. The values on the lines indicate the number of times the relationship was identified.

Data are reported from National Incident Dataset with UPLOADS reporting restrictions applied.

1

1

1

1

1

3 Environment

Terrain (44)Steep; hight; rock wall; soft/hard landing strip; uneven

2

7

1513

2

1

43

1

1

1

1

1 11

11

6 2

223 near miss & injury incidents reportedActivity incident rate: 0.8 incidents reported / 1000 activity participation days

Example activities: Abseiling, rock/wall climbing, high ropes, ziplining

Incident types: 61 Near miss incidents, 162 Injuries (including, superficial, dislocation/strain, bite/sting, burn, fracture, head trauma, crushing, wound-open)

1

1 1