Harbour and Coastal Assignment
-
Upload
eoghan-odriscoll-collins -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Harbour and Coastal Assignment
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
1/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 1of 19
Name: Eoghan ODriscoll
Collins
Student Number:
109326049
April 2013
Dr. Jimmy Murphy
CE 4013:
Harbour
and Coastal
Engineering
University College CorkColiste na hOllscoile Corcaigh
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
2/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 2of 19
Table of ContentsExperiment 1: Wave Celerity .................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3
1.2 Apparatus ................................................................................................................................ 3
1.3 Method ................................................................................................................................... 4
1.4 Formulae ................................................................................................................................. 4
1.5 Results and Calculations ......................................................................................................... 5
1.6 Discussion and Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 7
Experiment2: Observation of Different Wave Types, Wave Run-up and Interaction with Obstacles .... 8
2.1 Observation of Different Wave Types ..................................................................................... 8
2.1.1 Regular Waves ................................................................................................................ 8
2.1.2 Irregular Waves ............................................................................................................... 8
2.1.3 Bulls Eye Wave ................................................................................................................ 8
2.1.4 Freak Wave ..................................................................................................................... 8
2.1.5 Observation of Wave Period and Wavelength ............................................................... 9
2.2 Observation of Reaction with Obstructions ............................................................................ 9
2.2.1 Interaction with Rubble Mound Breakwater (Beach) ..................................................... 9
2.2.2 Interaction with Vertical Wall ....................................................................................... 102.2.3 Interaction with Partial Depth Fixed Wave Barrier ....................................................... 10
Experiment 3: Stability of a Floating Body ............................................................................................ 11
3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 11
3.2 Apparatus .............................................................................................................................. 11
3.3 Method ................................................................................................................................. 12
3.4 Formulae ............................................................................................................................... 13
3.4.1 Theoretical Metacentric Height .................................................................................... 13
3.4.2 Experimental Metacentric Height ................................................................................. 14
3.5 Results and Calculations ....................................................................................................... 14
3.6 Graph for Determination of Experimental Metacentric Height ........................................... 16
3.7 Discussion of Results and Conclusion ................................................................................... 17
Experiment 4: Sediment Transfer ......................................................................................................... 18
4.1 What is happening? .............................................................................................................. 18
4.2 How is it happening? ............................................................................................................. 18
4.3 Why are we studying it? ....................................................................................................... 19
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
3/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 3of 19
Experiment 1: Wave Celerity
1.1 Introduction
This experiment investigates linear water wave theory with respect to real waves. Linear
wave theory models wave behavious. It is only an approximate method of analysis but
results can be suprisingly accurate and consistent.
The experiments to compare real waves and linear wave theory were carried out in the UCC
Hydraulics and Maritime Research Centre (HMRC) in Pouladuff, Cork City in the specialised
18 x 25 x 1 metre wave tank in which the waves are generated by 40 centrally controlled
flap type wedge shaped aluminium paddles. The wave tank in this facility is capable
generating waves up to a significant wave height of 0.18 metres at a period of 2.5 seconds.
In this experiment, it was decided to investigate the agreement with theoretical values for
wave periods varying from 0.8 to 2 seconds. The wave height in this case was selected as
50mm. This was however varied in order to enable the easy observation of the waves.
1.2 Apparatus
The only apparatus required in this experiment were a stopwatch and the aforementioned
HMRC wave tank: a picture and a schematic of which is shown in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2.
Figure 1.1: HMRC Wave Tank
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
4/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 4of 19
Figure 1.2: Schematic of HMRC Wave Tank
1.3 Method
1. For a particular wave period, measure the time taken for ten waves to pass a point
and divide it by ten to determine the experimental wave period. Repeat this and
take the average figure.
2. Measure the time it takes for a wave to pass between the two marks on the side of
the tank (8 metres apart). Divide 8 by this value to determine the experimental
celerity of the wave.
3. Repeat steps 1 and two for wave periods of 0.8, 1, 1.1, 1.14, 1.33, 1.6 and 2 seconds.
4. Use the data collected to calculate C0, C Theory, 0, Theory and Measured. Plot these
values against Period, T.
1.4 Formulae
The waves are classified as either deep water waves or transitional waves. The relevant
formulae are as follows:
Parameter Deep Water Transitional Water
Wave Velocity (c)
(
)Wave Length ()
(
)Limits of Application
Table 1.1: Formulae of Linear Wave Theory
The shallow water equations are omitted as none of the waves were shallow water waves.
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
5/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 5of 19
1.5 Results and Calculations
The data collected and the calculated C0, C Theory, 0, Theoryand Measuredare shown in Table
1.2 below.
Period
(T)TMeasured C0 0 CTheory Theory CMeasured Measured Classification
0.8 0.8 1.25 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.27 0.99 Deep
1 1 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.54 1.60 Deep
1.14 1.144 1.78 2.03 1.77 2.02 1.75 2.01 Transitional
1.33 1.32 2.08 2.76 2.04 2.71 1.91 2.58 Transitional
1.6 1.62 2.50 4.00 2.33 3.73 2.24 3.63 Transitional
2 1.99 3.12 6.25 2.61 5.22 2.38 4.78 Transitional
Table 1.2: Results and Calculations
The variation of C0, C Theory and C Measuredwith Period (T) is shown in Figure 1.3 while thevariation of 0, Theoryand Measuredwith Period (T) is shown in Figure 1.4.
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
6/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 6of 19
Figure 1.3: Variation of Wave Celerity with Period (T).
Figure 1.4: Variation of Wavelength with Period (T).
Celerity,c/(m/s)
Period, T / (sec)
Plot of C0, CMeasured& CTheoryAgainst Period (T)
C Measured C Theory C0
Wavelen
gth,
/
(m)
Period, T / (sec)
Plot of 0, Measured& TheoryAgainst Period (T)
Measured Theory 0
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
7/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 7of 19
1.6 Discussion and Conclusion
Based on this experiment, it is possible to deduce that, for a given wave height, both the
wave celerity (c) and the wavelength () increase with increasing Period (T), as is illustrated
by Figures 1.3 and 1.4 respectively.
It is apparent that the TMeasuredis nearly always greater than the actual Period (T). This can
be attributed to human error, resulting in a delay in turning off the stopwatch after the
wave passes the mark.
It can be seen that the linear water wave theory agrees reasonably well with real waves.
The agreement is very good for low periods. However, as the period increases, the
wavelengths and wave celerities recorded (I love cock) from the real waves deviate fromthe values predicted by the linear water wave theory.
For each measurement of wavelength and wave celerity, the measured figure is lower than
that predicted by the linear wave theory. It is possible that this could be attributed to
experimental error. This is unlikely however as the any experimental error would have been
minimised by choosing a large number of waves (ten) over which to record the times. It is
more likely that the discrepancy occurs as a result of the fact that the linear water wave
theory is less accurate for periods over approximately 1.4 seconds.
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
8/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 8of 19
Experiment2: Observation of Different
Wave Types, Wave Run-up and
Interaction with Obstacles
2.1 Observation of Different Wave Types
2.1.1 Regular Waves
Both long and short crested regular waves were observed in the wave tank. Regular waves
are waves which travel from one end of the tank to the other without changing or meeting
other waves. These waves are ultimately absorbed by the artificial Enkamat absorption
beach at the other end of the wave tank and hence, are not reflected back along the tank.
2.1.2 Irregular Waves
Irregular waves were then observed in the wave tank. These types of wave simulate the
conditions likely to be found offshore. They are the types of wave which commonly occur in
the ocean. Waves come randomly from different directions, meet and break at different
locations and spread and diffract in different directions. The result is a choppy surface,
similar to that found when wind blows across an open stretch of water.
2.1.3 Bulls Eye Wave
Bulls Eye waves were then observed in the tank. These occur when a series of similar waves
travel towards each other at an angle and intersect at a central point. At this point, the
wave height increases. A bulls eye formation then occurs propagating from this point. This
type of wave is rarely occurs in reality.
2.1.4 Freak Wave
Finally, freak waves were created in the tank. These occur when a series of waves with
varying height and period are created. Firstly, waves with a low celerity are created. These
are then followed by waves with a higher celerity. The waves with the higher celerity move
faster than those with the low celerity and therefore catch the slow moving waves. At the
point when the fast moving waves catch the slow moving waves, a breaking wave with a
large amplitude known as a freak wave is formed.
-
8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment
9/19
CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006
Page 9of 19
2.1.5 Observation of Wave Period and Wavelength
Several different types of waves were observed in the 26 metre wave flume. Firstly, waves
with a height of 50 mm, a Period (T) of 0.7 seconds and a wavelength () of 0.76 metres
were observed. Following this, waves with a similar height a Period (T) of 1.75 seconds and
a wavelength () of 4.78 metres were observed. It was noticed that the second group of
waves (with the greater Period and Wavelength) seemed much smaller owing to the fact
that they were less steep and more spread out as a result of their longer wavelength.
2.2 Observation of Reaction with Obstructions
The elevation and plan view of the obstructions to which the waves were subjected in the
wave flume are shown below in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1: Layout of Obstructions in Wave Flume
2.2.1 Interaction with Rubble Mound Breakwater (Beach)
At one end of the wave flume, a sloped rubble mound breakwater had been constructed
from loose granular material. The interaction of the waves with this obstruction was
observed. As the waves approached the beach, they changed from deep water waves (d >
0.5 L) to transitional waves (0.05 L d 0.5 L) and ultimately to shallow water waves (d