Harbour and Coastal Assignment

download Harbour and Coastal Assignment

of 19

Transcript of Harbour and Coastal Assignment

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    1/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 1of 19

    Name: Eoghan ODriscoll

    Collins

    Student Number:

    109326049

    April 2013

    Dr. Jimmy Murphy

    CE 4013:

    Harbour

    and Coastal

    Engineering

    University College CorkColiste na hOllscoile Corcaigh

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    2/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 2of 19

    Table of ContentsExperiment 1: Wave Celerity .................................................................................................................. 3

    1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3

    1.2 Apparatus ................................................................................................................................ 3

    1.3 Method ................................................................................................................................... 4

    1.4 Formulae ................................................................................................................................. 4

    1.5 Results and Calculations ......................................................................................................... 5

    1.6 Discussion and Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 7

    Experiment2: Observation of Different Wave Types, Wave Run-up and Interaction with Obstacles .... 8

    2.1 Observation of Different Wave Types ..................................................................................... 8

    2.1.1 Regular Waves ................................................................................................................ 8

    2.1.2 Irregular Waves ............................................................................................................... 8

    2.1.3 Bulls Eye Wave ................................................................................................................ 8

    2.1.4 Freak Wave ..................................................................................................................... 8

    2.1.5 Observation of Wave Period and Wavelength ............................................................... 9

    2.2 Observation of Reaction with Obstructions ............................................................................ 9

    2.2.1 Interaction with Rubble Mound Breakwater (Beach) ..................................................... 9

    2.2.2 Interaction with Vertical Wall ....................................................................................... 102.2.3 Interaction with Partial Depth Fixed Wave Barrier ....................................................... 10

    Experiment 3: Stability of a Floating Body ............................................................................................ 11

    3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 11

    3.2 Apparatus .............................................................................................................................. 11

    3.3 Method ................................................................................................................................. 12

    3.4 Formulae ............................................................................................................................... 13

    3.4.1 Theoretical Metacentric Height .................................................................................... 13

    3.4.2 Experimental Metacentric Height ................................................................................. 14

    3.5 Results and Calculations ....................................................................................................... 14

    3.6 Graph for Determination of Experimental Metacentric Height ........................................... 16

    3.7 Discussion of Results and Conclusion ................................................................................... 17

    Experiment 4: Sediment Transfer ......................................................................................................... 18

    4.1 What is happening? .............................................................................................................. 18

    4.2 How is it happening? ............................................................................................................. 18

    4.3 Why are we studying it? ....................................................................................................... 19

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    3/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 3of 19

    Experiment 1: Wave Celerity

    1.1 Introduction

    This experiment investigates linear water wave theory with respect to real waves. Linear

    wave theory models wave behavious. It is only an approximate method of analysis but

    results can be suprisingly accurate and consistent.

    The experiments to compare real waves and linear wave theory were carried out in the UCC

    Hydraulics and Maritime Research Centre (HMRC) in Pouladuff, Cork City in the specialised

    18 x 25 x 1 metre wave tank in which the waves are generated by 40 centrally controlled

    flap type wedge shaped aluminium paddles. The wave tank in this facility is capable

    generating waves up to a significant wave height of 0.18 metres at a period of 2.5 seconds.

    In this experiment, it was decided to investigate the agreement with theoretical values for

    wave periods varying from 0.8 to 2 seconds. The wave height in this case was selected as

    50mm. This was however varied in order to enable the easy observation of the waves.

    1.2 Apparatus

    The only apparatus required in this experiment were a stopwatch and the aforementioned

    HMRC wave tank: a picture and a schematic of which is shown in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2.

    Figure 1.1: HMRC Wave Tank

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    4/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 4of 19

    Figure 1.2: Schematic of HMRC Wave Tank

    1.3 Method

    1. For a particular wave period, measure the time taken for ten waves to pass a point

    and divide it by ten to determine the experimental wave period. Repeat this and

    take the average figure.

    2. Measure the time it takes for a wave to pass between the two marks on the side of

    the tank (8 metres apart). Divide 8 by this value to determine the experimental

    celerity of the wave.

    3. Repeat steps 1 and two for wave periods of 0.8, 1, 1.1, 1.14, 1.33, 1.6 and 2 seconds.

    4. Use the data collected to calculate C0, C Theory, 0, Theory and Measured. Plot these

    values against Period, T.

    1.4 Formulae

    The waves are classified as either deep water waves or transitional waves. The relevant

    formulae are as follows:

    Parameter Deep Water Transitional Water

    Wave Velocity (c)

    (

    )Wave Length ()

    (

    )Limits of Application

    Table 1.1: Formulae of Linear Wave Theory

    The shallow water equations are omitted as none of the waves were shallow water waves.

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    5/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 5of 19

    1.5 Results and Calculations

    The data collected and the calculated C0, C Theory, 0, Theoryand Measuredare shown in Table

    1.2 below.

    Period

    (T)TMeasured C0 0 CTheory Theory CMeasured Measured Classification

    0.8 0.8 1.25 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.27 0.99 Deep

    1 1 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.54 1.60 Deep

    1.14 1.144 1.78 2.03 1.77 2.02 1.75 2.01 Transitional

    1.33 1.32 2.08 2.76 2.04 2.71 1.91 2.58 Transitional

    1.6 1.62 2.50 4.00 2.33 3.73 2.24 3.63 Transitional

    2 1.99 3.12 6.25 2.61 5.22 2.38 4.78 Transitional

    Table 1.2: Results and Calculations

    The variation of C0, C Theory and C Measuredwith Period (T) is shown in Figure 1.3 while thevariation of 0, Theoryand Measuredwith Period (T) is shown in Figure 1.4.

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    6/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 6of 19

    Figure 1.3: Variation of Wave Celerity with Period (T).

    Figure 1.4: Variation of Wavelength with Period (T).

    Celerity,c/(m/s)

    Period, T / (sec)

    Plot of C0, CMeasured& CTheoryAgainst Period (T)

    C Measured C Theory C0

    Wavelen

    gth,

    /

    (m)

    Period, T / (sec)

    Plot of 0, Measured& TheoryAgainst Period (T)

    Measured Theory 0

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    7/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 7of 19

    1.6 Discussion and Conclusion

    Based on this experiment, it is possible to deduce that, for a given wave height, both the

    wave celerity (c) and the wavelength () increase with increasing Period (T), as is illustrated

    by Figures 1.3 and 1.4 respectively.

    It is apparent that the TMeasuredis nearly always greater than the actual Period (T). This can

    be attributed to human error, resulting in a delay in turning off the stopwatch after the

    wave passes the mark.

    It can be seen that the linear water wave theory agrees reasonably well with real waves.

    The agreement is very good for low periods. However, as the period increases, the

    wavelengths and wave celerities recorded (I love cock) from the real waves deviate fromthe values predicted by the linear water wave theory.

    For each measurement of wavelength and wave celerity, the measured figure is lower than

    that predicted by the linear wave theory. It is possible that this could be attributed to

    experimental error. This is unlikely however as the any experimental error would have been

    minimised by choosing a large number of waves (ten) over which to record the times. It is

    more likely that the discrepancy occurs as a result of the fact that the linear water wave

    theory is less accurate for periods over approximately 1.4 seconds.

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    8/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 8of 19

    Experiment2: Observation of Different

    Wave Types, Wave Run-up and

    Interaction with Obstacles

    2.1 Observation of Different Wave Types

    2.1.1 Regular Waves

    Both long and short crested regular waves were observed in the wave tank. Regular waves

    are waves which travel from one end of the tank to the other without changing or meeting

    other waves. These waves are ultimately absorbed by the artificial Enkamat absorption

    beach at the other end of the wave tank and hence, are not reflected back along the tank.

    2.1.2 Irregular Waves

    Irregular waves were then observed in the wave tank. These types of wave simulate the

    conditions likely to be found offshore. They are the types of wave which commonly occur in

    the ocean. Waves come randomly from different directions, meet and break at different

    locations and spread and diffract in different directions. The result is a choppy surface,

    similar to that found when wind blows across an open stretch of water.

    2.1.3 Bulls Eye Wave

    Bulls Eye waves were then observed in the tank. These occur when a series of similar waves

    travel towards each other at an angle and intersect at a central point. At this point, the

    wave height increases. A bulls eye formation then occurs propagating from this point. This

    type of wave is rarely occurs in reality.

    2.1.4 Freak Wave

    Finally, freak waves were created in the tank. These occur when a series of waves with

    varying height and period are created. Firstly, waves with a low celerity are created. These

    are then followed by waves with a higher celerity. The waves with the higher celerity move

    faster than those with the low celerity and therefore catch the slow moving waves. At the

    point when the fast moving waves catch the slow moving waves, a breaking wave with a

    large amplitude known as a freak wave is formed.

  • 8/12/2019 Harbour and Coastal Assignment

    9/19

    CE 4013: Harbour and Coastal Engineering Denis OSullivan, 108348006

    Page 9of 19

    2.1.5 Observation of Wave Period and Wavelength

    Several different types of waves were observed in the 26 metre wave flume. Firstly, waves

    with a height of 50 mm, a Period (T) of 0.7 seconds and a wavelength () of 0.76 metres

    were observed. Following this, waves with a similar height a Period (T) of 1.75 seconds and

    a wavelength () of 4.78 metres were observed. It was noticed that the second group of

    waves (with the greater Period and Wavelength) seemed much smaller owing to the fact

    that they were less steep and more spread out as a result of their longer wavelength.

    2.2 Observation of Reaction with Obstructions

    The elevation and plan view of the obstructions to which the waves were subjected in the

    wave flume are shown below in Figure 2.1.

    Figure 2.1: Layout of Obstructions in Wave Flume

    2.2.1 Interaction with Rubble Mound Breakwater (Beach)

    At one end of the wave flume, a sloped rubble mound breakwater had been constructed

    from loose granular material. The interaction of the waves with this obstruction was

    observed. As the waves approached the beach, they changed from deep water waves (d >

    0.5 L) to transitional waves (0.05 L d 0.5 L) and ultimately to shallow water waves (d