Happiness for Intl 106

54

Transcript of Happiness for Intl 106

Page 1: Happiness for Intl 106
Page 2: Happiness for Intl 106

UTILS AND SUCH

Bentham thought that pain and pleasure were the only intrinsic values in the world.

"nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.“

Effect on overall welfare is algebraically additive.

“The good is whatever brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people.”

Utilitarianism or the “Greatest Happiness Principle”

Page 3: Happiness for Intl 106

CONTINUED PRESENCE IN UCL

Page 4: Happiness for Intl 106

MILL AND MARSHALL

Page 5: Happiness for Intl 106

5

MAXING OUR UTILS

Page 6: Happiness for Intl 106

EDGEWORTH

Page 7: Happiness for Intl 106

EDGEWORTH BOX

Page 8: Happiness for Intl 106

EDGEWORTH’S OTHER BOX – THE HEDONIMETER A machine to measure utility, Edgeworth believed such a measurement

device to be necessary for the application of the science of economics (positive economics) to the real world.

“hedonism may still be in the state of heat or electricity before they became exact sciences”

Page 9: Happiness for Intl 106

WILHELM REICH – DISCOVERER OF THE ORGONE FIELD

Page 10: Happiness for Intl 106

AN ORGONE BOX BY WILHELM REICH

Page 11: Happiness for Intl 106

IS THAT BERNIE MADOFF?

Page 12: Happiness for Intl 106

WHAT’S IN A PICTURE

Page 13: Happiness for Intl 106

THE MODERN ECONOMIST APPROACH As economics grew more rigorous and

quantitative, more parsimonious definitions of welfare took hold.

Utility was taken to depend only on income as mediated by individual choices or preferences within a rational individual’s monetary budget constraint.

“Objective Approach” of economists: Based on Revealed Preference – we get what we

want! Assumes we always know what we want - rational

preferences Assumes we always know how to get it (rational

decision making and full information) A “Good is a Good and NOT a Bad”

Page 14: Happiness for Intl 106

A PSYCHOLOGIST’S APPROACH Hedonic Psychology

the study of what makes experiences and life pleasant or unpleasant.

It is concerned with feelings of pleasure and pain, of interest and boredom, of joy and sorrow,

and of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. It is also concerned with the whole range of

circumstances, from the biological to the societal, that occasion suffering and enjoyment.“

Subjective Approach: Self-reporting –questionnaire, survey

Physiological measurement Is there a machine to do this?

Measuring impulses in the brain or Measuring seratonin in system

Page 15: Happiness for Intl 106

THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME?

Page 16: Happiness for Intl 106

DANIEL KAHNEMANN

Page 17: Happiness for Intl 106

WHAT IS WRONG WITH GDP MEASURES PPP versus current X-rates Non-Market Production

Agriculture The washing paradox

Public Production How to value public production

User value or Factor prices The Gray and Black Markets

Barter, non-reporting etc – 22% in Italy, 8% in US Sustainability

Mineral depletion –oil states Pollution and Deforestation Depreciation of Public Facilities

Page 18: Happiness for Intl 106

DEFERRED MAINTENANCE

Page 19: Happiness for Intl 106

LA VIE DOUCE Increasing concerns about the adequacy of current

measures of economic performance, in particular those based on GDP figures.

Broader issues about the relevance of these figures as measures of societal well-being, as well as measures of economic, environmental, and social sustainability.

Together these identified the limits of GDP as an indicator of economic performance and social progress,

Articulated a need to consider additional information required for the production of a more relevant picture, to discuss how to present this information in the most appropriate way.

This is the charge of the Sarkozy Commission on led by Nobel laureates Stiglitz and Sen with others (Arrow) on the board.

Page 20: Happiness for Intl 106

SARKO KNOWS SOMETHING ABOUT HAPPINESS

Page 21: Happiness for Intl 106

SOCIAL TRANSFERS IN FRANCE

Page 22: Happiness for Intl 106

REAL INCOME USA AND FRANCE

Page 23: Happiness for Intl 106

IS LIFE BETTER THAN MONEY?

Page 24: Happiness for Intl 106

STIGLITZ/SEN REPORT

Individual current well-being has to do with economic factors, such as income, and with non-economic aspects of peoples’ lives what they do and what they can do, how they

feel, and the natural environment they live in. These levels of well-being can be sustained

over time if: stocks of capital that matter for our lives

(natural, physical, human, social) are passed onto future generations.

Ie the notion of “sustainability”

Page 25: Happiness for Intl 106

FROM MEASURING GDP TO ASSESSING WELLBEING

Unifying theme of the Stiglitz Sen report is: Now is the time for our measurement

system to shift emphasis from measuring economic production to measuring people’s well-being.

Changing emphasis does not mean dismissing GDP and production measures but supplementing them and

This probably means: Measurement or survey to establish well-

being

Page 26: Happiness for Intl 106

SURVEY APPROACH Happiness surveys are based on questions in

which the individual is asked, ‘Generally speaking, how happy are you with

your life’ or ‘How satisfied are you with your life’, with

possible answers on a four-to-seven point scale. Psychologists have a preference for “life

satisfaction” questions. Yet answers to happiness and life satisfaction

questions correlate quite closely. Lots of problems with surveys – mood

varies by time of day, ordering of questions, wording of questions all affect outcome.

Page 27: Happiness for Intl 106

MOOD AND HOUR

Page 28: Happiness for Intl 106

SUBJECTIVE WELL BEING

Page 29: Happiness for Intl 106

THE EASTERLIN PARADOX Most happiness studies find that within countries

wealthier/richer people are, on average, happier than poor ones,

However, studies over time find very little, if any, relationship between increases in per capita income and average happiness levels.

Wealthier countries (as a group) are happier than poor ones (as a group) – but there are obvious exceptions

Even among the less happy, poorer countries, there is not a clear relationship between average income and average happiness levels, suggesting that many other factors – including cultural traits – are at play.

“Relative income effect” Treadmill phenomenon

Page 30: Happiness for Intl 106

PART OF THE PARADOX

Page 31: Happiness for Intl 106

GDP/HEAD AND HAPPINESS 1

Page 32: Happiness for Intl 106

GDP/HEAD AND HAPPINESS 2

Page 33: Happiness for Intl 106

FACEBOOK’S METRIC

Page 34: Happiness for Intl 106

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE INDEX

Page 35: Happiness for Intl 106

BHUTAN – THE PIONEER IN GROSS NATIONAL HAPPINESS

1.   Psychological Well-being 2.   Time Use 3.   Community Vitality 4.   Culture 5.   Health 6.   Education 7.   Environmental Diversity 8.   Living Standard 9.   Governance

Page 36: Happiness for Intl 106

HAPPINESS IN DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES

Page 37: Happiness for Intl 106

HAPPINESS, PARTNERSHIP AND SEX

Oswald and Blanchflower found that to “compensate” for the loss in happiness of a major life event such as being widowed or a marital separation, it would be necessary to provide the average individual with $100,000 in extra income a year, or more than double their incomes.

On average, the amount of happiness bought by going from sex less than once a month to at least once a month is roughly equivalent to about $40,000 of annual income.

Sex brings a lot of happiness, but diminishing returns from sex does set in after that.

Page 38: Happiness for Intl 106

ENVY AND HAPPINESS

Harvard University’s Erzo Luttmer has shown that an increase of 10 percent, say, in neighbors’ earnings, or a 10percent decrease in one’s own income, have roughly the same negative effect on wellbeing.

Blanchflower found that “my happiness rises if I get a new BMW but doesn’t if my neighbors also get one. Here, neighborhoodshould be thought of broadly as any relevant comparator group,including colleagues and friends.

Page 39: Happiness for Intl 106

ENVY – OR NOT

Page 40: Happiness for Intl 106

HAPPINESS AND INCOME: 1975 AND 1998

Page 41: Happiness for Intl 106

CLASS AND HAPPINESS

Page 42: Happiness for Intl 106

WHERE ARE WE?

Page 43: Happiness for Intl 106

VENEZUELA

After 10 years as president, Hugo Chávez has polarized Venezuela, but inspired its poor.

Page 44: Happiness for Intl 106

WHO’S LAST?

Page 45: Happiness for Intl 106

WHY DENMARK Homogenous population

Solidarity, common purpose Fairly High Income

Globally #37 in GDP PPP/Head Even Distribution of Income

Relative Income is Important Good health care – universal, free Good education system – universal free High on Perceptions of Corruption Index

(#2) Fairly High on Sustainability (#32)

Page 46: Happiness for Intl 106

WHY NOT US? Falling Female Happiness

Too many challenges Declining Marriage Rate Worries About Big Things

Health payments Maybe health outcomes Life expectancies lower in US but not dramatically Worst Performance is in Infant and Maternal Mortality

Hangover after “Greatest Generations” Not good enough, no challenge Going Postal

Incompletely Offset by Higher Black Scores

Page 47: Happiness for Intl 106

TRENDS IN HAPPINESS BETWEEN GROUPS

Page 48: Happiness for Intl 106

TRENDS IN HAPPINESS BETWEEN GROUPS 2

Page 49: Happiness for Intl 106

DOES MORAL DECAY FACTOR IN

Page 50: Happiness for Intl 106

FEMALE HAPPINESS IN THE UNITED STATES

Page 51: Happiness for Intl 106

INCREASING MISTRUST

Page 52: Happiness for Intl 106

THE ROLE OF GENETICS

Page 53: Happiness for Intl 106

CHANGE IN REAL FAMILY INCOME

Page 54: Happiness for Intl 106

SHARE OF RICHEST 1%