Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

download Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

of 4

Transcript of Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

  • 7/29/2019 Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

    1/4

    Summary

    Behzad Behdani

    Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model

    The management of supply chains has been transformed by new business trends in the last two

    decades. Globalization, outsourcing and Just-in-time delivery are examples of these trends. On the

    one side, these trends in the supply chain management have brought substantial benefit in cost

    reductions and improved competiveness. On the other side, supply chains have become more

    vulnerable to potential disruptions. Companies are not just facing more risk factors in a long

    globalized supply network, but the consequences of potential disruptions are also increasingly

    severe, as the impact of an initiating event propagates faster through the network due to lower buffer

    stocks and fragmentation of control in the value chain.

    To cope with this increased vulnerability, companies need to actively manage (the risk of) disruptive

    events in their supply chains. This calls for systematic frameworks to guide their efforts. Without

    such frameworks, people have to rely only on their personal experience to manage disruptions.

    Besides, due to the complexity of todays global supply chains, decision making tools are needed to

    provide support in different stages of the supply chain disruption management process. This study is

    conducted to address these issues.

    - An integrated framework for managing disruptions in supply chains

    In the supply chain management literature, handling supply chain disruptions is discussed from twodifferent perspectives. One is the pre-disruption or preventive perspective which focuses on pro-

    active measures to avoid possible disruptions or to minimize the exposure to their potential impact.

    The other perspective is the post-disruption or re-active perspective which defines what must be done

    after a disruption has materialized in the real world. To systematically manage supply chain

    disruptions, both perspectives are important and must be considered together in a comprehensive

    process. Nevertheless, the literature illustrates few contributions actually emphasizing the need for

    such a comprehensive integrated framework including both the pre- and post-disruption perspective.

    Whereas these present compelling evidence of their benefit for specific cases, a generic framework

    that incorporates both views and details the pre- and post-disruption steps and their inter-relations

    was found to be lacking in the literature. It is this gap that the work presented in this thesis has

    sought to fill.

    The framework developed in this dissertation called InForMDRiSC (Integrated Framework for

    Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains) describes the steps in handling disruptions in two

    interconnected cycles (see Figure 1): the Risk Management Cycle which is about pre-disruption steps

    and the Disruption Management Cycle which describes post-disruption steps in handling supply

    chain disruptions. InForMDRiSC has been developed based on the available frameworks in the

    literature and evaluated by domain experts in industry and academia. To make the framework

  • 7/29/2019 Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

    2/4

    operational, each step including supporting tools have been described in detail based on the existing

    literature on supply chain risk/disruption management. In the analysis of literature, the majority of

    contributions were found to focus on the pre-disruption steps, with different levels of attention for

    different steps of the risk management cycle. Some steps, such as risk identification and risk

    treatment, have been explored extensively while risk monitoring and risk quantification have been

    given far less attention. This implies that, in making the integrated framework operational, some

    steps could be detailed on the basis of literature available, whereas other steps need to be filled in,

    building on practices and tools developed in related fields. Moreover, whereas some modeling and

    simulation tools are presented to support decision making in the risk management cycle (pre-

    disruption), the application of modeling and simulation for post-disruption management process has

    not been addressed adequately in the existing literature. Besides, tools to support all steps in the

    whole integrated process are lacking. To close this gap, a modeling and simulation framework was

    developed and its application to supports relevant steps of InForMDRiSC was discussed in the rest of

    this thesis.

    Figure 1. The structure of the Integrated Framework for Managing Disruption Risks in

    Supply Chains (InForMDRiSC)- An agent-based modeling framework for managing disruptions in supply chains

    Making decisions in different steps of InForMDRiSC needs flexible simulation frameworks enabling

    decision makers to explore a range of what-if scenarios and experiment with different disruption

    management strategies. To develop a simulation framework, we started by choosing an appropriate

    simulation paradigm. To this aim, a supply chain was characterized as a complex socio-technical

    system. Following, Agent-based Modeling (ABM) has been chosen as the preferred simulation

    approach which is best equipped to capture both the technical and social complexity (and theirinterrelations) of global supply chains. In addition, it provides the greatest flexibility in

  • 7/29/2019 Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

    3/4

    experimenting with different settings in a disruption management problem. To develop an agent-

    based modeling framework for supply chain disruption management, next, a conceptual model has

    been developed in three steps (Figure 2). Firstly, an agent-based representation of a supply chain was

    introduced. The basis for this representation was looking at a supply chain as a socio-technical

    system. Thus, the Agent (representing the decision making units in the system) was considered as the

    central concept in the social sub-system, responsible for the control and operation of a set of

    Technologies (representing the physical components in the system). The existing supply chain

    management theories were also utilized to specify the main factors describing the structure and

    operation of each supply chain. In the second step, a conceptual model of supply chain disruption

    was formalized. Finally, we described how different disruption management practices can be defined

    and implemented in the model. With these three steps a conceptual modeling framework for

    disruption management in supply chains has been presented. The concepts in the conceptual

    framework were encoded in Java programming language. A set of generic objects has been

    developed which can be customized for specific cases by sub-classing and composing instances.

    The application of this modeling framework is demonstrated and discussed in this thesis for the

    specific case of a lube oil supply chain. Next, we showed how the simulation model developed can

    be used to support decision making in different steps of InForMDRiSC.

    Figure 2. The steps in developing the supply chain disruption modeling framework- Concluding remarks

    The overall purpose of this thesis has been to provide support for handling supply chain disruptions.

    To this aim, an integrated process and a simulation framework have been presented and discussed.

    These two contributions are, in fact, complementary means for supply chain disruption management

    forming a simulation-based integrated framework for handling disruptions in supply chains. Each

    of these two can also be used separately and independently. On the one hand, even if we do not use

    the simulation framework, InForMDRiSC can be considered as a process for disruption management.

    On the other hand, the modeling framework can also be utilized independently to design simulation

    models and experiment with different factors which influence normal supply chain operation and can

    be manipulated to prevent or recover from supply chain disruptions. To further facilitate the

  • 7/29/2019 Handling Disruptions in Supply Chains: An Integrated Framework and an Agent-based Model (Summary )

    4/4

    application of InForMDRiSC and modeling framework in industrial cases, directions for future

    research including organizational studies on integrating the pre- and post-disruption management

    processes have been also discussed in this thesis.