Handbook for Trainers (EN)
description
Transcript of Handbook for Trainers (EN)
PaTiE: Psychodrama as a
Tool in Education
Handbook for workshop directors
Leonardo Da Vinci project – Transfer of Innovation
Project No: 2013-1-GR1-LEO05-14123
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
INDEX PaTiE: Psychodrama as a Tool in Education ................................................................ 1
Handbook for workshop directors .............................................................................. 1
Leonardo Da Vinci project – Transfer of Innovation ............................................... 1
Foreword ............................................................................................................ 4
1. Psychodrama in educational process .......................................................... 6
2. Introduction on PaTiE training materials ...................................................... 9
2.1 Recommendations and key points ....................................................... 9
2.1. 2.2 Requirements, materials and tools ............................................... 10
2.3 Specifications for each workshop ........................................................... 11
2.2. Module 1: The experiential method of psychodrama .......................... 11
2.3. Module 2: Warm up ............................................................................ 13
2.4. Module 3: The power of the group ...................................................... 15
2.5. Module 4: Sociometric group mapping ............................................... 17
2.6. Module 5: Conflict management ......................................................... 19
2.7. Module 6: Working with symbols ........................................................ 22
2.8. Module 7: Role playing ....................................................................... 26
2.9. Module 8: Sharing with the group ....................................................... 28
3. Evaluation ................................................................................................. 32
3.1. Evaluation Form for Workshop Director in Psychodramatic exercises 32
3.2. Evaluation Reports Template for Workshop Director .......................... 34
3.3. Evaluation Forms for Course Participants (1 form per Module) .......... 36
Module 1: “The Experiential Method of Psychodrama” ............................................ 36
Module 2: “Warm Up” .............................................................................................. 38
Module 3: “The Power of the Group” ....................................................................... 40
Module 4: “Sociometric Group Mapping” ................................................................. 42
Module 5: “Conflict Management” ............................................................................ 44
Module 6: “Working with Symbols” .......................................................................... 46
Module 7: “Role Playing” ......................................................................................... 48
Module 8: “Sharing with the Group” ......................................................................... 50
3.4. Evaluation of the results ..................................................................... 52
BIBLIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................. 54
2
3
Foreword
The Handbook for trainers on Psychodramatic Experiential Teaching Methods has
been developed in the framework of the project "PaTiE - Psychodrama as Tool in
Education", funded by the IKY National Agency of Greece within the context of the
Leonardo Da Vinci, action Transfer of Innovation, EU Programming 2007-2013. The
project, which was approved in 2013 for an overall duration of 24 months, terminating
on 30 September 2015, involves 4 EU countries and 6 partners: Region of
Crete/Lifelong Learning Department/Vocational Training Centre Regional Unit of
Rethymno, ECTE, European Centre in Training for Employment Rethymno (EL), EST
Lifelong Learning Centre, Bielskie Stowarzyszenie Artystyczne Teatr Grodzki (PL),
Centro Machiavelli Firenze (IT), and ALECOP, S.COOP. (ES).
The overarching goal of the PaTiE programme is to introduce VET adult educators to
the experiential method of psychodrama and train them on how to effectively apply
selected psychodramatic principles and techniques in their educational processes.
Moreover, PaTiE project aims to transfer to partners the experiential learning
methods of Psychodrama developed by Polish partners and applied in their
educational seminars. The Polish partner “Grodzki Theatre Association” was leader
of POTENS project (project no.: 142673-LLP-1-2008-1-PL-Grundtvig-GMP) and
“EST LLL Centre” was partner in the consortium. Through the implementation of
POTENS project Polish partners developed a “Guideline on psychodrama use in
AE” and a book entitled “The search for creativity”. These educational materials
and “know-how” were transferred to PaTiE project, and were adapted to the needs
of participating countries and VET sector.
The elaboration of the guidelines is rooted in the cooperation of an international team
of experts. The draft version of the guidelines was tested in national pilot workshops
organized to evaluate the formerly developed PaTiE curriculum and training materials.
That was achieved by delivering four pilot courses for adult educators on
psychodramatic learning techniques in each of the project participating countries in the
national languages (Greece, Italy, Poland and Spain). The four national pilot courses
were led by experienced psychodramatists. These pilot courses were running in 2015,
completing 64 hours in each country and having totally 48 adult VET educators as
4
participants experiencing and experimenting psychodramatic techniques and
approaches.
This handbook is divided in three chapters; the chapter entitled Psychodrama in educational process contains the main guiding ideas related to the psychodrama use
in adult education. Most of the parts of this chapter were transferred by the Guidelines on psychodrama use in adult education developed in the frames of implementation
of the EU project POTENS. The chapter with title Introduction on PaTiE training materials aims to provide guidelines on how to use the exercise book and theory, and
where to find the material to be taught. PaTiE workshop directors will also find
guidelines for structuring each workshop with regard to time and content, and
identifying the objectives of each activity. Finally, the chapter entitled Evaluation is
dealing with course evaluation. In this chapter workshop directors could find guidelines
on the criteria based on they should evaluate the completed workshop activities. Also,
in this chapter workshop directors could find the corresponding recommended
evaluation sheets and questionnaires, designed to facilitate the evaluation of the
techniques and methods that each module of the PaTiE curriculum presents.
5
1. Psychodrama in educational process
The starting points of the educational psychodrama are the personal and the
professional boundaries of the two relational partners: those of the learner and the
educator. The education aims for transformation of knowledge, of attitudes and of
skills. Psychodrama offers an adequate approach and useful tools especially for
changing attitudes and developing skills in different domains of education, but also for
the application of the theoretical knowledge. The domain of attitude change includes
the learners' emotions, values, beliefs, biases, role expectations that influence the
learning atmosphere and the learners' relationship to the educator and education, to
the learning process and the learning environment. This is the main domain in which
the psychodrama can set the stage for creative contributions, addressing both the
learners' and the educators' emotions and beliefs, offering possibilities to clarify roles,
expectations, values, beliefs and biases. The skills are the abilities to put specific
acquired knowledge into practice. The knowledge domain refers both to the pure
theoretical knowledge and to its application. Psychodrama means action, that is doing
in practice what the person knows or even doesn't knows, or simply experiencing in
practice what the person is able to do and what kind of effects some actions might
have. Addressing the domain of the attitudes and the interpersonal skills, psychodrama
can offer first of all, an excellent approach and beneficial means for undergraduate and
graduate educators’ training, lifelong learning activities, meaning also supervision for
educational work and staff.
One of the problems raised by Blatner (2002) regarding the most wide-spread
technique related to the Morenian tradition, role playing, “comes from the common
tendency to assume that interpersonal skills are easier than technical skills – though in
fact they are even more difficult – and so people tend to think they can engage in
directing role playing before they've really achieved a level of bare competence (much
less mastery). (...) Sometimes teachers fail to appreciate the complexity of a skill
they're learning, and it's important to emphasize that directing role playing is about as
complex as learning how to deliver a baby”. The ability to educate and teach is first of
all an interpersonal skill, and this is where psychodrama can largely contribute, since it
is essentially a way to develop interpersonal skills, to deepen the professional self-
knowledge and to better understand the learners' needs.
6
Changing attitudes and developing skills requires an accommodative type of learning.
We agree with Adam Blatner's point of view regarding the common needs of all
learners involved in education, related to what the well-known psychologist and
epistemologist Piaget called assimilation and accommodation in the learning process.
“Unfortunately, so much of education is oriented to the kinds of learning that can be
more easily tested, which is assimilative, memorization type learning. Yet what the
world really needs is people who have skills, and skills go beyond mere knowledge of
facts. Skills, though, require a more complex performance-oriented testing which
requires more teacher attention, covers more subtle variables. And skills reflect an
accommodative type of learning. (…) These skills cannot be learned by reading any
number of books, although a little didactic material can be helpful in creating an
intellectual framework for the accommodative learning. Rather, the kinds of skills
needed for flexible, creative, rational thinking must be exercised, practised, and learned
in a process of interaction, risk-taking, self-expression, feedback, encouragement, and,
in short, a process which is closer to learning to swim than learning the capital cities of
the various states” (Blatner, 2002). Psychodrama offers valuable approaches to re-
establish the equilibrium of assimilative and accommodative learning modes with its
large possibilities to foster accommodative learning through its active methods
developing spontaneity and creativity.
The learning atmosphere created by psychodrama is another basic resource of
psychodrama in favour of education. Being a group method, psychodrama can produce
a proper learning environment through creating group cohesion, atmosphere of
confidence and safety, in which the learner can effectively handle her/his anxieties
related to the learning situation, teacher/educator or group members. Much of the
problems reported by the adult educators they are confronting with in their work (e.g.
drop outs, lack of motivation) can be handled more efficiently if more attention is paid to
the development of group cohesion and creation of an adequate learning environment.
Usually too short time is devoted to creation of group cohesion and security issues.
Many times classes are not treated like a group going through different phases from
birth to coming to an end, but rather like a mass without taking into account basic group
dynamic phenomena. The capacity to handle group dynamic phenomena requires a
wider and deeper training, especially for such major themes of group dynamics like
conflict resolution and handling of resistances.
7
Psychodrama techniques used in education are laying on the foundation of the manner
psychodrama leader/adult educator understands the application of psychodramatic
tools. This depends on:
the way psychodrama directors/adult educators perceive their professional role
boundaries, attributions and responsibilities (professional self-knowledge)
the professional relationships (the encounter, than the contracts) between
different role partners involved in the educational process
how the participants'/learners' roles, needs, motivations and other
characteristics really are and how the adult educators understand them
the objectives of the psychodramatic intervention in the specific educational
(and organizational) setting, according to the specific educational contract, etc.
All psychodrama techniques are suitable to contribute to the goals set in PaTiE project,
but the success of psychodrama use in education depends on the grounding of the
educator’s competencies by a comprehensive psychodrama training. The pilot
workshop directors, trained as psychodrama experts, exploited a very large array of
psychodrama applications. The VET adult educators, participants of PaTiE pilot
courses, who were mostly at their first steps in psychodrama, as expected, explored
mainly the use of warm up and sociometric exercises, some collective games and sub-
group role-playing activities, as well as several self expression modalities, like body
movement and the use of symbolic objects. Warm-up exercises or ice-breaker activities
were used by the VET adult educators in order to motivate their learners/participants,
to allow them to know each other and to develop the learning environment.
8
2. Introduction on PaTiE training materials
This chapter provides guidelines to VET adult educators participating in PaTiE course and explains how to use the exercise book and theory and where to find the material to
be taught. PaTiE workshop directors will also find guidelines for structuring each
workshop with regard to time and content, and identifying the objectives of each
activity. In the section dealing with evaluation, the criteria with which the workshop
director should evaluate the completed workshop activities are identified, as are the
corresponding recommended evaluation sheets and questionnaires.
2.1 Recommendations and key points
Participants: the participants in
these workshops are VET
educators who work in continuing
vocational education and training. It
is recommended that there be
between 10 and 16 members in the
group.
Content level: Given that the
modules are independent,
however, it is possible that the
participants have not attended the
other sessions. In such case, they
can ask to the instructor to
consider whether a more thorough
examination of the basic concepts
is required. VET adult educators
may consult the introductory
Module 1, or any of the other
course modules, in order to
understand some key concepts.
Purpose: the purpose of this
course is to present certain
techniques that could be for
carrying out Psychodramatic work
among diverse activities in the
classroom. When the workshop
director is thinking about imparting
any module, he/she should first
review the main aims and practices
offered by each of them. This
information can be found in the
introduction of the subjects and it is
useful in order to decide which kind
of module will be the best for the
group’s interests.
Objective: the objective is both to
teach the relevance of the symbol
in Psychodramatic work within the
classroom and to introduce
exercises to teachers of adult
vocational training and life-long
education that will allow them to
improve certain multidisciplinary
competences, identified as being
9
essential by members of the adult
education sector itself. Some of
these competences may be such
as improving communication with
the course participants, contending
with diverse groups, creating an
atmosphere of greater trust,
motivating course participants,
encouraging understanding
between classmates, or fostering
creativity and spontaneity.
Duration: each module, 8 in total,
is intended for a workshop of
around 8-10 hours duration (during
the pilots it has been seen that 64
hours may not be enough to gain
enough confidence in the director
role, therefore it is recommended
that the duration is increased to 80
hours). The actual time required
will depend on the needs of the
group. It is recommended each
module to be held on a single day
or, if this is not possible, on two
consecutive days.
Structure: the workshop will follow
the normal psychodramatic
structure. Warming up, action and
sharing. The psychodramatic
structure is always dependent on
the classroom and group needs or
demands. Exercises: The Psychodramatic
exercises that are set out in each
module have the objective to
introduce educators to the specific
processes in Psychodrama, so
they may understand how to apply
them in the classroom. In the case
of the symbolic work in
Psychodrama, the objective of the
exercises contained in the manual
is to provide the VET adult
educator with tools for dealing with
the different situations that can
arise in the classroom.
2.1. 2.2 Requirements, materials and tools
Workshop director: the workshop
director should be an professional
psychodramatist. These techniques
are very powerful and must be
given by an expert. The rule of
“expect more than you bargained
for” is important in Psychodrama,
and it requires a trainer
experienced in handling these
techniques.
Space: a large room is needed for
running these workshops, one with
enough space for the participants
to move around and act as they
carry out the recommended
exercises.
Theory: in order to integrate the
theoretical concepts into the
Psychodramatic action, it is
recommended that the workshop
10
director outlines the key concepts
to be introduced in the main
exercise of the workshop,
according to the needs of the
participants and as will be specified
later.
Tools and materials: the tools for
planning and evaluating the
exercises during the workshops,
and the materials required to carry
out the dramatic action, are both
defined in each module, so you will
need the training materials
developed for this course to set up
and impart the PaTiE workshops.
2.3 Specifications for each workshop
Below are exposed the main theories per each modules, with the specific concepts that
should be exposed in each workshop, as well as some tips and techniques that can be
imparted. However, note that, depending on the experience of the workshop director,
he or she can change the exercises and readapt the theories.
2.2. Module 1: The experiential method of psychodrama
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Presentation of the
module content and its
aims followed by
introduction to the
theories: 1-2 hours
Practical
demonstrations of the
theories and specific
approaches/technique
s through exercises
and discussion with
learners: 5-6 hours
Evaluation: 1 hour
(possibly followed by
e-mail survey)
Pages 3-19
Materials
Colorful scarves
Sheets of paper
(smaller and larger)
Pages 20-32
11
Pieces of cardboard,
glue, scissors, string
for making masks
Illustrated magazines
or newspapers
Markers, pencils,
crayons – different
colours
Flipchart or whiteboard
Projector (optional)
Learning outcomes
On completion of the
module, the learners will
be able to:
outline the main
concepts and
principles of
psychodrama
give examples of
application of the
method in education
identify possible
threats resulting from
the use of
psychodrama outside
of psychotherapeutic
context
point out opportunities
of enriching VET adult
education with
psychodramatic
techniques and
exercises
Page 3
Theories presentation
J.L. Moreno and the
origins of
Pages 5-19
12
psychodrama
Creativity and
spontaneity – the
cornerstones of
psychodrama
The primacy of the
encounter
On the psychodrama
stage
Repertoire of roles
Sharing experience
Exercises and activities Greetings
Names
Trust
Social atom
Complementary
Masks
Yes-No
Path
Pages 20-32
2.3. Module 2: Warm up
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Short presentation of
module, aims, method
and trainers. 15
minutes
Warm-up exercise 15-
30 minutes
Introduction for learners
(module presentation,
aims/ scope etc, theory
presentation): 1-2
Pages 4-7
13
hours
Activities/exercises/
discussion: 3 -5 hours
Evaluation: 1 hour
Materials
Colorful scarves
Paper and pens/pencils
for writing/drawing
Colored remnant
(scamp of cloth)
Masks
Hats
Colored paint (tempera)
Music and music player
Various magazines on
sport, hunting, society,
entertainment, nature,
etc
Scissors, glue, pens
and crayons
Page 26
Learning outcomes
Learners are expected to be
able to:
To explain the
principles of warming-
up and its possible
benefits for educational
practice in VET
To list warming-up
techniques and argue
why and how they can
(cannot) be applied in
the participants’ own
practice
To propose and run an
appropriate warming-up
exercise to respond to
a particular
Pages 22-24
14
problem/challenge in a
group of adult learners
To discuss with group
about the experience
Theories presentation
Definition of Warm Up
Concept of Tele
Tele and meeting
Concept of spontaneity
Concept of creativity
Game and Psycodrama
Pages 5-22
Exercises and activities Activities to facilitate
the presentations
Team building activities
Activities to do on the
move
Pages 24-34
2.4. Module 3: The power of the group
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Short presentation of
module, aims, method
and trainers: 30
minutes
Warm-up exercises
and discussion about
group dynamics: 1
hour
Theory presentation,
group theories
dynamics: 1-2 hours
Activities/exercises/
discussion: 5 -6 hours
Evaluation: 1 hour
Pages 3- 4
15
Materials
Colorful scarves
Mats/ Rugs
Various toys: animals,
dolls of different sex,
dolls of different kind-
like fairies, mermaids
Sheets of paper and
colorful markers,
pencils, oil pastels
Playmobil
Pages 26- 33
Learning outcomes
Explain the principles
of group and group
dynamic and their
possible benefits from
their implementation in
VET.
Identify the benefits of
psychodrama in
educational process,
as being a group
member.
List three exercises
that refer to group work
and how these can be
applied in class.
Propose and run a
certain exercise which
corresponds to a
particular challenge in
a group of adult
learners.
Page 3
Theories presentation
Historical detection of the
scientific study of Group
Defining Groups
Describing Groups
Group Dynamic
Pages 4- 20
16
Stages of Group
Groups & Group dynamic
in Psychodrama
The value of groups and
Group Dynamics in
Education
Exercises and activities Count until 20
Change of Position
Who will transfer me
across?
Group- body
Like a movie
Story making
Just a Word
Wander and Focus
Group Sculpture
My Route in the Group
Introduction to the
exercises. Pages: 21- 22
Considerations & Risks in
applying the exercises for
the Educator. Pages: 22-
25.
Exercises pages: 25-34
2.5. Module 4: Sociometric group mapping
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Presentation of the
module content and its
aims followed by
introduction to the
theories: 1-2 hours
Practical
demonstrations of the
theories and specific
approaches/technique
s through exercises
and discussion with
learners: 5-6 hours
Evaluation: 1 hour
(possibly followed by
Pages 3-19
17
e-mail survey)
Materials
Colorful scarves
Sheets of paper
(smaller and larger)
Markers, pencils,
crayons – different
colours
Flipchart or whiteboard
Projector (optional)
Pages 19-30
Learning outcomes
On completion of the
module, the participants
will be able to:
explain the principles
of sociometry and its
possible benefits for
educational practice in
VET
list three sociometric
techniques and argue
why and how they can
(cannot) be applied in
the participants’ own
practice
propose and run an
appropriate
sociometric exercise to
respond to a particular
problem/challenge in a
group of adult learners
“map” the structure of
a sample group and
the patters of its
inherent relations
Page 3
Theories presentation The foundations of Pages 5-19
18
sociometry in J.L.
Moreno’s writings
Social atom
Science of action
Sociometric methods
and techniques
Current issues
debated
Exercises and activities Dividing line
Social atom
What to choose
Synergies
Triangle of conflict
Map
Pages 19-30
2.6. Module 5: Conflict management
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Short presentation of
module, aims, method
and trainers: 30
minutes
Warm-up exercises
and discussion: 1 hour
Theory presentation,
Group Function, Origin
of Conflict, etc: 1-2
hours
Activities/exercises/
discussion: 5-6 hour
Evaluation: 1 hour
Pages 3- 4
Materials
Colorful scarves
Playmobil
Pages 24- 31
19
Various toys: animals,
dolls of different sex,
dolls of different kind-
like fairies, mermaids
Sheets of paper and
colorful markers,
pencils, oil pastels
Learning outcomes
Indicate the extra value
of the psychodramatic
intervention in conflict
management.
Identify the benefits of
‘’opening’’ and
confronting an existing,
obvious or underlying,
conflict in the group
and how this
influences the learning
procedure.
Point out the limitations
of such an exploration
in the classroom.
List three exercises
that refer to conflict
management and how
these can be applied in
class
Propose and run an
appropriate
psychodramatic
exercise which
corresponds to an
emerged conflict
situation in a
classroom of adult
learners.
Page 3
20
Theories presentation
What means Normal
function of the Group?
What means Non
Normal function of the
Group?
How a Confrontational
situation is expressed
in a Group?
How a Group Conflict
is Resolved?
What Leading
Weaknesses appear?
The Leader’s Attitude
in a Conflict situation
Social Elements in
Groups
Conflict Management
in Psychodrama
Conflict Management
in Education
Pages 5- 19
Exercises and activities Dogs and Cats
Conflict
Enemy
Follow and be followed
Teacher- Reactive
Child
The Shoe
Something that has not
been settled
Group Sculpture
Just a Word
Wander and Focus
My Route in the Group
Introduction to the
exercises. Pages: 20- 21
Considerations & Risks in
applying the exercises for
the Educator. Page: 22
Exercises pages: 23-31
21
2.7. Module 6: Working with symbols
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Pre-session
preparation for
learners (module
presentation: aims/
scope etc, theory
presentation: brief
introduction to the
theories): 1-2 hours
Session: exercises/
discussion with
learners: 5-6 hours
Evaluation: 1 hour
(this should be done
by director and
participants after the
workshop, and send
by email).
Structure pages 3-4
Materials
Theoretical outline of
the adult educator.
Various magazines on
sport, hunting, society,
entertainment, nature,
etc. are placed in the
centre of the room.
Scissors, glue and
poster boards for
making a collage.
White paper sheets,
pens and crayons.
A bag to hold the
sheets of paper.
The materials that the
For more information about
the module pages: 3-4
22
trainer will need to perform
the exercises are specified
in each exercise.
Learning outcomes
Explain the
importance of the use
of symbology in
education practice.
Suggest diverse
symbols and identify
their possible
function.
Choose exercises
that are appropriate
to the objectives set
out.
Understand the
importance of
protecting and
maintaining the
integrity of both the
group and the
individual.
Integrate the use of
symbols with active
Psychodramatic
techniques.
Appreciate the
importance of sharing
in Psychodrama.
Develop a simple
Psychodramatic
exercise, orientated
towards adult
education, in which
symbols for a real life
classroom situation
Aims and learning
outcomes page: 3
23
are used.
Theories presentation
The introduction to theory
on the symbol will be given
throughout the
Psychodramatic action. To
that end, it is
recommended that the
director prepare and use
an outline in order to link
together the relevant
theoretical aspects
throughout the workshop,
based on the information
that appears in the
exercises.
The inclusion of theoretical
aspects during the
workshop is left in the
hands of the director. It is
not necessary to explain all
of the content, just review
the following key concepts:
The difference
between sign and
symbol.
The rule of ‘free
association’.
Explicit and implicit
content in symbols.
Spontaneity and
creativity.
Role-playing.
Functions of
intermediary objects in
the Psychodrama
session.
Theory Pages 5-22.
Exercise example to work
with the theory, page 22.
24
Participants can also find
deeper information in the
training materials and in
the specific bibliography
utilised to complete the
theory of this module.
Exercises and activities The trainer of this module
can find an introduction to
the exercises and also a
simple pre-exercise to
explain to the participants
how they can choose the
best exercise to perform in
the classroom according to
their needs and goals.
Index exercises:
Puppets
Cards and
postcards
Masks
Painting-Drawing
Sculptures
Acting roles
Acting Objects
Imaginative
exercises
Exercises with
music and
movement
Introduction to the
exercises page: 23-24
Pre-exercise ‘identify your
objectives. Page: 24.
Considerations for the
educator and risks, pages:
25-26.
Exercises pages: 23-45
25
2.8. Module 7: Role playing
Category
Instructions
References
Time
Short presentation
of module, aims,
method and
trainers. 15 minutes
Warm-up exercise
15-30 minutes
Introduction for
learners (module
presentation, aims/
scope etc, theory
presentation): 1-2
hours
Activities/exercises/
discussion: 3 -5
hours
Evaluation: 1 hour
Structure and time pages:
22-23
Materials
Colorful scarves
Paper and
pens/pencils for
writing/drawing
Colored remnant
(scamp of cloth)
Masks
Hats
Colored paint
(tempera)
Music and music
player
Various magazines
on sport, hunting,
society,
entertainment,
Materials pages: 24-29
26
nature, etc
Scissors, glue,
pens and crayons
Learning outcomes
Learners are expected to
be able to:
To explain the
principles of role-
playing and its
possible benefits
for educational
practice in VET
To list three role-
playing techniques
and argue why and
how they can
(cannot) be applied
in the participants’
own practice
To propose and run
an appropriate role-
playing exercise to
respond to a
particular
problem/challenge
in a group of adult
learners
To discuss with
group about the
experience
Learning outcomes page
23
Theories presentation
Theoretical background:
Definition
Role definition
Group definition
Among role and
group in
psychodrama
Theory pages: 3-13
27
Distinction between
role-playing an
psychodrama
Methods and
applicative contexts
Application of these
key theories in
education
Educational role-
playing
The director’s role
Construction of a
role-playing session
Settling
construction and
classroom learning
Exercises and activities List of exercises/ activities:
The first day
An ordinary day
How others see me
My future
My doubts
The beautiful and
the ugly
What will be
What I wanted to
say
I say it to myself
Non- structured
Role playing
Exercises pages: 24-27
2.9. Module 8: Sharing with the group
Category
Instructions
References
Time Pre-session preparation for Structure pages: 4-5
28
learners (module
presentation: aims/ scope
etc, theory presentation:
brief introduction to the
theories): 1-2 hours
Session: exercises/
discussion with learners: 7
hours
Evaluation: 1 hour (this
should be done by trainer
and participant after the
workshop, and send by
email).
Materials
Specific materials, if any, are
indicated in the training
materials exercises.
Sheets
Colored pencils
Pillows
Exercises pages: 23-35
Learning outcomes
Explain the importance
of the use of sharing in
education practice.
Suggest diverse sharing
techniques and identify
their possible function.
Choose exercises that
are appropriate to the
objectives set out.
Understand the
importance of protecting
and maintaining the
integrity of both the
group and the
individual.
Integrate the use of
sharing with active
Aims and learning
outcomes page: 4
29
Psychodramatic
techniques.
Develop a simple
Psychodramatic
exercise, orientated
towards adult education,
in which sharing
exercises for a real life
classroom situation are
used.
Theories presentation
The trainer can decide how to
explain the main concepts of
this module. Anyway, is
especially important to explain
some points to participants
during the workshop as:
Guidelines for the sharing
session
The role of the leader
Ethical concerns
Participants can also find
deeper information in the
training materials and in the
specific bibliography utilised to
complete the theory of this
module.
Guidelines for the
sharing session page:
12
The role of the leader
pages: 14-18
Ethical concerns
pages: 19-22
Exercises and activities The trainer of this module can
find an introduction to the
exercises explaining the aims
of them. The training materials
for this workshop also included
several well detailed exercises
and the trainer can choose one
to perform during the lesson
Introduction of the
exercises page: 23
Exercises pages: 23-35
30
according to his / her
preferences. Index exercises:
What you say is
important
Learning about sharing
Sharing action
Not listening
The nosy ball
Reasons to be here
Exchange of problems
Who am I?
A name, letters, words
and sentence
Yes or no
Presentation
Money
Sharing statements
Take for a dance
Write a story
Positive pyramid
Bullseye
Stand up together
Once upon a time
Drawing names to let go
Affirmation circle
Allowing departure
Wrap up hug
31
3. Evaluation
3.1. 3.1 Evaluation Form for Workshop Director in Psychodramatic exercises
This template is an orientation for the trainer in order to facilitate his/ her evaluation of the psychodramatic exercise performed during the workshop.
It can be applied to every module.
Indicator Description Evaluation scale 1 2 3 4
Understanding the importance of protecting and maintaining the integrity of both the group and the individual.
Evaluating whether the participant has understood this concept, and whether they apply it correctly when doing the exercises
The participant has not understood the concept and does not apply it in the exercises.
When carrying out the exercises, the participant's proposals demonstrate that they have understood the importance of this responsibility but they do not apply it effectively.
The participant understands the importance of this responsibility, and is able to demonstrate so by applying it in the exercises and generating an appropriate atmosphere of respect.
Using and understanding symbols /sociometry, sharing, warm up, etc. techniques in the workshop
Ability to propose symbols and techniques that have relevant content, conducive to the education process
The symbols and techniques proposed are not relevant to the education process because they are not fully understood.
The symbols and techniques presented are well identified but they are not relevant to the classroom.
The symbols and techniques proposed are correct and facilitate the education process in the classroom.
Applying symbols /sociometry, sharing, warm up, etc. techniques in their own classroom
Ability to apply the techniques for working with symbols /sharing / sociometry, etc. in the classroom in order to improve the education process.
They are not able to apply any of the proposed techniques.
They carry out the proposed exercises, as taught and without difficulty.
They apply the techniques, as taught, and introduce variations when required.
They are able to perform the exercises as taught and to create new ones that are adapted to their specific needs in the classroom.
Identifying To Does not Recognises the Identifies the
32
situations in which symbols / sociometry / warm up, etc. are useful
determine whether working with symbols /sharing / warm up / sociometry,etc. can revitalise a typical classroom situation, according to the needs of that situation.
recognise the situations where working with symbols / warm up / sociometry / sharing, etc. can be of use.
situations but does not propose appropriate exercises.
situations in which working with symbols / sociometry / warm up / sharing, etc. is useful, and proposes exercises that are adapted to each case.
Understanding latent dynamics
Ability to observe and recognise underlying processes that may block the education process.
Does not recognise the underlying processes that are giving rise to the educational blockage.
Intuitively knows some underlying processes but is not able to identify them clearly.
Recognises underlying processes that are taking place in the classroom and causing an obstacle to learning.
Learning to share the experience of the Psychodramatic action.
Ability to give space to the participants so they may share their experience of the dramatic action.
Does not respect others' opinions and does not open the space up for their classmates to share freely.
Respects the turns of the others but when participating themselves they make judgements and comments on the others' experiences.
Respects the turns of the others and shares their own experience but they analyse and judge their classmates' experiences.
Respects the turns of the others, expresses their own experiences, and does not judge nor analyse the experiences recounted by their classmates.
33
3.2. 3.2 Evaluation Reports Template for Workshop Director
Module __: “__________________________________”
Name of workshop director: _____________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
This template is an orientation for the workshop director in order to facilitate his/ her evaluation of training materials representing each module of PaTiE Training Programme.
It can be applied to every module.
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Have I achieved the learning outcomes proposed in training material for this module? Please, explain below: _______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
A2. Have I noticed a change in the participants’ perception of group work? Please, explain below:
34
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
A3. Please present briefly how you performed this module in the class; refer any obstacles or problems that you might confronted during the workshop.
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
Signature
35
3.3. 3.3 Evaluation Forms for Course Participants (1 form per
Module)
Module 1: “The Experiential Method of Psychodrama”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Do you believe that psychodrama can influence your perception of group work and educational practice? Please, explain your answer:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
A2. Can you see feasible ways of integrating the specific psychodrama approaches and techniques in the process of VET adult education?
□ Yes □ No
Please, explain your answer:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
A3. Do you see possible threats on using Psychodrama outside the therapeutic context?
36
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
A4. Give your responses to the following table according to your level
of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
37
Module 2: “Warm Up”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Please identify the benefits of warm-up techniques and their relevance for education:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
A2. Do you feel able to present a set of warm-up techniques in your adult classes?
□ Yes □ No
If yes, please list below which of them and explain:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
38
A3. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
39
Module 3: “The Power of the Group”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Are you able to explain the principles of group and group dynamic and their possible benefits from their implementation in VET?
□ Yes □ No
Please, explain the benefits:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
A2. Do you have a clear idea on the further steps you would need to take to plan/modify your curricula in order to better focus on group dynamics?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
________________________________________________
40
A3. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
41
Module 4: “Sociometric Group Mapping”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Are you able to explain the principles of sociometry and its possible application in educational practice in VET?
□ Yes □ No
Please, explain the applicability of sociometric techniques in adult VET classes:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
A2. What benefits do you identify of sociometric techniques in giving insight into group structure and facilitating team building and conflict management?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
________________________________________________
42
A3. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
43
Module 5: “Conflict Management”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Do you consider that conflict management techniques could be applied in VET adult classes?
□ Yes □ No
A2. If yes, could you list two or three exercises that refer to conflict management and explain how these can be applied in class?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
A3. What could be the differences between your current way of dealing
with conflict and psychodramatic ones?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
44
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
A4. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
45
Module 6: “Working with Symbols”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Please, explain the importance of the use of symbology in education practice:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
A2. Could you describe a simple Psychodramatic exercise, orientated towards adult education, in which symbols for a real life classroom situation are used?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
46
A3. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
47
Module 7: “Role Playing”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Do you consider that role-playing techniques could benefit the educational practice in VET?
□ Yes □ No
If yes, please explain why:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
A2. Which “Role Playing” exercises would you apply in your own VET classes and why?
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
________________________________________________
48
A3. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
49
Module 8: “Sharing with the Group”
Name of participant: ___________________________________________________
Date: ____/____/2015
Please, answer the following questions:
A1. Please, explain the importance of the use of sharing in education practice:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
______________________________________________
A2. Are you able to present a set of “Sharing” techniques in your adult VET classes?
□ Yes □ No
If yes, please list below which of them you would apply in which situation and why:
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
50
_______________________________________________________
_____________________________________________
A3. Give your responses to the following table according to your level of agreement with the given statements and using the following key. Mark your answers with a circle:
1. Entirely disagree 2. Mostly disagree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Neither agree nor disagree 5. Somewhat agree 6. Mostly agree 7. Entirely agree
I view the situation in the group differently now. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I think using this type of technique has been helpful for my own development.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Following the exercise, I feel that the whole team is more integrated. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have been able to express my opinions and participate in front of the other group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I felt part of the group and I have participated keenly in the course. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In general, I feel more motivated after taking part in the exercise. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I trust my fellows more. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand and appreciate the differences that exist between the group members.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I understand my fellows better and have more respect for them. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have more confidence in my own abilities. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
51
3.4. 3.4 Evaluation of the results
As can be seen, the Evaluation Form for Workshop Director proposes a 1, 2, 3,
4 grading, with 4 being the highest grade and corresponding to a more complete
learning. Each row of these templates corresponds to a competence or ability that
the adult participants should obtain thanks to the workshop training. The letters
indicate the level to which each competence has been understood. It is the
workshop director's responsibility, therefore, to check the results they have
obtained; whether the students do not understand certain competences because
the latter are at too advanced a level, or because the exercises are not really
orientated towards acquiring them, etc. These are the elements the director should
consider in their final evaluation of the workshop.
It is also very important that the workshop director, apart from giving a
numeric/quantitative evaluation to the workshop, also writes a report gathering the
more qualitative insights from the session. Psychodrama interventions have an
important emotional component that emerges through gleams of diverse types of
expression that cannot be expressed by numeric evaluation but are often more
important to the functioning of the group and the activity. That is why the workshop
director should write the Evaluation Report Template to be able to track the
progress of the group throughout the time.
The Evaluation Forms for Course Participants are a combination of open
questions and Likert scales. Both the workshop director and the participant can
add new statements to all the suggested questionnaires, provided they think it
necessary for carrying out a full evaluation. The results obtained from a Likert
scale are calculated by summing all the numbers indicated in each Likert item.
Minimum and maximum results are then established. These are calculated by
summing the lowest number on the scale – 1 – as many times as the number of
statements. So, in the case of item 1 suggested here; 1+1+1. For the maximum
result, 7 is summed as many times as the number of statements, in this case;
7+7+7. So, the minimum in this case is 3, and the maximum is 21. When
evaluating the result of a questionnaire, we can say that if it is close to 5 then the
attitude of that teacher with regard to their exercise is somewhat unfavourable. A
score of 17 indicates a highly favourable attitude.
52
In order to obtain the average result of a questionnaire, the PT/NT formula is
applied, where PT is the total number of points on the scale, obtained by summing
all the responses, and NT is the total number of statements.
I have achieved the objectives set out 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have noticed a change in the classroom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
I have protected the integrity and wellbeing of the students during
the exercise
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
In this example, PT would be: 11 / NT: 3= 3.6, which is a medium-low evaluation in
the 1-to-7 scale suggested. In any case, analysing the answers separately is
useful for seeing the details and gaining a better understanding of the attitude of
the respondent.
53
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bielskie Stowarzyszenie Artystyczne Teatr Grodzki (2009) GUIDELINES ON PSYCHODRAMA USE IN ADULT EDUCATION. POTENS multilateral Grundtvig project.
Blatner, A. (2002) Role Playing in Education, http://www.blatner.com/adam/pdntbk/rlplayedu.htm
Serafin, E. (2004) Psychodrama in der Erwachsenenbildung. (Psychodrama in the adult education) in F. von Ameln, R. Gerstmann, J. Kramer (eds) Psychodrama, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
54