Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

27
Working Together: The Path Forward December 5, 2012 The “Fiscal Cliff” – Impacts on Western Maryland 1

Transcript of Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Page 1: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Working Together: The Path Forward

December 5, 2012

The “Fiscal Cliff” – Impacts on Western Maryland

1

Page 2: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Summary • Maryland - The Products of our Partnership • Our “Skin in the Game” • Urgent Need for Fiscal Order • Elements of the “Fiscal Cliff” • Downsides to Alternatives to the “Fiscal Cliff” • Helpful Strategy and Advocacy

2

Page 3: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Creating Jobs is Our #1 Priority

30,300 new jobs in 2011

Unemployment rate driven down to lowest level in three years

Expanding Skills & Opportunity

#1 Best Public Schools in America in 2011 – 4th Year in a Row

A Safer Maryland for Families

Lowest Crime Level Since 1975

Smart, Green and Growing

Achieved 2-Year Milestone Targets for Reducing Pollutants into the Chesapeake Bay

A Healthier Maryland

Expanded Health Care to 309,000 Previously Uninsured Marylanders Since 2007

Where We Are Today…

“…Progress on one of these fronts requires progress on all....” 3

Page 4: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Fiscal Responsibility

Meeting Spending Affordability Committee Guidelines for 6 years

A balanced approach to budgeting that includes $7.5 billion in cuts (including proposed FY2013 budget)

An improved fiscal climate that led to higher fund balances at the end of FY2011

A Triple A bond rating certified by all three rating agencies

Maryland is one of only 8 states; ratings re-affirmed in 2012

Making Government Work

"The rating reflects what we view as the state's diverse, broad-based economy,

which has historically outperformed the national economy...The stable outlook

reflects what we view as Maryland's economic strength and historically strong

financial and debt management policies. We believe the state has proactively

responded to recent structural budget imbalance and we would expect it to

continue to focus on achieving balance"

- Standard and Poor’s, upon reaffirming MD’s AAA bond rating, February 2012 4

Page 5: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Post-Recession Jobs Recovery

5

Page 6: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

MARYLAND’S INNOVATION ECONOMY

6

Page 7: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

#1 in Federal R&D Obligations (per capita)

#1 concentration of PHD Scientists and Engineers

#2 in Technology and Science

#2 U.S. Chamber of Commerce Innovation Ranking

#3 Kauffman New Economy Index

INNOVATION: ASSETS

7

Page 8: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

LARGEST PROCUREMENT CONTRACT RECIPIENTS, 2010

Recipient of Contract(s) Total, All Contracts

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION $1,630,871,661

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY $954,432,026

SAIC, INC. $916,726,538

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION $817,647,521

CLARK ENTERPRISES, INC. $577,411,784

TEXTRON INC. $568,626,191

BAE SYSTEMS PLC $558,452,434

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES $518,766,628

COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION $502,516,796

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. $427,408,907

Source: USASpending.gov

8

Page 9: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

JOBS CREATED BY PROCUREMENT CONTRACT SPENDING, 2010

Direct Indirect Induced Total

Non-Defense 98,212 30,315 51,692 180,219

Defense 73,086 28,095 33,913 135,074

Total 171,298 58,410 85,605 315,293

The 315,293 jobs created or supported by Federal procurement contract spending in Maryland in 2010 represented 9.4 percent of all jobs in that year.

Source: IMPLAN Analysis of USASpending.gov data by DBED

9

Page 10: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Employment Impacts of Federal Spending in Maryland, 2010

Spending Type Resident Employees

Direct Jobs

Indirect Jobs

Induced Jobs

Total Jobs Created

MD Federal

Government Jobs 218,416 - - 218,416

Fed-Employed

MD Residents 314,296 - - 149,202 149,202

Contractor Jobs 171,298 58,410 85,605 315,293

Grant-Funded

Jobs 79,648 18,307 40,177 138,131

Total Jobs 314,296 469,362 76,717 274,984 821,042

Note: To avoid double-counting, resident employees are not counted in the jobs total. 10

Page 11: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

CONCLUSIONS

• Federal spending was responsible for an estimated 821,000 jobs in Maryland in 2010. – These represented 24% of all jobs

– But note that numbers are estimates based on a model

• By all measures, Maryland is a major R&D center for the Federal government.

• Maryland ranks 4th in total federal procurement expenditures, although it ranks 19th in population. – Federal contracts are an important source of jobs in

MD (almost 10% in 2010)

11

Page 12: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

12

Federal Assets

17

Military installations

77

Non-military installations

60

Federal Labs

Highly Skilled Workforce

286,422 Federal workers

$24.2B Wages

171,994 Employed in MD

$22.6B State GDP [7.6%]

140,417 Jobs supported by MD-based federal

workers

Federal Procurement

$26B

Procurement $$

4th

Total Procurement

180,219 Jobs created by

procurement $$

Research & Development

$1.57B

Federal R&D Grants

$9.7M

SBIR/STTR Funding

21,455 Jobs created R&D

Grant Spending

Source: Maryland Department of Business and Economic Development

Page 13: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

How Urgent is the Need for Deficit Reduction?

13

Page 14: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

14

Long-Term Debt is Unsustainable

Page 15: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Current Policies Are Not Sustainable

15 Source: Projections based on CBO data.

Page 16: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Under Current Policy Projections, Debt Climbs to Nearly 200% of GDP in the Next 25 Years

Source: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid – “Exchanges: A Proposed New Federal-State Partnership”

(September 19, 2011)

16

1987-2011

Average

2012 2022 2037

Spending

Medicare 2.5 3.7 4.5 6.7

Medicaid 1.2 1.7 3.0 3.7

Social Security 4.4 5.0 5.4 6.2

Discretionary & Other Mandatory Spending 10.3 11.6 7.8 9.6

Nondefense (3.7) (4.1) (2.8) *

Defense (4.2) (4.3) (3.2) *

Other Mandatory (2.4) (3.2) (1.8) *

Interest 2.4 1.4 3.7 9.5

Total Spending 20.8 23.4 24.3 35.7

Revenues 17.9 15.7 18.5 18.5

Deficits -2.9 -7.7 -5.9 -17.2

Debt 44 73 93 199

Source: CBO. Other Mandatory consists of: federal civilian and military retirement payments; unemployment compensation; programs for the poor; veterans’ benefits; and other spending. CBO does not separately forecast Nondefense, Defense, and Other Mandatory for 2037.

Page 17: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Unprecedented Uncertainty:

The Elements of the Fiscal Cliff

• Sequester

• Expiration of tax cuts

• Expiration of payroll tax holiday

• Expiration of extended unemployment benefits

• AMT increases

• “Doc Fix”

• Continuing Resolution (CR)

• TANF expiration

• Debt Limit

17

Page 18: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Budget Control Act and Cuts

• Round 1 of BCA is already in effect – to reduce spending by $900 billion over 10 years.

• If sequester hits, Round 2 would take effect - $109 billion in defense and non-defense spending of about $55 billion from each.

• About 18% of federal grants to states subject to across-the-board cuts in FY 2013 if sequester isn’t avoided.

Source: Pew Center on the States, “The Impact of the Fiscal Cliff on States (Nov. 2012) 18

Page 19: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Fiscal Cliff Would Hit Northeast & Midwest Hardest (Total employment, % change from baseline forecast, 2014)

-1.4 to -1.9

-1.9 to -2.1

-2.1 to -2.6

U.S.= -2%

Sources: Census Bureau, Moody’s Analytics 19

Page 20: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

20

Page 21: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Downside Risks of Alternatives to the Fiscal Cliff

• The current rate of growth in spending is likely unsustainable for federal & state governments & will be cut in any grand budget agreement.

• There is broad agreement of the need for tax reform that lowers rates to make us more competitive & reduces tax expenditures but any review of tax expenditures will involve those provisions that are most beneficial to states.

• There are likely to be further cuts to the discretionary grant programs on which states depend as the savings from limiting entitlement growth & reforming the tax system are unlikely to be big enough to hit debt targets.

• Infrastructure spending by the federal government will decline, especially transportation.

21

Page 22: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Top 10 Tax Expenditures (2013, in billions of dollars)

22

Rank Tax Expenditure Cost

1 Exclusion of employer payments for health insurance 181

2 Provisions that benefit states 105

Deductibility of state & local income, sales & property taxes (69)

Exclusion of interest on public purpose state & local bonds (36)

3 Deductibility of mortgage interest on owner occupied homes 101

4 Treatment of 401(k)-type retirement plans 73

5 Treatment of capital gains 62

6 Treatment of employer pension plans 52

7 Exclusion of imputed rental income 51

8 Deductibility of charitable contributions 49

9 Deferral of income from controlled foreign corporations 42

10 Accelerated depreciation of machinery & equipment 33

Source: Fiscal Year 2013 Budget of the U.S. Government, Analytical Perspectives, Table 17-3.

Page 23: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Keeping $200B in the Economy

• Critically important for Congress to extend middle class tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses.

• A typical middle class family of four could see its taxes rise by $2,200.

• We need as much certainty in the economy as possible to maintain continuous activity – which translates to continued job creation in Western Maryland.

• If Congress acts quickly, we can prevent a hit to consumer spending which is roughly 70% of the U.S. economy.

23

Page 24: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 TOTAL

Defense 8 11 14 17 20 23 28 32 36 189

NDD -38 -115 -118 -120 -120 -124 -127 -130 -135 -1,026

Total -30 -104 -104 -102 -101 -100 -99 -98 -98 -837

24

Page 25: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Other Contributors to Downside Risks

• The current CR & the TANF authorization expire March 27

• Next year the following programs will need to be reauthorized: – Elementary & Secondary Education Act

– Workforce Investment Act

– Defense programs

– Farm programs

25

Page 26: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Actions to Avoid or Mitigate Downside Risks

• Track & influence proposals & legislation that avoid the fiscal cliff

– See, for example, Framework for a Grand Bargain to Avoid the Fiscal Cliff

• Using must-pass legislation as a vehicle for priorities that will generate state revenue, such as Marketplace Fairness

• Establishing a Tax Reform Task Force (Governors)

26

Page 27: Hagerstown breakfast discussion 12.5.12 for public

Framework for a Grand Bargain to Avoid the Fiscal Cliff

• Require new Congress to produce a debt reduction package that would reduce federal debt by $4 trillion over a decade.

• Turn off the fiscal cliff & impose a legislative “backstop” that would automatically become law if the new Congress failed to pass the package.

• Enact a 2013 down payment of tax & spending changes in the lame duck to offset some of the fiscal cliff & as part of the larger package.

• Deficit reduction should not further reduce funding for “non-defense discretionary programs,” which is already slated for deep cuts in the years ahead in order to meet the austere “caps” (or ceilings on the total amount of funding) the Budget Control Act placed on funding for these programs.

27