H NCEO 2001 Global Equity Compensation Forum Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan Issues for New or...
-
Upload
barnaby-park -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of H NCEO 2001 Global Equity Compensation Forum Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan Issues for New or...
h
NCEO 2001 Global Equity Compensation Forum
Global Employee Stock Purchase Plan Issues for New or Future Plans
Lorraine E. Cohen, San Francisco
November 5, 2001
2© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
Agenda
• What’s happening in the world today?
• What should be considered when developing an ESPP?
• Country specific examples
3© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
What’s Happening in the World Today
• The number of companies operating some form of global share plan continues to grow
4© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
What’s Happening in the World Today
• The number of companies operating broad based global share plans is also increasing
5© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
What’s Happening in the World Today
The prevalence of discounted share purchase plans:
6© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
Reason companies offer broad based global share plans
Per 2001 Andersen Survey
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Incentivizeemployees
Encourage shareownership
Tax efficientremuneration
Recruitment andretention
Match competitivepractice
Generate corporateidentity
NorthAmerica
ContinentalEurope
UK
7© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
What should be considered when developing an ESPP?
• Plan Design
• General Implementation Issues
• Mobile Employee Considerations
• The Importance of Internal Consensus
• Tax Considerations
• Financial and Accounting Considerations
• Legal and Regulatory Considerations
8© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
Plan Design
• One worldwide plan?
• One U.S. plan and one international plan?
• Use of subplans
9© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
Plan Design (Continued)
• Are there any minimum service requirements?
• What is the accumulation period?
• What are the relevant grant dates?
• What is the discount on the purchase?
• What are the enrollment periods / dates?
• Are there changes to the elections?
10© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
General Implementation Issues
• Mechanisms to allow refunds of employee contributions (e.g., if leave, move country)?
• Pay interest on amounts held prior to stock purchase (may be required by law in some locations)?
• Exchange rate protect employee?
11© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
General Implementation Issues (Continued)
• Require stock holding period?– Retention feature (e.g., suspend participation if employee sells prematurely)
– Ensure favorable tax treatment (e.g., in France)
• Paper vs.. electronic enrollment (written
signature may be required in some locations)?
• Local translations in some locations?– May vary by region (e.g., French, Flemish in Belgium)
12© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Development of tax planning opportunities– Avoidance of double taxation
• Administration with respect to internationally mobile employees– Recordkeeping is key for compliance with local withholding and reporting
obligations
• Policy for sourcing deductions:– Who do we charge for what?
– How do we track it?
Mobile Employee Considerations
13© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
The Importance of Internal Consensus
• All company groups must be involved in the decision making process
• Establish working group of HR, Treasury, Legal, Tax, Accounting, and Payroll
• Schedule regular meetings/conference calls to address progress
• Set up regional geographic champions
• While making design and implementation decisions, it is essential that senior management approve decisions as they are being made
14© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Employee taxation– Timing (tax on match may depend on dividend/voting rights)
– Types of taxes imposed (crisis taxes, communal taxes, surtaxes)
– Evaluation of NET pay impact
• Employer taxation – Types of tax imposed (fringe benefit taxes, social taxes, payroll taxes)
– Deductibility of company match
Tax Considerations
• Caution: Tax rates vary around the world.
• Example: The employer social tax rates in Sweden are about 33% uncapped!
15© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Corporate reporting and withholding– Timing of remittances to authorities
– Annual reporting specific to stock awards separate from regular compensation?
• Optimization of tax benefits for employee and employer– Mitigation of social taxes
– Deferral of taxation / capital gains tax treatment for employees
Tax Considerations (Continued)
16© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Is it a non-compensatory plan under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)?– General U.S. GAAP allows up to a 15% discount before the Plan is
considered compensatory (APB 25)
– New accounting standard allow for only a 5% discount (FAS 123)
– Since most companies are still able to report under original standards, plans with up to a 15% discount are noncompensatory and do not report compensation expense related to such plans
• Local country GAAP?
• Who bears cost for company match?
• Timing for re-charges for company match?
Financial and Accounting Considerations
17© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Securities Law – Prospectus requirements
• Company Law– Fundamental legality of plan
Legal and Regulatory Considerations
• Caution: Some issues can have consequences other than financial, depending on the country.
• Case in point: Failure to file forms reporting option benefits in Singapore is a misdemeanor and the directors may be subject to fines and/or imprisonment.
18© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Exchange Control Restrictions– Registration of plan with authorities
– Limitations on transfer of funds to purchase stock
– Implications for corporate recharges
• Employment Law– Data protection --Acquired rights
– Works councils --Legality of payroll deductions
– Discrimination issues
Legal and Regulatory Considerations (Continued)
• Caution: In some countries, it is illegal to discriminate against part-time workers
• Example: In Germany, this discrimination is considered indirect sexual discrimination, as part-time jobs are usually held by women. Therefore, part-time employees must be allowed to participate in the ESPP.
19© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
Summary of issues considered in broad based global share plans
Per 2001 Andersen Survey
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Tax issues
Legal issues
Local cultural issues
Local businesspractices
NorthAmerica
ContinentalEurope
UK
21© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Securities Law– The Companies Act 1985 and the Financial Services Act 1986 (“FSA”)
generally permit a company (including a non-UK company) to offer shares to its, or its subsidiaries’, employees
– Section 57 FSA prohibits anyone other than an authorized person from issuing an “investment advertisement” (any invitation to acquire or sell shares). However, there is a specific exemption for an investment advertisement issued in connection with an employee share plan
• Exchange Control– None
• Tax– Possible to implement tax-favored arrangement:
• All Employee Share Ownership Plan (AESOP)• Savings Related Share Option (SAYE) Plan
United Kingdom - Overview
22© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
United Kingdom - Tax-Qualified PlanAll-Employee Share Ownership Plan (1)
• Operates by way of an employee trust
• Highly tax efficient for employees– Allows employees to contribute on pre-tax basis
– If shares held in trust for five years no tax at all when shares given to employees
– Tax efficiency extends to company match
• Highly tax efficient for company– Employer entitled to deduction based on gross salary
– No National Insurance (11.9%) on shares held in trust for 5 years
• However, contribution limits may require “spill over” into non-qualified plan
23© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
United Kingdom - Tax-Qualified PlanAll-Employee Share Ownership Plan (2)
• Main Features – Partnership shares
• Employees may allocate up to 10% of pre-tax salary up to a maximum of £125 per month (£1,500 per year) to buy partnership shares
– Matching shares• Employer may provide up to 2 matching shares for each partnership share
purchased by the employee
– Free shares• Employer may provide up to £3,000 per year of free shares to employees
• Shares must be held in a UK resident trust
• Employees are entitled to dividends while shares in trust
• Employees rights to vote on shares in trust can be restricted
24© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
United Kingdom - Tax-Qualified PlanSavings Related Share Option Plan (1)
• Operates by way of a savings contract with a bank/building society
• Not possible to replicate company match
• Tax efficient for employees– No tax at the time of purchase of the shares
• Tax efficient for company– Employer entitled to deduction for the costs of setting up the plan
– No National Insurance payable on shares transferred to employee
• However, contribution limits may require “spill over” into non-qualified plan
25© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
United Kingdom - Tax-Qualified PlanSavings Related Share Option Plan (2)
• Main Features– Option is coupled with a savings contract (from grant to exercise)
– Options must be offered to all employees on the same terms (although new joiners can be excluded for up to 5 years)
– Savings contract can run for 3, 5 or 7 years from grant
– Exercise price can be set at a discount of up to 20% of market value of shares at grant
– Employees can save between £5 and £250 every month
– Interest received on the savings is tax-free
– Options normally lapse on leaving employment (other than in compassionate circumstances)
26© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
• Securities Law– The public offer of shares by a company to more than 100 participants
requires the prior approval of the Commission des Opérations de Bourse (“COB”)
– If a Plan d’Epargne d’Entreprise implemented, the bank will conduct the necessary securities filings
• Exchange Control– None
• Tax– Possible to implement a tax-favored arrangement (Plan d’Epargne
d’Entreprise)
– However, contribution limits may require “spill over” into non-qualified plan
France - Overview
27© 2001 Arthur Andersen All rights reserved.
France - Tax-Qualified PlanPlan d’Epargne d’Entreprise
• Main Features – Collective employee savings plan designed to encourage creation of a share
portfolio in common with other employees
– Plan must be offered to all employees (although minimum service requirement of up to 6 months can be required)
– Employees can contribute up to 25% of annual gross salaries on an after-tax basis
– Employer can match up to three times (with a ceiling of FF15,000 per annum) the employee’s savings (“abondement”)
– Employer match is free of income tax and social security to participants provided not withdrawn within 5 years. However, it is subject to the C.S.G. and the C.R.D.S surtaxes on 95% of the contribution