Group Case Study
of 5
Transcript of Group Case Study
-
7/30/2019 Group Case Study
1/5
Group Case Study (CE53004-3)
Marking Scheme
1) General Overview
This Module requires the students to work in teams of four (4) to:
1) Analyse the Case Study scenario including interviewing designated members of staff who will role
play.
2) Produce Project Management Documentation
3) Produce a Detailed Analysis Documentation
4) Produce a Requirements Specification for a solution
5) Produce a Design
6) Produce a Functioning Prototype solution together with relevant system and user documentation
7) Organize and Document Regular Group Meetings - these can be in the timetabled classes and / or
other times as convenient, however, the group will need to produce Weekly Logbook enteries.8) Make Presentations as a group, interim and final presentations
9) Each team member is required to produce a Critical Report of the process and outcomes
2) Module Assessment
Assessment for the module for each student will be based on the following:
1) A group mark. This is modearted for individual students by peer group assessment.
2) Individual marks from presentations.
3) An individual report which critically appraises the process of the group and the final product.
Proportional Allocation is:
No. Task Marks Effort
1 Initial Project Plan 5% Group
2 Analysis and Outline Design 20% Group
3 Log Book 5% Individual
4 Artifact 25% Group
5 Final Documentations 15% Group
6 Presentation (Interim) 5% Individual
7 Presentation (Final) 10% Individual
8 Critical Appraisal (Individual Report) 15% Individual
Final Documentation should include:
1) System Documentation
2) User Documentation
3) Peer Group Assessment
-
7/30/2019 Group Case Study
2/5
Assessments should be submitted as follows:
1) Project Plan (MS.Project)
Submit in the class - Gantt Chart and the Plan
2) Log Book
Submit in copy in the classroom
3) Analysis and Design
Documentation Hardcopy and presentation slides during interim presentation
4) System Documentation and Artifact
Documentation Hardcopy and Softcopy of Artifact to the Admin
5) Individual Report
Hardcopy to be submitted to the Admin
3) Marking for Project Plan
Group Marks 5%
Criteria Marks
A full plan indicating tasks, sub tasks, milestones, division of labour risk analysis etc
A plan which meets most of the above criteria but falls short in some minor aspects
A plan which meets most of the above criteria but falls significantly short inone/more area
A minimal plan showing task start and end dates
A plan that does not make it clear what is to be done
Non submission
5
4
3
2
1
0
4) Analysis and Outline Design
Group Marks 20%
Area Weightage Criteria
Research 3 Summary of Interviews and document searches
Analysis 3 Key points from above and clarifications whererequired
Design1) Requirements2) ER model3) DFD Set4) Outputs Design5) Support Documents
33322
Concise Requirements for complete new systemDatabase DesignFunctionality of the systemScreen design etcExplanations added to diagrams and other doc ELH etc
Plan 1 Clearly stating what you intend ti develop and notdevelop and by whom
Total 20%
-
7/30/2019 Group Case Study
3/5
The aims of the Systems Analysis and Design is to show that you understood the problem and have a
clear idea of what you intend to produce:
1) While the old system is important as a reference you should put your efforts into explaining the
new system and how it will meet the requirements specified.
2) You should have been introduced to several methodologies while on your course and you are at
liberty to use whatever tools and techniques you feel appropriate.
3) However the aim is to explain your proposed solution and it will be marked against the following
marking scheme.
5) Interim Presentation
Individual Marks 5%
Topic Weightage Member A Member B Member C Member D
What you have achieved
What else you intend to do
When you intend to do it
What success & failures youhave found
Questions and Answers
1
1
1
1
1
Total 5%
Each group will be allocated a 20 minute slot, 5% of the marks will be allocated to the group but only
those group members who actively contribute will receive the marks.
6) Log Book
Individual Marks 5%Criteria Marks Member A Member B Member C Member D
Detail log book with actual deliverablefor each week and on time
Log book that meets most of theabove criteria but falls shorts in minoraspects
Log book which meets most of theabove criteria but falls significantlyshort in one/more area
A basic log book with lack informationon the delivarables
A basic log book that is not clear onwhat is done or to be done
Non submission
5
4
3
2
1
0
Total 5%
The log book format will be provided by the module lecturer and a copy of the log book should be
submitted in the classroom.
-
7/30/2019 Group Case Study
4/5
7) Artifact
Group Marks 25%
Criteria Weightage Marks Comments
Language Selection
Input Form - ComplaintOutput Form - NotificationCommunication ModuleAction/Response PageList of Issues- departmentReport - IssueReport - ActionVerification/ ValidationOthers
2
333333311
Total 25%
8) Final Documentation
Group Marks 15% which includes:
System Documentation - Group 10%
Area Weightage Marks
Information for competent Access Programmer to amend/ update thesystemSummary of what has been implementedBrief description of queries and reports with associated tablesAny interesting code - working out gardes and awardsTesting of output - outcome
22222
Total 10%
User Documentation - Group 5%Area Weightage Marks
This should be aimed at a competent Access User
Installation on laptop or server
Description of facilities available
If you describe facilities that are not implemented yet please make this clear
2
1
1
1
Total 5%
Final Documentation Marking
Area Weightage Marks
System Documentation 10%
User Documentation 5%
Total 15%
-
7/30/2019 Group Case Study
5/5
9) Final Presentation
Individual Marks 5%
Topic Weightage Member A Member B Member C Member D
What you have achieved
What else you would havedone with more time
How you did it
Success and improvementsin the development
Questions and Answers
2
2
2
2
2
Total 10%
10) Individual Report
Individual Marks 15%
Area Weightage Member A Member B Member C Member D
Research (project - SAD) 5
Critical Appraisal (process) 5
Conclusion 3
Presentation Format 2
Total 15%
