Group behavior, teams and conflicts
description
Transcript of Group behavior, teams and conflicts
Group behavior, teams and conflicts
UHS 2062 LECTURES at UTM Skudai.Prepared by Siti Rokiah Siwok
IntroductionEmployee seldom work in isolation ( Mullins,
2006).Groups are characteristics of all social situations ( Mullins, 2006). Most employee behaviour takes place in groups or
teams; thus important to understand group dynamics (Aamodt, 2007)
People in groups influence each other in various ways.
Groups may develop hierarchies and leaders .Style of leadership affect groups.
Definition of a groupNo agreed definition. Any no. of people interacting with one
another, psychologically aware of one another and perceived themselves to be in a group ( Schein, 1988 in Mullins 2006). ( elaborate)
A definable membership, group consciousness, shared purpose, interdependence, interaction and ability to act in a unitary manner ( Adair, 1986 in Mullins 2006)
Definition of a groupFour criteria must be met (Gordon,
2001 in Aamodt, 2007): Members see themselves as a unitGroup must provide rewards to
membersMembers of the group share a common
goalCorresponding effects(whatever
happens to a member affects every other member).
Reasons for joining a groupAssignmentPhysical proximity Affiliation (to fulfill the need to be with
people)IdentificationEmotional supportAssistance or helpCommon interestCommon goals
Groups or teams?Not all groups are teams“ Teams occurs when a number of people
have a common goal and recognize that their personal success is dependent on the success of others. They are all interdependent…” ( Crainer, 1998, in Mullins 2006)
Group or team?TEAM GROUP
Size Limited Medium or largeSelection Crucial ImmaterialLeadership Shared or rotating SoloPerception Mutual knowledge
understandingFocus on leader
Style Role spread coordination
Convergence conformism
Spirit Dynamic interaction
Togetherness persecution of opponents
(Belbin, 2000 in Mullins 2006)
Factors affecting Group PerformanceGroup cohesivenessGroup homogeneityStability of
membershipIsolationExternal pressureGroup sizeGroup status
Group ability and confidence
Personality of group members
Communication network
Group rolePresence of othersIndividual
dominance
Factors affecting Group PerformanceGroup cohesiveness
It is the extent to which group members like and trust each other, committed to accomplish a team goal and share a feeling of group pride ( Beale, Cohen, Burke & McLendon, 2003 in Aamodt, 2007)
Group homogeneityIt is the extent to which members are similarHomogeneous or heterogeneous will lead to the best group
performance? Stability of membership
The greater the stability, the greater the cohesivenessThus members who remain for long periods of time are more
cohesive and perform better than groups that have high turnover (Bell, 2005 in Aamodt, 2007)
Factors affecting Group PerformanceIsolation
Group that is isolated tends to be highly cohesiveExternal pressure
Groups that are pressured by external forces tend to be highly cohesive; which can be explained by the phenomena psychological reactance ( Brehm, 1966 in Aamodt, 2007)
Group size Groups are most cohesive and perform best when the
size is small.However, not all small group are always the best; also
depends on the tasks.
Factors affecting Group PerformanceGroup status
The higher the group status, the greater is the cohesiveness; thus a group can be made more cohesive by increasing its status, at least in the eyes of the members.
Group ability and confidenceGroups with high-ability members outperform groups with low-
ability membersGroups whose members believe that their team can be
successful perform better than those whose members are not confident.
Personality of group membersGroups with members who score high in openness and emotional
stability will perform better that groups whose members do not have these characteristics ( Bell, 2005 in Aamodt, 2007)
Factors affecting Group PerformanceCommunication network
Communication network affects groups’ performance
The best network depends on the situation and the goals of the group.
A good leader must choose the best communication network which facilitates the achievement of the group’s goals.
Factors affecting Group PerformanceGroup role
The extent to which the members of a group assume their roles affect group performance
Members roles must fall into one of these categories: (1) task-orientated roles, such as offering new ideas
and coordinating new activities (2) social-oriented roles, such as encouraging
cohesiveness and participation (3) individual role
Factors affecting Group PerformancePresence of others
Social facilitation provides the positive effects of the presence of others, but for easy tasks or well learned tasks.
Individual dominanceIf the leader has an accurate solution to a
problem in the group, then the group performs at high level.
Group conflictsWorking together in a group or teams always
presents the potential for the occurrence of conflicts.
Conflict is the psychological and behavioral reaction to a perception that another person is keeping you from reaching a goal, taking away your right to act in a particular way or violating the expectancies of a relationship.
Key component to conflict is perception.The level of conflict is a function of the
importance of the goal, behavior or relationship.
Dysfunctional and functional conflictsMost conflicts results in lower team
performance, and lower members satisfaction,
Most conflicts are dysfunctional , as the conflicts prevents people from working together, lessens productivity and increases turnover.
Moderate degree of conflict , called functional conflicts can result in better performance- stimulate new ideas, increase friendly competition and increase team effectiveness.
Moderate conflicts reduce the risks of larger conflicts.
Types of conflictsInterpersonal conflictIndividual – group conflictGroup –group conflict
What are the causes of conflicts?
Causes of conflictsCompetition of resourcesTask independenceJurisdictional ambiguityCommunication challengesBeliefsPersonality( Aamodt, 2007)
Conflicting stylesAvoiding styleAccommodating style Forcing styleCollaborating styleCompromising style
Determining conflict styleOrganization Conflict Inventory II
(Rahim and Magner, 1995) Cohen Conflict Response Inventory
(Cohen, 1997)
Resolving conflictPrevention /prior to conflict
occurrenceWhen conflict first occursThird -party intervention
Prior to conflict occurring An organisation should have a formal policy
on how conflict to be handled, which states that :Employees should first try to resolve their own
conflicts If the above is not successful, employees can
utilise a third party intervention Employees should receive training on the
causes of conflict, ways to provent conflict and strategies to resolve it.
When conflict FIRST occursThe two parties should be encouraged to
use conflict resolution skills which they had learned. These skills include: Expressing a desire for cooperationOffering complimentsAvoiding negative interactionEmphasizing mutual similaritiesHighlighting common goals
When conflict FIRST occursKey to resolving conflict is to reduce tension
and increase trust between the 2 parties; which can be accomplished by :Stating an intention to reduce tension Publicly announcing steps to be taken to
reduce tension. Inviting the other side to take action in to
reduce tension. Making sure all initiative are unambiguous.
Third party interventionIf conflict cannot be resolved, good
to seek help-third party intervention, through mediation or arbitration.
Summary Groups consists of multiple members who
perceive themselves as a unit a and sharer common goal or goals
People joining groups due to a need for affiliation, a need for identification with success, a need for emotional support, a need for assistance, common goals , physical proximity and assignment.
Many factors contribute to a group success.
Summary Teams have four developmental stages;
namely forming, storming, norming and performing.
The team approach is not always the best.Conflict has many causes, such as
competition of resources etc.People react to conflict differently Conflict is part of life in an organization
and can be managed wisely and successfully.
Reference:Aamodt, M.G (2007). Industrial
/organizational psychology. An applied approach. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Mullins, L.J. ( 2006). Essentials of Organisational Behaviour. England: Prentice Hall