Group 6 Slides_Updated

18
SUHEL DAHIWAL QUINN BOESLEY JAY MALLINSON ENGGEN 770 Design Project Presentations: Group 6

Transcript of Group 6 Slides_Updated

Page 1: Group 6 Slides_Updated

SUHEL DAHIWAL QUINN BOESLEY JAY MALLINSON

ENGGEN 770 Design Project Presentations:

Group 6

Page 2: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Background Common cause : Direct blow to chest due to car accident 1.2 million people killed every year (WHO report) At least 4 weeks to heal

Page 3: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Focus of the Systematic ReviewAim:To find evidence relating to the use of external rib

bracing for the treatment of rib fracture injuries Question:“For patients with non-flail rib fractures, how much

does the use of an external reinforcing member reduce the healing time compared with patients who don’t use any reinforcing.”

Population Intervention Comparison Outcome

Page 4: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Search strategy

Page 5: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Research Results

3 RCT’s (Quantitative)2 Case and 1 cohort studies (Qualitative)

Pain relief using RIB BELTS - Two groups (pain relief tablets and rib belts) - 25 % reduction in pain (pain scale) - Low sample size (no statistical difference

P=0.28)

Pulmonary complications

Page 6: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Design Requirements

Limit torso movement to reduce patients pain

Minimise impact on respiratory function

Widely applicable to a variety of patients

Be easy to use

Page 7: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Initial Concepts

Compression Shirt / Singlet

Rigid Support with Elastic Binding

Rib Belt with Light Material over Intercostal

Page 8: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Initial Concepts Continued

Multiple Rib BeltsInjection Moulded / 3D Printed

Adhesive Patch with Polymer Inserts

Page 9: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Combined MART Analysis

Page 10: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Initial Prototyping

• Difficult to stretch foam across rib injury

Elastic Foam Top

Velcro Base

Adhesive on underside

Page 11: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Prototype Development

Cut-outs in Foam for more Elasticity

Page 12: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Experimental Setup

Compare the force at a point applied by our prototype to that applied by a circumferential belt.

Page 13: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Calibrating the Sensor

V

Piezo-Resistive Sensor Schematic

Page 14: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Test Protocol Mount sensor

Apply compression device

Sample force measurements

Page 15: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Test Results

Test Applied Force (N)

Rib Belt 609Rib Belt > 800Velcro Base Only

216

Velcro + Foam 316Velcro + Foam 342Velcro + Foam 483Velcro Base Only

471

Velcro + Foam 589Velcro + Foam > 800

Page 16: Group 6 Slides_Updated

Conclusions and Future Considerations

Achieved comparable force (800 N) at a point with both the rib belt and our prototype.

More realistic testing analogue.

Experiment with different materials and shapes for the Velcro attachment.

Page 17: Group 6 Slides_Updated
Page 18: Group 6 Slides_Updated