Greenville Central School District

Greenville Central School Greenville Central School DistrictDistrict

Student Achievement Student Achievement

in in

English Language ArtsEnglish Language Arts

Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development

Curriculum Curriculum MappingMapping

Data AnalysisData Analysis LiteracyLiteracy 2121stst Century Skills Century Skills

3-8 English Language Arts3-8 English Language Arts

Comparison of 2007-2008 Comparison of 2007-2008 Student Data to 2008-Student Data to 2008-20092009

– Performance Index- a value from Performance Index- a value from 0 to 200 that is assigned to an 0 to 200 that is assigned to an accountability group, indicating accountability group, indicating how that group performed on how that group performed on the required state assessment.the required state assessment.

– Effective Annual Measurable Effective Annual Measurable Objective- the Performance Objective- the Performance Index value that each Index value that each accountability group within a accountability group within a school or district is expected to school or district is expected to achieve to make Adequate achieve to make Adequate Yearly Progress.Yearly Progress.

2007-2008 2007-2008 ELAELA

PerformancPerformance Indexe Index

Effective Effective AMOAMO

All StudentsAll Students 169169 128128

WhiteWhite 169169 128128

Students Students with with DisabilitiesDisabilities

113113 123123

EconomicallEconomically y DisadvantagDisadvantageded

153153 125125

2008-2009 2008-2009 ELAELA





Students Students with with DisabilitiesDisabilities

134134 134134


166166 136136

Secondary English Language Secondary English Language ArtsArts

Comparison of 2007-Comparison of 2007-2008 Student Data to 2008 Student Data to 2008-20092008-2009

– AMO will be 200 by AMO will be 200 by 20142014

– Students improved in all Students improved in all areasareas

2007-2008 2007-2008 ELAELA





2008-2009 2008-2009 ELAELA






185185 155155

Grade 3 ELA 2005-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4

Levels

Per

cent

age

of S

tude

nts

Grade 3 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 3 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 3 ELA 2007-2008

Number of Students Tested2005-2006- 78

L1=9%; L2=16%; L3=67%; L4=8%2006-2007- 117

L1=12%; L2=24%; L3=58%; L4=6%2007-2008- 86

L1=2%; L2=22%; L3=67%; L4=8%

Grade 4 ELA 1998-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Perc

en

tag

e o

f S

tud

en

tsGrade 4 ELA 1998-1999

Grade 4 ELA 1999-2000

Grade 4 ELA 2000-2001

Grade 4 ELA 2001-2002

Grade 4 ELA 2002-2003

Grade 4 ELA 2003-2004

Grade 4 ELA 2004-2005

Grade 4 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 4 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 4 ELA 2007-2008


L1=4%; L2=40%; L3=47%; L4=9%1999-2000- 111

L1=7%; L2=32%; L3=45%; L4=15%

2000-2001- 124L1=10%; L2=45%; L3=36%;

L4=9%2001-2002- 107

L1=7%; L2=29%; L3=38%; L4=26%

2002-2003- 98L1=0%; L2=28%; L3=47%;

L4=26%2003-2004- 102

L1= 4%; L2=27%; L3=56%; L4=13%

2004-2005- 101L1=2%; L2=26%; L3=59%; L4=13

2005-2006- 95

ELA Grades Five and SixELA Grades Five and Six

Grade 5 ELA 2005-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 5 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 5 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 5 ELA 2007-2008


L1=2%; L2=28%; L3=66%; L4=4%2006-2007- 98

L1= 6%; L2=23%; L3=60%; L4=11%

2007-2008- 86L1=1%; L2=20%; L3=76%; L4=4%

Grade 6 ELA 2005-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 6 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 6 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 6 ELA 2007-2008


L1=1%; L2=32%; L3=62%; L4=5%2006-2007- 109

L1=6%; L2=39%; L3=48%; L4=7%2007-2008- 100

L1= 0%; L2=25%; L3=74%; L4=1%

ELA Grades Seven and Eight ELA Grades Seven and Eight

Grade 7 ELA 2005-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 7 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 7 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 7 ELA 2007-2008


L1= 2%; L2=35%; L3=56%; L4=7%

2006-2007- 114L1= 8%; L2=34%; L3=51%;

L4=7%

Grade 8 ELA 1998-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 8 ELA 1998-1999

Grade 8 ELA 1999-2000

Grade 8 ELA 2000-2001

Grade 8 ELA 2001-2002

Grade 8 ELA 2002-2003

Grade 8 ELA 2003-2004

Grade 8 ELA 2004-2005

Grade 8 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 8 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 8 ELA 2007-2008


L1= 2%; L2=39%; L3=48%; L4=11%

1999-2000- 120L1=5%; L2=39%; L3=39%;

L4=17%2000-2001- 120

L1= 3%; L2=37%; L3=36%; L4=25%

2001-2002- 96L1= 2%; L2=49%; L3=33%;

L4=16%2002-2003- 122

L1= 2%; L2=38%; L3=48%; L4=12%

2003-2004- 130L1= 3%; L2=42%; L3=41%;

L4=15% 2004-2005- 125

ELA Regents 1999-2008

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0-54 55-64 65-84 85-100

Scores

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Comprehensive ELA 1998-1999










Number of Students tested1998-1999- 80

54=16%; 64=15%; 84=49%; 100=20%1999-2000- 95

54=6%; 64=19%; 84=68%; 100=7%2000-2001- 98

54=7%; 64=10%; 84=57%; 100=26%2001-2002- 113

54=4%; 64=10%; 84=49%; 100=37%2002-2003- 85

54=7%; 64=12%; 84=39%; 100=42%2003-2004- 98

54=14%; 64=8%; 84=40%; 100=38%2004-2005- 136

64=13%; 64=21%; 84=43%; 100=23%2005-2006- 113

54=15%; 64=8%; 84=49%; 100=28%2006-2007- 113

54=4%; 64=11%; 84=52%; 100=33%2007-2008- 138

54=6%; 64=8%; 84=64%; 100=22%

Class of 2012 and 2013Class of 2012 and 2013

Class of 2012 ELA Analysis

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cent

age

of S

tude

nts

Grade 6 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 7 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 8 ELA 2007-2008


L1=6%; L2=39%; L3=48%; L4=7%2006-2007- 114

L1=2%; L2=35%; L3=56%; L4=7%2007-2008- 105

L1=4%; L2=48%; L3=46%; L4=3%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

Stu

de

nts

Grade 4 ELA 2004-2005

Grade 5 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 6 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 7 ELA 2007-2008


L1=2%; L2=26%; L3=59%; L4=13%

2005-2006- 105L1=5%; L2=23%; L3=51%;

L4=12%2006-2007- 109

L1=1%; L2=32%; L3=62%; L4=5%

2007-2008- 99L1=0%; L2=21%; L3=77%;

Class of 2014 and 2015Class of 2014 and 2015


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 4 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 5 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 6 ELA 2007-2008


L1=11%; L2=26%; L3=56%; L4=7%

2006-2007- 98L1=2%; L2=27%; L3=67%;

L4=4%2007-2008- 100

L1=0%; L2=25%; L3=74%; L4=1%


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 3 ELA 2005-2006

Grade 4 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 5 ELA 2007-2008


L1=12%; L2=24%; L3=58%; L4=6%

2006-2007- 84L1=6%; L2=23%; L3=61%;

L4=11%2007-2008- 86

L1=1%; L2=20%; L3=76%; L4=3%

Class of 2016Class of 2016Class of 2016 ELA Analysis

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Levels

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

Grade 3 ELA 2006-2007

Grade 4 ELA 2007-2008


L1=9%; L2=15%; L3=68%; L4=8%

2007-2008- 108L1=6%; L2=17%; L3=71%;

L4=6%

Structures that Support Structures that Support Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development

Quality Education Quality Education Committee (QEC)Committee (QEC)

Professional Professional Practices Practices Committee (PPC)Committee (PPC)

Building Level Building Level Team (BLT)Team (BLT)

Questar IIIQuestar III

K-12 LiteracyK-12 LiteracyProfessional DevelopmentProfessional Development

Curriculum and Curriculum and InstructionInstruction

Data AnalysisData Analysis 2121stst Century Skills Century Skills

Curriculum and InstructionCurriculum and Instruction

Instructional Program Instructional Program Initiative ProposalsInitiative Proposals

Sequence of Reading Sequence of Reading Skills (K-5)Skills (K-5)

Literacy in the Content Literacy in the Content Areas- Jack Costello Areas- Jack Costello from Questar IIIfrom Questar III

Literacy work with the Literacy work with the MentorsMentors

In-Service and In-Service and Conference Conference OpportunitiesOpportunities

Data AnalysisData Analysis

Using Student Test Using Student Test Data to Guide Data to Guide InstructionInstruction– Identify areas of Identify areas of

strength and strength and weakness for the weakness for the cohort groupcohort group

– Identify areas of Identify areas of strength and strength and weakness for weakness for individual studentsindividual students

2121stst Century Skills Century Skills

Rigor, Relevance Rigor, Relevance and Relationshipsand Relationships– In-Service In-Service

OpportunitiesOpportunities– Key Note Address- Key Note Address-

Ray McNulty from Ray McNulty from ICLEICLE

– Faculty SharingFaculty Sharing– Workshops with Workshops with

James Yap from James Yap from Ramapo CSDRamapo CSD

Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development

Curriculum Curriculum MappingMapping

Data AnalysisData Analysis LiteracyLiteracy 2121stst Century Skills Century Skills

Greenville Central School District

Documents

Transcript of Greenville Central School District