Green Supply Chain Management
-
Upload
satishmudiganti -
Category
Documents
-
view
4.488 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Green Supply Chain Management
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
1
MAKING THE SUPPLY CHAIN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE
Using GreenSCOR Model and Ba lanced Scorecard as too l s to implement susta inab i l i t y
TEAM:RAJESH MANTENA
SATISH MUDIGANTI
IEM 5813Performance Measurement System
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
2
Contents
What is Green Supply Chain Management?Green Supply Chain Benefits Introducing the SCOR modelWow Factor – Adding Environmental Performance
indicators to the supply chain model and identifying measures to use within a BSC for sustainability
Green perspective to the SCOR modelGreen SCOR - life cycle analysisBalance Scorecard Measures for SustainabilityGreen SCOR benefits and ChallengesReferencesQuestions
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
3
Green SCM leverages the role of the environment in SC value creation
Source: Forging New Links, GEMI, 2004
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
4
Benefits of a Green supply chain
Improves Agility – Green SCM help mitigate risks and speed innovations
Increases Adaptability- Green supply chain analysis often lead to innovative processes and continuous improvements.
Promotes Alignment – Green SCM involves negotiating policies with suppliers and customers, which results in better alignment of business processes and principles
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
5
Different environmental Pressures that lead to a Green SCM
Fig:1 Sources of environmental pressures effecting the supply chain
Regulations
• Directives• Taxes and Fees• Liability
Consumer & Ethical Responsibility
• Quality• Cost
Julie Paquette (2005), Engineering Systems Division, MIT
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
6
Environmental operational objectives framework
Resources Regulations Markets
Operate beyond pressure
Substitute Expand
Obviate the need for Exceed
Drive Create
Operate at pressure
Conserve Secure
Comply MeetSatisfy
Resist pressure
- BreachRelocate
Exit Ignore
En
viro
nm
en
tal
op
era
tin
g m
od
els
Environmental pressures
Gregory J., Atlee J., Isaacs J., Kirchain, R., “Sustainability metrics for materials use at the system and operational level,” Materials Systems Laboratory discussion paper, 2004
Supply Chain Council, Supply-Chain Operations Reference Model, SCOR Version 7.0, available at www.supply-chain.org, accessed May 28, 2005
Table: 1
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
7
Getting closer to the Wow Factor – [SCOR Model]
The SCOR (Supply chain operational reference) model
Fig: 2
Yildirim Yilmaz, “Performance measurement in the value chain: manufacturing v. tourism”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2006
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
8
How is Performance of a supply chain measured?
Performance Attributes developed by SCC Reliability
Responsiveness
Flexibility
Costs
Asset Management Efficiency
Delivering the correct product, to the current place, at correct time, in the correct quantity, with the correct documentation, to the correct customer.
The velocity at which a supply chain provides to the customer.
The agility of a supply chain in responding to marketplace changes to gain or maintain competitive advantage
The costs associated with operating the supply chain
The effectiveness of an organization in managing assets to support demand satisfaction. This includes the management of all assets: fixed and working capital.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
9
Metrics Used to Measure Performance Attributes of a Supply Chain
Performance Attribute Metrics
Reliability 1. Delivery Performance2. Fill Rates3. Perfect Order Fulfillment
Responsiveness 1. Order Fulfillment Lead Times
Flexibility 1. Supply Chain Response Time2. Production Flexibility
Costs 1. Costs of Goods Sold2. Total Supply Chain Management Costs3. Value-Added Productivity4. Warranty / Returns5. Processing Costs
Asset Management Efficiency 1. Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time2. Inventory Days of Supply3. Asset Turns
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
10
Wow Factor
Closing the Gap
by
Adding Environmental Performance indicators to the supply chain model and identifying measures to use within a BSC for sustainability
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
11
Green perspective to the SCOR model
PLAN Phase Plan to minimize energy consumption and hazardous
material usage Plan the handling and storage of hazardous materials Plan for the disposal of ordinary and hazardous waste Plan compliance of all supply chain activities
Processes used to aid environmental decision-making in this phase:
Environmental Cost Accounting Environmental life cycle analysis Design for environmentShapiro, K., Stoughton, M., Graff, R., Feng, L., “Health Hospitals: Environmental Improvements through Environmental Accounting,” A Report from Tellus Institute, July 2000, available at www.epa.gov/opptintr/acctg/pubs/hospitalreport.pdf, accessed June 1, 2005.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
12
Green perspective to the SCOR model (contd.)
SOURCE Phase Select suppliers with positive environmental records Select materials with environmentally friendly content Specify packaging requirements Specify delivery requirements to minimize
transportation and handling requirements
Processes used to aid environmental decision-making in this phase:
Environmental Auditing Environmental CertificationEnergy Star designates product specifications and eligibility criteria for several categories of products, summarized at www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=products.pr_es_home_office, accessed June 1, 2005.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
13
Green perspective to the SCOR model (contd.)
MAKE Phase Schedule production to minimize energy consumption Manage waste generated during the Make process Manage emissions (air and water) from the Make
process
Processes used to aid environmental decision-making in this phase:
Pollution prevention techniques like substitution, product modification, improved maintenance, and recycling.
Environmental management systems like guidance for employees in environmental health and safety procedures and facilitation of tools for continual improvement of environmental performance.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
14
Green perspective to the SCOR model (contd.)
DELIVER Phase Minimize use of packaging materials Schedule shipments to minimize fuel consumption
Processes used to aid environmental decision-making in this phase:
Green Logistics Approach: Considers the impact of procurement, transport, inventory control, and distribution activities to minimized environmental costs.
Matthews, H. Scott, Hendrickson, Chris T., “Economic and Environmental Implications of Online Retailing in the United States,” Joint OECD/ECMT Seminar on the Impact of E-commerce on Transport, Paris, June 6, 2001.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
15
Green perspective to the SCOR model (contd.)
RETURN Phase Schedule transportation and aggregate shipments to
minimize fuel consumption; prepare returns to prevent spills of hazardous materials (oils, fuels, etc.) from damaged products
Processes used to aid environmental decision-making in this phase:
Reverse Logistics Remanufacturing Recycling
Dale Rogers S., Ronald S. “Goin Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices,” Reverse Logistics Executive Council, 1999.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
16
Green SCOR - life cycle analysis
Julie Paquette (2005), Engineering Systems Division, MIT
17
Sample Green SCOR Process Table (Release Finished Product of a Pharmaceutical Company )Process Element: Released Finished Product to Deliver Process Element Number: M2.6
Activities associated with post-production documentation, testing, or certification required prior to delivery of finished product to customer. Examples include assembly of batch records for regulatory agencies, laboratory tests for potency or purity, creating certificate of analysis, and sign-off by the quality organization.
Performance Attributes MetricsReliability 1. % Release errors
Responsiveness 1. Quarantine or Hold time2. Release process cycle time
Flexibility None Identified
Cost 1. Release cost per unit
Assets None Identified
Best Practices FeaturesAccurate and low cost batch records forregulatory compliance
Electronic batch records
Review batch records by exception Electronic batch records linked to process plans/recipesand exceptions flagged
Automated notification of laboratoryregarding sample availability
Interface between production system and LIMS
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
2. % products meeting specified environmentalperformance requirements3. % of products with proper environmental labeling (ifrequired)
Implement EMS ProgramImplement hazardous materials “pharmacy” system
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
18
Balance Scorecard Measures for Sustainability
Financial Perspective
•$ fines/penalties•%proactive vs. reactive expenditures•Increase in relative % of proactive•Energy costs•Disposal costs•Recycling revenues
Customer Perspective
•$ cause related marketing•# green products•Product safety•Customer returns•% products reclaimed after use•Functional product eco-efficiency
Internal Business Perspective
•% materials recycled •%waste of landfill•%facilities certified•# certified suppliers•# accidents/spills•# truck miles
Learning & Growth Perspective
•% of employees trained•# employee complaints•# of employees with incentives linked to environmental goals•#of functions with environmental responsibilities•% of employees using car pools
19
Green SCOR Benefits and Challenges
Benefits Improved environmental management performance Improved supply chain management performance Improved green supply chain initiatives
Challenges Data Cultural Training
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
20
References
1. Beamon, B., "Designing the Green Supply Chain," Logistics Information Management, 12/4, (1999): 332-342
2. US Environmental Protection Agency, “Major Environmental Laws,” 2005, www.epa.gov/epahome/laws.htm, accessed May 30, 2005.
3. EU, “Directive on the Eco-Design of Energy Using Products,” europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/eco_design/, 2005, accessed June 1, 2005.
4. The Material Systems Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology has studied this area extensively. Researchers include Erica Fuchs, Michael Johnson, Francisco Veloso. US Food and Drug Administration, 2005, www.fda.gov/opacom/hpview.html, accessed June 1, 2005.
5. US Consumer Product Safety Commission, 2005, www.cpsc.gov/, accessed June 1, 2005.
6. EU, “Directive on the Restriction of Hazardous Substances,” 2003, europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_037/l_03720030213en00190023.pdf, accessed June 1, 2005.
7. Walls, Margaret, “The Role of Economics in Extended Producer Responsibility: Making Policy Choices and Setting Policy Goals,” Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 3/11, 2003, available at www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-DP-03-11.pdf, accessed May 28, 2005.
8. EU, “Directive on Packaging and Packaging Waste,” 1994, europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l21207.htm, accessed June 1, 2005.
More information about Germany’s “Green Dot” Dual System for recycling packaging waste may be found at www.gruener-punkt.de, accessed June 1, 2005.
9. Toffel, Michael, “The Growing Strategic Importance of End-of-Life Product Management,” California Management Review, 45/3, (2003): 102-129. Environmental Tax Policy Institute, www.vermontlaw.edu/elc/index.cfm?doc_id=134, accessed May 17, 2005.
10. Resources for the Future provides a sampling of references that address environmental taxes as an introduction to this subject area. www.rff.org
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
21
References (contd.)
1. Boyd, James, “Green Money in the Bank: Firm Responses to Environmental Financial Responsibility,” Magagerial and Decision Economics, 18/6 (1997): 491-506.
2. Snir, Eli, "Liability as a Catalyst for Product Stewardship." Production and Operations Management, 10/2, (2001): 190-207.
3. GreenTech Assets, Inc., greentechassets.com/, accessed May 31, 2005.
4. Ashland, Inc., www.ashchem.com/adc/enviro/, accessed May 31, 2005.
5. Boyer, Marcel and Porrini, Donatella, “The Choice of Instruments for Environmental Policy: Liability or Regulation?” An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Environmental Policy: Issues in Institutional Design, Research in Law and Economics, 20 (2002): 1-41.
6. Roberts, J.A., “Green consumers in the 1990s: profile and implications for advertising,” Journal of Business Research, 36/1, (1996): 217-231.
7. Mohr, Lois A., Eroglu, Dogan, Ellen, Pam E., “The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environmental claims in marketers communications,” The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32/1, (1998): 30-56, referenced in Hoffman, Andrew, “Business Decisions and the Environment: Significance, Challenges, and Momentum of an Emerging Research Field,” in G. Brewer and P. Stern (eds.) National Research Council, Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities, 2005.
8. Hansen, Nannette, “Organic food sales see health growth,” MSNBC News Online, December, 3, 2004, msnbc.msn.com/id/6638417/, accessed May 20, 2005.
Oklahoma State University - IEM 5813
22
Questions….
Questions ? ?
The more we exploit nature, The more our options are reduced, until we have only one: to fight for survival. ~ Morris K. Udal