Great Railing vinyl guardrail testing 2014

TEST REPORT

Rendered to:

HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC.

For:

PVC Guardrail System T-Rail, 3 in Contour and 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Profiles

Report No.: D3348.01-119-19 Report Date: 03/24/14 Test Record Retention Date: 02/06/18

Architectural Testing

130 Derry Court York, PA 17406-8405 phone: 717-764-7700 fax: 717-764-4129 www.archtest.com


TEST REPORT

D3348.01-119-19 March 24, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 General Information ............................................................................................................. 1

2.0 Referenced Standards........................................................................................................... 3

3.0 Component Flexural Tests ................................................................................................... 4

4.0 Assembly Fastener Testing .................................................................................................. 6

5.0 Guardrail End-Use Adjustments ........................................................................................ 16

6.0 Structural Performance Testing of Assembled Railing Systems ....................................... 18

7.0 Closing Statement .............................................................................................................. 91

Revision Log ................................................................................................................................. 92

Appendix A - Drawings

Appendix B - Photographs

Appendix C - Product Color Information Letter


130 Derry Court York, PA 17406-8405 phone: 717-764-7700 fax: 717-764-4129 www.archtest.com


TEST REPORT

Rendered to:

HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC. 3300 Pinson Valley Parkway

P.O. Box 170729 Birmingham, Alabama 35217-0729

Report No.: D3348.01-119-19 Test Dates: 12/11/13 Through: 02/06/14 Report Date: 03/24/14 Test Record Retention Date: 02/06/18

General Information 1.0

Product 1.1

PVC Guardrail System – T-Rail, 3 in Contour and 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Profiles

Project Description 1.2

Architectural Testing was contracted by Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. to perform structural testing on their T-Rail, 3 in Contour and 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular PVC guardrail (railing) systems. This report is in conjunction with Architectural Testing Report No. 53597.01-119-19 and 85730.02-119-19 which includes material test results for the White, Tan and Adobe colors; and C0270.01-119-19, which includes material test results for the Mocha Walnut color. This report is also in conjunction with Southwest Research Institute Report No. 01.10932.01.138b as well as Architectural Testing Report No. C0270.02-121-24 which both contain flame spread test results. The purpose of the testing is code compliance evaluation in accordance with the following criteria:

ICC-ES™ AC174 (approved January, 2012), Acceptance Criteria for Deck Board Span Ratings and Guardrail Systems (Guards and Handrails)

ICC-ES™ AC174-12 was developed by the ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. (ICC-ES™) as acceptance criteria to evaluate compliance with the following building codes:

2012 International Building Code®, International Code Council 2012 International Residential Code®, International Code Council


D3348.01-119-19 Page 2 of 92

Limitations 1.3

All tests performed were to evaluate structural performance of the railing assembly to carry and transfer imposed loads to the supports (posts). The test specimen evaluated included the balusters, rails, rail brackets and attachment to the supporting structure. The support posts were conventional construction and not within the scope of the evaluation. Posts were therefore not a tested component and were included in the test specimen only to facilitate anchorage of the rail brackets. Anchorage of support posts to the supporting structure is not included in the scope of this testing and would need to be evaluated separately.

Qualifications 1.4

Architectural Testing in York, Pennsylvania has demonstrated compliance with ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025 and is consequently accredited as a Testing Laboratory (TL-144) by International Accreditation Service, Inc. Architectural Testing is accredited to perform all testing reported herein.

Product Description 1.5

PVC T-Rail, 3 in Contour and 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular railing systems are comprised of PVC rails, balusters and post sleeves produced by an extrusion process. Extruded White, Tan, Adobe and Honey Maple products are co-extruded (capped) with a PVC capstock. Extruded Mocha Walnut products are co-extruded (capped) with an ASA acrylic capstock. The railing systems also included molded PVC and ASA rail brackets and aluminum rail reinforcement. Test specimens consisted of five different colored products identified by the manufacturer as follows: White, Tan, Adobe, Honey Maple and Mocha Walnut. Drawings are included in Appendix A to verify the overall dimensions and other pertinent information of the tested product, its components, and any constructed assemblies.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 3 of 92

Product Sampling 1.6

All railing material was marked MR 12-02-13 and MR 01-09-14 and initialed with permanent marker as an indication that they were selected by Mr. Matthew Roeling of RADCO (independent inspection agency). All test specimens were supplied by Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. and were marked as indicated. See photograph in Appendix B for typical sampling marks.

Witnessing 1.7

Mr. Jeff Havercroft of Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. and Mr. Mike Burkart of Waymark Products, LLC were both present from 12/16/13 through 12/20/13 to witness the following tests and test setups:

component flexural tests; assembly fastener tests; and structural performance testing of assembled railing systems.

Mr. Jeff Havercroft of Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. was also present from 1/13/14 through 1/16/13 to witness the following tests and test setups

structural performance testing of assembled railing systems

Conditions of Testing 1.8

Unless otherwise indicated, all testing reported herein was conducted in a laboratory set to maintain temperature in the range of 68 ± 4ºF and humidity in the range of 50 ± 5% RH. All test specimen materials were stored in the laboratory environment for no less than 40 hours prior to testing.

Referenced Standards 2.0

ASTM D 1761-06, Standard Test Methods for Mechanical Fasteners in Wood ASTM D 6109-05, Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastic Lumber ASTM D 7032-08, Standard Specification for Establishing Performance Ratings for Wood-Plastic Composite Deck Boards and Guardrail Systems (Guards or Handrails)


D3348.01-119-19 Page 4 of 92

Component Flexural Tests 3.0

Re: ICC-ES™ AC174, Section 6.3.1.1

General 3.1

Flexural tests were performed on railing components used in the railing assemblies for the purpose of establishing baseline values that can be used for comparison with future production in conjunction with Q.C. procedures. To suit these purposes, tests were performed using methods and in a manner that can be duplicated in the production setting. The test results are not suitable for use as design values or for any purpose other than that indicated.

Test Specimens 3.2

Each set consisted of at least ten test samples and was conditioned for a minimum of 40 hours at standard laboratory conditions prior to testing.

Test Procedure 3.3

Tests were performed using the methods described by ASTM D 6109. Testing was performed in a computer-monitored and -controlled SATEC Unidrive, Model MII 50 UD Universal Testing Machine with a third-point loading arrangement. The specimens were supported on 5/8 in radius support noses. The loading span was one-third of the bending span and used 5/8 in radius loading noses. Midspan deflection was measured with a 2-inch travel Instron Model 3540-200T-ST deflectometer. Shapes that were not symmetrical about their x-axis (horizontal) were tested in the same orientation as shown by the product drawing provided in Appendix A. Any exceptions are noted in the test results tables below. See photographs in Appendix B for test setup.

Test Results 3.4

Stiffness properties were derived from load/deflection data recorded during the loading process using the mid span deflection and a least square fit between 10% and 40% of the maximum test load. Peak load and Mu were defined at ultimate bending strength. Reported peak loads were not limited by an outer surface strain of 0.03 in/in as referenced in Section 10.1.7 of ASTM D 6109.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 5 of 92

Test Results (Continued) 3.4

PVC 3 in Contour Top Rail 1

Support Span = 36 in Crosshead Speed = 0.600 in/min

Test Date: 12/27/13

Sample No.

Sample Color

Weight Per Lineal Foot

(lb)

Ultimate Load (lb)

Slope (lbf/in)

Mu (in·lb)

El (lb·in2)

1 Mocha Walnut 0.75 630 1047 3780 866600 2 White 0.76 718 1102 4308 912200 3 Honey Maple 0.77 712 1128 4272 933700 4 Adobe

0.82 922 1131 5532 936700 5 0.81 923 1048 5538 867500 6 Honey Maple 0.77 706 1126 4236 932600 7 Mocha Walnut 0.74 578 1051 3468 870400 8

Tan 0.75 677 1081 4062 894900

9 0.76 708 1106 4248 915400 10 White 0.76 724 1096 4344 907800

Minimum: 3468 866600 Maximum: 5538 936700

Average: 4379 903800 Standard Deviation: 668 27740

Coefficient of Variation: 15% 3% 1 Tested in an inverted orientation with wood-bearing blocks beneath specimen and above steel rod supports.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 6 of 92

Assembly Fastener Testing 4.0

Re: ICC-ES™ AC174, Section 5.2

General 4.1

The purpose of this testing was to simulate a 90º bracket loading condition for the in-line application, which addresses a situation when the guardrail system is to be installed with the top rails in a corner condition.

Test Specimens 4.2

Short sections of the top rail were attached in accordance with Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc.'s installation instructions to short sections of posts. Specimens were assembled by an Architectural Testing technician. The rail brackets were attached to PVC-sleeved treated 4x4 wood posts (Southern Pine). Brackets were secured to the post and to the rail as described in Section 6.4 Fastening Schedule.

Test Setup 4.3

The testing machine was fitted with the post sections at the top and bottom to accommodate anchorage of the rail and brackets. The top post section was attached to the test machine’s crosshead with a swivel mechanism, and the bottom post section was attached rigidly to the base of the test machine. Reference photographs in Appendix B for test setups.

Test Procedure 4.4

Testing was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1761 and by using a computer-monitored and -controlled Instron Model 3369 Universal Testing Machine. Tests were run at a crosshead speed of 0.05 in/min, and each specimen was tested in tension to its ultimate load capacity.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 7 of 92

4.5 Test Results

3 in Contour Top Rail

3 in Contour Top Rail with ASA Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/11/13

Specimen No. Ultimate

Load (lb)

Deviation From Average Mode of Failure

1 660 +1.7% Bracket Deformation 2 694 +6.9%

3 594 -8.5% Average 649

Allowable Capacity 1 216 ≥ 200 lb ∴OK 2 1 Average ultimate load divided by a factor of safety of three (3.0) 2 Acceptance criteria determined from the uniform load test: 50 plf x 96 in ÷ 12 in ÷ 2 brackets = 200 lb

3 in Contour Top Rail with ASA Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/11/13


Load (lb)


1 552 -8.6% Bracket Deformation 2 664 +9.9%

3 596 -1.3% Average 604


3 in Contour Top Rail with ASA Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/11/13


Load (lb)


1 662 +5.1% Screw Hole Deformation 2 532 -15.6%

3 698 +10.8% Average 630



D3348.01-119-19 Page 8 of 92

4.5 Test Results (Continued)

3 in Contour Top Rail (Continued)

3 in Contour Top Rail with PVC Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/11/13


Load (lb)


1 768 +7.9% Bracket Fractured 2 750 +5.3%

3 619 -13.1% Average 712


3 in Contour Top Rail with PVC Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/11/13


Load (lb)


1 743 +4.8% Bracket Fractured 2 724 +2.1%

3 661 -6.8% Average 709


3 in Contour Top Rail with PVC Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 02/06/14


Load (lb)


1 522 -21.7% Bracket Fractured 2 716 +7.3%

Screw Hole Deformation 3 762 +14.2%

Average 667 Allowable Capacity 1 222 ≥ 200 lb ∴OK 2

1 Average ultimate load divided by a factor of safety of three (3.0) 2 Acceptance criteria determined from the uniform load test: 50 plf x 96 in ÷ 12 in ÷ 2 brackets = 200 lb


D3348.01-119-19 Page 9 of 92


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail

2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with ASA Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/13/13


Load (lb)


1 801 +4.6% Bracket Deformation 2 748 -2.3%

3 749 -2.2% Average 766


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with ASA Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/13/13


Load (lb)


1 869 +7.0% Bracket Fractured 2 860 +5.9% 3 707 -12.9% Bracket Deformation



2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with ASA Brackets and"P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/13/13


Load (lb)


1 748 -1.6% Bracket Fractured 2 780 +2.6% Bracket Deformation 3 751 -1.2%




D3348.01-119-19 Page 10 of 92


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail (Continued)

2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with PVC Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/12/13


Load (lb)



3 833 +19.7% Average 696


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with PVC Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/12/13


Load (lb)



3 726 -9.6% Average 803


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with PVC Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/13/13


Load (lb)



3 709 -3.4% Average 734



D3348.01-119-19 Page 11 of 92



2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with ASA Deckover Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/12/13


Load (lb)



3 812 +1.4% Average 801


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with ASA Deckover Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/12/13


Load (lb)



3 651 -12.4% Average 743


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with ASA Deckover Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/12/13


Load (lb)


1 794 +0.5% Bracket Deformation 2 777 -1.6%

3 799 +1.1% Average 790



D3348.01-119-19 Page 12 of 92



2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with PVC Deckover Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/11/13


Load (lb)



3 727 +1.0% Average 720


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with PVC Deckover Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/11/13


Load (lb)



3 736 -1.3% Average 746


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Top Rail with PVC Deckover Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

Test Date: 12/12/13


Load (lb)



3 767 -1.9% Average 782



D3348.01-119-19 Page 13 of 92


T-Rail Top Rail

T-Rail Top Rail with ASA Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/16/13


Load (lb)


1 793 +2.3% Bracket Fractured 2 723 -6.7%

3 809 +4.4% Average 775


T-Rail Top Rail with ASA Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/16/13


Load (lb)


1 797 +9.2% Bracket Fractured 2 670 -8.2%

3 724 -0.8% Average 730


T-Rail Top Rail with ASA Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/16/13


Load (lb)


1 710 -9.3% Bracket Fractured 2 831 +6.1%

3 808 +3.2% Average 783



D3348.01-119-19 Page 14 of 92


T-Rail Top Rail (Continued)

T-Rail Top Rail with PVC Brackets and "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/13/13


Load (lb)



3 844 +5.4% Average 801


T-Rail Top Rail with PVC Brackets and Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/13/13


Load (lb)



3 786 +2.6% Average 766


T-Rail Top Rail with PVC Brackets and "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement Test Date: 12/16/13


Load (lb)


1 821 -1.4% Bracket Deformation 2 780 -6.4%

3 899 +7.9% Average 833



D3348.01-119-19 Page 15 of 92

Summary and Conclusions 4.5

Assembly Fastener Test Summary

Rail Type

Bracket Material

Reinforcement Profile

Average Ultimate

Load (lb)

Allowable Capacity

(lb)

3 in Contour

ASA "H" 649 216

Inverted "h" 604 201 "P" 630 210

PVC "H" 712 237

Inverted "h" 709 236 "P" 667 222

2 in by

3-1/2 in Rectangular

ASA "H" 766 255

Inverted "h" 812 271 "P" 760 253

PVC "H" 696 232

Inverted "h" 803 268 "P" 734 245

ASA Deckover "H" 801 267

Inverted "h" 743 248 "P" 790 263

PVC Deckover "H" 720 240

Inverted "h" 746 249 "P" 782 261

T-Rail

ASA "H" 775 258

Inverted "h" 730 243 "P" 783 261

PVC "H" 801 267

Inverted "h" 766 255 "P" 833 278

The maximum design load rating required for guardrail systems for use in IRC – One- and Two-Family Dwellings and for rail lengths up to and including 8 ft for use in IBC – All Use Groups is 200 lb. Therefore, all fasteners / connectors reported herein meet the performance requirements of ICC-ES™ AC174 for use in corner conditions.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 16 of 92

Guardrail End-Use Adjustments 5.0

Re: ICC-ES™ AC174, Sections 3.6 - 3.8

General 5.1

Data from material testing reported in Architectural Testing Report No.'s 53597.01-119-19 and 85730.02-119-19 for the White, Tan and Adobe colored products and C0270.01-119-19 for the Mocha Walnut colored products was used for determination of applicable adjustment factors.

End-Use Adjustment Factors 5.2

PVC Material – White, Tan, and Adobe Colors

End-Use Factors

Comparison (% Change) with Standard (Control)

Conditions ASTM D 7032 Criteria (as referenced by AC174)

Adjustment Factors

Strength 1 Stiffness 2 Strength Stiffness UV

85730.02 +5.2% -3.2% Loss within 10% 1.00 1.00 53597.01 +8.5% -2.7% Freeze-Thaw 4 +2.7% +10.2% Loss within 10% 1.00 1.00

Greatest of:

Loss within 25% 1.00 1.00 +125ºF 4 -21.7% -18.9%

-20ºF 4 +33.0% +16.2% Moisture 3,4 N/A N/A

Overall End-Use Adjustment Factor: 1.00 1.00 1 Moment or MOR (Modulus of Rupture) 2 EI (the product of MOE and the Moment of Inertia) or MOE (Modulus of Elasticity) 3 Product does not absorb moisture. 4 Reference Architectural Testing Report No. 53597.01-119-19 for test results.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 17 of 92

5.2 End Use Adjustment Factors (Continued)

PVC Substrate Material with Acrylic Cap – Mocha Walnut Color

End-Use Factors

Comparison (% Change) with Standard (Control)

Conditions ASTM D 7032 Criteria (as referenced by AC174)

Adjustment Factors

Strength 1 Stiffness 2 Strength Stiffness

UV +25.5% +19.5% Loss within 10% 1.00 1.00

Freeze-Thaw -2.2% -3.4% Loss within 10% 1.00 1.00

Greatest of:

Loss within 25% 1.00 1.00 +125ºF -16.9% -21.6%

-20ºF +54.1% +11.2% Moisture 3 N/A N/A

Overall End-Use Adjustment Factor: 1.00 1.00 1 Moment or MOR (Modulus of Rupture) 2 EI (the product of MOE and the Moment of Inertia) or MOE (Modulus of Elasticity) 3 Product does not absorb moisture.

Pursuant to compliance with ICC-ES™ AC174, the test loads were increased by the amount in excess of 10% for UV exposure and freeze-thaw cycling, as well as 25% for temperature and moisture effect. This sets the overall end-use adjustment factor at 1.00. Therefore, tests are performed to a maximum test load equal to 2.50 times design load (2.5 ÷ 1.00 = 2.50). In addition, the deflection observed at design load is adjusted for the cumulative effect on stiffness properties in excess of the same tolerances specified for strength (1.00). Material testing of the Honey Maple product color was not conducted. Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. has submitted information to Architectural Testing Inc. to show that the color is similar to the Tan color previously evaluated in Architectural Testing Report No. 85730.02-119-19. Reference product color information letter from Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. in Appendix C for additional information.

Stiffness Analysis 5.3

For rails reinforced with aluminum, adjustment factors are typically further evaluated for their effect on the combined PVC/aluminum component by applying the strength or stiffness loss only to the percentage carried by the PVC, which was normally determined by relative stiffness analysis. Since the overall end-use adjustment factors were unaffected by material testing (remain at 1.00) a stiffness analysis was not required.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 18 of 92

Structural Performance Testing of Assembled Railing Systems 6.0

Re: ICC-ES™ AC174, Section 5.1

General 6.1

Railing assemblies were tested in a self-contained structural frame designed to accommodate anchorage of a rail assembly and application of the required test loads. The specimen was loaded using an electric winch mounted to a rigid steel test frame. High strength steel cables, nylon straps, and load distribution beams were used to impose test loads on the specimen. Applied load was measured using an electronic load cell located in-line with the loading system. Deflections were measured to the nearest 0.01 in using electronic linear displacement transducers.

Railing Assembly Description 6.2

The PVC "T" Rail, 3 in Contour, and 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular guardrail systems consisted of extruded PVC top and bottom rails with spaced balusters between the rail members. Reference Section 6.8. Summary and Conclusions for overall rail length and height dimensions for the various railing systems reported herein. Top and bottom rails attached to treated 4x4 wood posts (Southern Pine) sleeved by 4 in by 4 in PVC post covers via molded PVC and ASA socket brackets. See Section 6.4 Fastening Schedule for connection details. A support block was located at the midspan of the bottom rail and was attached according to Section 6.4 Fastening Schedule. See drawings in Appendix A and photographs in Appendix B for additional details.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 19 of 92

Component Descriptions 6.3 The scope of testing performed and reported herein was intended to evaluate the PVC "T" Rail, 3 in Contour and 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular railing system consisting of the following components (see Appendix A for drawings):

Top Rail – "T"-Rail – 3-1/2 in wide by 3-1/2 in high co-extruded PVC rail profile

(aluminum reinforced) (0.090" wall)

– Contour – 3 in wide by 3-9/16 in high co-extruded PVC contoured rail profile (aluminum reinforced) (0..090" wall)

– Rectangular – 2 in wide by 3-1/2 in high co-extruded PVC rectangular rail profile (aluminum reinforced) (0.095" wall)

Bottom Rail – 2 in wide by 3-1/2 in high co-extruded PVC rectangular rail profile (0.095" wall)

Aluminum Reinforcing Inserts – All inserts were used in top rails only. Reference Drawings in Appendix A for reinforcement orientation. Reference Section 6.8 Summary and Conclusions for details describing which reinforcing members were used in each assembly.

– 1-3/4 in by 3-1/8 in high (0.070 in wall) extruded 6063-T6 aluminum "P" insert, full length of rail

– 1-3/4 in by 3-1/8 in high (0.050 in web wall thickness, 0.055 in flange wall thickness) extruded 6005A-T61 aluminum "H" insert, full length of rail

– 1-3/4 in by 3-1/8 in high (0.060 in wall) extruded 6005A-T61 aluminum inverted "h" insert, full length of rail

Balusters – 1-1/2 in square, hollow, co-extruded PVC pickets (0.060 in wall)

Support Block – 1-1/2 in square hollow, co-extruded PVC picket (0.060 in wall) cut to length and fastened to the center of the underside of the bottom rail as described in Section 6.4 Fastening Schedule.

Rail Connection Condition – All brackets were from Waymark Products' Summit product line. Connection details can be found in Section 6.4 Fastening Schedule

– T-Rail: Summit PVC and ASA socket brackets

– 3 in Contour Rail: Summit PVC and ASA socket brackets

– 2 in x 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail: - Summit PVC and ASA socket brackets (Rectangular and Deckover) *Note: All White, Tan, Honey Maple and Adobe brackets were PVC and Mocha Walnut

brackets were ASA

Post Sleeves – 4 in square, hollow, co-extruded PVC sleeve (0.110" wall), installed over 4x4 wood posts

Support Post – Preservative-treated wood (Southern Pine)


D3348.01-119-19 Page 20 of 92

Fastening Schedule 6.4

Connection Fastener Top / Bottom Rail Bracket

to Post Six #8-8 x 1-1/2" (0.108 in minor diameter) pan-head,

square-drive, stainless steel, self-starting screws Rail Bracket to Rail Two #10 x 3/4" pan-head, square-drive, self-staring screws

Baluster Top and Bottom Rails Slip fit – No mechanical connection Crush Block to Bottom Rail No mechanical connection

Test Setup 6.5

The railing assembly was installed and tested as a single level railing section by directly securing the 4 in square PVC-sleeved 4x4 treated wood posts (Southern Pine) to a rigid test frame, which rigidly restrained the rail system. The 4 in square composite-sleeved 4x4 treated wood posts were included only to facilitate anchorage of the test specimen and were not tested components. Test specimens used both PVC and ASA brackets. Some assemblies utilized PVC brackets at one side of the assembly, and ASA brackets at the other. Some assemblies one bracket type only. A sufficient number of tests were performed to allow for each bracket material to be used in three specimens of each rail system under each loading case (IBC and IRC). Transducers mounted to an independent reference frame were located to record movement of reference points on the railing system components (ends and mid-point) to determine net component deflections. See photographs in Appendix B for test setups.

Test Procedure 6.6 Testing and evaluation was performed in accordance with Section 5.1 of ICC-ES™ AC174. The test specimen was inspected prior to testing to verify size and general condition of the materials, assembly, and installation. No potentially compromising defects were observed. One specimen was used for all load tests which were performed in the order reported. Each design load test was performed using the following procedure:

1. Zeroed transducers and load cell at zero load; and 2. Increased load to specified test load in no less than ten seconds.

Test Results 6.7

Unless otherwise noted, all loads and displacement measurements were normal to the rail (horizontal). The test results apply only to the railing assembly between supports and anchorage to the support. The test load adjustment factor remained at 2.5 x design load. This was determined from test results as summarized in Section 5.0 Guardrail End-Use Adjustments.

Key to Test Results Tables:

Load Level: Target test load Test Load: Actual applied load at the designated load level (target). Elapsed Time (E.T.): The amount of time into the test with zero established at the beginning of the loading procedure.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 21 of 92


T-Rail Level Guardrail Systems

Test Series No. 1 120 in by 42 in PVC T-Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IRC – One-and-Two Family Dwellings / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3

Test No. 1 – Test Date: 12/16/13 Design Load: 50 lb / 1 Square ft of Infill at Center of Two Pickets

Load Level Test Load (lb) E.T. (min:sec) Result

125 lb (2.50 x D.L.) 125 00:25 Withstood load equal to or greater than 125 lb without failure

Test No. 2 – Test Date: 12/16/13 Design Load: 50 lb / 1 Square ft of Infill at Bottom of Two Pickets



Test No. 3 – Test Date: 12/16/13 Design Load: 200 lb Concentrated Load at Midspan of Top Rail

Load Level Test Load (lb) E.T. (min:sec) Displacement (inches) End Mid End Net 1

200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:43 0.10 2.94 0.06 2.86

500 lb (2.50 x D.L.) 501 01:36 Result: Withstood load equal to or greater than 500 lb without failure

Deflection Evaluation: Maximum rail deflection at 200 lb = 2.86 in on a 120 in rail

Limits per AC174 2: oklh∴>=

+=

+ "86.2"00.3

96120

2442

9624

1 Each end displacement was measured at the center of the support. Net displacement was the rail displacement relative to the supports.

2 Deflection limit calculation based on 42" railing height; Maximum rail deflection at 200 lb does not satisfy the limits per AC174 for a 36 in railing height (2.75 in maximum) used in an IRC - One- and Two-Family Dwelling application.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 22 of 92


T-Rail Level Guardrail Systems (Continued)

Test Series No. 1 (Continued)

Specimen No. 1 of 3 (Continued)

Test No. 4 – Test Date: 12/16/13 Design Load: 200 lb Concentrated Load at Both Ends of Top Rail (Brackets)

Load Level 1 Test Load (lb) E.T. (min:sec) Result

1000 lb (2.50 x D.L.) x 2 1004 01:10 Each end withstood load equal to or

greater than 500 lb without failure

1 Load was imposed on both ends of rail using a spreader beam; therefore, loads were doubled


D3348.01-119-19 Page 23 of 92




Specimen No. 2 of 3 Test No. 1 – Test Date: 12/16/13

Design Load: 50 lb / 1 Square ft of Infill at Center of Two Pickets Load Level Test Load (lb) E.T. (min:sec) Result







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:50 0.07 3.06 0.10 2.98




+=

+ "98.2"00.3

96120

2442

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 24 of 92









1 Load was imposed on both ends of rail using a spreader beam; therefore, loads were doubled.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 25 of 92












200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:27 0.08 2.99 0.06 2.92




+=

+ "92.2"00.3

96120

2442

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 26 of 92




Specimen No. 3 of 3 (Continued) Test No. 4 – Test Date: 12/16/13

Design Load: 200 lb Concentrated Load at Both Ends of Top Rail (Brackets)






D3348.01-119-19 Page 27 of 92



Test Series No. 2A 96 in by 42 in PVC T-Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 1







Test No. 3 – Test Date: 12/18/13 Design Load: 50 plf x (96 in ÷ 12 in/ft) = 400 lb Horizontal Uniform Load on Top Rail 1



1 Uniform load was simulated with quarter point loading.

Test No. 4 – Test Date: 12/18/13 Design Load: 50 plf x (96 in ÷ 12 in/ft) = 400 lb Vertical Uniform Load on Top Rail 1



1 Uniform load was simulated with four equal point loads.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 28 of 92



Test Series No. 2A (Continued) Specimen No. 1 of 1 (Continued)

Test No. 5 – Test Date: 12/18/13

Design Load: 200 lb Concentrated Load at Midspan of Top Rail


200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:29 0.07 1.61 0.03 1.56




+=

+ "56.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624


2 Deflection limit calculation based on worst case 36" railing height to satisfy One- and Two-Family Dwelling requirements.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 29 of 92



Test Series No. 2A (Continued)








D3348.01-119-19 Page 30 of 92



Test Series No. 2B 96 in by 42 in PVC T-Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

and PVC Brackets IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 2












D3348.01-119-19 Page 31 of 92



Test Series No. 2B (Continued)








200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:28 0.05 1.60 0.06 1.55




+=

+ "55.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 32 of 92



















D3348.01-119-19 Page 33 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:30 0.05 1.42 0.04 1.38




+=

+ "38.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624


2 Deflection limit calculation based on worse case 36" railing height to satisfy One- and Two-Family Dwelling requirements.







D3348.01-119-19 Page 34 of 92



Test Series No. 2C 96 in by 42 in PVC T-Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement

and ASA Brackets IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 2
















D3348.01-119-19 Page 35 of 92



Test Series No. 2C (Continued)




200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:28 0.06 1.22 0.07 1.16




+=

+ "16.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624










D3348.01-119-19 Page 36 of 92



















D3348.01-119-19 Page 37 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:28 0.04 1.25 0.05 1.21




+=

+ "21.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 38 of 92



Test Series No. 3 96 in by 42 in PVC T-Rail Level Guardrail with "H" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement,

using PVC and ASA Brackets IRC – One-and-Two Family Dwellings / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:20 0.09 1.01 0.07 0.93




+=

+ "93.0"50.2

9696

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 39 of 92



Test Series No. 3 Specimen No. 1 of 3







D3348.01-119-19 Page 40 of 92




Specimen No. 2 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:24 0.04 0.99 0.04 0.95




+=

+ "95.0"50.2

9696

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 41 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 42 of 92




Specimen No. 3 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:22 0.10 0.96 0.04 0.89




+=

+ "89.0"50.2

9696

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 43 of 92




Specimen No. 3 of 3







D3348.01-119-19 Page 44 of 92



Test Series No. 4 72 in by 42 in PVC T-Rail Level Guardrail with Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum

Reinforcement using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IRC – One-and-Two Family Dwellings / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:22 0.07 0.51 0.08 0.44




+=

+ "44.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 45 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 46 of 92



Test Series No. 4 (Continued) Specimen No. 2 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:25 0.08 0.63 0.12 0.53




+=

+ "53.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 47 of 92



Test Series No. 4 (Continued) Specimen No. 2 of 3 (Continued)








D3348.01-119-19 Page 48 of 92




Specimen No. 3 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:25 0.10 0.62 0.09 0.53




+=

+ "53.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 49 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 50 of 92


Rectangular Level Guardrail Systems

Test Series No. 5A 96 in by 42 in PVC 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped

Aluminum Reinforcement using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 1












D3348.01-119-19 Page 51 of 92


Rectangular Level Guardrail Systems (Continued)

Test Series No. 5A Specimen No. 1 of 1 (Continued) Test No. 4 – Test Date: 12/17/13

Design Load: 50 plf x (96 in ÷ 12 in/ft) = 400 lb Vertical Uniform Load on Top Rail 1






200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:30 0.05 1.68 0.03 1.64




+=

+ "64.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 52 of 92



Test Series No. 5B 96 in by 42 in PVC 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped

Aluminum Reinforcement and ASA Brackets at Both Ends IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 2





Design Load: 50 lb / 1 Square ft of Infill at Bottom of Two Pickets Load Level Test Load (lb) E.T. (min:sec) Result



Design Load: 50 plf x (96 in ÷ 12 in/ft) = 400 lb Horizontal Uniform Load on Top Rail 1









D3348.01-119-19 Page 53 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:33 0.04 1.71 0.04 1.67




+=

+ "67.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624










D3348.01-119-19 Page 54 of 92



















D3348.01-119-19 Page 55 of 92






200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:29 0.05 1.71 0.05 1.66




+=

+ "66.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 56 of 92


Test Series No. 5C 96 in by 42 in PVC 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped

Aluminum Reinforcement and PVC Brackets at Both Ends IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 2







Test No. 3 – Test Date: 12/17/13 Design Load: 50 plf x (96 in ÷ 12 in/ft) = 400 lb Horizontal Uniform Load on Top Rail 1 Load Level Test Load (lb) E.T. (min:sec) Result








D3348.01-119-19 Page 57 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:29 0.05 1.75 0.03 1.71




+=

+ "71.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 58 of 92




Specimen No. 2 of 2
















D3348.01-119-19 Page 59 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:27 0.09 1.73 0.04 1.67




+=

+ "67.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 60 of 92



Test Series No. 6 72 in by 42 in PVC 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Level Guardrail with Inverted

"h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IRC – One-and-Two Family Dwellings / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:32 0.07 0.68 0.07 0.61



Limits per AC174: oklh∴>=

+=

+ "61.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 61 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 62 of 92




Specimen No. 2 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 202 00:23 0.07 0.76 0.06 0.70




+=

+ "70.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624


2 Deflection limit calculation based on worse case 36" railing height to satisfy One- and Two-Family Dwelling requirements.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 63 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 64 of 92












200 lb (D.L.) 202 00:21 0.10 0.73 0.11 0.63




+=

+ "63.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 65 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 66 of 92


Rectangular Level Guardrail Systems with Deckover Brackets

Test Series No. 7 96 in by 42 in PVC 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement using PVC Deckover Brackets and ASA Deckover Brackets

IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174
















D3348.01-119-19 Page 67 of 92


Rectangular Level Guardrail Systems with Deckover Brackets (Continued)





200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:25 0.09 1.64 0.04 1.58




+=

+ "58.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624










D3348.01-119-19 Page 68 of 92



















D3348.01-119-19 Page 69 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:37 0.06 1.84 0.06 1.78




+=

+ "78.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 70 of 92



















D3348.01-119-19 Page 71 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:48 0.05 1.82 0.02 1.79




+=

+ "79.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 72 of 92



Test Series No. 8 72 in by 42 in PVC 2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular Rail Level Guardrail with Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum Reinforcement using PVC Deckover Brackets and ASA Deckover

Brackets IRC – One-and-Two Family Dwellings / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:22 0.09 0.68 0.06 0.61




+=

+ "61.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 73 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 74 of 92




Specimen No. 2 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:30 0.12 0.71 0.08 0.61




+=

+ "61.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 75 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 76 of 92












200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:24 0.11 0.71 0.08 0.62




+=

+ "62.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 77 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 78 of 92


3" Contour Level Guardrail Systems

Test Series No. 9 96 in by 42 in PVC 3 in Contour Level Guardrail with "P" Shaped Aluminum

Reinforcement using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IBC – All Use Groups / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3
















D3348.01-119-19 Page 79 of 92


3" Contour Level Guardrail Systems (Continued)





200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:30 0.06 1.77 0.02 1.73




+=

+ "73.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 80 of 92



















D3348.01-119-19 Page 81 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:31 0.06 1.85 0.01 1.82




+=

+ "82.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 82 of 92




Specimen No. 3 of 3
















D3348.01-119-19 Page 83 of 92







200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:31 0.05 1.82 0.03 1.78




+=

+ "78.1"50.2

9696

2436

9624









D3348.01-119-19 Page 84 of 92



Test Series No. 10 72 in by 42 in PVC 3 in Contour Level Guardrail with Inverted "h" Shaped Aluminum

Reinforcement using PVC Brackets and ASA Brackets IRC – One-and-Two Family Dwellings / ICC-ES AC174

Specimen No. 1 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 201 00:26 0.08 0.96 0.09 0.86




+=

+ "86.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 85 of 92










D3348.01-119-19 Page 86 of 92




Specimen No. 2 of 3









200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:27 0.09 0.87 0.07 0.79




+=

+ "79.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 87 of 92










D3348.01-119-19 Page 88 of 92












200 lb (D.L.) 200 00:33 0.08 0.86 0.09 0.78




+=

+ "78.0"25.2

9672

2436

9624




D3348.01-119-19 Page 89 of 92











D3348.01-119-19 Page 90 of 92

Summary and Conclusions 6.8

The railing assemblies reported herein meet the structural performance requirements of Section 5.1 of ICC-ES™ AC174 as installed between adequate supports with guardrail details and Occupancy Classification as shown in the following table:

Top Rail

Rail Length 1

and Height 2

Bracket Material Top Rail

Reinforcing

Code Occupancy

Classification ASA PVC

T-Rail

120-1/2 in by 40 in X X "P" IRC – One and

Two-Family Dwellings

96 in by 40 in

X X "P" IBC – All Use Groups

X X "H" IRC – One and


72 in by 40 in X X Inverted "h" IRC – One and


2 in by 3-1/2 in Rectangular

96 in by 40 in X 3 X 3 "P" IBC – All Use Groups

72 in by 40 in X 3 X 3 Inverted "h" IRC – One and Two-Family

3 in Contour

96 in by 40 in X X "P" IBC – All Use Groups

72-1/4 in by 40 in X X Inverted "h" IRC – One and Two-Family

1 Overall top rail length (inside of post to inside of post) 2 Overall rail height (bottom of bottom rail to top of top rail) 3 Includes both rectangular bracket and “Deckover” bracket styles All rail systems tested were a Level / In-Line configuration and used 1-1/2 in square, hollow, co-extruded PVC pickets. The railing supports were not included within the scope of this testing, and these conclusions would apply only for a railing that is provided with adequate supports that provide equal or better substrate material (Southern Pine wood) for the fasteners used to anchor the rail brackets. Anchorage of support posts to the supporting structure is not included in the scope of this testing and would need to be evaluated separately.


D3348.01-119-19 Page 91 of 92

Closing Statement 7.0

Architectural Testing will service this report for the entire test record retention period. Test records that are retained such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of test specimens, or other pertinent project documentation will be retained by Architectural Testing, Inc. for the entire test record retention period. Results obtained are tested values and were secured using the designated test methods. This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. It is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and relates only to the specimens tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Architectural Testing, Inc. For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, INC.: __________________________________ _________________________________ Adam J. Schrum V. Thomas Mickley, Jr., P.E. Technician I Senior Project Engineer Structural Systems Testing Structural Systems Testing AJS:ecr/vtm/jas Attachments (pages): This report is complete only when all attachments listed are included.

Appendix A - Drawings (4) Appendix B - Photographs (6) Appendix C - Product Color Information Letter (1)


D3348.01-119-19 Page 92 of 92

Revision Log

Rev. # Date Page(s) Revision(s)

0 03/24/14 N/A Original report issue

This report produced from controlled document template ATI 00412, Revised 04/27/12.


D3348.01-119-19

APPENDIX A

Drawings


D3348.01-119-19

APPENDIX B

Photographs


D3348.01-119-19

Photo No. 1 Typical Sample Marking (12/02/13 Sampling)

Photo No. 2 Typical Sample Marking (01/09/14 Sampling)


D3348.01-119-19

Photo No. 3 ASTM D 6109 Component Flexural Test Setup (Standard Conditions)

Photo No. 4 Assembly Fastener Test Setup (In-Line Application)


D3348.01-119-19

Photo No. 5 Infill Loading at Center of Two Balusters

Photo No. 6 Infill Loading at Bottom of Two Balusters


D3348.01-119-19

Photo No. 7 Horizontal Uniform Load on Top Rail

Photo No. 8 Vertical Uniform Load on Top Rail


D3348.01-119-19

Photo No. 9 Concentrated Load at Midspan of Top Rail

Photo No. 10 Concentrated Load at Both Ends of Top Rail (Brackets)


D3348.01-119-19

Photo No. 11 Top Rail-Bracket-Post Attachment (In-Line Application)

Photo No. 12 Bottom Rail-Bracket-Post Attachment (In-Line Application)


D3348.01-119-19

APPENDIX C

Product Color Information Letter


Great Railing vinyl guardrail testing 2014

Documents

Transcript of Great Railing vinyl guardrail testing 2014