Graziano & Raulin (2000) Naturalistic Observation and Case-Study Research Graziano and Raulin...
-
Upload
andra-jennings -
Category
Documents
-
view
275 -
download
3
Transcript of Graziano & Raulin (2000) Naturalistic Observation and Case-Study Research Graziano and Raulin...
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Naturalistic Observationand Case-Study Research
Graziano and Raulin
Research Methods: Chapter 6
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Challenge of Low-Constraint Research Usually involves careful observation of
participants in their natural surroundings– Can be very difficult to observe behavior in natural
surroundings– Often we are not sure what behaviors are important
until after we have observed for a while– Without the controls of the laboratory, participants are
free to do what they want to do, and not what we are hoping to observe
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Naturalistic Observation Examples Charles Darwin’s voyage on the HMS
Beagle (the basis for his theory of natural selection)
Jane Goodall's study of chimpanzees Dian Fossey’s study of the mountain gorilla Adeline Levine’s study of the Love Canal Rosenhan’s study of psychiatric
hospitalization
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Case-Study Examples
Sigmund Freud’s study of patients, which formed the basis for his psychoanalytic theory
E. L. Witmer’s study of children in the first psychology clinic in North America
Jean Piaget’s study of the development of children, which led to numerous theories of child development
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Value of these Methods
When to use low-constraint research– For questions involving the natural flow of behavior– When first studying a new research area– When testing the feasibility of a procedure– To test the generalizability of laboratory findings
Information gained from these methods– Provides new descriptive information– Can negate a general proposition– Provides information about contingencies
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Problem Statementsand Hypotheses Problem statements are often general and
flexible in low-constraint research studies– Problem statements and hypotheses may evolve
(i.e, start out general and become more specific) as the study progresses, building on new observations
Unable to test causal hypotheses with low-constraint research
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Making Observations
Unobtrusive observation: observing behavior without participants’ knowledge
Participant observation: observing behavior while participating in the situation
Want to reduce measurement reactivity– People behaving differently when observed
Reactive measures: enhance reactivity Nonreactive measures: minimize reactivity
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Archival Records
Exist independent of a research study– Kept for purposes other than research, but they
may be valuable in some research studies– May include government records, school and
hospital records, census data, etc. Access to such archival records are
restricted by legal and ethical constraints Valuable data source for some studies
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Ethical Issues
Use of unobtrusive measures (including archival records) raises ethical issues– Participants are not given the right to consent– Some of the archival records contain sensitive data
Researchers need to show the necessity for unobtrusive measures and safeguards to protect the rights of the participants– Must have IRB approval
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sampling of Participants
Try to obtain a representative sample– Representative samples allow us to generalize
findings to the larger group Sampling is often not under the control of the
researcher in low-constraint research– Therefore, caution is required in interpreting the
results– Generalize only to similar participants and NOT to
the general population
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sampling of Situations
People (and animals) behave differently in different situations– To get an adequate picture of behavior, we need
to sample the behavior in many situations Sampling many situations will give us an
idea of how consistent behavior is It also gives clues about what factors may
be affecting the behavior
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sampling of Behaviors
Even in the same situation, people may behave differently on different occasions– Repeated sampling of behavior in a specific
situation will indicate the consistency of the behavior
Repeated observation (essentially a replication) prevents us from developing theories based on a single, unusual behavioral response of the organism
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Evaluating the Data
The data from low-constraint research is a rich set of information– Data usually needs to be coded to provide
simplification and organization– The analyses will depend on the questions and
the level of data produced after coding Must be cautious in interpreting data from
low-constraint research
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Limitations
Poor representativeness Poor replicability Ex post facto fallacy Limitations of the observer Going Beyond the Data
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Poor Representativeness
Most low-constraint studies have small samples that were not randomly selected from the population
Rarely do the samples represent the population
Consequently, it is dangerous to generalize your findings to the population
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Poor Replicability
Studies can be replicated only if– The procedures are clearly specified– The procedures were followed exactly
In low-constraint research– Procedures are often not specified – They may change as the study continues– They are often unique to the observer
Therefore, replication is very difficult
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Ex Post Facto Fallacy
Interpreting an observed contingency as if it represented a causal connection– Low-constraint observation will never provide
the controls for such strong conclusions If ex post facto conclusions are interpreted
as hypotheses for further research, and not as established facts, then they serve a useful scientific purpose
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Limitations of the Observer
Low-constraint studies often rely on the observational skills of the researcher
Detailed procedures are not specified– Specific procedures would decrease flexibility– However, detailed procedures could constrain
the observer in a way that would limit experimenter biases
Give up some control for the flexibility
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Experimenter Bias
Without the controls found in higher constraint research, it is difficult for the researcher to avoid influencing participants– Experimenter reactivity is the term used to
describe this unwanted influence on the participants’ behavior
Experimenter effects can be controlled in higher-constraint research
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Going Beyond the Data
Low-constraint data are often intriguing Nevertheless, one must be careful in drawing
strong conclusions Rosenhan has been criticized for broadly
over-interpreting his data, even distorting the data
Interpretation should take into account other information we know about a phenomenon
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Survey Research
A widely used research technique– Provides information about people’s attitudes,
experience, and knowledge– Used extensively today by researchers,
politicians, and news organizations First introduced in the 1830s in England
– Study the impact of the Industrial Revolution on people’s lives
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Types of Surveys
Status surveys– Descriptive survey about the current status of
the population sampled– Descriptive information can guide policy and
inform policy makers Survey research
– Seeks to identify relationships among the variables studied in the survey
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Steps in Survey Research
Determine what you want to study Define the population to be studied Design, construct, pilot, and refine the survey
instrument Select a representative sample Administer the survey Analyze, interpret, and communicate the
results
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Form of the Survey Instrument
Group-administered survey– Written survey with instructions included– Administered in groups or through the mail
Individual survey schedule– Administered in person or over the phone– Can be rather complex, provided there is a clear
procedure for the interviewer to follow– Allows clarification more easily than in group-
administered surveys
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Developing a Survey Instrument
Use clear language and explicit instructions Types and number of questions will depend
on the purpose and the type of survey planned
Types of items– Open-ended items– Multiple-choice items– Likert-scale items
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sample Open-Ended Questions
How do you typically handle interpersonal difficulties with your co-workers?
What are the most important values to instill into today’s children?
If you were president, what issues would you make your top priority?
What situations are particularly stressful for you?
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sample Multiple-Choice Questions How frequently do
you take a sick day from work?a) never
b) once or twice a year
c) 3 to 5 times a year
d) 6 to 12 times a year
e) at least once a month
Identify the issue that you believe is most critical to this country’s future.a) the economy
b) education
c) integrity in government
d) national defense
e) some other issue
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sample Likert-Scale Questions
Rate each item on the scale shown to indicate your level of agreement:
I believe in the Bill of Rights.strongly agree agree uncertain disagree strongly disagree
I think that everyone should vote.strongly agree agree uncertain disagree strongly disagree
Most politicians cannot be trusted.strongly agree agree uncertain disagree strongly disagree
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Issues in Sampling
Need to clearly define the population and then develop a strategy for adequately sampling from the population– Identify each member of the population– Sample from the comprehensive list
The more representative the sample, the more valid our conclusions from the survey
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sampling Procedures
Nonprobability samples– Convenience sample gathered quickly, but with
little interest in drawing strong conclusions Probability samples
– Simple random sampling Every person has an equal chance of being included
– Stratified random sampling Random sampling within clearly defined strata
(subdivisions of the population)
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Sample Size
Sample size is based on several factors– Costs and time constraints– Degree of precision needed
Larger samples will provide more precise estimates of population parameters
More heterogeneous populations require larger sample sizes
The larger the sample, the more narrow the confidence intervals
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Research Design of Surveys
Cross-sectional designs– Administer the survey once to a sample
Longitudinal designs– Repeatedly survey the same participants– Allows us to see changes in attitudes,
experience, and knowledge over time– Difficult to get participants to submit to such
long-term research
Graziano & Raulin (2000)
Summary
Low-constraint research methods provide valuable information
Types of low-constraint research– Naturalistic observation – Case-study research– Surveys
Appropriate caution must be used because of the inherent limitations of these methods