Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A....

31
Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    224
  • download

    1

Transcript of Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A....

Page 1: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing

Current Status and Future Progress

Fredrick A. Jenet

Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy

University of Texas at Brownsville

Page 2: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Collaborators

Dick ManchesterATNF/CSIRO

Australia

George HobbsATNF/CSIRO

Australia

KJ LeePeking U.

China

Andrea LommenFranklin & Marshall

USA

Shane L. LarsonPenn State

USA

Linqing WenAEI

Germany

Teviet CreightonCaltech

USA

John ArmstrongJPLUSA

Page 3: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Main Points

• Radio pulsar can directly detect gravitational waves– How can you do that?

• What can we learn?– Astrophysics– Gravity

• Current State of affairs• What can the SKA do.

Page 4: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Radio Pulsars

Page 5: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Gravitational Waves

“Ripples in the fabric of space-time itself”

g = + h

h / t + 2 h = 4 T

G (g) = 8 T

Page 6: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Pulsar Timing

• Pulsar timing is the act of measuring the arrival times of the individual pulses

Page 7: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How does one detect G-waves using Radio pulsars?

Pulsar timing involves measuring the time-of arrival (TOA) of each individual pulse and then subtracting off the expected time-of-arrival given a physical model of the system.

R = TOA – TOAm

Page 8: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Timing residuals from PSR B1855+09

From Jenet, Lommen, Larson, & Wen, ApJ , May, 2004

Data from Kaspi et al. 1994

Period =5.36 msOrbital Period =12.32 days

Page 9: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The effect of G-waves on the Timing residuals

Page 10: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

h = R Rrms 1 s h >= 1 s /N1/2

10-14

10-13

10-12

3 10-9

h

Frequency, Hz

3 10-8 3 10-7

10-15

10-16

3 10-103 10-11

Sensitivity of a Pulsar timing “Detector”

*3C 66B 1010 Msun BBH

@ a distance of 20 Mpc

109 Msun BBH@ a distance of 20 Mpc

SMBH Background

*OJ287

Page 11: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Stochastic Background

hc(f) = A f

gw(f) = (2 2/3 H02) f2 hc(f)2

Super-massive Black Holes:

= -2/3A = 10-15 - 10-14 yrs-2/3

Characterized by its “Characterictic Strain” Spectrum:

•Jaffe & Backer (2002)•Wyithe & Lobe (2002)•Enoki, Inoue, Nagashima, Sugiyama (2004)

For Cosmic Strings:

= -7/6

A= 10-21 - 10-15 yrs-7/6

•Damour & Vilenkin (2005)

Page 12: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Stochastic Background

The best limits on the background are due to pulsar timing.

For the case where gw(f) is assumed to be a constant (=-1):

Kaspi et al (1994) report gwh2 < 6 10-8 (95% confidence)McHugh et al. (1996) report gwh2 < 9.3 10-8

Frequentist Analysis using Monte-Carlo simulations Yield gwh2 < 1.2 10-7

Page 13: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Stochastic BackgroundThe Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project

Goal:Time 20 pulsars with 100 nano-second residual RMS over 5 years

Current StatusTiming 20 pulsars for 2 years, 5 currently have an RMS < 300 ns

Combining this data with the Kaspi et al data yields:

= -1 : A<4 10-15 yrs-1 gwh2 < 8.8 10-9

= -2/3 : A<6.5 10-15 yrs-2/3 gw(1/20 yrs)h2 < 3.0 10-9

= -7/6 : A<2.2 10-15 yrs-7/6 gw(1/20 yrs)h2 < 6.9 10-9

Page 14: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Stochastic Background

With the SKA: 40 pulsars, 10 ns RMS, 10 years

= -1 : A<3.6 10-17 gwh2 < 6.8 10-13

= -2/3 : A<6.0 10-17 gw(1/10 yrs)h^2 < 4.0 10-13

= -7/6 : A<2.0 10-17 gw(1/10 yrs)h^2 < 2.1 10-13

Page 15: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Stochastic BackgroundA Dream, or almost reality with SKA:40 pulsars, 1 ns RMS, 20 years

= -2/3 : A<1.0 10-18 gw(1/10 yrs)h^2 < 1.0 10-16

The expected background due to white dwarf binaries lies in the range of A = 10-18 - 10-17! (Phinney (2001))

•Individual 108 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~100 Mpc.•Individual 109 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~1 Gpc

Page 16: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The timing residuals for a stochastic background

This is the same for all pulsars.

This depends on the pulsar.

The induced residuals for different pulsars will be correlated.

Page 17: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Expected Correlation Function

Assuming the G-wave background is isotropic:

Page 18: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

The Expected Correlation Function

Page 19: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How to detect the Background

For a set of Np pulsars, calculate all the possible correlations:

Page 20: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How to detect the Background

Page 21: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How to detect the Background

Page 22: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How to detect the Background

Search for the presence of () in C():

Page 23: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How to detect the Background

The expected value of is given by:

In the absence of a correlation, will be Gaussianly distributed with:

Page 24: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

How to detect the BackgroundThe significance of a measured correlation is given by:

Page 25: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Single Pulsar Limit(1 s, 7 years)

Expected Regime

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Page 26: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Single Pulsar Limit(1 s, 7 years)

1 s, 1 year

Expected Regime

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Page 27: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Single Pulsar Limit(1 s, 7 years)

1 s, 1 year(Current ability)

Expected Regime

.1 s5 years

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Page 28: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Single Pulsar Limit(1 s, 7 years)

1 s, 1 year(Current ability)

Expected Regime

.1 s5 years

.1 s10 years

For a background of SMBH binaries: hc = A f-2/3

20 pulsars.

Page 29: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Single Pulsar Limit(1 s, 7 years)

1 s, 1 year(Current ability)

Expected Regime

.1 s5 years

.1 s10 years

SKA10 ns5 years40 pulsars

hc = A f-2/3

Detection SNR for a given level of the SMBH background Using 20 pulsars

Page 30: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

Graviton Mass• Current solar system limits place mg < 4.4 10-22 eV

• 2 = k2 + (2 mg/h)2

• c = 1/ (4 months)

• Detecting 5 year period G-waves reduces the upper bound on the graviton mass by a factor of 15.

• By comparing E&M and G-wave measurements, LISA is expected to make a 3-5 times improvement using LMXRB’s and perhaps up to 10 times better using Helium Cataclismic Variables. (Cutler et al. 2002)

Page 31: Gravitational Wave Detection Using Pulsar Timing Current Status and Future Progress Fredrick A. Jenet Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University.

• Radio pulsars can directly detect gravitational waves– R = h/s , 100 ns (current), 10 ns (SKA)

• What can we learn?– Is GR correct?

• SKA will allow a high SNR measurement of the residual correlation function -> Test polarization properties of G-waves

• Detection implies best limit of Graviton Mass (15-30 x)

– The spectrum of the background set by the astrophysics of the source.

• For SMBHs : Rate, Mass, Distribution (Help LISA?)

• Current Limits– For SMBH, A<6.5 10-15 or gw(1/20 yrs)h2 < 3.0 10-9

• SKA Limits– For SMBH, A<6.0 10-17 or gw(1/10 yrs)h2 < 4.0 10-13

– Dreamland: A<1.0 10-18 or gw(1/10 yrs)h2 < 1.0 10-16

• Individual 108 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~100 Mpc.• Individual 109 solar mass black hole binaries out to ~1 Gpc