Grades 3-6 If You Were the Historian Korean ... - C3 Teachers › wp-content › uploads › 2018...
Transcript of Grades 3-6 If You Were the Historian Korean ... - C3 Teachers › wp-content › uploads › 2018...
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
T H I S W O R K I S L I C E N S E D U N D E R A C R E A T I V E C OMMON S A T T R I B U T I O N - N O N C OMM E R C I A L - S H A R E A L I K E 4 . 0 I N T E R N A T I O N A L L I C E N S E . 1
Grades3-6"IfYouWeretheHistorian"KoreanWarInquiry
What If You Were the Historian?
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
MemoryBankandPrimarySourceInquiryActivity
SupportingQuestions
1. Whatdothesetwoprimarysourcedocumentsrevealaboutthishistoricaleventortopic?
2. Howcanyoucorroborateorcontradictthiswithanadditionalprimarysourcedocumentfromthearchivalmaterials?
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
T H I S W O R K I S L I C E N S E D U N D E R A C R E A T I V E C OMMON S A T T R I B U T I O N - N O N C OMM E R C I A L - S H A R E A L I K E 4 . 0 I N T E R N A T I O N A L L I C E N S E . 2
Grades3-6"IfYouWeretheHistorian"KoreanWarInquiry
WhatIfYouWeretheHistorian?
C3FrameworkIndicatorD2.His.6.3-5.Describehowpeople’sperspectivesshapedthehistoricalsourcestheycreated.D2.His.10.3-5.Compareinformationprovidedbydifferenthistoricalsourcesaboutthepast.
StagingtheCompellingQuestion
Teacherswillhavestudentswatchthefirst35secondsoftheawarenesstestvideoandindividuallyrecordtheirtellingoftheeventinthevideo.Next,rewatchtheentirevideoasaclassandleadawhole-classdiscussionofthevariationsofhistoricaltellingbasedonperspectiveandviewpoint.Introducetheconceptofevaluatinghistoricaldocumentsforperspectiveduringthisdiscussion.Theconceptofcorroboratingorcontradictingdocumentsandsourceswitheachothershouldalsobeintroducedtostudentsinthisstagingactivity.
SupportingQuestion1 SupportingQuestion2
Whatdothesetwoprimarysourcedocumentssayaboutthishistoricaleventortopic?
Howcanyoucorroborateorcontradictthiswithanadditionalprimarysourcedocumentfromthearchivalmaterials?
FormativePerformanceTask
FormativePerformanceTask
UsingthegraphicorganizerinAppendixA,identifythenarrativesandfactssharedbytheseprimarysourcedocumentsabouttheracismexperiencedbyKoreanWarsoldiers.
UsingtheKoreanWarVeteransDigitalMemorialProject,corroborateorcontradicttheinformationsharedinthefeaturedsourcesofSupportingQuestion1.UsethegraphicorganizerinAppendixAtohelporganizeyourthoughts.
FeaturedSources FeaturedSources
SourceA:Oralhistory,JohnSaxtonSourceB:Oralhistory,DottieHarris
SourceA:LinktoKoreanWarMemorialDigitalArchivesSourceB:LinktoInteractiveMemoryBank
SummativePerformanceTask
ARGUMENTConstructanargumentthatevaluatestheprimarysourcedocumentstocreateaone-paragraphsummaryofthetopicorevent.
EXTENSIONStudentscanfurtherexplorethememorybankandprimarysourcedocumentsanddiscusswithapartnerthestrengthsandweaknessesofgenresofprimarysourceinformationinordertoexplorethequestion,“Howdoweknowwhatreallyhappenedinhistory?”
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
3
OverviewofMemoryBankExplorationActivityToexplorethememorybank,teachersandstudentswillwatchtwotothreevideoclipsonacommontopicoreventandthenexplorethearchivesinordertofinddocumentsthatcorroborateorcontradictideasandeventssharedintheoralhistoryclip.AppendixAisanorganizationalframeworkforthisinquiry-drivenactivity.Thememorybankcanberetrievedathttps://koreanwarlegacy.org/chapters/andadditionalarchivalmaterialcanbefoundathttp://www.kwvdm.org/collection.php?p=artifact.
1. Inordertousethedocumentsetprovidedhereasonepossiblevariation,studentsshouldwatchthetwovideosrelatedtotheracismexperiencedbyKoreanWarsoldiers,notingtheexperiencesandfactssharedineachoralhistory.Thesetwooralhistorieshavesomecorroboratingandsomecontradictoryideasandperspectives.
2. Studentswillthenexploretheonlinearchivaldatabasetofindmaterialsthatcorroborateorcontradictthesenarratives.ThegraphicorganizerprovidedinAppendixAisdesignedtohelpstudentsinthisprocess.
Thisactivitycanbealteredtoallowforgreaterflexibilityintermsoftopicorevent,inordertomeetthecontentrequirementsortechnologicalresourcesavailable.Forexample,teacherscouldselectaparticulartopicoreventforstudentstoexplore,orstudentscouldexplorethememorybanktoselectandthenresearchatopicthatintereststhem,asoutlinedinthefollowingtwosteps.
1. Inastudent-drivenactivity,teachersshouldencouragestudentstonavigatetheoralhistorymemorybankindependentlyorinsmallgroups,usingkeytermstheyfindinteresting.Thememorybankhasbeencodedforeasysearchesthatallowstudentstoidentifycommontopicsorevents,andincludesalistoftagsforpossibleareasofexploration.
2. Studentsthensearchthroughthedigitalarchiveofprimarysourcesfordocuments,photos,orartifactsthathelpthembuildagreaterunderstandingofthistopic,seekingtocorroborateorcontradicttheirfindingsfromtheoralhistoryclips.
StagingtheCompellingQuestionTostagetheactivity,teachersmaypromptstudentswiththeAwarenessTestvideo.Teachersshouldshowstudentsthefirst35secondsofthevideo,thenpauseitandaskstudentstospendafewminuteswritingdowntheirretellingoftheeventinthevideo.Whenstudentsarefinishedwriting,teachersshouldreplaytheentirevideoforstudentstoviewtogetherasaclass.Aftertheclassviewstheentirevideo,teacherswillwanttoleadaclassdiscussiononthevariationsofhistoricaltellingsbasedonperspectiveandviewpoint,introducingtheconceptofevaluatinghistoricaldocumentsforperspectivethroughthevarietyofperspectivesprovidedbystudents’individualre-tellingsofthevideo.Students're-tellingsoftheeventsinthevideowillvaryfromindividualtoindividual,providingastartingpointforthisdiscussion.Thisclassdiscussionshouldinclude:
• Anintroductiontotheideaofcorroborationasatoolhistoriansusetogatherthebestinformationabouthistoricaleventsandtheexperiencesofpeoplewholivedthroughthem.
• Anintroductiontotheideathatourperspectiveischangedbywhatwecanactuallysee(asinthecaseofthevideo)aswellastheeraandourown,ortheparticipants’,nationoforigin,beliefsystem,andhistoricalperspective.Historicaldocumentsalmostalwayspresentsomeperspectivesmorethoroughlyand/orfavorablythanothers.
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
4
SummativePerformanceTaskAtthispointintheinquiry,studentshaveexaminedavarietyofprimarysourcesonatopicofinterestandattemptedtofindcorroboratingand/orconflictingevidenceindocumentsdiscoveredwhilesearchingarchivalmaterial.Inthissummativeperformancetask,studentsshouldevaluatetheevidencetheyhavegatheredandengageinwritingaparagraphthatsummarizestheeventortopic.ThetopicprovidedwasracismasexperiencedbysoldiersintheKoreanWar.Studentsshouldbeabletodemonstratethebreadthoftheirunderstandingandtheirabilitytouseevidencefrommultiplesourcestosupporttheirclaims.Inthistask,studentsconstructanevidence-basedevaluationusingmultiplesources,andhistoricalthinkingandevaluativeskillstobuildaninterpretationofaneventortopicfromhistory.Asanextension,studentsmaydigdeeperintothedigitalarchivestoexplorethequestion,“Howdoweknowwhatreallyhappenedinhistory?”Thisextensionactivityasksstudentstoevaluatethestrengthsandlimitationsofdifferenttypesofhistoricalprimarysourcedocuments.ScaffoldsandexamplesofthiscanbefoundinAppendixC.Students’answerstothisextensionquestionwillvary.Somepossibleanswersinclude:
• Historiansmustcorroborateinformationusingavarietyofsourcesinordertoknowwhatreallyhappenedinhistory.
• Wemustconsiderthevoicesthathavebeenomittedfromhistoricaldocumentsinordertounderstandwhatreallyhappenedinhistory;thesevoicesincludethoseofwomen,peopleofcolor,andchildren.
• Wemustselecttherightsourcesforourpurposeandcarefullyevaluatethepointofviewofeach.• Wecan’talwaysknowwhatreallyhappenedinhistory,buthistoriansdeveloptheoriesbasedonthebest
evidenceavailable.
NOTE:Thisinquiryisexpectedtotakefourtofive30-minuteclassperiods.Theinquirytimeframecouldexpandifteachersthinktheirstudentsneedadditionalinstructionalexperiences(i.e.,supportingquestions,formativeperformancetasks,andfeaturedsources).Teachersareencouragedtoadapttheinquiriesinordertomeettherequirementsandinterestsoftheirparticularstudents.Resourcescanalsobemodifiedasnecessarytomeetindividualizededucationprograms(IEPs)orSection504plansforstudentswithdisabilities.
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
5
StagingtheCompellingQuestionFeaturedSource SourceA:Video,AwarenessTest,highlightingthefallibilityoffirst-hand,eye-witnessaccounts,accessibleat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSQJP40PcGI,postedonYouTubebyrickybruce1onMarch11,2008
Retrievedfrom:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSQJP40PcGI
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
6
SupportingQuestion1FeaturedSource SourceA:OralhistoryinterviewwithJohnE.Saxton,anAfricanAmericanwhoservedintheArmyduring
theKoreanWar,KoreanWarLegacyProject,accessibleathttps://koreanwarlegacy.org/interviews/john-e-saxton/
Retrievedfrom:https://koreanwarlegacy.org/interviews/john-e-saxton/
UsedwithpermissionfromtheKoreanWarLegacyProject
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
7
SupportingQuestion1FeaturedSource SourceBOralhistoryinterviewwithDottieHarris,anveteranwhowitnessedracismwhileservingintheAir
Forcefrom1951-1952,accessibleathttps://koreanwarlegacy.org/interviews/dottie-harris/
Retrievedfrom:https://koreanwarlegacy.org/interviews/dottie-harris/UsedwithpermissionfromtheKoreanWarLegacyProject
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
8
AppendixA:ComparingandCorroboratingPrimarySourceDocuments(Organizer)
Topicorevent:___________________________________________
Perspectiveoforalhistory#1: Perspectiveoforalhistory#2:
Whatcorroboratingorcontradictingevidencecanbefoundinthearchives?
Whatreallyhappened?Howdoyouknow?Useevidencefromtheprimarysourcestosupportyourclaim.
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
9
AppendixB:ViewingGuideforOralHistoryVideos(ScaffoldingTool) Oralhistoriesareatoolusedtodocumentpeople’sexperiences.Listentooneoftheveteranstalkingabouthisorherlifeintheoralhistoriesprovided,andreflectonthesequestionsasyoulisten. Veteran’sName:_______________________________________ MilitaryServiceStartYear:_______________________________
MillitaryServiceEndYear:_______________________________
Whataretwofactsyoulearnedabouthistoryfromlisteningtothisoralhistory? 1.
2.
Whatsurprisedyoumostaboutthisstory?Whatdidyoufindmostinteresting?Why?
Whataretwofactsyoulearnedaboutthispersonandtheirperspectivefromlisteningtothisoralhistory? 1.
2.
Whatremainingquestionsdoyouhaveaboutthehistoricaleventsdiscussedorthepeoplewhoexperiencedthem?
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
1 0
AppendixC:ToolsforExploringStrengthsandWeaknessesofPrimarySources“StrengthsandWeaknessesofPrimaryHistoricalSources”(excerpt),SmithsonianInstitution,retrievedfromhttps://library.si.edu
TEACHER RESOURCESSTRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF PRIMARY SOURCES
Primary Source Strengths Weaknesses
From Smithson to Smithsonian: Classroom Activities 7
IMAGES
A visual record obtainedthrough photography orpainting.
• visual record of a particularmoment in time
• conveys a variety of detailsabout people, places,objects, and events
• conveys information abouteveryday life and behaviorthat is best communicatedin visual terms (hair andclothing styles, interiordesign)
• sometimes provides evi-dence of the photographeror painter’s attitude
• important to the study ofpeople who did not leavemany written records
• can stimulate the personalinvolvement of the viewer
• can be used to stimulatethe memory of an oral his-tory informant
• not a complete or objectivesource: the image that servesas the lasting record may notequate directly with the realityof the event itself
• the relationship of the pho-tographer or painter to his orher subject is not always clear
• one must consider the bias orperspective of the photogra-pher or painter, including:
– the choice of subject
– the choice of timing
– the subject matter that a per-son present at the event choseto record
– whether the people or objectshave been manipulated by thephotographer or painter
• the people, place, date, andphotographer or painter areoften not identified
• the emotions and thoughts ofthose involved often are notevident
• information from this kind ofsource is often suggestiverather than definitive; pho-tographs and paintings mustbe studied in conjunctionwith other evidence, i.e., doc-uments and oral histories, todetermine if the informationis unusual or part of a largerpattern
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
1 1
TEACHER RESOURCESSTRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF PRIMARY SOURCES
Primary Source Strengths WeaknessesPrimary Source Strengths WeaknessesDOCUMENTS
Printed or written materialsthat communicate and recordinformation.
Examples include:
diaries; letters; birth/death, ormarriage certificates; deeds;contracts, constitutions, laws,court records; tax records;census records; wills, invento-ries; treaties; report cards;medical records; passengerlists; passports; visas; natural-ization papers; militaryenlistment or dischargepapers.
• provide information onthe “who, what, where,when, why, and how” ofan event
• provide written, printed,or graphic information
• purpose of the communi-cation or transaction isoften clear
• may indicate the socialand economic status ofthe author
• may offer insight into theemotional state of theauthor
• can stimulate the personalinvolvement of the reader
• may not be a thoroughlyobjective source
• generally a verbal, ratherthan a visual record
• may not consider otherviews or perspectives onthe same event(s)
• the identity of the authormay be unclear (especiallytrue in the case of govern-ment documents)
• the author is usually nolonger living and there-fore can not be consultedfor verification
• may be difficult to read:handwriting may be diffi-cult to decipher; words orphrases may be unfamiliarand their meanings mayhave changed over time
• documents must be evalu-ated in conjunction withother evidence to deter-mine whether theypresent information thatis exceptional or conformsto previously establishedpatterns
From Smithson to Smithsonian: Classroom Activities 6
TEACHINGTHEC3FRAMEWORK
1 2
TEACHER RESOURCESSTRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF PRIMARY SOURCES
Primary Source Strengths Weaknesses
From Smithson to Smithsonian: Classroom Activities 8
ORAL HISTORY
The record of an individual’s(informant’s) reminiscences,accounts, and interpretations ofthe past in his or her own spo-ken words obtained throughplanned interview(s) and pre-served through the use of audioor video tape, film, or writtentranscription.
• personalizes history byrecording an individual’sremembrances (or opin-ions) about their life or anevent in which they wereinvolved
• provides information abouta topic or time period thatmay otherwise lack docu-mentation in written orarchival records
• often conveys emotionclearly
• contains spontaneity andcandor not always presentin a personally writtenaccount
• may contain unusualdialect or speech patterns
• often informant is livingand may be consulted forclarification or additionalinformation
• memory of the informant isfallible
• informant may intentionallyor unintentionally distort theevent or his or her role inthe event, thereby compro-mising the record’s validity
• informant may be reluctantto discuss certain topics,resulting in an inaccurate orincomplete record
• informant’s testimony maynot be consistent from oneinterview to the next
• the bias, objective, or therelationship of the interview-er to those being interviewedmust be considered
• interviewer’s questions mayintentionally or unintention-ally influence theinformant’s response
• unfamiliar words or phrasesfrom another time may notbe clarified by informant
• the bias of the historian orinterviewer may be evidentin the edited version of theinterview(s)
• oral history is the mutualcreation of the historian andthe person being inter-viewed: the historian createsthe topic or problem to bestudied, and the informantprovides the information
• oral histories must be evalu-ated in conjunction withother evidence to determinewhether they present infor-mation that is exceptional orconforms to previously estab-lished patterns