Governance of stem cell therapy Consequences of innovation · 2018-08-02 · Reference and...

40
Governance of stem cell therapy Consequences of innovation Prof. Dr. med. Gustav Steinhoff Department of Cardiac Surgery

Transcript of Governance of stem cell therapy Consequences of innovation · 2018-08-02 · Reference and...

  • Governance of stem cell therapyConsequences of innovation

    Prof. Dr. med. Gustav Steinhoff

    Department of Cardiac Surgery

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Bergmann, O. et al. : Turnover after the fallout: Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 2009; 324: 98–102

    Exchange of cardiomyocytes

    Method: Integration of carbon-14, generated by nuclear bomb tests indicates age of cardiomyocytes

    Results:1% turning over annually (age dependent)

    Fewer than 50% of cardiomyocytesare exchanged at the age of 75

    Conclusion: “… it may be rational to work toward the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at stimulating this process in cardiac pathologies.”

    2

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    LVEF Wall motion score index

    5%

    What are the effects of CABG surgery?

    3

    Knapp, M et. al.: Myocardial contractility improvement after coronary artery by-pass grafting in a 1-year observation: The role of myocardial viability assessment, Card. J., 2007, 246–251

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    mod. Dimmeler et al. JCI 2005

    directapplication

    mobilization

    Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Cell delivery

    1.Mobilization (G-GSF)2.Systemic iv injection

    3.Intracoronary injection4.Endocardial injection

    NOGA

    Local implantation imPatch TE

    Heart valve TE

    Action

    HomingExtravasation

    Stem / Progenitor Cell

    Action

    SurgeryCardiology

    Problems observed

    2001: First clinical stem cell application in heart disease (Strauer, Steinhoff)

    Strauer, DüsseldorfIntravascular application MNC BM 3/2001

    Steinhoff, RostockIntramyocardial application CD133 BMSC 6/2001

    IntegrationMigration

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Combined Revascularization (Stent, CABG)• Acute myocardial infarction (immediately - days)• Early after myocardial infarction (< 2 weeks)• Chronic ischemia: Myocardial transition / remodeling

    phase (2 weeks – several months)

    Stand alone• Completed remodeling / scar postischemic

    cardiomyopathy (>6 months)• Refractory angina• Chagas disease

    Clinical indication – acute/chronic ischemia, post infarction

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Stem cell “homing” and vascular activity

    8

    *

    Kaminski A et al. (Lab Investigation 2008)

    Intravital fluorescence microscopy in murine cremaster muscle

    Intravascular application

    Role of endothelial NOS, SDF-1 alpha and local inflammation

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Aspects of ventricular remodeling after infarction

    9

    Slezak et al. 2009

    Connexin 43+ gap junctions

    Control Hibernation

    Myocardial infarction in a mouse heart

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    In vitro differentiation of endothelial cells from CD133-positive origin

    Ong LL et al, Tissue engineering Part C, 2010

    020406080

    100120140160

    CFU

    -EC

    (%)

    0h 24h 48h 72h

    P < 0.005 P < 0.005

    Biological Interaction Network Effect of hypoxia on the differentiation of CD133

    CD133+ cell product from human bone marrow

    10

    1.5% [vol/vol] oxygen and 5% [vol/vol] carbon dioxide

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Hypothesis

    11

    Intramyocardial CD133+ stem cell treatment

    leads to

    better recovery of hibernating myocardium

    in addition to CABG surgery.

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    CD133+ stem cell preparation and transplantation

    12

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    CD133+ stem cell preparation and transplantation

    13

    Clinical setting: CD133+ Isolation with CliniMACS-unit Miltenyi Biotec

    Direct injectioninto myocardium

    150–200ml

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    LAD

    Posteriorinterventricular

    Lateral LV

    viability / stress induced ischemia / reduced wall thickening

    Target area for intramyocardial transepicardial injection

    14

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    A

    C

    B

    Analysis of stem cell related effects during CABG

    Clinical case reports (CD133+, n= …)

    Clinical trials Rostock Phase I (CABG + CD133+, n=15)

    Rostock Phase II (CABG + CD133+, n=20)

    Meta Analysis (CABG + stem cells, n=94)

    Phase III Trial PERFECT

    Clinical real world Rostock REGISTRY (CABG + CD133+, n=99)

    15

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    74 y.o. ♂Stand-alonestem cell therapy2 monthsafter stentedLAD-infarction

    EF 32% EF 47%

    pre op 1 year

    Case report stand alone CD133+ therapy

    16

    A

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    diffe

    renc

    e in

    LVEF

    (%)

    CABG & CD133+ cells CABG

    9.7%

    3.4%

    p=0.0009

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    preop discharge 6 months 18 months

    LVEF

    (%)

    39±947±6* 50±8*

    48±6*

    Phase I Trial / 18 months (n=15) Phase II Trial / 6months (n=20 vs. control)

    25-35 25-40 25-45 >25

    Abso

    lute

    LVE

    F Im

    prov

    emen

    t in

    %

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30Stem cell groupControl group

    subgroup analysisn=35 vs. controln=20 at 6 months

    Increase in myocardial

    perfusionat 6 months

    Rostock phase I/II study early follow-up

    17

    B

    Stamm et al. J Thorac Cardiov Surg, 133(3):717-25; 2007

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Myocardial perfusion after CD133 + CABG – 3years

    0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1

    1,2

    1,4

    1 year 3 years

    CABG+Stem cell Control

    *

    *p

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    CT-Scan B

    19

    No cardiac malformation in all analyzed hearts! (MRI/CT)

    One slight myocardial calcification without functional relevance in treatment group:

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Study No. of patientsTreatment Control

    Age Treatment Control

    Sex, male Treatment Control

    Baseline LVEF Treatment Control

    Follow-up LVEF Treatment Control

    Change of LVEF Treatment Control

    Stamm et al2007, Germany

    20 20 62.0±10.2 63.5±8.4 75 80 37.4±8.4 37.9±10.3 47.1±8.3 41.3±9.1 9.7±8.8 3.4±5.5

    Hendrikx et al2006, Belgium

    10 10 63.2±8.5 66±9.2 100 70 42.9±10.3 39.5±5.5 48.9±9.5 43.1±10.9 6.1±8.6 3.6±9.1

    Ahmadi et al2007, Iran

    18 9 48.6±9.8 50.9±4.7 91.6 57.1 34.3±6.4 29.2±7.8 38.0±5.5 34.3±8.4 3.7±6.3 5.1±4.5

    Mocini et al2005, Italy

    18 18 64.4±8.6 66.9±4.5 94.4 94.4 46.0±6 48.0±8 51.0±9 49.0±9 5.0±8.3 1.0±4.8

    Patel et al2005, USA

    10 10 64.8±3.9 63.6±4.9 80 80 29.4±3.6 30.7±2.5 46.9±1.9 37.2±3.4 16.7±3.2 6.5±1.8

    Zhao et al2008, China

    18 18 60.3±10.4 59.1±15.7 83.3 83.3 35.8±7.3 36.7±9.2 49.1±9.7 40.6±8.4 13.3±9.2 3.9±4.9

    Stamm et al. 2007

    Hendrikx et al. 2006

    Ahmadi et al. 2006

    Moccini et al.2005

    Patel et al. 2005

    Zhao et al. 2006

    Peter Donndorf et al., in review

    B Meta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABG

    20

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    RR Cardiovascular Events.1 1 10

    Combined

    Zhao et al. 2008

    Patel et al. 2005

    Mocini et al. 2005

    Ahmadi et al. 2006

    Hendrikx et al. 2006

    Stamm et al. 2007

    Forrest Plot Fixed Effects

    Major adverse cardiovascular eventsComposite of cardiac death, recurrent MI, revascularisation procedure and stroke

    Favours BMSC Favours control

    Combined

    (95% CI)

    Study

    Stamm et al. 2007

    Hendrikx et al. 2006

    Ahmadi et al. 2006

    Moccini et al.2005

    Patel et al. 2005

    Zhao et al. 2006

    n=179

    Meta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABG

    21

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Overall (I-squared = 81.7%, p = 0.000)

    Ahmadi et al. 2006

    Zhao et al. 2008

    Hendrikx et al. 2006

    ID

    Study

    Mocini et al. 2005

    Patel et al. 2005

    Stamm et al. 2007

    6.94 (5.38, 8.51)

    -1.40 (-5.57, 2.77)

    9.40 (4.58, 14.22)

    2.50 (-5.26, 10.26)

    WMD (95% CI)

    4.00 (-0.43, 8.43)

    10.20 (7.92, 12.48)

    6.30 (1.75, 10.85)

    100.00

    14.04

    10.53

    4.05

    Weight

    %

    12.44

    47.14

    11.80

    6.94 (5.38, 8.51)

    -1.40 (-5.57, 2.77)

    9.40 (4.58, 14.22)

    2.50 (-5.26, 10.26)

    WMD (95% CI)

    4.00 (-0.43, 8.43)

    10.20 (7.92, 12.48)

    6.30 (1.75, 10.85)

    100.00

    14.04

    10.53

    4.05

    Weight

    %

    12.44

    47.14

    11.80

    Favours Control Favours BMSC

    0-5.57 6.94 14.2

    Forest Plot Fixed Effects

    LVEF change (95%CI)

    p=0,001)

    Meta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABG

    22

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Overall ( I-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.715)

    Stamm et al. 2007

    ID

    Patel et al. 2005

    Study

    Ahmadi et al. 2006

    -14.28 (-28.87, 0.32)

    -6.50 (-30.46, 17.46)

    WMD (95% CI)

    -18.00 (-39.11, 3.11)

    -21.60 (-59.18, 15.98)

    100.00

    37.11

    Weight

    47.81

    %

    15.09

    -14.28 (-28.87, 0.32)

    -6.50 (-30.46, 17.46)

    WMD (95% CI)

    -18.00 (-39.11, 3.11)

    -21.60 (-59.18, 15.98)

    100.00

    37.11

    Weight

    47.81

    %

    15.09

    Favours BMSC Favours Control

    0-59.2 -14.3 17.5

    Forest Plot Fixed Effects

    LVEDV follow-up (95%CI)

    Stamm et al. 2007

    Ahmadi et al. 2006

    Patel et al. 2005

    Overall (I-squared= 0.0%,p=0.715)

    -6.50(-30.46,17.46) 37.11

    -21.60(-59.18,15.99) 15.09

    -18.00(-39.11,3.11) 47.81

    -14.28(-28.87,0.32) 100.00

    Study

    WMD(95% CI)

    %

    Weight

    -59,2 -14.3 0 17.5

    Meta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABG

    23

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Conclusion and plans

    A Phase-I clinical feasibility and safety study in 15 CABG patients showed that intramyocardial injection of autologous CD133+ bone marrow cells was not associated with cell-related complications in longterm analysis 1,2.

    In a subsequent Phase-II randomized, controlled, and prospective clinical trial in 40 patients, CABG & intramyocardial injection of CD133+ bone marrow cells resulted in better LV ejection fraction and perfusion than CABG only 3. Longterm safety of the treatment couldbe confirmed 4.

    Phase-III clinical study investigation (multicentre double-blindedrandomized trial) is planned to finish in 2012 for definitive clinicalintroduction in the treatment of chronic ischemia after myocardialinfarction.

    1 Stamm et al. Autologous bone marrow stem-cell transplantation for myocardial regeneration. Lancet, 361(9351);45-6; 20032 Stamm et al. CABG and bone marrow stem cell transplantation after myocardial infarction. Thorac Cardiov Surg, 52(3):152-8; 20043 Stamm et al. Intramyocardial delivery of CD133+ bone marrow cells and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischemic heart

    disease: safety and efficacy sturdies. J Thorac Cardiov Surg, 133(3):717-25; 20074 Yerebakan et al. Safety of intramyocardial stem cell therapy for the ischemic myocardium: Results of the Rostock trial after five year

    follow-up. Cell transplantation 2007; 16(9): 935-40.

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    PERFECT Phase III Studya controlled, prospective, randomized, double blinded multicenter

    trial

    PERFECTINTRAMYOCARDIAL TRANSPLANTATION OF BONE MARROW STEM CELLS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF POST-INFARCT MYOCARDIAL REGENERATION IN ADDITION TO

    CABG SURGERY

    Principal investigator: Prof. Dr. G. SteinhoffSponsor: Miltenyi-Biotec GmbH

    German study centers: Berlin Heart CenterMedical School Hannover

    University of Rostock

    Approved (Phase III clinical trial) by Paul Ehrlich Institute June 2009First patient: October 2009

    Recruitment: 24 monthsPlanned final evaluation: 2012

    CLINICAL OUTCOME STUDY

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Inclusion:

    Postinfarction (2w-6m), reduced LVEF (25-40%MRI), regional hibernation (MRI), indication CABG, 18-79y

    Objectives:

    Primary objective: To determine whether injection of autologously-derived bone marrow stem cells yields a functional benefit in addition to the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operation as determined by left ventricular heart function (LVEF-MRI).

    Secondary objectives: To determine the effects of an injection of autologously-derived bone marrow stem cells on physical exercise capacity, cardiac function, safety and quality of life (QoL).

    PERFECT Phase III Studya controlled, prospective, randomized, double blinded multicenter

    trial

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    PERFECT Phase III Studya controlled, prospective, randomized, double blinded multicenter

    trial 142 Patientsestimated drop-out rate

    15%, randomized in an 1:1 ratio, bone marrow

    aspiration prior to CABG surgery

    71 Patientsto provide 60 evaluable

    patientsfor stem cell group200 ml BM harvest

    5ml CD133+ cells (1-10x106) suspended in

    physiological saline + 10% autologous serumintramyocardially

    71 Patientsto provide 60 evaluable

    patientsfor placebo group200 ml BM harvest

    5ml physiological saline + 10% autologous serum

    intramyocardially

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    PERFECT study (pocket cards)

    28

    Inclusion criteria Previous MI (2w–6m) CABG indicated LVEF 25–40%

    Exclusion criteria Mitral regurgitation Emergency Cancer Claustrophobia Chronic Hepatitis

    Secondary endpoints physical exercise capacity cardiac function safety and quality of life (QoL).

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    screening

    6h 24h

    discharge 6 month

    72h

    1. Cell-/Blood analysis: time points

    post OPpre OP OP

    BMaspiration

    Concomitant research to PERFECT

    29

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    max 10%of aspired bone marrow

    2. Cell analysis

    Isolation of CD133+ cells

    miRNA profile Characterization (sub-populations, FACS) Parvo-Virus Vitality and proliferation (FACS, CFU-Assay) Angiogenesis in vitro und in vivo

    Concomitant research to PERFECT

    30

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    3. Blood analysis

    All patients (Rostock, Hannover, Berlin): Angiogenesis (VEGF, FGF) Stem cell factors (SCF, SDF-1, GCSF) Heart failure (myoglobin) Inflammation reaction (IL-6, IL-8, TNFα) Immune suppression (IL-10) Endothelial activation (sE-Selectin) Monitoring (CMV, EBV, Parvo, HAMA, AFP) Identification of diagnostic markers

    (miRNA, protein patterns)

    ca 60 ml

    Add. Rostock patients: ca. 90 ml blood

    additional time points Angiogenesis in vivo Mobiliziation of endothelial

    progenitor cells (FACS, CFU-Hill)

    Concomitant research to PERFECT

    31

    B

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Clinical real world – the REGISTRY program

    32

    REGISTRY-program treatment of additional cardiovascular indications

    long time FU

    documentation at Rostock University since 2001

    inclusion of further SC-therapy-centers in Germany

    start national SC-register for cardiac application

    C

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Content of the REGISTRY-Database

    33

    Database

    Patient data

    Follow-Up‘s(Laboratory, MRT, Scintigraphy, ECG)

    Information about surgery / product

    Indication

    Screening (Laboratory, MRT, Scintigraphy, ECG)

    Check lists, printed forms

    C

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    34,1279069836,60869565

    38,58461538

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    preop discharge 6 months

    LVEF

    Linear (LVEF)

    REGISTRY / LVEF in CABG + CD133+

    34

    Improvement in LVEF 6 months after CD133 + CABG treatment: (n = 56)

    mean 3.4±10.1 (50% change LVEF > 5%)

    *

    *p=0.005 vs. preop.

    C

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    REGISTRY / Arrhythmia in CABG + CD133+

    -10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    preop postop follow-up

    Mean change in VES / all beat percentage: -0.8%

    CMedian change in number of ventricular ES / h

    35

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    REGISTRY / Survival

    Survival 93% in CABG + CD133+(93 out of 99)

    vs. 88% in Control Phase II

    patient 1 – 10 months (Phase II)patient 2 – 02 months (Registry)patient 3 – 74 months (Phase I)patient 4 – 07 months stroke (Phase I)patient 5 – 81 months (Phase I)patient 6 – 62 months (Registry)

    36

    C

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    1988 - 2009 Animal models, mechanism and safety research

    2001: worldwide first application and phase I study of intramyocardialinjection of purified CD133+ bone marrow stem cells in coronary bypasspatients

    2001 – 2006: Safety and efficacy approval in Phase I (2001-2003) andPhase II (2003-2005) clinical trials

    Since 2006 Reimbursement by German health insurance companies(sDRG)

    2008 Establishment of national reference center for cardiac stem celltherapy (RTC, Rostock)

    2001-2009 Clinical safety and efficacy approval in longterm vigilancestudies

    9/2009 Start of Phase III clinical outcome study (Sponsor: Miltenyi-BiotecGmbH)

    37

    Update 2010

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Intramyocardial CD133+ Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy,

    38

    Clinical research(I) (II) (III)

    EMEA license

    Preclinicalresearch

    Standard therapy

    2009200320011988

    !

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Standardization of cardiac stem cell therapy

    •Indication (ischemia/postinfarction/cardiomyopathy/Htx)•Safety (arrhythmia, tumor, calcification)•Dosage/Toxicity•Standardization of cell preparation•Efficacy (longterm, quality of life)•Biodistribution of cells (migration, survival)•Tumorogenicity•Mechanism of action (paracrine, cellular)•Comparison of different stem cell types

    •CLINICAL OUTCOME (PE,MACE,QoL)

  • Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy / Cardiac Surgery University of Rostock

    Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rostock

    40

    This work was supported by the Helmholtz Gemeinschaft, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Nachwuchsgruppe Regenerative Medizin Regulation der Stammzellmigration 0402710), BMBF BioChance PLUS (0313191), Miltenyi Biotec, Sonderforschungs-bereich/Transregio 37, B5, B2 and A4; and BMBF Reference andTranslation Center of Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy (2008–2011).

    www.cardiac-surgery-rostock.comwww.cardiac-stemcell-therapy.com Cardiac SurgeryA. Liebold / B. Westphal /

    A. Kaminski / P. Donndorf /C. Nesselmann / C. Klopsch

    Research Partners (RTC)N. Ma / P. Mark / W. Li / D. Furlani /R. Gäbel / W. Wang , C. Lux

    Intenational PartnersNU Singapur, Beijing/Hefei/Nankai, ChinaAsahara, CDB/RIKEN, Kobe, JapanRenkeLiToronto, Kanada; Capogrossi, IDI, Rome, ItalyPompilio, Milano, Italy

    R&D Partners:Miltenyi Biotec GmbHD-Trust GmbH, BerlinATP GmbH, RostockHelmholtz (GKSS/Teltow)

    Clinical Development Partners:A. Haverich, MH HannoverR. Hetzer/C. Stamm, DHZ Berlin

    Translation Management G. Tiedemann / J. Große / A. Wagner / J. Gabriel / B.E. Strauer

    Governance of stem cell therapy�Consequences of innovationExchange of cardiomyocytesWhat are the effects of CABG surgery?Foliennummer 42001: First clinical stem cell application in heart disease (Strauer, Steinhoff)Foliennummer 6Foliennummer 7Stem cell “homing” and vascular activityAspects of ventricular remodeling after infarction CD133+ cell product from human bone marrow HypothesisCD133+ stem cell preparation and transplantationCD133+ stem cell preparation and transplantationTarget area for intramyocardial transepicardial injectionAnalysis of stem cell related effects during CABGCase report stand alone CD133+ therapyRostock phase I/II studyearly follow-upMyocardial perfusion after CD133 + CABG – 3years CT-Scan Meta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABGMeta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABGMeta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABGMeta analysis Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cell therapy during CABGConclusion and plans�PERFECT Phase III Study�a controlled, prospective, randomized, double blinded multicenter trial PERFECT Phase III Study�a controlled, prospective, randomized, double blinded multicenter trial PERFECT Phase III Study�a controlled, prospective, randomized, double blinded multicenter trial PERFECT study (pocket cards)Concomitant research to PERFECT Concomitant research to PERFECT Concomitant research to PERFECT Clinical real world – the REGISTRY programContent of the REGISTRY-DatabaseREGISTRY / LVEF in CABG + CD133+REGISTRY / Arrhythmia in CABG + CD133+REGISTRY / SurvivalFoliennummer 37Intramyocardial CD133+ Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy, Foliennummer 39Foliennummer 40