GOEPHYSICAL SURVEYS RECEIVED...2M. —t— 3M-4-l l 31814 | *12*23 |*9t*2( ,j*ac)28I* 1(3(819 i-. t...
Transcript of GOEPHYSICAL SURVEYS RECEIVED...2M. —t— 3M-4-l l 31814 | *12*23 |*9t*2( ,j*ac)28I* 1(3(819 i-. t...
32D12SEM40 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 010
REPORT ON
GOEPHYSICAL SURVEYS
PERFORMED ON
101 CLAIM GROUP
HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIP
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION
MATHESON AREA - ONTARIO
RECEIVEDJUl 2 21982
MINING LANDS SECTION
FOR
H. E. NEAL
BY
PETER G. ATHERTON B.Se.
H. E. NEAL 6. ASSOCIATES LTD.
TORONTO ~ CANADA
July, 1982
32Dt2SE004e 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 010C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 SUMMARY
2.0 INTRODUCTION
3.0 THE PROPERTY
4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS
5.0 PREVIOUS WORK
6.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY
7.0 GEOPHYSICS
7.1 Magnetic Survey7.1.1 Instrument and Sensitivity7.1.2 The Survey
7.2 The Electromagnetic Survey7.2.1 Instrument and Sensitivity7.2.2 The Survey
8.0 RESULTS
8.1 Magnetic Survey
8.2 VLF-EM Survey
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
CERTIFICATE
777
889
11
11
12
13
1.0 SUMMARY
H. E. Neal S Associates Ltd. were contracted to conduct ground magnetic
and VLF-EM surveys over the 101 group of claims by Mr. H. E. Neal in
Holloway Township.
The VLF-EM survey using the Cutler, Maine station located 6 possible
conductors. Most of these conductors appear to be the result of outcrop
ridges or buried ridges. Conductor H-l appears to be located on the
possible northern extension of the Ghostmount Fault.
The magnetic survey outlined the northeasterly trend of the geological
structure. The possible southern contact of the Destor-Porcupine Fault
zone is located in the northern part of the claims. Other strike faults
and North-South faults are also enterpreted from the magnetics.
To further evaluate the property a geological survey is proposed later
in 1982. Maps at a scale of l" to 200' for magnetometer and VLF-EM
surveys accompany this report.
- 2 -
2.0 INTRODUCTION
H. E. Neal S Associates were contracted to conduct ground VLF-EM and
magnetic surveys over 10 claims held by Mr. H. E. Neal in Holloway
Township.
The Jean Alix Co. Ltd. was sub-contracted to cut and chain 10.4 miles of
lines which included an east-west baseline 9,000 feet in length. Cross
lines were cut every 400'. A two man field crew conducted ground VLF-EM
and magnetic surveys over this grid during March 1982. This field crew
was based in Holtyre, Ontario located 26 miles west of the property.
The ground magnetic survey was conducted using a Scintrex MF-l Fluxgate
magnetometer while the VLF-EM survey was conducted with a Geonics EM-16
using the VLF-EM frequency for the Cutler, Maine station.
The results are shown in this report and are to be applied for assessment
credits on all 10 claims.
/r
9
4
ONTARIOQUE.
*\NEAL CLAIMS
KIRKLAND LAKE
!00 ?00
M ITS3or
H E NEAL a ASSOCIATES LTD
TIMMINS
KIFIKLAND LAKE
LOCATION
SCALE 1 in. To
H.E. MEAL A ASSOCIATES LTD.
- 3 -
3.0 THE PROPERTY
The property consists of 10 contiguous claims in Holloway Township.
The claims are held by H. E. Neal, 124 Roxborough Drive, Toronto, Ontario.
The claims are listed below:
L598637 to L598646
2M.—t—
3M-4-
l l
31814 | *12*23 |*9t*2( ,j*ac
)28I* 1(3(819
i-. t ,v T^^ rr^1 ' ' .032504J6J2i05 'e325!5
JL -J l L ^1 liT."---rL ---rL ~ ~ TL ~ ~-ri - "-jr ~ - ,r ~ it -"rr- \r - -1l ' J ^ l ' 1632507 l 6" 508 I"!?0.!'6 *? 1-! 0-l,,,, , 0 "6284 -t* 1632501 I63t 502 I6SZ503 '632 906 | , . ' *~~ ~ ~ L L
' ' ' ' ^ t- ~ ~ t ~ ~ - -f' L . *- l H 5 795 86 j
a ' o *. ^
iS79593'579590 i
(?2 |57I665 j5796*2
56805(41566095 1566056
1*79659 1979658* 34 , .M844 jse*i*' 13001*.J - - -
568196 J566I57 [5,9,58^6i- 15 -M062 599051 ,59909,0 |S99049 I5^046J588I94 1588155'S9905S l, l v J \ ' l l
..- t-.-H---, -r-.,-.-,.,-,.-..
'
---.. , r 4-^ ( -..-^---. . . .
l ' - ^5990271599026 '693025 '99*0241
l l l
j S880I9 |5*tOtO|8880tl 8*90 22
--u-l-l--'-^-l t. l
5S8IC3 JS68I64 (S88IC5l 69904i, 15*9045 J999044 , 89,04v g [ 999 04.'l,l59904' |i6dlCI J586I6.'"J"U""~ ,~i ri" i L~"*7~L~'\T" L"""r i"~T~r~i ' \ i ! i ,' ' ' ' i i i
P)\59 4039 99*034 1999033 '9*903? i39*0 t3lM;*90:0 I588H* '586169 |588I70 '568171 156*172\ l l j \i MclntyrkL , l l
588IC6
l l
•* *J* T- —tX L . r586170
I8?'58SI83
-.. -L....l. - .J^ r L i t [-r-1*99013 I5990J2 j59sOII , ll l 5881871589188l J l""""""""""""""""""
( 566575 538574 p88575 '999010 ,5*8I92 1588193
n's86570 1583569 l 58856B|888367 '986197 1586196W l , l li
l'T '
588177 (588176 '588179
L L
568184 1588165 1586186 l l
^ _ _ i L i L ril l l
.—.x-..,L...L J L J -L
t l 586194 {368199 1986196
-r-j-t |-r-688189 1568012 '586013
bMOC958fl
,| 588 160 ,i3804J '5B
l
BI67 i58804B|ibl
l
568173 ! 5BSI T 4
. — - -I..
588i80 I538I8
11190 '588291 19968*1 156*9(3 J588S64 888565 1588566- [- - L- —j- -7.- -h -f - -| - I'", ~ V ' 1 - I' -
1583014 158:
l l
588559 588358 1588357 1588019 '58
|538554 \iii'. 5? I538.-56 536024 I58S
l L l
l
'.88553 i58355l I588028 J58(
101 GROUP
HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIP
PROPERTY MAPSCALE 1 To 1/2 Mile
H.E, NEAL A ASSOCIATES LTD.
- 4 -
4.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS
The 10 claims are located on Holloway Township, District of Cochrane,
in the Larder Lake Mining Division.
The west side of the claim group is located 26 miles north-east of
the town of Holtyre.
Access to the property is east along Highway 101 to Holloway Lake in
Holloway Township. The claims are located 700' south of the Highway
at this point and are accessible by foot.
- 5 -
5.0 PREVIOUS WORK
1949 - Lobanor Gold Mines Limited drilled 5 diamond drill holes totalling
5,129 feet. Four were drilled on claims held by H. E. Neal.
1960 - Revere Mining Corporation Ltd. conducted ground magnetic and
electrical resistivity surveys over claims held by them. Work
also included 7 drill holes totalling 3,121 feet. This work also
included claims now held by H. E. Neal.
1952 - J. Satterly from the Ontario Department of Mines mapped the
northern part of Holloway Township which also includes the
H. E. Neal claims.
- 6 -
6.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY
The rocks in Holloway Township are Archean in age and belong to the
Abitibi Sub-Province of the Superior Province. The rocks are mainly
Keewatin andesite and basalt with some interflow sediment. A wide
band of sediments occurs roughly parallel to Highway 101 across the
township. The northwestern part of the township is underlain by
mafic to ultramafic intrusives that make up part of the Ghost Range
Syncline.
The rocks face south and dip south at 80 or steeper. The rocks generally
trend east north-east.
The major structural feature in the township is the Destor-Porcupine Fault
Zone which is roughly parallel to and in the vicinity of Highway 101. Some
cross faulting does occur in the township but is usually obscured by
extensive overburden.
The overburden covers approximately 80% of the township and has reported
thickness up to 150'.
A table of formations from Satterly (1953) is shown on the following page.
CKNOZOIC RECENT:i'l.EISTOCENE:
I'RKCAMBKIAN KK WEEN A WAN:
MATACHEWAN:
Al.I.OMAN:
l lBE-Ai.r.oMAN:
KEEWATIN:
Volcanics:
Sediments:
Table of Formations
I'eat: stream deposits.Sand, gravel, boulders; varved clay.
Cirral unconformity
Quartz dialuse.Intmsit* contact
Quartz diabase, diabase.Jntrush* contact
Feldsjvir porphyry; felsite; lamprophyre.Intrusiif contact
Diataise, gabbro; peridotite and dunite (seriK'iiiini/ed); pyroxenite.
Jntrusii* cuntact
I'Rhyolite; rhyolite a^nlonifniu1 and tulT. Andt'site, basalt; pillow lava; diabasic lava; spherulitic lava; frag
mental lava (How breccia or a^loim-ratr); lull and chert; laic- rhiorite schist; carbonate-chlorile schist,
Faulted contact Greywacke; slate; conglomerate; iron formation.
J. Satterly (1953).
7.0 GEOPHYSICS
7.1 Magnetic Survey
7.1.1 Instrument and Sensitivity
The instrument used was a Fluxgate magnetmeter, Model MF-1, manufactured
by Scintrex Limited, It has an accuracy of *0^ from the l,OOOT.to 10,000 f
gamma scale and an accuracy of *1.0/^ at scales greater than 10,000 gammas.
The Fluxgate magnetometer measures the strength of the vertical component
of the total magnetic field. The resulting value is given in gammas.
The magnetic field at any given station will consist of the sum of the
earth's magnetic field and the magnetic field of the bedrock at that
point. The magnetic field of the bedrock is dependent on the concentration
of naturally magnetic minerals in the bedrock or minerals-capable of
possessing a secondary field which is induced by the earth's primary
magnetic field.
7.1.2 The Survey
The magnetic survey was conducted during March 1982 by Dwain Parks over
the entire claim group. Readings were taken at 25' intervals along all
cross lines and at 50' intervals along the baseline. The cross lines were
cut at 400' intervals perpendicular to the baseline. The main base
station for the grid was located on the baseline at 36E with secondary
base stations located on the baseline at 800' intervals.
- 8 -
relative to 36E.
Due to fluctuations in the earth's magnetic field, it is necessary to
make diurnal corrections in order to bring all readings to a common base,
To accomplish this, readings were recorded and a series of base stations
were established along the baseline. These were tied into a base
station. Crosslines were completed in tandem as loops with the first
and last reading corresponding with one baseline station. Even though
different base stations were used, all stations recorded on the grid
could be corrected relative to each other.
The contoured results of the magnetic survey aid in the determination
of strike, dip, location and shape of a magnetic body.
7.2 The Electromagnetic Survey
7.2.1 Instrument and Sensitivity
The instrument used in the survey was a Geonics EM16 VLF-EM. The
sensitivity of the In-phase is *15C^ and Quad-phase is *4070 . The
instrument has a resolution of +17,, The Geonics EM16 has an operating
range of 15 to 25 KHz VLF operating band.
The EM16 is a sensitive receiver which measures the vertical field
components of secondary magnetic fields caused in the following manner.
- 9 -
The VLF transmitting stations have a vertical antenna with a vertical
antenna current. This creates a concentric-horizontal magnetic field
around each station. When the magnetic fields come in contact with
conductive bodies in the ground a secondary magnetic field radiates
from these bodies.
The receiver has two receiving coils with one coil having a vertical axis
and the other a horizontal axis. The signal from the vertical axis
coil is minimized by tilting the instrument which measures the vertical
real component as a percentage. The remaining signal is balanced out
by a measured percentage of a signal from the horizontal coil which gives
an accurate measure of the quadrature vertical signal. The measured
values are relative only.
The VLF station N.A.A., Cutler, Maine was chosen because it is in line
with the strike of the rocks in the area. The results of a survey
when plotted as a profile show the location of various conductors in
the ground.
7.2.2 The Survey
The VLF-EM survey was carried out by C. Curry during March, 1982. This
was part of the overall exploration program conducted by H. E. Neal (x
Associates Ltd. in Holloway Township. The survey was conducted over the
same grid system as the magnetometer survey. Readings were recorded at
- 10 -
50' intervals along the crosslines and recorded as facing north. No
readings were systematically taken along the baseline other than those
that coincided with the Junction of the baseline and cross over lines.
The VLF transmitting station used was N.A.A Cutler, Maine, which has
a transmitting frequency of 17.8 KHz.
- 11 -
8.0 RESULTS
8.1 Magnetic Survey
The magnetic survey revealed the basic trend of the rocks to be in a
northeast southwest direction and dipping steeply to the south.
The magnetic low located in the northwest corner of claim L598641 is
probably due to underlying sediments. The southern contact of this
magnetic low could be the part of the Destor-Porcupine Fault zone or
the Ghostmount Fault which are two major strike faults in the township.
The magnetic low occurring on the north part of claims L598637 and
L598638 is probably due to underlying sediments. This band of
sediments is thought to be sheared and is probably within the
Destor-Porcupine Fault zone.
The magnetic low underlying the south half of the claim group is due
to underlying andesite. There is enough drill hole and outcrop
evidence to support this assumption.
The band of magnetic highs separating the two magnetic lows is probably
due to basalt flows and/or mafic sills that are common in the area.
These bands of magnetic highs are continuous except in the area between
L32E and L56E near the baseline where a strike fault appears to intersect
the rock units. This part of the property is also cut by a north-south
fault probably located west of line 36E.
The small magnetic high on lines 72E and 76E in claim L598645 is likel;
a small mafic intrusion.
- 12 -
8.2 VLF-EM Survey
The VLF-EM survey located 6 conductors. These were assigned numbers f om
H-l to H-6.
Conductors H-4, 5 and 6 are probably caused by outcrop ridges or buried
ridges as they occur in an outcrop area. The profiles have a negative
slope before becoming positive and this is usually indicative of outcrop
ridges and buried ridges.
Conductor H-3 is located on lines 68E and 72E where they cross the
Mattawasaga River, This could be the cause of the conductor or it
could be caused by a combination of buried ridge and the river. The
latter is more likely as the river generally is not marked by such a strong
conductor.
Conductor H-2 is also likely caused by a buried ridge. The profile of
this conductor does not have the strong negative slope that conductors
H-4, 5 and 6 have and may have another cause.
Conductor H-l is located on claim L598641. This conductor shows
characteristics that suggest it is caused by a buried outcrop ridge.
It is also located on the possible extension of the Ghostmount Fault
and could be caused by differences in conductivity between rock types.
- 13 -
9.0 CONCLUSIONS
The magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys were useful in determining the
geological structure. The magnetics also gave a broad indication of
the rock types underlying the claim group. The rocks were shown by
the magnetics to trend northeast-southwest and to be dipping south.
The magnetics suggest the presence of the southern contact of the
Destor-Porcupine Fault zone in the north part of the claim group
and that the shear zone is following a band of sedimentary rocks in
a northeasterly direction. A strike fault is indicated between lines
32E and 56E and trending slightly southeast and a possible north-south
trending cross fault occurs west of line 36E.
Most of the VLF-EM conductors show characteristics that suggest they
are caused by outcrop or buried ridges. Conductor H-l although also
showing this characteristic is also located along the possible northern
extension of the Ghostmount Fault and may be caused by differences in
conductivity between rock types.
A detailed geological survey is recommended for this claim group in an
effort to further evaluate the rest of the VLF-EM conductors and a
geological survey could possibly provide a better explanation for their
existence.
Peter G. Atherton B.Se.
H. E. Neal S Associates Ltd.
CERTIFICATE
I, Peter G. Atherton of 5425 Croydon Road, Burlington, Ontario, do
hereby certify:
1) That I graduated from Brock University in 1975 and have practised
my profession since that time.
2) That I have no interest directly or indirectly nor do I expect to
have any interest in the properties held by H. E. Neal.
3) My report is based on personal examination of the property and
supervision of the surveys being conducted on the property.
Toronto, Ontario
July, 1982
Peter G. Atherton B. Se.
Ontario eocnemical and Expenditures)
32Diaseee4e a.495i HOLLOWAY
/y J, S.J^T^ s si j j O'.- .
900
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
[bate of Survey (from 81 to) l /J c.j r J. l 3(:
_l Day l Mo. | ft. \ Day | Mo. | Yr.
..— ."[Total Miles of line Cut
Mr. | ________________
t C&7 7'(J.v~.;ry t'.-^r. /vi' c. ,v '(,-Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemicai
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
JL12—
^'2^,.
Days per Claim
Days perClaim
Expenditures (exclType of Work PerforRECEIVEDPerformed on Claim(s) JIW -
MINING LANDS SECTIONCalculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.
Date
//v/.;/Recorded (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Prefix
L
lining ClaimNumber
Expend. Days Cr.
lining ClaimPrefix Number
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by thit report of work.
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Poital Address of Person Certifying
l . /, ,\ ^ v ^ t--*-* , f s C i /'
fitd Cert.fitd
Ministryof Geotechnicalpries Report
Ontario _ Approval
File
Mining Lands Comments
To: Geophysics
Comments
l Wish to see again with corrections
To: Geology - Expenditures
Comments
|| Approved [~] Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
To: Geochemistry
Comments
[ ) Approved fi Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature
j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. {Tel: 5-1380)
1593 (81/10)
1982 07 30 2.4951
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastP.O. Box 984Kirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2
Dear Sirs
We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims L 598637 et al in the Township of Holloway.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued.
YOurs very truly.
E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phones 416/965-1316
J. Skurarsc
cct H.E. Neal i Associates Limited Toronto, Ontario Attni Peter Atherton
H. E. MEAL 8. ASSOCIATES LTD.Mineral Consultants
Ste. 607, b5 Queen Street East, Toronto, Canada M5C 1 RG Telephone: (416) 368-0166
July 20, 1982
Mr. F,. F. AndersonDirectorLands Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3
Dear Sir:
Enclosed please find the following property reports submitted for assessment i rork credits by H. E. Neal and Associates Ltd. on behalf of Mr. H. E. Neal.
1) 2 copies - Geophysical Surveys Performed on the 101 Claim Group, Holloway Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Matheson Area-Ontario (two ground magnetometer maps and two VLF-EM maps - scale l" to 200' accompanying each report).
Please note that in the Report of Work Form sent to the Mining Recorder's Office for the Larder Lake Mining Division and received by them May 26, 1982, it was stated that Mr. H. E. Neal would by the author of the accompanying report. Due to unforeseen difficulties encountered by Mr. Neal he was not able to write the report. It was therefore left to me to write the report. Please note this in your records and if there are problems because of this change please Jet me know at the above address.
Respectfully submitted,
X? f c.
Peter G. Atherton B.Se.H. E. Neal d Associates Ltd.
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Sg
lb O
Type of Siirvey(s) Magnetometer and VLF-EM
Township or Area Holloway Township
Claim HolHer(s) H. E. Neal- -
Survey Company H- E. Neal 6. Associates Ltd.
Author of Report Peter G. Atherton
Address of Author c/o H. E. Neal b Associates. 607-55 QueenStreet E., Toronto., Ontario
Covering Dates of Survey March 13. 1982 to July 20. 1982(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line r.nt 10-4 miles
SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical
Electromagnetic-
Magnetometer......
Radiometric. ,,,....
-Other
Oeologiral
nenrhemiral
DAYS per claim
20
20
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic, . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATR- July 20. 1982 SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications c)
Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
L598637 '(prefix)""""
L598638(number)
.L598.63.9..
.L59.864.Q.,
L598641i**!***********!*
i * Hi* ̂ *rtK*tn*
,.L.5.9.864.5..
...L.5.9.8M&;
TOTAL CLAIMS-HL
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Station. Magnetometer 1990 VLF-EM 905 rj..mhPr of Readings Mae 1990 VLF-EM 905
Station interval M*g 25' S. 50 ' VLF-EM 50'_________Line sparing 400'———-————————————
Profile s™ le VLF in to ±40^—^—^^^——-.^.^.^..^————^,^-^—-^————.,.———. Contour interval Mag 100 gammas-—————.^-^——^-—————.———————.——-——.——-
Instrument SCINTREX MF-1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER-—^——————.———.——..——..————-
O
sS
o
Accuracy — Scale constant jft'5% from 1000 gamma to 10,000 gamma scale S +l% for greaterDiurnal correction method BL reading #1 - BL reading #2 divided by # of reaHlngg 10*000 gammas,
n . , , . . progressive adjustment. 0 , Base Station check-in interval (nours)_______________z hours—^^———-—^—^—————————-—Base Station location and value BL 36+OOE 690 gammas
Instrument ____GEONICS EM16 VLF-EMCoil configuration 2 coils l vertical 1 hnr-l7.nnt*tl- ., . NACoil separation ——-——...—-^--————.—^———————-—.Accuracy ______resolution of
Method: OD Fixed transmitter D Shoot back CD In line EH Parallel lineFrequency_____N.A.A. Cutler, Maine 1? T ft KHy________________________________
{specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters measurer! INPHASE Si
InstrumentScale constant .
Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy.
XOH N̂5<0o,QWu)~JQ ZHH
JHH1— (
>*-H
Ht/5i—* CO
Pii
Method D Time Domain CD Frequency DomainParanvtp" On timp Frequency
Off \m\e Range. ...,, ..— Delay time . . . ,,
— Intpprati^n timeo
Power .... ..., - . —————————————————————————
Electrode array ————— - ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————Electrode spacing ———— - ————————————————————————————————————————— — — - ———————————
Tyne of elertrode , _ ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————— - ———
SELF POTENTIALInstrument^——^————-—-..——-.^—--—-...—.———.——.—..—.—^—..—....— Range. Survey Method -^—————————^—^———-———--.^---—^--^^-——..-.——-—.-.^——.
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.
Energy windows (levels)———.--——^—-————.———...——.—.^—..—...—....—-..^——— Height of instrument—-————--—.——-—-—-..—-———.—..—.—Background Count. Size of detector.^--———^-^-——-———^——^——.—-—^——-.————-—^..^—..^.—.^
Overburden ————————————-——-.-———-——-—.—--—.-——.——.————^....-.—(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey-—^——^——^———^-———————————
Instrument ——-——-——-^^———-—-.———-—.——. Accuracy—————--——--—-,———————-^———^—Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) ————
Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy-———-^—-—————————(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used.—-—.—————-—————————.——.—-.—...-.—.
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude——--————.—--—-.--.-..——-—.——...—-..—..^^— Line Sparing
Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight_______ Method of Collection________
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain———————
Drainage Development,———————————Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent
p.p. m. p. p. b.
D D D
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Others _________________________-—Field Analysis (-
Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ————————.——
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____
Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -———-
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
General- General .
K)in
O:SI-
o: LU
FRECHEVILLE TWP M.348
L t Lo l l L
, 52549 l '5254921•r !r 661910 1661909 663729
~~~~f L l L
""" es*82t". j 525494 [525493 i L
.T ~ 'le?84 -6*1632501 1632 50 2 1632503 '632506
- — - f -- - L |L
628048(6280
- L , L it
579593' 579590 '^ 43078 \ 43079 6e2 eio .682809HOI9 \M088
(27Z2Z)\ 596260
~\—————^ 9863 ®
'579591 57958^579587
5988 l 2 l 596613 598611
598644 1598645 598646
S^k^OS^VAj-Ztr ' 4- T! — -VM*H^-V^*34843 —
.^586070 i 56807) i 588072 | 588073J3OD*t3l . . _ _ _~"~~ "5B805 (4 1588055 1588056 588057
588038 88039 [588040 5B9Q4\ ^588042
L i—^ 'i i^l ^" 15-99052,599051 |59905.0 |599049 533048 588156 58BI 57 ,588I58 J588154 I58BI55
6 ' It 8 l l5.9:! ?.5J^--.--^ __ --H--- T l L -T L l L .L
588043 588044588046 ' Yclle--~'"-'"--- — l--— —i-'J^ -v' t-.
588048i583049{568050 ld|C| M816 ,59904 5 9904, 599044'
P)\59 ^9035 ^99034 1599033 I5b903? |59dO (siJ.'S39030 I588|(ift '588169 |588I70 '588171 1588172lL l
\ l i '5^029,599028 599027)599026 L?5 J 588176 ] 588|77 568178 538 ,79 568.80 1586,8,588251 [58/8252L—— ["-IT— hT~!-r— hi" -L"
58802058802I '599022 ! 599023 533 13?'583I83 '588184 1588185 1588186
i j ~ -. i.\j L oL-*. - ——-
O \ '"i I0220A "O V.
5681871583183 '568189 1588190 '588191538264 .588263 |5t!8262
588573 '538574 |S88575 1599010 J588I92 '583193 i 588 194 J588I95 | 588)96
,,L. ____,... .!__,,_____ ' ..J. ____ ! .., L-. '.. ©l L J L , L l L j L j" L l L ( L "j u ~f L ~
0218 j S)J588ft70 1589569 158856 8| 588567 '538197 1588198 J588IB9 I58S012 '588013
3997 /' ^^.l.?i____,J___..l,...' ____ l ..^..{...^i,___1^....
III 1588015 J5880I6 |5880I7 15880161588283 |583290 '588291 158856^ 1586563 1538564 588565
578850 1578848 ;578849i .
588561 588560 l 00"! i —— -, l53 3289 568 292 l 588559 588558 1588557 1588019 ' 598020 15880 21 '5880221583023
l l l l l l -——-L---*----l ._J____l__ l l
L l L l L
588284 158828^
1536286538554 533L 55 l5S8o56 538024 1588025 P 588026 ;58B027
5B8553 1568552 .588551 '583028 '588 r i* i
588548 i 588^49 |588550588469 588470 '588477
588468 1588471 '588476 1588540 1588539,588538 '588544 536546
588467 1588472 588475 588541 588542 (538543
588391 588466 |568473 '588474 i 156228
l l ' 1620140 1620104 '620097(562282 ,
aJ620I70 ,642623.6426Z4 J642625 ^
TANNAHILL TWP M. 390
32D12SEW4B 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 200
MOTES
400 sur1;i(,(; lights n;sofvalion along Ihe shores of all
DATE OF ISSUE
f SB - 3 1983
Ministry of Natural ResourcesTORONTO
LEGEND
! J Mi Mt.iJ LAND
F -A, ! i ,f , i,' f) f OH iiUHf-ACf R i (-.M I S ONLY
1. 1 A -L
Lil.'.: N:,! UK uCCUI'A! k'N
Cfi-.WN LAND SALE l-
LCK'.AU D LAND
CANCELLED
WININO Minim, c. 'M vSUP! -Ci: HIGH I i-i ONl V
HIGHWAY ,1 POUTL" N'.;
HOAOS
T MAIL i,
HAILWA1L
ruvvi/n LINE.;.
(P) or
e
(DLO.C'3.
Loc,
C.
M M O.
S.H.O.
TOWNSHIP OF
HOLLOWAYDISiniCTOK
COCHRANE
LARDER LAKEMINIMI. DIVISION
3CALL : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE)
PLAMARCH 7Z M. 356
-.'ATljRAL RESOURCES
32D12SE0e4a 2.495 l HOLLOWAY
10 W
Mag,
LEGEND
1200 V
1000V
800 r
600*
400*
200 *
O*
SYMBOLS
Base station
Contour Interval 100*
INSTRUMENT
SCINTREX MF 1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER
KEY MAP
r
\
101 GROUPOF
H.E. MEAL
GROUND MAGNETOMETERSURVEY
LOT CONC.
HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE
200 O MM H
200
l INCH TO ?00 FFt'T
400 600 FCf. T
H.E. NEAL S. ASSOCIATES LTD.
TORONTO CANADA
DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:
DRAWING No. DATE;
AY 1981
32DiaSE8848 8.4951 HOLLOWAY
10 W
Mag.•iff
LEGEND
1200*
1000*
800*
600*
400 y200 r
O *
SYMBOLS
Base station A *
Contour Interval 100
INSTRUMENT
SCINTREX MF 1 FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER
KEY MAP
\
SC
101 GROUPOF
H.E. NEAL•i
GROUND MAGNETOMETER
SURVEYLOT CONC.
HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE
200 Ol l-l l-Tl-J H bi.
200 400 600 FEET
1 INCH TO 200 FEET
DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:
DRAWING No, DATE:MAY 1981
vNa
32D12SEM48 2.4951 HOLLOWAY 230
Mag.
SYMBOLS
-—— In-phase
-—- Quadrature
Vertical Scale: 1 mohs 14096
INSTRUMENT
GEONICS EM16 VLF-EM
STATION: NAA Cutler.Maine
Frequency 17.8 kHz
VLF CONDUCTOR:
KEY MAP
,,, r
\\
101 GROUPOF
H.E. MEAL
CUTLER
GROUND VLF - EM SURVEY
LOT CONC.
HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT OF COCHRANE
200 200"JrJ M
400 600 FEET
1 INCH TO 200 FEET
H,E. NEAL 8. ASSOCIATES LTD.
TORONTO CAMADA
DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:
DRAWING No. DATE:MAY 1981
2.4951 HOLLOWAY
L 88 E
240
110 W.
Mag.
SYMBOLS
In-phase
Quadrature
Vertical Scale: 1 inch* t
INSTRUMENT
GEONICS EM16 VLF-EM
STATION: NAA Cutler, Maine
Frequency 17.8 kHz
VLF CONDUCTOR:
KEY MAP
101 GROUPOF
H.E. NEAL
CUTLER GROUND VLF - EM SURVEY
LOT CONC.
HOLLOWAY TOWNSHIPDISTRICT* OF COCHRANE
200 O l M l-J M M 1-1"
200 400 600 FEET
1 INCH TO 200 FEET
DRAWN BY : P.G.A. APPROVED BY:
DRAWING No. DATE:MAY 1981