Global overview: Labelling into national nutrition policy · Department of Nutrition for Health and...
Transcript of Global overview: Labelling into national nutrition policy · Department of Nutrition for Health and...
Global overview:
Labelling into national nutrition policy
Chizuru Nishida
Coordinator, Nutrition Policy and Scientific Advice (NPU)
Department of Nutrition for Health and development (NHD)
A Global Action Network on Nutrition Labelling:
Taking action for better informed consumers’ choices
in the Decade of Action on Nutrition
Paris, France, 6 - 7 February 2019
Global overview of country actions
Work of Codex in incorporating obesity
and NCD concerns
WHO work on nutrition labelling
Outline
Global overview of country actions
2009-2010: 1st Global Nutrition Policy Review
123 countries responded
Information on nutrition governance (incl. capacities, coordination mechanisms, surveillance)
Assessment of policies and actions in 6 areas: 1) IYCN (incl SAM/MAM, nutrition & infectious diseases), 2) International Code of Marketing of BMS, 3) School-based programmes, 4) Vitamins and minerals, 5) Obesity and diet-related NCD, 6) Food security and agriculture policies
Data incorporated into WHO Global database on the Implementation of Nutrition Action (GINA) http://www.who.int/nutrition/gina/en/
Results served as background for developing CIP-MIYCN – Final report published in 2013
WHO's work on monitoring policies and actionsto promote healthy diets and nutrition
1993-2001: Monitoring implementation of 1992 ICN commitments Regular review and monitoring of country progress through regional review
meetings between 1992 - 2001
Monitoring of development, operationalization & implementation of multisectoral national plans of action on nutrition addressing the double burden of malnutrition based on 9 strategic actions
WHO Global Database on National Nutrition Policies and Programmes
2016: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review
177 countries responded to date (91%)
Information on nutrition governance (incl. capacities, coordination mechanisms, surveillance)
Assessment of policies and actions in 6 areas: 1) MIYCN, 2) Prevention & treatment of acute malnutrition, 3) Nutrition and infectious diseases, 4) School health & nutrition programmes, 5) Vitamin and mineral nutrition, 6) Promotion of healthy diet and prevention of overweight, obesity and diet-related NCDs
Coverage/inclusion of Global Nutrition and diet-related NCD Targets in national policies
Data will be incorporated into GINA
Results will contribute to:
• Monitoring of ICN2 FFA implementation
• Assessing baseline for the Decade of Action on Nutrition
Policy measures for promoting healthy diet
in 158 countries
Source: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016 – 2017 (WHO 2018)
76%81%
57%
43%
19%27% 30%
12%
72%
83%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Policy measures for promoting healthy diet
in 158 countries
Source: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016 – 2017 (WHO 2018)
Types of nutrition labelling being implemented
in 124 countries
Source: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016 – 2017 (WHO 2018)
Source: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016 – 2017 (WHO 2018)
Mandatory or voluntary nutrient declaration
in 74 countries
Source: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016 – 2017 (WHO 2018)
Mandatory nutrients to be declared
in 66 countries
Source: 2nd Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016 – 2017 (WHO 2018)
Elements used in FOPL systems
in 37 countries
Work of Codex in incorporating
obesity and NCD concerns
Active
Codex Alimentarius Commission
Executive Committee
Vertical / Commodity
Committees
Horizontal / General
Committees
Ad-hoc Intergovernmental
Task Forces
Import and Export
Inspection and
Certification Systems
(Australia)
Food Labelling
(Canada)
General Principles
(France)
Residues of Veterinary
Drugs in Foods
(United States)
Food Additives
(China)
Pesticide Residues
(China)
Contaminants in Foods
(Netherlands)Food Hygiene
(United States)
Methods of Analysis
and Sampling
(Hungary)
Nutrition and Foods for
Special Dietary Uses
(Germany)
Adjourned sine die
Fish and Fishery
Products
(Norway)
Processed Fruits
and Vegetables
(United States)
Fats and Oils
(Malaysia)
* Sugars
(Colombia)
Meat Hygiene
(New Zealand)
Natural Mineral Waters
(Switzerland)
Vegetable Proteins
(Canada)
Fresh Fruits
and Vegetables
(Mexico)
Spices and Culinary
Herbs
(India)
* Milk and Milk Products
(New Zealand)
Cocoa Products
and Chocolate
(Switzerland)
FAO/WHO Regional Coordinating Committees
Africa
(Kenya)
Asia
(India)
Europe
(Kazakhstan)
Latin America and
the Caribbean
(Chile)
North America and
South West Pacific
(Vanuatu)
Near East
(Iran)
Animal Feeding
(Switzerland)
Fruit Juices
(Brazil)
Foods Derived from
Biotechnology
(Japan)
Processing and Handling
of Quick Frozen Foods
(Thailand)
Dissolved
* Cereals, Pulses and
Legumes
(United States)
* Working by correspondence
Active
Antimicrobial
Resistance
(Republic of Korea)
Nutrition-related issues considered in recent years
include:
Infant formula
Follow-up formula
Complementary foods
RUTF
Fortification – Biofortificattion
Nutrition labelling
Updated dietary goals (TRS 916) serving as
scientific basis for policy actions (DPAS)
" 4. REQUESTS the Codex Alimentarius Commission to continue to give full
consideration, within the framework of its operational mandate, to evidence-based action it
might take to improve the health standards of foods, consistent with the aims and objectives
of the Strategy"
Paragraph 59 of the Global Strategy states:
Public health efforts may be strengthened by the use of international norms and standards
particularly those drawn up by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Areas for further development could include:
labelling to allow consumers to be better informed about the benefits and content of foods
measures to minimize the impact of marketing on unhealthy dietary patterns
Provision of information about healthy consumption patterns including steps to increase the
consumption of fruits and vegetables
Improving production and processing standards regarding the nutritional quality and safety of
products
endorsed by 57th
WHA in 2004
(WHA 57.17)
Areas of actions proposed to implement DPAS through Codex
CCFL CCNFSDU
1. Nutrition Labelling
2. Nutrition Claims
3. Quantitative Declaration of
Ingredients
4. Modification of Standardized
Foods
1. Nutrition Labelling
2. Nutrition Claims
3. Production and Processing
Standards regarding the
Nutritional Quality and Safety
of Foods
Revising Codex Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling
Revising Codex Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling
Revising Codex Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling
According to Codex, Nutrition labelling comprises 2 components:
Nutrient declarations• a standardized listing of the nutrient content of a food or beverage and is
usually positioned on the back or the side of the package
Supplementary nutrition information• it is provided to supplement rather than replace nutrient declarations
• Only where target populations have a high illiteracy rate should supplementary
nutrition information be used in the absence of nutrient declarations
• it is intended to increase people’s understanding of the nutritional value of a
food and to assist in interpreting the nutrient declaration
• Codex does not define or outline principles for this type of labelling at present
and recognizes that the presentation of supplementary nutrition information
varies
Another component: Nutrition and health claims
refer to any representation that states, suggests or implies that a food has
particular nutritional properties, or that a relationship exists between a
food or food constituent and health
In October 2017, 44th CCFL agreed to start new work to
develop guidelines on FOPL: Prompted by the fact that currently there is no specific Codex
guideline or guidance on front-of-pack labelling as such
In July 2018, 41st CAC approved the new work.
Codex work in developing FOPL guidelines includes:
Reviewing existing guidelines
Considering key aspects, purpose and scope, definition of
FOPL, etc
Taking into consideration WHO’s work on guiding principles for
FOPL systems and evidence reviews on nutrition labelling that
are being developed as part of the guideline development for
promoting healthy diets
WHO work on nutrition labelling
Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition(endorsed together with the 6 Global Nutrition target 2025 by the 65th WHA in May 2012)
Under Action 3:
As part of the action to stimulate development policies and programmes outside the health sector that recognize and include nutrition, it stated that “Trade measures, taxes and subsidies are an important means of guaranteeing access and enabling healthy dietary choices. They can be powerful tools when associated with adequate information for consumers through nutrition labelling and responsible food marketing, and with social marketing and promotion of healthy diets and healthy lifestyles.”
Nutrition LabellingA policy measure for promoting healthy diet
Global Action Plan for the Prevention and
Control of Noncommunicable Diseases
2013-2020 (adopted by the 66th WHA in May 2013
together with 9 voluntary NCD Global Targets 2025)
Under Objective 3:
One of the policy options for Member
States is to "Promote nutrition labelling,
according to but not limited to,
international standards, in particular the
Codex Alimentarius, for all pre-packaged
foods including those for which nutrition or
health claims are made."
ICN2 Declaration - 10 Commitments (November 2014)
1. Eradicate hunger and prevent all forms of malnutrition
2. Increase investments
3. Enhance sustainable food systems
4. Raise the profile of nutrition
5. Strengthen human and institutional capacities
6. Strengthen and facilitate, contributions and action by all stakeholders
7. Ensure healthy diets throughout the life course
8. Create enabling environment for making informed choices
9. Implement the commitments through the Framework for Action
10. Integrate vison and commitments into the post-2015 agenda
Recommended actions for sustainable food systems promoting healthy diets
Recommendation 15: Explore regulatory and voluntary instruments – such as marketing, publicity
and labelling policies, economic incentives or disincentives in accordance with Codex Alimentarius
and World Trade Organization rules – to promote healthy diets.
Recommended actions for nutrition education and information
Recommendation 19: Implement nutrition education and information interventions based on
national dietary guidelines and coherent policies related to food and diets, through improved school
curricula, nutrition education in the health, agriculture and social protection services, community
interventions and point-of-sale information, including labelling.
ICN2 Framework for Action
Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity
(WHO Director-General to transmit to the 69th WHA in May 2016)
Recommendation 1: Implement comprehensive programmes that promote
the intake of healthy foods and reduce the intake of unhealthy foods and
sugar-sweetened beverages by children and adolescents
1.6 Implement a standardized global nutrient labelling system
1.7 Implement interpretive front-of-pack labelling, supported by public
education of both adults and children for nutrition literacy.
Nutrition LabellingA policy measure and guideline implementation tool for promoting healthy diet
First introduced in late 1980s by NGO and government agencies – endorsement
systems
Starting around 2004, in response to growing consumer interest in nutrition and
demand for healthier products, food industry started to develop FOPL systems to
give products competitive advantage
Starting around 2006, governments and government agencies made
recommendations to food manufacturers and retailers for FOPL systems that would
support consumers to make healthier food choices (e.g. UK, Australia/NZ etc)
Today, more and more proliferation of FOPL systems and symbols
Front-of-pack labelling (FOPL)
25
American Heart
Association’s Heart
Check symbol (1987)
Swedish National Food
Administration’s Green
Keyhole symbol (1989)
Objectives of the meeting were to:
1. review the types of front-of-pack labelling systems that are currently being
implemented/proposed and identify their benefits and limitations
2. review and assess the evidence on the effectiveness of different types of
front-of-pack labelling systems
3. review case studies of countries with experience in implementing front-of-
pack labelling
4. identify issues and considerations for the design and implementation of
front-of-pack labelling systems in order to develop guiding principles and a
guidance framework for implementing front-of-pack labelling
WHO Technical Meeting on
Nutrition Labelling for Promoting Healthy DietLisbon, Portugal, 9 – 11 December 2015
Country experiences reviewed:
─ Chile ─ Mongolia ─ Switzerland ─ USA
─ Ecuador ─ Netherland ─ Thailand
─ Finland ─ New Zealand ─ Tunisia
─ France ─ Portugal ─ UK
Refers to nutrition labelling systems that:
are presented on the front of food packages (in the principal
field of vision) and can be applied across the packaged retail
food supply
comprise an underpinning nutrient profile model that considers
the overall nutrition quality of the product or the nutrients of
concern for NCDs (or both)
present simple, often graphic information on the nutrient
content or nutritional quality of products, to complement the
more detailed nutrient declarations usually provided on the
back of food packages
Front-of-pack labelling (FOPL)
Guiding principles A policy measure and guideline implementation tool for promoting healthy diet
Field-test in countries in 2018-19
Regional meetings:• AMRO/PAHO – November 2017
• SEARO / WPRO – April 2018
• AMRO/PAHO – May 2018
• EMRO – September 2018
15 guiding principles for FOPL system
Overarching principles (5)
Principle 1: The FOPL system should be aligned with national public health and
nutrition policies and food regulations as well as with relevant WHO guidance and
Codex guidelines.
Principle 2: A single system should be developed to improve the impact of the FOPL
system.
Principle 3: Mandatory nutrient declarations on food packages are a pre-requisite for
FOPL systems.
Principle 4: A monitoring and review process should be developed as part of the
overall FOPL system for continuing improvements or adjustments as required.
Principle 5: The aims, scope and principles of the FOPL system should be
transparent and easily accessible.
15 guiding principles for FOPL system
Principles for a collaborative approach to FOPL development (1)
Principle 6: Government should lead the multi-sectoral stakeholder engagement process
for the development of trusted systems, including nutrient profiling criteria.
Principles for FOPL system format (design and content) (4)
Design
Principle 7: The FOPL system should be interpretive, based on symbols, colours, words
and/or quantifiable elements.
Principle 8: The design of FOPL systems should be understandable to all population
sub-groups and be based on the outcome of consumer testing, evidence of system
performance and stakeholder engagement.
Content
Principle 9: Content should encompass nutritional criteria and food components that aim
to inform choice and enable interpretation of food products against risks for diet-related
NCDs and for promoting healthy diets.
Principle 10: The FOPL system should enable appropriate comparisons between food
categories, within a food category, and between foods within a specific food type.
15 guiding principles for FOPL system
Principles for the implementation of FOPL systems (5)
Principle 11: Uptaking of the FOPL system should be encouraged across all eligible
packaged foods, either through regulatory or voluntary approaches.
Principle 12: Early engagement of industry groups and the development of guidance
documents (i.e. style guide) are necessary in facilitating the implementation of the FOPL
system..
Principle 13: Engagement with key opinion leaders (including food and nutrition experts
and the media) and consumers are essential and should be well managed.
Principle 14: Well-resourced public education campaigns and consumer education with
special consideration of techniques to target at-risk groups are necessary for improving
nutrition literary and consumer understanding and use of the FOPL system.
Principle 15: Baseline data should be collected to support monitoring and evaluation of
the impact on consumers and reformulation of food products.
WHO Nutrition Guidance Expert Advisory Group (NUGAG)
Work of the Subgroup on Diet & Health
Guidelines updated: Sodium (2012)
Potassium (2012)
Free sugars (2015)
Draft guidelines completed (for public consultation (2018):
SFA
TFA
Draft guidelines being completed (2019): Total fat
CHO (Starch & Fibre incl. fruit & vegs)
PUFA
Non-sugar sweeteners
Systematic review under preparation: Dietary patterns
Launching of the Subgroup on Policy
Actions
Develop policy guidelines for promoting
healthy diet and nutrition and prevent
obesity and diet-related NCDs through
changing food environment
Call for experts issued in 2017
Start with priority policy measures:
• Fiscal policies, Nutrition labelling policies,
Marketing policies, Trade and investment
policies
Scoping documents prepared for 3 policy
measures
1st meeting held in December 2018
2nd meeting scheduled in December 2019
Rationale for developing guidelines on policy actions
In April 2016, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) declared:
UN Decade of Action on Nutrition (2016 – 2025)
The goal of the Decade is to:
Increase actions at the national, regional and global levels to implement
the recommended actions of the ICN2 Framework for Action
Provides a set of policy options and strategies which governments may
incorporate into their national sectoral or development/investment policies
and plans, and consider in negotiating international agreements to achieve
better nutrition for all.
Rational for developing policy guideline on
nutrition labelling policies
Despite progress in implementing nutrition labelling policies, the policy
impact varies between countries and the effectiveness of the different
components (e.g. nutrient declarations, supplementary nutrition
information) of nutrition labelling policies on specific outcomes (i.e.
consumers’ nutrition and health outcomes, food reformulation, etc) are
uncertain and have not been systematically reviewed.
Undertaking systematic evidence review and developing evidence-
informed recommendations will contribute to more consistent and
effective implementation of nutrition labelling policies as one of the
global commitments in addressing malnutrition in all its forms and
preventing diet-related NCDs.
Codex Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling
Provides guidance on the
procedures for implementing
nutrition labels, i.e.
➢ how to implement nutrient
declarations
➢ which nutrients are to be
declared
➢ what reference values are to be
used
➢ how to present nutrient contents
➢ how to present nutrition labels
(including criteria for legibility)
DO NOT provide any guidance nor
recommendations on nutrition
labelling policies
Thank you