Global Comm. section 2 (2 of 3)
-
Upload
guesteea166 -
Category
Technology
-
view
330 -
download
0
Transcript of Global Comm. section 2 (2 of 3)
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 1
Communication in the Era of Globalization
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 2
Paolo VolontéSociologia dei processi culturali
Politecnico di [email protected]
http://paolovolonte.wordpress.com
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 3
Communication in the Era of Globalization
Today:A New Model of Communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 4
Human beings are capable of producing signification.
Semiologists define “signification” as the act that unites a signifier with a signified – an expression with a certain content – the outcome being what they call a “sign”.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 5
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 6
Human beings are capable of producing signification.
Semiologists define “signification” as the act that unites a signifier with a signified – an expression with a certain content – the outcome being what they call a “sign”.
Signification is the source of meanings, the act whereby they are formed.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 7
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 8
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 9
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 10
«If the foot of a walking man hits a pebble, energy is transferred from the foot to the stone; the latter will be displaced and will eventually come to rest again in a position which is fully determined by such factors as the amount of energy transferred, the shape and weight of the pebble, and the nature of the surface on which it rolls.»
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 11
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
«If, on the other hand, the man kicks a dog instead of the pebble, the dog may jump up and bite him. In this case the relation between the kick and the bite is of a very different order. It is obvious that the dog takes the energy for his reaction from his own metabolism and not from the kick. What is transferred, therefore, is no longer energy, but rather information. In other words, the kick is a piece of behavior that communicates something to the dog, and to this communication the dog reacts with another piece of communication-behavior.»
(Paul Watzlawick, Pragmatics of Human Communication)
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 12
The human being is endowed with that special kind of expertise we call the faculty of signification. It allows her/him to reprocess her/his response to the surrounding world on the basis of the body of experiences s/he accumulated in the course of her/his life.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 13
Signification = act of interrelating the current experience with the heritage of past experiences as a whole: a message (or a situation) is meaningful to us insofar as it acquires a specific arrangement in the context of our overall experience of the surrounding world.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 14
a) Meaning relies primarily on the receiver (it isn’t a matter of the sender nor of the message itself).
Some consequences
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 15
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 16
b) The “first axiom of communication” (P. Watzlawick) is the impossibility of not communicating.
a) Meaning relies primarily on the receiver (it isn’t a matter of the sender nor of the message itself).
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Some consequences
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 17
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 18
c) The world we live in is not made out of things, it is made out of meanings (meaningful situations, meaningful objects, etc.).
a) Meaning relies primarily on the receiver (it isn’t a matter of the sender nor of the message itself).
b) The “first axiom of communication” (P. Watzlawick) is the impossibility of not communicating.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Some consequences
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 19
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 20
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 21
a) Meaning relies primarily on the receiver (it isn’t a matter of the sender nor of the message itself).
b) The “first axiom of communication” (P. Watzlawick) is the impossibility of not communicating.
c) The world we live in does not consist of things, it consists of meanings (meaningful situations, meaningful objects, etc.).
d) The faculty of signification is independent from the occurrence of a state of communication. Signification precedes communication.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Some consequences
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 22
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 23
What does it mean to communicate?
Starting point: in our world signification is a universal feature, while communication is not. Signification is the same as living, communication is just a limited feature of living. Signification is previously here when communication begins, it comes before, it precedes communication.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 24
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 25
What does it mean to communicate?
Starting point: in our world signification is a universal feature, while communication is not. Signification is the same as living, communication is just a limited feature of living. Signification is previously here when communication begins, it comes before, it precedes communication.
Communication is thus the accomplishment of conducts that are able to affect the process of signification of the other, aiming at urging him toward a desired behaviour (or state of mind).
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 26
«Communication is a process involving two information-processing devices. One device modifies the physical environment of the other. As a result, the second device constructs representations similar to representations already stored in the first device»
(Sperber and Wilson)
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 27
Communicating means performing actions in order to modify the behaviour of the other appealing to his/her faculty of signification.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
What does it mean to communicate?
Pamplona, February 2010 Paolo Volonté - Politecnico di Milano 28
To communicate means to modify the physical environment of the Other so that they will realise what we want them to realise.
The “phenomenological-inferential model” of communication
What does it mean to communicate?