Global Anti-Corruption Compliance: Creating a Coordinated...
Transcript of Global Anti-Corruption Compliance: Creating a Coordinated...
Global Anti-Corruption Compliance: Creating a Coordinated Framework for Multiple Jurisdictions
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2013
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Kim Chainey, The Hershey Company, Hershey, PA
Amy L. Sommers, Partner, K&L Gates, Shanghai, China
Edward J. Fishman, Partner, K&L Gates, Washington, D.C.
Elizabeth Robertson, Partner, K&L Gates, London, England
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality
of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory, you may listen via the phone: dial
1-888-601-3873 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please
send us a chat or e-mail [email protected] immediately so we can address
the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your
location by completing each of the following steps:
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of
attendees at your location
• Click the word balloon button to send
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
© Copyright 2013 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved.
MODERATOR: Kim Chainey, The Hershey Company
PANELISTS: Amy L. Sommers, K&L Gates Shanghai
Edward J. Fishman, K&L Gates Washington, D.C.
Elizabeth Robertson, K&L Gates London
Strafford Publishing December 19, 2013
How Can Global Companies Meet the Challenges of Different
Enforcement Approaches?
Spanning the Globe With Anti-Corruption and Anti-Bribery Government Actions
OVERVIEW
klgates.com 5
Battle against corruption and bribery at center-
stage as global financial crisis showcased
economic and social costs of corruption
Significant evolution of laws around the globe
since 1977 enactment of FCPA in the US
2010 UK Bribery Act;
2011 China criminalizes bribery of foreign officials;
2013 Russian Anti-Corruption Law Amendments;
2013 Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law.
Laws mirror each other more than they differ
Social, cultural and political differences affect
global development of anti-corruption and anti-
bribery laws
Wide prosecutorial discretion
Execution is the key – how aggressively
governments enforce their laws makes a
difference
Execution may vary and depends on political
circumstances in each country/region
klgates.com 6
Global companies can take comfort that
approaches to having effective compliance
program are similar country-by-country and region-
by-region
Importance of on-the-ground information, local
support and relationships in structuring global
compliance programs and in responding to
enforcers who knock on your door
Our panelists will share insight on latest
developments in the laws and enforcement in key
regions, and impact on anti-corruption programs
klgates.com 7
klgates.com 9
Brief summary of the anticorruption
legal framework
Recent trends in enforcement
Suggested preventative measures
PRC LEGAL FRAMEWORK - ANTIBRIBERY
klgates.com 10
Bribes to/from officials
The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (“Criminal Law”)
Bribes given/paid Commercially
Anti-Unfair Competition Law & associated regulations (civil offense)
+
Criminal Law (criminal offense)
Bribes to Foreign Officials
Criminal Law (as of 2011)
TWO TYPES OF ANTI-BRIBERY ENFORCEMENT
CURRENTLY UNDERWAY IN CHINA
Official Commercial
klgates.com 11
OFFICIAL BRIBERY ENFORCEMENT – WHAT ARE
DRIVERS?
Internal Party power
struggles
Consolida-tion
Power
Targeted enforcement against key officials (e.g., Bo Xilai, Zhou Yongkan)
klgates.com 12
COMMERCIAL BRIBERY ENFORCEMENT – PRICE-
DRIVEN?
…. WHAT COMES NEXT?
Retail price maint.
• Spring 2013:
• Baby formula
Anticorruption
• Summer 2013:
• Pharma co’s + doctors/hospital personnel
Anticorruption? AML?
• Autumn 2013/Winter 2014: Medical devices? Eyeglasses?
klgates.com 13
WHAT DO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS MEAN FOR
COMPANIES OPERATING IN CHINA?
Good news (sort of): If your company gives a bribe to a PRC official and it comes to light, the PRC gov’t probably isn’t going to prosecute your company
Bad news: If your company is giving commercial bribes, you’re facing a real enforcement risk in from Chinese regulators that could implicate the FCPA even tho’ the behavior appears not to involve ‘officials’ from a China law perspective
klgates.com 14
IMPLICATIONS (CONT’D): CHINAWHYS
Peter Humphrey, respected China-hand and founding
director of ChinaWhys consultancy – arrested:
Global Times: “Paying from 800 ($131) to 2,000 yuan per piece,
the couple started purchasing and collecting Chinese citizens'
personal information, including names of family members,
household property, addresses, overseas travel records and
vehicle ownership.”
Humphrey and his partner/wife were arrested on criminal charges
of trafficking personal information of Chinese citizens
Characterized as part of a nationwide sweep:
“The case is part of a nationwide campaign launched by the Ministry
of Public Security aimed at cracking down on infringement upon
citizens' personal information. Since August 7, police in Shanghai
have captured 126 suspects for illegal trading of personal
information, of them 35 have been detained under criminal charges.
Some 100 million pieces of personal information waiting to be sold
have also been found.” klgates.com 15
IMPLICATIONS (CONT.):
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY - REVIEW
Unhappy recent exits?
Likely whistleblowers?
klgates.com 16
IMPLICATIONS (CONT.):
INTERNAL AUDIT HISTORY - REVIEW
Red flags ?
Have they been
resolved?
If not, is that a smoldering
fire?
klgates.com 17
UNITED STATES AND THE FCPA
klgates.com 18
Ed Fishman
K&L GATES, WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE (202) 778-9456 [email protected]
US: AGGRESSIVE PROSECUTION
US authorities say FCPA prosecutions “a top priority”
Recoveries of enormous amounts of fines and penalties
Disgorgement of profits from tainted contracts, in addition to
fines
Ability to charge multiple offenses on the same set of facts
Exceptionally broad assertion of extraterritorial jurisdiction
Most cases resolved by settlement rather than litigation
Limited case law
Facilitates ability of prosecutors to take increasingly aggressive positions unchecked by judicial authority
klgates.com 19
US: ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE COMPLIANCE
No program can prevent all violations
Three key questions:
Is the company’s compliance program well designed?
Is it being applied in good faith?
Does it work?
US DOJ/SEC Guide: “hallmarks of effective compliance”
Senior management commitment
Policies and procedures
Oversight, autonomy and resources
Risk assessment
Training
Incentives and disciplinary measures.
Due diligence
Confidential reporting and internal investigation.
Periodic testing and review.
klgates.com 20
US: SOURCES OF PROSECUTIONS
Most significant source cases is corporate self-reporting
Leveraging of limited enforcement resources by offering
leniency in exchange for self-reporting
Other sources may become increasingly important
Dodd-Frank whistleblower bounties
10 to 30 percent share of recovery
Tips from employees, former employees, competitors, ex-
spouses
Increased likelihood that authorities will learn of violations
Significant pressure for company to self-report
Increasing international cooperation
klgates.com 21
OECD Convention on Bribery (1997 vs. 2013)
US: INTERNATIONALIZATION OF ANTICORRUPTION EFFORTS
OECD Convention was largely a US initiative
According to Transparency International, of 39 signatories,
only seven were “actively” enforcing their laws implementing
the OECD Convention
Many nations do not make it a priority to devote resources
to expensive prosecutions that may harm domestic
companies
Suggestions that these laws may be used as a competitive weapon against other nations
9 of the 10 largest FCPA cases involved non-US companies.
UK authorities have said that they will prioritize Bribery Act
prosecutions where a UK company was disadvantaged.
klgates.com 23
CORRUPTION RISK IN LATIN AMERICA AND AFRICA
Many countries in these regions are in the bottom
half of Transparency International’s 2012 Corruption
Perceptions Index e.g. Angola (157 of 174); Nigeria (139 of 174); Brazil (69 of
174); Venezuela (165 of 174)
Many of these same countries offer significant business opportunities for global companies
The historical levels of corruption, the size of government contract opportunities and the relative lack of transparency and consistency in regulatory processes creates enormous corruption risk
klgates.com 24
ANTI-CORRUPTION ENFORCEMENT IN BRAZIL
Recent scandals involving public corruption and
infrastructure development for the World Cup and
Olympics prompted Brazilian legislature to enact
robust anti-corruption legislation
The legislation becomes effective in January 2014
and imposes civil (not criminal) penalties on
companies that bribe Brazilian or foreign public
officials; effective compliance is a mitigating factor but
not a full defense
Recent internal investigations or settled U.S.
enforcement proceedings involving Brazil include
Embraer, Eli Lilly and Nature’s Sunshine
klgates.com 25
ANTI-CORRUPTION ENFORCEMENT IN NIGERIA
Several of the largest FCPA settlements involved Nigeria, including the TSKJ Consortium (Bonny Island), Noble Corporation and Panalpina
Nigerian authorities prosecuted and reached
settlements with KBR over the Bonny Island scandal
Nigerian government continues to focus on domestic
public corruption, including ongoing scandal involving
petroleum sales and continuing allegations that
former government officials amassed overseas
fortunes through hidden ownership of companies
involved in oil and gas business
klgates.com 26
KEY LESSONS IN THESE MARKETS
Importance of Due Diligence
Third Party Agents and Local Partners – focus on their
beneficial ownership and shareholders, reputation,
experience/value and compliance culture
Projects and Transactions – ensure the proposed business
makes economic and logical sense; look for “traps” that may
be potential evidence of bribery scheme
M&A Due Diligence – thoroughly vet any target company
operations in high-risk markets
Implementation of Robust Compliance Programs
Training of Local Employees, JV Partners and Agents
Continuous Monitoring and Oversight
Increasing Local Awareness of Anti-Corruption Risks and
Compliance Best Practices
klgates.com 27
UNITED KINGDOM
klgates.com 28
ELIZABETH ROBERTSON
K&L GATES, LONDON OFFICE Head, Corporate Crime Practice Group
+44 (0) 20 7360 8255 [email protected]
BRIBERY ACT 2010
Four Offences
“Bribing” (s1)
“Being bribed” (s2)
“Bribery of a foreign public official” (s6)
UK Public Officials?
“Failure [by a company] to prevent bribery” (s7)
Also consent or connivance by senior officer (s14)
ANYWHERE
And anyone not just public officials
klgates.com 29
DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTS
To become Law in the UK 2014
The power to negotiate deferred prosecutions will be
available to SFO, CPS, FSA and OFT
The onus and the financial burden will be on potential
corporate defendants to make sure they comply with the law
Middle and senior management “go under a bus”?
klgates.com 30
UK BRIBERY ACT – ADEQUATE PROCEDURES
THE SIX GUIDANCE PRINCIPLES FOR PREVENTION
OF BRIBERY
What do we need to demonstrate to show we take this seriously?
Proportionate procedures – anti-bribery procedures that are proportionate to the
specific risks we face and to the nature, scale and complexity of our operations
Top level commitment – senior management demonstrate commitment to
preventing bribery, establish a culture that supports this commitment and
communicate our anti-bribery policy throughout the group
Risk assessment – assess, know and respond to the nature and extent of our
corruption risks
Due diligence – understand the background and reputation of the parties with whom
we do business
Communication (including training) – communicate and effectively embed our
policy controls in our day to day business processes
Monitoring and review – appropriate monitoring and review mechanisms to ensure
compliance with our policy and controls
klgates.com 31
UK DPA V US DPA: A COMPARISON (TAKEN FROM
THE LEGISLATION AND THE DRAFT CODE)
Level of Judicial Oversight
Availability to individual defendants
Selection of the Monitor
Controls on the Monitor
Required Disclosure
klgates.com 32
Discussion
Key Issues and Themes for General Counsel
klgates.com 34