GLASGOW SCHOOL OFART Charles Rennie Mackintosh's Glasgow School of Art-begun in 1896 and completed in 1909-marks the short span of M�;lckintosh's most creative years. It is a building that is remarkable for its inspired use of Scottish vernacular and historic sources, for its response to the dramatic site and as an outstandingly original essay in architectural composition. As Robert Harbison demonstrates here, it is primarily as a work of art that the building must be assessed. Photographs by Martin Charles.

40 AJ 14 June 1989

九

2

AJ 14 June 1989 41

4

3 Flower pattern railings to the north elevation and flower.like brackets beneath the first.floor wi四dow.4 The north elevation to Renfrew Street with the east elevation in the foreground. 5 (opposite) Centre portion of the north elevation: towerlets and curvilinear detail around the entra四ceflanked by the factory.like studio windows.

42 AJ 14 June 1989

The myth about Mackintosh is that he is more a decorator than an architect: his designs are impractical and badly made, though some would say they have great beauty. Like many myths, this one is largely misleading, but ,

partly true. In a sad literal sense, he was more of a

decorator than he should have been-too often he was offered remodelling jobs, not fresh builds, and was reduced to supplying new clothing for pre-existing bodies. In a deeper sense, he could be led astray by his own linear inventiveness. Some have argued that the papery, effete Mackintosh in seductive but not healthy colours-like a pale creature nursing its bruises-is the one the Viennese went for. For impracticality, one turns to the chairs:

many are as uncomfortable as they look and make one wonder whether Mackintosh believed in sitting or whether he had an intense dislike of either meetings or clients. His chairs also exemplify the worst instances of flimsiness and irrational construction. One of the most famous, the great gridded joke on a wing-chair (or settle) from the Willow Tea Rooms, which instead of excluding draughts multiplies them a hundredfold , has a terminal cross-piece in five segments and looks as ifit could be made only from the most dismal odds and ends of timber. 1 N ot surprisingly, like other big Mackintosh pieces, it wobbles. Perhaps its weirdness accounts for its popularity in Italian reproduction-it doesn't reproduce the eccentricities of Mackintosh's piecing, but the result is sturdier.

A beginning and an end However great one thinks he is, Mackintosh rem瀛ns a disturbing case. Before his best building, the Glasgow School of Art, one is reminded of Michelangelo, Gaudi, Philip Webb, and Rietveld-a euphoria soon tempered by remembering how little any of these built, too. Unfortunately, perhaps inevitably, this building and this architect are suigener・is . Th�gh he was a great innovator, if not in the ways commonly supposed, he is well-nigh impossible to follow. Far from founding a sch∞1 ， he didn't even finish a career.

Yet,more career and more fruitful

22rzIZ22，11J;品i2!宮北z::::inatthe school isgenerallyknowntofall two s~age~: the initial design of 18H6~ c~mpleted in ~8HH! and the so-called-; of 1H05, completed in 1HOH. The practical explanation is that at first

t~ere ~~s ~nough m?ney_t~ build ab~~t the original proposal, and that six the completion could be undertake~:2 given M::~~in~osh: s way of working and nature of his development, the truth i-~ complicated than this rough outline Heviewedar川chi吋向i

fromfinal 一even wh 巴ntぬh児旧e創ir evolution had been elaborate. We cannot follow the of Art through the early design stages-b.ec::use ~ll preIÍlI~~nary sket~h~s except the facade , have disappeared. But we nonetheless, establish that some of the transformative details were revisions during construction-sometimes after th~ first version was already standing.

Besides, it is our good fortune to see in one structure various stages in development over the 13・yearperiodinitial design and final cOl1!pletion. His is so rapid and startling th炙 the two the school, the east and west elevations. at times more like distant cousins than ofthe same body. N o-one acquainted with it from afar would

ever guess that the Glasgow School of Art a building made under rigid cost constraints, So too was the Scotland Street School (AJ 6.4.88 pp42-53), another beautiful example of a design of rare elegance from worker, who would appear least likely to flourish under harsh conditions.

Rich in detail By contrast, the School of Art is so evidently lavish in details that impress themselves immediately and indelibly on the memory. Almost everyone knows those extraordinary window brackets that seem to be another exuberant railing many feet the ground. Perhaps they may, in some obscure way, be structural-a kind of insect. bracing for the giant windows. Whatever th~ physical facts , the brackets aren't big to express this structural role, and so they _ make one doubt whether thev are functional. Another possibility, that e~ch set of four of

these metal flowers is a different species, damages our confidence even furtlﾎer in their functional adequacy. Does it help to hear they, ar巴 meantto hold planks for window-cleaners' ladders? Who without seeing it take place would believe it? Binoculars or good photographs and good scale drawings (like those in the excellent School of Art publication on the building's ironwork) are needed to appreciate how-far the variety_goes and how se�re the underlying structural frame remains through all the by-play. Like Gaudi, Mackintosh is an architect we

can burrow into at any point and find an unsuspected complexity that illuminat~s centr緲 principles. Much na�e wonder has been expended on how many intricaci~~.are. wasted far above ground in "Gothic buildings

But much Gothic detail seems superficial by. comDarison with the detail whid� Mackintosn

is p市paredto leave virtually invisible all over his building.

7

8

44 A.I 1,1.1 ",1<' 1 !IH!I

PlAN ~ ~EMENT 庁~'" • L 警告

PLAN ~ ~U5-M5rMENT iL~'"

同'有利

色謹品加

aぃ ι』 "n, , ,

The lesson for the present is not that it is a good thing. to design , design, and design, for we can all think of witty recent works too full of discordant bursts of invention , but that if the architect is deeply enough steeped in his guiding principles , he can produce a work that will go on unfolding and reconfirming its own laws. The 8chool of Art is a supreme instance of organic architecture in that sense, where apparent discords keep resolving themselves as harmonies. They appear discordant in the first place because, like Michelangelo, Mackintosh has arrived at such sublime and unchallengeable confidence that he feels free to be obscul'e and to treat as similarities those which look like disjunctions to most eyes. His

,j power to bind things together paradoxically enables him to tolerate strong discords. The grossest, though not the most

ゲevealing， case in this design of surmounting contradiction is found on the main , north facade. Here the conceptions of the building as a factory 01' a kind of machine , and as a castle or a lovable antique , boldly clash. Our first thought is that the factory wins: it certainly gets more space. Two little towerlets and an infinity of curvilinear detail are crushed betw~èn huge f1at expanses, ofwhich the major portion is � glass grid. It constitutes a supreme fitness and irony that the apotheosis of the Arts and Crafts movemem iri architecture should be a factory for th巴production of art, whose most utilitarian features are call巴d into being by the working r巴quirements of painters and sculptors. That Mackintosh was a student ln the school

10 years before causes something of a sh?~.k ， for'he projects no cosy home , but a forbidding

'

i!loulds on the u~per verticals elevation windows.

metal brackets support

apparatus? More helped brace the original

。f the large studio

rear, south elevation-where way to harling-and the side elevation.

floor. This, and plans, are dated

910, from No 4 Square, Glasgow. On other plans, arrows

inlets and extracts. of sub-basement. 11 of second floor. of first floor. 。f ground floor.

12

13

開

i-臨←脇町

PLAN OF 5EcoND FLooR

L襲きPLAN ザ FIR.n 何~R .

PV.N 01' ~Hl育助・t度n.'fm~ANÐ I"r田r: I"Loo包5

由a司畠~."・腎崎ト ..

- ・・ ・ 4

PlAN ~ (jR'何ND r~.

be巴h ive containing few and very large.cells. The inevitable first impressioll is intimidation before the building's overbearing ~ss. Getting far enough a.川ay to gr.~sp it head.on is impossible. 80 narrow is the ~'treet in relation to the school's length that on first viewing it is likely that the fact the two batches of windows are not equal will be overlooked, yet, three are to the left of the door and four are to the right-the last two shrinking to make a near-balance. Onegreatpl巴asure is carrying out a

complicated centring with each of the three

main elevations.:l But the asymmetry of the architecture is so manifold and so interwoven it would never do to record it exactly in words. 8uffice it to say that it is a game no-one has

played more ingeniously than Mackintosh. He discovered much from constructing two newspaper buildings in downtown Glasgow's even more overshadowed streets and lanes, learning above all that carefully placed recessive details can count more than over-numerous blatant ones.4

The early study for the facade shows a砂p49

A.I 14 .Julle I リH!I 45

section AA tﾍlrough hall, staircase and and short section DD

be marked BB to with the plan)

.臥目柚帽。。 坤凪血<.<kAloCt*，， ~M国嚢 19K). :'ﾋ"" 再

ド←

f 戸炉」F

鼻←←

r ιド←

さ6•• f お研

守句

〆.. /

F 泣1Eτl倒

-17一二JAL

、

そ:内、

7

I

・t

. •• ,

14 Early study for the north elevation. 15 East and west elevations as originally designed, shown in a drawing dated March 1897. 16 Drawing, dated May 1907, showing 'proposed alterations and extensions'. The west elevation to Scott Street is substantially as built, apart from the six carved figures around the three tall windows. 17 North elevation as built.

18

T円I~J_9じA5G9W 5CMQQL 官 ARTPR2P出WA口ëRATI2NS ‘ éXTéN51P.NS

r i

.""'"叶唱胃!\C,OTT !ÞìUt官T

4 臥.:r"THlWOC刻。均胤E"^'α却町四但.旬b

r 信界幹←

β←←

持t

Of ART.

界炉←

缶E孟

SCH??L G凶SG?WTHE

19 +-4HR ..-....，~仰呼

..，・

置】

園園

田且

一ι圃~

T門é GLASG9¥V 5仁円99L j? ART PRop9S颯 ALT�.RATIQNS & EXTENSIQNS

NO 9

H.:m酒田帽 S凪_.<lW<>四..除明M値2 ・.，.

A.J 14 .JUIll' 1 日村!) 47

圃h←f:

ah• 界

恒ド

aと生三会::::;::::t

5中UTI1 EJ.l:VAllQN

山'全面話 鼻炉←

201

1 .

H'~ F

ロ.rvAT10N 咽ロCNro~ .5Tt!m

-t A組. ~判吋

46 A.J 14 .June 1 リ矧j

symmetrical building that looks much more like a standard board school. 1 can detect no sign of passion in it, but perhaps 1 cannot claim that the fact Mackintosh didn't fill out the corresponding right half means that h巴had already transcended it by going even this far. Two details stand out, however-a swooping balustrade and railing on the roof, and large sculptures stranded half-way up. If we transpose the top and bottom edges of

the sketch, we get something surprisingly like the improbable final proportions of the School of Art. Figure sculpture disappears from this elevation only to turn up 10 years later on the west sid巴. Among the oddest features of that design are some enormous protruding stone cylinders that seem inverse echoes of the vacant niches staggered between them. We know from the architect's sketches and notes that he intended these masses to be C�rved into 8-10ft figures: Palladio, Cellini , 8t Francis, and three others, presumably not all Italian. 8trange heroes at this shrine, certainly, and 1 wonder if he didn't come to think the cylinders more apt, more heroic, more truly sculptural than those historical emblems would have been. In any case , their persistence as far as the plans labelled May 1907 shows an irresolution over matters of imagery, which those plumping for Mackintosh the proto-Modernist may prefer not to know about.

Fusion of industry with Arts and Crafts Our first impression of the north facade is that it borrows from industrial structures their strength and anonymity, and struggles towards an impersonal geometric ideal. But, the more we look, the more the force of its deep asymmetry strikes us, and the more power the crushed tower and its converging curves exerClse. 8cale drawings and the photographs 1 have

seen get the proportions wrong. The drawings show things we simply cannot see, such as the storey above the eaves (which Mackintosh set back 11ft to achieve near-invisibilityﾎrom the ground)and ‘accurate' relations between the towers and the surrounding elements, until towers are no longer towers at all. To the eye starved of curves heretofore , these partial or hesitant (that is, shallow) ones are inordinately powerful: all co-operate with each other to create a single focus. Operating in the same spirit are the railings,

which supply a dynamic vertical thrust to the apparently inert horizontal expanses, as if their stone curves were the bases of aspiring towers. In the clustered metal ornaments punctuating the fence (at intervals seeming to ignore rhythms in the building behind them), he has found uncanny geometric analogues for another kind ofvertical thrust, the plant's aiming of its flowers upward.5 Anyone who knows his drawings of plants, some of the mdst accurate yet far-fetched of all botanical notation, will have less trouble believing that Mackintosh could instil so deftly such vital kernels of meaning. 80 the composite burden of the facade is far

from the initial message of its preponderant element. The railings and the towers are a more detached and c巴rebral equivalent of letting ivy obscure a ruin , and countermand the violence of the primary statement without diluting it. The railing remains separate from the body and drapes itself across the front

A.J 14 .Ju"e I!)H!) 49

24

24 Junction between metall-beam and pilaster in the basement lecture room.τhe I-beam is covered with expanded metal and plastered. Can this be an original finish to conceal the nature of the structure and to improve fire resistance? The corbel, apparently supporting the beam, is of stone. 25 Library gallery showing junction between different elements and mix of materials. 26 The basement lecture theatre. 27 The loggia at second-floor level looking towards the covered way or 'chicken run'. This vault-like space, together with the basement life-modelling studio which has a garret-like roof, suggest that Mackintosh was amusing himself by subtly turning the building upside-down.

50 A,J 14.June I~J8リ

differently according to the viewer's position. In a recent visit 1 passed this facade

perhaps 12 times, not always intending to stop, but was halted each tﾍme by some fresh detail whose effect was usually to soften infinitesimally the initial impression of harshness. At first, for example, one assumes the great window frames are unmoulded, except for the strong roll-moulding on the uppe-r verticals (the lower row are ~unmoulded) which we know Mackintosh sent the masons back to cut when their work was ostensibly done, adding significantly to the cost. Subt~er mouldings are 縒ound th~ iron box lintels of these windows; the beams themselves are slightly inset.H 8et-backs are on outside upper corners (two at the right, one at the left), which don't show in elevations. 80 much for Mackintosh the purist. Thi~ is

certainly his most radical , Mod-ernist work; yet all the apparently Modernist features are peculiarities incident to this particular commission. At no time in his domestic designs does anything like this wall of gl_as~ crop~up. And ev~n he~e it is subtly quaì1~ied. The e�rmous glazing bars prod�e final . proportions not so different" from domestic pan-es, so that one can catch oneself reading the upper row as a series of deranged sash windows.

。f iron and stone work on secondary staircases. along the chicken ru目 to

loggia. 29

Though the basic methods of construction are up to date-if not unusual for their tie-steel post and beam, and brick in all internal loadbearing walls-when structure becomes expressive here it is usually in a more traditional material: the museum staircase and the library, the greatest exuberances of this kind, are timber. Otherwise, striking decorative effects occur in wrought iron. Though not averse to new materials, and Webb-like mixtures of new and old, Mackintosh's love is reserved for. the latter. His approach to form is radical , but he thinks in the substances medieval builders hadknown. This facade , in particular, tells essential

truths about the plan as well as some inessential or obsolete ones, for the three main elevations each contain .a 号!l1a)1 ro思lewindow that seems to have stráýed,in at random and lodgeditselfbet.w馥n more regular features. These spur one to consult the plan and to try to determine how necessary it is to light whatever space lies behind , at the cost of this glaring inconsistency. To my satisfaction 1 found that in one case the light originally had a use (in a models' changing room) that replanninghad taken away. But then the small window remained, now only a badge or banner of a

love of deviation from rule. In one important way this is a defiantly practical building: it puts the studio first and lavishes more ceiling height and north light on the great rooms along the street front than any such building of its time, not that there are a great many to compare it to.

lIIusion of function 1n many other ways, the Glasgow 8chool of Art gives an illusion of practicality and a sturdy willingness to do its job. Its most unexpected or adventurous functional solutions are really the outcome of earlier oversights: the famous hen run and loggia-a glass-enclosed corridor jammed against a heavy brick passageway with strong round arches-are only there at the top and back of the building because the (巴arlier) director's private studio blocked passage at that level between the two halves of the building. Mackintosh characteristically preferred to leave his earlier work untouched and to find a flamboyant, somewhat Heath Robinson way round it. 80, when adding fireproof stairs to the earlier half (unaccountably omitted in the first place), he ran them along the outside of the lovely bay windows in the original boardroom, leaving a sliver of air between the vulnerable curve of glass andthe

A.J 14 ,June 1989 51

30 Corner detail of director's office showing a Mackintosh.designed chair (Ieft). 31 Cage surrounding one of the secondary staircases; dungeon imagery coupled with light・hearteddetailing: for example, the progressive advance from the frame of the curved ends of the horizontal bars. 32 The room above the library. Here the floor is suspended by metal straps from the metal beams of the ceiling because the end wall is too perforated by windows to offer adequate support. 33 Studio window looking north. Top.lighting is concealed externally by the cornice.

56 A.J 14 .JUI1C 1 リX!)

massive masonry of the stairs.7 Sets of these stairs are placed at each end of the building, and they outdo each other in rugged expressiveness. Each is topped by an iron cage of indecipherable function and great force , like memori巴s of dungeons now become a figment at the top instead of at the bottom ofthe pile.

Integrated services One of the truly unobtrusive bits of functionality , a system of heatil)g ducts in the walls fed by a central corridor.duct 2 to 3 ft high (in Mackintosh's section) that runs between the basement floor and sub.basement ceiling, was r巴placed with a messier hot.water system in relatively recent times but was judged quite capable of reinstatement a few years ago. The fresh air grilles beside'W� ro.ain

entrance which sUPjJlied. the 司ystem are n?t easily visible. Here; as always, Mackintosh's conception of servicing is recessive: to plan well enough to be able to keep it out of ~ight. One cannot imagine him enjoying, like Lutyens, an odd er!lption of heating or plumbing suddenly surfacing in a grille which makes a face at us. For a building of its age, the Glasgow School

of Art continues to function remarkably close

to the architect's original intentions without its users feeling the need for significant revision. A large part of the credit must go to the sensible and frill.less plan.8 Here and there a fascinating eccentricity, such as the small conservatory dramatically cantilevered high on th巴 south face next to a sketching studio , seems to have lost its original use. Nowadays, drawing from live plants is presumably not an urgent necessity. Here, as usual , Mackintosh expresses maximum force by a modest amount of technical daring.

Move towards timeless details Against this should be put details that are amazingly regressive-if one chooses to view them that way-such as the Tudor skylight openings in one of the eastern corridors. Taken as a whole , the building contains a bewildering?九élαnge of flavours without the single historical allegiance that one may expect from an earlier generation. Mackintosh certainly frees himself from

historical n)ferenc巴 as we move from east to west, but everi at the end he preserves a eontrast very startling to us, b巴tween a叝y workspaces and gloomy corridors. A great deal of dark wood and a few cave-like alr.oves are in the last parts that were built. A

AJ 14.Junc 1 ~)8~) 57

36 Wrought iron bracket supporting timber wall plate in basement life.modelling studio. AII these bracket ends are different. 37 Alcove outside the library. 38 The small conservatory cantilevered out on the south elevation. It was for the nurturing of plants needed for sketching. 39 The garret.like basement life.modelling studio. 40 Ground floor showing contrast of wood fi目ishes: rough boarding f瀋ed with smooth panelling.

58 A.J 14 Junc HJ89

access rishing to visit the Glasgow Art should write in advance g an appointment. 1 am

Ileful to the school' s ~kintosh/Taffner curator, Peter ~wles， for the time he took showing

.~.round and answering my queries. 泊ly ， however, the building is now 調accessible to architects. students 目吋 others than it has sometimes bee~ Ihe past, partly because budget cuts iYe left it short:staffed, and partly 知Useoutside interest is viewed as "rference rather than enrichment Ihe real work of the school. It is, :netheless, a pleasure to see a ‘?四Ißtosh building fully used as ~nded and not simply -embalmed as archaic relic.

life.modelling studios in the west basement features a set of twisted brackets of ultra-Arts and Crafts uniquenessY The library, justly famous for achieving richness without historical flavour , has a most irrational feel. Mackintosh multiplies, but does not combine, its parts to make the balcony and its support system feellike different buildings. And so, in this way, an illusion of height is created (two s~oreys of ceiling and three storeys of window-well) as well as an illusion of incomprehensible intricacy.

The west elevation Just as much as Gaudi, thbugh without doctrinal baggage , Mackintosh is an obscurantist, not a progressive. His greatest work, the west elevation, busily proclaiming things we know cannot be true, exploits the awkward site to give visions of v鑽t¥Ral continuity that incorporate shif�s ofmood within the narrow column from cruelty to extreme vulnerability, from fierce ledges to membranes of insect delicacy and transie¥lce. It is the most paradoxical conjunction between rows of windows all the same in their dimensions and grossly different in their framing from their neighbours. Like the east facade , only more so , the west

facade plays an empty half against a full

one-unbroken roughish masonry on the left, whittled and chewed elegance on the right, barbarism meeting civilisation in moments of awful struggle around the overfed Edwardian door.frame (really a parody of such a frame whose details have mostly passed away in the senile stage it has survived to).

More with less It goes one better than the east face , for masonry is played against window, and then one turns the corner to find masonry contrasted a further time with the harling of the south face; full detail on the west against a skeleton of the former rich system on the south. As often happens , Mackintosh's simplicity reads here like a decadent aftermath. The slender pyramid of features on the south is all that is left of a previous fullness. He continues to be so haunting after the

failure of style and the disappearance of imagery, revived half-cynically these days as a joke, because he found a way to be expressive without imagery, or so we suppose. The secret of these facades is that Mackintosh's freedom is not really freedom but suppression, for here imagery has gone underground , and to our age and way of thinking this is the most moving condition of all. .

A.J 14June I!J8日 59

41