Gideon v. Wainwright

15
By: Derek Schiebel Alex Reller Gideon v. Wainwright

description

 

Transcript of Gideon v. Wainwright

  • 1. By:
    Derek Schiebel
    Alex Reller
    Gideon v. Wainwright
  • 2. Did the state court's failure to appoint counsel for Clarence Gideon violate his right to a fair trial?
    Reason For Trial
  • 3. Supreme Court Justices
    Chief Justice
    Warren Black Douglas Clark Harlan
    Brennan Stewart White Goldberg
  • 4. Argued January 15, 1963.
    Clarence Earl Gideon vs. Wainwright, Florida
    Gideon was charged in a Florida state court with a felony for breaking and entering.
    When he requested the court to appoint an attorney for him, the court refused, stating that it was only obligated to appoint counsel to poverty-stricken defendants in capital cases.
    Gideon was convicted by a jury and the court sentenced him to five years in a state prison.
    Basic Facts about the Case
  • 5. The Sixth Amendment provides, In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
    Clarence Gideon believed he had been violated of this right
    Constitutional Issues
  • 6. In a unanimous opinion, the Court held that Gideon had a right to be represented by a court-appointed attorney
    In this case the Court found that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of counsel was a right, essential to a fair trial, which should be made applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Conclusion
  • 7. Justice Black called it an "obvious truth" that a fair trial for a poor defendant could not be guaranteed without the assistance of counsel. Black commented that "lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.
    Decided March 18, 1963
    9-0 decision (unanimous) for Gideons side
    Conclusion
  • 8. In our piece of mind, we thought that the right victor was chosen, and that he deserved a free trial and not with a un-educated lawyer that he was assigned.
    Our opinion
  • 9.
    • What is the meaning of this compared to the case?
    Poor people wear barrels
    The poor cannot get good enough representation
    Perry Mason wore a barrel
    Lawyers are idiots
  • 10.
    • What is the meaning of this compared to the case?
    Poor people wear barrels
    The poor cannot get good enough representation
    Perry Mason wore a barrel
    Lawyers are idiots
  • 11. What is this political cartoon trying to say about due process?
    A. Republicans dont like the citizens
    B. The government is against fair trials
    C. Fair trial is always attempted, but not always fulfilled
    D. People have no chance against the government
    E. None of the Above
    F. All of the Above
  • 12. What is this political cartoon trying to say about due process?
    A. Republicans dont like the citizens
    B. The government is against fair trials
    C. Fair trial is always attempted, but not always fulfilled
    D. People have no chance against the government
    E. None of the Above
    F. All of the Above
  • 13. "Gideon v. Wainwright." LII | Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School. Web. 18 Feb. 2010. .
    "Gideon v. Wainwright, U.S. Supreme Court Case Summary & Oral Argument." The Oyez Project | Build 6. Web. 18 Feb. 2010. .
    "Gideon v. [email protected]." Welcome to [email protected]. Web. 18 Feb. 2010. .
    Works Cited
  • 14.
  • 15.
    • Producer: Derek Schiebel
    • 16. Editors: Derek Schiebel & Alex Reller
    • 17. Lazy bum: Alex Reller
    • 18. Laptop user: Derek Schiebel
    • 19. Research: Derek Schiebel & Alex Reller (sort of)
    • 20. In memory of Alex Rellers Laptop, which internet would not open.
    Credits