Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
of 264
-
Upload
natascribd -
Category
Documents
-
view
243 -
download
0
Transcript of Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
1/264
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
2/264
J
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
3/264
\
v.- ^
,-~l
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
4/264
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
5/264
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
6/264
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
7/264
HINDU
LAW.
a^
GHARPURE,
B.A.,
LL.B.
(Hons,)
VAKIL,
HIGH
COURT,
BOMBAY.
FIRST
EDITIOMo
BOMBAY
:
MA
RUT
I
BABAJI,
Lmv-Pubiisker..
GIRGAON,
BOMBAY,
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
8/264
[A//
rights
reserved.
]
Pbintkd at
SHRi
Vaxi
Vilas
Fee^, Sbieangam,
TKiCHrKOPOi-r,
ASD
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
9/264
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS.
Page.
Preface
Index
of
Cases
BOOK
I.
Nature,
Scope
arid
Sources
of
Hindu
Law.
Introduction
...
Chapter
I
The
Sources
of Hindu
Law
II
Benami Transactions
and
The
Law
of
Damdupat
BOOK
n.
The
Law
of
Status or
Personal
and
Family
relations.
Chapter
III
Marriage
...
IV
Sonship
and
Adoption...
V
Minority
and
Guardianship
BOOK
III.
The Imw
of
Property.
Chapter VI
Joint
Family
VII
Debts
VIII
Alienations
...
n
IX
Partition
...
...
,,
X
Maintenance
16
724
2530
3249
5077
7884
... 86101
... 102112
...
113133
...
134149
...
150156
BOOK IV.
Tlie
Law
of
Succession.
Chapter
XI
Inheritance
to property
of
a
Male
...
...158
185
XII
Female
... 186211
(Stridhan,
its
characteristics,
kinds
and
succession
to it).
n
XIII
Wills
(Testamentary
Succession)...
...212
224
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
10/264
TAB
LE OF
CASES.
A.
P.
Raja
Rao
Chandra
Rao
V.
Nana
Rao
Krishna
156
127
126
Abachari
v
Ramchindrayya
...
Abaji
Gangadhar v.
Mukta
...
Abdul
Aziz
v.
Appayasami
Naikar
106
Abhai
Charan
v.
Mongal
Jana..
179
Abilakh
Bhagat
v,
Bhekhi
Mahto
181
Abinash
Chandra
Mazutndar
v.
Harinath
Shaha
... 194,
196
Abraham
v.
Abraham...
...
4
Adibai
v.
Karsandas
92,
152,
154
Administrator-General
of
Mad-
ras
V
Anandachari ...
4,
17
Advocate-General
v.
Bai
Pan-
jabai
217
Adwayappa v. Rudrawa
...
165,
167,
182
Agar
Ellis,
In
re
... ... 80
Aghornath
u
Green
Chunder...
Ill
Ahmad
Bhoy
Habib
Bhoy
v.
Cassum
Bhoy
Ahmed
Bhoy. 5
Aiyyagari
Vankataramayya
v.
A.
Ramayya
...
121,
147
Akkanna
-y.
Venkayya
...
189
Akoba
Dada
v. Sakharam
...
192
Akora
v.
Boriani
...
...
165
Alamelu
v.
Rangasami
...
140
Ali
Saheb
v.
Sabji
...
28,
30
Amava
v.
Mahadgavda..
51,
73
Ambabai
v.
Govind
163
Ameer
Bibi
v.
Abdul
...
...
81
Amjad
Ali
v.
Moniram
.
...
191
Ammakannu
v.
Appu
...
...
153
Amolakram
v.
Chandan
Singh.
92
Amratlal
v.
Bapubhai
34
Amritolal
v.
Surnomoyee
Dasee 55
58,
219
Amritolal Mitter
v.
Manick
Lall
150
Anandamoney
Dossey
v. Doe.
D. East
India
Co
127
Anandibai
v.
Kashibai...
57,
73
Anand
Kunwar
v.
Court
of
Wards
194
Ananta
v.
Ramabai ...
...
182
Anant
Bhalchandra
v,
Damodar
Makund
146
Anantha
v. Nagamuthu
...
128
Ananthayya
u
Vishnu...
...
154
Angammal
v.
Venkat
Reddy...
165,
Annaji
v.
Dattatraya
203
Annammah
v.
Mabbu
Bali
Keddy
72,
73
Annamalai
Chetti
v.
Murugesh
Chetcy
98
Annapagauda
v.
Sangada-
yappa...
81,
99
Annapurni
v.
Forbes
...
...
71
Antaji
v. Dattaji
74
Anundamoyee
v. Boykunt Nath
1:^9
Anyaba
v.
Daji...
...
...
195
Appaji
t;.
Keshav
...
.,
114
Appaji
Chintaman
y.
Gangabai.
151
Appaji Narhar
u
Ramchandra. 135
Appasami
v.
Nagappa...
...
130
Appovier
v. Rama Subbayan
88,
146
Arumuga
Mudali
v.
Virara-
gava
M
44,
45
Asar
Purshotam
v.
Ratan
Bai.. 58
Ashabai
v.
Haji
Tyeb
...
t^^,
146
Ashutosh Dutt
v.
Durga
Charn
Lhatterji
218
Audh
Kumari
v.
Chanda Dai...
211
Ayyava
Muppanar
v.
Niladat-
chi
Ammal
...
70,
71,
136,
154
Baba
v.
Timma...
...
...
140
babaji
v. Bha,g:irthibai...
...
63
V.
Kashibai
... ...
147
V.
Krishna
...
...
26
V.
Krishnaji
... ...
119
Babaji Rao
v. Luxmidas
...
131
Babu
Annaji
v.
Ratnoji.,
72,
74
Bachebi
v.
Makhanlal...
...
5
Bachoo
t;.
Khushaldas...
59,61,72,
74,
213
V.
Mankorbai
... 37,
59, 61,
72,
124
Bai
Baiji
v,
Bai
Suntoke
...
5
Daya
v.
Natha
Gobind
...
1.50
Divali
V
Moti
Curson 35,
45
V.
Patel
Bechar-
das
94,127
Jadav
V.
Bai
Mathura
...
65
Jamna
v. Bhai
Shankar
...
193
Kanku
v.
Bai
Jadab
...
150
Khushal
;;.
Lakshmamma,
.
126
Mamubai
v.
Dosa
Morarji
125
Mangal
v.
Bai
Rakhmini.
.
153
Motivahu
V.
Bai
Mamubai.
221
Nani
t;.
Chunilal
...
...
64
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
11/264
Vll
Bai
Parvati
v.
Tarwadi
Dolat-
ram
...
1^^
Premkuar
v.
Bhikha
Cal-
lianji
40,
4r,
Ramabai v.
Bai
Mani ...
12R
Rukhmini
v.
Bai
Mangal
..
7S
Sheo
V
Ratanji
79
,,
Ujjri
V.
Patel
Purshotam
Budha
3
Baji
V
Venubai ...
...
1
0
Bakubai v.
Manchabai...
3
65,
166
Bala^'. Balaji
114
Balabux
v
Rukhmabai..
144,
148
Balaji
V.
Datto
63
Balaji
7/. Krishnappa
...
...
159
Balaji
V
Nana
116
Balasu
Gurulingaswami v.
Ba-
lasu
Kamalakshmama
60,
65
Balgir
z.
Dhondgir
... 63,178
Balkishendas
7; Ram
Narain.
82,
149
V.
Savitribai
...
160
Balkrishna
2'.
Gopal
29
V.
Hari
144
V.
Luxman..
..
167
V.
Moro ...100,
106,
119
,,
Ramchandra
v.
Ja-
nardan
Vishnu
...
104
Balmakund
v.
Bhagwandas
...
126
Balvantrao
v.
Bayabai...
...
66
Balwant Singh
%'.
Rani Kishori
96
Bank
of
Hindustan
v.
Prem-
chand
Roychand
126
Bapuji
V.
Pandurang
...
137,
183
Barlow
v.
Orde
...
...
4
Baroda
Sundari
t/.ouiq
bandhu
27
Barot
Narain
v.
Jesang ...
69
Basappa
u
Rayana
...
...
16
Basava
v.
Lingangavda..
65,
74
Basu
V.
Basu
52
Bashotiappa
v.
Shivlingappa...
62
Bawany
v. Ainbabhoy...
71,
154
Bayabai
v.
Bala
...
57, 58,
61
Becha
v.
Mothina 138
Bechar Bhagwan
v. Bai
Lak-
shmi 192,203
Beerpertab
Sahee
v.
Rajendra
Pertab
Sahee
214
Behari
Lai
v.
Madho
Lai
...
191
V
Shiblal
... ...
67
Beni
Parshad
v.
Puranchand...
189
Bepin
Behari
v. Brojonath ...
74
Berhampur,
The
Case
...
59,
72,
74,
213
Bhagirthibai
v.
Kanhujirao
14,
95,
165, 166,
186,
187,
204
Radhabai..
... 63
Bhagubai
u
Tukaram...
...
62
Bhagubatti
v.
Chowdhry
Bho-
lanath
189
Bhagwan
Das
v.
Rajmul
5,
61,
62
Bhagwan
Dallabh
v.
Kalashan-
ker
213
Bhagwan
Singh
v.
Bhagwan
Singh 12,
64
Bhagwan
Singh
t;.
Kallu
...
182
Bhagvvanta
z>.
Sukhi
..
...
196
Bhartpore
State
^
Gopal
Day
154
Bhaskart;. Brijlal
119
V. Mahadeo
...
...
187
V
Naro
Ragunath
...
63
Fhau
Abaji
y.RaghunathKrishna.
xx,
186,202
Bhau
B
abaji
u
Gopal...
...
190
Bhavani
v
Mahtap
Kuar
...
164
V
Maharaj
Singh
...
35
Bhima
v.
Dulappa
...
...
35
Bhimappa
v.
Basawa ...
...
73
Bhimawa
v.
Sangawa...
...
61
Bhivrao
v.
Shitatom
... ...
99
Bhoba
Tarini
v.
Peary Lall
...
125
Bholanath
Roy u
Rakhal
Das
175
BhoobunMoyee'y.RamKishore
56,73
Bhugabatty
Prosonna
Sen v.
Gooroo
Prosonno
Sen ...
217
Bhujangrao
v.
Malojirao ...
161
Bhujjan
Lai
v.
Gya
Pershad
...
181
Bhuli
V.
Nanalal
SI
Binda
v.
Kaunsilia
...
...
46
Bindajee
Luxman
wMathurabai
xix,
79
Binduman v.
Radhamani
...
35
Bireshwar
v.
Ardha
Chunder...
72
V.
Lachmissur ...
119
Bisso
Nath
Chunder
v.
Bama
Soondary
Dassee
220-
Boisni
V.
'vup Singh
...
...
154
Boologam v.
Swornam ... 95
Brij
Indur
Bahadur Singh
v.
Rani
Janki
Koer
201
Brijlal t;.
J
iban
Krishna ...
192
Brindavan
v.
Radhamani ...
162
,,
Chundar
v.
Chan-
dara
Kurmakar
...
...
35
Broja
Bhukan
Lai
v.
Bichan
Dobi
181
Bulakhidas
v.
Keshavlal
...
165
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
12/264
Vlll
Chanbasappa v.
Cholawa
...
94
Chandania v.
Shaligram
69,195
Chandika
Baksh
v-
Muna
Kuar
19,
168
Chandra
v.
Gojra
73
Chanvirappa
v.
Danava ...
138
Chatlerhhooj v.
Dharamsi
93,1
14
Chenava
v.
Basangauda
...
66
Chengami
Nayudu
v.
Muni
Sami
...
...
...
...
13G
Cbhaganlal
v.
Bapubhai
...
150
Chhag-anram
v.
Motigavri
...
196
Chiilainbara
Mudaliar
v.
Koothaperumal
... ... 105
Chiddu
V
Naubat
...139,189,204
Chimnaji
r.
Dinkar
...
...
190
Chinnaininal
v.
Varadarajula...
37
Chinnamm.il
v.
Venkata
... 174
Chinna
Ummaji
v.
Tegarai
...
20
Chinnayya
t;
Peruman
...
114
Chintamanrav
t;.
Kashinath
...
103
Chitko
V
Janki
...
62,74
ChoUoo
Misser
v.
Jemah
M
..
195
Chandrabullee,
Case of,
... 72
Chunilal
v.
Ramchandra
...
122
Coleman,
In re,
...
125,126
Collector
of Gorakhpur
v.
Palakdhari Singh
19
Collector of Madura
v.
Mootoo
Ramalinga .
.
...
... 59
Collector of
Masulipatam
v.
Cavaly
Venkata
...
176,186
Collector of
Pirhoot
v.
Huropershad
... ...
75
Collector
of
Surat
v.
Dhirajsingji
... .. ...
C2
Collector
of
Thana
v.
Hari
Sitaram
93,129
Court
of
Wards
v.
Kupulmun
Singh
181
Cursundas
^;.
Vundravandas...
217
Dadaji
v.
Rakhmabai
46
Dagai
Dabee
v Mathura
Nath
126
Daj^du
V.
Balvant
...
...
27
Dagdusa
v. Ramchandra
...
28
Dagree
7;
Pacotti ...
...
4
Dahee
Ch^ran
Mitra
v Radha
Charan
M
...
40
Daji
Hanmant
v.
Dhiraj
Ram
83,99
Dalel
Kunwar
v.
Ambika
Partap
Singh
...
...
155,
188,
190
Dalihai
v.
Gopibai
...
...
82
Dal
)at Naiotam-y.
Bhagwan... 187
Damodardas
v. Uttamram
98, 138
139,
141
Dandayya
v.
Chenbassappa
...
123
Dasarthi
Kundu
v.
Bipin
Bihari
208
Dattagiri
v.
Dattatraya
...
130
Dattatraya
Vithal
v.
Mahadaji
Parashram
...
... ... 141
Daulata
Kuari
v.
Meghu
Tiwari
153
Dawood
V.
Wullubh
29
Debi
Dutt
v.
Jadu
Rai 105
Singh
V.
Jia
Ram...
... 105
Deen
Dayal
v.
Jugdeep
Narain
106,
109,
110,
139
Degambery
v.
Taramony
...
71
Deoji
V
Shambhu
...
...
106
Deoki
(Mt.)u
Sookdeo
...
167
Deo Kishjn
v
Budh
Prakash
181
DeSilva^y.
DeSilva
...
...
25
DeSilva
u
Pestonji
...
...
18
Devi Pershad
v.
Gunvanti
Koer
152
Prasad
v.
Thakur
Dyal
158
Dharaj
Singh
v.
Manga
Ram ...
191
Dharm
Das
v.
Shamsoonderi.
.
140
Dharam
Singh
v.
Angan
LA...
107
Dharm
Das
Panday
v
Shama
Soondari
Dasi
...
...
97
Dharmodas
v.
Nistarini
Dasi...
126
Dharnidhar Ghose, re
...
...
45
Dharup
Nath
v.
Govind
...
15i>
Dholidas
v.
Fulchand
...
... 43
Dhondo
v.
Ganesh
...
...
159
Dhondo
v.
Gangabai ... ...
172
V.
Narayen
...
...
28
Dhondo
v.
Raoji
... ...
122
Dhondshet
v.
Raoji
29
Dhupabai
v.
Champalal
...
66
Dinanath
Mookerjee
v.
Gopal
Chunder ...
160
Dinkar
zj.
Appaji 99,
117,
119
V.
Ganesh
...
(51,72
Divan
Ran
Bijai
v.
Inderpal ...
26
Dnyanoba
-y.
Radhabai
...
58
Dulari
z;.
Vallubhdas
42
Durgabibi(Mt.)'z;.
Janki
Pershad
178
Durga
Sundari
v.
Surendra
Keshav
...
...
...
52
Durvasulu
Gandharudu
v.
D.
Narasammah
...
...
95
Dwarkanath 7;.
Baroda
Parshad
217
,,
Bysok
V.
Mahen-
dra
Nath
181
Empress
Prankrishna
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
13/264
IX
Fakirappa
v.
Chennappa
...
120
V.
Fakirappa
]37,12
V.
Yellappa
...
lf>0
Fakeerchand
u
JVlotichand
...
110
Faizuddin
v.
Tincowri ... 58
Fakirgauda
v.
Gangi
... 37,
39
Fatesingji
Jaswantsingji v.
Kumar
Harising
Fatesingji
5,154
Fatmabibi
v.
Advocate
General
of
Bombay
124
Fatu
V.
Dhondi
.. ...
5
Fazulbhoy
Vishram
v.
Sada-
nand
Trimbak ...
...
11
Gadadharbhatz*.
Chandrabha-
gabhai
... 193,204,213
Gadgappa v.
Appaji
...
...
91
Gajpat
V.
Chinaman
... ... 156
Gajapathi
Nilamani
v.
G.
Ra-
dhamani
... ...
...
139
Gandhi
Maganlal
v
Bai
Jadhav
186,
210,
213
Gane.sh
Lala
v.
Bapu
...
...
83
Ganesh
Waman
v.
Waghu
Rajaram
...
...
...
173
Ganga Bai
v.
Anant
...
...
63
Ganga
Baksh
v. Jagat
Baha-
dur
127
Ganga
Bisweshwar
7;.
Pirthee.
114
Jati
^ Ghasita...
165,211
Gangabai
v.
Ramanna
...
140
Gangabai
v.
Wamanji ...
115, 121
Ganga
Sahai
v.
Lekhraj
Singh
12,
13,
15,
23, 51,
66
Ganpat
v.
Adarji
28
V.
Annaji
98
V.
Gopal
Rao...
136,
143
Ganpatrao
v.
Ramchandar
...
123
Ganpat
Singh,
In
the
matter
of
41
Garurudhwaja
v.
Saparandh-
waja
...
21
Gandappau
Girimallappa
56,
57,
73
Gawri
V.
Shivram
64
Gandapuri
v.
Chatarpuri
...
177
Ghana
Kanta
Mohunta
v.
V.
Kuntoo
Lai
105, 107
Girianna
Murkundi
Naik
v.
Giriappa
v.
Ningappa.
Giriowa
v.
Bhimaji
Gitabai
v.
Shivbakas
Gobind
Krishna
v.
Qayyum
71,
160
58,
64
19,
177,
178
Abdul
...
16
Gobindamanee
Dasi
v.
Shyam
Lai
11)4,
195
Gobinda Pillai
v.
Thayyammal
196
Godavaribai
v.
Sagunabai ...
152
Gojabai v Shahajirao ...
35
Gonrend
v.
Collector
of
Mon-
ghyr
181
Goolab
V.
Rao
Kurun...
... 194
Gopal
V.
Gangaram
... ...
29
,,
V.
Hanmant
...
15,
63
,,
V.
Vishnu
...
o2,65
Gopal
Anant
v.
Narayen
Ganesh
...
...
...
52
Gopal
Das
v.
Badri
Nath
xix,
100
Gopal
Das
u
Damodhar
...
178
Gopal
Prasad
v.
Raghiinath
18,
115
Gopalayyan
v.
Raghupatayyan. 20
Gopalsami
Chetti
v,
Aruna-
chalam
Chetti
...
36,155
Gopikabai
v.
Dattatraya
...
155
Gosain
Doulatgir
v.
Bissessur
130,
177
Goverdhandas
v.
Ram
Kuar
Bai
125
Gosami Sri
Girdharji
v.
Raman
Lalji
130
Gosavi
Sivgir
v.
Rivett
Carnac
219
Gour
Chowdrain
(
Mt.
)
v.
Chummom
Chowdhry
...
158
Goverdhandas
v
Ram
Kuarbai
125
Government
of
Bombay
v.
Ganga
17
Govindarajlu
v.
Deverabhatta
32,117
Govind
Krishna
v.
Sakharam
Narayen
...
...
...
105
Greedharee
v. Nandkishore
...
178
Green
Chunder
v.
Mackintosh
1
08
Guntur,
the
case
...
55,
60,
72
Gurulingappa
v.
Nandappa
...
87,
120,147
Gurusami
u
Chinnamanrao
...
103
Guruwayya
v.
Dattatraya
...
100
Haebatrao
v.
Govindrao
...
65
Hanmant
v.
Bhimacharya
52,
158
Hanmantappa
u
Jivabai ...
124
Hansapore
case,
the
141
Hansraj
v.
Bai
Moghibal
191,209
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
14/264
Hari
v.
Gopal
145
V.
Jayaram
...
HI
Haribhat
v.
Damodarbhat
...
1(^
Hari
Chintaman
Dixit
v.
Moro
Lakshman
...
214
Hari
I ayal
Singh
v.
Grish
Chunder
Mukerji
203
Hari
Gobind
v.
Akhoy
Kumar
'27
Harig-obind
v.
Dharam
Singh
162
Harilal
-y
Bai
Mani^
114
V
Nagar
Jairam
...
30
Harilal
v.
Pranwallabhdas
...
193
Harjivan
u
Narain
Haribai
...
12G
Hari
Narain
v.
Ganpatrao
...
144
Harsaran
v
Nandi
165
Harry
Mohun
v.
Ganesh
Chunder
191
Himmatsing
Becharsing
v.
Ganpatsingh
153
Himnath
Bose,
Re
80
Hirabai
v
Lakshmibai
...
94
Honnamma
v.
Timmannabhat..
152
Honnappa
v.
Narsappa
...
26
Hoymobutty
Debia
v.
Koosoma
Moyee
Debia
156
Hula
Savitri
v.
Hula
Narayen..
153
Hunooman
Pershad
v.
Mt.
Babooee
...
104,117,190
Hurdey
Narain
v.
Rooder
Perkash
106
Hurpurshad
v.
Sheo Dayal
...
18
Hurrydoss
v.
Uppornah
...
195
Illata Saitri
7>
I.
Narayan
...
151
Inderun
v.
Ramasawmy
35,
37,
154,
162
IndurKuarz^.
Lalta Prasad
191,
194
Isri
Dutt
V.
Hansbatti
188,
189,
194
Isri
Sing
v.
Ganga
... ...
21
Issurchundra
v.
Gopal
...
27
Issur
Chunder
t;.
Ranee Dann
182
lyah Pillay's case ...
...
55
Jagadamba
V
Dakhina
...
69
Jagadesh
v.
Shivpratap
...
160
Jagannath
v
Mannulal
\
99
Jagannath
v.
Ramabhadra ...
141
Jagannath v. Sitaram
...
...
120
Jagannath
Prasad
v.
Ranjit-
singh
35, 69
Jageshwar
Narain
v
Ram-
chandra
Dutt
...
...
93
Jaikissendas
v.
Harikissendas...
34
Jairam Naranji
v
Kuverbai
...
218
Jaisinghpalsingh
v. Bijayapal-
Jamiatram
v.
Parbhudas
108,
109
Jamna
v.
Machulsahu
13
Jamnabai
v.
Khimji
...
..
217
Jamnabai
v.
Raichand...
56,
65
Jamnadasu
Allu
Maria
97,
111
Jamnadas
v
Ramantar
...
xx,
193
Jamshetji
N.
Tata
v.
Kasinath.
82
Janki z).
Nandram
...92,
151,
152
Jankibai
v.
Sundra
... 166,
186
Janki
Dabi
v
Gopalacharya ...
130
Janki
Pershad Agarwala,
case
of ... . .. ...
43
Janardhan
v.
Anant
...
...
145
Janardhan
Pandurang
u
Gopal
182
Jas
Ram
v. Shersingh
...
100
Jatha
Naik
v-
Venkatappa ... 192
Jayanti
Subbiah
v.
Alamalu
Manjamma
...
...
...
110
Jijoyimba
Baiji
v.
Kamakshi
Boyji
139
Jivabhai x.
Vadilal
... ...
135
Jivalal
Sing
-y,
Ganga
Prasad...
119
Jivi
V.
Ramji
...
...
155,
156
Jivabai
?;.
Krishnaji
...
...
146
Jogendra
v.
Nityananda
137,
161
Jogendra
Chunder
v.
Fulku-
mari
150
Jogendranath
v.
Jugo
Bahadur.
144
Jogul
Kishore
v-
Shib
Sahai
...
135
Joharmal v.
Eknath...l03, 105, 106,
107
Joshy
Assam, Re
... ...
80
Jugdanund
v.
Kessab
Nund
...
177
Juggernath
Roy
v.
Kishen
Pershad
129
Jugjeevan
v.
Deo
Shankar
127,
190
Jugjivandas
u
Imdad
...
...
114
Jugjivandas
Karamchand
v.
Brijdas
Lalji
221
Jugmohundas
v>
Mungaldas 18,
91,
92,
134
Jummalapadi Kalidas
v.
Atta-
pari
Subramania
...
... 79
Jumoona
v. Bama Soondari ...
194
Jussoda
Koer
v.
Sheo Prasad...
93
Kalee
Chunder
v.
Shib
Chunder ... ... ...
66
Kalee
Sankar
Sanyal
v.
Din-
endra
Nath Sanyal
... ...
147
Kalicharan Pal
v Rasiklal
...
26
Kalidas
7).
Kanhyahal...
...
126
Kalidas
-y.
Kishen
...
...
137
Kalidas
Das
v.
Krishna
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
15/264
XI
80
25
151
157
20
195
129
81
148
151
72
163
137
21
65
152
Kalloor
Narain
Sawmy,
Re
...
Kally
Mohun
Lai
v.
Bholanath
Kallu V.
Kaunsilia
Kalu
V.
Kashibai
Kamalakshi
v.
Ramasami
Kamanadhani
-y
Joysa
Kamini
Dasi
v.
Ashutosh
Mukerjee
Kamaraju
v.
Secretary
of
State
Kamta
Prasad
v.
Sheo
Gopal..
Kandasami
v.
Dorasami
136,
V
Murugammal...
Karamsi Madhowji
v.
Karson-
das
Natha ...
Karan
Singh
v.
Bhup
Singh
105,
106
Kariyadu
v.
Kayat
1
Karsandas
v-
Ladkawahoo ...
72
Karuppai
Nachiar
v.
Sankara-
narayanam
Chetty
...88,
HI,
211
Karupanan
Chetty
v.
Bulokam
Chetti
Karuppa
Gaunden
v.
Kumara-
sami
...
V.
Shivajiram
Kashibai
v.
Tatya
Kabturbai v.
Shivajiram
Kattamma
Natchiar
v.
Raja
of
Shivaganga
...
138,145
Kery
Kolithany
v.
Monee
Ram
57,
186
Kesarbai^;.
Bai'Wallubh...l67,
172
Keshav v
Govind ... 56,
73
Keshav
Bhat
v
Bhagirthibai...
128
Khaggendur
v.
Shampgir ...
177
Khetramoni Dasi
i,
Kashinath
Das
153
Khemkor
v.
Umiashanker ...
47
Khimji
Jairam
z'
Morarji
...
126
Khodabai
t;.
Bahadur
...
...
167
Khudiram
v.
Bonwari... ...
79
Khushal
Chand
v.
Bai
Mani
...
44
Kirty Chunder
v
Anath
Nath
141
Kojiyadu
v,
Lakshmi
167
Kooldeep
Narain
Sahee v.
Wooma
Coonara
...
...
125
Koonj
Behari
Dhur
v.
Prem-
chund
Dutt
203
Kotrabasappa
^
Chenviraya
...
203
Kripal
V.
Sakurmoni
162
Kribhna
v.
Parameshwari
65,
66
V.
Sami
...
...
137
^
V. Vasudeo
... 118,
132
Krishnaji
t;.
Moro
...
^5
V.
Pandurang
14,
157
Krishnanath
v.
Atmaram
...
12&
Krishnaramayya
v.
Vasudeo
...
119
Krishnarao
v.
Benabai
.
126
Krishnarao
v.
Shankarrao
...
57
Krishna
Reddi
v-
Thambu
Reddi
10^
Krishnasami
v.
Rajagopalu
98,
141
V
Ramasami
...
103
Krishnayya
v.
Chinaya
...
104
V.
Pichama
...
173
Krishnayan
v
Muthusami
137,
162
Kristayya
v.
Narasimhan
...
144
Krodesh
Sen
v.
Kamini
Mohun
Sen
179
Kuar
Sen v.
Mamman
21
Kulpanath
v.
Mewah
Lai
...
146
Kumara
Asima
Krishna
Deb
v
Kumara
Kumara
Krishna
1
eb
....
219
Kumara
Velu
v.
Virana
Govin-
dana
1^^
Kumaran
v.
Narayana
48
Kunjan
Chetty
v
Siddu
Pillai
106
Kuppa
V.
Dorasami
...
...
129
Kusam
Kumari v.
Satya
Ran-
jana
/
^^
Kutti
Ammal
v.
Radha
Kri-
shna
^72
Kuverji v.
Moti
Haridas ...
82
Kuar
Mardan
39
95
Lachman
Singh
Lachmi
Kuar v.
Debi
Prasad
Lakshman
Dada
Naik
v.
Ramchandra
Dada
Naik
213,220
Lakshman
Darka
v
Narayan
147
Lakshmandas v.
Dasrat
...
123
Lakshman
x>.
Jamnabai
...
9&
V.
Ramchandra
...
H*
V.
Satyabhamabai...
154.
Lakshmakka
v.
boggaramania
220
Lakshmappa
v.
Ramappa
15,61
65,71
Lakshmi v.
Kalliansing
V.
Subramanya
Lakshmibai
v
Ganpat
Hirabai
Radhabai
Rajaji
V.
V.
V.
V.
V.
V.
35,46
...
74
138,
212
...
189
...
58
...
56
Ramchandra
51,52,67
Saraswatibai
...
73
Shridhar
...
79
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
16/264
Xll
Lal,151
Lala
Narain v.
Ramanuj
...
81
Lala
Surju
Prasad
v.
Golab
Chand
105,10fi,107
Lali
t'.
Murlidhar
...
69,195
Laliit
Singh
v.
Raj
Coomar
...
139
Lalla
Beiiary
Dutt z;.
Thacko-
mony
Dassee
...
... 29
Lallubhai
t;.
Kasibai
170
V.
Mamhorbai
14,170,171
186,220
Lallu
Bhugwan
v.
Tribhowan
Motiram
103
Lalta
Kuar v.
Ganga
Bishan
..
151
Lasting-
V
Gonsalves
...
4
Leake
7*.
Robinson
...
...
125
Lekhrajkuar
u
Mahpal
...
21
Limji
V
Bapuji
...
124
Lingappa
v
Esudasan
154
Lloyd
V
Webb
219
Lobo
V.
Britto
...
27
Luchman v.
Akhbar
21
Luchman
Lai
v.
Kanhya
Lai...
69
Luxman
%)
Saraswati
...
108,
109
Ljixman
Bhau
v.
Radhabai
190,
194
Lux
mi V.
Dada
Raoji
.
172
Luxumanmammal
v-
Tiruven-
gada
Mudali
172
Madhavarao v.
Gangabai
...
154
Madhevrao
Manohar
v.
Atma-
ram
Kashav
141
Mahadava
Siddhantau
Venkata
Ramanuja
28
Madho u
Kamta
177
V.
Kolhar
121
V.
Meherban
... ...
121
Mahableshwarbhat
v.
Durgabai
61
Mahabir
Prasad
v.
Basdeo
Singh
103
Mahadeo
Balwant
t'.
Lakshman
138
Mahadeo
Pandit
v
Bordamo...
127
Mahadevappa
7^.
Basgovvda
116,118
Maharajah
of
Benares
v.
Ram
Kumar
Misser
104
,,
Mahtab
Chand
v.
Mir
Dad
Ali
128
Maharanee
Braja
Soondari
v.
Rani
Lutchmee
Kumaree
...
128
Sri
Mahmed
v.
Radha
Krishna ...
121
Mahammad
Askari
v. Radhe
Ram
98
Mahomed
Siddick
v.
Haji
Ahmed
5
Mailathi
Anni
v.
Subbaraya
...
5
Malikarajana
Prasad
v. Durga
P
,. ...
155
Malkarajuna
v
Narhari ...
118
Mana
Vikrama
v.
Rama
Patter
21
Manbhari
v
Naumidh
...
126
Mancharam
v
Pranshankar
129,142
Mancherji
Pestonji
v.
Narayan
213
Mandakini
v.
Adinath
...
53,
57
Mangaldas v.
Ranchhordas
...
221
Mangaldas
v
Tribhoovandas
126
Manickchand v.
Jagatshettani
57
Manick
Chanderu Bhagobatty
65
Manicklal
v.
Munchershah 129,
131
Manilal
v.
Bai
Rewa
166,
187,
210
Manila),
In
re,
78
Manjamma v.
Padmanabhayya
126
,,
V.
Sheshgir
Rao 19,
63
Manjunath
v.
Kaveribai ...
64
Manjanatha
v
Narayana ...
144
Manmatha
Natha
Biswas
v.
Rohili
Moni
Dasi
... xx,
194
Manoher
v.
Balvant
... ...
106
Mknohar
Ganesh
v.
Luxmiram
1
28,
129
Mansha
Devi
z;.
Jivanmal
...
150
Mari
v
Chinnamal
...
...
167
Maruthamuth
Nadan
v
Shri-
nivasa
Pillai
...
...
191
Matangini
Dasi
v.
Jogendra
Chunder
Mallick
157
Matangini
Gupta
v.
Jogesh
Chandra ...
46
V
Ram
Ratan
165
Mathura
Naikin
v.
Esu
Naikin
19
Mayaram
v.
Motiram
Govind-
ram
192
Mc.
Dowell
&c.
V.
Ragava
Chetty
103
Melaram
Nadial
v. Januram
Bawan
...
...
...
37,
39
Mhalsabai
v.
Vithoba 53,
65
Miller t)
Rangnath
...
119
Minakshi
v.
Ramanada
...
64.
V.
Virappa
214,
2
2o
Mirza
Jehan
v.
Badshoo
Eahoo
95
Mitakunath
Audhicarry
v.
Neerunjun A.
...
...
142
Mohandas
-y. Krishnabai
...
173
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
17/264
Xlll
Mohidin
v
Shivlingappa
...
21
Mohima Chunder
v.
Durga
Monee
203
Mahindro
v.
Shoshee ... ...
143
Mohori Bibi
v.
Dharmodas
81,
82,83
Mohunt
Bhagwan-y.
M. Raghu-
nandan
...
...
... 52
Mohunt
Burm Saroop
v.
Kashi
Jha
130
Mount
Madhav
Ban
v.
Hari
Krishna
... ...
178
Ruman Dass^'.
M.
Ash-
bul
Dass
178
Mokhoda
Dassee
v
Nandu Lai
158
Mokoond
Lai
v.
Ganesh
Chun-
der
140
Mokoond
Lalsing
v.
Nobodip
Chunder
80
Mokundo
Lai
v.
Bykunt Nath
160
Morali
Mahomad
v. Sheink Ram
189
Morarji
z;.
Nanabai
...
217
Moro
Vishwanath
zi.
Ganesh
90,
147
Mosha
Levi
v.
Jevvanmal
...
4.0
Motilal V.
Ratilal
193
Motivahu
v.
Purshottam
...
25
Muchoo
V.
Arzon
...
...
79
Muddun
Thakoor
v.
Kantoo
Lai
106,
107
Mudoosoodan
Mookerji
v.
Jadub
Chunder
...
...
44
Mulchand
v.
Budhia
...
15,
44
Mulji
v-
Gomti
'^
...
...
41
Mulji
V.
Kursondas
186
Mulji
Bhaishankar
v.
Bai
Ujam
152
Mungniram
v.
Mohant
Guru-
sahi
83
Munnoo
Lai
v. Gopee
Dat
... 212
Munshi
Buzloor
v.
Shamsoo-
deen
...
46
Murarji
Gokaldass
v.
Parvati-
bai
180
Murarji
Vithoji
v.
Mukund
Shivaji
...
...
,,.
14(?
Murugayi
v.
Veeramakali
...
165
Muthuswami
v. Simambeda
...
173
Mattammal
v. Kamakshy
...
157
,.
V.
Venga
Lakshmi-
ammal
... ...
...
1(57
Muttayan
Chetti
v.
Sangili
95,
105
Myna
Bayee
v
Aootaram
...
4
Mysore
Dasappa
v.
Chikama
80
Nadiya
Raja
Case,
The
... 212
Nagalinga
Nagamma
v
Virabhadra
... 153
Nagappa
y,
Subba
Shastri ...
52
Naginbai
v.
Abdulla
...
...
25
Nahalchand
v
Bai
Shiva
... 47
V.
Hemchand
...
171
Nallappa
v.
Ballammal
138,
147
Namasivayan
v.
Annami
Ammal
43,44
Nam
Narain
Singh
v.
Ramun
Pandey
128
Nanabhai
v. Janardhan
...
43
V.
Nathubhai
...
144
Nanchand
v.
Bapu
... ...
29
Nand
Kishore
7;
Ahmad
Ata...
27
Nanomi
Babuassin
zi-
Madden
Mohun
106,
107
Narain
u
Laving
Bharathi
20,
164
V.
Rakhal
Gain
39,
162
Narain
Chunder
v.
Dataram
122
Narain
Rao
v.
Ramabai
150,
152,
1.56
Narasappa
t;.
Sakharam
...
157
Narayan
v
Changalman
...
95
Narayan
v. Chintaman
...
129
V.
Jessang
195
V
Nana
Manohar
61,
97
V.
Nathaji
...
143, 147
V. Pandurang
...
144
V.
Political
Agent
of
Sawantwadi
111,
I19
V.
Satwaji
...
,.,
28
,,
V.
Venkatacharya
...
104
Narayan
Jagannath
Dixit
v.
Vasudeo
Vishnu
Dixit
... 141
Narayan
Maga
z^.Vasteva
...
192
Narayan
Sami
v.
Sami
Das
...
103
Narayanasami
v.
Mangammal
xix,
XT L
^
.
^7,
59
Narhar
Govind
v
Narayen
...
fi3
Narhar
Moreshwar
v.
Waman
Rao
iij
Narendra
Nath
v.
Bhupendra
119
Narendra
Nath
v.
Ram
Gobind
...
...
^
gg
Narmadabai
v.
Mahadeo
...
124
Narotham
v.
Nanka
...
,,[
46
Narottam
v.
Narosandas
...
212
Nathaji
Z-.
Sitaram
...
11*7132
Nathu
z>.
Jamni
292
Nathu
V
Ramdas
41
Nathu
Bhai
v.
Javher
Raiji
4*6,
47
,f
t'
Mulchand
28
83
Nathu
Piraji
t,
Balvvant
..
'82
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
18/264
XIV
Nawroji v.
Perozbai
94
Neel
Kristo
Dass
v.
Beer
Chunder
Thacoor
...
96
Nelson
v.
Stocker
83
Nidhomoni
Debia v.
Saroda
Pershad
...
...
...
72
Nihal
Kuar v.
Jayawantrao
...
58
Ningareddi v.
Lakshmawa
...
114,
123,
153
Niranjun
Barthee
v.
Padarath
Barthee
177
Nittanand v.
Sreekurun
...
18
Nobin
Chander
v-
Dokhobala...
25
Nobo
Kishore
v.
Hari
Nath
...
191
Nogendra
Nandini Dossi
v.
Benoy
Krishna Deb 204,
211,
217
Nugendar
v.
Kaminee... ...
192
Nundlal
v.
Tapeedas ...
...
40
Nursing
Narain
v.
Bhutto
Lall
66
Onkar
Narayan,
In
re
...
165
Padaji
Rao
v.
Ramrao ...
66
Pahaladsing
v-
Lakshmana-
buty
143
Paigi
V
Sheo
Narain
...
...
46
Panchappa z'.
Sanganbasawa.
62,
79
Pandiya
v.
Puli...
...
...
162
Pandit
Ram
v.
Maulvi
Muham-
mad
26
Papamma
v.
V. Appa
Row
...
62
Pappama
v.
Pappawayangar...
107
Parameshwar
v.
Bisheshwar ...
159
Parashara
Bhuttar
v.
Rama-
raja
...
55
Parbati
v.
Jagadish
...
...5,
19
Parbati Bibee
v.
Ram
Baran
Upadhya
217
Pareman
Das
v.
Bhatta
Mahton
103
Pareshmari
Dasi v.
Dinanath
Das
183
Parot
Bapalal v.
Mehta Hari
Lall
173
Partab
Narain
v.
Subhao Koer.
214
Parvati v.
Bhiku
104
V.
Ganpatrao
...
...
117
V.
Thirumalai ... 137,
163
Parvathy
Ammal
v.
Sundura
Moodely
123
Patel
Vandravan
v.
Patel
Mani
Lall 60, 62,
153
Payappa
u
Appamma...
56,
73
Peddayya
v.
Ramalingam
...
143
Periasamy Mudaliart;. Sitaram
Pershad
Singh
v.
Chedee
Lall...
196
Pitambar Ratansey
v. Jagjivan.
42
Ponnusami
v.
Dorasami
...
5
V.
Thatha
123
Ponnayyagounden
v.
Mootoo-
gounden
...
...
...
122
Poppama
v
Pappawayangar...
107
Prafulla
Chunder
Mullick
v.
Jogendra
Nath
Sreemony
...
218
Pranjiwandas
v.
Devakuwarbai
203
Pranpati
v.
Puran
Kunvvar
... 195
Pranvallabh
v. Deocristin
...
70
Prem Chand
v.
Hulas
Chand
..
153
President,
&c.
of
the
College
of
St.
Mary
Magdalen,
Oxford
V.
The
Attorney-General
...
130
Promotha Dossee
v.
Radhika
Pershad 128
Prosunno
Kumari
v.
Golab
Chand
129
Pudma Kumari
v. Court of
Wards
56,
73
Pudumorkee
v.
Rangeemonee.
150
Punna
Bibee
v.
Radha
Kishen
Das
138
Puran
v.
Lalji
... ...
... 26
Purnanundas
v.
Venayekrao
Vasudeo
217,218
Purushottam
v.
Atmaram
...
144
Purushottamdas
v.
Bai
Mani... 46
Purushotamdas
v.
Purushot-
tamdas
...
... ...
41
Pusi
V.
Mahadeo
Prasad
...
47
Q.
V.
GovERDHAN
Rajbunsee.. 45
R. V.
Bezonji
...
...
...
7q
Rachawa u
Kalingappa
... 171
Radhabai
v.
Damodhar ...
74
Radhabai
u
Ganesh ...
... 213
Radha
Mohan
v.
Hardai Bibi...
65
Raghubans
Kunwar
v.
Bhag-
want
Kunwar
... ... 156
Raghubanund Dass
v.
Sadhu
Churn
Dass
136
Raghunada
v.
Prozo Kishore...
59
Rahi
V.
Govinda
...41, 162,
163
Rahimatbhai
v. Hirabai
... 5
Rai
Charan
Pal
v. Peari
Monee
194
Rai
Narasinga
v.
Rai
Naraina.
140
Raj
Bahadur
v.
Achambit
Lall.
69
Raj
Kishore
v.
Govind
...
180
Raj
Lukhee
Dabea
v.
Gokool
Chunder
Chowdhry...
192,
194
Raj
Rup
Singh
v.
Baldeo
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
19/264
XV
Raja
V.
Subbraya ...
...
ISo
Rajaram
v.
Ganesh
...
...
127
Raja
Bishen
Perkash
-y.
Bawa
Misser
142
Raja
Valanki
Venkata
Krishna
Rao
y
Venkata
Rama
...
73
Raje
Nimbalkar
v.
Jayawant
rao
...
...
...
...
66
Rajendra
Narain
v.
Saroda
...
53
Rajendra Dutt
v.
Sham
Chund
Mitter 140,
217
Rajendra
Nath
v.
Jogendra
Nath
74
Rakhmabai
v.
Radhadai
5
7,
61,
73
Rakhmabai
v.
Tuka Ram ...
167
Ramabai
v.
Raya
... 52,
68
V. Rangrao
...
...
195
,,
V.
Trimbak
...
151,
154
Ramalinga
v.
Sadashiva ...
63
V.
Virupaksha ...
140
Ramamani
Ammal
v.
Kulan-
thai Nauchiar
...
..
36
Ranianarasia
v.
Sambayya
...
155
Ramanarasu
v.
Buchamma
...
153
Raman
Lalji
Maharaj
v.
Gopal.
142
Ramanna
v.
Venkatta...
...
123
Ramappa
Naicker
v.
Sitammal
160
Rama
Rao
v.
Raja
Rao
...
68
Rama
Sami
v. Narasamma
...
167
Ramasami
v.
Sellattammal
...
191
V.
SundaraHngam...
71
V. Alagiris&mi
...
140
Ramasami
Ammal
v.
Kulanthai
Nauchiar
...
36
Ramasami
Ayyar
v.
Venjida-
sami
Ayyar
...
124
Ramasami
Chetti
v.
Alagiri-
sami
Chetti
...
144
Rambhat
u
Luxmon
...
79, 115
u
Ramasami
...
139
V.
Timmayya
41,
42
,,
V.
Trimbak Ganesh
Desai
152
Ramchandra
v.
Anantacharya..
144
V.
Audit
Sen
...
42
,j
V.
Fakirappa
... 105
V.
Mulji
GO
V.
Nanaji
...
G3
Ramchandra
Vishnu
Bapat
v.
Sagunabai
...
...
...
152
Ramdhan
Ghose
v. Anund
Chunder Ghose
140
Rameshwar
v.
Lachmi
Prosad.. 135
30
128
177
105
13S
154
220
153
167
Ramlal
Set
v.
Kannialal
...
125
Ramnad
Case,
The
...
59,
73
Ramphal
Rai
v.
Tulakuari
...
191
Ramsaran
Garain
v.
Tekchand
137
Ram Chandra Mukerji
v.
Ranjit
Singh 126,
217
Ram
Chandra
Sen
v.
Audit Sen 42
Ram
Connoy
v.
Johur
Lai
Dutt
Ram
Coomar
y.
Jogendar
Ram
Das
Byragee
v.
Ganga-
dass
...
Ram
Dayal
v.
Durga Ram
Ram
Josh
i
?>.
Lakshmibai
Ram
Kuwar
v.
Ram
Doy
Ram
Lai Mukerji
v.
Secretary
of
State
Ram
Narain
Singh
v.
Peary
Bhagat
127,203
Ram
Nath
v.
Durga
Sundari...
175
Ram
Nath
v.
Rajonimomy
Dossy
Ram
Nath
Jalapatrai
V'
Durga
Sundari Debi
Ram
Parshad
v.
The
Court of
Wards
141
Ram
Pershad
v.
Sheo
Churn ..
140,
143
Ram
Pershad Singh
v.
Lakh-
pali
Koer
Ram
Ratan
Singh
v.
Sheo
Nandan
Singh
Ram
Sahye
v.
Lalla Lalji
Sahye
Bhugat
Ram Sami
v.
Venkatesam
Ram Saran
v.
Teckchand
Ram
Saran
Singh
v.
Mt. Ban
Peary
Ram
Soondar
Roy
v.
Ram
Sahye
Bhagat
Ran Bijoy
Bahadur Singh
v.
Jagutpal
Singh
Ranchhoddas
ri.
Parv^atibai
...
Rangamma
v
Atchama
Ranganayakamma
v.
Alwar
Setti
Rangaswami
v.
Krishnayya
...
Rangayyana
^^
Ganappa
Rangayya
Chetti
v.
Thanika-
challa
Ill,
182
Rangilbai
v. Vinayak
...
...
190
Rango Balaji
z\
Mudiyeppa ...
IgO
Rango
Vinayak
v.
Yamunabai
152
Rangubai
v.
Bhagirthibai
146
83
182
180
162
26
181
182
217
52
53
121
121
63
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
20/264
XVI
Raoji V.
Balwant
Raoji
7).
Gang-adhar
Baoji
V.
Luxmibai
V.
.Mahadeo
Rassick
Lall
Dutt
v.
Chittan
Churn
Dutt
...
Ratna
Masari
v.
Akilandam-
...
27
119
.
52,
56,
74
...
26
mal
Reg
V.
Karsan
Goja
..
Reg
V.
Nesbit
...
Rindabai
v.
Anacharya.
69,
172,
17,
Rindabai
v.
Girdharlal
Rivett
Carnac
v-
Jivibai
Roshan
Singh?;.
Balwantsingh.
Roy
Bahadur
v.
Bishan
Dayal.
Rudappa
2;
Irawa
...
172,
Rukhldl
V.
Chunilal ...
71,
Rungo
Monee
v.
Kashinath
...
Rupa
Jagshet
v>
Krishnaji
Govind
Rupchand
v
Rakhmabai
62,
72
Russahai
v.
Zulekabai
Russick
Lai Dutt
v.
Chittam
Charn Duttt
Rassul
Jahan
v.
Ram
Saran ...
Rutnasubba
Chetti
v.
Ponappa.
Sadashiv
v.
Dhakubai
212
195
37
80
204
79
189
154
3
187
160
87
218
,
73
167
212
164
173
121,
190,
194
V.
Hari
...
...
77
V.
Sitabai
167
V. Sitaram
...
...
106
Baiza,
137,
162,
163,
166
143
Sadu
V.
V
Rama
...
Sangawa
v.
Rangangowda
Saguna
v. Sadashiv
Sahadur
^y.
Rajwanta
...
Saithri,
Re
Sakharam
v.
Devji
V-
Govind
...
V. Hari
V.
Ram
Kalad
Vithal
154
V.
Sitabai
14,
171,
172
V.
Sitaram
...
Bowa
V.
Ananta
164
173
46
80
111
103
147
106
Sakumari
Melia
52
Sangappa
v.
Vyasappa
...
73
Sanjiyi
v
Jalajakshi
...
... 20
Sankaralingam
v.
Subba
Chetti
30,
37,
47
Santan
V.
Janku
...
...
94
Saodamini
Dasi
v.
The
Admi-
Sarada
Prasad Ray
v.
Maha-
nanda
Ray
... ... ...
97
Saral
Chand
v.
Mohan
Bibi
...
83
Sarkies
v.
Prosonamoy
... 4
Sartajkuari
v.
Deorajkuari
74,
115
Savitribai
v
Luxmibai
155,
157
Seetal
v.
Madho
...
115,
124
Sellam
v.
Chiniammal .,
...
139
Sengamalammal
v
Valayudu...
211
Seshamma
v.
Subbaryyudu
...
155
Sethrucharlu
Ramabadra
v.
S.
Virabadra
...
...
...
98
Sethurama
^
Ponnammal
...
173
Shaha
Kalidas
v-
Chudasama...
29
Shamawahoo
v
Dwarkavvahoo
58
Shama
Churn Adhicaree
v.
Roop
Dass
Byragee
...
182
Shambhu
Nath
v.
Gayan
Chand
193
Shambhu
Nath
v.
Gulib Singh
106
Sham
Lall
v.
Amerandro
... 26
,,
V.
Ghasita ...
...
99
Sham
Narayan
v.
Raghubar
Dayal
92
Shamsing
v.
Shantabai
...
62
Sham
Sundar
v.
Achhan
Kun-
war ...
...
...
... Ill
Sheo
Dayal
v.
Jadu
Nath
Te-
waree
... ...
...143, 146
Sham
Sundaree
v.
Jamona
...
195
Sheo
Partab Bahahur
Singh
v-
The
Allahabad Bank,
187,
198,
200
Sheo Pershad
v.
SatopLal
...
Ill
Sheo Prasad
v.
Kullundar
...
91
Sheoram Brahmachari
v.
Su-
brak
178
Sheo
Shankar
Lai
v.
Debi
Sahai
187,
189, 198,
210
Shersingh Rai
v.
Dakho ...
5
Sheshgiri
v.
Giriowa
... ..
163
Shet
Mulchand
v.
Bai
Mancha
193
Shib
Dayal
v. Jadu
Nath Te-
waree...
... ... ... 91
Shivagiri
v-
Alwar
Ayyangar...
110
Shivganga
Case,
The...
141,
161
Shivmurtappa
v.
Virappa
...
122
Shivram
v.
Ganu
...
...
123
Shomasoondari
v.
Jardine
Skin-
ner and
Co. ...
...
...
135
Shridhar
u
Hiralal
... 43,44
Shridharnidhar
v.
Chinto
...
72
Shrinivas
v-
Hanmant
...
69,
195
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
21/264
xvii
Sikki
V
Venkatasamy
151
Sitaram
v.
Chintaman...
...
1^6
V.
Sitaram
...
...
129
Sitaramayya
v Venkataramanna
104
Sivananjana
v
MuttuRamalinga
20
Sivaya
Pillai
v.
Munisawmi
...
82
Soiru
Padmanabh
v.
Narayen
Rao
117
Sojan
V.
Roop
Ram
... ...
4
SokhanadhaVanimundar
v.
S.V.
xix,
88
Soma
Charun
v.
Rup
Dass ...
125
Somi
Shankar
v
Rajeshwar ...
IfiS
Sonaluxmi
v
Vishnuprasad
...5,
40
Sonatun
Bysack
v.
Juggut-
sundaree
...
128,
129,
215,
217
Sonu
V.
Dhondu
...
83,
99,
138
Soogan Chand
(i.
Gopalgir
...
177
Soorajkoomar
v.
Mahadeo
Dutt
177
Soorjeemoney
t;. Deenobundo...
188
214,
215
Soorlah
Dossee
v.
Bhoobun
Mohun
Neoghy
189
Soudamini
Dossee
v, Jogesh
Chunder
Dutt
138
Sri
Mohunt
Govind
Rao
v.
Sitaram
...
...
..
95
Sri
Narain
v.
Guru
Prasad ...
9(i
Srinivasammal
v.
Vijayammal..
213
Sri
Pal
Rai
v.
Suraj
Bali...
139,
204
Sri
Raghunadha
v.
^ri
Brojo-
kishore
...
... ...
73
Sri
Raja Rau
Venkata Kumara
Mahipati
Surya
Rau
v.
Sri
Raja Ram
Chellayamoni
...
220
Subba
Ayyar
v
Ganesh Ayyar.
135
Subba
Reddi
v.
Chengalamma. 195
Subbarayer
v.
Subbammal
...
62
Subba
Raya
v.
Rajaram ...
144
Subbayya
v.
Subraya
...
...
213
V. Suraya
...
... 115
Subramania
Ayyar
v,
Arumu-
gam
Chetty
... ...
... 82
Subrahmanayan
v.
Venkamma
60
Subrahumanayam
Chetty
v.
Arunachallam
Chetty
...
189
Subrayya
v.
Sadashiva
...
147
Sukhbasi
Lai
v.
Guman
Singh
74
Sundar
v.
Khuman
Singh
...
17
V. Parbati
l-tO
Snndari
v
Pitambari
xx,
165
Sudarsam
v.
Narasimhalu
...
97
SunJaralingasami
v. Ramasami
Sundariammal
Subramanlar
32,
44
Sundrabai
v.
Jayawant
...
29
Suppammal
v.
Collector of
Tanjore
...
... ...
128
Suraj Bansi
Kuar
v.
Mahipat... 195
V.
Sheo
Per-
shad
...
...
110,114
Suraneni
Venkata
Gopala
Narasimha Roy
v.
Sura
Neni
Lakshmi
Venkata
Roy
...
I46
Suraya
v.
Lakshminarasimma
168
Surendra
Keshav
z.Durgasoon-
dari
54,72,217
Surendra
Nadan
v.
Sailjukant
Das
59
Surmust Khan
v.
Kadir
Dad
Khan
4
Surti
V.
Narayandas
... ...
l8l
Suryanarayan
v.
Venkatara-
mayya
56
Syamananda
Das Mohipatra
V.
Ramkant
Dass
...
...
160
Tagore
Case,
The
125.
216,
220
Tara
Churn
v.
Ganesh
Chun-
der
73
Tarakisen
Royt*.
Soshi Shikhu-
reshwar
Roy...
...
...
220
Tara
Naikin
v.
Esu Naikin
...
19
Tekait
Mon
Mohini
v.
Basanta
Kunwar
... ... ...
45
Thakur
(Mt
)
v.
Rai
Baluk
Ram
192
Thakurain
Balaraj
Kunwar
v.
Rai
Jagatpal
Singh ... ...
168
Thayam Pillai
v.
Subba
Pillai..
138
Thayyammal
v.
Venkatara-
mayya
...
...
56,
195
Tilakchand
v. Jitmal
103
Tilak
Chunder
v.
Shama
Cha
ran
183
Timbai
v.
Krishnaji ...
...
145
Tipperah
Case,
The
... ...
161
Tirumamagal
T).
Ramaswami...
181
Toolsey
Das
Ludha
v.
Premji..
220
Totawa
v.
Basawa ...
166,
211
Travancore
Case,
The
...
59
Tribhowandas
^).
Gangadas
...
126
,,
V
Yorke
Smith.
94
Trimbak
v.
Narain ...
...
144
V.
Narayen ...
...
103
Trimbakpuri
Guru Sitalpuri
v.
Gangabai
177,
178
Tukaram
v-
Babaji
...
...
65
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
22/264
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
23/264
ADDENDA.
P.
ip,
add
after
para
4
It
is
of the
essence of family
usages
that
they
should
be certain,
invariable
and
continuous,
and
well
established
discontinuance
must
he
held
to
destroy
them. Where, however,
such
a
custom
has been
proved,
the
onus is upon
the
party
who alleges
the
discontinuance
thereof
to
prove
that
fact.
But
such
a
discontinuance
was
held
not
to
be
established
by
one
instance in
which a
female htvlng
no
title had
usurped
possession of
the
family
property
and
had
then gone
through
the
form of making, by
way
of
a
compromise,
a
gift
of
it to the
rightful
heir,
there
being
other-
wise
clear and
consistent evid-nce of
the
existence of
the custom.
Sarabjit
v.
hidarjit, 27 All,
203.
P.
57,
add to
line
25
after
5 Bom. H.
C.
E.
181
And
such
an adoption
cannot
be
impeached
on the
ground
that
it
has
the effect
of
divesting the estate
of
the
junior
widow
or
her
infant
daughter.
Narayansami
v.
Mangammal,
28
Mad.
315.
P.
59,
line
3
add after
Sapindas
The
consent
of
kinsman
is
required
on
account
of
the
incapacity
of
women
to
act
rather
than
to
procure
the consent
of
all
whose
interests
will
be
defeated
by the
adoption.
Narayanasami
v.
Mangammal,
28
Mad.
315.
P.
79,
after line
3
A
guardian
of the property cannot be
appointed
for
a
minor
whose
only
proprietory interest is as coparcener
with
adults
in
joint family
property.
Gharib-ul-lha
v.
Khalak
Singh,
30 I.
A. 165,
5
Bom.
L. R.
478. But
this
principle
will
not
apply
^where
all
the coi^arceners
are minors and a
guardian
of
the
property
is
appointed
for
tlie
whole
number.
Binadjee
Luxman
v,
Mathurabai,
7
Bom.
L. E. 809.
P.
88,
add
to
line
3,
see
Sokkanadha Vannmnndar v.
S.
V., 28
Mad.
344.
see
also
the
observations
of Cbandavarkar,
J.,
in
Vadilal
v.
Shah
Khiishal,
27
Bom. 157
at
160,
161
;
4
Bom.
L. R.
968.
P.
loot
add
after para
i
But
where
a
contract
is entered into
on behalf
of
a
joint
family
business
by the
managing
members
of
the
firm in their
own
names
it
is
not
necessary
that
any members of the joint
family
other than those
who
entered
into
the
contract
should be parties
to a
suit
brought
thereon
;
the
managing
members
are
in the
position
of agents
for undisclosed
principals.
Gopal
Das
V.
Badri Nath,
27 All.
3^)1.
P.
154,
add
after para
i
Under
the
Hindu
law
as
well
as
upon
general
principles,
the
father
of
an illegitimate
child
is bound to
provide
for
its
maintenance.
A
suit
lies
in
the
Civil
Court
for
maintenance
of
an
illegimate
child
notwith-
standing
an
order
of the Magistrate,
under
section 488
of
the
Crimiual
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
24/264
XX
p.
165,
add
at
the end-
Where
a
Hindu
married
woman
embraced
Islamism
and
married
a
Mahoraedan
according
to
the
forms
of
Mahomedan
law,
and had
sons
by
him
durinij
the
lifetime
of her
Hindu
husband wiihout
having
been
divorced
from
the
latter
:
it was held
that
as
the
sons
were
illegitimate,
she
was in
the
position
of
-.m
unchaste
daughter,
and
was,
under
Hindu
Law,
disqualified
from
inheriting
her
father'd property. Sundari
v. Pitambari,
32 Cal.
871.
P.
186,
line
3,
from bottom,
add after
Mitakshara
Subject
to
the
general
control
of
the
husband
on
all
stridhan
property,
except
Saudayika.
Bhau
Ahaji
v.
Raghunath
Krishna,
S.
A.
218 of
1905.
Decided
10th
October
1905.
P.
193,
add
after
para
2
Ordinarily a
gift
by
deed
or
will
by
a
Hindu to
his
wife
does
not
carry
the
absolute
interest
in
the
absence
of some
indication
of an intention
that
she
should
have such
absolute
interest
in
the
property.
Where a
conveyance
executed
by
a Hindu transferring
certain property
to
his
wife,
after
reciting
that
the
executant was
in
possession as
proprie-
tor
of
shares in
certain
villages, declared
that
he of his own free
will
transferred
the
share
of
which
he
was
proprietor
to his wife and
put
her
in
projirielary
(malikana)
possession
authorizing
her to retain
possession
of
the
same
as
proprietor (raahk).
together with
land
revenue,
miscellane-
ous
items,
&c.
Then came
this
provision
:
In case
of
proper
neces-
sity
she
as
my representative is
at liberty
in
every respect to
transfer
the
property
by sale
or
mortgage,
either
in
my
life-time
or
after my
death.
No
objection
taken
by
any
person shall
be
held
as
fit to
be
allowed
in
this
respect
it
was
held that
notwithstanding
the use
of
the word
malik,'
the
docu-
ment
did
not
c
'ufer
an
absolute power
of alienation
on
the
donee, but
she
was
not
empowered to
transfer the
property
either
by
sale or mortgage
unless
a
legal necessity
arose
for
doing
so. Jamna Das
v.
Ramantar,
27
All. 364.
P.
194,
line
17
add
after
3
f.
A.
72
Manmatha
Nath
Biswas
v.
Rohilli
Mont Dasi, 27 All.
406,
P.
202>
add
before last
para,
3
linen
from
bottom
*'
She
cannot
will
a^vay any
property which
she takes
as
stridhan,
even
as a
daughter, without
her
husband's
consent,
except
in
the
case
of
Saudayika.
Bhau
Abaji
v.
Raghunatk
Krishna,
S.
A.
218
of
1905,
decided
10th October
1905.
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
25/264
HINDU
LAW.
]*)()()
K
I.
INTRODUCTION.
I.
The
Expression Hindu
Law, its
analysis and justification:
Lav, or, Po.sitirc
Liar
acconlino-
to
Western .Jurists
(and
es])eciallv
Henthani
and Austin) is
a
conmiand
issued
liy
a
Sorercif/ti^
who
is
po-
litically
supei-ior,
to
siihjcrts
who
are
politically
inferior,
imposino- an
ohlio-ation
or
Duti/,
attended by
a
penalty or
Sanctiitn
in case of
breach
or
disobedience
and
the
capacity of an
individual
to
draw
down the
sanction
of
the
State in
case
of neo-lects
or l)reaches
of
duty is
called
that
person's
Right.
It is
this
element
of
enforcement
by
a
Sovereign
or Political
authority
which
distinguishes,
according to
Austin,
Positive
Law
from
all
other
rules
whether
enforced
by
a
determinate or indeterminate authority; and Hindu
Law
being based
on
the
compositions
of Private individuals
or on
Divine
Commands,
the
accuracy of
the
Expression
Hindu
Law has been
questioned
by
modern
Jurists as being
wanting
in the
Political
sanction
attaching to
it.
Austin's theory, however
has
to
be
applied
with
great
discrimination
and caution, and generally it
would not be
safe
to
apply
this test
to
societies
which existed and
had
their
own institutions
well-established and
matured,
even
long
before
Austin's theory was
launched forth; and
even
in
modern
societies,
its
application
cannot
be universal
as the
whole mass
of
International
Jurisprudence
will
have to
be
called
mere
opinion Improperly
Called Law.
The
true
character
of
Hindu Jurisprudence
is in fact
different
from
that of
the
European
system
.
The obedience
to
The
true
character
'
of
Hindu
Jurispru-
the
Smritis
etc.,
was not
due to
any
political
ence.
authority of
their
authors, but
the
veneration
in
wliich
they
were
held by
those
for
whom
these
writings were
intended.
Tliese
lawgivers
sliowed
admirable
practical
good
sense
in
prescribing
rules.
While
apparently
professing
to
follow
the
Divine
Laws
and
Commands
as
found
in the
Yedas
and
claiming
simply
to
interpret
and
explain
them
to
the
general
public,
in
reality
they
so
moulded
these
texts
as
to
bring
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
26/264
(
2
)
secured
them
a
following
and
ohedience
whicli
was
as
universal
and
strong- as
tliat
secured
by
a political
authont>
.
The
developement
of
Hindu
Law
in this
way may
well
he compared
with
English
Equity
and
Roman
Praetorian
Legislation
which
had
to pass through
similar
stages of
formation.
But
the
expression
Hindu
Law
can
even
stand the
test
of
Western
Lawyers
if the true origin
of
the Laws is
properly
borne in
mind.
In
the
East,
as well
as
the West,
it
is
never the King
or
Sovereign
or
Political
Superior
who
composes the
Laws himself,
but
it
is
only
with
his
signature
and
seal
that
the
Laws
which
are
otherwise
composed
l:)y
private
individuals are issued
to
the world with
the
Political
Sanction
imx)rinted
on
it. There
is
only
one point wherein the two
systems
differ.
For,
whereas,
in
the
West,
the authors
compose
the
Code
by
an
authority
previously
given
for
the
purpose,
in
the
East,
the political
mark
is
affixed
to
the
writings which
])robably were
commenced and completed
at
the
individual
wish
of a
private person, but
subsequently
obtained
political
sanction
and
thus came
to
be
laws
by
ratification
subsequently
given.
The
commentary of
aTT^T^
on
^Is =f5^^'if^^%
is
a
very strong
instance of
this, even
if
the ordinarily known
fact of
Ihe universal
authority of
the
^'jirT
evidencing
their due promulgation
h>-
persons
in
authority
be
ignored
altogether.
n.
Nature
and
Scope
of
Hindu Law:
l/A.
Nature:
The
authority
of these
Sanskrit
Lawyers is,
however,
not
of
universal
a]j])lieation. It
only
aflected
or
was
meant
to
affect
the members of the
four
castes.
It
did
not
extend
to
the
aboriginal
tribes
that
existed
in India
prior
to
the advent of
the Aryan
settlers. Indian
Law
may
in
fact
he affirmed
to
consist of
a
very
g-reat
number
of local
bodies
of
usage,
and
of one set of
customs
reduced
to
writing,
pretending
to
a
diviner authority
than
the
I'cst,
exercising
consequently
a
great influence
over them,
and
tending,
if
not
checked,
to
absorb
tliem.
/According
to
Mi-.
Mayne,
(1)
Hindu
Law
is
based
upon
Jnv:
memoria] cnstonis, which existed
prior
to,
and indepen-
Mr.
Mayne'sview.
dent of,
Hrahmanism.
(2)
When
the Aryans penetra-
ted into
India, they
found
thei-e
a
number
of
usages
either
the same
as
or not wliolh
uidikc
theii-
own.
('.])
They accepted
these
with
or without
modifications,
I'cjccting
oidy those
Avhich
Avere
inca])able
of
being
assimilated,
such
as
Polyandry,
incestuous
marriages,
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
27/264
tht'v
Juiiiid
lliein,
without attaching'
to
tliein
any
religious signiticancc.
(.5)
Tlic religious
element
snbse [iiently grew
up,
entwined
itself
with
leg-al eonce])tioiis,
and then
distorted
itself in
three
ways: (a)
Ly
attri-
buting
a
pious
pur])Oseto
aets
of
a
])urely seeular
nature,
(Aj
by
clog-
ging
these
aets
witli rules
and
i-estrietions
suitable to the pious
purpose
and
(()
by
gradually
altei'ing the
customs
themselves,
so
as
to further
the
special
objects of
religion
or policy,
favoured by
Brahmanism.
^l)istinctiYe
features of
Hindu
Law:
The most
distinctive
fea-
jK^'-T^'
tures
of
Hindu
Law
are
(
I)
The
undivided family
system,
(2)
the
-^
order of
succession and (o) the
]>iactice_
of
adoptioii.'
^^Tn
all these
cases,
remarks
MrrTTayne, '^'it will
be
satisfactorily
shown
that
Brah-
manism has
had nothing
to
do
wliatever with
the
early
history of those
branches of
the
law
;
that these
existed
independently of
Brahmanism
or
even
of
Aryanism, and that where
the
religious element
has entered
into, and
remodelled
them,
the
change
in this direction has
been
abso-
lutely
modern.
B.
Scope:
The
Hindu
Law
undoubtedly
applies
to
those
who
follow
the
Brahminical religion
/.
r.,
^T^R^tr
^^T: f:5aT^rrftj??''?TTrT%^NcT
I
Yajnavalkya L
2,
those who believe in
the
authority of
the
Vedas,
samhitas,
smritis
etc.
But it would hardly
be
right
to
limit the
appli-
cation
of
the
law
to
boad-fide
followers
of
the
Brahminical
faith.
Besides those
wdio observe
Hinduism
as
a mere
matter
of
outward form
and
social
convenience^
there are
classes
ejj.
Brahmos,
who
do
not
obsei've
even
that
outward form and yet are
governed
by
the
principles of
Hindu
Law.
The term nuist therefore
be taken
to
include
not only
persons
who
are
Hindus
by i-eligion
but also the
descendents of
such
persons
who
are not
completely ex-communicated from
Hindu
society,
on
account
of change of religion.
Law
applicable
to
families
professing
two
religions:
Where
a
family
observed
l)0th
Hindu
and
Mahomedan
rites,
the
Allahabad
High Court
held
that
the Hindu Law
was
applicable.
Roij
Balnidiir
r.
Bishcii
Dai/
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
28/264
(
4
)
iL'lioioii
were
at
lil)ertv to
iviioimre the
riiiidii
Law or
adhere
to it.
Ahraliain
r.
Ahraluin,
)
M.
I. A.
11).')
: 1
W.K.P.C'.l.
But
now
tlie
Indian
Sneeession
Aet
ooverns
all
sueli eases.
l\>iuuis(iiiii
r.
Don/sai/ti.
2
Mad.
2()i.
Daf/irr
r.
Parotfl.
li) Bom.
783.
lint a
Hindu may
succeed,
under
the
Aet.
to
the
])ro])erty
of a
Clu'islian.
Admiiiisl
r(itor-(rciirr
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
29/264
-
8/11/2019 Gharpure.Hindu Law.pdf
30/264
(
6
)
Examination: Short
Summary:
A
Law
is
a
Command
issued
by
Political
superiors
or
SOVEREIGNS
to
Political
inferiors or
SUBJECTS,
imposing
