Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 1 · Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 2 Geotest Cover Letter (CL) Former 17-19...

Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 1

Geotest Cover Letter (CL)

Former 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW 28 May 2018 Our Ref. P30868.3_L01_rev1_CL

ABN: 39 089 302 009

PO Box 928, Kings Langley NSW 2147 P (02) 9671 4443

E – [email protected]

28th May 2018 Ref. P30868.3_L01_rev1_CL MOHO Developments Pty Ltd ATT: Simeon McGovern Level 5, 9 Help Street Chatswood NSW 2067 Re: Cover Letter; Updated property identifier due to recent subdivision registration; former ‘17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields’ at 72 Junction Road, Schofields (Lot 2051 in DP 1234896) NSW. This cover letter (CL) has been prepared for the property currently identified as 72 Junction Road, Schofields NSW (Lot 2051 in DP 1234896) as shown within the insert below –

Image source SIXMap (https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/) accessed 28th May 2018.

This CL has been prepared subsequent to a recent subdivision and registration of the property. The property, as it is identified today was formerly identified to form part of the former 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields properties (former Lots 205 & 206 in DP 1189773). Geotest has previously prepared a Remediation Outcomes Report (ROR) for the formerly identified property, the report reference is as follows:

• P30868.3_R01_rev1 Remediation Outcomes Report, 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW, dated 3rd January 2018 (GTS ROR_rev1 2018).

The report is applicable to all land areas as identified within the Section 1 and corresponding Figure 1 of the GTS ROR_rev1 2018, provided as an attachment to this letter.




Geotest confirms the validity of the GTS ROR_rev1 2018 report, where applicable to the portions of land described and identified as the recently registered ‘72 Junction Road, Schofields NSW’ (Lot 2051 in DP 1234896).

If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the below Geotest representative.

For and on behalf of Geotest Services Pty Ltd,

Alan Halpin Environmental Operations Manager

Via email – [email protected]

ATTACHMENTS

1. Client Supplied Subdivision Layout (showing Lot 2051 in DP 1234896)

2. Geotest Services Pty Lt ‘GTS ROR_rev1 2018’.




1. Client Supplied Subdivision Layout




2. Geotest Services Pty Ltd ‘GTS ROR_rev1 2018’

Geotest Services Pty Ltd 1

Remediation Outcomes Report

17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW P30868.3_R01_rev1

ABN: 39 089 302 009

PO Box 928, Kings Langley NSW 2147

P (02) 9671 4443

E [email protected]

3rd January 2018

Report Ref. P30868.3_R01_rev1

MOHO Developments

ATT: Simeon McGovern

C/-

Clearstate Development Co.

Level 1, 79-81 Chandos Street,

St Leonards, NSW 2065

Re: Remediation Outcomes Report; Following Demolition and Remediation; Lots 205 & 206 in DP 1189773; 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW 2762

1. INTRODUCTION

Geotest Services Pty Ltd (Geotest) were engaged by Clearstate Development Co. to carry out contaminated lands consulting

services including environmental validation works following the remediation of identified contamination at the site. At the time of

writing this report, the site comprises Lots 205 & 206 in DP 1189773, also identified as 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW.

The site early works also comprised demolition and clean-up of nominated site structures which were followed by inspection,

additional assessment and remediation works.

The report is specific to the areas assessed at the site as presented within the report. These works have been carried out to ensure

the future land use suitability for proposed residential re-development of the site.

The site locality can be found within Figure 1 presented as an attachment to this report.

2. OBJECTIVE

• The objective of these works was to assess for the presence of contamination beneath the former residential dwelling, sheds,

the general demolition work area and the nominated site features.

• The objective of these works is to assess whether identified contamination at the site has been successfully remediated.

• The objective of these works is to determine whether these areas may be considered suitable for the proposed residential

land-uses, and provide recommendations for any additional investigations required.

mailto:[email protected]




3. SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of works undertaken for this assessment included:

• Review of existing information;

• Liaison with the demolition and remediation contractor;

• Multiple visits to site;

• Environmental inspection and sampling works across demolition and remediation areas;

• Guidance of remediation works;

• Visual clearances for the presence of asbestos containing materials;

• Collection of environmental soil samples;

• Laboratory analysis; and

• Interpretation of laboratory results;

• Review of waste documentation;

• Interpretation and reporting.

4. PREVIOUS CONTAMINATION REPORTS

Geotest is aware of the following contamination reports relating to the site as listed below. Geotest has carried out a review of

these reports as part of these works.

4.1 Preliminary Site Investigation Report, 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW, Geotest Services

Ref. P30868.3_R01, dated January 2017.

The report presents the investigation results of a Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) undertaken by Geotest Services Pty Ltd

(Geotest) at the Site. This report was commissioned by Maurice Fitzpatrick of Clearstate Developments Co Pty Limited to address

development and planning requirements for the proposed medium density residential subdivision at the Site.

At the time of the reporting, the Site comprised two adjoining registered lots Lot 205 and 206 in DP 1189773, also identifiable at

17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields.

The objective of the investigation was to preliminarily assess for the likelihood of contamination to exist on the Site. The objective

was also to determine whether the Site would be suitable for future subdivision.

To achieve the objectives, Geotest undertook the following scope of works; review of available geology, hydrogeology and

topographical maps; review of historical aerial photographs; land title ownership record searches; NSW EPA contaminated land

register search; NSW Office of Water registered groundwater bore search (500m radius of the site); NSW EPA POEO records

search; review the Section 149 (2) planning certificates; conduct a site inspection to observe current site conditions and surrounding

land uses; interpretation of data and report preparation.

A review of the available historical data and observations made during the Site inspection indicate a number of potential areas of

environmental concern (AEC) and associated contaminants of potential concern (CoPC). These included former grazing and

farming uses, former market gardening, the footprints of a former structure, asbestos in soils contamination, areas of re-contouring

and filling and hazardous materials in site structures.

Geotest concluded that; based on the desktop investigation, site inspections and the observations made that the site may be

considered suitable for future sub-division from a contamination perspective subject to further investigation, remediation and




validation. This may be conducted during the re-development phase of works. We make the following recommendations for the

next phase of works:

• A Remediation Action Plan (RAP) is recommended to guide further investigation requirements and facilitate the remediation and validation;

• The identified remediation drivers during the preliminary investigation are for asbestos and potentially contaminated, uncontrolled fill.

• All demolition and remediation works should be undertaken by an appropriately licensed and experienced contractor

• Following the decommissioning of the two site septic tanks, an inspection by environmental consultant should be made for the suitability of surrounding soils;

• The site dam should be inspected following de-watering and an assessment of the sediment removed from the base prior to re-use at the site. Safe removal of any anthropogenic waste or debris (commonly found in farm dams) should be undertaken if encountered;

At any stage during the re-development, in the event that any contaminating materials or other un-expected finds (ie. additional

animal carcasses, burial pits) are identified during re-development, an appropriately experienced consultant should be engaged to

attend site. The works should cease immediately in the area of the discovery.

The report was prepared in conjunction with the documents limitations.

4.2 Remedial Works Action Plan, 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW, Geotest Services Ref.

P30868.3_R02, dated February 2017

The remedial works action plan (RAP) prepared by Geotest Services for Clearstate Developments Co presented the work strategies

and framework to be implemented during the remediation activities at the Site. The report was commissioned to address

remediation requirements associated with the proposed low density metropolitan style residential subdivision at the Site. The Site

was legally defined to include the registered lots, Lot 205 and Lot 206 in DP 1189773, also identified as 17-19 Schofields Road,

Schofields NSW 2762.

The objective of the RAP was to provide the required remediation work framework and stipulate validation requirements to assist

in the remediation of the site to render it suitable for use. To ensure the most suitable remediation strategy is derived to result in

complying land-use conditions for the proposed residential development.

The NSW DECCW (OEH) 2011 outlines the primary objectives of a remediation plan to render a site suitable for the proposed use

as;

• Negate any appreciable risk of human exposure to contaminated soils or groundwater;

• To halt the possible migration of contaminants at the site;

• To ensure the site is rendered suitable for the intended land-use.

The desired site land use is Standard Residential – with soil access as described in the NEPC NEPM Guidelines 2013 Amendment

No. 1; Schedule B1 – Guidelines on the investigation levels for soil and groundwater Table 1A(1) – Column A.

The RAP provides the recommended controls and framework for undertaking remediation activities at the site. These aim to render

it suitable for future residential land-use. Through successful implementation of the strategies outlined within this report the site

should be suitable for its intended land use.

The following table incorporated from the GTS RAP 2017 outlines the identified remediation areas at the site and the expected

remediation extents based on known contamination issues:




Source: Geotest 2017 RAP

GTS RAP 2017 Figure 3 ‘remediation areas & extent’ identifies the general locality of previously identified management areas at

the site. This figure has been extracted from the 2017 RAP and presented as an attachment to this report.

Additionally, as part of the works encompassing this report, additional areas of asbestos impacted soils requiring remediation and

validation were identified. These areas are described as lateral extension of the previously identified contamination and have been

managed concurrently with the ongoing remediation works.

Geotest makes the following comments and closing remarks relating to the information within the RAP for the proposed

development of 17-19 Schofields Rd, Schofields:

• All remediation works should be conducted by an experienced contractor whom holds the required licenses to safely complete

the works

• All demolition and HAZMAT works should be undertaken by a suitably licensed and competent DE-2 and AS-B (or AS-A)

contractor

• All stockpiled debris, junk and waste should be safely removed and lawfully disposed.

• Known visual remediation has been detailed in this report. All areas of known contamination should be appropriately validated

by an experienced consultant.

• The potential for contamination and unsuitable soils in other areas of the site is considered possible. During stripping and

excavation an environmental consultation should supervise the removal of all un-controlled fill materials.

The report was prepared in conjunction with the documents limitations.

5. UNEXPECTED FINDS

In addition to the known areas of contamination identified in previous reporting, asbestos related unexpected finds were identified

following the demolition and during the remediation preliminaries. The unexpected find comprised uncontrolled fill materials

beneath recently demolished structures, and within near surface soils surrounding the structures (including location of former




historically identified structure). The fill was observed to include Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) in a low to moderate

concentration. The unexpected find was located within the northern portion of the site which was the concentrated area of

demolition works. A solid waste classification assessment was undertaken by Geotest relating to the unexpected find, the following

report was prepared:

• Waste Classification Assessment, asbestos impacted soils; Lot [205 and] 206 in DP 1189773; 17[-19] Schofields Road,

Schofields NSW, Report Ref. P30868.4_L01, dated 8th November 2017.

The report provides the results of a soil classification assessment in accordance with the NSW EPA 2014 guidelines for classifying

waste. The soils addressed within this assessment have been identified during previous environmental investigations at the site

(Geotest Services Preliminary Site Investigations, Geotest Ref. P30868.1_R01) where these materials were identified to be

impacted by asbestos containing materials (ACM) at the surface. Geotest Services have previously prepared a Remediation Action

Plan (Report Ref. P30868.1_R02, dated February 2017) where the remediation option of off-site disposal was presented for

materials grossly impacted by ACM. Further, ACM was identified at the exposed surface following the demolition of above ground

improvements considered an unexpected find at the site.

Geotest stated the objective of the works were to provide a waste classification in accordance with NSW EPA 2014.

To achieve the objective, Geotest carried out the following general scope of works: Review of site setting and available site

information; Visit to site; A visual inspection of materials; Collection of soil samples; Laboratory analysis; and interpretation and

reporting in accordance with the NSW EPA Waste Classification Guidelines ‘6 Steps for Classifying Waste’ process.

Geotest collected and analysed 7 environmental samples for one or a combination of the following broad range of potential

contaminants:

• Metals (8) (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn);

• Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs);

• Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRHs);

• Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX);

• Organchlorinated Pesticides (OCP);

• Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB); and

• Asbestos Identification.

The following summary table of results was prepared for the assessment;

Analyte

Column 1, Table 1,

EPA 20141

Column 1, Table 2,

EPA 20141

Column 2, Table 2,

EPA 20141

Reported Maximum

Concentrations

CT1 TCLP1 SCC1 Eurofins (#570293-S & 570293-

AID)

All units are mg/kg unless otherwise reported.

Arsenic 100 - - 21

Cadmium 20 - - <0.4

Chromium (VI) 100 - - 23

Lead 100 - - 44

Mercury 4 - - <0.1

Nickel 40 - - 28

Total PAHs 200 - - <0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.8 - - <0.5




Analyte

Column 1, Table 1,

EPA 20141

Column 1, Table 2,

EPA 20141

Column 2, Table 2,

EPA 20141

Reported Maximum

Concentrations

CT1 TCLP1 SCC1 Eurofins (#570293-S & 570293-

AID)

Benzene 10 - - <0.1

Toluene 288 - - <0.1

Ethyl-benzene 600 - - <0.1

Xylenes (Total) 1,000 - - <0.3

PCBs <50 - - <0.5

Scheduled Chems2 <50 - - <502

TRH C6-C9 650 - - <20

TRH C10-C36 10,000 - - 52

Asbestos

Identification

Detect - - Detected

1Maximum [allowable] values / concentrations 2Maximum concentration is based on inferred CoPC and scheduled chemicals analysed

Results from the representative fragment of ACM described as compressed fibre cement building material analysed for the

presence of asbestos ‘PACM1’ reported a positive detection for asbestos within the sample. All soil samples analysed for the

presence of asbestos reported no respirable fibred detected at the laboratory limit of reporting.

The results of the laboratory analysis indicated that the samples reported concentrations of analytes less than the NSW EPA 2014

Waste Classification Guidelines Table 1, Column CT1 thresholds for General Solid Waste.

This information was also utilised to support the absence for any requirements of chemical remediation at the site, due to the

concentrations of analytes reported being below the remediation criteria (Geotest 2017 RAP).

Geotest referred the site 2017 RAP Section 5, ‘Remediation Strategy’ hierarchy option 2 for the excavation and of material and off-

site disposal at a suitability licensed EPA waste facility as the preferred remediation strategy, for management in conjunction with

the existing known contamination issues at the site.

The report has been attached to the end of this report for reference.

6. REMEDIATION & VALIDATION AREA SUMMARY

We have prepared the following table to summarise the remediation areas requiring validation within this report, contamination/

remediation drivers and their corresponding environmental samples:

Remediation Area Approx. Remediation Area

Remediation Drivers Corresponding Samples (range)

Area A ~1,200m2 Asbestos in near surface soils and chemical/asbestos clearance following demolition.

HM1, HM2, HM3, HA1-1 through HA1-6

Area B ~600m2 Asbestos in near surface soils and chemical/asbestos clearance following demolition.

SM1, SM2, SM3, SA1-1 through SA1-5, SAW-1, SAW-2, SAW-3

Additionally, areas outside of the required contamination remediation and validation areas above have been assessed within this

report by means of intrusive inspection, or by means of intrusive inspection, sampling and analysis to provide site characterisation




and validation of identified AEC. These areas are described as ‘former market gardening’ areas, fill ‘access ways’ and areas of

vacant lands where unidentified fill may be present (assessed generally as former market gardening areas).

7. SITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

To assist with assessment and validation works the following site investigation levels (SILs) have been adopted. These criteria

were adopted based on the following published guidance documents and from the RAP (2017):

• CRC CARE (2011), Health Screening Levels for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater, E Friebel and P.

Nadebaum, Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC

Care) Technical Report Series, no. 10.

• National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) 1999, Schedule B (1) Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and

Groundwater, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM), ISBN 0 642 32312 7.

• NEPC 2013, ‘National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 No. 1’ Federal

Register of Legislative Instruments F2013L00768.

• NSW DEC 2006, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd edition)' ISBN 1 74137 859 1,

Department of Environment and Conservation NSW.

• NSW DECCW 2010 ‘Technical Note – Decommissioning, Abandonment & Removal of UPSS’, ISBN 978 1 74232 518 7.

• NSW DECCW 2010 ‘Technical Note – Site Validation & Reporting UPSS’, ISBN 978 1 74232 193 6

• NSW EPA 1995, 'Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines', ISBN 0 7310 3756 1.

• NSW EPA 2014, ‘Waste Classification Guidelines Part 1’, ISBN 978 1 74359 798 9.

• NSW OEH 2011, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites', ISBN 0 7310 3892 4,

NSW Environment Protection Authority.

Geotest made an assessment of the site, its locality and soils groups to make a determination of the existing adopted site threshold

criteria for ecological environments. Geotest determined that the criteria as presented within the NEPM 2013 based on the site-

specific conditions (ie. Sand/clay/silt, or aged/fresh) is relevant for the site and continues to be adopted as the site assessment

criteria for the additional investigation works as part of this validation report.

Adopted Site Investigation Levels (SILs) Human Health Criteria

Given the intended use of the site is residential land use we have adopted the following guidance and make comment on selection

below:

• The health-based investigation levels (HIL) for residential with accessible gardens and soil land uses Column A in Table 1A

(1) NEPM 2013) have been adopted (HIL A).

• The Health Screening Levels for TRH from NEPM (2013), Low Density Residential (sand) provided in Table 1A (3) have been

adopted.

• The Direct Worker Exposure Health Screening Levels for TRH from CRC Care (2011), Low Density Residential (sand)

provided in Table B4 (for direct worker exposure only) have been adopted.

• The Soil Asbestos Criteria for Asbestos in Soils, Western Australia Department of Health (DOH) 2009 Guidelines

• The ecological investigation levels (EILs) (generic values based on soil type) for urban setting (80% protection) NEPM 2013

• The ecological screening levels (ESLs) for urban setting (80% protection) in Table 1B (6) NEPM 2013




Aesthetic Criteria

Given the historical use of the site it is possible that fill materials containing inert, non-hazardous foreign materials are present.

Although the preferred remedial strategy for the works is excavation and lawful off-site disposal, aesthetical criteria must be

considered.

Following remediation of known contamination, the site may be considered suitable for use from a human an ecological health

perspective, management of the aesthetic limits must still be considered. Whilst there are no specific numeric guidelines for

assessing aesthetic suitability a balanced approach should be taken. In the case of this site is it proposed for residential (HIL-A)

and as such we propose a higher expectation of soil quality is applied. General assessment of the soil aesthetic considerations

must be made and should consider:

• Chemically discoloured soils or large quantities of inert refuse, particularly unsightly, may cause ongoing concern to site users.

• Highly malodorous soils (ie. strong hydrocarbon odour, hydrogen sulphide odours etc)

• Large monolithic deposits (ie. non-hazardous ash deposits)

• Presence of putrescible refuse (which may also pose a potential human health risk)

• Soils containing residue from animal burial (which may also pose a biological human health risk)

• Depth of materials, including chemical residues, in relation to the final surface of the site.

• The need for and practicality of, any long-term management of foreign material.

• The presence of small quantities of non-hazardous inert material and low odour residue that will decrease overtime.

Additional caution must be exercised when assessing sensitive land uses.

Terrestrial Ecological Criteria

The NEPM 2013 provides a pragmatic and site-specific approach for EILs, considering a range of different soil characteristics –

opposed to a single type. EILs have been developed for selected metals and organic substances and are applicable for assessing

risk to terrestrial ecosystems. These generally apply to soils within the top 2.0m of soil profile and depend on specific soil

physicochemical properties, particularly in environmental sensitive areas such as riparian zones, wetlands or areas of state

environmental significance. In highly arid regions, consideration of EILs to 3.0m below final ground levels should be given.

NEPM 2013 also described Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs), which generally apply to the top 2.0m of the future soil profile.

The ESLs are specific to the intended land use and soil type; defined as coarse or fine grained.

In urban re-development settings, such as the site being investigated within this report, the use of specific EILs must be considered

relevant to the proposed future civil activities and unknown future placement of soils (vertically within the fill profile). By nature of

such civil re-development, significant vegetation will be cleared, topsoil will be stripped, stockpiled, homogenised and re-instated.

Therefore, if an EIL exceedance above the site criteria exists, it should be segregated (hot-spot removal) prior to widespread

stripping, quarantined and then placed at a depth >2.0m below the finished surface. This should be supervised and recorded by

the environmental consultant. Validation sampling following hot-spot removal is also required. However, under the remediation

hierarchy it is recommended that the actual treatment or remediation of identified EIL exceedances is the first method, with on-site

containment being the least favoured, particularly in sensitive land applications or ecological setting.

For reference and completeness of industry accepted guidelines we have included Table A1 from NEPM 2013 below for reference

(source NEPM 2013):

Table A1: Summary of the EILs for fresh and aged contamination in soil with various land uses. Presented ranges are the

EILs for a range of soil characteristics (overleaf).




Contaminant Age of contam

Added contaminant limits (mg added/kg soil) or EIL (mg/kg) for various land uses

Area of ecological significance3

Urban residential/ public open space4

Commercial & industrial5

Zinc1 fresh 7130 25500 45800

aged 15280 701300 1002000

Arsenic2 fresh 20 50 80

aged 40 100 160

Naphthalene2 fresh 10 170 370

DDT2 fresh 3 180 630

Chromium (III)1 fresh 2550 75160 120270

aged 60130 190400 310660

Copper1 fresh 1560 30120 45200

aged 2080 60230 85340

Lead1 fresh 110 270 440

aged 470 1100 1800

Nickel1 fresh 125 10170 20350

aged 595 30560 55960

Notes: 1 = the values presented for zinc, chromium (III), copper and lead are added contaminant limits (ACLs) based on added concentrations. The EIL is calculated from summing the ACL and the ambient background concentration (ABC). 2 = the values presented for arsenic, naphthalene and DDT are generic EILs based on total concentrations. Insufficient information was available to calculate ACLs for these contaminants. 3 = The standard protection level is 99% 4 = The standard protection level is 80% 5 = The standard protection level is 60%

8. SITE VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS

The known remediation areas should be visually and analytically validated for suitable residential land-use; following remediation

activities.

The following additional validation techniques should be implemented during works, in accordance with OEH 2011:

• The size and extent of the remediation excavation should be assessed by the consultant to observe for the presence of any

remaining impacted material. If required, the consultant may be necessary to instruct and guide further excavation.

• Validation samples should be collected both vertically and horizontally across any excavations. Both excavation walls and

floor should be validated. Generally speaking, it is accepted 1 sample per <10-25 lineal metres of excavation wall. General

industry practise on small excavations stipulates the collection of at least 1 sample per <50m2 of area. The samples should

be analysed for the targeted contaminants of concern. It is expected excavation wall samples are vertically collected at <1.0m

intervals or at any changes in soil type (ie fill/ residual). The validation wall samples should target the same depth / and or

material type as the original sample location.




• Where it is determined acceptable frequencies and sampling densities may be altered at the direction of the experienced

environmental consultant undertaking the validation, particularly if the ground surface comprises residual soil conditions.

• Visual clearance for the removal of contaminants should also be conducted during works.

• The site validation results should be compared with the proposed land use (Standard Residential with access to soil). The

site assessment thresholds for this land-use are provided in NEPM Amendment 2013 Table 1(a) Column A – HIL. Should any

exceedances above the criteria be reported; further excavation and subsequent re-validation should occur until the impacted

material has been adequately remediated.

• Validation of the aesthetic condition should also be assessed by the engaged validating consultant. Given the proposed

residential land-use NEPM 2013 specifies the soils must be suitable for residential land-use and not contain offensive odours

or visual staining. A consistent and clearly defined framework for odour measurement should be adopted by the validating

consultant.

9. DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIATION & VALIDATION ACTIVITIES

The following section provides a general description and summary of works undertaken to facilitate the remediation objectives.

The areas are identified in general accordance with those described in Section 6 above. The client engaged Corporate Demolitions

Pty Ltd (SafeWork NSW non-friable asbestos removal Lic# AD211382) in conjunction with Evergreen Earthworks Pty Ltd and DSA

contacting Pty Ltd to undertake the demolition and remediation works at the site.

‘former market gardening’ and ‘access way’ Areas

Geotest undertook a test pit inspection and sampling program at the site for the purposes of visual inspection and further visual

inspection including sampling and laboratory analysis within areas of no known contamination which have been described within

this report as ‘former market gardening’ and ‘access way’ areas. The areas were generally identified within the Geotest RAP to

require limited assessment to ensure validation of the subject site. The program was undertaken on the 27 th October 2017 using

a 5 tonne excavator. The following samples test pit locations were established during the works:

• C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6, C7, C8, C9, C10;

• DW1, DW2, DW3, DW4; and

• OBS1 through OBS12.

Of the above test pit locations, the following samples were collected and analysed for the corresponding analytes:

• C1-C2, C3-C4, C5-C6, C7-C8 One or a combination or Metals (8), Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCP),

Organophosphate Pesticides (OPP).

• DW1, DW2, DW3, DW4 Asbestos identification

Eurofins MGT Lane Cove (Eurofins), a NATA accredited laboratory for the methods used was engaged to carry out the analytical

assessment of representative samples collected in the field. The laboratory report Ref.# 570297 was generated.

The laboratory results reported that no asbestos was detected within the samples submitted for asbestos identification from within

‘former market gardening’ and ‘access way’, and that all samples analysed for metals (8), OCP and/or OPP reported concentrations

below the adopted site criteria HIL-A and relevant ecological criteria.




AREA A

• Area A comprises the former historically identified structure footprints, the former recently demolished structure footprints, the

former residential septic tank and stored general domestic styled wastes within vicinity (Part-Geotest 2017 RAP Area 3). Area

A further includes the unexpected finds consisting asbestos in shallow fill soils.

• Following the removal of the asbestos materials on the site structures, a clearance inspection was undertaken by Home

Demolitions Pty Ltd (HD), Asbestos Assessment competency (CPCCBC5014A) Michael Chidiac (Certificate No. 1138/2017)

on the 13th October 2017. HD issued an asbestos inspection clearance of the 13th October 2017. The inspection states that

all asbestos material had been removed in accordance with SafeWork NSW 2016 COP and that no asbestos materials were

identified visually and that the area was suitable for re-occupation. The clearance has been attached to the end of this report

for reference.

• Following the clearance of the structures, Corporate Demolitions Pty Ltd disposed a total of 2.38 tonnes of straight asbestos

off-site to SUEZ Waste and Recycling Centre, Elizabeth Drive Kemps Creek landfill on 16th October 2017.

• Following decommission of the sites septic tank in general accordance with the NSW Health Advisory Note 3 (2017) for on-

site demolition of septic tank and incorporating subsequent off-site disposal, an inspection of the former septic tank location

was made by an experienced Geotest consultant. The results of the inspection did not indicate any remnant overflow indicator

and the area was considered aesthetically suitable for residential land uses.

• Following the demolition of site structures, an initial inspection of the ground surface conditions was undertaken by Geotest

consultant. The results of the inspection indicated that various fragments of ACM were identified at the soil surface and within

the near surface fill soils present within the broader demolition area (intrusive inspections undertaken by means of excavation

with general purpose bucket of a 5 tonne mechanical excavator).

• A limited investigative test pit program was undertaken throughout the immediate areas exceeding the known Area A

clearance area to ensure lateral delineation, test pit locations and recorded observations presented within Figure 3 and test

pit summary logs presented as an attachment to this report.

• The nominated asbestos impacted soil materials were excavated, loaded into sealed trucks and disposed off-site to

Enviroguard Pty Ltd Mamre Road, Erskine Park Landfill on the 20th and 21st November 2017.

• Following suitable excavation and off-site disposal, a surface clearance inspection of Area A was conducted on the 21st

November 2017.

• Geotest did not observe any signs of asbestos contamination at the surface or within the soil sample locations (hand effort

excavated). Further, no signs of soil staining or discoloration were observed which would suggest the presence of chemical

contamination.

• Geotest collected 10 samples from the base of the excavations within the Area A (HM1 through HM3, HA1-1 through HA1-6).

The excavation did not generally have notable wall surfaces and thus not practical for wall sampling surrounding the

excavation, this is with exception to a limited excavation wall on the southern side of the excavation (approx. max 0.3m). One

wall sample (ASB1) was collected from the center of the small wall excavation face. Geotest scheduled analysis on selected

samples for one, or a combination of asbestos identification, metals (8), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Total

Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRH), Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX), OCP, OPP and/or Polychlorinated

Biphenyls (PCB). The samples were identified as:

▪ HM1 through HM3 (3 samples) (chemical)

▪ HA1-1 through HA1-6 (6 samples) (asbestos only)

▪ ASB1 (wall sample) (1 sample) (asbestos only)

• Eurofins MGT Lane Cove (Eurofins), a NATA accredited laboratory for the methods used was engaged to carry out the

analytical assessment of representative samples collected in the field. The laboratory reports Ref.# 573768 and 570293 were

generated.

• The laboratory results reported that no asbestos was detected within the samples submitted for asbestos identification from

Area A.




• All samples from Area A analysed for metals (8), PAH, TRH, BTEX, OCP OPP and/or PCB reported concentrations below

the adopted site criteria HIL-A and relevant ecological criteria.

AREA B

• Area B comprises the footprint of recently demolished structure, Part-Geotest 2017 RAP Area 3 and Geotest 2017 RAP Area

2. Area B further includes the unexpected finds consisting asbestos in shallow fill soils.

• Following demolition, asbestos impacted near-surface soils were excavated, loaded into sealed trucks and disposed off-site

to Enviroguard Erskine Park Landfill on the 20th and 21st November 2017.

• Following suitable excavation and off-site disposal, a surface clearance inspection of Area B was conducted on the 21st

November 2017.

• Geotest did not observe any signs of asbestos contamination at the surface or within the soil sample locations (hand effort

excavated). Further, no signs of soil staining or discoloration were observed which would suggest the presence of chemical

contamination.

• Geotest collected 8 samples from the base of the excavations within the Area A (SM1 through SM3, SA1-1 through SA1-5).

The excavation had a shallow and limited wall surface on the northern end of the excavation (<0.3m), and a shallow wall

surface along a majority of the southern end of the excavation (<0.4m). Wall sample ASB2 was collected from the northern

end of the excavation while SAW1, SAW2 and SAW3 were collected from the southern end of the excavation.

• Geotest scheduled analysis on selected samples for one, or a combination of asbestos identification, metals (8), PAH, TRH,

BTEX, OCP, OPP and/or PCB. The samples were identified as:

▪ SM1 through SM3 (3 samples) (chemical)

▪ SA1-1 through SA1-5 (5 samples) (asbestos only)

▪ ASB1 (wall sample) (1 sample) (asbestos only)

▪ SAW1, SAW2, SAW3 (3 samples) (asbestos only)

• Eurofins MGT Lane Cove (Eurofins), a NATA accredited laboratory for the methods used was engaged to carry out the

analytical assessment of representative samples collected in the field. The laboratory reports Ref.# 573768 and 570293 were

generated.

• The laboratory results reported that no asbestos was detected within the samples submitted for asbestos identification from

Area B.

• All samples from Area B analysed for metals (8), PAH, TRH, BTEX, OCP, OPP and/or PCB reported concentrations below

the adopted site criteria HIL-A and relevant ecological criteria.

10. SOIL SAMPLING & LABORATORY ANALYSIS

Soil sampling was carried out by the same experienced Geotest consultant on the 27th October 2017 and the 21st November 2017.

During each event, sampling was undertaken in general accordance with Geotest procedures, which are based on industry

accepted practice. A total of 34 sampling points were established during the remediation and validation works, the sampling points

include 26 primary sampling points and 4 composite samples each comprising 2 sampling points (total 8 points for composite

samples). The samples were collected following the demolition and remediation process. The samples were placed into laboratory

prepared glass jars and plastic zip lock bags using a clean pair of nitrile gloves. All samples were selected and scheduled for the

relevant CoPC laboratory analysis. A summary of the scheduled samples is listed below:

Date Collected Sample identification Sample Count Remediation Area

27/10/2017 C1-C2, C3-C4, C5-C6, C7-C8 four samples (8 points) Various, Site

27/10/2017 DW1, DW2, DW3, DW4 four samples Access Way

21/11/2017 HM1, HM2, HM3 three samples Area A

21/11/2017 SM1, SM2, SM3 three samples Area B




Date Collected Sample identification Sample Count Remediation Area

21/11/2017 HA1-1 through HA1-6 six samples Area A

21/11/2017 SA1-1 through SA1-5 five samples Area B

21/11/2017 SAW-1, SAW-2, SAW-3 three samples Area B

21/11/2017 ASB1, ASB2 two samples Access Way

The individual sampling locations have been identified on Figure 3 attached to this report.

11. LANDFILL DOCUMENTATION

Geotest were provided with weighbridge documentation relating to the lawful offsite disposal of straight asbestos materials

disposed as part of the demolition of asbestos clad structures at the site. The documentation shows that 2.38 tonnes of straight

asbestos was disposed off-site on the 16th October 2017 to SUEZ Waste and Recycling Centre, Elizabeth Drive Kemps Creek

landfill.

Geotest were provided with weighbridge documentation relating to the lawful offsite disposal of asbestos impacted soils generated

as part of the Area A and Area B remediation works at the site. The documentation indicates that a total of 491.58 tonnes of

asbestos impacted soils disposed off-site to Enviroguard Pty Ltd Mamre Road, Erskine Park Landfill on the 20th and 21st November

2017.

Geotest were further provided with waste documentation relating to the off-site disposal of inert and non-hazardous materials

following the demolition of structures (following asbestos removal) and general clean-up works at the site. The documentation

relates to various types of inert and non-hazardous materials such as concrete and brick materials being disposed off-site to

Fairfield City Sustainable Resource Centre and to Greenspot Recycling.

Waste disposal has been provided as an attachment to this report.

12. FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA RELIABILIY

Sampling

Sampling was undertaken in general accordance with Geotest procedures, which are based on industry practice. Geotest

procedures mean disposable sampling equipment is preferred, eliminating the risk for cross contamination. Further, samples were

collected from undisturbed soils within the excavator bucket or from within the test pit walls, broken by hand using a clean pair of

disposable nitrile gloves for each sample for placement into the storage containers. During each of the works, Geotest ensured

phosphorus free Decon 90 and potable town water were available for the de-contamination of any re-usable tools, should these

have been required.

Field Duplicates

A selected sample was split in the field by the consultant and placed in separate sets of laboratory supplied sample containers.

Both the primary and duplicate samples were sent to the primary laboratory under COC conditions. One interlaboratory sample

was collected and scheduled for analysis within the supplementary laboratory, EnviroLab Services, Chatswood laboratory (NATA

Accredited for the methods used. The analysis of field duplicate samples provides an assessment of the precision of the sampling

and laboratory analytical procedures. The following field duplicates were taken:

Sampling Date Parent Sample ID Duplicate ID intra / inter

21/11/2017 HM1-1 DUP1 / DUP1a




All samples and analytes generally reported relative percentage difference (RPD) between the parent samples and duplicates

within the accepted +/- 50% limit, this is with exception to the following samples/ analytes and reported relative percentage

difference (RPD) between the parent samples, duplicates and triplicates:

Primary Sample

Duplicate Analyte RPD % Prim / Dup Result (mg/kg)

Laboratory Limit of Detection

HM1-1 DUP1 Lead 54.5 21.0 / 54.5 5.0 mg/kg

HM1-1 DUP1A Arsenic 90.9 16.0 / 6.0 2 mg/kg

HM1-1 DUP1A Lead -54.4 21.0 / 12.0 5.0 mg/kg

Both the primary sample and duplicate samples returned results close to the laboratory limit of reporting. Small numerical variations

in reported values provides an inflated representation of RPD values upon calculation. Therefore, these RPD exceedances are not

considered to be significant nor expected to affect data reliability. All other RPDs were within the acceptable 50% limits. All RPD

calculations are presented in Table LT2.

Wash Blanks

Wash blanks were not part of the scope for this investigation. Only disposable consumables were used eliminating the potential

for cross contamination.

Trip Spike & Blank

A trip spike and blank for volatiles did not form part of the scope for this assessment as volatile hydrocarbons were not a primary

contaminant of concern. Should any additional works at the site identify the risk of significant volatile hydrocarbons, a trip spike

and blank may be required.

Sample Preservation and Storage

Sample storage and preservation is presented in the table below:

Analyte Sample Volume and Container Preservative Storage

Organics/ inorganics (soil)

250ml glass & Teflon lined lid Nil Insulated container with ice

Asbestos Sealed zip lock bag Nil Stored with soil samples

The sample containers were transported to the NATA accredited analytical laboratory with the Chain of Custody (COC) form,

recording the following information:

• project reference;

• date of sampling;

• sample identification;

• matrix and container details

• preservation method;

• name of sampler;

• required analysis;

• turnaround times required; and

• signatures of sender and receiving laboratory.

A copy of the COC was kept in the project file (attached Appendix B). Samples were transported to the laboratory with sufficient

time to perform analysis within the applicable holding period.




Laboratory Reported Data

A copy of the COC was kept in the project file. Selected samples were transported to the laboratory with sufficient time to perform

analysis within the applicable holding period recording the information mentioned above. Laboratory analysis was scheduled on

representative samples for the relevant contaminants of concern. Laboratory analysis was carried out by Eurofins MGT Lane Cove

and EnviroLab Chatswood, both laboratories are NATA accredited for the methods used. An assessment of laboratory data quality

was undertaken.

The following laboratory reports were prepared for this project:

Report Date Eurofins MGT #

Report Identification 03/11/2017 570297




The corresponding laboratory certificates and COC documentation are attached to the end of this letter.

The results of this assessment indicated the following:

• laboratory analysis of samples was undertaken by a NATA accredited environmental testing laboratory;

• Eurofins MGT Lane Cove is accredited by NATA for chemical testing services. Eurofins has a quality system compliant to

ISO/IEC 17025 and work to documented procedures in accordance with this standard.

• The review showed that samples were extracted and analysed within appropriate holding times;

• the laboratory QAQC data was reviewed and is considered to be satisfactory for the investigation;

• the laboratory limits of reporting (LOR) were below the adopted assessment criteria.

Data Quality Assessment

Based on an assessment of the quality of the field data and laboratory data, Geotest considers that the data assessed is adequate

and reliable for the purposes of this assessment.

13. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

We have provided a summary of reported laboratory results, copies of the certificates of analysis are attached to this report. Results

of the laboratory analysis have been presented within table LT1 attached to the end of this report.

Metals (8)

The reported metals results were less than the adopted site criteria.

OCP / OPP

The concentrations of aldrin, dieldrin, chlordane, DDT, DDD, DDE and heptachlor in the samples analysed were all less than the

adopted site criteria.

PAHs

The sample’s analysed for PAHs reported concentrations were all below the adopted site criteria.




TRH / BTEX

The sample’s analysed for TRH and BTEX were all below the adopted site criteria.

PCB

The sample’s analysed for PCB were all below the adopted site criteria.

Asbestos

The results indicated that no asbestos was detected within any validation samples. Further, no visible ACM was observed during

clearance inspections following removal.

14. DISCUSSION

Human Health

The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that the concentrations of the contaminants of potential concern in soils at the

validation sampling locations are less than the adopted human health assessment criteria. Geotest considers that further

assessment for human health is not warranted.

Aesthetics

No evidence of un-suitable waste, debris, staining, discolouration or odours were observed within the assessment areas following

remediation at the site. There was no ACM observed during final clearance inspections.

Soils - Ecological Environments

The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that the concentrations of chemicals in soils at the validation sampling locations are

less than the adopted ecological health assessment criteria. Geotest considers that further assessment for ecological health risk

within the nominated areas is not warranted.

15. CONCLUSION

Based on the original suitability of the site, observations made during fieldwork and the review supplied and received data: Geotest

Services concludes that the nominated areas assessed at 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW site have been appropriately

validated and are considered suitable for the proposed residential land uses (NEPM 2013 HIL-A; residential with garden/accessible

soil).

Geotest makes the following comments to ensure overall development validation can be achieved:

• An assessment within the footprints of existing site structures should be undertaken should these structures be demolished

in future;

• An assessment of the dam soil is to be undertaken following any decommissioning of the dam and prior to re-use of the soils

at the site.

In the event that any additional contamination or un-expected finds (ie. animal carcasses, burial pits, aesthetically unsuitable

materials) are identified during re-development, an appropriately experienced consultant should be engaged to attend site. The

works should cease immediately in the area of the discovery.

This report should be read in conjunction with the document limitations presented in Section 16 of this report.




16. YOUR GEOTEST SERVICES DOCUMENT LIMITATIONS

It is critical you grasp your Geotest Services document as a whole as it has been prepared on the basis of a specific objective and

scope as interpreted by Geotest Services and applies only to the site or nominated area assessed.

The scope of works and report was prepared in response to specific instructions from the Geotest Service’s client whom the report

is addressed to. The scope, analysis, evaluations, conclusions and opinions presented in the report are based on these instructions

from the client and information available and collected during our assessment.

The subsurface and ground conditions of the questioned property are subject to change over time from both natural and

anthropogenic factors. The report presented has been prepared on the ground conditions observed at this time. Decisions should

not be made on the basis of this report if it has been impacted by time.

The report has been prepared to accurately determine site conditions whilst working within the budgetary and scope of work

constraints given to Geotest. This may include physical, occupant or any other constraint at the site preventing access for

investigation. Ground conditions may differ from those encountered in the report. No report can practically qualify the exact sub

conditions present across the entire site at any given time.

The conclusions above are based on the selective sampling program which is targeted to be representative of the site and

conditions of the immediate area if reported. The document is set out using relevant regulatory authority guidelines and industry

accepted practices. The document conclusions do not provide a guarantee that the ground conditions between those sampling

points investigated are indifferent to those assessed.

The document Geotest Services has prepared for you should not be used for any other purpose than that originally specified in

the report and at the time of commissioning.

The report and its appendices, supporting documents should be read in completeness and certainly not separated. The report will

not be conclusive if a single section is interpreted without the support of the remaining components.

To prevent any mis-interpretations of the report, Geotest Services recommends the client or end user contact them with any

misunderstood or environmental queries relating to this report.




17. CLOSING

Geotest trusts this report is satisfactory to your needs; should you require further information, please contact the below

representative. For and on behalf of Geotest Services Pty Ltd,

Alan Halpin

Environmental Operations Manager

[email protected]

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Figure 1 – Site Locality (extracted Geotest 2017 PSI)

2. Figure 2 – Site Layout Showing Remediation Areas

3. Figure 3 – Site Sampling Locations

4. Site Photographs

5. Laboratory Table LT2

6. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis & individual Chain of Custody documentation

7. Field Test Pit Summary Logs

8. Waste Disposal Documentation & Clearance Inspection (following asbestos removal from structures)

9. Existing Environmental Reports





1. FIGURE 1; SITE LOCALITY

Site shown at centre of image, indicated within yellow shade and red Image source: SIXMap 2017




2. FIGURE 2; SITE LAYOUT SHOWING REMEDIATION AREAS

Image source: NearMap 2017. (Drawn by A.H 05/12/2017)




3. FIGURE 3; SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

Image source: NearMap 2017. (Drawn by A.H 05/12/2017)




4. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS




Image collected during 21st November 2017 sampling event, showing Area A following excavation works (remediation), image facing ~N

Example showing typical surface conditions encountered following excavation for remediation of asbestos impacted soils (Area B)




Another example showing typical surface conditions encountered following excavation for remediation of asbestos impacted soils (Area A).

Example showing W portion of site consisting gravel access way and vacant lands. Image facing W




Example showing typical gravel and soil materials encountered during the assessment (gravel access way)

Another example showing typical gravel and soil materials encountered during the assessment (gravel access way)




Example showing typical soil materials encountered during the assessment within former market gardening areas

Example showing typical soil materials encountered during the assessment within former market gardening areas




5. LABORATORY TABLE LT2

Table LT2 Reference S17-No26054 S17-No26060 169516

17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields Sample ID HM1-1 DUP1 RPD % DUP1A RPD %

Field Data Quality Assessment Date Sampled 21/11/2017 21/11/2017 21/11/2017

P30868.1_R01 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil

Group Analyte

Metals Arsenic 16.0 10.0 46.2 6.0 -90.9

Cadmium < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0 <0.4 0.0

Chromium 72.0 52.0 32.3 54.0 -28.6

Copper < 5 < 5 0.0 <1 0.0

Lead 21.0 12.0 54.5 12.0 -54.5

Mercury < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Nickel < 5 < 5 0.0 4.0 0.0

Zinc < 5 < 5 0.0 3.0 0.0

OCP 4.4'-DDD < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

4.4'-DDE < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

4.4'-DDT < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

a-BHC < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Aldrin < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

b-BHC < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Chlordanes - Total < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0

d-BHC < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Dieldrin < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Endosulfan I < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Endosulfan II < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Endosulfan sulphate < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Endrin < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Endrin aldehyde < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Endrin ketone < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0

g-BHC (Lindane) < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Heptachlor < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Heptachlor epoxide < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Hexachlorobenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0

Methoxychlor < 0.05 < 0.2 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Toxaphene < 1 < 1 0.0

OPP Azinphos-methyl < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Bolstar < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Chlorfenvinphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Chlorpyrifos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Chlorpyrifos-methyl < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Coumaphos < 2 < 2 0.0

Demeton-O < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Demeton-S < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Diazinon < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Dichlorvos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Dimethoate < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Disulfoton < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

EPN < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Ethion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Ethoprop < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Ethyl parathion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Fenitrothion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Fensulfothion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Fenthion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Malathion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Merphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Methyl parathion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Mevinphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Monocrotophos < 2 < 2 0.0

Naled < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Omethoate < 2 < 2 0.0

Phorate < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Pirimiphos-methyl < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Pyrazophos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Ronnel < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Terbufos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Tetrachlorvinphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Tokuthion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

Trichloronate < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0

PCBs Total PCB < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0

PAH Acenaphthene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Acenaphthylene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Anthracene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Benz(a)anthracene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Benzo(a)pyrene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.05 0.0

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.5 0.0

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.6 0.6 0.0 <0.5 0.0

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 1.2 1.2 0.0 <0.5 0.0

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.2 0.0

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Benzo(k)fluoranthene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.2 0.0

Chrysene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Fluoranthene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Fluorene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Naphthalene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Phenanthrene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Pyrene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.1 0.0

Total PAH* < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <0.05 0.0

TRH & BTEX Benzene < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 <0.2 0.0

Ethylbenzene < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 <1 0.0

m&p-Xylenes < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 <2 0.0

o-Xylene < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 <1 0.0

Toluene < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 <0.5 0.0

Xylenes - Total < 0.3 < 0.3 0.0 <1 0.0

Naphthalene < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0 <1 0.0

TRH >C10-C16 < 50 < 50 0.0 <50 0.0

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2) < 50 < 50 0.0 <50 0.0

TRH >C16-C34 < 100 < 100 0.0 <100 0.0

TRH >C34-C40 < 100 < 100 0.0 <100 0.0

TRH C6-C10 < 20 < 20 0.0 <25 0.0

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1) < 20 < 20 0.0 <25 0.0

Limit Of Reporting (LOR) may differ between inter/intra labarotories. In the case that the two samples are less than the LOR, Geotest assumes a value of 0.0 for the purpose of the RPD calculation.

RPD Exceedances Highlighted in Yellow

P30868 TABLE LT2 1 of 1




6. LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS

Certificate of Analysis

Geotest Services

Unit 18/24 Garling Rd

Kings Park

NSW 2148

Attention: Dave Spasojevic-All Results

Report 570297-S

Project name 17 SCHOFIELDS RD

Project ID P30868.4

Received Date Oct 31, 2017

Client Sample ID C1-C2 C3-C4 C5-C6 C7-C8

Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-Oc35327 S17-Oc35328 S17-Oc35329 S17-Oc35330

Date Sampled Oct 27, 2017 Oct 27, 2017 Oct 27, 2017 Oct 27, 2017

Test/Reference LOR Unit

Organochlorine Pesticides

Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1

Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05

DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 141 87 124 88

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 100 77 107 67

Organophosphorus Pesticides

Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Coumaphos 2 mg/kg - < 2 - < 2

Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Date Reported: Nov 03, 2017

Eurofins | mgt Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066

ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of 11

Report Number: 570297-S

NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 18217

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.

Client Sample ID C1-C2 C3-C4 C5-C6 C7-C8






Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

EPN 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Malathion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg - < 2 - < 2

Naled 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Omethoate 2 mg/kg - < 2 - < 2

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % - 103 - 101

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 13 19 11 9.0

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 14 21 12 13

Copper 5 mg/kg 25 24 15 31

Lead 5 mg/kg 21 27 24 24

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 10 11 6.7 9.2

Zinc 5 mg/kg 59 83 61 86

% Moisture 1 % 14 13 24 12



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of 11


Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation).

If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.

Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time

Eurofins | mgt Suite B14

Organochlorine Pesticides Sydney Nov 01, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-ORG-2220 OCP & PCB in Soil and Water

Organophosphorus Pesticides Sydney Nov 01, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-ORG-2200 Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS

Metals M8 Sydney Nov 01, 2017 28 Day

- Method: LTM-MET-3040_R0 TOTAL AND DISSOLVED METALS AND MERCURY IN WATERS BY ICP-MS

% Moisture Sydney Nov 01, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of 11


.Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Oct 31, 2017 4:30 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 570297 Due: Nov 3, 2017

Kings Park Phone: 02 9671 4443 Priority: 3 DayNSW 2148 Fax: 02 9671 4343 Contact Name: Dave Spasojevic-All Results

Project Name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RDProject ID: P30868.4

Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Andrew Black

Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964

Organochlorine P

esticides

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271

Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X

Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794

Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736

External Laboratory

No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime

Matrix LAB ID

1 C1-C2 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35327 X X X




5 DW1 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35331 X

6 DW2 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35332 X

7 DW3 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35333 X

8 DW4 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35334 X

Test Counts 4 2 4 2 4

ABN– 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au

MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne2-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh VIC 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271

SydneySydneySydneySydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217

BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794

PerthPerthPerthPerth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736

Date Reported:Nov 03, 2017


ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of 11


Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary

General

Holding Times

Units

Terms

QC - Acceptance Criteria

QC Data General Comments

1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on

request.

2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.

3. All biota results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.

4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.

5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.

6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.

7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.

8. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.

Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).

For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample

Receipt Advice.

If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.

Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.

**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD

mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre

ug/L: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million

ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage

org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units

MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres

Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.

LOR Limit of Reporting.

SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.

RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.

LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.

CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.

Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.

Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.

Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

APHA American Public Health Association

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

COC Chain of Custody

SRA Sample Receipt Advice

QSM Quality Systems Manual ver 5.1 US Department of Defense

CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report

NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.

TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient

RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:

Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit

Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%

Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%

Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 50-150%-Phenols & PFASs

PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.1 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was

affected.

1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within

the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.

2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent

and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.

3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.

4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.

5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported

in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.

6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.

Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.

7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.

8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.

9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.

10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of 11


Quality Control Results

Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits

PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


Chlordanes - Total mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

a-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Aldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

b-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

d-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Dieldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan I mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan II mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin aldehyde mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin ketone mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Heptachlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Methoxychlor mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Toxaphene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass

Method Blank


Azinphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Bolstar mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Coumaphos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Demeton-S mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Demeton-O mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Diazinon mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dimethoate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Disulfoton mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

EPN mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Malathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Merphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Monocrotophos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Naled mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Omethoate mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Phorate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of 11



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Pyrazophos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ronnel mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Terbufos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tokuthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass

Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


4.4'-DDD % 124 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE % 115 70-130 Pass

a-BHC % 112 70-130 Pass

Aldrin % 106 70-130 Pass

b-BHC % 106 70-130 Pass

d-BHC % 107 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin % 115 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I % 109 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II % 112 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate % 110 70-130 Pass

Endrin % 122 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde % 79 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone % 109 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) % 108 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor % 108 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide % 113 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene % 98 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor % 123 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Diazinon % 104 70-130 Pass

Dimethoate % 86 70-130 Pass

Ethion % 92 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion % 86 70-130 Pass

Methyl parathion % 90 70-130 Pass

Mevinphos % 104 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals

Arsenic % 94 70-130 Pass

Cadmium % 93 70-130 Pass

Chromium % 97 70-130 Pass

Copper % 95 70-130 Pass

Lead % 95 70-130 Pass

Mercury % 93 70-130 Pass

Nickel % 91 70-130 Pass

Zinc % 95 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 7 of 11


Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance

LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1

4.4'-DDD S17-Oc35110 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-Oc34674 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-No02930 NCP % 114 70-130 Pass

a-BHC S17-Oc34674 NCP % 106 70-130 Pass

Aldrin S17-Oc34674 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass

b-BHC S17-Oc34674 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

d-BHC S17-Oc34674 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin S17-Oc34674 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I S17-Oc34674 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II S17-Oc34674 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-Oc34674 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Endrin S17-Oc34674 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-Oc34674 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone S17-Oc34674 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-Oc34674 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor S17-Oc34674 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-Oc34674 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-Oc34674 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor S17-No00220 NCP % 84 70-130 Pass

Toxaphene S17-No00216 NCP % 121 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Heavy Metals Result 1

Arsenic S17-No00214 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Cadmium S17-No00214 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Chromium S17-Oc34735 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Copper S17-Oc34735 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass

Lead S17-No00214 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Mercury S17-No00214 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass

Nickel S17-No00214 NCP % 83 70-130 Pass

Zinc S17-No00214 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1

Diazinon S17-No00220 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Dimethoate S17-No00220 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Ethion S17-No00220 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion S17-No00220 NCP % 82 70-130 Pass

Methyl parathion S17-No00220 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass

Mevinphos S17-No00220 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate

Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Arsenic S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 3.5 3.5 <1 30% Pass

Cadmium S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

Chromium S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 24 22 9.0 30% Pass

Copper S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 39 31 21 30% Pass

Lead S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 24 24 <1 30% Pass

Mercury S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 0.1 < 0.1 13 30% Pass

Nickel S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 71 70 2.0 30% Pass

Zinc S17-No00213 NCP mg/kg 59 56 5.0 30% Pass

Duplicate

Result 1 Result 2 RPD

% Moisture S17-Se01158 NCP % 23 26 12 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 8 of 11


Duplicate

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Azinphos-methyl S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Bolstar S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorfenvinphos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos-methyl S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Coumaphos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-S S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-O S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Diazinon S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dichlorvos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dimethoate S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Disulfoton S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

EPN S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethoprop S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethyl parathion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenitrothion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fensulfothion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenthion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Malathion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Merphos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Methyl parathion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Mevinphos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Monocrotophos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Naled S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Omethoate S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Phorate S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Pirimiphos-methyl S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Pyrazophos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ronnel S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Terbufos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tetrachlorvinphos S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tokuthion S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Trichloronate S17-No00219 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chlordanes - Total S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDD S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

a-BHC S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Aldrin S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

b-BHC S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

d-BHC S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Dieldrin S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan I S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan II S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin ketone S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 9 of 11


Duplicate


Hexachlorobenzene S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Methoxychlor S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Toxaphene S17-Oc35329 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 10 of 11


Comments

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A

Attempt to Chill was evident Yes

Sample correctly preserved Yes

Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes

Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes

Samples received within HoldingTime Yes

Some samples have been subcontracted No

Comments

Authorised By

Andrew Black Analytical Services Manager

Nibha Vaidya Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)

Glenn Jackson

National Operations Manager

- Indicates Not Requested

* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service

Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 11 of 11


https://d1jj3zdoktl3jd.cloudfront.net/apac/media/489918/reporting-measurement-uncertainty-of-chemical-and-microbiology-test-results-september-2017.pdf


Geotest ServicesUnit 18/24 Garling RdKings ParkNSW 2148

Attention: Dave Spasojevic-All ResultsReport 570297-AIDProject Name 17 SCHOFIELDS RDProject ID P30868.4Received Date Oct 31, 2017Date Reported Nov 03, 2017

Methodology:Asbestos FibreIdentification

Conducted in accordance with the Australian Standard AS 4964 – 2004: Method for the Qualitative Identification ofAsbestos in Bulk Samples and in-house Method LTM-ASB-8020 by polarised light microscopy (PLM) and dispersionstaining (DS) techniques.NOTE: Positive Trace Analysis results indicate the sample contains detectable respirable fibres.

Unknown MineralFibres

Mineral fibres of unknown type, as determined by PLM with DS, may require another analytical technique, such asElectron Microscopy, to confirm unequivocal identity.NOTE: While Actinolite, Anthophyllite and Tremolite asbestos may be detected by PLM with DS, due to variability in theoptical properties of these materials, AS4964 requires that these are reported as UMF unless confirmed by anindependent technique.

Subsampling SoilSamples

The whole sample submitted is first dried and then passed through a 10mm sieve followed by a 2mm sieve. All fibrousmatter greater than 10mm, greater than 2mm as well as the material passing through the 2mm sieve are retained andanalysed for the presence of asbestos. If the sub 2mm fraction is greater than approximately 30 to 60g then a sub-sampling routine based on ISO 3082:2009(E) is employed.NOTE: Depending on the nature and size of the soil sample, the sub-2 mm residue material may need to be sub-sampled for trace analysis, in accordance with AS 4964-2004.

Bonded asbestos-containing material(ACM)

The material is first examined and any fibres isolated for identification by PLM and DS. Where required, interferingmatrices may be removed by disintegration using a range of heat, chemical or physical treatments, possibly incombination.The resultant material is then further examined in accordance with AS 4964 - 2004.NOTE: Even after disintegration it may be difficult to detect the presence of asbestos in some asbestos-containing bulkmaterials using PLM and DS. This is due to the low grade or small length or diameter of the asbestos fibres present inthe material, or to the fact that very fine fibres have been distributed intimately throughout the materials. Vinyl/asbestosfloor tiles, some asbestos-containing sealants and mastics, asbestos-containing epoxy resins and some ore samples areexamples of these types of material, which are difficult to analyse.

Limit of Reporting The performance limitation of the AS4964 method for inhomogeneous samples is around 0.1 g/kg (0.01% (w/w)). Whereno asbestos is found by PLM and DS, including Trace Analysis where required, this is considered to be at the nominalreporting limit of 0.01 % (w / w).The examination of large sample sizes(500 mL is recommended) may improve thelikelihood of identifying ACM in the > 2mm fraction.The NEPM screening level of 0.001 % (w / w) asbestos in soil forFA(friable asbestos) and AF(asbestos fines) then applies where they are able to be quantified by gravimetricprocedures.This quantitative screening is not generally applicable to FF(free fibres) and results of Trace Analysis arereferred.NOTE: NATA News March 2014, p.7, states in relation to AS4964: “This is a qualitative method with a nominal reportinglimit of 0.01%” and that currently in Australia “there is no validated method available for the quantification of asbestos”.Accordingly, NATA Accreditation does not cover the performance of this service (indicated with an asterisk).This report is consistent with the analytical procedures and reporting recommendations in the National EnvironmentProtection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure, 2013 (as amended) and the Western Australia Guidelines forthe Assessment, Remediation and Management of Asbestos-Contaminated Sites in Western Australia, 2009, includingsupporting document Recommended Procedures for Laboratory Analysis of Asbestos in Soil, June 2011.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of

Report Number: 570297-AID

6

NATA Accredited

Accreditation Number 1261

Site Number 18217

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025–TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.

Project Name 17 SCHOFIELDS RDProject ID P30868.4Date Sampled Oct 27, 2017Report 570297-AID

Client Sample ID Eurofins | mgtSample No. Date Sampled Sample Description Result

DW1 17-Oc35331 Oct 27, 2017 Approximate Sample 261gSample consisted of: Dark brown fine grain soil and rocks

No asbestos detected at the reporting limit of 0.01% w/w.Organic fibre detected.

No respirable fibres detected.












ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of


6

NATA Accredited


Site Number 18217


Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this,some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However, no substantive change has beenmade to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results(regarding both quality and NATA accreditation).

If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised resultsshould testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.


Asbestos - LTM-ASB-8020 Sydney Nov 01, 2017 Indefinite



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of


6

V2

ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au

Melbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh VIC 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271

SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217

Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794

Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736

Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Oct 31, 2017 4:30 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 570297 Due: Nov 3, 2017




Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964

Organochlorine P

esticides

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID





5 DW1 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35331 X

6 DW2 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35332 X

7 DW3 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35333 X

8 DW4 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35334 X




ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of


6


General1. QC data may be available on request.




Holding TimesPlease refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).


Receipt Advice.



Units% w/w: weight for weight basis grams per kilogram

Filter loading: fibres/100 graticule areas

Reported Concentration: fibres/mL

Flowrate: L/min

TermsDry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis

LOR Limit of Reporting



ISO International Standards Organisation

AS Australian Standards

WA DOH Western Australia Department of Health

NOHSC National Occupational Health and Safety Commission

ACM Bonded asbestos-containing material means any material containing more than 1% asbestos and comprises asbestos-containing-material which is in sound condition,

although possibly broken or fragmented, and where the asbestos is bound in a matrix such as cement or resin. Common examples of ACM include but are not limited

to: pipe and boiler insulation, sprayed-on fireproofing, troweled-on acoustical plaster, floor tile and mastic, floor linoleum, transite shingles, roofing materials, wall and

ceiling plaster, ceiling tiles, and gasket materials. This term is restricted to material that cannot pass a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve. This sieve size is selected because it

approximates the thickness of common asbestos cement sheeting and for fragments to be smaller than this would imply a high degree of damage and hence potential

for fibre release.

FA FA comprises friable asbestos material and includes severely weathered cement sheet, insulation products and woven asbestos material. This type of friable asbestos

is defined here as asbestos material that is in a degraded condition such that it can be broken or crumbled by hand pressure. This material is typically unbonded or

was previously bonded and is now significantly degraded (crumbling).

PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material means thermal system insulation and surfacing material found in buildings, vessels, and vessel sections constructed no later

than 1980 that are assumed to contain greater than one percent asbestos but have not been sampled or analyzed to verify or negate the presence of asbestos.

AF Asbestos fines (AF) are defined as free fibres, or fibre bundles, smaller than 7mm. It is the free fibres which present the greatest risk to human health, although very

small fibres (< 5 microns in length) are not considered to be such a risk. AF also includes small fragments of bonded ACM that pass through a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve.

(Note that for bonded ACM fragments to pass through a 7 mm x 7 mm sieve implies a substatntial degree of damage which increases the potential for fibre release.)

AC Asbestos cement means a mixture of cement and asbestos fibres (typically 90:10 ratios).



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of


6

Comments








Comments

Qualifier Codes/Comments

Code DescriptionN/A Not applicable

Asbestos Counter/Identifier:

Sayeed Abu Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)

Authorised by:

Laxman Dias Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)

Glenn Jackson




Uncertainty data is available on requestEurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of


6

Final Report – this report replaces any previously issued Report



Attention: Dave Spasojevic-All ResultsReport 573753-AIDProject Name 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDSProject ID P30868.4 AReceived Date Nov 22, 2017Date Reported Nov 24, 2017












ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of


8

NATA Accredited


Site Number 18217


Project Name 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDSProject ID P30868.4 ADate Sampled Nov 21, 2017Report 573753-AID


HA1-1 17-No25972 Nov 21, 2017 Approximate Sample 91gSample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks

No asbestos detected at the reporting limit of 0.001% w/w.*Organic fibre detected.No respirable fibres detected.











SA1-1 17-No25978 Nov 21, 2017 Approximate Sample 140gSample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks










ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of


8

NATA Accredited


Site Number 18217





SAW-1 17-No25983 Nov 21, 2017 Approximate Sample 138gSample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks






ASB1 17-No25986 Nov 21, 2017 Approximate Sample 246gSample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks


ASB2 17-No25987 Nov 21, 2017 Approximate Sample 302gSample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil and rocks




ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of


8

NATA Accredited


Site Number 18217








ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of


8

V2






Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Nov 22, 2017 4:45 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 573753 Due: Nov 24, 2017


Project Name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDSProject ID: P30868.4 A


Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964


Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X



External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

1 HA1-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25972 X

2 HA1-2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25973 X

3 HA1-3 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25974 X

4 HA1-4 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25975 X

5 HA1-5 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25976 X

6 HA1-6 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25977 X

7 SA1-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25978 X

8 SA1-2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25979 X

9 SA1-3 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25980 X



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of


8

V2










Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964





10 SA1-4 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25981 X

11 SA1-5 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25982 X

12 SAW-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25983 X

13 SAW-2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25984 X

14 SAW-3 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25985 X

15 ASB1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25986 X

16 ASB2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25987 X

Test Counts 16



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of


8








Receipt Advice.






Flowrate: L/min














for fibre release.












ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 7 of


8

Comments








Comments





Authorised by:


Glenn Jackson







ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 8 of


8



Geotest Services


Kings Park

NSW 2148


Report 573768-S

Project name 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDS

Project ID P30868.4 B

Received Date Nov 22, 2017

Client Sample ID HM1-1 HM1-2 HM1-3 SM1-1


Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-No26054 S17-No26055 S17-No26056 S17-No26057

Date Sampled Nov 21, 2017 Nov 21, 2017 Nov 21, 2017 Nov 21, 2017


Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions

TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 < 50

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 < 50

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 < 50

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - < 0.3 < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 88 - 96 101


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 < 20

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20 < 20

TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 < 50

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50 < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100 < 100

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100 < 100

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 - 0.6 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 - 1.2 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of 18










Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 99 - 91 90

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 99 - 93 93


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1

Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05

Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1




Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 - -

Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of 18








Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 - -

Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 - -

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 - -

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 96 99 - -

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

Aroclor-1016 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Aroclor-1232 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Aroclor-1242 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Aroclor-1248 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Aroclor-1254 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Aroclor-1260 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

Total PCB* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5



Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 16 6.8 4.4 6.3

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4


Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 7.2 < 5 5.8

Lead 5 mg/kg 21 8.1 6.5 7.8

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5 < 5

Zinc 5 mg/kg < 5 15 < 5 12

% Moisture 1 % 14 15 14 15



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of 18


Client Sample ID SM1-2 SM1-3 DUP1

Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-No26058 S17-No26059 S17-No26060

Date Sampled Nov 21, 2017 Nov 21, 2017 Nov 21, 2017



TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 95 - 55


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - < 20

TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - < 100


Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 - 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 - 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 98 - 100

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 104 - 101


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of 18








a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 -

Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 -

Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 130 99 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 114 93 -


Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 - -

Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 - -

Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of 18








Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 - -

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - -

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 99 - -


Aroclor-1016 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1232 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1242 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1248 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1254 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1260 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Total PCB* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 130 99 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 114 93 -

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 2.3 4.9 10

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 7.4 16 52

Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5

Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 11 12

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5

Zinc 5 mg/kg < 5 < 5 < 5

% Moisture 1 % 16 15 12



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of 18





Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 24, 2017 14 Day

- Method: TRH C6-C36 - LTM-ORG-2010

BTEX Sydney Nov 24, 2017 14 Day






Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sydney Nov 24, 2017 14 Days

- Method: LTM-ORG-2130 PAH and Phenols in Soils by GCMS



Eurofins | mgt Suite B15



Organophosphorus Pesticides Sydney Nov 23, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-ORG-2200 Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Sydney Nov 24, 2017 28 Days






ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 7 of 18


.Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Nov 22, 2017 4:45 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 573768 Due: Nov 27, 2017


Project Name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDSProject ID: P30868.4 B


Sample Detail

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

13

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

15

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

1 HM1-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No26054 X X X



4 SM1-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No26057 X X X



7 DUP1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No26060 X X









ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 8 of 18



General

Holding Times

Units

Terms




request.










Receipt Advice.

































affected.

















ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 9 of 18




PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass




Method Blank

BTEX

Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass

Method Blank


Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass


TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass

TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass


Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank



4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass










ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 10 of 18



PassLimits

QualifyingCode











Method Blank


Azinphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Bolstar mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Coumaphos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Demeton-S mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Demeton-O mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Diazinon mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dimethoate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Disulfoton mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

EPN mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Malathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Merphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Monocrotophos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Naled mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Omethoate mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Phorate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Pyrazophos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ronnel mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Terbufos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tokuthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Method Blank


Aroclor-1016 mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass








ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 11 of 18



PassLimits

QualifyingCode


Total PCB* mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals









LCS - % Recovery


TRH C6-C9 % 80 70-130 Pass

TRH C10-C14 % 110 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

BTEX

Benzene % 78 70-130 Pass

Toluene % 82 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene % 78 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes % 76 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene % 75 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total % 76 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Naphthalene % 81 70-130 Pass

TRH C6-C10 % 79 70-130 Pass

TRH >C10-C16 % 119 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Acenaphthene % 105 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene % 106 70-130 Pass

Anthracene % 113 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene % 106 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene % 105 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 100 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 107 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 103 70-130 Pass

Chrysene % 105 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 109 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene % 105 70-130 Pass

Fluorene % 106 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 106 70-130 Pass


Phenanthrene % 102 70-130 Pass

Pyrene % 105 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


4.4'-DDD % 114 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE % 98 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT % 72 70-130 Pass

a-BHC % 105 70-130 Pass




ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 12 of 18



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

b-BHC % 96 70-130 Pass

d-BHC % 95 70-130 Pass













LCS - % Recovery


Diazinon % 117 70-130 Pass

Dimethoate % 93 70-130 Pass

Ethion % 94 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion % 90 70-130 Pass

Methyl parathion % 93 70-130 Pass

Mevinphos % 110 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Aroclor-1260 % 95 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals





Lead % 102 70-130 Pass



Zinc % 101 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1

TRH C6-C9 S17-No26054 CP % 98 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

BTEX Result 1

Benzene S17-No26054 CP % 84 70-130 Pass

Toluene S17-No26054 CP % 106 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene S17-No26054 CP % 106 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes S17-No26054 CP % 111 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene S17-No26054 CP % 111 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total S17-No26054 CP % 111 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Naphthalene S17-No26054 CP % 106 70-130 Pass

TRH C6-C10 S17-No26054 CP % 95 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Dieldrin S17-No27462 NCP % 114 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 13 of 18



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Endrin S17-No28891 NCP % 73 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone S17-No26065 NCP % 70 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor S17-No29124 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass


Spike - % Recovery


Arsenic S17-No27413 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Cadmium S17-No27413 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Chromium S17-No27413 NCP % 71 70-130 Pass

Copper S17-No27413 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Lead S17-No27413 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Mercury S17-No27413 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass

Nickel S17-No27413 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

Zinc S17-No27413 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1

Acenaphthene S17-No26055 CP % 119 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene S17-No26055 CP % 121 70-130 Pass

Anthracene S17-No26055 CP % 129 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene S17-No26055 CP % 118 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene S17-No26055 CP % 121 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene S17-No26055 CP % 128 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene S17-No26055 CP % 116 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene S17-No26055 CP % 108 70-130 Pass

Chrysene S17-No26055 CP % 122 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene S17-No26055 CP % 125 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene S17-No26055 CP % 117 70-130 Pass

Fluorene S17-No26055 CP % 121 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene S17-No26055 CP % 120 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene S17-No26055 CP % 121 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene S17-No26055 CP % 113 70-130 Pass

Pyrene S17-No26055 CP % 119 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


4.4'-DDD S17-No26055 CP % 98 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-No26055 CP % 97 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-No26055 CP % 93 70-130 Pass

a-BHC S17-No26055 CP % 93 70-130 Pass

Aldrin S17-No26055 CP % 89 70-130 Pass

b-BHC S17-No26055 CP % 85 70-130 Pass

d-BHC S17-No26055 CP % 87 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I S17-No26055 CP % 93 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II S17-No26055 CP % 91 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-No26055 CP % 84 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-No26055 CP % 85 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-No26055 CP % 85 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-No26055 CP % 89 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-No26055 CP % 89 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1

Diazinon S17-No26055 CP % 130 70-130 Pass

Dimethoate S17-No26055 CP % 107 70-130 Pass

Ethion S17-No26055 CP % 113 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion S17-No26055 CP % 101 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 14 of 18



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Methyl parathion S17-No26055 CP % 106 70-130 Pass

Mevinphos S17-No26055 CP % 117 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1

Aroclor-1260 S17-No26055 CP % 101 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH C10-C14 S17-No27971 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH >C10-C16 S17-No27971 NCP % 116 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD

TRH C6-C9 S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Benzene S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Toluene S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Ethylbenzene S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

m&p-Xylenes S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

o-Xylene S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Xylenes - Total S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Naphthalene S17-No27952 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass


Duplicate

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Acenaphthene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Chlordanes - Total S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDD S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

a-BHC S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Aldrin S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

b-BHC S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 15 of 18


Duplicate


d-BHC S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Dieldrin S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan I S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan II S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin ketone S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Methoxychlor S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Toxaphene S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Azinphos-methyl S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Bolstar S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorfenvinphos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos-methyl S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Coumaphos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-S S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-O S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Diazinon S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dichlorvos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dimethoate S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Disulfoton S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

EPN S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethoprop S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethyl parathion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenitrothion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fensulfothion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenthion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Malathion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Merphos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Methyl parathion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Mevinphos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Monocrotophos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Naled S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Omethoate S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Phorate S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Pirimiphos-methyl S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Pyrazophos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ronnel S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Terbufos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tetrachlorvinphos S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tokuthion S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Trichloronate S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 16 of 18


Duplicate

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Aroclor-1016 S17-No26054 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass







Duplicate


Arsenic S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg 2.0 < 2 23 30% Pass

Cadmium S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

Chromium S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg 22 13 52 30% Fail Q15

Copper S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg 89 75 18 30% Pass

Lead S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg 9.1 7.0 27 30% Pass

Mercury S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Nickel S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg 14 10 26 30% Pass

Zinc S17-No27412 NCP mg/kg 64 51 22 30% Pass

Duplicate


% Moisture S17-No26054 CP % 14 13 8.0 30% Pass

Duplicate



TRH C15-C28 S17-No29039 NCP mg/kg 210 84 87 30% Fail Q15


Duplicate


TRH >C10-C16 S17-No29039 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass

TRH >C16-C34 S17-No29039 NCP mg/kg 240 < 100 83 30% Fail Q15

TRH >C34-C40 S17-No29039 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 17 of 18


Comments








Comments


Code Description

N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).

N02

Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.

N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.

N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs

Q15 The RPD reported passes Eurofins | mgt's QC - Acceptance Criteria as defined in the Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary page of this report.

Authorised By


Glenn Jackson







ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 18 of 18


https://d1jj3zdoktl3jd.cloudfront.net/apac/media/489949/reporting-measurement-uncertainty-of-chemical-and-microbiology-test-results-hrks-20170931.pdf

Envirolab Services Pty Ltd

ABN 37 112 535 645

12 Ashley St Chatswood NSW 2067

ph 02 9910 6200 fax 02 9910 6201

[email protected]

www.envirolab.com.au

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 180496

18/24 Garling Road, Kings Park, NSW, 2148Address

Administration Email, Alan HalpinAttention

Geotest Services Pty LtdClient

Client Details

23/11/2017Date completed instructions received

23/11/2017Date samples received

1 soilNumber of Samples

P30868.4 BYour Reference

Sample Details

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.

Analysis Details

Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing.

NATA Accreditation Number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

28/11/2017Date of Issue

28/11/2017Date results requested by

Report Details

David Springer, General Manager

Authorised By

Steven Luong, Senior Chemist

Long Pham, Team Leader, Metals

Jeremy Faircloth, Organics Supervisor

Dragana Tomas, Senior Chemist

Results Approved By

Revision No: R00

180496Envirolab Reference: Page | 1 of 16

Client Reference: P30868.4 B

94%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene

<1mg/kgTotal +ve Xylenes

<1mg/kgnaphthalene

<1mg/kgo-Xylene

<2mg/kgm+p-xylene

<1mg/kgEthylbenzene

<0.5mg/kgToluene

<0.2mg/kgBenzene

<25mg/kgvTPH C6 - C10 less BTEX (F1)

<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C10

<25mg/kgTRH C6 - C9

27/11/2017-Date analysed

24/11/2017-Date extracted

soilType of sample

21/11/2017Date Sampled

DUP1AUNITSYour Reference

180496-1Our Reference

vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil

Envirolab Reference: 180496

R00Revision No:

Page | 2 of 16


85%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

<50mg/kgTotal +ve TRH (>C10-C40)

<100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40


<50mg/kgTRH >C10 - C16 less Naphthalene (F2)







soilType of sample




svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 3 of 16


110%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(PQL)

<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc(half)

<0.5mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene TEQ calc (zero)

<0.05mg/kgTotal +ve PAH's

<0.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

<0.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

<0.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

<0.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

<0.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

<0.1mg/kgChrysene

<0.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

<0.1mg/kgPyrene

<0.1mg/kgFluoranthene

<0.1mg/kgAnthracene

<0.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

<0.1mg/kgFluorene

<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthene

<0.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

<0.1mg/kgNaphthalene



soilType of sample




PAHs in Soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 4 of 16


82%Surrogate TCMX

<0.1mg/kgTotal +ve DDT+DDD+DDE

<0.1mg/kgMethoxychlor

<0.1mg/kgEndosulfan Sulphate

<0.1mg/kgEndrin Aldehyde

<0.1mg/kgpp-DDT

<0.1mg/kgEndosulfan II

<0.1mg/kgpp-DDD

<0.1mg/kgEndrin

<0.1mg/kgDieldrin

<0.1mg/kgpp-DDE

<0.1mg/kgEndosulfan I

<0.1mg/kgalpha-chlordane

<0.1mg/kggamma-Chlordane

<0.1mg/kgHeptachlor Epoxide

<0.1mg/kgAldrin

<0.1mg/kgdelta-BHC

<0.1mg/kgHeptachlor

<0.1mg/kgbeta-BHC

<0.1mg/kggamma-BHC

<0.1mg/kgalpha-BHC

<0.1mg/kgHCB



soilType of sample




Organochlorine Pesticides in soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 5 of 16


3mg/kgZinc

4mg/kgNickel

<0.1mg/kgMercury

12mg/kgLead

<1mg/kgCopper

54mg/kgChromium

<0.4mg/kgCadmium

6mg/kgArsenic


24/11/2017-Date prepared

soilType of sample




Acid Extractable metals in soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 6 of 16


14%Moisture


24/11/2017-Date prepared

soilType of sample




Moisture


R00Revision No:

Page | 7 of 16


Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Org-014

Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-MS. Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater - 2013. For soil results:- 1. ‘EQ PQL’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are actually at the PQL. This is the most conservative approach and can give false positive TEQs given that PAHs that contribute to the TEQ calculation may not be present. 2. ‘EQ zero’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are zero. This is the least conservative approach and is more susceptible to false negative TEQs when PAHs that contribute to the TEQ calculation are present but below PQL. 3. ‘EQ half PQL’values are assuming all contributing PAHs reported as <PQL are half the stipulated PQL. Hence a mid-point between the most and least conservative approaches above. Note, the Total +ve PAHs PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve PAHs" is simply a sum of the positive individual PAHs.

Org-012

Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC with dual ECD's. Note, the Total +ve reported DDD+DDE+DDT PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore simply a sum of the positive individually report DDD+DDE+DDT.

Org-005

Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by GC with dual ECD's.

Org-005

Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis. Note, the Total +ve TRH PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve TRH" is simply a sum of the positive individual TRH fractions (>C10-C40).

Org-003

Soil samples are extracted with Dichloromethane/Acetone and waters with Dichloromethane and analysed by GC-FID. F2 = (>C10-C16)-Naphthalene as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater (HSLs Tables 1A (3, 4)). Note Naphthalene is determined from the VOC analysis.

Org-003

Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS. Metals-021

Determination of various metals by ICP-AES. Metals-020

Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.

Inorg-008

Methodology SummaryMethod ID


R00Revision No:

Page | 8 of 16


Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater. Note, the Total +ve Xylene PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore "Total +ve Xylenes" is simply a sum of the positive individual Xylenes.

Org-016

Soil samples are extracted with methanol and spiked into water prior to analysing by purge and trap GC-MS. Water samples are analysed directly by purge and trap GC-MS. F1 = (C6-C10)-BTEX as per NEPM B1 Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.

Org-016

Methodology SummaryMethod ID


R00Revision No:

Page | 9 of 16


[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]92Org-016%Surrogate aaa-Trifluorotoluene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0141mg/kgnaphthalene

[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161mg/kgo-Xylene

[NT]94[NT][NT][NT][NT]<2Org-0162mg/kgm+p-xylene

[NT]90[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Org-0161mg/kgEthylbenzene

[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.5Org-0160.5mg/kgToluene

[NT]88[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.2Org-0160.2mg/kgBenzene

[NT]91[NT][NT][NT][NT]<25Org-01625mg/kgTRH C6 - C10


[NT]27/11/2017[NT][NT][NT][NT]27/11/2017-Date analysed

[NT]24/11/2017[NT][NT][NT][NT]24/11/2017-Date extracted

[NT]LCS-4RPDDup.Base#BlankMethodPQLUnitsTest Description

Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: vTRH(C6-C10)/BTEXN in Soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 10 of 16


[NT]95[NT][NT][NT][NT]104Org-003%Surrogate o-Terphenyl

[NT]109[NT][NT][NT][NT]<100Org-003100mg/kgTRH >C34 -C40









Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: svTRH (C10-C40) in Soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 11 of 16


[NT]120[NT][NT][NT][NT]106Org-012%Surrogate p-Terphenyl-d14

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgDibenzo(a,h)anthracene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgIndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene

[NT]94[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.05Org-0120.05mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.2Org-0120.2mg/kgBenzo(b,j+k)fluoranthene

[NT]102[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgChrysene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgBenzo(a)anthracene

[NT]105[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgPyrene

[NT]98[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgFluoranthene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAnthracene

[NT]96[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgPhenanthrene

[NT]99[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgFluorene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthene

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgAcenaphthylene

[NT]93[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0120.1mg/kgNaphthalene




Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: PAHs in Soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 12 of 16


[NT]94[NT][NT][NT][NT]81Org-005%Surrogate TCMX

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgMethoxychlor

[NT]83[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgEndosulfan Sulphate

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgEndrin Aldehyde

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgpp-DDT

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgEndosulfan II

[NT]100[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgpp-DDD

[NT]87[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgEndrin

[NT]96[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgDieldrin

[NT]101[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgpp-DDE

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgEndosulfan I

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgalpha-chlordane

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kggamma-Chlordane

[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgHeptachlor Epoxide

[NT]86[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgAldrin

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgdelta-BHC

[NT]88[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgHeptachlor

[NT]94[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgbeta-BHC

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kggamma-BHC

[NT]89[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgalpha-BHC

[NT][NT][NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Org-0050.1mg/kgHCB




Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Organochlorine Pesticides in soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 13 of 16


[NT]112[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Metals-0201mg/kgZinc

[NT]106[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Metals-0201mg/kgNickel

[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.1Metals-0210.1mg/kgMercury

[NT]106[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Metals-0201mg/kgLead

[NT]108[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Metals-0201mg/kgCopper

[NT]111[NT][NT][NT][NT]<1Metals-0201mg/kgChromium

[NT]106[NT][NT][NT][NT]<0.4Metals-0200.4mg/kgCadmium

[NT]111[NT][NT][NT][NT]<4Metals-0204mg/kgArsenic


[NT]24/11/2017[NT][NT][NT][NT]24/11/2017-Date prepared


Spike Recovery %DuplicateQUALITY CONTROL: Acid Extractable metals in soil


R00Revision No:

Page | 14 of 16


Not ReportedNR

National Environmental Protection MeasureNEPM

Not specifiedNS

Laboratory Control SampleLCS

Relative Percent DifferenceRPD

Greater than>

Less than<

Practical Quantitation LimitPQL

Insufficient sample for this testINS

Test not requiredNA

Not testedNT

Result Definitions

Australian Drinking Water Guidelines recommend that Thermotolerant Coliform, Faecal Enterococci, & E.Coli levels are less than1cfu/100mL. The recommended maximums are taken from "Australian Drinking Water Guidelines", published by NHMRC & ARMC2011.

Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds whichare similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Surrogate Spike

This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank sand or water) fortifiedwith analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

LCS (LaboratoryControl Sample)

A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix spikeis to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferencesexist.

Matrix Spike

This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample selectedshould be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.

Duplicate

This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as forsamples.

Blank

Quality Control Definitions


R00Revision No:

Page | 15 of 16


Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity of the analysis whererecommended technical holding times may have been breached.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs), the analysis hasproceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse within the THT or as soon aspracticable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples respectively, thesample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140% for organics (+/-50% surrogates)and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics and speciated phenols is acceptable.

Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted during sampleextraction.

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency to meetor exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix spike recoveries forthe batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria


R00Revision No:

Page | 16 of 16





Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964

Organochlorine P

esticides

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID





5 DW1 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35331 X

6 DW2 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35332 X

7 DW3 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35333 X

8 DW4 Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35334 X







ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] web : www.eurofins.com.au

MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh Vic 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271



PerthPerthPerthPerth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261 Site # 23736

Environmental LaboratoryAir AnalysisWater AnalysisSoil Contamination Analysis

NATA AccreditationStack Emission Sampling & AnalysisTrade Waste Sampling & AnalysisGroundwater Sampling & Analysis

38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience

Sample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt Advice

Company name: Geotest ServicesGeotest ServicesGeotest ServicesGeotest Services

Contact name: Dave Spasojevic-All Results

Project name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDS

Project ID: P30868.4 A

COC number: Not provided

Turn around time: 1 Day

Date/Time received: Nov 22, 2017 4:45 PM

Eurofins | mgt reference: 573753573753573753573753

Sample informationSample informationSample informationSample information

☑ A detailed list of analytes logged into our LIMS, is included in the attached summary table.

☑ Sample Temperature of a random sample selected from the batch as recorded by Eurofins | mgtSample Receipt : 21.5 degrees Celsius.

☑ All samples have been received as described on the above COC.

☑ COC has been completed correctly.

☑ Attempt to chill was evident.

☑ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.

☑ All samples were received in good condition.

☑ Samples have been provided with adequate time to commence analysis in accordance with therelevant holding times.

☑ Appropriate sample containers have been used.

☒ Split sample sent to requested external lab.

☒ Some samples have been subcontracted.

N/A Custody Seals intact (if used).

Contact notesContact notesContact notesContact notes

If you have any questions with respect to these samples please contact:

Andrew Black on Phone : (+61) 2 9900 8490 or by e.mail: [email protected]

Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to Dave Spasojevic-All Results [email protected].

Note: A copy of these results will also be delivered to the general Geotest Services email address.





Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

1 HA1-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25972 X

2 HA1-2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25973 X

3 HA1-3 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25974 X

4 HA1-4 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25975 X

5 HA1-5 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25976 X

6 HA1-6 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25977 X

7 SA1-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25978 X

8 SA1-2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25979 X

9 SA1-3 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25980 X










Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964





10 SA1-4 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25981 X

11 SA1-5 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25982 X

12 SAW-1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25983 X

13 SAW-2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25984 X

14 SAW-3 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25985 X

15 ASB1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25986 X

16 ASB2 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No25987 X

Test Counts 16

















Project name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDS

Project ID: P30868.4 B



Date/Time received: Nov 22, 2017 4:45 PM








☑ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.














Project Name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RD SCHOFIELDSProject ID: P30868.4 B


Sample Detail

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

13

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

15

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID







7 DUP1 Nov 21, 2017 Soil S17-No26060 X X










7. FIELD TEST PIT SUMMARY LOGS

Field logs Register

Field Logs Register 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofield NSW

P30868.3_R01

P30868.3_R01 CLEARSTATE DEV. Co. Data Gap Investigation 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields, NSW

27/10/2017

C1

Depth (m) Sample Description Additional Observations

0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5

Topsoil; Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, dry, soft Silty CLAY, brown/red, moist, stiff

(Surface Vegetation)

Test Pit Terminated @ 0.5m bgl

C2


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




C3


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




C4


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




C5


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




C6


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




C7


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




C8


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




Field logs Register


P30868.3_R01

C9


0.0-0.2 0.2-0.4

Topsoil; Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, dry, soft Silty CLAY, brown, moist, stiff



C10


0.0-0.2 0.2-0.4

Topsoil; Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, dry, soft Silty CLAY, brown, moist, stiff



DW1


0.0-0.2 0.2-0.4

FILL; Sandy Gravel, grey Silty CLAY, brown/red, moist, stiff

Roadbase, Gravel comprises crushed rock and crushed concrete rubble


DW2


0.0-0.4 0.4-0.6




DW3


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




DW4


0.0-0.4 0.4-0.6




OBS1


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




OBS2


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




Field logs Register


P30868.3_R01

OBS3


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




OBS4


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




OBS5


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5

Fill; Sandy Gravel, grey Silty CLAY, brown/red, moist, stiff



OBS6


0.0-0.1 0.1-0.3




OBS7


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




OBS8


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




OBS9


0.0-0.5 0.5-0.7

Fill; Sandy Gravel, grey Silty CLAY, brown, moist, stiff

Roadbase, Gravel is described as crushed rock


OBS10


0.0-0.4 0.4-0.6




OBS11


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5




Field logs Register


P30868.3_R01

OBS12


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5







8. WASTE DISPOSAL DOCUMENTATION

~sue2 ~~cz R~cy. n9 & Reccv4r; Pt~ ltd

El1zabtm Ori,e ~a1t, ~,..gtacnt c.,,:r,. . 172S fl1z•btth Or(ve K~~ Creek ~SW 2175

l't!OM: 1300 6Sl 116 ,t.!lll: 70 002 902 6SO

o.livery !loHH

Ti~ht Ho: EOl1042010 1.0 Tl~e I~: 16/10/2017 9:27:17 ~ Tl..e O..t: 16/10/2017 ~:•l:31 ~ Vehicle RCfOl ILOSQZ

;OQ~4S • COll~TC Ou«>lITION Ci.•t ref:

Asbutos - 80 16 2.36~

so"'ru: htemal o.st: Elln~th Orivt <;e-t,eral GROSS TAR[ NE- 11,e•ght:

Char;ea~l• wel~ht: [1ch !t~ wetont:

Total (tx Ci$T); GST

Total Pdee:

w.ute, &.-46t ,.cat 2.Ut

2.38t O.OOt

--·~·- Pa~ent Details··---····-·--

Total MlOunt Tendered: Change Ghen:

SµBCONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT REGARDING WORKER'S COMPENSATION, PAYROLL TAX AND

REMUNERATION (Notel - see back of form)

For the purposes of this Statement a "subcontractor" is a person (or other legal entity) that has entered into a contract with a "principal contractor" to carry out work.

This Statement must be signed by a "subcontractor" ( or by a person who is authorised, or held out as being authorised, to sign the statement by the subcontractor) referred to in any of s1758 Workers Compensation Act 1987, Schedule 2 Part 5 Payroll Tax Act 2007, and s127 Industrial Relations Act J996where the "subcontractor" has employed or engaged workers or subcontractors during the period of the contract to which the form applies under the relevant Act(s). The signed Statement is to be submitted to the relevant principal contractor.

SUBCONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT (Refer to the back of this form for Notes, period of Statement retention, and Offences under various Acts.

Subcontractor: J~~r9t~~r:1 .. S?.1/:1~9f.~~ .... .................................................................... ABN: .~~-~Q~Q~?.:1~~ .... .

of .~~~.~P.!".i.1:19.~~~~ .. ~~., .. ~~!!~~ . ~~~~~ ....................................... ..... ..................................... .......................... .......... . I

has entered into a contract with ..i)~.A .... \~·h0.~.;:h.0~-} ...................... ........... ABN: ................ (.N~t~ .. 2

)

Contract number /identifier .. ..... J. 0. .~ .......... \9..?:. .~ $ .. .. : ........ .. ................ ....................... .. ..... .............. .......... .

Th' St t t f' t kb tw \<,o /\O /1. -1 d 1~, 1~ ,,-1 · I · Is a emen app Ies or wor e een: ..................... _an ...................... inc usIve,

subject of the payment claim dated; .~:?.t..!.:?t.~.7.

(Note 3)

(Note 4)

(Note 5)

I, .~i.~~.!.~.l!.r:i:1.~ .................................................................. a Director or a person authorised by the Subcontractor on whose behalf this declaration is made, hereby declare that I am in a position to know the truth of the matters which are contained in this Subcontractor's Statement and declare the following to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(a) The abovementioned Subcontractor has either employed or engaged workers or subcontractors during the above period of this contract. nck [.r] if true and comply with (b) to (g) below, as applicable. If it is not the case that workers or subcontractors are involved or you are an exempt employer for workers compensation purposes tick [ ] and only complete (f) and (g) below. You must tick one box. {Note 6)

(b) All workers compensation insurance premiums payable by the Subcontractor in respect of the work done under the contract have been paid. The Certificate of Currency for that insurance is attached and is dated ~~ . ./.q~./ .. P (Note 7)

(c) All remuneration payable to relevant employees for work under the contract for the above period has been paid. (Note 8)

(d) Where the Subcontractor is required to be registered as an employer under the Payroll Tax Act 2007, the Subcontractor has paid all payroll tax due in respect of employees who performed work under the contract, as required at the date of this Subcontractor's Statement. (Note 9)

(e) Where the Subcontractor is also a principal contractor in connection with the work, the Subcontractor has in its capacity of principal contractor been given a written Subcontractor's Statement by its subcontractor(s) in connection wi~JJt _work for ~e period stated above. (Note 10)

(f) Signature ..... ........ (..R..~ ........... ....... .. ...... Full name .. ~i.~ .I~.½1.r:i:1.<:' ............... ......... ....... ...... .... ... ... ... ..

(g) Position/Title .Qffi~e .. ".".l.a.r:i.c:39!? .................... ...... .............. ........ ............... ........ ......... ... Date?~ / .(~ .. /(?.

NOTE: Where required above, this Statement must be accompanied by the relevant Certificate of Currency to comply with section 1758 of the Workers Compensation Act I 987.

Version 2

= = ~

0

"' .,, "' g ... N ,._ ,._ (Tl

0

~ a:

I

8 a' "' a:

I

6 6 00 8

> V z w 0: 0: :J u

I ... a w u

I ~. 2

• ICaJ---e· 'workers insurance certificate of currency nsw

LISA TEUMA

EVERGREEN EARTHWORKS PTY LTD 40B SPRINGWOOO RD AGNES BANKS NSW 2753

Dear Sir/ Madam

policy number

111454 101

legal name

abn

issue date 14/06/17

print date 14/ 06/ 17

valid until 30/06/2018

EVERGREEN EARTHWORKS PTY LTD

acn [ trading name ] 62 105 087 429 105 087 429

, ' industTy classification number (WIC) industry

4 21020

._n_u_m_b_e_r_o_f_w_o_r_k_e_r_s_,: _________ ,, ( wagH•

• Number of workers includes contractors/deemed workers + Total wages estimated for the curren t per iod

Site Preparat ion Services

$736,203.81 ]

i111portant infor111ation Principals relying on this certificate should ensure 1t is accompanied by a statement under section 1758 of the Worker s Compensation Act 1987 (NSW). Principals should also check and sut is fy t hemselves thet the ,nformat,on is

correct and ensure that the proper wo rkers compensation

insurance is in place, ie. comp are the number of emplo yees

on site t o the average number of emp loyees est imated: ensure that th e wages are reasonable to cover the labour component of the work being performed : and conf irm

t hat the description of t he industry/industries noted is appropriate.

A princi pal contractor may become liable for any outstand ing p remium of the sub-contractor if t he principal has fa iled t o obta in a sta tement or has accepted a statement where there was reason to oelieve rt was false.

Yo urs faithfully,

Jason McLaughlin

General Manager. Loss Preventron & Pricing

1care· 1s the brand of Insurance & Care NSW and acts for th~ Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer ASN 83 564 379 108

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I

. -~

··-:·.

Sustainable Resource Centre

CN R HASSAL L ST & WIDEMERE ROAD

WET HERIL.L PARI< NSW 2164

Fairfield City Council ABN 83 140 439 239

Docket: SRC184377\1 REPRINT

·-····· ····-···-· ··--·-· - ---------Date Started

Date Completed

Operator

Customer

Vehicle

Vehicle Type

Thu, 19 Oct 2017 1 -54 PM

Thu 19Oct 2017 1.54PM

mikarnu 1

EVERGREEN EARTHWORKS F·TY LTD

EE0S:>0

Transporter Self

Order No

Debtor Code 42050 4CJ

Job Location Scholt10lds ----- ---Clean Concrete (Light Steel) (Cat2)

·---------- -· ··- · --------~------Gross 38980 kg Tare 18240 kg Stored

Net 20740 kg

II 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 SR<' I 8-1.'\77 -I

··---- -- ----· .. --------- -~---- ··-Driver's S ignature

--- - -···---- ·-·- -- . -- ------ ----- -· RF.S.:>UPCE RECOVERY E XF.MPTION

STATEMENT OF COMPUANCE All 1.11 ocessed recycled products hilve been tested

and are supplied compliant to EPA Resource Recovery Exempt ions and Ord1srs - please checl1

the Environmental Protection Al, tholity NSW webs ite for the latest vtirsians of the Rtosource

Recove 1)'Exemptions and Orders purtainingto this product To ensur e you comply with the consumer

respons1b ilitias go to wwvuipa nsw gov au •waste 'Reco·,t1ryOrders .htm Environmental Compliance and Geo -Technical test

reports are available upon request

Prrnted Thu. 19 Oct 2017 1 56 PM ---

,.-,•Y' :,_ .r ..... v:·~- .

.:-.. ·· / ~~····

i ,,_ " f" f !' .· . . ,' . r <-l. t y :-i ., ;:) ,. (1 ., . .. • lt,.,.,t j :, ': t ~;,,;, ~ .,,.,.,. .. : : .. ' •'• .. ,• ,• : ~ : : '; . : ..

Sustainable Resource Centre

C N R H.A.SSAL L ST & WIDE ME RE ROAD

WET HEnll.L PAl~K NSW 2164

F airf ie1d City Council ABN 83 140 439 239

- ... - .. --~----·-------- -- ~------ - --Docket : SRC 184324\ 1

,'?EPRl/1.'T ---·- --· ----~--------

Date Started

Date Completed

T hu 19 O;-;t '.2017 12·25 PM

Thu 1.-· Oct 2017 12:25 PM

Operator r.11!--amu1

t~nstomer EVERGREEN EARTHWORKS PTY L Tl.J ·.,

Vahtcle EEi< 104

Vehicle Type

Transf>orta, Sti lf

Order No

Debtor Code 42u50 .,m --~----· - - ------------··--·- -elean Concrete (Light .~tael) (Cat2)

- - - . - -----·--· ---- ------· Gross 39400 kg Tare 18120 kg Stored

Net 21280 kg

II IIII I Ill I 11111111111111111111111111111111 SRC'l8-13:!4 I

Driver's Signature

- --- -- -- ----- ---- ----------RE SOURCE RECOVER'/' Ex EMPTION

STATEMENTOFCOMPUANCE All p1ocessed recycled p1 ociucts have been tsstt1d

ann are supplied c:0011 ,ant to EPA Resour.:fl Reco1,,a,y Exemptions ... ,n Orders - please ch..tcl,

thi, Er,vtronme~l;,,J Prot;iction Authority NS'/,/ w11bsite tor the latest v1Hs•ons of tht! Re,ou ,;t>

Recover yE,errptions ond Order!> p1srtain ins1 !;., this product To ensuru you cornply w;th the consumer

respons ibilities go 10 www ilpa.n~w go• au w.:,steIRecovt11yOrders.htm. Env11onmental Corr!i,il iance and C?: so -Ter:hnical test

reports ar11 av.:1lable upon rtque!>t. ·--·--·- --- --- -- ·-- ·--------·----

Printed Thu. 19 Oct .?01 7 12.27_P_M __ ___

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I

I

• ~IJ" 't" f-- :., I¼ 1:·• , I ·t. , IH ~

l M~n,c-rial Dr i ve, Swant1a nk, QLD 4)06

Ph. 0424 68 0 850 Ph . 0499 552 600

.A.BN Si. 062 888 082

Delivery Docket

57049

Date In: 23/ 10/20 1 7 7:5 5 :2 1.:..M

Date Out: 23/ i 0/201 7 7: 55 :2 11~H

Rego: EFO200

Client; Eve: green Earthworks

Vehicle T. : B DOUBLE

Order No:

Source: .NO SOUP.CE

Notes:

Operator: Cau

Waste Ty1,e

E'VERGREEN C&D

-- -- ---- - ------Gross WT: Ta te WT:

Net WT:

57.74 t 22 .60 t

35.14 t

AIRSAFE

PROJECT: 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields JOB NO: 38242

38242-5 Fencing - North-east of work area 0714 1510 100 0 <0.01

38242-6 Fencing - North-west of work area 0715 1511 100 0 <0.01

38242-7 Fencing - South-west of work area 0716 1512 100 0 <0.01

38242-8 Entrance - Fencing - South-east of work 0717 1513 100 0 <0.01 area

Method: Guidance Note on the Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres [NOHSC: 3003 (2005)] and in-house method AS101 - Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres.

Sampling: All samples have been taken by Airsafe personnel in accordance with the sampling plan detailed in method AS101.

Quality Control: A field blank is taken and analysed for each batch of samples.

Note: The results relate only to the samples tested. Times are provided for customer reference only and do not form part of the facility's accreditation for volume measurement.

Environmental Conditions: Air monitoring during the removal of asbestos contaminated soil.

Comment: These calculated concentrations are less than the reporting limit of 0.01 fibres/ml for control and exposure monitoring as stated in the Guidance Note on the Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres [NOHSC: 3003 (2005)).

A NATA

V WORLD RECOGNISED

ACCREDITATION

Accredited for compliance with 1S0/IEC 17025 - Testing. NATA accredited laboratory 2959. This report must not be reproduced except in full. Page 2 of 2

AIRSAFE

November 21 , 2017

DSA Contracting PO Box244 GALSTON NSW 2159

Your Reference: Job Number:

Attention:

Dear Adam,

TEST REPORT

17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields 38242

Adam Meacham

93 Beattie Street Balma1n NSW 204 1 Australia T 02 9555 9034 I F. 02 9555 9035 [email protected] I www.airsafe.net.au ABN 36 609 424 9<6

In accordance with your instructions, Airsafe conducted air monitoring for airborne asbestos fibres at the above site.

The following samples were processed on the dates indicated. Samples: 4 Filters Date of Sampling: 21/11/17 Date of Analysis: 21/11/17 Date of Preliminary Report Sent: Not Issued

The results are contained in the following pages of this report.

Should you have any queries regarding this report please contact the undersigned.

Yours faithfully AIRSAFE OHC PTY LTD

Benjamin Willetts Approved Counter and Signatory

A NATA

V WORLD RECOGNISED

ACCREDITATION

Accredited for compliance with 1SO/IEC 17025 - Testing. NATA accredited laboratory 2959. This report must not be reproduced except in full. Page 1 of 2

AIRSAFE

PROJECT: 17-19 Schofields Road, Schofields JOB NO: 38242

38242-1 Fencing - North-east of work area 0719 1605 100 0 <0.01

38242-2 Fencing - North-west of work area 0720 1606 100 0 <0.01

38242-3 Fencing - South-west of work area 0721 1607 100 0 <0.01

38242-4 Entrance - Fencing - South-east of work 0722 1608 100 0 <0.01 area

Method: Guidance Note on the Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres [NOHSC: 3003 (2005)) and in-house method AS101 - Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres.

Sampling: All samples have been taken by Airsafe personnel in accordance with the sampling plan detailed in method AS 101.

Quality Control: A field blank is taken and analysed for each batch of samples.

Note: The results relate only to the samples tested. Times are provided for customer reference only and do not form part of the facility's accreditation for volume measurement.

Environmental Conditions: Air monitoring during the removal of asbestos contaminated soil.

Comment: These calculated concentrations are less than the reporting limit of 0.01 fibres/ml for control and exposure monitoring as stated in the Guidance Note on the Membrane Filter Method for Estimating Airborne Asbestos Fibres [NOHSC: 3003 (2005)).

A NATA

V WOALO RECOGNISED

ACCREDITATION

Accredited for compliance with 1S0/IEC 17025 - Testing. NATA accredited laboratory 2959. This report must not be reproduced except in full. Page 2 of2

AIRSAFE

November 20, 2017

DSA Contracting PO Box 244 GALSTON NSW 2159

Your Reference: Job Number:

Attention:

Dear Adam,

TEST REPORT

17-19 Schofields Road , Schofields 38242

Adam Meacham

93 Beattie Street Balma1n NSW 204 1 Australia

r. 02 9555 9034 I F. 02 9555 9035

[email protected] I www.airsafe.net.au AB'~ 36 609 •24 9<6

In accordance with your instructions, Airsafe conducted air monitoring for airborne asbestos fibres at the above site.

The following samples were processed on the dates indicated. Samples: 4 Filters Date of Sampling: 20/11 /17 Date of Analysis: 20/11/17 Date of Preliminary Report Sent: Not Issued

The results are contained in the following pages of this report.

Should you have any queries regarding this report please contact the undersigned.

Yours faithfully AIRSAFE OHC PTY LTD

Benjamin Willetts Approved Counter and Signatory

A NATA

V "'-'OALO AECOONIS(D ACCREDITATION

Accredited for compliance with 1S0/IEC 17025 - Testing. NATA accredited laboratory 2959. This report must not be reproduced except in full. Page 1 of 2

Er·skine Park ENVIROIJIJAAO PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DO::KET

Printed: 20/11/2017 8:37 AM

Docket: E 158269811 Date : 20/11/2017 o .•. , AM ~erator: Steve

Custcoer Na1e BUJ< TRANSPOOT SOC.UTIONS Custcoer ABN 54142248520 Address Suburb Destination Vehic·le CK18KR Carrier Order No 137791

PrOOJCt Net NSW_lsbestA17106 A8AC2 100 31. 12 Apprc,val No. A1 71C,6

Gross 48 .56 Tare 17 .44 Stored. E

Net 31 . 12

••• •• • 137791

Ptcl'up AddK~"

.i

BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS

/-:/.. S c..ot10,cc,u::J LtJ R !:.c 1--( OA··t'ZPJ D:l i~ct') Address

1:-/-~,c., /\J'l-p Mil Molcrial QuarrJ,/Landn ll Oncl.t l 11

G;.J-A _q.21_q[

81

// // Customer Sigl'i. /f( / Cus\mnt<r Priut

.

Gtu a- Laed:(111~Cvf'•

Coodiuo•,11fltirt "'h1k~l~..,1Uu\;rtll u t AT:-: .. r>J"IC"f'"nw~:. M4y.h-n.o, c oso\l(

Tonnes

.3,/---12

Coadi1ieo, 11f."1-h1triah , BTSwJI :J.h,,":'m~·m1l1 h> \bf- 1;,c-,11\.-1:.or.:i rci.,rotc:J li} 1.'( CU'r',~""kl <Al<"t ::.Men:I bu lt«n aettp:c.:l 1h, ('Ul.10ffli:C 11 ftr.lOIUrbh L, 11$ ,n,~U!tOfl

n ua r;r,-..:.o"'t~tmi~·l.ut ~4 14._"l;,4,i...-.,,:,o (.2~E-..'~'"111

I I

I

i

I

••• •• • 1, 100#90-uAM~....-.cn._•,,,.,,., r,z.;-~J~,,o l."J:157:;sn .. J:OF..,JOJ1 ~"'1,')'lw.NSir,•216tl :A.•-:t":)"'l~v.,:,·•C'Clr;..;

E:.rskJne Park ENVIROOUARI> FTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELJVERY DOCKET

Printed: 20/11/2017 11:01 AH

Docket: El582717\1 Date: 20/11/2017 11 :01 AH ~rator: Steve

Custcmer Naie Cust,..,r ABN Mchss Suburb Destination Vehicle Carrier

8LU TRANSPORT SIX.UT!ONS 54142248520

Order No

CIOBXR

137792

Net Prodl.ct NSW_l.sbestA 1710€ Apprc,val No.

ABAC2 100 28. 04

A 171(6

Gross Tera

Net

45.82 17. 78 Expired

28.04

C ustomt't S1!,,'1l

\\t1l1,-M!uC<>rr

lU

••• •• • ·•.

Cuc:tNncr Print

1'3779?

Job"'lo

2..

P,al. -h ,o1,.(•,P:

Co...sirioo• or fLn. \1\11111: lJ.!) l\·il, uh~\<art, ISi~., , 11>1 l"p'll1flb, 101 an, 0-\, .. rc .. 1,,~ ('.-dlriou of Ma1Cfl1t,· :n~ 1till d,,,hvu mlltmJ~ •-.1 1k •p,:-c,fi.c•!"n, t~I'""• d ti,. tti.: ," ,,u..,.. ox, no ~-,1 tlAI b«1 1.,;-q\1!11 LI t LV~.r.,ttf I~ rn,""C'lt,i',I.: r1,1 IIJ awJ,ca·~

... ••• Ii

•• • ? . l T, ,..,.._.,~ f"~,,...,... 1'""1 ,•.n "'4 14;>;.At,1 "'.->~ 025:(,.:511 11

1,'10.'l~..,~•~ ~ • lW11• tw1...,ryl'\$1tJ,7"'') C2 3-:,1: '5i77 f'Cf,'..c,,~1,<t P,.,.,.,...~-N',\\'7'f!.J h, lt."M•l:t'lhri '.0¥,U'tr•I

~~·""-'i"""

Erskine Park fNV JROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Printed : 20/1 1/2017 12 :39 PM

Docket : El582734\2 Date : 20/11/2017 12:3g PH Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Na,.e BUU< lRANSPCllT SOLUTIONS C\Js tc .. er ABN 54142248520 Addr~ss Suburb Destination Vehic.le CK181(R Carrier Order No ·37793

Prodlk:t Net NSW_lsbestA17106 A8AC2 100 35.30 Apprnval No. A171(16

Gross 53. 08 Tare 17. 78 Stored,E

Net 35 .30

Wblk. Of:°1CtC'op}

l!Ba •• • BULK TRANSPORT

SOLUTIONS

137793

Regn

Onk, ~o ~ h • i ,(' Approtral !\o - ~ - ~c.;.,~ -~ -

Job So

'l..

Cu,;!ollle r Pr 1111

CM1ditifl11 ef llln-; Wt:.ik BTS '" 1111,M" •!I un:. f>TS"' """ n-,,. 1,-.t-/. l.. 1111,- d..u"'gc."" .,.~ CoedltlWli ll~hftt i.,.h: l:11:i. .1.·1IIOl'-•tl'rt:.1.t-tuls 1:. U:.:- ~.r!"t.."l'IU!'IJ fQll..,c,tn:b~".!c ,u la,rr., ,,.,_, 1. ... 1,:iu

lu,:,b,,_,,,ll['[trfC,' lht 1~-~:,n.c:c II K'<j'Of~II": ftl. IU (JY," ,(',ill<w1

••• ir: •• • St,i Trn:.P011,~,b,Y--!l-t1.1.;l 5" 1"-C2-e!!:c::;

1_, 03S..l"Ql.rl!l-loloMnctw-t,,r,,w:;it.i2770 Oc9E.t!>7ll c-.>95n,5777

Er-sk ine Par-k ENV!ROGUARO PlY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Printed: 20/11/2017 2:23 PM

Docket: E 1582750\ 1 Date: 20/ 11 /2017 2:23 FM Operator: Steve

Custc<lllar Name Custceer ABN Addrfss S<butb Destination Yehle.le

Bl.tk TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS 54142248520

CK lBKR

!37794 Cerri er Order No

ProdLct NSW_l sbestA 17106 Apprc,val No. Al7!M

Net ABAC2 100 3!.00

Gross 48 . 78 Tare 17. 78 Stored

Net 31.00

137794

Da1c


::, ;: ~

/

OruerNo jj ( 1-~ C.l Apprcn .,l No J _ _ ~ _ 'J.OJ!:!1_ {K )tK~ BTS Cusiomcr r)SH ______ .,-______ l~J-o_:Z~"-

0

__

Pi.:ku11 Address / / . / / , J I 7 t:.liO(t'(f!://o'IJ ;<'C/J

M•terial

CuslQ:ner Prin1

\Ii ~ .. ir. om ... T CQP:

r~dJt~, ol H,rr: \\1~Jc, I-Il l- "ii.Lal,~ It.in RT'i • -.,1,... .. -.,.,<l,I,. (.,. ., ) ch•ML'< ,~ ,11,-

Ce,ridJtig,n, 11rr<ihtr,i1I, : 0~ .. ill tkh•tt mM,n.11> bJ!w ifC'• fi,-• ·wc1 1cquu.i,e,J b, 1tt ."'-'Ml.'mcr, 011tr m.1~] ~ I bn1111:t~e.J CM c-...1~'.Uf If f'C$P,Ul"l( fot :~ U>?:X-;lll.NI

••• £1 •• • 1_ -·o:~s.i~,11. ~1Mnct,,t.~~, ... s·h:n.•·J t::.:ie:>!5717 :.rR.,,.<l.,:!Jt Q.r1.,,)._:_ ,~-;.•;;;7,:,:. tvl\l•r•"10-~;,c,,~c~<T !I~

Erskine Park ENVIROOUAAD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOO(EI

Printed: 20/1 1/2017 , :25 PII

Doclcet: E1582751\1 Date : 20/11/ 2017 2:25 PM ~rator: Stev·

CUs tc«r MMe Custccer ABN Addnss SLOUrb Destination Vehicle

BlU IRANSl'ORI SClUTll»IS 54142248'.i20

Cerri er Order llo

Product

CKJOIB

137946

Nat NSM lsbestA17106 App~c,val No. A171('6

A8AC2 100 ~0. 94

Gross 58. 70 Tare 17. 76 Stored

Net 40.94

Oa1e

?c 1t l

mi l!I !I I!! •• •


Otli~~ry Atkb:·"-5

(l(::"u.1UL

;11attrial

Cu1.u1nc, Pnnl

137946

I

-, ,;:/cJs I J~li ----

Tonnes

l NchMoi•r llln · \l\"1 1leblS ... 11 ,u. .. 1il .. 1tt h TS .,--~ '\)It-Ir r,.-1'1\ ci..,, .. ,.,(j,I .. ' l_.n.ft, •Ohtt~ bl~"'•*,., -nw.,tob:._.r;._,.i..•N:11l"oYl'o'f\lb . ·=c,W...'11rl (!li.Cr.....,,_. "1,, t-.-.:qtK.""' ,;.;<l', '>I I' IN"""«uk( lV-'> If';,,. .....

••• •• • ik• T -....,.1.5',.,y.-._ Ptl' ..W :,.: 1.t.• •14~ ~ :1

1,- ·0J~R:»eltM'Ql,.-b.r,~·N.l/ l:J

~ ~~. , ,, 1

0.,,1:,bl';)~/lf

Er-sk ine Par-k ENV!ROOUAAD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY OIJCl(El

Pr inted: 20/11/2017 12:27 PM

Docket: E1582730\1 Date: 20/11/2017 12:27 PM Opero tor: Steve

Custc~er Name Custcaer ABN Addr,ss Suburb Destlnotlon Vehicle Carrier

BULK TRANSPORT SO..UT IONS 54142248520

Order No

CM30T8

137945

Net Product NS~_lsbestA 17106 Approval No. A171C6

ABAC2 100 41.58

Gross Tare

Net

59.34 17. 76 Stored

41.58

l!IH!! •• •• • 137945


Date Rego

-:Ju 11-1 C / \1 Sui OrJc.>r~1.• ---,-+·~~-~-~-

/qi? t u{, Appro\J\ ~o - ~-----~~~

OTS Customc:, m,9 f ,/1

P1clcup Addrus <' J / -:; -.JC/,c,0

Tonnes

1-11 s~

CuslOmcr Sign

~ lt.itt . Ofh-c Copy

Cen4Hio,u of Hirt: \\'r.lk 8TS .... r uk l'1 uu, BT._" r..;1 r . ;,,.,ru-,Mt M' ~r" ~'"'J( .,n 111c

Cfl!lllfI<lnl of Malt1iab: DTS '" IC d,e:,· n c-.11:n!)J J I.:.' ~ c l,p(':;1f..,.a1.o.u 11"q11esm!b- tlithiolurn:1. vrl(c n1J10-:,1,

hu b.:t-1 t«c-r lfld L'v CUU,..l',(I l)fnr,.)'Jl',I( Mr Ill illfl ..:.itlu"

···~ •• • S-J~T·o,s;.vtS.A,t.o'>•Pl,ltd ~41.to;'i.'"S~O ~t,,,.·,:::1,··

'.,·lOJS:.-,.:,rt.t: R.-,,,,,Mw--it:nr.O!Jr)'"<:".\:.l. l70 O..Yl.f':~JIJ POG,. ..;~31 StM.l,y.lb":ft..SW.ac?G() ~ --tv~.kO,.,:.o,n~~- »~

Erskine Park ENVIROOUAAD PTY L 1D

23 060 919 164

DcLIVERY DOO<ET

Printed: 20/11/ 2017 10:36 Ali

Docket: El582716\1 Date: 20/11/2017 10:36 AM Operator: Steve

Custcoer Na,ie CUstc.,er ABN Address Suburb Destination Vehicle Cerr1er

BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS 54142248520

CM301B

Order Ho 137\344

Net Prodl.::t NSWJsbestA 17106 Apprnval No. A171C6

ABAC2 100 38.98

Gross Tare

Net

56. 74 17. 76 Stored

38 .98

o,uc

(<.) ;II :f


137944

Rego OrC.er '.'Jo ----'<"~=---,--~ -C 1i13vT/J Ap?ro,,l~o__f::!._~l_?~_/ o(=·~·-

fob No

IJc h,·C!) Aire \<:.

C . «:, ''<°-I '-".Jc;

Cu\to:nc, Si,1;11 Cu,tu111cr Prini

Wlti1t- Off.,~C'-l')

c .. d,ti.n)•fHmr: \\1.ik RlS ,.,11;,a•~ .i:c.r: DTS1>not rctpJoC'llllblt 1..- 1).) lllu,..c.:, 11!t"

Caadld.a.,of\h1trbh:!flSll"lll«h~er~cr11l11rd'ltsp«•f-.11.-... "'l'"'ri'"''h.-.- ....... ~. ;,,. h#bftn;\C<~lhc-c1uircwt11:up.'.l'U ,~fot•"•~~,u,.,,

••• •• • C\,1.l,.,•IH\~~F\t~lll ~14i::'C.J$~J l,k-;r~:_i]111

v1ro&.-_.-oan>,,H,,. .. ..: ,....,., ~s-.v2n: O;.:! ~t:,~:in1 ~B>• .;.03, S:M.v,-l'.-..."lf!N/2750 b,\u.,,"'...,1.o.,1.lv•:::,'T'ta,•

Erskine Park EN'/ !ROlllJARO PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Printed: 20/ 11/2017 8:35 AM

Docket: El582697\I Date: 20/11/2017 8:35 AM Operator: Steve

Custcmer Neme Custc,mer ABN Adchss Suburb Destination Vehicle Carrier

BULK TRANSPORT S!l.UT I OIIS 54142248520

CM30TB

137943 (Jrder No

Product Net NSWJsbestA 17106 ABAC2 100 36 .88 Apprc,val No. A171C•6

Gross 54.64 1 are 17. 76 Stored

Net 36.88

'1u J/ ,

BTS Cu<'.omcr

;.)S r t

Ot-li\C'r)' Addre~li

~l!I!!! '"'

•• • 13794 3


Rogo Order ~o. ---,;7'1-,'r-:--:~--,--,--

;j I ~ - 101 Appro,·al NC\ --'---- -"'-"C:'---

Job No

i

'--r=-:..· l....c&c..c..::-.,,.,...,__,1a=--=-=..u7

Materi31 Qu•n')fl•ndfill Oodm ft Tonnes

C5r-J-I} ft2..1qi1 61 ~6'f2

- -- -I' I

;

I Customer s ,~ j I .._

Customer rnnt

\ \ hltt-Off.nC.09>

(oaditiN.s a-rll itt. \1,-'l;lk BTS ,..,u till aJcn, l.1Ti ~ 004 rrsp:,M1bh: f« at.) i.111 .. r- c-~ J11:

CN dlth,.,, • f .'lbltf1,b: }fl :> 11>111 dc-bcr IN'<NIJ t,.\ -+t, t;ic.: ltc:.a•,.,.,i 1tq1,1r,lf\l I;, ttc N11(lnM. o,,t"~ r,,,tc\:11 h" 1'tth at.;cr,l(C lbt C ~._.,,..,,c I• ff".,-..)1 <.Wir k,r b lf'r A."'tiofl

a;,·

••• •• • ~Tr-..,r.f,l.S1$o;.~"P1.'..tJ 5,.t: IL~ 2"85.?C ~~571 11

1,'10G S..••?•ll1 RoodM,icJ,<rti1<,.."-S'.N ?770 Q; 96'!>':17'~ "C !3o, .. ::.JI 9.,-,_,,.~ E''htk'S-N i;ln,;: bv.C-.:11r-"°°u,oll\.'..(..l"GCOT IN

124552 ••• •• •


Date Rego

1.311>00{'< Order 1'io __.__,___:..___,c__ ____ _ _ Approval J\o _ _ ___ ___ _ _

UTS Custmycr

1:J}I/ ( b ,-J ,-/ I / } C ·,- ' ;._J ( Pickup Addre/ .

( 7 > £ 11 D / --,; I t..,r;:J S

Delivery Address

il.. j./( I,-., / ;

Material

Customer Sign

-~· . --• Whit, . om« Cop:,

Quarryll .andftll Dockcl #

Customer Print

./ ;, .,,. / ·' // t. ,· ,,. , V

Grnn • LnndfilllSp,are Copy

Job )lo.

' I

Tonnes

Pink . Uook Copv

C11 11 di1ions of Hir t : \\"hil..: 81S w,!11:,h all ~arc. B ! !, is no1 rc<po:is1blc fo, a.,) dJm.:g" on j lll

(.011tlition• of Ma1c11ab· OTS w1U dct,,c:1 ffi.lter.ah ,.~ :he sr ccifa;.:ati..:-ns rrGuC~ted b) 1he .:mt Oft'K.:f \-.~t: m .. .11co"I

hM b:c:1, ac,epc~d the c:us:omc1 ,1,, r:sp01mblc fm 1b o&fphcation

•• •• • 8 u lTransp0rt !;.-,lit.JO"ls Ptyltj 5.! i 42 2 4Q:>2C 02 YE257i1 1

',/ 108 S.rgeitS "le aJ -,1,oc1,.nbur1 ~W27TJ 02 967!', ~/'/ / ;,c Box 4031 SL Mai)',, E6n t,,:5'vV 2760 b•.Ja.-an~J'O'"tSCII.U"rsccrr ;u

Erski ne Park ENVJROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Printed: 20/11/2017 7:57 AM

Docket: EI582694\1 Date : 20/11/2017 7:57 AM Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Name Custc,mer ABN Addre,ss Suburb Destination Vehlc:le Carrier

BllK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS 54142248520

Order· No

8B0063

124552

Ne t Product NSW_l,sbestA 17106 Apprc,val No.

ABAC2 100 29 .98

A 171(16

Gross Tare

Net

46.12 16.14 Stored.E

29.98

,.

••• •• • 124 553


Dale Rego Order Ko.

)v ·fl /S/jc>o6:, Approval No.

BTS Cuslomcr

lJ s/.l (:.i,... - 1 c- , (, { fl .. . ' , ,,_,

Pickup Address

!:::> c ,~ c.> , _:/~ I L 0 ~ Del ivery Address

.·/1...Sit,r-,,:

Material Quarry/Landfill Docket #

c..~ _s: i -...1 · - A 5b1., oJ

Joh Ko.

I

,.,, , .. . ~ . ..

Tonnes

JC/ ·6c ,.

~¥7~707

Customer Sigo

,:;------::->g-;_· :; / --- -"-- ..;""

Whil1:- 0ffcc Cop) Ydlow - Cun omer Copy

Customer Print

/_,;r- · / · 1,1

C retn - L~odfill'Spare Cop)' Pinlk - HooA Copy

CondHiom of Hire: W hi le BTS "11\ take all <'!re OTS is not ,csponsible for any damage on Sit~.

Condhioo:i. o r ;\1iu~ri2ils: DTS \\'Ill ddh c1 m.,len.JIS 10th~ spc\;1fo.:auons rc-qu:s1~d by 1t:c cuiaomer. 00\.,(' m.atcrul

ha.'i b«n .-: cepted 1hc cu~tom:r is r--~pon)iblc: for 1:) :1p1)hca1il)n

89 1111 3cl. TransccicSel,,tiocsPty lto 5-114?248520 0?9625 7111

1/ 103 S1tr9en-:s h,c;d M1nc·1in:11,ry t-S"I ~170 02 967t 5777 PO EOll. .i:01~ &. Mury!i Cast NSW 2760 :>J'ktrenbfrOrtcikr..iors.ccn t!.J

Erskine Park ENV!ROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELI VERY DOCKET

Printed: 20/11/2017 9:56 AM

Docket: EI582707\1 Date: 20/11/2017 9:56 AM Operator: StElve

Custcimer Name Customer ABN Addreiss Suburb Destination Vehle:le Carrier


Order No

BB00~-

124553

Net Product NSW_l.sbestA 17106 Apprc,val No. A171(16

ABAC2 100 29.60

Gross Tare

Net

45.74 16.14 Stored.E

29.60

.,.,._ ... .., -

I \ I

I

\ \ i I

l i \

I I \.

Erskine Park ENVIROGUARD Pn' LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 2:25 PM

Docket: El582751\l Date: 20/11/2017 2:25 PM Operator: Steve

C.ustcimer Name Custc,mer ABN Addr£'5S Suburb Destination Vehicle Carrier Order No


CM30TB

137946

ProdLtCt Net NSWJsbestA17106 ABAC2 100 40.94 Apprc,val No. A 171(16

Gross 58.70 Tare · 17. 76 Stored

Net 40.94

Erskine Park ENVIROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 12:27 PM

Docket: EI582730\1 Date: 20/11/2017 12:27 PM Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Name BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS Custc,mer ABN 54142248520 Addrrss Suburb Destination Vehicle CMJOTB Carrier Order No 137945

Product Net NSW_tsbestA17106 ABAC2 100 41.58 .o.pprcival No. ~ 171(16

Gross 59.34 Tare 17.76 Stored

Net 41.58

Erskine Par-k ENVIROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 10:36 AM

Docket: El5B2716\1 Date: 20/ 11/2017 10:36 AM Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Name BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS Custc,11er ABN 54142248520 Addre-ss Suburb Destination Vehicle CH30TB Carrier Order No 137944

ProdL1ct Net NSWjsbestA 17106 AB/IC2 100 38.98 Apprc,val No. A171C<6

Gross 56. 74 Tare 17.76 Stored

Net 38.98


23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 8:35 AM

Docket: EI582697\1 Date: 20/11/20\i 8:35 AM Operator: Steve

Customer Name (ustc,mer ABN Address Suburb Destination Vehicle Carrier Order No


CH30TB

137943

Net ProdL'Ct NSWJsbestA17106 ~.pprc,val No.

ABAC2 100 36.88

A 171(,6

Gross Tare

Net

54.64 17. 76 Stored

36.88


23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 2:23 PM


Custc,mer Name Customer ABN Address Suburb Destination Vehicle Carrier


CK18KR

Order No 137794

Product Net NSW_P,sbestA 17106 ABAC2 100 31.00 Apprc,va l No. Al7W6

Gross Tare

Net

48.78 17.78 Stored

31.00


23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 12:39 PM


Customer Name Custc,mer ABN Address Suburb Destination Vehic:le


CK18KR Carrier Order No 137793

Product NSWJsbestA17106 ABAC2 Apprc,val No. A171Ct6

Gross Tare

Net

Net 100 35.30

53.08 17.78 Stored .E

35.30

Erskine Park ENVIROGUARO PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/ 2017 11:01 AM

Docket: Ef582717\1 Date: 20/11/2017 11 :01 AM Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Name BULi< TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS Cusfomer ABN 54142248520 Addr€<SS Suburb Destination Vehide CK18KR Carrier Order No 137792

Product NSW_AsbestA17106 Approval No. A171(!8

Net ABAC2 100 28.04

Gross Tare

Net

45.82 17. 78 Expi red

28.04


23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 20/11/2017 8:37 AM

Docket: EI582698\1 Date: 20/11/2017 8:37 AM Operator: Steve

Custcimer Name BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS Cusfomer ABN 54142248520 Addre,ss Suburb Destination Vehicle Ck 18KR Carrier Order· No 137791

Net Product NSW_tsbestA17106 Approval No.

ABAC2 100 31. 12

A 17106

Gross Tare

Net

48.56 17.44 Stored,E

31.12

Erskine Park ENVlROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164-

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 21/11/2017 11:20 AM .. Docket: £1582782\1 Data: 21/11/2017 11:20 AM Operator: Steve

eustomer Name Customer ABN Address Suburb Destination Vehic:le Carrier Order No


CM30TB-T

137949

Net Product NSW_tsbestAl7106 Apprc,val No. /\171(6

A8AC2 100 15 .72

Gross Tare

Net

25.82 10.10

15.72

Erskine ~ark ENVIROGUARO P1Y LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 21/11/2017 9:11 AM

Docket: £1582776\1 Date: 21/11/2017 9:11 AH Operator: Steve

Custcffler Name BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS Custc,mer ABN 54142248520 .6ddress Suburb Destination Vehie:le CH30TB Carrier Order No 137948

Produ~t Net NSWJsbestA17106 ABAC2 100 37.52 Apprc,val No. A171C<6

Gross Tare

Net

55.28 17.76 Stored

37.52

Erskine Park ENVIR8GUARD PT-Y LTD

23 080 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 21/11/2017 10:08 AH

Docket: El582779\1 Date: 21/11/2017 10:08 AH Operator: Steve

CustCJ11er Name BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS CUstcMr ABN 54142248520 Addrsss Suburb Destination Veh!e:le BB0063 Carrier Order No 124558

.,.. .. ProdL!Ct Net NSW_~sbestA17106 ABAC2 100 30.92 Apprc,val No. A171Ct6

Gross Tare

Net

47.06 16. 14 Stored.E

30.92

Erskine ·Park: ENVIROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Printed: 21/11/2017 8:02 AM

Docket: EI582770\1 Date: 21 /11/2017 8:02 AH Operator: Steve

Customer Name BUU( TRANSPOOT SOLUTIONS Custc,mer ABN 541422'18520 Addn-ss Suburb Destination Vehic.le B80063 Carrier Order No 124557

Product Net NSW_~sbestA17l06 ABAC2 100 29.20 Apprc,val No. A17106

Gross Tare

Net

45.34 16.14 Stored ,E

29.20

I

I

I I

Erskine Park ENVIRCJGUARO PT¥ LTD

23 060 919 164

DELI VERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 21/11/2017 12:43 PM

Docket: El582793\1 Date: 21 / 11/2017 12:43 PM Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Name Cus tc,mer ABN AddrfSS Suburb Destination Vehicle Carrier


BN43LT

1291t1 Order No

ProdL,ct Net NSW_tsbestAl7106 ABAC2 100 7.60 Apprc,va I No. A171('6

Gross 24. 14 Tare 16.54 Stored.E

Ne t 7.60

'"°':n ,b.;;.~.j,,\<'I C. C(:.,-n:~~

Erskine Par-k ENVIROGUARD PTY LTD

23 060 919 164

DELIVERY DOCKET

Copy 1 Printed: 21 / 11/2017 11 :20 AM

Docket: E!582783\1 Date: 21/11/2017 11:20 AH Operator: Steve

Custc,mer Name BULK TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS Custc,mer ABN 54142248520 AddrE-ss Suburb Destination Vehicle CH30TB-TLR Carri er Order No 137949

Product Net NSW_tsbestA17106 ABAC2 100 27.20 Apprc,va l No. A 171('6

Gross 34.92 Tare 7.72

Net 27.20

Client details

Name of client: Evergreen Earthworks

Client contact details: 0245 787156

Removal work details

Date removal work carried out: 13/10/2017

Site address where removal work is 17-19 Schofields Road Schofields 2762 being carried out:

Details of the specific asbestos * Removal of asbestos sheeting internally and externally of the removal work area(s): property

Name of licensed asbestos Kent Tomas rem ova list:

Name and contact details of licensed asbestos removalist supervisor (if different to removalist):

Inspection details

Date of clearance inspection: 13/10/2017 I Time of clearance inspection: 4:30 Pm

ASBESTOS REMOVAL WORK PAPERWORK Yes No

Do you have a copy of the asbestos removal control plan? X

Do you have a copy of the notification form? X

Is the removal work consistent with the control plan and the notification form? (e.g. use Yes of enclosures, decontamination facilities, waste facilities)

ASBESTOS REMOVAL WORK AREA Visual Inspection

Inspection of the specific area detailed in Section A found no visible asbestos X remaining as a result of the asbestos removal work carried out.

Was air monitoring required X

Can the area be reoccupied? X

Has additional information been attached? (e.g. photos, drawings, plans) X

CLEARANCE DECLARATION

I declare that:

• Inspection found no visible asbestos residue from asbestos removal work in the area, or in the vicinity of the area, where the work was carried out

• The area is safe for reoccupation and normal use

-Name: Michael Chidiac Signature: /~· Contact number: 1300 045 355 ABN : 63 606 596 169

Address: PO Box 295 Concord NSW 2137

Qualification: Asbestos Assessment (CPCCBC5014A) Certificate# 1138/2017




9. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS

Remedial Works Action Plan

17 & 19 Schofields Road Schofields NSW 2762 Lot 205 and Lot 206 in DP 1189773

Project Ref. P30868.1_R02

21st February 2017

Clearstate Developments Co.

Maurice Fitzpatrick

Level 1, 79-81 Chandos Street

St Leonards NSW 2065

Report Approved by:

David Spasojevic

General Manager

Geotest Services Pty Ltd.

ABN: 39 089 302 009 18/24 Garling Road, Kings Park NSW 2148

Tel: (02) 9671 4443 Fax: (02) 9671 4343

www.geotestservices.com.au

Remedial Action Plan (RAP) | 17&19 Schofields Rd Schofields NSW | P30868.1_R02 | 2 (A) – (Lot 205 in DP 1189773) (B) – (Lot 206 in DP 1189773)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This remedial action plan (RAP) prepared by Geotest Services for Clearstate Developments Co presents the work strategies and framework to be implemented during the remediation activities at the Site. The report was commissioned to address remediation requirements associated with the proposed low density metropolitan style residential subdivision at the Site. The Site is legally defined to include the following registered lots; Lot 205 and Lot 206 in DP 1189773, also identified as 17 & 19 Schofields Road Schofields NSW 2762.

The objective of this RAP is to provide the required remediation work framework and stipulate validation requirements to assist in the remediation of the site to render it suitable for use. To ensure the most suitable remediation strategy is derived to result in complying land-use conditions for the proposed residential development.

The NSW DECCW (OEH) 2011 outlines the primary objectives of a remediation plan to render a site suitable for the proposed use as;

Negate any appreciable risk of human exposure to contaminated soils or groundwater;

To halt the possible migration of contaminants at the site;

To ensure the site is rendered suitable for the intended land-use.

The desired site land use is Standard Residential – with soil access as described in the NEPC NEPM Guidelines 2013 Amendment No. 1; Schedule B1 – Guidelines on the investigation levels for soil and groundwater Table 1A(1) – Column A. This RAP provides the recommended controls and framework for undertaking remediation activities at the site. These aim to render it suitable for future residential land-use. Through successful implementation of the strategies outlined within this report the site should be suitable for its intended land use.

Geotest makes the following comments and closing remarks relating to the information within the RAP for the proposed development of 17&19 Schofields Rd ID (a), (b) Schofields:

All remediation works should be conducted by an experienced contractor whom holds the required licenses to safely complete the works

All demolition and HAZMAT works should be undertaken by a suitably licensed and competent DE-2 and AS-B (or AS-A) contractor

All stockpiled debris, junk and waste should be safely removed and lawfully disposed.

Known visual remediation has been detailed in this report. All areas of known contamination should be appropriately validated by an experienced consultant.

The potential for contamination and unsuitable soils in other areas of the site is considered possible. During stripping and excavation an environmental consultation should supervise the removal of all un-controlled fill materials.

This executive summary should be read in conjunction with the remainder of the report.


TABLE OF CONTENTS _Toc475393160 INTRODUCTION 5

1.1 Site Identification 5 1.2 Objectives of the Remediation Action Plan 5 1.3 The Remediation Goal 5 1.4 Scope of Works 5 PREVIOUS CONTAMINATION REPORTS 6

2.1 Preliminary Site Investigation 17&19 Schofields Rd Schofields, Geotest Services Ref. P30812.1_R01 February 2017 6

CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL (CSM) 7 3.1 Site Background 7 3.2 Future Site Use 7 3.3 Site Contamination Status 8 3.4 Contaminants of Concern - Mobilisation Pathways 8 3.5 Sensitive Receptors & Exposure Pathways 9 3.6 Previous Remediation Activities 10 REMEDIATION CRITERIA 11

Adopted Site Investigation Levels (SILs) Human Health Criteria 11 4.1 11 4.2 Aesthetic Criteria 11 Terrestrial 12 4.3 Ecological Criteria 12 4.3.1 Calculation of Site Specific Ecological Criteria 12 4.4 Groundwater 13 REMEDIATION STRATEGY 14

5.1 Strategy Analysis 14 5.2 Preferred remedial strategy 15 REMEDIATION WORKS 17

6.1 Remediation Extent 17 6.2 Site Specific Geology 17 6.3 Remediation Preliminaries 18 6.4 Site Setup 18 6.5 Workplace Health, Safety and the Environment 18 6.6 Remediation Activities & Excavation 19 6.7 Excavation, Segregation & Stockpiling 19 6.8 ACM remediation & physical waste removal for potential beneficial re-use 19 6.9 Validation Sampling Remediated Soils (excluding asbestos) 21 6.10 Validation of Excavations 21 6.11 Burial of Select Materials at Depth 22 6.12 Off-site transport and disposal 22 6.13 Site Re-instatement 22 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQOS) & ENVIRONMENTAL SITE VALIDATION 23

7.1 Validation Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) 23 7.1.1 Step 1: State the Problem 23 7.1.2 Step 2: Identify the Decisions 23 7.1.3 Step 3: Identify the Inputs to Decision 23 7.1.4 Step 4: Define the Study Boundaries 24 7.1.5 Step 5: Develop a Decision Rule 24 7.1.6 Step 6: Specify Limits on Decision Errors 25 7.1.7 Step 7: Optimise the Design for Obtaining Data 25 7.2 Imported Materials Validation 26 7.3 Validation Report 26


UNEXPECTED FINDS PROTOCOL 27 CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CEMP) 28

9.1 Principal Contractor Responsibilities 28 9.2 Hours of Site Operation 28 9.3 Site Amenities 28 9.4 EMP Preparation; Soil, Erosion, Sediment, Waste, Water, Runoff & Litter

Management Plans 28 9.5 Proposed temporary construction infrastructure 29 9.6 Traffic Control and Management Plans 29 9.7 Dust and Odour Management 29 9.8 Community Liaison and Complaints 30 REGULATORY APPROVALS 31

10.1 SEPP 55 Remediation of Land 31 10.2 Protection of the Environment Act (POEO) 1997 31 10.3 Site Audit Statement (SAS) 31 WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY (WHS) 32 SITE CONTACT DETAILS 33 CONCLUSIONS 34 REFERENCES 35 YOUR GEOTEST SERVICES DOCUMENT LIMITATIONS 36

TABLES

Table 1 – Adopted Site Criteria

FIGURES

Figure 1 – Site Locality (Geotest, 2017)

Figure 2 – Site Feature Plan (Geotest, 2017)

Figure 3 – Remediation Extent Plan

APPENDICES

Appendix A – Geotest Services; PSI Report, Ref. P308682.1_R01 January 2017


INTRODUCTION

This remedial action plan (RAP) prepared by Geotest Services for Clearstate Developments Co. presents the work strategies and framework to be implemented during the remediation activities at the Site. The report was commissioned by Maurice Fitzpatrick of Clearstate to address remediation requirements associated with the proposed low density metropolitan style residential subdivision at the Site.

1.1 Site Identification

The Site is legally defined to include two adjoining registered lots, their respective areas and unique report identifier’s:

Lot ID Street ID Area (approx) hectares Site Ref ID

Lot 205 in DP 1189773 17-19 Schofields Road 7800m2 (a)

Lot 206 in DP 1189773 17-19 Schofields Road 9000m2 (b)

Total approximate area (2 lots) 1.7 ha

The locality of the Site is presented in Figure 1 and a detailed layout of Site is presented in Figure 2.

1.2 Objectives of the Remediation Action Plan

The objective of this RAP is to provide the required remediation work framework and stipulate validation requirements to assist in the remediation of the site to render it suitable for use.

To ensure the most suitable remediation strategy is derived to result in complying land-use conditions for the proposed residential development.

1.3 The Remediation Goal

The NSW DECCW (OEH) 2011 outlines the primary objectives of a remediation plan to render a site suitable for the proposed use as:

Negate any appreciable risk of human exposure to contaminated soils or groundwater;

To halt the possible migration of contaminants at the site;

To ensure the site is rendered suitable for the intended land-use.

The desired site land use is Standard Residential – with soil access as described in the NEPC NEPM Guidelines 2013 Amendment No. 1; Schedule B1 – Guidelines on the investigation levels for soil and groundwater Table 1A(1) – Column A.

1.4 Scope of Works

The objectives of the RAP were achieved by undertaking the following scope of works which included:

Review of existing contamination reports made available for the site;

Address the nature and status of any land contamination at the site;

Identify any areas of uncertainty requiring further investigation;

Understand the data quality objectives (DQOs) to achieve the remediation goal;

Review and selection of the preferred remediation strategy at the site;

Provide site remediation procedures including occupational health and safety and adequate environment management during the works;

Outline the requirement for site environmental validation.


PREVIOUS CONTAMINATION REPORTS

2.1 Preliminary Site Investigation 17&19 Schofields Rd Schofields, Geotest Services Ref. P30868.1_R01 February 2017

Geotest Services Pty Ltd. (Geotest) was commissioned to undertake a Preliminary Contamination Investigation at the above mentioned site. Geotest state that their objective was to: the objective of the investigation was to preliminarily assess for the likelihood of contamination to exist on the Site. The objective was also to determine whether the Site would be suitable for future subdivision.

Geotest undertook a number of industry accepted desktop study findings to gain preliminary information on the site.

Geotest concluded that; based on the desktop investigation, site inspections and the observations made that the site may be considered suitable for future sub-division from a contamination perspective subject to further investigation, remediation and validation. This may be conducted during the re-development phase of works. We make the following recommendations for the next phase of works:

A Remediation Action Plan (RAP) is recommended to guide further investigation requirements and facilitate the remediation and validation;

The identified remediation drivers during the preliminary investigation are for asbestos and potentially contaminated, uncontrolled fill.

All demolition and remediation works should be undertaken by an appropriately licensed and experienced contractor

Following the decommissioning of the two site septic tanks, an inspection by environmental consultant should be made for the suitability of surrounding soils;

The site dam should be inspected following de-watering and an assessment of the sediment removed from the base prior to re-use at the site. Safe removal of any anthropogenic waste or debris (commonly found in farm dams) should be undertaken if encountered;

Geotest is not aware of any other reports relating to the site.


CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL (CSM)

3.1 Site Background

Historical and available information has been reviewed and summarised in Section 2 of this report. The proposed future land-use has been identified in Section 1 of this report.

3.2 Future Site Use

It is understood that the site will be sub-divided into numerous low density residential lots (~400m2 each). It is also expected that as part of the sub-division, a local road may be constructed, registered and provided to council. We are unsure of the total number of residential lots, current vs. final land-form and location of roads and utility easements. We have not received development plans for the site.


3.3 Site Contamination Status

Geotest have adopted the NEPM 2013 Amendment Table 1; Column 1 (HIL-A) thresholds for future remediation and validation purposes at the site. These will be the driver for remediation at the site. Based on our review of previous environmental reports (made available) we have identified the following contamination to be considered un-suitable for future residential land-use.

Site ID RAP Remediation Area

Investigation Locations

Contaminant of Potential Concern, Matrix & Future Action

Approx. depth of remediation (m bgl)

Approx. area of remediation (m2)

(a) Area 1 Former farm dam

Potential asbestos, metals impacts and OCP impacts from former market garden uses

Unknown (0.5m)

1,000

(b) Area 2 Central area of site on driveway

Asbestos materials present on surface and potentially extending into sub-soils, requiring further assessment/ management

Unknown (0.3m in fill only)

250

(b) Area 3 Under existing

house and shed

structures

COPC; TRH / BTEX, metals. Requires removal and further assessment/ management

Unknown (0.5m)

1,000

In addition to the above table the site has additional areas of domestic wastes, and other construction debris/ waste materials on the surface. We recommend appropriate safe removal and lawful disposal these wastes are undertaken during site preparation and demolition. Any further un-expected finds during this process should be quarantined and managed under the un-expected finds protocol.

Contaminated groundwater has not been identified as a concern based on the known contamination extents listed above. During remediation in the event of further significant contamination causing a groundwater risk, consideration to groundwater management should be given.

3.4 Contaminants of Concern - Mobilisation Pathways

The risk of contamination concentrations in the ground only pose a risk of harm to a sensitive receptor where a pathway for exposure exists between the source and receptor. There must be an instrument of travel creating this pathway, such instruments specific to 17&19 Schofields Rd include:

Instrument Contaminant Type

Leachability of contaminant Nil (although may not yet be identified)

Friability of contaminant Asbestos

Volatility of contaminant Nil (although may not yet be identified)

Following removal of all existing structures at the site the only media considered for contamination to be present in (excluding hazardous materials in building structures is:

Uncontrolled fill soils

Natural soils (only if identified to be contaminated)

Groundwater impacts (only if identified to be contaminated)


The contaminant then needs a method of transport or displacement within the environment. Such modes include release to:

Environment Method of mobility

Atmosphere Dust generation – there are significant areas of exposed earthy materials creating mobilisation potential

Ground (penetration) Loss of hazardous liquids into ground (ie. fuels from AST), infiltration

Plant and absorption Adsorption of metals into vegetation and phytoxic impacts (soils <2.0m below ground surface)

Liquid dispersion Surface water run-off

The potential contaminants identified in the available previous investigations are generally:

Contaminant Matrix Identified Contamination

Solid Foreign materials including potential asbestos discoveries

Liquid Nil identified

Vapour Nil identified

During the site investigation Geotest (2017) did not identify any potential groundwater impacts resulting from the identified contamination in soil at the site and groundwater considerations have not been included above. During remediation should groundwater impacts be identified please refer to Section 4.4.

3.5 Sensitive Receptors & Exposure Pathways

Finally, to create the risk of harm, the contaminant needs to be to be exposed to the vulnerable receptor. Based on the contaminants identified at the site we have prepared the table below identifying sensitive receptors and potential exposure pathways:

Sensitive Receptor(s) Future long-term residents, future users interacting with soils at the site (ie. gardening), excavation/ construction/ maintenance workers directly exposed, neighbouring occupants, flora species and vegetation at the site, down-gradient fresh-water ecosystems and endangered communities

Potential Pathway Potential Contamination

Inhalation Foreign materials including potential asbestos discoveries

Dermal TRH/BTEX (aesthetic only)

Consumption TRH/BTEX (aesthetic only)

Phytotoxic absorption Nil

Water movement through drainage networks TRH/BTEX (aesthetic only)

We have included a graphical example of a generic CSM for ease of interpretation. The site specific CSM to 17&19 Schofields Rd has been described in the text above. The graphic below is for general information only.


Source: NEPM 2013 (Schedule B7, page 15)

3.6 Previous Remediation Activities

Geotest is not aware of any previous environmental remediation activities that have occurred at the site since undertaking the Geotest (2017) investigation.


REMEDIATION CRITERIA

To assist with the strategies and quantify site suitability, the following assessment criteria have been adopted from the following published guidance documents as presented in the previous detailed site investigation report;

CRC CARE (2011), Health Screening Levels for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater, E Friebel and P. Nadebaum, Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC Care) Technical Report Series, no. 10.

National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) 1999, Schedule B (1) Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure (NEPM), ISBN 0 642 32312 7.

NEPC 2013, ‘National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 No. 1’ Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2013L00768.

NSW DEC 2006, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd edition)' ISBN 1 74137 859 1, Department of Environment and Conservation NSW.

NSW DECCW 2010 ‘Technical Note – Decommissioning, Abandonment & Removal of UPSS’, ISBN 978 1 74232 518 7.

NSW DECCW 2010 ‘Technical Note – Site Validation & Reporting UPSS’, ISBN 978 1 74232 193 6

NSW EPA 1995, 'Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines', ISBN 0 7310 3756 1.

NSW EPA 2014, ‘Waste Classification Guidelines Part 1’, ISBN 978 1 74359 798 9.

NSW OEH 2011, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites', ISBN 0 7310 3892 4, NSW Environment Protection Authority.

4.1 Adopted Site Investigation Levels (SILs) Human Health Criteria

Given the intended use of the site is residential land use we have adopted the following guidance and make comment on selection below:

The health-based investigation levels (HIL) for residential with accessible gardens and soil land uses Column A in Table 1A (1) NEPM 2013) have been adopted (HIL A).

The Health Screening Levels for TRH from NEPM (2013), Low Density Residential (sand) provided in Table 1A(3) have been adopted.

The Direct Worker Exposure Health Screening Levels for TRH from CRC Care (2011), Low Density Residential (sand) provided in Table B4 (for direct worker exposure only) have been adopted.

The Soil Asbestos Criteria for Asbestos in Soils, Western Australia Department of Health (DOH) 2009 Guidelines

The ecological investigation levels (EILs) (site derived) for urban setting (80% protection) NEPM 2013

The ecological screening levels (ESLs) for urban setting (80% protection) in Table 1B(6) NEPM 2013

We have presented the adopted site criteria in Table 1 which is attached to this report.

4.2 Aesthetic Criteria

Given the light semi-rural historical use of the site it is possible that fill materials containing inert, non-hazardous foreign materials are present. Although the site may be considered suitable for use from an environmental perspective, management of the aesthetic limits must still be considered. Whilst there are no specific numeric guidelines for assessing aesthetic suitability a balanced approach should be taken. In the case of this site is it proposed for residential (HIL-A) and as such we propose a higher expectation of soil quality is applied. General assessment of the soil aesthetic considerations must be made and should consider:


Chemically discoloured soils or large quantities of inert refuse, particularly unsightly, may cause ongoing concern to site users.

Highly malodorous soils (ie. strong hydrocarbon odour, hydrogen sulphide odours etc)

Large monolithic deposits (ie. non-hazardous ash deposits)

Presence of putrescible refuse (which may also pose a potential human health risk)

Soils containing residue from animal burial (which may also pose a biological human health risk)

Depth of materials, including chemical residues, in relation to the final surface of the site.

The need for and practicality of, any long term management of foreign material.

The presence of small quantities of non-hazardous inert material and low odour residue that will decrease

overtime. Additional caution must be exercised when assessing sensitive land uses.

4.3 Terrestrial Ecological Criteria

The NEPM 2013 provides a pragmatic and site specific approach for EILs, considering a range of different soil characteristics – opposed to a single type. EILs have been developed for selected metals and organic substances and are applicable for assessing risk to terrestrial ecosystems. These generally apply to soils within the top 2.0m of soil profile and depend on specific soil physicochemical properties, particularly in environmental sensitive areas such as riparian zones, wetlands or areas of state environmental significance. In highly arid regions, consideration of EILs to 3.0m below final ground levels should be given.

NEPM 2013 also described Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs), which generally apply to the top 2.0m of the future soil profile. The ESLs are specific to the intended land use and soil type; defined as coarse or fine grained.

In urban re-development settings, such as the site being investigated within this report, the use of specific EILs must be considered relevant to the proposed future civil activities and unknown future placement of soils (vertically within the fill profile). By nature of such civil re-development, significant vegetation will be cleared, topsoil will be stripped, stockpiled, homogenised and re-instated. Therefore, if an EIL exceedance above the site criteria exists, it should be segregated (hot-spot removal) prior to widespread stripping, quarantined and then placed at a depth >2.0m below the finished surface. This should be supervised and recorded by the environmental consultant. Validation sampling following hot-spot removal is also required. However, under the remediation hierarchy it is recommended that the actual treatment or remediation of identified EIL exceedances is the first method, with on-site containment being the least favoured, particularly in sensitive land applications or ecological setting.

4.3.1 Calculation of Site Specific Ecological Criteria

Currently there is no specific site derived information on the background ecological concentrations for the site or regional area. In the Detailed Site Investigation Geotest used our knowledge and experience of the surrounding geology to derive interim values to support the investigation. Therefore, to calculate the ambient background concentration (ABC) will require the use of specific data collected from within the site boundary. This should be collected in an area of natural residual soils, preferably up-gradient of any fill or commercial activities. The sample should be analysed for Chromium, copper, lead, nickel and zinc in order to derive the ABCs. For the EILs to be appropriately calculated the soils should also be analysed for their bio-physical properties including Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), pH and Organic Carbon Content (OCC).

Following establishment of site specific information, Geotest will use the ASC NEPM EIL Calculation Tool to derive site specific thresholds. The method for calculating site specific EILs for Nickel, Chromium Copper, Zinc and Lead (aged) can be found in the NEPM (2013) and is re-produced below:

EIL = Ambient Background Concentration + Added Contaminant Limit

Should an un-acceptable ecological risk be identified Geotest will consider further management steps which may include:

Site specific ecological risk assessment


Consideration for deep fill burial (ie. >2.0m from finished surface) of EIL unacceptable material

Amendment of the remediation goal or engineering devices to restrict opportunity for exposed soil to landscape areas.

In the absence of ambient background concentrations prior to remediation we have made assumptions on the background levels, based on typical Western Sydney residual Penrith soil group geological conditions. Thus we have presented GUIDANCE values until such time as further analytical testing can be undertaken to provide final site derived criteria concentrations.

The adopted GUIDANCE site EILs for Arsenic, DDT, Napthalene and ESLs for hydrocarbon compounds are shown in Table 1 (attached).

4.4 Groundwater

Based on the information presented for the site groundwater remediation is not expected to be required for the site. In the event that groundwater remediation is required the following guidance documents should be implemented:

ANZECC 2000 Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality

NSW DEC 2007 Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Groundwater Contamination

The CSM provided in Section 3 of this report should enable identification and determination for potential groundwater contamination and its management at the site.


REMEDIATION STRATEGY

The development of the site specific remediation strategy initially involves comparing the potential remediation options used to mitigate, remove and/ or manage any exposure from contamination at the Site.

The NSW DECC 2006 Auditor Scheme outlines the preferred remediation strategies for management of contamination, subject to the proposed site land use and the suitability of the various strategies’ implementation:

Hierarchy Method

1 Remediation of material on-site for beneficial re-use (includes on-site remediation practices)

2 Excavation of material and off-site disposal at a suitability licensed EPA waste facility

3 On-site containment and capping of contaminated materials

5.1 Strategy Analysis

The identified areas and presumed areas of contamination at the site are generally resultant from filling of land, surface disturbance. Varied remediation requirements have been identified for foreign materials (including surface debris). During remediation/ civil works the presence of further un-expected contamination cannot be precluded and should be monitored. The following is a more site specific detailed analysis of the strategies briefly summarised above:

Method 1

(foreign materials) Given the identified nature debris and foreign material soil contamination present at the site it is considered likely that on-site remediation practices may result in significant portions of soils being able for re-use on-site. This technique involves ‘emu-picking’ or screening the foreign material from the soil and appropriate off-site disposal of the recovered wastes. The outcome of on-site treatment for foreign materials will depend on the % concentration of debris in soil. On-site treatment should not be considered for grossly impacted materials. The removal of debris should be undertaken to the extent considered practical and suitable by the validating environmental consultant.

This technique also applies to potential asbestos identified in soils. For on-site treatment of asbestos in soils full scale implementation of the WA DOH 2009 procedures must be undertaken. Only a licensed contractor should be engaged to perform the treatment.

Method 2

(all contaminants) This method, although generally the most expensive of remediation strategies eliminates all future risk by physically removing the contamination from site.

The excavation and disposal (‘dig and dump’) strategy is also very time efficient. This method is generally cost and time effective for smaller volumes of contaminated materials. Given a low-moderate volume of un-suitable soil materials have been identified at the site during the investigations thus far, it is expected that this method may be financially feasible if time is a priority. However, it is worth noting that following successful implementation of Method 1, via on-site treatment the volume of waste destined for landfill can be reduced. We strongly recommend this method is adopted for areas of gross contamination (high % contaminant in soil matrix or pure waste products). This method is strongly recommended for any materials that are deemed un-suitable or impractical for on-site treatment (strategy 1).

It is important that following all remediation excavations and disposal, all excavations must be validated. It is also important that all legal waste disposal documentation is retained and checked for legitimacy by the supervising consultant. This may involve randomly following disposal vehicles to the licensed landfills.


Method 3

Due to the proposed widespread use of the land for residential and to achieve maximum residential site yield, it is not considered viable for relocation of and placement of contaminated material under roads or parkland areas.

Further, the volume of contaminated material identified in previous investigations will not likely warrant the economic benefit for containment on-site when considering the burden on land for future use. Further prohibiting this is the requirement for long-term site management and control, limiting land use options. Therefore, on-site containment of contaminated materials has not been considered for this site.

5.2 Preferred remedial strategy

The preferred remedial strategies for remediation of the un-suitable materials at the site is a hybrid combination of:

Method Description

1 On-site treatment and beneficial re-use of contaminated soils (subject to contamination concentrations and actual volumes)

2 Excavation and licensed off-site waste disposal; particularly for concentrated debris/ waste – following Method 1. Additionally, for any materials containing aesthetically un- levels of hydrocarbons.

Many considerations were made when determining this preferred strategy and they should be adhered to. They included:

Human health issues; dust suppression should be implemented during remediation works

Human health issues; required PPE should be worn when handling contaminated soil. This includes good personal hygiene and strong site management.

Ecological terrestrial ecosystems; appropriate consideration should be given to sensitive ecological communities when determining ecological investigation levels and screening levels.

Reliability; only experienced contractors should be engaged to remediate contaminated materials at the site.

Site remediation supervision and validation; all methods, whether treatment or disposal will require validation by experienced consultant prior to being considered suitable. This may include assessment by a suitably experienced occupational hygienist.

We recommend full time supervision during bulk excavation of un-suitable materials to ensure appropriate waste segregation – mitigating waste bulking – likely reducing the volume disposed and subsequent landfill tipping fees.

Lawful disposal – receipts for waste disposal must be retained by the waste contractor for inclusion in the validation report. The consultant should perform spot checks on trucks to ensure they are tipping at licensed facilities only.

Regulatory Approvals; Category 2 remediation work consent should be provided by Blacktown Council and they should be notified under the SEP55 planning instrument. Category 1 notification is not expected to be required.

Long term management; NOT REQUIRED as discussed in Section 5.1 the risk of harm is eliminated following the successful treatment/ remediation or off-site disposal.

Cost & Time; it is likely that the remediation activities will be required to happen swiftly to prevent further delay. Therefore, a cost/ time benefit analysis should be conducted to determine the most suitable method following excavation and realisation of the quantity. This can be driven by any key development milestones (ie. sub-division by EoFY).

Proficient identification and management of unexpected finds; should any material be identified that differs from the descriptions provided in earlier environmental reports be observed during the works, the council must be


notified and a suitably experienced environmental consultant should be engaged to direct the on-going works to ensure all risks are mitigated.


REMEDIATION WORKS

6.1 Remediation Extent

The extent of the known areas of remediation have been identified and are presented in Figure 3 and identified in Section 3.3 of this report. The following general comments are made regarding the available historical information at the site:

Groundwater has not been assessed. There is no indication based on previous investigations to suggest contamination of groundwater at the site has occurred. Refer to Section 4.4 for groundwater reference criteria

There is inherent uncertainty in remediation works, based on the likely uncertainties associated with uncontrolled fill deposits and soil remediation works of this nature the areas described and estimated volumes presented should not be relied upon. In the event of a significant volume variance the contractor and consultant should seek to implement the most effective remedial solution for the client.

Following demolition and prior to civil earthworks commencing Geotest recommend appropriate validation of all demolished building footprints to prevent cross contamination (from contractors or existing conditions);

Further investigation in areas where data gaps have been identified is required in the early phase of works. This is to assess land use suitability for both human health and ecological risk;

Remediation also includes general removal and lawful disposal of general debris, rubbish or waste at the site

The table extracted from Section 3.3 has been re-presented below:

Site ID RAP Remediation Area

Investigation Locations

Contaminant of Potential Concern, Matrix & Future Action

Approx. depth of remediation (m bgl)

Approx. area of remediation (m2)

(a) Area 1 Former farm dam

Potential asbestos, metals impacts and OCP impacts from former market garden uses

Unknown (0.5m)

1,000

(b) Area 2 Central area of site on driveway

Asbestos materials present on surface and potentially extending into sub-soils, requiring further assessment/ management

Unknown (0.3m in fill only)

250

(b) Area 3 Under existing

house and shed

structures

COPC; TRH / BTEX, metals. Requires removal and further assessment/ management

Unknown (0.5m)

1,000

6.2 Site Specific Geology

Geotest (2017) has not made an assessment of sub-surface geological conditions at the site. An experienced environmental consultant should supervise all excavations to determine the material’s future land use aesthetic suitability, whilst also ensuring effective segregation, minimisation of waste and enable preparation of the validation report.


6.3 Remediation Preliminaries

Geotest considers the remediation works to be Category 2 remediation works. Geotest is not aware of any:

Threatened species at the site

Part 3A planning approvals at the site

Significant impact on ecological communities or populations

In an area within a planning instrument as being of significant environmental significance

Subject to approval under another SEPP or regional environmental plan

No council specific requirements for SEPP 55 Category 1 notification (within Blacktown Council policy)

In accordance with the State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 (SEPP55) – Remediation of Land, written notification of remediation should be lodged to the local council authority 30 priors to remediation commencing on-site. The council may wish to seek copies of the previous investigation reports. This RAP should be provided to council. This RAP should be amended to include the details of the on-site environmental remediation contractor at least 7-14 days prior to commencing on-site, further:

Any further investigation activities should be included as an addendum to this RAP report.

Validation and monitoring activities should be undertaken as described in Section 7 of this report.

The proposed areas requiring remediation are presented in Figure 3 which has been attached to this report.

6.4 Site Setup

The remediation work-site should be setup in accordance with the required NSW SafeWork Codes of Practices and Guidelines. Further, the following work controls are recommended due to the nature of remediation works expected:

Services location should be undertaken prior to any ground penetrating excavation at the site.

The proposed remediation areas should be marked out and clearly delineated prior to site re-development works commencing. These areas should be communicated to all contractors during pre-work briefings.

An appropriate stockpiling and soils treatment area shall be established.

The required site amenities will be installed and functioning for all workers prior to works.

The required environmental controls will be installed prior to works.

Bulk civil works at the site (including topsoil stripping) should not occur until the remediation excavations have been completed and appropriately validated by the environmental consultant.

6.5 Workplace Health, Safety and the Environment

Prior to remediation commencing during site setup any required environmental and safety controls should be installed. These are recommended / expected to include (but are not limited to):

Secure perimeter fencing around the site/ work areas;

Shade-cloth to be erected on perimeter fencing;

Barricades / bunting to be installed around all open excavations;

Silt fencing / environmental controls for protection of waterways (in accordance with ‘The Blue Book’ LandCom 2004).

Required contractor emergency details and site signage;

During all HAZMAT removal works, occupational hygienist air monitoring for the presence of air-borne asbestos fibres is considered best practice (COP 2012) and an appropriate decontamination unit should be setup to ensure safe, hygienic work practices; and

General site dust suppression techniques are in use.


6.6 Remediation Activities & Excavation

In summary, the remediation activities of known contamination areas will involve the following activities (but may not be limited to):

Excavation, segregation of the various waste streams and safe stockpiling for classification and determination of future re-use/ off-site disposal. Trucking and transport of wastes to landfill.

Consultant services including inspection, monitoring, clearance, sampling and validation

Asbestos treatment and removal activities.

During the remediation activities the following should also be adhered to:

Dust suppression should be available on-site at all times during works.

All waste documentation and tracking should be kept on record for inclusion in the validation report (Section 8).

6.7 Excavation, Segregation & Stockpiling

An experienced environmental consultant should supervise the remedial excavation works. It is preferable that the same consultant representative is present during all remedial excavations to ensure consistency with the soil segregation. The soils containing elevated concentrations (%) of foreign materials should be segregated based on their applicability for re-use without treatment. A potential on-site tracking protocol is provided below:

Soil Type

Segregation Description Proposed Action

1 GREEN Materials do not require any further treatment and are considered suitable for future use as general fill

2 AMBER Materials are not suitable and treatment is required, materials should be appropriately stockpiled

3 RED Materials contain high levels (grossly contaminated) of foreign materials, are not considered practical for treatment and should be disposed to landfill as per their relevant waste classification (TBA).

For all material that is excavated to stockpile the following procedures should be implemented as part of best practice:

Any chemically contaminated material should be placed atop and covered with plastic or similar to prevent dust generation and run-off during precipitation; or. Where possible material should be placed on hard-stand and appropriately bunded to prevent run-off.

Material should be stockpiled clear of any drains or water-courses

Suitable sediment and erosion control measures should be implemented around stockpiles.

Any stockpiles of contaminated material should not exceed the perimeter height of the surrounding fence lined with shade cloth.

Heavily contaminated materials should not be placed on bare earth without plastic beneath the pile.

6.8 ACM remediation & physical waste removal for potential beneficial re-use

In the event that asbestos is identified within fill soils at the site the following should be implemented and works undertaken by an experienced, licensed contractor. We consider that soil with asbestos or other foreign material contamination may be suitable for re-use following suitable remediation treatment and validation. This method will only be possible where it is practically feasible, ie. If materials are heavily contaminated (high %) then it is probable this will not be feasible.

Geotest have provided a chronological summary of broad steps for ACM remediation below:


Excavate to stockpile contaminated materials as per Section 6.7. During this process wastes should be appropriately segregated based on their expected suitability for re-use as given above. Any surface fragments identified during the excavation process should be immediately removed for disposal.

Setup a ‘treatment area’ which will be appropriately bunted off, sign-posted and access restricted (as per Section 6.4)

In the treatment area, spread contaminated soil out into smaller piles – 15m x 15m x 0.1m high (per spread pile)

Appropriately licensed (AS-A or AS-B) contractors will manually hen pick the material to remove ACM and general rubbish/ waste. This should be undertaken by way of a traverse with a 90° direction change on each pass. At least two - three passes should be conducted and a manual hand rake should be used. The rake teeth should preferably be <7mm spaced and at least 100mm long. Realising the silty/ clayey nature of local soil strata, mechanical means may be required to aid in the soil screening process.

Following the inspection process, the spread soil will then be ‘raked or flipped’ to expose another surface, the picking process described above shall be repeated. This process is to be repeated until no more ACM or can be visually observed in the materials. Where possible care should be exercised to minimise the damage of potential ACM within soils.

ACM pieces to be bagged immediately and retained for the consultant to gravimetrically weigh and record.

Following weighing by the consultant, all ACM waste should be lawfully disposed of by the contractor and waste receipts provided for inclusion in report.

The typical asbestos content of compressed fibre cement board is 12% - 18%. The adopted calculation factor should be given in the validation report.

General waste will be segregated for future off-site disposal.

The process should be supervised by an experienced environmental consultant who will provide visual clearance following picking. The consultant will also collect an asbestos characterisation sample from each treatment stockpile (~15m3) for interpretation and analysis.

For friable removal activities a licensed asbestos assessor (LAA) will also be required to provide a visual clearance report as per the SafeWork NSW COP (2012) and Guidance Note (2014).

The required samples are described below:

The sample collected should be as described in WA DOH 2009 and consist of a 10L bulk sample which is sieved through a 7mm sieve, over a contracting colour fabric or plastic for identification of ACM (>7mm) and visual identification of any significant AF/FA (<7mm that passed the sieve).

All collected ACM fragments should be retained for weighing by the consultant

Additionally, a 500mL sample should be collected which will be submitted for laboratory analysis, a 500mL sample should be collected from each stockpile.

Further detail on the stockpile sampling methodology can be found within Section 4.1.6 of the WAH DOH (2009) guidance document.

The spread out material can then be heaped up, given an ID, labelled and placed in a quarantine area until laboratory results are available to confirm its suitability for re-use.

This process continues for all contaminated material.

Any material that is identified to contain residual ACM asbestos fragment contamination (>7mm) above that of the site criteria should be either treated again (as described above) or if determined of no further benefit it should be disposed of to an EPA asbestos licensed landfill facility.

Any material that is identified to contain residual AF/FA asbestos contamination (7mm) above that of the site criteria should be disposed of to an EPA asbestos licensed landfill facility.


All material proposed for re-use (following successful treatment as above) requires on-site material tracking documentation to be conducted. This should involve the environmental consultant supervising its relocation to the future zone for placement. A volumetric survey is may be conducted of the material ex-situ and spatial survey of its in-situ location is preferred following placement. This will then form part of the validation report.

During placement (re-instatement) of the successfully treated soils, a further inspection and emu-picking event should be undertaken of the final exposed surface up to 100mm below finished ground level (upon completion). Any further ACM fragments identified at this time should be removed by the removalist and retained by the consultant for weighing and the process described above.

Very few fragments should be identified at the placement stage assuming the remediation treatment methods preceding the reinstatement have been conducted in adequately.

We recommend successfully treated ACM material is re-instated ‘at depth’ within the fill profile.

Following placement of treated ACM material, we recommend; where achievable, at least 1.0m of non-contaminated suitable fill is placed atop the treated material.

All stockpile information, ACM observations and inspections, sampling data, photographs, any quantification (if undertaken), materials tracking, drawings or survey and waste receipts should be retained for inclusion in the site validation report.

Any additional foreign materials should be removed by physical screening means, whether by excavator or manual labour.

All materials should be appropriately sampled and validated by the environmental consultant prior to being considered suitable for re-use.

6.9 Validation Sampling Remediated Soils (excluding asbestos)

Following successful on-site remediation stockpile validation sampling should be undertaken. We recommend a conservative sampling approach. As the material is assumed to have been homogenised during the mixing process prior to bio-remediation occurring we have adopted the similar to that listed in the NEPM (2013) for stockpile characterisation. The table below (Table 4, Section 7.5.2, Schedule B2) provides minimum number of bio-remediation stockpile validation samples for piles up to 200m3:

Stockpile Volume (m3 Recommended min. number of stockpile samples

<75 3

75 - <100 4

100 - <125 5

125 - <150 6

150 - <175 7

<175 - 200 8

It is not expected that bio-remediation piles will be any larger than 200m3 and thus the frequencies in the table above are considered acceptable.

The stockpile samples should also be collected from varying depths excavated >0.3m from the surface of the stockpile. This will ensure representative characterisation of the treated material. This will require the use of an excavator, hand or mechanical auger or hand dug pit to penetrate to the centre of the pile.

6.10 Validation of Excavations

All excavations where contaminated soil was excavated from should be appropriately validated to ensure the remediation goals are achieved. Section 7 of this report outlines validation requirements for this site.


6.11 Burial of Select Materials at Depth

Geotest understands as part of the civil re-development of the site there will be areas of deep fill to raise existing reduced levels (RLs) to final subdivision levels for both road, open space and residential areas. As recommended in Section 4.3, in the event of the identification of significant materials that pose a risk to terrestrial ecological communities, burial >2.0m below finished surface may be considered. These materials would need to be appropriately tracked during the civil re-development. The remediation contractor should liaise with the civil surveyor regarding the ability to place materials at depth. Other considerations including geotechnical suitability of the material will need to be considered prior to placement.

This methodology has also been presented in Section 6.8 following the successful treatment of ACM contaminated soils. Deep burial of materials exceeding health screening levels (HSL) is not permitted without further management to prevent vapour intrusion.

6.12 Off-site transport and disposal

Geotest is not aware of a waste classification that has been prepared for the site. Prior to off-site disposal this should be prepared. Geotest recommends use of available data in Geotest (2017) when preparing waste classifications.

Additionally, Geotest makes the following comments regarding off-site disposal:

All material leaving the site should be appropriately classified in accordance with the NSW EPA 2014 Waste Guidelines.

All material transported off-site should be recorded by the contractor for materials tracking completeness. Tracking will be required for validation reporting purposes.

Any trackable wastes/ contaminated spoil should be disposed using only licensed transport (NSW EPA).

All contaminated material should be transported in sealed truck bodies/ skip bins.

All trucks exiting the site should be decontaminated to ensure any spillages during loading are removed from the body and also removed from the tyres.

Any landfill weighbridge dockets should be kept and provided upon completion of the removal works. These are to be included as part of the site validation report. Materials should only be disposed to those facilities licensed to accept the waste. The contractor should seek written approval from the nominated facility prior to transport. Written approval should be provided to the consultant for inclusion in the validation report.

6.13 Site Re-instatement

If material is required to be imported from an off-site location only Virgin Excavated Natural Material (VENM) shall be imported. A certificate prepared by an environmental consultant shall accompany any material brought to site and be kept for inclusion in the site validation report. This certificate should be prepared in accordance with the NSW EPA 2014 Waste Guidelines. Refer to Section 7.2 of this report for further details on imported materials.

The imported material should also satisfy the future site land use requirements for the development. A VENM certificate without or with inadequate analytical testing that does not conclude its suitability for use at 17 & 19 Schofields Rd will not be accepted.


DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQOS) & ENVIRONMENTAL SITE VALIDATION

7.1 Validation Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)

After the remediation activities are completed a validation report for the site shall be prepared by a suitably experienced environmental consultant. The report must be prepared within the regulatory framework relevant to the stage of the remediation process. The report should also be prepared in general accordance with the NSW OEH 2011 Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites.

The purpose of the validation report is to verify the effectiveness of the remediation and ensure that the resultant condition of the site is suitable for the proposed future land use.

A Data Quality Objective (DQO) process is provided in Appendix IV of the NSW EPA 2006 Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme. The purpose of the DQO process is to define the type, quantity and quality of the data required to support environmental decisions relating to the condition or future condition of a site. The DQOs follow a seven-step process, systematically defining the scope of both the investigation and validation program. Details of the proposed process to be implemented at the 17 & 19 Schofields Road site are given in the following sections.

7.1.1 Step 1: State the Problem

The objective of the validation works at the site is to ensure both the known and unknown remediation areas are both chemically and aesthetically validated for suitable residential land-use. The areas of uncertainty should also be suitably investigated and remediated as part of this process and incorporated into the final validation report. The site specific conceptual site model (CSM) relevant to addressing contamination matters at 17&19 Schofields Road is provided in Section 3 of this report. The primary contamination drivers identified at the site are:

Non-hazardous, inert foreign materials within uncontrolled fill posing an aesthetic risk

Potential for asbestos contamination (although not identified) within fill posing a human health risk

The site validation should be compared with the proposed land use (Standard Residential with access to soil). The site assessment thresholds for this land use. These are provided in Section 4.1 of this report and are:

The health-based investigation levels (HIL) for residential with accessible gardens and soil land uses Column A in Table 1A (1) NEPM 2013 have been adopted (HIL A).

The Health Screening Levels for TRH from NEPM (2013), Low Density Residential (sand) provided in Table 1A(3) have been adopted.

The Health Screening Levels for direct worker exposure to TRH from CRC (2011), Low Density Residential (sand) provided in Table B4 have been adopted.

The Soil Asbestos Criteria for Asbestos in Soils, Western Australia Department of Health (DOH) 2009 Guidelines

The ecological investigation levels (EILs) (site derived) for urban setting (80% protection) NEPM 2013

The ecological screening levels (ESLs) for urban setting (80% protection) in Table 1B(6) NEPM 2013

7.1.2 Step 2: Identify the Decisions

The CSM model in Section 3 of this report presents the contamination drivers based on the existing information available for the site. Due to the inherent unknowns associated with remediation however this CSM should be continually re-visited to ensure its relevance to the contamination conditions at the site. The validation program should consider the CSM when determining a suitable validation strategy. The validation plan and final design (Step 7 Section 7.1.7) should consider whether the remediation process has adequately address all contamination matters at the site mitigating un-acceptable exposure to human health and terrestrial ecosystems.

7.1.3 Step 3: Identify the Inputs to Decision

The primary input in determining the success of the validation strategy is the comprehensive adoption and comparison of the adopted site land use criteria. The adopted criteria have been presented above in Section 7.1.1. The criteria will


be used to measure and make determination on whether the environmental variables specific to the 17&19 Schofields Road site are suitable for the proposed land use or require remediation. Additional inputs which may support the ongoing suitability also include the future layout of the sub-division. For example, should any fill material containing non-hazardous inert material be proposed for retention and burial, knowledge of the spatial location of proposed local roads may enable burial for long-term encapsulation. This will ensure that fill materials considered un-suitable for sensitive land uses are appropriately located for the long term. A decision such as on-site burial may also require input form the local consent authority (ie. local council). Refer to Section 6.12 for further details on burial of select material at depth.

Additional regulators may also stipulate inputs to satisfy the safety and workplace health and safety during the remediation works. An example of an additional input required for remediation success is the requirement for a Licensed Asbestos Assessor (LAA) to provide a clearance certificate following friable (AF/FA) asbestos removal. Consideration to the relevant SafeWork NSW Code of Practice should be given in this instance.

Site specific conditions identified during the remediation such as soil type and groundwater interaction may also determine the relevant inputs for decision making to achieve validation.

7.1.4 Step 4: Define the Study Boundaries

The spatial boundary of the site is limited to the registered lots as provided in Section 1 of this report; commonly referred to as 17&19 Schofields Road Schofields. The vertical boundary limits of the validation are considered to be that of achieving a suitable environmental outcome for the site, allowing future beneficial land-use. If the remediation objectives cannot be satisfied (ie. in the event of deep groundwater contamination) suitable long-term management practices will be put in place. In the absence of any groundwater contamination, the practical vertical boundaries proposed are:

Vertically 0.5m into natural residual materials

To the full vertical extent of fill

>3.0m below base of any building where contaminated fill materials are to be retained on-site

>2.0m from surface for materials posing a risk to terrestrial ecological receptors (EIL)

7.1.5 Step 5: Develop a Decision Rule

The project decision rules must consider whether the remediation outcomes are considered appropriate for the validation decision. Therefore, to ensure appropriate validation the following questions should be satisfied:

Question Suggested Practices

Have the CoPC been addressed? Have the remediation areas been appropriately sampled?

Understanding of CoPC, sufficient sampling frequencies in accordance with industry practice, effective grid or targeted sampling approach, standard field methods

Have appropriate field techniques been utilised? Field and wash blanks, equipment rinsate, disposable sampling consumables, adequate site records, photographic evidence, competent – consistent person. Successful communication with contractor(s)

Have the samples been appropriately handled? Laboratory supplied storage, correct preservation and storage, CoC conditions, satisfied sample holding times

Has sufficient QAQC been conducted? In field blind duplicates, NATA analytical laboratories, assessment of laboratory QAQC information, reliability and accuracy assessment

Should the remediation satisfy these conditions the decision may permit the intended future land use and successful validation would be achieved. Should the results of the validation data fail to meet the criteria, should a significant absence of information in remediation validation be identified then the contamination may require further investigation and management in order to achieve validation.


7.1.6 Step 6: Specify Limits on Decision Errors

During the data interpretation, variance to the specified industry accepted limits may arise. For example, this may be in the form of duplicate information exceeding the adopted 50% relative percentage difference (RPD) threshold or an inadequate laboratory QAQC surrogate recovery. These standards are provided in NEPM (2013) and should be considered by the validating consultant, they have not been re-produced in this report.

The key themes during interpretation of the decision rule to base judgement of whether a valid error has occurred are:

Quality Theme Relevant Decision Error Rule Indicator

Completeness All critical contamination areas addressed, samples collected and appropriately analysed, experienced personnel with adequate documentation

Comparability Same methods used for sample collection during works, consistent consultant/ sampler, consistent sample volumes

Representativeness Field and laboratory accuracy, in accordance with CSM and site sampling plans, type of sample media suitable for the data interpretation

Precision Accurate methods followed, duplicate and triplicate information received, appropriate QAQC including additional controls (ie. spike/blank) for selected CoPCs

Accuracy

Un-biased sampling, relevant or required accreditation, industry recognition and qualification

7.1.7 Step 7: Optimise the Design for Obtaining Data

The following is a guide which should be implemented during the validation sampling program at 17&19 Schofields Road. Where it is determined acceptable frequencies and sampling densities may be altered at the direction of the experienced environmental consultant undertaking the validation. This would only be in response to an inconsistent condition that was un-expectedly encountered, or where it is not practical to comply with the recommended protocol.

The validation program should consist of:

Validation chemical samples collected both vertically and horizontally across all remedial excavations. Both excavation walls and floor should be validated. The following are industry accepted frequencies:

1 sample per <10 lineal metres of excavation wall.

1 sample per <25m2 of excavation floor area.

These frequencies may be decreased for large excavations at the discretion of the consultant

Excavation wall samples are vertically collected at <1.0m intervals or at any changes in soil type (ie fill/ residual). The validation wall samples should target the same depth / and or material type as the original sample location.

The samples should be analysed for all the targeted contaminants of potential concern.

Visual clearance for the removal of asbestos in accordance with NSW SafeWork practices should also be conducted during works.

Duplicate and triplicate samples along with field and laboratory QAQC should be adhered to. This may include:

Intra-laboratory blind field duplicate samples at 1:10 samples (10%) (conservative measure)

Inter-laboratory blind field duplicate samples at 1:20 samples (5%)

Field wash and equipment rinsate blanks dependent on the field sampling methods used

Solid/ liquid trip spike/ trip blanks for any volatile analysis (ie. TRH/ BTEX)

All other relevant provisions within the NEPM 2013 should be adhered to during validation works.


7.2 Imported Materials Validation

All imported fill materials should be assessed for their suitability for use at the Site. Only VENM should be imported. Material shall only be considered suitable for use on-site if the following criteria (minimum) are satisfied:

The material should be defined as VEMN based on NSW EPA 2014. The assessment should be undertaken in accordance with the NSW EPA 2014 Guidelines.

The material source site should be assessed by an experienced consultant for suitability.

The concentrations of metals are within the accepted background concentrations.

The other selected analytes (ie. TPH, BTEX, PAH, OCP, asbestos) are all less than the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR).

The composition, type and colour of the material should be generally consistent with the local geology.

Imported material should be assessed for its aesthetic suitability to the site.

Imported material should not affect the surrounding ecosystem or sensitive environmental receptors.

The supervising environmental consultant should perform routine inspections of the VENM upon arrival to site. The consultant should inspect the material to ensure it is consistent with the material characteristic/ descriptions provided in its respective source VENM report. Should any unexpected find, uncharacteristic material or visible/ olfactory contamination be observed in the VENM the load should be rejected from import to site.

We recommend the supervising consultant consider use of a ‘Fill Import, Load Inspection Proforma’ which can be completed during the import works to verify each load of imported material.

7.3 Validation Report

The validation plan should be prepared by an experienced consultant. The report should be prepared in general accordance with the NSW OEH 2011 Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites. The report should comprehensively address:

Historical investigations undertaken at the site

Detail the remediation works undertaken at the site

Present field and laboratory information satisfying the DQOs and objectives of the RAP

Demonstrate that the remediation outcomes have been achieved

Include all waste tracking and disposal information, both for all exported wastes and all imported products

Detail any unexpected finds or pollution incidents which may have occurred during the works

Outline any variance from the remedial strategy and discuss how this was appropriately implemented with consideration given to the CSM

Outline any long-term environmental management or monitoring requirements for the site

Include any other information relevant to the contamination status of the site

Provide a statement regarding the future suitability of land for its intended use from a contamination perspective.


UNEXPECTED FINDS PROTOCOL

Whilst undertaking remediation and civil works, should any site specific geologically-uncharacteristic material be observed that was not identified during earlier site investigations the following precautions and actions should be implemented:

1. Works in the vicinity of the material are to cease immediately

2. The area is to be sign posted and cordoned off from other site workers

3. Advise the local government authority (council) of the discovery – to the assigned principal compliance officer (PCA).

4. Engage a suitably qualified consultant to attend site to assess the materials

5. Photographic records should be collected

6. Do not disturb any suspected contaminated material until further observation and determination of the material (should it be hazardous) has been be undertaken by an experienced consultant.

7. PPE should be used (if required).

8. Environmental Sampling, removal, off-site disposal and validation

9. The engaged EPA accredited environmental site auditor should be kept informed of un-expected occurrences and consulted with if required.

Uncharacteristic soil may be characterised as:

Include former rifle range equipment, consumables, pellets, bullet housings, skeet targets etc.

Distinctively different to other soils on-site

Appear to be concentrated to a localised area (ie. burial pits)

Stained, oil soaked or containing a petroleum sheen. Includes other products such as batteries etc

May contain offensive odours, including sulphur based leachate impacts or sewerage

Buried building products and debris/ waste or other anthropogenic materials

May contain potential asbestos containing materials

May contain buried animal carcasses or evidence of decomposition


CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CEMP)

Note* All recommendations given in the following sections are considered supplementary to the future development consent conditions provided by Blacktown Council

9.1 Principal Contractor Responsibilities

The principal contractor will be responsible for preparing and implementing the CEMP during the works.

The principal contractor is responsible for site management, site security, make safe and overall responsibility whilst in their control. The prepared site specific WHS plan should be communicated to the workers prior to commencing works. Workers should be aware of their own personal responsibility (duty of care) and commitment to the safety and protection of the environment whilst on-site.

9.2 Hours of Site Operation

The assumed hours of work on-site shall only occur between the hours of:

Day Permitted hours of work

Monday - Friday 7:00am – 6:00pm

Saturday 8:00am – 1:00pm

Sunday and public holidays No Work

9.3 Site Amenities

The principal contractor shall ensure the required site amenities are in place at all times during remediation works on-site. The amenities shall comfortably accommodate the number of workers at the site at a given time. The amenities should be in general accordance with the SafeWork NSW Managing the Work Environment & Facilities Code of Practice December 2011.

9.4 EMP Preparation; Soil, Erosion, Sediment, Waste, Water, Runoff & Litter Management Plans

Generally, an approved EMP should be prepared for implementation during site works. The requirements of the EMP may include the following measures (but are not limited to):

Measures to control noise emissions

Measures to suppress odours and dust emissions

Selection of traffic routes to minimise residential noise intrusions

Soil and sediment controls to prevent erosion/ run-off

Measures to identify hazardous and industrial wastes and procedures for removal including asbestos

Community consultation

Further:

The development shall not result in increased sediment deposition to water bodies, wetlands, bushlands or environmentally significant lands.

All disturbed areas shall be progressively stabilised and re-vegetated so no area remains exposed for extended periods.

Sediment and erosion measures should be maintained until establishment of ground cover.


Vehicular access shall be controlled through installation of wash bays or shaker ramps to prevent tracking of sediment or dirt onto adjoining roadways. Wet washing of roadways to remove sediment is not permitted – another means must be implemented.

All topsoil, aggregate, sand or spoil shall be stored clear of drainage lines, easements, water bodies, stormwater drains, footpaths, kerbs, roads and there shall be measures in place with the approved sediment and erosion control plan.

The remediation works shall comply with the NSW EPA Interim Construction Noise Guideline for the control of noise from construction sites. No works shall occur outside the allowed hours as specified in Section 9.2. It is preferable all noisy activities are focused in the mid-morning or mid-afternoon when most neighbours may not be at home.

Any litter and refuse on-site should be immediately collected and placed in bins with plastic liners for disposal off-site in the general waste bins. Any outdoor bins should have secured lids to prevent birdlife picking items and dispersing rubbish across site.

Good civil work practises and overall housekeeping should be maintained on-site, potential run-off from excavations and stockpiles should be appropriately protected using control measures such as hay bales and silt fencing.

The project design and environmental protection measures should also consider the requirements specified in Landcom 2004 ‘The Blue Book Managing Urban Stormwater’.

9.5 Proposed temporary construction infrastructure

Geotest is not aware of any required stormwater or other temporary infrastructure required at the site during civil re-development work.

9.6 Traffic Control and Management Plans

Generally, a Construction Traffic Management Plan is required for development works. The plan should detail:

Vehicle route

Number of trucks

Hours of operation

Access arrangements

Traffic control

The plan is to be submitted to council for approval and in some cases the RMS. The plans should be prepared in accordance with the NSW RMS Traffic Control at Work Sites V4.

9.7 Dust and Odour Management

Given the sensitive location and general nature of remediation it is crucial adequate dust control measures are implemented during the remediation works. Dust shall be managed using techniques that may include (but not be limited to):

Utilising a water cart to control dust on all exposed areas of site.

Wetting down material prior to loading or handling

Covering, grassing or stabilising exposed earth stockpiles that will be left for an extended period of time

It is overall good practice to prevent the generation of any nuisance dust during the works. Due to the nature of the contaminants and site conditions, odour is unlikely to be an issue at the site.


9.8 Community Liaison and Complaints

As part of WHS site management requirements, the emergency contact details of the principal contractor’s representative shall be displayed on the site fencing / entrance to site. This should be in accordance with the NSW SafeWork Construction Work Code of Practice July 2014.

No community consultation requirements have been specified, however it is best practice to ensure a notification time period for neighbouring residents ‘notification to commence works on-site’.

The principal should also ensure any environmental complaints are handled accordingly and responded to within a suitable timeframe and to NSW EPA regulatory requirements for reporting. Large fines and prosecution may occur if the principal fails to notify the EPA within the required periods of any pollution events.


REGULATORY APPROVALS

10.1 SEPP 55 Remediation of Land

Geotest understands the works are classified as Category 2 remediation works, refer to Section 7.4 for the step by step process. Under Cat.2 works formal consent is not required by the state planning authority however the local council should be notified at least 14 - 30 days prior to works commencing on-site.

10.2 Protection of the Environment Act (POEO) 1997

All materials transported off-site must be accompanied by a waste classification letter prepared in accordance with NSW EPA 2014 Waste Classification Guidelines Part 1 Classifying Waste.

Any materials transported off-site classified as hazardous or restricted waste (waste code N120) must be tracked using the online NSW EPA waste consignment online tracking system and assigned a load number. This class of material must also be transported by a Category. 1 licensed contractor.

(http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/asmslightprofileapp/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fasmslightprofileapp%2fdefault.aspx)

Any Special Waste – Asbestos materials (including asbestos in soils) transported off-site must be tracked under the NSW EPA ‘Waste Locate’ system. The requirement was legislated from 1 July 2015 under the Waste Regulation 2014 within the POEO Act 1997. The tracking system is live and all asbestos waste (excluding asbestos in soils) should be tracked via the system. Asbestos contaminated soils were exempted from the tracking system in late 2015. The exemption has been extended until February 2017.

(https://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/wasteregulation/wastelocate-asbestos.htm)

The materials must be received by an appropriately licensed facility with a source transport landfill receipt movement record available. This is tracked via a smart phone application with the transporter.

Within the POEO framework the Water Management Act 2000 provides the regulatory framework and approvals process for sensitive water design and trade waste release agreements etc. The ANZECC 2000 guidelines provide the physical and chemical characteristics and the receiving water body potential environmental receptors, risk of harm information and type. If water discharge to local stormwater is required from site it should comply with the ANZECC 2000 requirements for receiving waters. If discharge to the Sydney Water Corporation (SWC) sewer network is the preferred option then an Application for connection to discharge trade wastewater must be made to SWC. Information on the trade waste approval (TWA) process can be found here:

https://www.sydneywater.com.au/SW/your-business/managing-trade-wastewater/industrial-trade-wastewater/index.htm

10.3 Site Audit Statement (SAS)

The site is not expected to be subject to an audit statement by an EPA accredited auditor.


WORKPLACE HEALTH AND SAFETY (WHS)

A site specific workplace health and safety (WHS / OHS) plan should be developed by the contractor for implementation at the site. The plan should be prepared in accordance with the Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011.

As detailed in Section 9.1 the principal will be responsible for conducting site inductions and ensuring the safety of all workers on-site. The principal should also advise of their duty of care and responsibilities when on-site. The plan should include the following (but not be limited to):

Site introduction, principal contractor roles and responsibilities, policies, consultation and adherence

Site specific rules (to be adhered to at all times)

Site emergency protocol including site muster point, evacuation and roll call

Management of high risk construction work

Also consider site hazards and how they are reported, broadly they may include:

Mobile plant and equipment including road trucks

Contaminant management

Deep excavations

Nuisance dust

Underground services

Slips/ Trips and Falls on uneven ground

Site access and familiarity

Pollution and spills

Provision of safety data sheets (SDS) on-site for all substances.

Manual handing procedures and clear communication of techniques.

Environmental requirements and site management practices

Communication of the unexpected finds procedure and handling of contaminated materials at the site.

Implementation of task specific safe work method statements (SWMS)

Equipment checks; including pre-delivery checks, service records, risk assessments and daily pre-starts

All staff must attend the required site inductions, consultation and acknowledge through signing that they understand and will adhere to the covered topics, ensuring works can be undertaken safely.


SITE CONTACT DETAILS

The table below provides the site contact details to be updated during the remediation activities on-site:

Company Contact Phone AH Phone

Site Principal Contractor

(name)_________________

TBA

Consultant

(name)_________________

TBA

Consultant

(name)_________________

TBA

Registered Surveyor

(name)________________

TBA

Superintendent

(name)________________

TBA

Client

(name)________________

TBA

Blacktown Council 9839 6000

Principal Certifying Authority

TBA

Blacktown Hospital 9881 8000 or 000

DECCW / EPA 131 555

Endeavour Energy 131 003

Sydney Water 13 20 90

Jemena 131 909

Western Sydney RID Squad (illegal dumping)

02 4732 7446

WIRES Animal Rescue 1300 094 737

Environmental Consultant TBA

Site Ecologist TBA

<Insert>

<Insert>

(It is expected this page or similar will be displayed on-site or reproduced by the remediation contractor)


CONCLUSIONS

This RAP provides the recommended controls and framework for undertaking remediation activities at the site. These aim to render it suitable for future residential land-use. Through successful implementation of the strategies outlined within this report the site should be suitable for its intended land use.

Geotest makes the following comments and closing remarks relating to the information within the RAP for the proposed development of 17&19 Schofields Rd ID (a), (b) Schofields:

All remediation works should be conducted by an experienced contractor whom holds the required licenses to safely complete the works

All demolition and HAZMAT works should be undertaken by a suitably licensed and competent DE-2 and AS-B (or AS-A) contractor

All stockpiled debris, junk and waste should be safely removed and lawfully disposed.

Known visual remediation has been detailed in this report. All areas of known contamination should be appropriately validated by an experienced consultant.

The potential for contamination and unsuitable soils in other areas of the site is considered possible. During stripping and excavation an environmental consultation should supervise the removal of all un-controlled fill materials.

Remediation activities are likely to include:

Excavation and stockpiling of identified contaminated soils

Excavation and loading of un-treatable soils including materials with high or gross % contaminant in soils

Remediation sampling and validation if applicable or immediate load off-site

Re-instatement of the remediation excavation with site re-use materials (cut to fill) or suitable imported VENM.

Further comments:

The RAP has presented an overview of the requirements to be considered by the principal and included in their site specific CEMP which will be implemented, maintained and will be audited by Blacktown Council, NSW SafeWork or other regulatory authority throughout the works.

The RAP has provided guidance on the validation requirements required by OEH 2011 which will ensure the site will be adequately remediated and considered suitable for future residential land-use.

This RAP has been prepared in accordance with industry accepted practice within the relevant regulatory framework.

This report should be read in conjunction with the limitations presented in Section 15 of this report.


REFERENCES

Regulatory Publications or Guidelines

LANDCOM NSW 2004; ‘The Blue Book Managing Urban Stormwater Soils and Construction’

NEPC 2013, ‘National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 No. 1’ Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2013L00768

NSW DEC 2006, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd edition)' ISBN 1 74137 859 1, Department of Environment and Conservation NSW.

NSW EPA 1995, 'Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines', ISBN 0 7310 3756 1.

NSW OEH 2011, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites', ISBN 0 7310 3892 4, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.

SafeWork NSW; multiple publications

Work Health and Safety Regulation, NSW Government, 1 July 2011

Reference Reports & Supporting Information

Geotest Services 2017, Preliminary Site Investigation, 17&19 Schofields Road Schofields. Ref. P30868.1_R01 February 2017


YOUR GEOTEST SERVICES DOCUMENT LIMITATIONS

It is critical you grasp your Geotest Services document as a whole as it has been prepared on the basis of a specific objective and scope as interpreted by Geotest Services and applies only to the site or nominated area assessed.

The scope of works and report was prepared in response to specific instructions from the Geotest Service’s client whom the report is addressed to. The scope, analysis, evaluations, conclusions and opinions presented in the report are based on these instructions from the client and information available and collected during our assessment.

The subsurface and ground conditions of the questioned property are subject to change over time from both natural and anthropogenic factors. The report presented has been prepared on the ground conditions observed at this time. Decisions should not be made on the basis of this report if it has been impacted by time.

The report has been prepared to accurately determine site conditions whilst working within the budgetary and scope of work constraints given to Geotest. This may include physical, occupant or any other constraint at the site preventing access for investigation. Ground conditions may differ from those encountered in the report. No report can practically qualify the exact sub-conditions present across the entire site at any given time.

The conclusions above are based on the selective sampling programme which is targeted to be representative of the site and conditions of the immediate area if reported. The document is set out using relevant regulatory authority guidelines and industry accepted practices. The document conclusions do not provide a guarantee that the ground conditions between those sampling points investigated are indifferent to those assessed.

The document Geotest Services has prepared for you should not be used for any other purpose than that originally specified in the report and at the time of commissioning.

The report and its appendices, supporting documents should be read in completeness and certainly not separated. The report will not be conclusive if a single section is interpreted without the support of the remaining components.

To prevent any mis-interpretations of the report, Geotest Services recommends the client or end user contact them with any mis-understood or environmental queries relating to this report.

Title:

Site Locality Figure:

Figure 1 Project No:

P30812.1_R01 1. Project: Preliminary Site Investigation

Scale: Not to Scale

Location: 17 & 19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW

Date: 17/01/2017

Client: Clearstate Development Co. Pty Ltd

Drawn: A.H

Title:

Site Layout & areas of Environmental Concern Figure:


P30812.1_R01

1. Project:

Preliminary Site Investigation Scale: Not to Scale


Date: 17/01/2017


Drawn: A.H

Title:

Remediation Areas & Extents Figure:


P30868.1_R02

Project:

Remedial Action Plan Scale:Not to Scale


Date:20/02/2017


Drawn:A.H

Table 1 Adopted Site Land Use CriteriaRemedial Action Plan (RAP) 17&19 Schofields Rd Schofields NSW P30812.1_R02

Group Analyte Units PQLNEPM HSLs 2013 HSL A & HSL B

(Sand)*

NEPM (2013) HIL A #

GUIDANCE Ecological

Investigation Levels (EILs)

^ Ecological Screening Levels

(ESLs)

Metals & Inorganics Arsenic mg/kg <3 100 100Boron mg/kg <0.5 4500Cadmium mg/kg <0.3 20Chromium mg/kg <0.3 100 190-400Cobalt mg/kg <0.5 100Copper mg/kg <0.5 6000 60-230Cyanide mg/kg <1 250Beryllium mg/kg <0.5 60Lead mg/kg <1 300 1100Managanese mg/kg <1 3800Mercury mg/kg <0.5 40Nickel mg/kg <0.5 400 30-560Selenium mg/kg 200 200Zinc mg/kg <0.05 7400 70-1300

OCP 4.4'-DDD mg/kg <0.1

4.4'-DDE mg/kg <0.1

4.4'-DDT mg/kg <0.1 180"Aldrin & Dieldrin mg/kg <0.1 6Chlordanes - Total mg/kg <0.1 50Dieldrin mg/kg <0.1 3Endosulfan I mg/kg <0.1 270Endrin mg/kg <0.1 10Heptachlor mg/kg <0.1 6Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg <0.1 10Methoxychlor mg/kg <0.1 300Toxaphene mg/kg <0.1 20

Herbicides & Other Pesticides 2,4,5-T mg/kg 6002,4-D mg/kg 900Atrazine mg/kg 320Bifenthrin mg/kg 600Chlorpyrifos mg/kg 160MCPA mg/kg 600MCPB mg/kg 600Mecoprop mg/kg 600Picloram mg/kg 4500

Other Organics PCBs 1Benzene mg/kg 0.1 0.5 65Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 55 125o-Xylene mg/kg 0.1 40 125Toluene mg/kg 0.1 160 105Naphthalene mg/kg <0.5 3F2 TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg <50 110 120 **F3 TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg <100 1300F4 TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg <100 5600F1 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg <20 44 180 **

PAH Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg <0.5 0.7Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound)* mg/kg <0.6 3Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound)* mg/kg <0.5 3Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound)* mg/kg <0.5 3Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 3Total PAH mg/kg < 0.5 300

Asbestos ACM Quantification % w/w 0.01 0.01AF/FA Quantification % w/w 0.001 0.001

*NEPM Table 1A(3) HSLs Vapour Intrusion, HSL A & HSL B Low - High Density Residential; adopting (Sand)# NEPM Table 1A (1) Column A Standard Residential Land Uses 2013

^NEPM Table 1B(6) ESLs TPH fractions F1 – F4, BTEX and benzo(a)pyrene in soil adopting fine grained

Soil Health Screening Levels for Direct Contact (Intrusive Maintenance Workers)

CRC Care (2011) Table A4 Direct Contact HSL-A

Benzene mg/kg 0.1 100Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 4500 -o-Xylene mg/kg 0.1 12000 -Toluene mg/kg 0.1 14000 -Naphthalene mg/kg <0.5 1400 -F2 TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg <50 3300 -F3 TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg <100 4500 -F4 TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg <100 6300 -F1 TRH C6-C10 mg/kg <20 4400 -

NEPM Notes:

** - To obtain F1, subtract the sum of BTEX concentrations from C6-C10 fraction and subtract naphthalene from >C10-C16 to obtain F2.

(8) PCBs: HIL relates to non-dioxin-like PCBs only. Where a PCB source is known, or suspected, to be present at a site, a site-specific assessment of exposure to all PCBs (including dioxin-like PCBs) should be undertaken.

HIL B � Residential with minimal opportunities for soil access; includes dwellings with fully and permanently paved yard space such as high-rise buildings and apartments.

HIL C � Public open space such as parks, playgrounds, playing fields (e.g. ovals), secondary schools and footpaths. This does not include undeveloped public open space where the potential for exposure is lower and where a site-specific assessment may be more

appropriate.

HIL D � Commercial/industrial, includes premises such as shops, offices, factories and industrial sites.

(2) Arsenic: HIL assumes 70% oral bioavailability. Site-specific bioavailability may be important and should be considered where appropriate (refer Schedule B7).

(3) Lead: HIL is based on blood lead models (IEUBK for HILs A, B and C and adult lead model for HIL D where 50% oral bioavailability has been considered. Site-specific bioavailability may be important and should be considered where appropriate.

(4) Methyl mercury: assessment of methyl mercury should only occur where there is evidence of its potential source. It may be associated with inorganic mercury and anaerobic microorganism activity in aquatic environments. In addition the reliability and quality of

sampling/analysis should be considered.

HIL A � Residential with garden/accessible soil (home grown produce <10% fruit and vegetable intake (no poultry), also includes childcare centres, preschools and primary schools.

TRH/BTEX

(5) Elemental mercury: HIL does not address elemental mercury. A site-specific assessment should be considered if elemental mercury is present, or suspected to be present,

(6) Carcinogenic PAHs: HIL is based on the 8 carcinogenic PAHs and their TEFs (potency relative to B(a)P) adopted by CCME 2008 (refer Schedule B7). The B(a)P TEQ is calculated by multiplying the concentration of each carcinogenic PAH in the sample by its

B(a)P TEF, given below, and summing these products.

7) Total PAHs: HIL is based on the sum of the 16 PAHs most commonly reported for contaminated sites (WHO 1998). The application of the total PAH HIL should consider the presence of carcinogenic PAHs and naphthalene (the most volatile PAH). Carcinogenic

PAHs reported in the total PAHs should meet the B(a)P TEQ HIL. Naphthalene reported in the total PAHs should meet the relevant HSL.

240 (combined limit)

~ In the absense of background information we have adopted the 'aged' criteria for EILs

TRH/BTEX

No visible asbestos within <100mm final surface

(1) Generic land uses are described in detail in Schedule B7 Section 3

Table 1 Site Criteria.xlsx


APPENDIX A Geotest Services, PSI, February 2017

16

(A) – 17&19 Schofields Road (Lot 205 in DP 1189773) Preliminary Site Investigation Report (B) – 17&19 Schofields Road (Lot 206 in DP 1189773) 17 & 19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW P30868.1_R01

8 REFERENCES

ASRIS. (2011). ASRIS - Australian Soil Resource Information System. http://www.asris.csiro.au. Accessed 16th January 2017.

NEPC 2013, ‘National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 No. 1’ Federal

Register of Legislative Instruments F2013L00768.

NSW DEC 2006, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd edition)' ISBN 1 74137 859 1, Department

of Environment and Conservation NSW.

NSW OEH 2011, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites', ISBN 0 7310 3892 4, NSW

Office of Environment and Heritage.

NSW Office Of Water Groundwater online resource http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/water.stm;

NSW EPA Contaminated Land Records http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prclmapp/searchregister.aspx.

http://www.asris.csiro.au/

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/water.stm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prclmapp/searchregister.aspx

17

(A) – 17&19 Schofields Road (Lot 205 in DP 1189773) Preliminary Site Investigation Report (B) – 17&19 Schofields Road (Lot 206 in DP 1189773) 17 & 19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW P30868.1_R01

9 YOUR GEOTEST SERVICES DOCUMENT LIMITATIONS

It is critical you grasp your Geotest Services document as a whole, as it has been prepared on the basis of a specific objective and

scope as interpreted by Geotest Services and applies only to the site or nominated area assessed.

The scope of works and report was prepared in response to specific instructions from the Geotest Service’s client whom the report is

addressed to. The scope, analysis, evaluations, conclusions and opinions presented in the report are based on these instructions from

the client and information available and collected during our assessment.

The visual ground conditions of the questioned property are subject to change over time from both natural and anthropogenic factors.

The report presented has been prepared on the conditions observed at this time. Decisions should not be made on the basis of this

report if it has been impacted by time.

The report has been prepared to accurately determine site conditions whilst working within the budgetary and scope of work constraints

given to Geotest. This may include physical, occupant or any other constraint at the site preventing access for investigation. Ground

conditions may differ from those encountered in the report. No intrusive works have been carried out as part of this assessment. No

report can practically qualify the exact sub-conditions present across the entire site at any given time.

The conclusions above are based on observed site conditions of the immediate area if reported. The document is set out using relevant

regulatory authority guidelines and industry accepted practices. The document conclusions do not provide a guarantee that the ground

conditions at the site are as those described within the report, if reported.

The document Geotest Services has prepared for you should not be used for any other purpose than that originally specified in the

report and at the time of commissioning.

The report and its appendices, supporting documents should be read in completeness and certainly not separated. The report will not

be conclusive if a single section is interpreted without the support of the remaining components.

To prevent any mis-interpretations of the report, Geotest Services recommends the client or end user contact them with any mis-

understood or environmental queries relating to this report.

Title:

Site Locality Figure:


P30812.1_R01 1. Project: Preliminary Site Investigation

Scale: Not to Scale


Date: 17/01/2017


Drawn: A.H

Title:

Site Layout & areas of Environmental Concern Figure:


P30812.1_R01

1. Project:

Preliminary Site Investigation Scale: Not to Scale


Date: 17/01/2017


Drawn: A.H

(A) – 17 &19 Schofields Road (Lot 205 in DP 1189773) Preliminary Site Investigation Report (B) – 17 &19 Schofields Road (Lot 206 in DP 1189773) 17 & 19 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW P30868.1_R01

APPENDIX A

Phase 1 Historical Land Information

Historical Titles Search

S149 Search

NSW EPA Contaminated Land Report

NSW EPA POEO Search

NSW Office of Water ‘all groundwater map' Search Results

Land History Search ABN: 29 890 020 153 PO Box 344 Rozelle NSW 2039 0459 254 593 [email protected]

JOB REFERENCE No. LHS161254 DATE: 16th JANUARY 2017

GEOTEST SERVICES PTY LTD 18/24 GARLING ROAD KINGS PARK NSW 2148

ATT: ALAN HALPIN RE: LOT 205 & 206 IN DP 1189773, 17-19 SCHOFIELDS ROAD, SCHOFIELDS

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH

FOLIO IDENTIFIER 205/1189773 & 206/1189773

DEPOSITED PLAN DP 1189773

SEARCH DATE 16TH JANUARY 2017

REGISTERED PROPRIETOR/S ANTHONY AGIUS JANE AGIUS

TITLE TREE

FOLIO IDENTIFIER 205/1189773 FOLIO IDENTIFIER 206/1189773

FOLIO IDENTIFIER 23/13137 FOLIO IDENTIFIER 24/13137

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 5908 FOLIO 136 CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 5796 FOLIO 107 CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 3353 FOLIO 212

HISTORY SUMMARY OF PROPRIETORS

FOLIO IDENTIFIERS 205/1189773 & 206/1189773 1914 – TO DATE ANTHONY AGIUS

OPERATOR JANE AGIUS WIFE

FOLIO IDENTIFIERS 23/13137 & 24/13137

1988 – 2014 AS ABOVE

LHS

Page 1

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 5908 FOLIO 136

1969 – 1988 AS ABOVE 1950 – 1969 HRYSKO KOTLJAR

RAILWAY EMPLOYEE 1948 – 1950 MAVIS ADELINE LANE

WIFE OF CECIL RHODES JANE PAINTER

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 5796 FOLIO 107 1948 – 1948 AS ABOVE 1948 – 1948 ETHEL ISOBEL PRING

WIDOW CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 3353 FOLIO 212

1942 – 1948 AS ABOVE 1922 – 1942 ROLLO OSCAR PRING

ACCOUNTANT

The information presented within this report is understood to be accurate and true based on received third party search information. LHS will not be held liable for miss-information provided by NSW Government Land and Property Information services, information brokers or the interpretation of this information which has been fully relied upon in the preparation of this report.

Page 2

InfoTrackAn Approved LPI NSW

Information BrokerTitle Search

LAND AND PROPERTY INFORMATION NEW SOUTH WALES - TITLE SEARCH ------------------------------------------------------------

FOLIO: AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 ------

SEARCH DATE TIME EDITION NO DATE ----------- ---- ---------- ---- 16/1/2017 7:32 PM 5 15/10/2014

LAND ---- LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE OF PARCELS AT SCHOFIELDS LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA BLACKTOWN PARISH OF GIDLEY COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND TITLE DIAGRAM DP1189773

FIRST SCHEDULE -------------- ANTHONY AGIUS JANE AGIUS AS JOINT TENANTS

SECOND SCHEDULE (5 NOTIFICATIONS) --------------- 1 RESERVATIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE CROWN GRANT(S) 2 D882432 COVENANT 3 AB915525 LEASE TO TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED OF PART OF LOT 205 SHOWN HATCHED IN PLAN WITH AB915525. COMMENCES: 1/10/2010. EXPIRES: 30/9/2015. AC854609 VARIATION OF LEASE AB915525 AC854610 TRANSFER OF LEASE AB915525 LESSEE NOW 3GIS PTY LIMITED AD386439 TRANSFER OF LEASE AB915525 LESSEE NOW TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED 4 AD975540 LEASE TO OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED OF THE PART OF LOT 205 SHOWN HATCHED IN PLAN (PAGE 16) WITH AD975540. COMMENCING 1/10/2010. EXPIRES: 30/9/2015. * 5 AJ674139 CAVEAT BY DNW PROPERTY GROUP PTY LTD

NOTATIONS ---------

UNREGISTERED DEALINGS: NIL

SCHEDULE OF PARCELS ------------------- LOTS 205-206 IN DP1189773.

*** END OF SEARCH ***

LHS161254 PRINTED ON 16/1/2017

* Any entries preceded by an asterisk do not appear on the current edition of the Certificate of Title. Warning: the information appearing undernotations has not been formally recorded in the Register. InfoTrack an approved NSW Information Broker hereby certifies that the informationcontained in this document has been provided electronically by the Registrar General in accordance with Section 96B(2) of the Real PropertyAct 1900.


Information BrokerTitle Search

LAND AND PROPERTY INFORMATION NEW SOUTH WALES - TITLE SEARCH ------------------------------------------------------------

FOLIO: AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 ------

SEARCH DATE TIME EDITION NO DATE ----------- ---- ---------- ---- 16/1/2017 8:10 PM 5 15/10/2014

LAND ---- LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE OF PARCELS AT SCHOFIELDS LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA BLACKTOWN PARISH OF GIDLEY COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND TITLE DIAGRAM DP1189773

FIRST SCHEDULE -------------- ANTHONY AGIUS JANE AGIUS AS JOINT TENANTS

SECOND SCHEDULE (5 NOTIFICATIONS) --------------- 1 RESERVATIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE CROWN GRANT(S) 2 D882432 COVENANT 3 AB915525 LEASE TO TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED OF PART OF LOT 205 SHOWN HATCHED IN PLAN WITH AB915525. COMMENCES: 1/10/2010. EXPIRES: 30/9/2015. AC854609 VARIATION OF LEASE AB915525 AC854610 TRANSFER OF LEASE AB915525 LESSEE NOW 3GIS PTY LIMITED AD386439 TRANSFER OF LEASE AB915525 LESSEE NOW TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED 4 AD975540 LEASE TO OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED OF THE PART OF LOT 205 SHOWN HATCHED IN PLAN (PAGE 16) WITH AD975540. COMMENCING 1/10/2010. EXPIRES: 30/9/2015. * 5 AJ674139 CAVEAT BY DNW PROPERTY GROUP PTY LTD

NOTATIONS ---------

UNREGISTERED DEALINGS: NIL

SCHEDULE OF PARCELS ------------------- LOTS 205-206 IN DP1189773.



* Any entries preceded by an asterisk do not appear on the current edition of the Certificate of Title. Warning: the information appearing undernotations has not been formally recorded in the Register. InfoTrack an approved NSW Information Broker hereby certifies that the informationcontained in this document has been provided electronically by the Registrar General in accordance with Section 96B(2) of the Real PropertyAct 1900.


Information Broker

HistoricalTitle

LAND AND PROPERTY INFORMATION NEW SOUTH WALES - HISTORICAL SEARCH -----------------------------------------------------------------

SEARCH DATE ----------- 16/1/2017 7:34PM

FOLIO: 205/1189773 ------

First Title(s): OLD SYSTEM Prior Title(s): 23/13137

Recorded Number Type of Instrument C.T. Issue -------- ------ ------------------ ---------- 8/10/2013 DP1189773 DEPOSITED PLAN LOT RECORDED FOLIO NOT CREATED

15/10/2014 AI861878 TRANSFER FOLIO CREATED CT NOT ISSUED 15/10/2014 AI958790 CONVERTED TO CONSOL CREATED AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 CT NOT ISSUED



InfoTrack an approved NSW Information Broker hereby certifies that the information contained in this document has been providedelectronically by the Registrar General in accordance with Section 96B(2) of the Real Property Act 1900.


Information Broker

HistoricalTitle


SEARCH DATE ----------- 16/1/2017 8:09PM

FOLIO: 206/1189773 ------

First Title(s): OLD SYSTEM Prior Title(s): 24/13137

Recorded Number Type of Instrument C.T. Issue -------- ------ ------------------ ---------- 8/10/2013 DP1189773 DEPOSITED PLAN LOT RECORDED FOLIO NOT CREATED

15/10/2014 AI861878 TRANSFER FOLIO CREATED CT NOT ISSUED 15/10/2014 AI958790 CONVERTED TO CONSOL CREATED AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 CT NOT ISSUED





Information Broker

HistoricalTitle


SEARCH DATE ----------- 16/1/2017 7:39PM

FOLIO: 23/13137 ------

First Title(s): SEE PRIOR TITLE(S) Prior Title(s): VOL 5908 FOL 136

Recorded Number Type of Instrument C.T. Issue -------- ------ ------------------ ---------- 17/12/1988 TITLE AUTOMATION PROJECT LOT RECORDED FOLIO NOT CREATED

22/6/1993 CONVERTED TO CONSOL CREATED AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 CT NOT ISSUED

15/10/2014 AI958641 EXCISED FROM AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 15/10/2014 AI861878 TRANSFER FOLIO CANCELLED





Information Broker

HistoricalTitle


SEARCH DATE ----------- 16/1/2017 8:12PM

FOLIO: 24/13137 ------

First Title(s): SEE PRIOR TITLE(S) Prior Title(s): VOL 5908 FOL 136

Recorded Number Type of Instrument C.T. Issue -------- ------ ------------------ ---------- 17/12/1988 TITLE AUTOMATION PROJECT LOT RECORDED FOLIO NOT CREATED

22/6/1993 CONVERTED TO CONSOL CREATED AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 CT NOT ISSUED

15/10/2014 AI958641 EXCISED FROM AUTO CONSOL 5908-136 15/10/2014 AI861878 TRANSFER FOLIO CANCELLED




Req:R040727 /Doc:CT 05908-136 CT /Rev:08-Aug-2012 /Sts:OK.OK /Prt:16-Jan-2017 19:40 /Seq:1 of 2Ref:LHS161254 /Src:M

Applicant Details

You r reference N/A


Certificate Details

Certificate no. PL2016/21543

Date issued 28 December 2016

Receipt no. D000570210

Property information @

Property ID 364462 Land ID

LOT 205 DP 1189773

Blacktown City

Fee: $53.00

Urgency fee: N/ A

364462

Legal description

Address 17 SCHOFIELDS ROAD SCHOFIELDS NSW 2762

County CUMBERLAND Parish GIDLEY

PLANNING CERTIFICATE (149 Part 2)

Council

Blacktown City Council prepared this Planning Certificate under Section 149 of the Environmental

Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The form and content of the Certificate is consistent with

Schedule 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

Disclaimer

Blacktown City Council gives notice and points out to all users of the information supplied herein, that the

information herein has been compiled by Council from sources outside of Council's cont rol. While the

informat ion herein is provided with all due care and in good faith, it is provided on the basis that Council wi ll

not accept any responsibility for and will not be liable for its contents or for any consequ ence arisi ng from its

use, and every user of such information is advised to make all necessary enquiries from the appropriate

organisations, inst itutions and the like.

Blacktown Ci ty Council also gives notice to all users of the information supplied herein, wherever any

particular enqu iry herein remains unanswered or has not been elaborated upon, such silence should not be

interpreted as meaning or inferring ei ther a negative or a positive response as the case may be.

28 December 2016 Section 149 Certif icate No. PL2016/21543

Section 149(2)

The following information is provided under Section 149(2) of the Environmental Planning and

Assessment Act 1979. The information relates to the subject land at the date of this Certificate.

1. Names of relevant planning instruments and development control

plans

1.1 Environmental Planning Inst rument

As at the date of this certificate the abovementioned land is not affected by Blacktown Loca l Environmental Plan 2015.

The land is affected by the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006.

1.2 Proposed Local Environmental Plans

Not app licable.

1.3 State Environmental Planning Pol icies

Attachment 1 contains a list of State Environmental Planning Policies that may apply to the

carrying out of development on the subject land.

1.4 Proposed State Environmental Planning Policies

Council is not aware of any proposed State Environmental Planning Policy that is or has been

the subject of community consu ltation or on public exhibition under the Act, applying to the

subject land.

1.5 Development control plans

As at the date of this certificate the abovementioned land is affected by the NSW Government's Blacktown City Council Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan 2014.

Blacktown Development Control Plan 2015 generally does not apply to land that a Precinct Plan applies to, except where specifically referred to in the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 or the Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan 2014.

2. Zoning and land use under relevant environmental planning

instruments

Blacktown City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liabil ity - Please See page 1 of this Certificate Page 2 of 12

28 December 2016 Section 149 Certificate No. PL2016/2 1543

The following information will assist in determining how the subject land may be developed.

It is recommended that you read this section in conjunction with a full copy of any relevant

environmental planning instrument as there may be additional provisions that affect how the

land may be developed.

2.1 Zoning

Under State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006, the land is

zoned:

Zone R3 Medium Density Residential

Below is an extract from the principal Environmental Planning Instrument, outlining the

types of development that may or may not be carried out in the above zone.

2 Permitted without consent

Home occupations

3 Permitted with consent

Attached dwellings; Bed and breakfast accommodation; Boarding houses; Child care

centres; Community facilities; Dual occupancies; Dwelling houses; Group homes;

Manor homes; Multi dwelling housing; Neighbourhood shops; Places of public

worship; Residential flat buildings; Roads; Secondary dwellings; Semi-detached

dwellings; Seniors housing; Shop top housing; Studio dwellings; Any other

development not specified in item 2 or 4

4 Prohibited

Agriculture; Air transport facilities; Airstrips; Amusement centres; Boat repair

facilities; Boat sheds; Business premises; Caravan parks; Cemeteries; Charter and

tourism boating facilities; Correctional centres; Crematoria; Depots; Electricity

generating works; Entertainment facilities; Extractive industries; Freight transport

facilities; Function centres; Helipads; Highway service centres; Home occupations

(sex services); Industrial retail outlets; Industries; Information and education

facilities; Marinas; M ortuaries; Office premises; Passenger transport facilities; Port

facilities; Public administration buildings; Recreation facilities (indoor); Recreation

facilities (major); Recreation facilities (outdoor); Registered clubs; Restriction

facilities; Retail premises; Rural supplies; Rural workers' dwellings; Service stations;

Sex services premises; Signage; Storage premises; Tourist and visitor

accommodation; Transport depots; Truck depots; Vehicle body repair workshops;

Vehicle repair stations; Vehicle sales or hire premises; Waste management facilities;

Waste or resource management facilities; Wholesale supplies.

Zone REl Public Recreation



Blacktown City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liability - Please See page 1 of this Certificate Page 3 of 12

28 December 2016 Section 149 Certificate No. PL2016/21543


Nil


Building identification signs; Business identification signs; Community facilities;

Drainage; Earthworks; Environmental facilities; Environmental protection works;

Flood mitigation works; Kiosks; Recreation areas; Recreation f acilities (indoor};

Recreation facilit ies (outdoor}; Roads; Water recycling facilities; Waterbodies

( artificial}

4 Prohibited

Any development not specified in item 2 or 3.

Zone SP2 Infrastructure


types of development that may or may not be ca rried out in the above zone.


Nil


The purpose shown on the Land Zoning Map, including any development that is ordinarily incidental or ancillary to development for that purpose; Drainage; Earthworks; Environmental protection works; Flood mitigation works; Roads; Water recycling facilities; Waterbodies (artificial}

4 Prohibited Any other development not specified in item 2 or 3.

The land is affected by a 'Transport Corridor Investigation Area' shown as a hatched overlay

marked 'N' on the Land Zoning Map under State Environmental Planning Policy {Sydney

Region Growth Centres} 2006. Appendix 4 Clause 6.10 of the Instrument states that:

6.10 Development of land within or adjacent to public transport corridor

(1) Consent must not be granted to development in the area marked "N" on the Land Zon ing

Map without the concurrence of Transport of NSW.

(2) In determining whether to provide concurrence, Transport for NSW is to take into

account the likely effect ofthe development on:

(a) the practicability and cost of carrying out public t ransport projects on the land in

the future, and

Blacktown City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liability- Please See page 1 of this Certificate Page 4 of 12

-

28 December 2016 Section 149 Certificate No. PL2016/ 21543

(b) without limiting paragraph (a), the structural integrity or safety of, or ability to

operate, public transport projects on the land and in the future, and

(c) without limiting paragraph (a), the land acquisition costs and the costs of

construction, operation or maintenance of public transport projects on the land in

the future .

2.2 Minimum land dimensions for the erection of a dwelling house

Not applicable

2.3 Critical habitat

The land does not include or comprise a critical habitat.

Note: Critical habitat registers are kept by the National Parks and Wildlife Service under the Threatened Species

Conservation Act 1995 and the Department of Fisheries under the Fisheries M anagement Act 1994.

2.4 Conservation areas

The land is not within a conservation area.

2.5 Environmental Heritage

The land does not contain an item of environmental heritage under the protection of State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006

3. Complying development

Complying development may or may not be carried out on the subject land under an

Environmenta l Planning Po licy. Counci l does not have sufficient information to determine

the extent to which specific complying development may or may not be carried out.

4. Coastal protection

The subject land is not affected by the operation of Sections 38 or 39 of the Coastal

Protection Act, 1979.

5. Mine subsidence

The subject land has not been proclaimed to be a mine subsidence district within the

meaning of Section 15 of the Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961 .

6. Road widening and road realignment

The land is affected by a road pattern .

Blacktown City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liability- Please See page 1 of this Certificate Page s of 12

28 December 2016 Section 149 Certificate No. PL2016/2 1S43

7. Council and other public authority policies on hazard risk restrictions

7.1 Contaminated Lands Policy and Asbestos Policy

Council has adopted a Contaminated Lands Policy and an Asbestos Policy which may restrict

development on the subject land.

The Land Contamination Policy applies when zoning or land use changes are proposed on

land which has previously been used for certain purposes or has the potential to be affected

by such purposes undertaken on nearby lands. The Asbestos Policy applies where land

contains, or is likely to have contained in the past, buildings or structures that were erected

prior to the banning of asbestos. Both policies shou ld be considered in the context of

relevant State legislation and guidelines.

Council's records may not be sufficient to determine all previous uses on the land, or

determine activities that may have taken place on this land.

7 .2 Other policies on hazard risk restrictions

Council has not adopted any other policies to restrict the development of the subject land by

reason of the likelihood of landslip, bushfire, tidal inundation, subsidence or the occurrence

of acid sulphate soils.

Note: Although Council has not adopted a specific policy to restrict development bushfire prone land, it is bound

by state-wide bushfire legislation that may restrict development on the subject land. Additional information

relating to bushfire prone land is provided at point 11 below.

7a. Flood related development controls information

This lot is shown flood prone on mapping provided by the Department of Planning. The investigation for this area has not been completed and all enquiries should be directed to the Department of Planning. Flood related development controls for this lot are provided in the Development Control Plan for this area, prepared by the Department of Planning. Where development is proposed within or adjacent to land that is shown on the Flood Prone Land figure as being affected by the 1% AEP level, Council may require a more detailed flood study to be undertaken by the applicant to confirm the extent on the flood affectation on that land.

8. Land reserved for acquisition

State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 makes provision

for land included on the Land Reservation Acquisition Map to be acquired by a public

authority.

Blacktown City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liability- Please See page 1 of th is Certificate Page 6 of 12

28 December 2016 Sect ion 149 Certificate No. PL2016/2 1543

9. Contributions plans

Council currently levies contributions under Section 94 of the Environmental Planning &

Assessment Act 1979 for facilities and services. The further development of the subject land

may incur such contributions.

Contributions Plan No. 20 - Riverstone and Alex Avenue Precincts applies to the subject land.

9a. Biodiversity certified land

The land is not biodiversity certified land as defined by Part 7 AA of the Threatened Species

Conservation Act 1995.

10. Biobanking agreements

The land is not subject to any biobanking agreement under Part 7 A of the Threatened

Species Conservation Act 1995.

11. Bushfire prone land

The Rural Fires and Environmenta l Assessment Legislation Amendment Act 2002, which

came into force on 1 August 2002, introduced development provisions for bush fire prone

land as shown on a Bush Fire Prone Land Map. " Bush fire prone land" is land that has been

designated by t he Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service as being bush fire prone due

t o characteristics of vegetation and topography. The land the subject of this certificate has

been identified on Council 's Bush Fire Prone Land Map as being:

Bushfire - 100m buffer

On land that is bush fire prone, certain development may require further considerat ion

under Section 79BA or Section 91 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and

under Section l OOB of the Rural Fires Act 1997.

12. Property vegetation plans

The subject land is not affected by a property vegetation plan under the Native Vegetation

Act 2003. The Blacktown loca l governm ent area is excluded from the operat ion of the Native

Vegetation Act 2003 (refer Schedule 1 Part 3 of that Act).

13. Orders under Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006

No. Council has not been notified of any o rder made under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 in relation to the subject land.

14. Directions under Part 3A

Land t o which this Certificate applies is not subject to the above.

Blacktown City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liability - Please See page 1 of th is Certificate Page 7 of 12


15. Site compatibility certificates and conditions for seniors housing

Land to which this Certificate applies is not subject to the above.

16. Site compatibility certificates for infrastructure


17. Site compatibility certificates and conditions for affordable rental

housing


18. Paper subdivision information

Not applicable

19. Site verification certificates

Council is not aware of any site verification certificate applying to the subject land.

Under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 and Contaminated Land Management

Amendment Act 2008

(a) The land to which this certificate relates has not been declared to be significantly contaminated land at the date when the certificate was issued

(b) The land to which the certificate relates is not subject to a management order at the da te when the certificate was issued

(c) The land to wh ich this certificate relates is not the subject of an approved volunta ry management proposal at the date when the certificate was issued

(d) The land to which this ce rtificate relates is not subject to an ongoing maintenance order as at the date when the certificate was issued

(e) The land to which this certificate relates is not the subject of a site audit statement provided to the Council.



Attachment 1 - State Environmental Planning Policies

In addition to the principal environmental planning instrument identified in section 2.1 of this

Certificate, the following State Environmental Planning Policies may also affect development on the

subject land .

SEPP {Affordable Rental Housing) 2009

Establishes a consistent planning regime for the provision of affordable rental housing. The policy provides incentives for new affordable rental housing, facilitates the retention of existing affordable renta ls, and expands the role of not-for-profit providers. It also aims to support local centres by providing housing for workers close to places of work, and facilitate development of housing for the homeless and other disadvantaged people.

SEPP Building Sustainability Index (BASIX) 2004

This SEPP operates in conjunction with Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX} Regulation 2004 to ensure the effective introduction of BASIX in NSW. The SEPP ensures consistency in the implementation of BASIX throughout the State by overriding competing provisions in other environmental planning instruments and development control plans, and specifying that SEPP 1 does not apply in relation to any development standard arising under BASIX. The draft SEPP was exhibited together with draft Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX} Regulation 2004.

SEPP (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008

This policy provides exempt and complying development codes that have State-wide application, identifying, in t he General Exempt Development Code, types of development that are of minimal environmental impact that may be carried out without the need for development consent and, in the General Housing Code, types of complying development that may be carried out in accordance with a complying development certificate as defined in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

SEPP (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006

This policy provides for the coordinated release of land for residential, employment and other urban development in Sydney's North West and South West Growth Centres, in conjunction with the precinct planning provisions contained in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

SEPP (Housing for Seniors and People with a Disability) 2004

This policy encourages the development of high quality accommodation for the state's ageing population and for people who have disabilities, whilst ensuring development is in keeping with the local neighbourhood. Note the name of this policy was changed from State Environmental Planning Policy (Seniors Living) 2004 to State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004, effective 12.10.07.

SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007

The aim of this policy is to facilitate the orderly and economic use and development of rural lands for rural and related purposes. This SEPP Provides a consistent planning regime for infrastructure and the provision of services across NSW, along with providing for consultation with relevant public authorities during the assessment process. The SEPP supports greater flexibility in the location of infrastructure and service facilities along with improved regulatory certainty and efficiency.



SEPP (Miscellaneous Consent Provisions) 2007 This SEPP contains provisions for temporary structures, subdivision, the demolition of a building or work, certain change of use and fire alarm link communication works.

SEPP (State Significant Precinct s) 2005 The purpose of this Policy is to facilitate the development, redevelopment or protection of important urban, coastal and regional sites of economic, environmental or social significance to the State so as to facilitate the orderly use, development or conservation of those State significant precincts for the benefit of the State. It also aims to facilitate service delivery outcomes for a range of public services and to provide fo r the development of major sites for a public purpose or redevelopment of major sites no longer appropriate or suitable for public purposes.

SEPP (Mining, Pet roleum, Production and Extractive Industries) 2007

This Policy aims to provide for the proper management and development of mineral, petroleum and extractive material resources for the social and economic welfare of the State. The Policy establishes appropriate planning controls to encourage ecologically sustainable development.

SEPP No. 1 - Development Standards

Makes development standards more flexib le. It allows counci ls to approve a development proposal that does not comply with a set standard where this can be shown to be unreasonable or unnecessary.

SEPP No. 19 - Bushland in Urban Areas

Protects and preserves bushland within certain urban areas, as part of the natural heritage or for recreational, educational and scientific purposes. The policy is designed to protect bushland in public open space zones and reservations, and to ensure that bush preservation is given a high priority when local environmental plans for urban development are prepared.

SEPP No. 21 - Caravan Parks

Ensures that where caravan parks or camping grounds are permitted under an environmental planning instrument, movable dwellings, as defined in the Local Government Act 1993, are also permitted. The specific kinds of movable dwellings allowed under the Local Government Act in caravan parks and camping grounds are subject to the provisions of

the Caravan Parks Regulation. The policy ensures that development consent is required for new caravan parks and camping grounds and for additional long-term sites in existing caravan parks. It also enables, with the council 's consent, long-term sites in caravan parks to be subdivided by leases of up to 20 years.

SEPP No. 30 - Intensive Agriculture

Requires development consent for cattle feedlots having a capacity of 50 or more cattle or piggeries having a capacity of 200 or more pigs. The policy sets out information and public notification requirements to ensure there are effective planning control over this exportdriven rural industry. The po licy does not alter if, and where, such development is permitted, or the functions of the consent authority.

SEPP No. 32 - Urban Consolidation

States the Government's intention to ensure that urban consolidation object ives are met in all urban areas throughout the State. The policy focuses on the redevelopment of urban land

Blacktow n City Council For Notice of Disclaimer of Liability - Please See page 1 of this Certificate Page 10 of 12


that is no longer required for the purpose it is currently zoned or used, and encourages local councils to pursue their own urban consolidation strategies to help implement the aims and objectives of the policy. Councils will continue to be responsible for the majority of rezonings. The policy sets out guidelines for the Minister to follow when considering whether to initiate a regional environmental plan (REP) to make particular sites available for consolidated urban redevelopment. Where a site is rezoned by an REP, the Minister will be the consent authority.

SEPP No. 33 - Hazardous and Offensive Development Provides new definitions for 'hazardous industry', 'hazardous storage establishment', 'offensive industry' and 'offensive storage establishment' . The definitions apply to all planning instruments, existing and future. The new definitions enable decisions to approve or refuse a development to be based on the merit of proposal. The consent authority must careful consider the specifics the case, the location and the way in which the proposed activity is to be carried out. The policy also requires specified matters to be considered for proposals that are 'potentially hazardous' or 'potentially offensive' as defined in the policy. For example, any application to carry out a potentially hazardous or potentially offensive development is to be advertised for public comment, and applications to carry out potentially hazardous development must be supported by a preliminary hazard analysis (PHA). The policy does not change the role of councils as consent authorities, land zoning, or the designated development provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

SEPP No. 55 - Remediation of Land

Introduces state-wide planning controls for the remediation of contaminated land. The policy states that land must not be developed if it is unsuitable for a proposed use because it is contaminated. If the land is unsuitable, remediation must take place before the land is developed. The policy makes remediation permissible across the State, defines when consent is required, requires all remediation to comply with standards, ensures land is investigated if contamination is suspected, and requires councils to be notified of all remediation proposals. To assist councils and developers, the Department, in conjunction with the Environment Protection Authority, has prepared Managing Land Contamination: Planning Guidelines.

SEPP No. 62 - Sustainable Aquaculture

Encourages the sustainable expansion of the industry in NSW. The policy implements the regional strategies already developed by creating a simple approach to identity and categorise aquaculture development on the basis of its potential environmental impact. The SEPP also identifies aquaculture development as a designated development on ly where there are potential environmental risks.

SEPP No. 64 - Advertising and Signage

Aims to ensure that outdoor advertising is compatible with the desired amenity and visual character of an area, provides effective communication in suitable locations and is of high quality design and finish. The SEPP was amended in August 2007 to permit and regulate outdoor advertising in transport corridors (e .g. freeways, tollways and rail corridors). The amended SEPP also aims to ensure that public benefits may be derived from advertising along and adjacent to transport corridors. Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines (DOP July 2007) provides information on design criteria, road safety and public benefit requirements for SEPP 64 development applications.


' 28 December 2016 Sect ion 149 Certificate No. PL2016/21543

SEPP No. 65 - Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development

Raises the design quality of residential flat development across the state through the application of a series of design principles. Provides for the establishment of Design Review Panels to provide independent expert advice to councils on the merit of residential flat development. The accompanying regulation requires the involvement of a qualified designer throughout the design, approval and construction stages.

SREP No. 30 - St Marys

Sydney Regiona l Environmenta l Plan 30 - St Marys (SREP 30) provides a statutory framework to plan and develop 1538 hectares of land known as the Australian Defence Industries (ADI) site at St Marys. The plan zones the land for particular types of development: urban, regiona l park, regiona l open space, drainage, road/road widening, and employment.

SEPP (Western Sydney Employment Area) 2009

This State Environmental Planning Policy promotes economic development and the creation of employment in the Western Sydney Employment Area by provid ing for development, including major warehousing, distribution, freight transport, industrial, high technology and research facilities. The policy provides for coordinated planning, development and rezoning of land for employment or environmental conservation purposes.This State Environmental Planning Policy promotes economic development and the creation of employment in the Western Sydney Employment Area by providing for development, including major warehousing, distribution, freight transport, industrial, high technology and research faci lities. The policy provides for coordinated planning, development and rezoning of land for employment or environmenta l conservation purposes.

SEPP (Western Sydney Parklands) 2009

The aim of the policy is to put in place planning controls that will enable the Western Sydney Parklands Trust to develop the Western Parklands into multi-use urban parkland for the region of western Sydney.

SEPP (Western Sydney Recreation Area)

This policy enables development to be ca rried out for recreational, sporting and cultural purposes wi thin the Western Sydney Recreation Area, including the development of a recreation area of state significance.

General Manager

Per ~

End of Certificate


Applicant Details

Your reference N/ A


Certificate Details

Certificate no. PL2016/21544

Date issued 28 December 2016

Receipt no. D000570211

Property information @· Property ID 364462 Land ID

LOT 206 DP 1189773

Blacktown City

Fee: $53.00

Urgency fee: N/ A

364464

Legal description

Address 17 SCHOFIELDS ROAD SCHOFIELDS NSW 2762

County CUMBERLAND Parish GIDLEY

PLANNING CERTIFICATE (149 Part 2)

Council

Blacktown City Council prepared this Planning Certificate under Section 149 of the Environmental

Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The form and content of the Certificate is consistent with

Schedule 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

Disclaimer

Blacktown City Council gives notice and points out to all users of the information suppl ied herein, that the

information herein has been compiled by Council from sources outside of Council's control. While t he

information herein is provided with all due care and in good faith, it is provided on the basis that Council will

not accept any responsibility for and will not be liable for its contents or for any consequence arising from its

use, and every user of such information is advised to make all necessary enqui ries from the appropriate

organisations, institut ions and the like.

Blacktown City Council also gives notice to all users of the information supplied herein, wherever any

particular enquiry herein remains unanswered or has not been elaborated upon, such sil ence should not be

interpreted as meaning or inferring either a negative or a positive response as the case may be.


Section 149{2}

The following information is provided under Section 149(2) of the Environmental Plann ing and

Assessment Act 1979. The information relates to the subject land at the date of this Certificate.

1. Names of relevant planning instruments and development control

plans

1.1 Environmental Planning Instrument

As at the date of this certificate the abovementioned land is not affected by Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 2015.

The land is affected by the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006.

1.2 Proposed Local Environmental Plans

Not applicable.

1.3 State Environmental Planning Policies

Attachment 1 contains a list of State Environmental Planning Policies that may apply to the

carrying out of development on the subject land.

1.4 Proposed State Environmental Planning Policies

Council is not aware of any proposed State Environmental Planning Policy that is or has been

the subject of community consultation or on public exhibition under the Act, applying to the

subject land.

1.5 Development control plans

As at the date of this certificate the above mentioned land is affected by the NSW Government's Blacktown City Council Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan 2014.

Blacktown Development Control Plan 2015 generally does not apply to land that a Precinct Plan applies to, except where specifica lly referred to in the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 or the Growth Centre Precincts Development Control Plan 2014.

2. Zoning and land use under relevant environmental planning

instruments



The following information will assist in determining how the subject land may be developed.

It is recommended that you read this section in conjunction with a full copy of any relevant

environmental planning instrument as there may be additional provisions that affect how the

land may be developed.

2.1 Zoning

Under State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006, the land is

zoned:

Zone R3 Medium Density Residential




Home occupations


Attached dwellings; Bed and breakfast accommodation; Boarding houses; Child care

centres; Community facilities; Dual occupancies; Dwelling houses; Group homes;

Manor homes; Multi dwelling housing; Neighbourhood shops; Places of public

worship; Residential flat buildings; Roads; Secondary dwellings; Semi-detached

dwellings; Seniors housing; Shop top housing; Studio dwellings; Any other

development not specified in item 2 or 4

4 Prohibited

Agriculture; Air transport facilities; Airstrips; Amusement centres; Boat repair

facilities; Boat sheds; Business premises; Caravan parks; Cemeteries; Charter and

tourism boating facilities; Correctional centres; Crematoria; Depots; Electricity

generating works; Entertainment facilities; Extractive industries; Freight transport

facilities; Function centres; Helipads; Highway service centres; Home occupations

(sex services); Industrial retail outlets; Industries; Information and education

facilities; Marinas; Mortuaries; Office premises; Passenger transport facilities; Port

facilities; Public administration buildings; Recreation facilities (indoor); Recreation

facilities (major); Recreation facilities (outdoor); Registered clubs; Restriction

facilities; Retail premises; Rural supplies; Rural workers' dwellings; Service stations;

Sex services premises; Signage; Storage premises; Tourist and visitor

accommodation; Transport depots; Truck depots; Vehicle body repair workshops;

Vehicle repair stations; Vehicle sales or hire premises; Waste management facilities;

Waste or resource management facilities; Wholesale supplies.

Zone SP2 Infrastructure

Below is an extract from the principa l Environmenta l Planning Instrument, outlining the





Nil


The purpose shown on the Land Zoning Map, including any development that is ordinarily incidental or ancillary to development for that purpose; Drainage; Earthworks; Environmental protection works; Flood mitigation works; Roads; Water recycling facilities; Waterbodies ( artificial)

4 Prohibited Any other development not specified in item 2 or 3.

The land is affected by a 'Transport Corridor Investigation Area' shown as a hatched overlay

marked 'N' on the Land Zoning Map under State Environmental Planning Policy {Sydney

Region Growth Centres) 2006. Appendix 4 Clause 6.10 of the Instrument states that:

6.10 Development of land within or adjacent to public transport corridor

(1) Consent must not be granted to development in the area marked "N" on the Land Zoning

Map without the concurrence of Transport for NSW.

(2) In determining whether to provide concurrence, Transport for NSW is to take into

account the likely effect of the development on:

(a) the practicability and cost of carrying out public transport projects on the land in

the future, and

{b) without limiting paragraph (a), the structural integrity or safety of, or ability to

operate, public transport projects on the land in the future, and

(c) without limiting paragraph (a), the land acquisition costs and the costs of

construction, operation or maintenance of public transport projects on the land in

the future .

2.2 Minimum land dimensions for the erect ion of a dwelling house

Not applicable

2.3 Critical habitat

The land does not include or comprise a critical habitat.

Note: Critical habitat registers are kept by the National Parks and Wildlife Service under the Threatened Species

Conservation Act 1995 and the Department of Fisheries under the Fisheries Management Act 1994.



2.4 Conservation areas

The land is not within a conservation area.

2.5 Environmental Heritage

The land does not contain an item of environmenta l heritage under the protection of State Environmental Planning Po licy {Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006

3. Complying development

Complying development may or may not be ca rried out on the subject land under an

Environmental Planning Policy. Council does not have sufficient information to determine

the extent to which specific complying development may or may not be carried out.

4. Coastal protection

The subject land is not affected by the operation of Sections 38 or 39 of the Coastal

Protection Act, 1979.

5. Mine subsidence

The subject land has not been proclaimed to be a mine subsidence district with in the

meaning of Section 15 of the Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961.

6. Road widening and road realignment

The land is affected by a road pattern.

7. Council and other public authority policies on hazard risk restrictions

7.1 Contaminated Lands Policy and Asbestos Policy

Council has adopted a Contaminated Lands Policy and an Asbestos Policy which may restrict

development on the subject land.

The Land Contamination Policy app lies when zoning or land use changes are proposed on

land which has previously been used for certain purposes or has the potential to be affected

by such purposes undertaken on nearby lands. The Asbestos Policy applies where land

contains, or is likely to have contained in the past, buildings or structures that were erected

prior to the banning of asbestos. Both policies should be considered in the context of

relevant State legislation and guidelines.

Council 's records may not be sufficient to determine all previous uses on the land, or

determine activities that may have taken place on this land.

Blacktown City Council For Notice of Discla imer of Liability - Please See page 1 of this Certificate Page 5 of 12


7.2 Other policies on hazard risk restrictions

Counci l has not adopted any other policies to restrict the development of the subject land by

reason of the likelihood of landslip, bushfire, tidal inundation, subsidence or the occurrence

of acid sulphate soils.

Note: Although Council has not adopted a specific policy to restrict development bushfi re prone land, it is bound

by state-wide bushfire legislation that may restrict development on the subject land. Additional information

relating to bushfire prone land is provided at point 11 below.

7a. Flood related development controls information

This lot is shown flood prone on mapping provided by the Department of Planning. The investigation for this area has not been comp leted and all enquiries should be directed to the Department of Planning. Flood related development controls for this lot are provided in the Development Control Plan for this area, prepared by the Department of Planning. Where development is proposed within or adjacent to land that is shown on the Flood Prone Land figure as being affected by the 1% AEP level, Counci l may require a more detailed flood study to be undertaken by the app licant to confirm the extent on the flood affectation on that land.

8. Land reserved for acquisition

State Environmenta l Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006 makes provision

for land included on t he Land Reservation Acquisition Map to be acquired by a public

authority.

9. Contributions plans

Council currently levies contributions under Section 94 of the Environmental Planning &

Assessment Act 1979 for facilities and services. The further development of the subject land

may incur such contributions.

Contributions Plan No. 20 - Riverstone and Alex Avenue Precincts applies to the subject land .

9a. Biodiversity certified land

The land is not biodiversity certified land as defined by Part 7 AA of the Threatened Species

Conservation Act 1995.

10. Biobanking agreements

The land is not subject to any biobanking agreement under Part 7 A of t he Threatened

Species Conservation Act 1995.



11. Bushfire prone land

The Rural Fires and Environmenta l Assessment Legislation Amendment Act 2002, which

came into force on 1 August 2002, introduced development provisions for bush fire prone

land as shown on a Bush Fire Prone Land Map. "Bush fire prone land" is land that has been

designated by the Commissioner of the NSW Rural Fire Service as being bush fire prone due

to characteristics of vegetation and topography. The land the subject of this certificate has

been identified on Council 's Bush Fire Prone Land Map as being:

Bushfire - 100m buffer

On land t hat is bush fire prone, certain development may require further consideration

under Section 79BA or Section 91 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and

under Section 100B of the Rural Fires Act 1997.

12. Property vegetation plans

The subject land is not affected by a property vegetation plan under the Native Vegetation

Act 2003. The Blacktown local government area is excluded from the operation of the Native

Vegetation Act 2003 (refer Schedule 1 Part 3 of that Act).

13. Orders under Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006

No. Council has not been notified of any order made under the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 in re lation to the subject land.

14. Directions under Part 3A


15. Site compatibility certificates and conditions for seniors housing


16. Site compatibility certificates for infrastructure


17. Site compatibility certificates and conditions for affordable rental

housing

Land to which this Certificate applies is not subject to t he above.

18. Paper subdivision information

Not applicable

19. Site verification certificates



Council is not aware of any site verification certificate applying to the subject land.

Under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 and Contaminated Land Management

Amendment Act 2008

(a) The land to wh ich this certificate relates has not been declared to be significantly contaminated land at the date when the certificate was issued

(b) The land to which the certificate relates is not subject to a management order at the date when the certificate was issued

(c) The land to which this certificate relates is not the subject of an approved voluntary management proposal at the date when the certificate was issued

(d) The land to which this certificate relates is not subject to an ongoing maintenance order as at the date when the certificate was issued

(e) The land to which this certificate relates is not the subject of a site audit statement provided to the Council.



Attachment 1- State Environmental Planning Policies

In addition to the principal environmental planning instrument identified in section 2.1 of this

Certificate, the following State Environmental Planning Policies may also affect development on the

subject land.

SEPP (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009

Establishes a consistent plann ing regime for the provision of affordable rental housing. The policy provides incentives for new affordable rental housing, facilitates the retention of existing affordable rentals, and expands the role of not-fo r-profit providers. It also aims to support local centres by providing housing for workers close to places of work, and facilitate development of housing for the homeless and other disadvantaged people.

SEPP Building Sustainability Index (BASIX) 2004

Th is SEPP operates in conjunction with Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment

(Building Sustainability Index: BASIX} Regulation 2004 to ensure the effective introduction of BASIX in NSW. The SEPP ensures consistency in the implementation of BASIX throughout the State by overriding competing provisions in other environmenta l planning instruments and development control plans, and specifying that SEPP 1 does not apply in relation to any development standard arising under BASIX. The draft SEPP was exhibited together with draft Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX} Regulation 2004.

SEPP (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008

This policy provides exempt and comp lying development codes that have State-wide application, identifying, in the General Exempt Deve lopment Code, types of development that are of minimal environmental impact that may be carried out without the need for development consent and, in the General Housing Code, types of complying development that may be carried out in accordance with a complying development certificate as defined in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

SEPP (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006

This policy provides for the coordinated release of land for residentia l, employment and other urban development in Sydney's North West and South West Growth Centres, in conjunction with the precinct planning provisions contained in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000.

SEPP (Housing for Seniors and People w ith a Disability) 2004

This policy encourages the development of high quality accommodation for the state's ageing population and for people who have disabilities, whilst ensuring development is in keeping with the local neighbourhood. Note t he name of this policy was changed from State Environmental Planning Policy (Seniors Living) 2004 to State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004, effective 12.10.07.

SEPP (Infrastructure) 2007

The aim of this policy is to facilit ate the orderly and economic use and development of rural lands for rura l and related purposes. This SEPP Provides a consistent planning regime for infrastructure and t he provision of services across NSW, along with providing for consultation with relevant public authorities during the assessment process. The SEPP supports greater flexibility in the location of infrastructure and service facilities along with improved regulatory certainty and efficiency.



SEPP {Miscellaneous Consent Provisions) 2007

This SEPP contains provisions for temporary structures, subdivision, the demolition of a building or work, certain change of use and fire alarm link communication works.

SEPP {State Significant Precincts) 2005

The purpose of this Po licy is to facilitate the development, redevelopment or protection of important urban, coasta l and regiona l sites of economic, environmental or social significance to the State so as to facilitate the orderly use, development or conservation of those State significant precincts for the benefit of the State. It also aims to facilitate service delivery outcomes for a range of public services and to provide for the development of major sites for a public purpose or redevelopment of major sites no longer appropriate or suitable for public purposes.

SEPP {Mining, Petroleum, Production and Extractive Industries) 2007

This Policy aims to provide for the proper management and development of mineral, petroleum and extractive material resources for the social and economic welfare of the State. The Policy establishes appropriate planning controls to encourage ecologically sustainable development.

SEPP No. 1 - Development Standards

Makes development standards more flexible. It allows councils to approve a development proposal that does not comply with a set standard w here this can be shown to be unreasonable or unnecessary.

SEPP No. 19 - Bushland in Urban Areas

Protects and preserves bushland within certa in urban areas, as part of the natural heritage or for recreational, educational and scient ific purposes. The policy is designed to protect bushland in public open space zones and reservations, and to ensure that bush preservation is given a high priority when loca l environmental plans for urban development are prepared.

SEPP No. 21 - Caravan Parks

Ensures that where ca ravan parks or camping grounds are permitted under an environmental planning instrument, movable dwellings, as defined in the Local Government Act 1993, are also permitted. The specific kinds of movable dwellings allowed under the Local Government Act in caravan parks and camping grounds are subject to the provisions of the Caravan Parks Regulation. The policy ensures that development consent is required for new ca ravan parks and camping grounds and for add itiona l long-term sites in exist ing ca ravan parks. It also enables, w ith the counci l's consent, long-term sites in caravan parks to be subdivided by leases of up to 20 years.

SEPP No. 30 - Intensive Agriculture

Requires development consent fo r cattle feedlots having a capacity of 50 or more cattle or piggeries having a capacity of 200 or more pigs. The policy sets out information and public notification requirements to ensure there are effective planning control over this exportdriven rural industry. The policy does not alter if, and where, such development is permitted, or the functions of the consent authority.

SEPP No. 32 - Urban Consolidation

States the Government's intention to ensure that urban consolidation objectives are met in all urban areas throughout the State. The policy focuses on the redevelopment of urban land



that is no longer required for the purpose it is currently zoned or used, and encourages local councils to pursue their own urban consolidation strategies to help implement the aims and objectives of the policy. Councils will continue to be responsible for the majority of rezonings. The policy sets out guide lines for the Minister to follow when considering whether to initiate a regional environmental plan (REP) to make particular sites available for consolidated urban redeve lopment. Where a site is rezoned by an REP, the Minister will be the consent authority.

SEPP No. 33 - Hazardous and Offensive Development

Provides new definitions for 'hazardous industry', 'hazardous storage establishment', 'offensive industry' and 'offensive storage establishment'. The definitions apply to all planning instruments, existing and future. The new definitions enable decisions to approve or refuse a development to be based on the merit of proposal. The consent authority must careful conside r the specifics the case, the location and the way in which t he proposed activity is to be carried out. The policy also requires specified matters to be considered for proposals that are 'potentially hazardous' or 'potentia lly offensive' as defined in the policy. For example, any application to carry out a potentia lly hazardous or potentially offensive development is to be advertised for public comment, and applications to carry out potentially hazardous development must be supported by a preliminary hazard ana lysis (PHA). The policy does not change the role of councils as consent authorities, land zoning, or the designated development provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

SEPP No. 55 - Remediation of land

Introduces state-wide planning contro ls for the remediation of contaminated land. The policy states that land must not be developed if it is unsuitable for a proposed use because it is contaminated. If the land is unsuitable, remediation must take place before the land is developed. The policy makes remediation permissible across the State, defines when consent is required, requires all remediation to comply with standards, ensures land is investigated if contamination is suspected, and requires councils to be notified of all remediation proposals. To assist councils and developers, the Department, in conjunction with the Environment Protection Authority, has prepared Managing Land Contamination: Planning Guidelines.

SEPP No. 62 - Sustainable Aquaculture

Encourages the sustainable expansion of the industry in NSW. The policy implements the regional strategies already developed by creating a simple approach to identity and categorise aquaculture development on t he basis of its potential environmenta l impact. The SEPP also identifies aquaculture development as a designated development only where there are potential environmental risks.

SEPP No. 64 - Advertising and Signage Aims to ensure that outdoor advertising is compatible with the desired amenity and visual character of an area, provides effective communication in suitable locations and is of high quality design and finish. The SEPP was amended in August 2007 to permit and regulate outdoor advertising in transport corridors (e.g. freeways, tollways and rail corridors) . The amended SEPP also aims to ensure that public benefits may be derived from advertising along and adjacent to transport corridors. Transport Corridor Outdoor Advertising and Signage Guidelines (DOP July 2007) provides information on design criteria, road safety and public benefit requirements for SEPP 64 deve lopment applications.



SEPP No. 65 - Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development

Raises the design quality of residential flat development across the state through the application of a series of design principles. Provides for the establishment of Design Review Panels to provide independent expert advice to councils on t he merit of residential flat development. The accompanying regulation requires the involvement of a qualified designer throughout the design, approval and construction stages.

SREP No. 30 - St M arys

Sydney Regional Environmental Plan 30 - St Marys (SREP 30) provides a statutory framework to plan and develop 1538 hectares of land known as the Australian Defence Industries (ADI) site at St Marys. The plan zones the land for particular types of development: urban, regional park, regional open space, drainage, road/road widening, and employment.

SEPP (Western Sydney Employment Area) 2009

This State Environmental Planning Policy promotes economic development and the creation of employment in the Western Sydney Employment Area by providing for development, including major warehousing, distribution, freight t ransport, industrial, high technology and research facilities. The policy provides for coordinated planning, development and rezoning of land for employment or environmenta l conservation purposes.This State Environmental Planning Policy promotes economic deve lopment and the creation of employment in the Western Sydney Employment Area by providing for development, including major warehousing, distribut ion, freight transport, industrial, high technology and research facilities. The policy provides for coordinated planning, development and rezoning of land for employment or environmental conservation purposes.

SEPP (Western Sydney Parklands) 2009

The aim of the policy is to put in place planning controls that will enable the Western Sydney Parklands Trust to develop the Western Parklands into multi-use urban parkland for the region of western Sydney.

SEPP (Western Sydney Recreation Area)

This policy enab les development to be carried out for recreationa l, sporting and cultura l purposes within the Western Sydney Recreation Area, including the development of a recreation area of state significance.

General Manager

Per: (YV'/1-

End of Certificate


13/01/2017 Environment & Heritage | PRPOEO

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/SearchResult.aspx?SearchTag=all&searchrange=general&range=general 1/2

Connect Feedback

Web supportPublic consultation

Healthy Environment, Healthy Community, Healthy Business

Home > Environment protection licences > POEO Public Register >Search for licences, applications and notices

Search results Your search for: General Search with the following criteria

Suburb schofieldsreturned 48 results

Export to excel 1 of 3 Pages Search Again Number Name Location Type Status Issued date13189 CPB CONTRACTORS PTY

LIMITED Veron Road,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

POEOlicence

Surrendered20 Nov 2009

1112501 CPB CONTRACTORS PTYLIMITED

Veron Road,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

s.58 LicenceVariation

Issued 29 Mar 2010




Issued 30 Dec 2010




Issued 04 Mar 2011




Issued 17 Jun 2011




Issued 28 Jun 2011

4261 JIMMY BUTTIGIEG 101 HAMBLEDONROAD, SCHOFIELDS,NSW 2762

POEOlicence

Surrendered03 Nov 1999

2014 PGH BRICKS & PAVERSPTY LIMITED

75 TOWNSON ROAD,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

POEOlicence

Issued 13 May 2000




Issued 27 Jun 2002




Issued 22 Jun 2007




Issued 31 Aug 2007




Issued 15 Nov 2007




Issued 26 Mar 2010




Issued 12 Mar 2012

3085766860PGH BRICKS & PAVERSPTY LIMITED


PenaltyNotice

Issued 26 Nov 2012




Issued 30 Apr 2013




Issued 26 Aug 2013



PenaltyNotice

Issued 24 Nov 2014



PenaltyNotice

Issued 04 Dec 2015

1538197 PGH BRICKS & PAVERS

PTY LIMITED

75 TOWNSON ROAD,

SCHOFIELDS, NSW

s.58 Licence

Variation

Issued 19 Feb 2016

https://twitter.com/NSW_EPA

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/feedback/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/consult/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing/index.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeo/index.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=13189&id=13189&option=licence&searchrange=general&range=Licence&prp=no&status=Surrendered

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1112501&id=1112501&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=s.58%20Licence%20Variation&prp=no&status=Issued






http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=2014&id=2014&option=licence&searchrange=general&range=POEO%20licence&prp=no&status=Issued







http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1510230&id=1510230&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=Penalty%20Notice&prp=no&status=Issued







http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/SearchResult.aspx?SearchTag=all&searchrange=general&range=general 2/2

PTY LIMITED SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

Variation

123

13 January 2017


http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/SearchResult.aspx?SearchTag=all&searchrange=general&range=general&PageIndex=1 1/2

Connect Feedback






Export to excel 2 of 3 Pages Search Again NumberName Location Type Status Issued date1542863 PGH BRICKS & PAVERS

PTY LIMITED 75 TOWNSON ROAD,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762


Issued 25 Jul 2016

13078 REED CONSTRUCTIONSAUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED

VARIOUS STREETS INKELLYVILLE AND,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

POEO licence Surrendered23 Jun 2009

1005690 RIVERSTONEEARTHMOVING PTY. LTD.

127 BURFITT ROAD,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

s.91 Clean UpNotice

Issued 30 Mar 2001



POEO licence Suspended 25 Jun 2001




Issued 07 Feb 2002




Issued 14 Mar 2002




Issued 23 Dec 2003




Issued 21 Oct 2004




Issued 23 Nov 2004




Issued 11 Apr 2005




Issued 19 Jul 2005




Issued 10 Jan 2006



s.79Suspension ofa Licence

Issued 20 Apr 2006



s.96PreventionNotice

Issued 21 May 2009



s.110Variation ofPreventionNotice

Issued 29 Sep 2009



s.110Variation ofPreventionNotice

Issued 24 Mar 2010

4578 VINKO HLEBAR NORTH STREET,SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

POEO licence Issued 28 Jun 2000



Issued 08 Oct 2002

1027880 VINKO HLEBAR NORTH STREET,

SCHOFIELDS, NSW

s.58 Licence

Variation

Issued 03 Jun 2003










http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1005690&id=1005690&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=s.91%20Clean%20Up%20Notice&prp=no&status=Issued

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=4594&id=4594&option=licence&searchrange=general&range=Licence&prp=no&status=Suspended









http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1058461&id=1058461&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=s.79%20Suspension%20of%20a%20Licence&prp=no&status=Issued

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1097924&id=1097924&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=s.96%20Prevention%20Notice&prp=no&status=Issued

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1106745&id=1106745&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=s.110%20Variation%20of%20Prevention%20Notice&prp=no&status=Issued

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=1112495&id=1112495&option=notice&searchrange=general&range=s.110%20Variation%20of%20Prevention%20Notice&prp=no&status=Issued

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prpoeoapp/Detail.aspx?instid=4578&id=4578&option=licence&searchrange=general&range=POEO%20licence&prp=no&status=Issued





SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762

Variation



Issued 16 Jan 2006

123

13 January 2017




Connect Feedback






Export to excel 3 of 3 Pages Search Again Number Name Location Type Status Issued date1095234 VINKO HLEBAR NORTH STREET,

SCHOFIELDS, NSW2762


Issued 15 Jun 2009



Issued 11 Feb 2010



Issued 18 Aug 2010



Issued 17 Jun 2011



Issued 09 Nov 2011



Issued 31 Oct 2012



Issued 23 Apr 2013



Issued 02 Aug 2013

123

13 January 2017

















APPENDIX B

Site Photographs


Typical example showing site conditions at NE corner of site. Image facing SW.

Typical example showing site conditions across W portion of site. Image facing S.


Showing portion of site and southern boundary. Schofields Rd widening in background. Image facing W.

Showing clad dwelling including out-house. Historical former structure footprint location in foreground. Image facing E


Showing multiple sheds (metal and clad) and minor storage of belongings with former market gardening in foreground. Image facing N

Showing in-ground exposed concrete septic tank, brick residential dwelling (image facing W)


Showing in-ground exposed concrete septic tank, clad residential dwelling (image facing NE)

Showing asphalt access connecting to Junction Road. Image facing E


Showing site dam including geofabric and dam wall bunds.

Showing Telstra communications tower within fenced location at W site boundary.


Showing asphalt access leading to gravel access and multiple sheds

Image showing example of gravel materials containing PACM surrounding sheds


Waste Classification Assessment Stockpiled Soils, SP1; 17 Schofields Road, Schofields

8th October 2017 P30868.4_L01

ABN: 39 089 302 009

18/24 Garling Road, Kings Park NSW 2148

P (02) 9671 4443

E [email protected]

8th November 2017

Geotest Ref. P30868.4_L01

Clearstate Developments Co.

ATT: Maurice Fitzpatrick

Level 1, 79-81 Chandos Street

St Leonards NSW 2065

Re: Waste Classification Assessment; Asbestos Impacted Soils; Lot 206 in DP 1189773; 17 Schofields, Schofields NSW.

1. INTRODUCTION & HISTORY

This letter report provides the results of a soil classification assessment in accordance with the NSW EPA 2014

guidelines for classifying waste. The soils addressed within this assessment have been identified during previous

environmental investigations at the site (Geotest Services Preliminary Site Investigations, Geotest Ref.

P30868.1_R01) where these materials were identified to be impacted by asbestos containing materials (ACM) at

the surface. Geotest Services have previously prepared a Remediation Action Plan (Report Ref. P30868.1_R02,

dated February 2017) where the remediation option of off-site disposal was presented for materials grossly

impacted by ACM. Further, ACM was identified at the exposed surface following the demolition of above ground

improvements considered an unexpected find at the site.

The site is identified as 17 Schofields Road, Schofields NSW. The works are being carried out to ensure future

land use suitability. The materials have since been excavated from the various asbestos remediation areas

within the north-eastern portion of the site and deposited within a single soil stockpile of ~150m3, herein referred

to as SP1.

The site layout can be found on Figure 1 attached to this report.

2. OBJECTIVES

The objective of this report is to provide a waste classification in accordance with NSW EPA 2014.

3. SCOPE OF WORKS

The scope of works undertaken for this assessment included:

• Review of site setting and available site information;

• Visit to site;

• A visual inspection of materials;

• Collection of soil samples;



Waste Classification Assessment

Stockpiled Soils, SP1; 17 Schofields Road, Schofields 8th October 2017 P30868.4_L01

• Laboratory analysis; and

• Interpretation and reporting in accordance with the NSW EPA Waste Classification Guidelines ‘6 Steps for

Classifying Waste’ process

4. SITE INSPECTION

A visual inspection of the materials and surrounding land use at the site was carried out by an experienced Geotest environmental scientist on 27th October 2017. The following observations were made:

• The site was well fenced;

• The site had recently undergone demolition of site improvements/structures;

• Upon inspection, various fragments of ACM and further a generally elevated concentration of inert and non-hazardous materials were identified at the surface of the inspection area;

• The surface soils were considered aesthetically unsuitable for re-use at the site and the asbestos materials were considered to present an unsuitable health risk for future land users (human health);

• There was no evidence of chemical storage, process residues or industrial, mining, commercial or agricultural activities within the immediate proximity of the stockpile;

• The site is situated within an area where acid sulphate soils are not known or expected to occur, including in surrounding areas (<500m).

5. NSW EPA WASTE CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 2014 STEPS

The NSW EPA 2014 Waste Classification Guidelines, Part 1; Classify Waste (NSW EPA 2014) provides guidance on the classification of wastes for disposal in NSW. The following 6 steps should be considered: Step 1: Is the waste Special Waste? Yes, Asbestos however contains primarily soil materials not yet classified. Step 2: Is the Waste Liquid Waste? No Step 3: Is the Waste Pre-Classified? No. The waste was not considered to be applicable to any listed exemption orders Step 4: Does the Waste Possess Hazardous Characteristics? No, the waste is not observed to contain hazardous including Class 1 – Class 8 dangerous goods Step 5: Determining a Wastes Classification Using Chemical Assessment. Yes, the waste should be chemically assessed to determine its relevant classification Step 6: Is the waste putrescible or non-putrescible? The waste primarily consists of soil materials which are non-putrescible

6. SOIL SAMPLING

Soil sampling was conducted on 27th October 2017 by an experienced Geotest environmental consultant. Sampling

was undertaken in accordance with Geotest procedures which are based on industry accepted practice. A total of

7 environmental samples were collected from the in-situ materials prior to excavation to stockpile. Samples were

collected from test pits conducted using a 5 tonnes excavator, soil samples were collected from unbroken soil

using a clean pair of nitrile gloves for each sample. This industry acceptable method removes the need for re-

usable tool and eliminates the potential for cross contamination.

The material recovered consisted of a mixture of silty and sandy clays, brown in colour and including foreign

materials such as observed brick and concrete rubble, fragments of plastic, timber and steel and visual presence

of ACM. The soil samples were placed into laboratory prepared glass jars using a clean pair of nitrile gloves and a

representative fragment of ACM was placed into a double zipped bag. The sample identification and description is

presented below:

• TP1 0.1-0.2 Silty sandy CLAY, brown, with elevated concentrations of foreign materials including ACM









• PACM1 Silty sandy CLAY, brown, with elevated concentrations of foreign materials including ACM

All representative samples were transported to the NATA accredited analytical laboratory with the Chain of Custody

(COC) form, recording the following information:

• project reference;

• date of sampling;

• sample identification;

• matrix and container details

• preservation method;

• name of sampler;

• required analysis;

• turnaround times required; and

• signatures of sender and receiving laboratory.

A copy of the COC was kept in the project file. Samples were transported to the laboratory with sufficient time to

perform analysis within the applicable holding period. Laboratory analysis was scheduled on representative

samples for one, or a combination of the following contaminants of potential concern:

• Metals (8) (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn);

• Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs);

• Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons (TRHs);

• Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene and Xylene (BTEX);

• Organchlorinated Pesticides (OCP);

• Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB); and

• Asbestos Identification.

Laboratory analysis was carried out by Eurofins MGT Lane Cove, which is NATA accredited for the methods used.

The laboratory reports Eurofins Ref. # 570293-S and 570293-AID were generated. The corresponding laboratory

certificates of analysis have been attached to the end of this report for reference.

7. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL (QAQC)

Field data quality was assessed. The results of this assessment showed that:

• Fieldwork was undertaken in accordance with Geotest procedures, which are based on industry accepted

practices.

Laboratory data quality was assessed. The results of this assessment showed that:

• Samples were extracted and analysed within appropriate holding times;

• The laboratory QAQC protocols were considered satisfactory.

The results of this assessment showed that Eurofins MGT Lane Cove is accredited by NATA for chemical testing

services. Eurofins has a quality system compliant to ISO/IEC 17025 and work to documented procedures in

accordance with this standard. This includes but is not limited to participation in proficiency testing, use of certified

reference materials and statistical analysis of quality control data.




The QA/QC assessment indicates the data is suitable for the purpose of this assessment.

8. RESULTS & DISCUSSION

The following summary table of results was prepared:

Analyte

Column 1, Table 1, EPA 20141



Reported Maximum Concentrations

CT1 TCLP1 SCC1 Eurofins (#570293-S &

570293-AID)

All units are mg/kg unless otherwise reported.

Arsenic 100 - - 21

Cadmium 20 - - <0.4

Chromium (VI) 100 - - 23

Lead 100 - - 44

Mercury 4 - - <0.1

Nickel 40 - - 28

Total PAHs 200 - - <0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.8 - - <0.5

Benzene 10 - - <0.1

Toluene 288 - - <0.1

Ethyl-benzene 600 - - <0.1

Xylenes (Total) 1,000 - - <0.3

PCBs <50 - - <0.5

Scheduled Chems2 <50 - - <502

TRH C6-C9 650 - - <20

TRH C10-C36 10,000 - - 52

Asbestos Identification

Detect - - Detected

1Maximum [allowable] values / concentrations 2Maximum concentration is based on inferred CoPC and scheduled chemicals analysed

Results from the representative fragment of ACM described as compressed fibre cement building material

analysed for the presence of asbestos ‘PACM1’ reported a positive detection for asbestos within the sample. Soil

samples analysed for the presence of asbestos reported no respirable fibred detected at the laboratory limit of

reporting.

The results of the laboratory analysis report Ref # 570293-S prepared by NATA accredited laboratory Eurofins,

Lane Cove indicated that the samples reported concentrations of analytes less than the NSW EPA 2014 Waste

Classification Guidelines Table 1, Column CT1 thresholds for General Solid Waste.




9. WASTE CLASSIFICATION

The results of the waste classification for the nominated stockpiled soils ‘SP1’ at 17 Schofields Road, Schofields

development site, when compared against NSW EPA 2014, Part 1: Classifying waste including Table 1 Column 1

for CT1 indicate that the materials suitably qualify for classification as General Solid Waste. The positive

identification of asbestos within the representative compressed fibre cement fragment indicates the waste must be

managed as waste containing asbestos.

Waste Classification: General Solid Waste containing Asbestos (GSW-A).

The waste should be lawfully disposed of to an approved facility licensed to accept this type of waste.

This report should be read in conjunction with its limitations presented in Section 10.




10. LIMITATIONS Geotest Services Pty Ltd works at the site is based on a specific scope of investigation and upon the program of

surface and/or subsurface screening and/or laboratory testing of samples. The findings of this report are based on

site conditions existing at the time of the inspection. On this basis, Geotest Services Pty Ltd cannot provide

unqualified warranties or assume liability for site conditions not observed and/or not accessible during the time of

its investigation. Despite all reasonable care and diligence, the conditions encountered and concentrations of

contaminants measured may not be representative of conditions between the locations sampled and investigated.

On this basis, conclusions have been made from a limited number of observation points assuming that the

geological and chemical conditions are representative. No other warranties are made or intended.

This report and associated document has been prepared solely for the use of Geotest, the engaging client and

interested parties for the purpose of transport and disposal of materials. Any reliance assumed by third parties on

this report shall be at such parties own risk. Any ensuring liability resulting from use of the report by third parties

cannot be transferred to Geotest Services Pty Ltd.

Section 143 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO) states that it is an offence for waste

to be transported to a place that cannot lawfully be used as a facility to accept that waste. It is the duty of the owner

and transporters of the waste to ensure that the waste is disposed appropriately and the site can accept the waste.

Geotest Services Pty Ltd does not accept responsibility for material tracking, loading, transport or disposal of waste

from the site.

Prior arrangement with the receiving waste facility or relevant authority should be obtained prior to the disposal or

reuse of any material offsite. The receiving site should check the materials received to ensure that the imported

materials match the description provided in this report.

11. CLOSING

Geotest trusts this report is satisfactory to your needs. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

For and on behalf of Geotest Services Pty Ltd.

Alan Halpin

Environmental Operations Manager

Attachments

1. Figure 1 showing site locality 2. Figure 2 site layout 3. Site photographs 4. Eurofins, Laboratory Certificates of Analysis # 570293-S and 570293-AID 5. Existing environmental reports (Geotest RAP, PSI)




1. FIGURE 1; SITE LOCALITY

Image source: SIXMap 2017 Site indicated within yellow highlight and red boundary




1. FIGURE 2; SITE LAYOUT

Image source: NearMap 2017, extracted from Geotest RAP (Edited by A.H, 2/11/2017)




3. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS




Image showing surface of excavation area during assessment (ACM impacts) prior to excavation to stockpile for disposal

Another image showing surface of excavation area during assessment (ACM impacts) prior to excavation to stockpile for disposal




Typical example showing soil materials encountered during assessment. Materials since excavated and stockpiled on-site for off-site dipsosal.




4. LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS


Geotest Services


Kings Park

NSW 2148


Report 570293-S

Project name 17 SCHOFIELDS RD

Project ID P30868.4

Received Date Oct 31, 2017

Client Sample ID TP1 0.1-0.2M TP2 0.1-0.2M TP3 0.0-0.1M TP5 0.0-0.1M






TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg - < 20 - < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg - < 20 - < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg - < 50 - < 50

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg - 52 - < 50

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg - 52 - < 50

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - < 0.2

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg - < 0.3 - < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - 55 - 61


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg - < 20 - < 20

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg - < 20 - < 20

TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg - < 50 - < 50

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg - < 50 - < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg - < 100 - < 100

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg - < 100 - < 100


Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 0.6 - 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 1.2 - 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of 15










Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - 88 - 96

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - 90 - 101


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 - < 0.1 -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - < 1 -

Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 -

Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 - < 0.1 -

Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 - < 0.1 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 111 - 90 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 88 - 84 -


Aroclor-1016 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1232 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1242 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1248 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1254 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1260 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Total PCB* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - < 0.5 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 111 - 90 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 88 - 84 -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of 15







Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 21 17 13 16

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4


Copper 5 mg/kg 46 27 25 23

Lead 5 mg/kg 44 44 32 29

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 28 12 12 12

Zinc 5 mg/kg 230 170 150 110

% Moisture 1 % 18 17 15 16

Client Sample ID TP6 0.0-0.1M TP10 0.1-0.2M

Sample Matrix Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-Oc35312 S17-Oc35313

Date Sampled Oct 27, 2017 Oct 27, 2017



TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg - < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg - < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg - < 50

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg - < 50

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg - < 50

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg - < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - 61


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg - < 20

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg - < 20

TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg - < 50

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg - < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg - < 100

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg - < 100


Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of 15








Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - 78

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - 84


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 -

Aldrin and Dieldrin (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

DDT + DDE + DDD (Total)* 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 -

Vic EPA IWRG 621 OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 -

Vic EPA IWRG 621 Other OCP (Total)* 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 61 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 58 -


Aroclor-1016 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1221 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 -

Aroclor-1232 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1242 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1248 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1254 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -

Aroclor-1260 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of 15








Total PCB* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 61 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 58 -

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 11 14

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 18 19

Copper 5 mg/kg 18 27

Lead 5 mg/kg 24 23

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 15 8.7

Zinc 5 mg/kg 72 36

% Moisture 1 % 13 16



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of 15







BTEX Sydney Nov 01, 2017 14 Day






Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sydney Nov 01, 2017 14 Days

- Method: LTM-ORG-2130 PAH and Phenols in Soils by GCMS





Polychlorinated Biphenyls Sydney Nov 01, 2017 28 Days






ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of 15






Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964

Asbestos A

bsence /Presence

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

13

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7


Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X



External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID

1 TP1 0.1-0.2M Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35308 X X X X

2 TP2 0.1-0.2M Oct 27, 2017 Soil S17-Oc35309 X X





7 PACM Oct 27, 2017 Other S17-Oc35314 X

Test Counts 3 1 3 3 6 3








ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 7 of 15



General

Holding Times

Units

Terms




request.










Receipt Advice.

































affected.

















ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 8 of 15




PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank






Method Blank

BTEX

Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass

Method Blank




TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass

TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass


Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank



4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass










ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 9 of 15



PassLimits

QualifyingCode











Method Blank









Total PCB* mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals









LCS - % Recovery


TRH C6-C9 % 77 70-130 Pass

TRH C10-C14 % 77 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

BTEX

Benzene % 75 70-130 Pass

Toluene % 77 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene % 77 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes % 81 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene % 76 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total % 79 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery



TRH C6-C10 % 77 70-130 Pass

TRH >C10-C16 % 79 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Acenaphthene % 102 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene % 101 70-130 Pass

Anthracene % 116 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene % 98 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene % 102 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 10 of 15



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 99 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 93 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 100 70-130 Pass

Chrysene % 100 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 107 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene % 102 70-130 Pass

Fluorene % 109 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 97 70-130 Pass


Phenanthrene % 109 70-130 Pass

Pyrene % 103 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


4.4'-DDD % 124 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE % 122 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT % 126 70-130 Pass

a-BHC % 122 70-130 Pass


b-BHC % 115 70-130 Pass

d-BHC % 114 70-130 Pass













LCS - % Recovery


Aroclor-1260 % 104 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals





Lead % 98 70-130 Pass



Zinc % 97 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery


4.4'-DDD S17-Oc35110 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-Oc34674 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-No02930 NCP % 114 70-130 Pass

a-BHC S17-Oc34674 NCP % 106 70-130 Pass

Aldrin S17-Oc34674 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass

b-BHC S17-Oc34674 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 11 of 15



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

d-BHC S17-Oc34674 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin S17-Oc34674 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I S17-Oc34674 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II S17-Oc34674 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-Oc34674 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Endrin S17-Oc34674 NCP % 111 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-Oc34674 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone S17-Oc34674 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-Oc34674 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor S17-Oc34674 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-Oc34674 NCP % 105 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-Oc34674 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass


Toxaphene S17-Oc35069 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1

Aroclor-1260 S17-Oc34674 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Zinc S17-Oc35073 NCP % 78 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH C6-C9 S17-Oc34673 NCP % 71 70-130 Pass


Spike - % Recovery

BTEX Result 1

Benzene S17-Oc34673 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

Toluene S17-Oc34673 NCP % 72 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene S17-Oc34673 NCP % 76 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes S17-Oc34673 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene S17-Oc34673 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total S17-Oc34673 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Naphthalene S17-Oc34673 NCP % 79 70-130 Pass


TRH >C10-C16 S17-Oc34921 NCP % 74 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1

Acenaphthene S17-No01100 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene S17-No01100 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass

Anthracene S17-No01100 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene S17-No01100 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene S17-No01100 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene S17-No01100 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene S17-No01100 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene S17-No01100 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

Chrysene S17-No01100 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene S17-No01100 NCP % 104 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene S17-No01100 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass

Fluorene S17-No01100 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene S17-No01100 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene S17-No01100 NCP % 84 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene S17-No01100 NCP % 94 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 12 of 15



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Pyrene S17-No01100 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Arsenic S17-Oc35312 CP % 85 70-130 Pass

Cadmium S17-Oc35312 CP % 88 70-130 Pass

Chromium S17-Oc35312 CP % 71 70-130 Pass

Copper S17-Oc35312 CP % 74 70-130 Pass

Lead S17-Oc35312 CP % 80 70-130 Pass

Mercury S17-Oc35312 CP % 90 70-130 Pass

Nickel S17-Oc35312 CP % 75 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate


Chlordanes - Total S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDD S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

a-BHC S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Aldrin S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

b-BHC S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

d-BHC S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Dieldrin S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan I S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan II S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin ketone S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Methoxychlor S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Toxaphene S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Polychlorinated Biphenyls Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Aroclor-1016 S17-Oc34673 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass







Duplicate


Arsenic S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg 3.3 18 30% Pass

Cadmium S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 11 30% Pass

Chromium S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg 25 11 30% Pass

Copper S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg 22 1.0 30% Pass

Lead S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg 9.6 17 30% Pass

Mercury S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 6.0 30% Pass

Nickel S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg 25 7.0 30% Pass

Zinc S17-Oc34743 NCP mg/kg 50 6.0 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 13 of 15


Duplicate


TRH C6-C9 S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass




Duplicate

BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Benzene S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg 0.2 0.3 15 30% Pass

Toluene S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg 0.3 0.4 24 30% Pass

Ethylbenzene S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

m&p-Xylenes S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

o-Xylene S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Xylenes - Total S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Naphthalene S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg 1.5 2.0 29 30% Pass


TRH >C10-C16 S17-Oc35247 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass



Duplicate

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Acenaphthene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene S17-No01099 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


% Moisture S17-Oc35311 CP % 16 15 2.0 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 14 of 15


Comments








Comments


Code Description

N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).

N02

Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.

N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.

N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs

Authorised By



Glenn Jackson







ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 15 of 15


https://d1jj3zdoktl3jd.cloudfront.net/apac/media/489918/reporting-measurement-uncertainty-of-chemical-and-microbiology-test-results-september-2017.pdf



Attention: Dave Spasojevic-All ResultsReport 570293-AIDProject Name 17 SCHOFIELDS RDProject ID P30868.4Received Date Oct 31, 2017Date Reported Nov 03, 2017












ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of


6

NATA Accredited


Site Number 18217


Project Name 17 SCHOFIELDS RDProject ID P30868.4Date Sampled Oct 27, 2017Report 570293-AID


TP1 0.1-0.2M 17-Oc35308 Oct 27, 2017 Approximate Sample 63gSample consisted of: Brown coarse grain soil









PACM 17-Oc35314 Oct 27, 2017 Approximate Sample 14g / 90x45x5mmSample consisted of: Brown compressed fibre cement material

Chrysotile asbestos detected.

Organic fibre detected.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of


6

NATA Accredited


Site Number 18217









ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of


6

V2






Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Oct 31, 2017 4:30 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 570293 Due: Nov 3, 2017




Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964

Asbestos A

bsence /Presence

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

13

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID







7 PACM Oct 27, 2017 BuildingMaterials

S17-Oc35314 X




ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of


6








Receipt Advice.






Flowrate: L/min














for fibre release.












ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of


6

Comments

The samples received were not collected in an approved asbestos bag and was therefore sub-sampled from the 250mL glass jar. Valid sub-sampling procedures were applied so as to ensure that the sub-samples to be analysed accurately represented the samples received.








Comments




Sayeed Abu Senior Analyst-Asbestos (NSW)

Authorised by:


Glenn Jackson







ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of


6













Project name: 17 SCHOFIELDS RD

Project ID: P30868.4



Date/Time received: Oct 31, 2017 4:30 PM








☒ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.
















Sample Detail

Asbestos - A

S4964

Asbestos A

bsence /Presence

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

13

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





External Laboratory


Matrix LAB ID







7 PACM Oct 27, 2017 Other S17-Oc35314 X










5. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS

Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 1 · Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 2 Geotest Cover Letter (CL) Former 17-19...

Documents

Transcript of Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 1 · Geotest Services Pty Ltd. 2 Geotest Cover Letter (CL) Former 17-19...