GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - BLN Plan Room

59
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION CR N 500 E FROM CR E 600 N TO CR E 700 N NEWTON COUNTY, INDIANA CTL PROJECT NO.: 19050128IND PREPARED FOR: BEAM, LONGEST AND NEFF, LLC 8320 CRAIG STREET INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46250 PREPARED BY: CTL ENGINEERING, INC. 1310 S. FRANKLIN ROAD INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46239 JANUARY 27, 2020

Transcript of GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION - BLN Plan Room

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION CR N 500 E FROM CR E 600 N TO CR E 700 N

NEWTON COUNTY, INDIANA CTL PROJECT NO.: 19050128IND

PREPARED FOR:

BEAM, LONGEST AND NEFF, LLC 8320 CRAIG STREET

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46250

PREPARED BY:

CTL ENGINEERING, INC. 1310 S. FRANKLIN ROAD

INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46239

JANUARY 27, 2020

CTL Engineering, Inc. 1310 S. Franklin Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46239 Phone: (317) 295-8650 • Fax: (317) 295-8395 www.ctleng.com Consulting Engineers – Testing – Inspection Services – Analytical

Offices: Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, India

January 27, 2020 Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC 8320 Craig Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46250 Attention: Mr. Scott Wilkinson, PE

Mr. Vance Epple, PE

Reference: Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700 N Newton County, Indiana

CTL Project No.: 19050128IND Dear Mr. Wilkinson: In accordance with your authorization to proceed, CTL Engineering, Inc. has completed the geotechnical investigation on the above referenced site. The report includes the results of the field and laboratory testing, and recommendation for the proposed roadway reconstruction. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact us at (317) 295-8650. Sincerely, CTL ENGINEERING, INC. Ali Karaki, PE Principal Engineer

This summary is provided for general information only, and it should not be used as the only source for any design, estimating or bidding. Detailed recommendations are provided in the geotechnical report. The report should be used in its entirety.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Roadway Reconstruction

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700 N Newton County, Indiana

Project Description: The project involves reconstruction of CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700 N, and CR 700 N from approximately 415 feet west of CR 500 N to approximately 885 feet east of CR 500 N in Newton County, Indiana. The existing gravel roadways are approximately 24 feet wide with earthen shoulders. The proposed improvement consists of converting the existing gravel road to an HMA roadway with one 11-foot wide lane in each direction bordered by 2 foot wide paved and 2 foot wide aggregate shoulders. Subsurface Conditions: The test borings exhibited a surface cover consisting of 4 to 8 inches of gravel, averaging approximately 5 inches in thickness. Below the surface cover, the test borings encountered soils classified as sand of A-2-4 soil category. Samples collected from the upper the existing surficial soils (topsoil) exhibited the results summarized in Table 1 of the geotechnical report. Dark gray to black colored sand soils were encountered in all the test borings at depths ranging from 1.2 to 4.5 feet below the existing grade. Loss on ignition test performed on selected samples of this sand exhibited values ranging from 2.7 to 4.0 percent. Natural moisture content values of these foundation soils ranged from 4 to 17 percent. The pH values of the subgrade soils ranged from 7.0 to 7.6 percent. Detailed information of soil type and standard penetration values are shown in Appendices B and C and summarized in Table 2 of the geotechnical report. Pavement Considerations: The proposed HMA pavement may be designed using the soil parameters provided below in Table 4. The recommended subgrade treatment should be performed in accordance with INDOT Standard Specifications Section 207. The foundation soils should be proofrolled following INDOT Standard Specification (ISS) 203.26. Soft or wet soils not meeting the proofrolling shall be undercut up to 18 inches below the bottom of the subgrade elevation and replaced with approved material in accordance with ISS 214.03 (b). A geotextile 918.02 (c) Type 2A shall be placed at the bottom of the excavation, if needed. The subgrade treatment shall then be constructed on top of the foundation improvement. It is expected that soil improvement may be required in the widening areas. It is estimated that 15 percent of the total paved area may require foundation improvement. This estimated may fluctuate depending upon the time of construction and fluctuation in rainfall. Foundation improvement will be at the discretion of the Engineer.

Geotechnical Investigation – Executive Summary Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 2

This summary is provided for general information only, and it should not be used as the only source for any design, estimating or bidding. Detailed recommendations are provided in the geotechnical report. The report should be used in its entirety.

Table A – Soil Parameters for Pavement Design

Resilient Modulus (MR) of Prepared Subgrade 9,000 Resilient Modulus (MR) of Natural Subgrade 3,000 Predominant Soil Type Sand (A-2-4) Percent Passing #200 14.3 % Silt 11.2 LL NP PL NP PI NP Depth to Water Table > 2.8 feet below existing grade Natural Density (pcf) of Natural Subgrade 115 % Moisture of Natural Subgrade 12 Organic Content (1)

Marl Content (1) Sulfate Content (ppm) 120 Rock Depth > 15 feet below existing grade Filter Fabric Required for Underdrains 918.02(b) Type 1B (NW) (2)

Subgrade Treatment Type IC or Type IB cement only

(1) Loss on Ignition test indicated 2.7% to 4.0% organic matter and 0.6% to 1.3% calcium carbonate on the upper gray/black colored sand layer.

(2) Underdrain trench < 3 ft. deep.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

I. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ............................................................. 1 II. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ................................................................................ 1 III. FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................... 2

A. Subsurface Conditions ................................................................................................ 2

B. Groundwater ............................................................................................................... 2

IV. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................... 6 A. Pavement Considerations ........................................................................................... 6

B. General Site Preparation and Earthwork ................................................................ 7

V. CONCLUDING REMARKS ........................................................................................... 8

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 – Topsoil Test Results ..................................................................................................... 3 Table 2 – Summary of Foundation Soil Testing ......................................................................... 3 Table 3 – Groundwater Readings ................................................................................................ 5 Table 4 – Soil Parameters for Pavement Design ........................................................................ 6

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A BORING LOCATION PLANS APPENDIX B TEST BORING RECORDS APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING APPENDIX D SOIL PROFILES

Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 1

I. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The project involves reconstruction of CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700 N, and CR 700 N from approximately 415 feet west of CR 500 N to approximately 885 feet east of CR 500 N in Newton County, Indiana. The existing gravel roadways are approximately 24 feet wide with earthen shoulders. The proposed improvement consists of converting the existing gravel road to an HMA roadway with one 11-foot wide lane in each direction bordered by 2 foot wide paved and 2 foot wide aggregate shoulders. The roadway improvement on CR 500 E begins at Station 100+09.76 and ends at Station 153+48.48 Line “500 East”, for a total length of 5,338.72 feet. The roadway improvement on CR 700 N begins at Station 21+70 and ends at Station 34+10 Line “700 North”, for a total length of 1,240.00 feet. The proposed HMA roadway will be constructed at or near the existing grade with approximately 1-foot of fill in the widening areas. Additionally, end sections will be installed for Structure No. 12 the pipe culvert at Station 122+72 “500 East”.

II. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

Fifteen (15) roadway test borings, designated as RB-1 through RB-15, were drilled to a depth of 10.0 feet each below the existing grade. Test Borings RB-1 through RB-12 were drilled on CR N 500 E while RB-13, RB-14 and RB-15 were drilled on CR E 700 N. Additionally, one (1) test boring, designated as TB-1 was drilled to a depth of 15 feet on CR N 500 E in the vicinity of the small culvert. The test borings were advanced with an ATV mounted drilling rig utilizing hollow stem augers (HSA) between December 30th, 2019 and January 8th, 2020. Standard Penetration tests were conducted using 140-pound automatic hammers falling 30 inches to drive a 2-inch O.D. split barrel sampler for 18 inches. Soil samples obtained from the drilling operation were preserved in glass jars and visually classified in the field by the drilling crew and in the laboratory by a geotechnical engineer, and tested for Natural Moisture Content. Representative soil samples were tested for Atterberg Limits, Grain Size Distribution, pH, Loss on Ignition and Calcium Carbonate.

Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 2

Drilling, soil sampling and laboratory testing were performed following standard geotechnical engineering practices, INDOT and current AASHTO/ASTM procedures. Results from field tests are shown on the enclosed Test Boring Records in Appendix B and laboratory test sheets in Appendix C.

Station and offset of the test borings were estimated using the plans prepared by BLN dated 12/13/2019. The points were plotted in Google Earth to estimate Latitude and Longitude and then located using a Trimble Geo7X GPS system. Surface elevation of the test borings were estimated from plans and profiles prepared by BLN. Boring locations and elevation shown on the Boring Location Plans in Appendix A and Test Boring Records in Appendix B should be considered approximate.

III. FINDINGS

A. Subsurface Conditions

The test borings exhibited a surface cover consisting of 4 to 8 inches of gravel, averaging approximately 5 inches in thickness. Below the surface cover, the test borings encountered soils classified as sand of A-2-4 soil category. Samples collected from the upper the existing surficial soils (topsoil) exhibited the results summarized below in Table 1. Laboratory test results are included in Appendix C. Dark gray to black colored sand soils were encountered in all the test borings at depths ranging from 1.2 to 4.5 feet below the existing grade. Loss on ignition test performed on selected samples of this sand exhibited values ranging from 2.7 to 4.0 percent. Natural moisture content values of these foundation soils ranged from 4 to 17 percent. The pH values of the subgrade soils ranged from 7.0 to 7.6 percent. Detailed information of soil types and standard penetration values are shown in the Test Boring Records in Appendix B, laboratory test results in Appendix C and summarized below in Table 2.

B. Groundwater

Groundwater was encountered in the test borings as shown on the attached Test Boring Records in Appendix B. A summary of groundwater measurements and cave-in depths is provided in Table 3. It should be noted that fluctuations in groundwater levels should be expected over time due to variations in precipitation.

Geo

tech

nica

l Inv

estig

atio

n

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion,

CR

N 5

00 E

in N

ewto

n C

ount

y, IN

C

TL P

roje

ct N

o.: 1

9050

128I

ND

Ja

nuar

y 27

, 202

0

Page

3

T

able

1 –

Top

soil

Tes

t Res

ults

*

Des

. St

atio

n O

ffset

Li

ne

Test

ed

Dep

th

(inch

) pH

G

rave

l Sa

nd

Silt

Cla

y O

rgan

ic C

onte

nt

(% b

y W

eigh

t) Ph

osph

orus

(p

pm)

Pota

ssiu

m

(p

pm)

(% b

y W

eigh

t)

TS-1

10

0+18

16

’ Rt

'500

Eas

t' 2

7.0

1 81

16

2

3.4

83

103

TS-2

12

2+85

15

’ Lt

'500

Eas

t' 2

7.5

4 80

10

6

2.5

47

48

TS-3

15

3+32

15

’ Rt

'500

Eas

t' 2

7.1

25

64

9 3

2.9

82

56

TS-4

22

+00

8’ L

t '7

00 N

orth

' 2

6.7

28

59

12

1 3.

0 30

68

*

All e

xist

ing

tops

oil t

est r

esul

ts p

rese

nted

her

ein

are

for i

nfor

mat

ion

only

.

Tab

le 2

– S

umm

ary

of F

ound

atio

n So

il T

estin

g

Borin

g N

o.

Stat

ion

(feet

) O

ffset

Li

ne

Lab

No.

C

lass

ifica

tion

AA

SHTO

G

roup

In

dex

LL

PL

PI

%

Pass

ing

#200

%

Silt

%

Cla

y %

M

oist

ure

RB-

1

100+

18

16' L

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

9.0

RB-

2

105+

00

10' R

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

13.8

R

B- 3

11

0+00

10

' Lt

500

East

La

b 1

Sand

A

-2-4

N

P N

P N

P 13

.9

10.4

3.

5 11

.4

RB-

4

115+

25

9' R

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

4 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

17.0

16

.1

0.9

16.7

R

B- 5

12

0+00

10

' Lt

500

East

La

b 1

Sand

A

-2-4

N

P N

P N

P 13

.9

10.4

3.

5 13

.6

RB-

6

125+

00

9' R

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

13.3

R

B- 7

13

0+00

9'

Lt

500

East

La

b 1

Sand

A

-2-4

N

P N

P N

P 13

.9

10.4

3.

5 11

.7

RB-

8

135+

00

9' R

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

11.9

R

B- 9

14

0+00

10

' Lt

500

East

La

b 1

Sand

A

-2-4

N

P N

P N

P 13

.9

10.4

3.

5 16

.3

Geo

tech

nica

l Inv

estig

atio

n

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion,

CR

N 5

00 E

in N

ewto

n C

ount

y, IN

C

TL P

roje

ct N

o.: 1

9050

128I

ND

Ja

nuar

y 27

, 202

0

Page

4

Tab

le 2

– S

umm

ary

of F

ound

atio

n So

il T

estin

g

Borin

g N

o.

Stat

ion

(feet

) O

ffset

Li

ne

Lab

No.

C

lass

ifica

tion

AA

SHTO

G

roup

In

dex

LL

PL

PI

%

Pass

ing

#200

%

Silt

%

Cla

y %

M

oist

ure

RB-

10

145+

35

12' R

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

9.9

RB-

11

150+

00

9' L

t 50

0 Ea

st

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

17.1

R

B-12

15

3+32

15

' Rt

500

East

La

b 1

Sand

A

-2-4

N

P N

P N

P 13

.9

10.4

3.

5 15

.4

RB-

13

22+0

0 8'

Lt

700

Nor

th

Lab

1 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

13.9

10

.4

3.5

9.2

RB-

14

29+0

0 8'

Lt

700

Nor

th

Lab

5 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

15.5

13

.7

1.8

6.9

RB-

15

34+0

0 9'

Rt

700

Nor

th

Lab

5 Sa

nd

A-2

-4

NP

NP

NP

15.5

13

.7

1.8

3.8

TB- 1

12

2+85

15

' Lt

500

East

La

b 6

Sand

A

-2-4

N

P N

P N

P 13

.2

11.6

1.

6 5.

7 A

vera

ge

NP

NP

NP

14.3

11

.2

3.0

11.6

M

inim

um

NP

NP

NP

13.2

10

.4

0.9

3.8

Max

imum

N

P N

P N

P 17

.0

16.1

3.

5 17

.1

Stan

dard

Dev

iatio

n

NP

NP

NP

0.9

1.7

0.9

4.0

Geo

tech

nica

l Inv

estig

atio

n

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion,

CR

N 5

00 E

in N

ewto

n C

ount

y, IN

C

TL P

roje

ct N

o.: 1

9050

128I

ND

Ja

nuar

y 27

, 202

0

Page

5

T

able

3 –

Gro

undw

ater

Rea

ding

s

Borin

g N

o.

Dat

e D

rille

d W

eath

er

Gro

undw

ater

Rea

ding

s (fe

et)

Cav

e-in

Dep

th

(feet

) D

urin

g D

rillin

g A

t Com

plet

ion

Del

ayed

R

B- 1

1/

7/20

20

Ove

rcas

t 6.

0 4.

7 4.

5 @

24

Hrs

. 4.

7 R

B- 2

12

/30/

2019

O

verc

ast

3.6

2.9

2.8

@ 2

4 H

rs.

3.6

RB-

3

12/3

0/20

19

Ove

rcas

t 3.

6 2.

7 2.

7 @

24

Hrs

. 4.

1 R

B- 4

12

/30/

2019

O

verc

ast

5.0

Dry

D

ry @

24

Hrs

. 4.

1 R

B- 5

12

/30/

2019

O

verc

ast

5.0

3.6

3.6

@ 2

4 H

rs.

3.7

RB-

6

1/7/

2020

Su

nny

3.6

3.6

2.8

@ 2

4 H

rs.

3.6

RB-

7

1/7/

2020

Su

nny

4.0

3.1

3.8

@ 2

4 H

rs.

3.9

RB-

8

1/7/

2020

Su

nny

5.0

4.1

4.8

@ 2

4 H

rs.

4.9

RB-

9

1/7/

2020

Su

nny

6.0

6.3

6.3

@ 2

4 H

rs.

6.5

RB-

10

1/7/

2020

O

verc

ast

5.0

4.5

4.4

@ 2

4 H

rs.

4.6

RB-

11

1/8/

2020

Su

nny

4.6

Dry

D

ry @

5 H

rs.

4.4

RB-

12

1/8/

2020

Su

nny

6.6

Dry

D

ry @

4 H

rs.

5.0

RB-

13

1/8/

2020

Su

nny

6.0

Dry

D

ry @

3 H

rs.

4.5

RB-

14

1/8/

2020

Su

nny

6.6

6.7

6.6

@ 2

Hrs

. 6.

7 R

B-15

1/

8/20

20

Sunn

y 9.

0 D

ry

Dry

@ 1

Hr.

7.3

TB- 1

1/

7/20

20

Sunn

y 4.

6 3.

4 2.

8 @

24

Hrs

. 3.

6

Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 6

IV. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A. Pavement Considerations

The proposed HMA pavement may be designed using the soil parameters provided below in Table 4. The recommended subgrade treatment should be performed in accordance with INDOT Standard Specifications Section 207.

Table 4 – Soil Parameters for Pavement Design

Resilient Modulus (MR) of Prepared Subgrade 9,000 Resilient Modulus (MR) of Natural Subgrade 3,000 Predominant Soil Type Sand (A-2-4) Percent Passing #200 14.3 % Silt 11.2 LL NP PL NP PI NP Depth to Water Table > 2.8 feet below existing grade Natural Density (pcf) of Natural Subgrade 115 % Moisture of Natural Subgrade 12 Organic Content (1)

Marl Content (1) Sulfate Content (ppm) 120 Rock Depth > 15 feet below existing grade Filter Fabric Required for Underdrains 918.02(b) Type 1B (NW) (2)

Subgrade Treatment Type IC or Type IB cement only

(1) Loss on Ignition test indicated 2.7% to 4.0% organic matter and 0.6% to 1.3% calcium carbonate on the upper gray/black colored sand layer.

(2) Underdrain trench < 3 ft. deep.

Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 7

The foundation soils should be proofrolled following INDOT Standard Specification (ISS) 203.26. Soft or wet soils not meeting the proofrolling shall be undercut up to 18 inches below the bottom of the subgrade elevation and replaced with approved material in accordance with ISS 214.03 (b). A geotextile 918.02 (c) Type 2A shall be placed at the bottom of the excavation, if needed. The subgrade treatment shall then be constructed on top of the foundation improvement. It is expected that soil improvement may be required in the widening areas. It is estimated that 15 percent of the total paved area may require foundation improvement. This estimated may fluctuate depending upon the time of construction and fluctuation in rainfall. Foundation improvement will be at the discretion of the Engineer.

B. General Site Preparation and Earthwork

The following general site preparation and earthwork recommendations are provided for localized pavement patching where applicable.

a. All surface objects, pavement, grass, vegetation, surficial soils and roots,

located within the construction limits, shall be cleared and grubbed in accordance with ISS Section 201.

b. During earthwork operations, care should be taken to provide adequate

drainage on the exposed soils. Ditches and/or catch basins must be kept open at all times, and the subgrade should be graded at the end of each day, to facilitate good drainage.

c. Borrow material needed in fill areas should be in accordance with ISS Section 211. Surficial soil and/or organically contaminated materials are not acceptable for use as backfill.

d. The backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with ISS Section 203. The engineered fill should not be placed in a frozen condition or over a frozen subgrade.

e. All subgrade soils and pavement materials should conform to the latest issue of INDOT Standard Specifications.

Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 8

V. CONCLUDING REMARKS

The evaluations, conclusions, and recommendations in this report are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data obtained during the exploration, information available at the time of this report, our understanding of the project scope at the time of the report and our experience with similar sites and subsurface conditions using generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. Although individual test borings are representative of the subsurface conditions at the boring locations on the dates drilled, they are not necessarily representative of the subsurface conditions between boring locations or subsurface conditions during other seasons of the year. If the scope of the project changes the recommendations may change and may require additional investigation.

During the design process, it is recommended that CTL work with the project designers to confirm that the geotechnical recommendations are properly incorporated into the final plans and specifications, and to assist with establishing criteria for the construction observation and testing. CTL is not responsible for independent conclusions, opinions and recommendations made by others based on the data and the recommendations provided in this report. The report was prepared by CTL Engineering, Inc. (Consultant) solely for the use of the Client in accordance with an executed contract. The Client’s use of or reliance on this report is limited by the terms and conditions of the contract and by the qualifications and limitations stated in the report. It is also acknowledged that the Client’s use of and reliance of this report is limited for reasons which include: actual site conditions that may change with time; hidden conditions, not discoverable within the scope of the assessment, may exist at the site; and the scope of the investigation may have been limited by time, budget and other constraints imposed by the Client. Neither the report, nor its contents, conclusions nor recommendations are intended for the use of any party other than the Client. Consultant and the Client assume no liability for any reliance placed on this report by such party. The rights of the Client under contract may not be assigned to any person or entity, without the consent of the Consultant which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.

Geotechnical Investigation Roadway Reconstruction, CR N 500 E in Newton County, IN CTL Project No.: 19050128IND January 27, 2020 Page 9

This geotechnical report does not address the environmental conditions of the site. The Consultant is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts that were concealed, withheld, or not fully disclosed at the time the assessment was conducted.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Consultant and Client agree to indemnify and hold each other, and their officers and employees harmless from and against claims, damages, losses and expenses arising out of unknown or concealed conditions. Furthermore, neither the Consultant nor its employees shall be liable to the Owner in an amount in excess of the available professional liability insurance coverage of the Consultant. In addition, Client and Consultant agree neither shall be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages of any kind or nature.

The Consultant’s services have been provided consistent with its professional standard of care. No other warranties are made, either expressed or implied.

Sincerely, CTL ENGINEERING, INC. Ali Karaki, P.E. Pawan Sigdel, PhD, EIT Principal Engineer Project Engineer

APPENDIX A

GENERAL SITE PLAN BORING LOCATION PLANS

Bor

ing

Loca

tio P

lan

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

NN

ewto

n C

ount

y, IN

Lege

nd

Sta

tion

(Lin

e '7

00 N

')

Sta

tion

(Lin

e '5

00 E

ast')

Test

Bor

ings

900

ft

N

➤➤

201

9 G

oogl

e

© 2

019

Goo

gle

© 2

019

Goo

gle

Bor

ing

Loca

tio P

lan

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

NN

ewto

n C

ount

y, IN

Lege

nd

Sta

tion

(Lin

e '7

00 N

')

Sta

tion

(Lin

e '5

00 E

ast')

Test

Bor

ings

900

ft

N

➤➤

201

9 G

oogl

e

© 2

019

Goo

gle

© 2

019

Goo

gle

Bor

ing

Loca

tio P

lan

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

NN

ewto

n C

ount

y, IN

Lege

nd

Sta

tion

(Lin

e '7

00 N

')

Sta

tion

(Lin

e '5

00 E

ast')

Test

Bor

ings

900

ft

N

➤➤

201

9 G

oogl

e

© 2

019

Goo

gle

© 2

019

Goo

gle

APPENDIX B

TEST BORING RECORDS

SOIL DESCRIPTION

NON-COHESIVE STANDARD PENETRATION SOIL DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTS PER FOOT (BPF)

Very Loose ............................................................................ 0 - 5 Loose ................................................................................. 6 - 10 Medium Dense ................................................................... 11 - 30 Dense ............................................................................... 31 - 50 Very Dense ..................................................................... Over 50

COHESIVE SOIL STANDARD PENETRATION DESCRIPTION BLOWCOUNTS PER FOOT (BPF)

Very Soft ............................................................................... 0 - 3 Soft ................................................................................... 4 - 5 Medium Stiff ....................................................................... 6 - 10 Stiff ............................................................................... 11 - 15 Very Stiff ........................................................................... 16 - 30 Hard ............................................................................ Over 30

GRADATION COMPONENT SIZE

Boulders ..................................................................... Retained on 8" Cobbles .................................................... Passing 8" Retained on 3" Gravel ................................................... Passing 3" Retained on #10 Sand ............................................. Passing #10 Retained on #200 Silt ..........................................................0.075 mm to 0.002 mm Clay ......................................................... Smaller than 0.002 mm

MOISTURE TERMS DESCRIPTION

Dry ................................................................................. Powdery Slightly Moist .................................................... Below Plastic Limit Moist ................................................ Above Plastic, Below Liquid Very Moist ......................................................................... At Liquid Wet ....................................................................... Above Liquid

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

NP

NP

NP

NP

100

100

100

100

67

677.1

673.3

671.8

667.8

9.0

14.0

20.2

27.2

24.0

CRUSHED STONE (8") with Asphalt (Visual)

Brown and Gray, Moist to Very Moist, MediumDense to Loose, SANDA-2-4 (0), Lab 1

Brown, Wet, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Gray, Wet, Very Loose to Loose, SANDA-2-4 (0), Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

NP

NP

0.7

4.5

6.0

10.0

699

643

334

223

234

18

7

7

5

7

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 6.0 feet At completion 4.7 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.7 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW30° FOvercast

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.8 Feet41.086315-87.295015

4.5 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet100+1816.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 1:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

19

NP

6

NP

100

100

100

100

56

677.1

675.6

674.1

671.6

667.6

13.8

27.1

22.3

22.3

22.6

CRUSHED STONE (6") (Visual)

Brown and Gray, Moist, Medium Dense, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown, Moist, Loose, SANDY LOAMA-2-4 (0), Lab 3

Brown, Very Moist to Wet, Medium Dense to VeryLoose, SANDA-2-4 (0), Lab 4

Gray, Wet, Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

24

NP

0.5

2.0

3.5

6.0

10.0

767

324

568

422

522

13

6

14

4

4

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 3.6 feet At completion 2.9 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

12-30-19

12-31-19

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 3.6 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW30° FOvercast

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.6 Feet41.087642-87.294936

2.8 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet105+0010.0 feet Rt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 2:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

78

100

100

100

100

677.1

674.1

671.6

667.6

11.4

28.2

25.8

26.3

21.8

CRUSHED STONE (6") (Visual)

Gray and Brown, Moist, Loose to Very Loose,SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown, Wet, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Gray, Wet, Loose to Medium Dense, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.5

3.5

6.0

10.0

454

322

333

355

458

9

4

6

10

13

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 3.6 feet At completion 2.7 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

12-30-19

12-31-19

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.1 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW25° FOvercast

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.6 Feet41.089012-87.295031

2.7 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet110+0010.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 3:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

67

100

677.7

677.2

672.4

668.4

7.9

16.7

18.1

20.8

24.2

CRUSHED STONE (8") (Visual)

Gray, Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown, Moist to Wet, Very Loose to Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Brown, Wet, Very Loose to Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.7

1.2

6.0

10.0

444

323

333

101

334

8

5

6

1

7

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 5.0 feet At completion Dry

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

12-30-19

12-31-19

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.1 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW25° FOvercast

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

678.4 Feet41.090453-87.295003

Dry After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet115+259.0 feet Rt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 4:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

100

100

677.6

675.4

671.9

669.9

667.9

13.6

19.2

23.5

24.6

22.0

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Gray, Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Gray and Brown, Wet, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Brown and Gray, Wet, Loose to Medium Dense,SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Brown, Wet, Medium Dense, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.3

2.5

6.0

8.0

10.0

643

433

445

455

568

7

6

9

10

14

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 5.0 feet At completion 3.6 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

12-30-19

12-31-19

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 3.7 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW30° FOvercast

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.9 Feet41.091757-87.295072

3.6 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet120+0010.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 5:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

100

100

676.9

673.4

671.9

667.4

13.3

17.7

17.1

25.1

27.1

CRUSHED STONE (6")

Black, Moist to Very Moist, Loose to Very Loose,SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown, Wet, Very Loose to Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Gray and Brown, Wet, Very Loose to Loose,SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.5

4.0

5.5

10.0

445

313

335

223

324

9

4

8

5

6

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 3.6 feet At completion 3.6 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 3.6 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW35° FSunny

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.4 Feet41.093129-87.295009

2.8 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet125+009.0 feet Rt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 6:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

100

100

677.5

674.8

667.8

11.7

16.3

4.7

24.3

23.3

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Black, Moist to Very Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Gray, Wet, Loose to Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.3

3.0

10.0

655

334

332

213

324

10

7

5

4

6

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 4.0 feet At completion 3.1 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 3.9 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW35° FSunny

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.8 Feet41.094502-87.295089

3.8 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet130+009.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 7:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

100

100

678.4

676.8

672.8

668.8

11.9

14.4

18.0

26.6

21.3

CRUSHED STONE (5") (Visual)

Black and Gray, Moist, Medium Dense, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Gray and Brown, Wet, Loose to Medium Dense,SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Brown and Gray, Wet, Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.4

2.0

6.0

10.0

365

344

356

101

223

11

8

11

1

5

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 5.0 feet At completion 4.1 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.9 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW35° FSunny

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

678.8 Feet41.095873-87.295032

4.8 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet135+009.0 feet Rt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 8:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

78

100

679.7

678.2

674.2

670.2

16.3

11.3

13.0

25.9

27.7

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Black and Gray, Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Gray, Moist to Very Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Brown and Gray, Wet, Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.5

2.0

6.0

10.0

455

446

446

223

122

10

10

10

5

4

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 6.0 feet At completion 6.3 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 6.5 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW35° FSunny

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

680.2 Feet41.097248-87.295121

6.3 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet140+0010.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB- 9:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

67

100

679.3

675.1

669.6

9.9

14.1

23.0

27.9

20.4

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Black and Gray, Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Gray, Wet, Very Loose to Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.3

4.5

10.0

335

333

324

212

345

8

6

6

3

9

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 5.0 feet At completion 4.5 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.6 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW35° FOvercast

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

679.6 Feet41.098715-87.295054

4.4 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet145+3512.0 feet Rt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB-10:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

100

100

679.3

676.6

669.6

17.1

15.7

23.5

25.1

24.4

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Brown, Moist, Loose to Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Gray and Brown, Moist to Wet, Very Loose toMedium Dense, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.3

3.0

10.0

654

312

223

346

467

9

3

5

10

13

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 4.6 feet At completion Dry

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-08-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.4 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW15° FSunny

:

:

5 hours

LatitudeLongitude

679.6 Feet41.09999-87.295145

Dry After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet150+009.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB-11:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

56

100

679.3

676.6

675.6

669.6

15.4

12.7

26.3

24.7

23.2

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Black and Gray, Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown, Moist, Loose to Very Loose, SANDYLOAM (Visual)

Brown, Moist to Wet, Very Loose to MediumDense, SAND with Traces of Clay in SS-3BA-2-4, As Lab 4

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.3

3.0

4.0

10.0

444

333

221

223

5710

8

6

3

5

17

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 6.6 feet At completion Dry

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-08-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 5.0 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW15° FSunny

:

:

4 hours

LatitudeLongitude

679.6 Feet41.100897-87.295068

Dry After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet153+3215.0 feet Rt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB-12:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

44

56

67

100

100

678.9

676.2

674.7

669.2

9.2

12.1

13.6

20.0

22.0

CRUSHED STONE (4") (Visual)

Black and Gray, Moist, Loose to Very Loose,SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown and Gray, Moist, Very Loose to MediumDense, SANDY LOAMA-2-4, As Lab 3

Brown, Wet, Medium Dense, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 4

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.3

3.0

4.5

10.0

655

332

456

457

4511

10

5

11

12

16

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 6.0 feet At completion Dry

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-08-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 4.5 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW15° FSunny

:

:

3 hours

LatitudeLongitude

679.2 Feet41.100974-87.296308

Dry After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet22+008.0 feet Lt''700 North''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB-13:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

100

100

100

100

100

680.5

673.9

670.9

6.9

4.2

14.9

19.4

23.6

CRUSHED STONE (5") (Visual)

Brown, Moist to Wet, Loose to Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 5

Brown, Wet, Very Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 2

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

0.4

7.0

10.0

434

434

322

223

112

7

7

4

5

3

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 6.6 feet At completion 6.7 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-08-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 6.7 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW20° FSunny

:

:

2 hours

LatitudeLongitude

680.9 Feet41.1009-87.291948

6.6 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet29+008.0 feet Lt''700 North''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB-14:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

NP NP100

100

100

100

100

683.6

682.0

680.0

674.0

3.8

25.6

7.1

14.0

18.1

CRUSHED STONE (5") (Visual)

Brown, Moist, Medium Dense, SANDA-2-4 (0), Lab 5

Gray, Moist, Very Loose to Loose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 1

Brown and Gray, Moist to Wet, Loose to VeryLoose, SANDA-2-4, As Lab 5

Bottom of Boring at 10.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

NP

0.4

2.0

4.0

10.0

566

522

324

344

323

12

4

6

8

5

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 9.0 feet At completion Dry

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-08-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 7.3 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW20° FSunny

:

:

1 hours

LatitudeLongitude

684.0 Feet41.100962-87.293764

Dry After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

10.0 feet34+009.0 feet Rt''700 North''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

RB-15:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

NP

NP

NP

NP

100

78

100

100

100

100

673.3

662.8

5.7

22.9

24.2

21.1

20.5

21.6

Brown, Moist, Loose, SANDA-2-4 (0), Lab 6

Brown and Gray, Wet, Loose to Medium Dense,SANDA-2-4 (0), Lab 7

(Heaving Sand at 12.5 feet).

Bottom of Boring at 15.0 feet

Boring backfilled in accordance with INDOTrequirements and pavement restored with concretepatch.

NP

NP

4.5

15.0

644

333

456

679

565

776

8

6

11

16

11

13

:

:

:

COUNTY

PROJECT NO.

DATE STARTED

DATE COMPLETED

CTL PROJECT NO

GROUNDWATER:

:::::

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

N/A

ROUTE NO.

LOCATION

DES NO.

Encountered at 4.6 feet At completion 3.4 feet

Newton

190086

HSA

CME-550 ATV

3.25" I.D.

---

01-07-20

01-08-20

19050128IND

::::

Boring ElevationBoring Elevation Boring Depth HammerHammer EfficiencyDriller/InspectorTemperatureWeather

Caved in at 3.6 feet

:

:

:

:::

StationOffsetLine

Automatic90.7JS/DW30° FSunny

:

:

24 hours

LatitudeLongitude

677.8 Feet41.092537-87.295089

2.8 feet After

:

:

:

:

Boring Method

Rig Type

Casing Diameter

Core Size

15.0 feet122+8515.0 feet Lt''500 East''

Sam

ple

Dep

th

Un

con

fin

edC

om

pre

ssio

n

(ks

f)

Mo

istu

reC

on

ten

t (%

)

AtterbergLimits

PI

SOIL/MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Str

atu

mE

leva

tio

n

Str

atu

mD

epth

SP

T p

er 1

2"

Rec

ove

ry

(%

)

LLTo

tal U

nit

Wei

gh

t (p

cf)

PLSam

ple

Nu

mb

er

SP

T p

er 6

"

Hollow Stem AugerSolid Flight AugerRock CoringMud DrillingWash DrillingHand Auger

1

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

Roadway Reconstruction

TB- 1:

:

2.5

5.0

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

17.5

20.0

SSSTCRBSACSBS

------

------

SAMPLING METHOD*LLPLPIDCP

Split Spoon SampleShelby Tube SampleRock Core SampleBag SampleAuger CuttingsSubbase Sample

HSASFARCMDWDHA

ABBREVIATIONS

BORING NO.

SHEET OF1

BORING METHODHand PenetrometerLiquid LimitPlastic LimitPlasticity IndexDynamic ConePenetrometer Test

-----

TEST BORING RECORD:

:

CLIENT

PROJECT

INDOT_TEST BORING RECORD_LL_SO 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_DATA TEMPLATE.GDT

CTL Engineering, Inc.

Phone: 317-295-8650

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY TESTING

Summary of Classification Test Results Grain Size Distribution Curves

Topsoil Analysis Results Summary of Special Laboratory Test Results

Lab

1R

B-

1S

S-2

2.0-

3.5

SA

ND

A-2

-4 (

0)1.

784

.410

.43.

5N

PN

PN

P14

.0

Lab

2R

B-

1S

S-4

6.0-

7.5

SA

ND

A-2

-4 (

0)0.

083

.016

.10.

9N

PN

PN

P27

.2

Lab

3R

B-

2S

S-2

2.0-

3.5

SA

ND

Y L

OA

MA

-2-4

(0)

0.0

70.7

14.7

14.6

24.4

18.5

5.9

27.1

Lab

4R

B-

2S

S-3

3.5-

5.0

SA

ND

A-2

-4 (

0)0.

083

.016

.10.

9N

PN

PN

P22

.3

Lab

5R

B-1

5S

S-1

0.5-

2.0

SA

ND

A-2

-4 (

0)0.

084

.513

.71.

8N

PN

PN

P3.

8

Lab

6T

B-

1S

S-1

1.0-

2.5

SA

ND

A-2

-4 (

0)9.

077

.911

.61.

6N

PN

PN

P5.

7

Lab

7T

B-

1S

S-3

6.0-

7.5

SA

ND

A-2

-4 (

0)0.

084

.913

.41.

7N

PN

PN

P24

.2

Lab

10T

S-1

TS

-10.

0-5.

01.

081

.215

.82.

018

.8

Lab

11T

S-2

TS

-10.

0-5.

04.

179

.99.

86.

212

.3

Lab

12T

S-3

TS

-10.

0-5.

024

.564

.19.

02.

511

.9

Lab

13T

S-4

TS

-10.

0-5.

028

.258

.911

.81.

114

.2

Pla

stic

ityIn

dex

(PI)

Moi

stur

e%

Pla

stic

Lim

it(P

L)

Liqu

idLi

mit

(LL)

San

d%

Silt %

Cla

y%

Gra

vel

%A

AS

HT

OC

lass

ifica

tion

Tex

tura

lC

lass

ifica

tion

Dep

th(f

eet)

Sam

ple

No.

She

et 1

of

1

Lab

No.

Bor

ing

No.

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F C

LA

SS

IFIC

AT

ION

TE

ST

RE

SU

LT

S

: : :1900

86

New

ton

1905

0128

IND

Pro

ject

No.

Cou

nty

CT

L P

roj.

No.

Des

. No.

Pro

ject

Typ

e

Rou

te

Loca

tion

: : : :N/A

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

CT

L E

ngin

eerin

g, In

c.P

hone

: 31

7-29

5-86

50

INDOT_SUMMARY_CLASSIFICATION TESTING 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_4.GDT 1/15/20

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

14.0

2.0-3.5

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

RB- 1

84.4

NP

50

Classification

0.041

Easting

10.4

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 1

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.202

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

4.97

1.7

SAND

SS-2

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.37

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.1060.163

30

3.5

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

9.525

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

27.2

6.0-7.5

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

RB- 1

83.0

NP

50

Classification

0.045

Easting

16.1

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 2

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.185

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

4.12

0.0

SAND

SS-4

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.17

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.0980.15

30

0.9

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

2

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

27.1

2.0-3.5

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

RB- 2

70.7

5.9

50

Classification

Easting

14.7

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 3

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.162

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

0.0

SAND

SS-2

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

24.4 18.5

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SANDY LOAM

%Clay

6 3

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.0760.126

30

14.6

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

4.75

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

22.3

3.5-5.0

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

RB- 2

83.0

NP

50

Classification

0.045

Easting

16.1

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 4

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.185

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

4.14

0.0

SAND

SS-3

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.18

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.0990.15

30

0.9

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

4.75

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

3.8

0.5-2.0

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

RB-15

84.5

NP

50

Classification

0.045

Easting

13.7

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 5

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.193

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

4.29

0.0

SAND

SS-1

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.20

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.1020.156

30

1.8

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

2

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

5.7

1.0-2.5

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

TB- 1

77.9

NP

50

Classification

0.052

Easting

11.5

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 6

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.223

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

4.29

9.0

SAND

SS-1

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.06

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.1110.177

30

1.6

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

19

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

24.2

6.0-7.5

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

TB- 1

84.9

NP

50

Classification

0.045

Easting

13.4

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 7

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.19

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

4.25

0.0

SAND

SS-3

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.23

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.1020.154

30

1.7

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

2

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

18.8

0.0-5.0

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

TS-1

81.2

NP

50

Classification

0.032

Easting

15.8

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 10

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.189

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

5.84

1.0

SAND

TS-1

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

1.56

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.0980.152

30

2.0

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

19

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

12.3

0.0-5.0

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

TS-2

79.9

NP

50

Classification

0.009

Easting

9.8

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 11

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.203

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

22.22

4.1

SAND

TS-1

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

5.70

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.1030.162

30

6.2

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

19

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

11.9

0.0-5.0

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

TS-3

64.1

NP

50

Classification

0.058

Easting

8.9

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 12

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.351

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

6.01

24.5

SAND

TS-1

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

0.89

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.1350.255

30

2.5

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

25.4

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.0010.010.1110100

60

A-2-4(0)

14.2

0.0-5.0

D50

3/81.5 14

HYDROMETER

4 16

TS-4

58.9

NP

50

Classification

0.055

Easting

11.8

PE

RC

EN

T F

INE

R B

Y W

EIG

HT

Lab 13

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

1001

LL

D60

200

D30

0.34

D100 %Sand

Boring No.

406

6.12

28.2

SAND

TS-1

3/4

PL

COBBLES

10

fineSILT

3

Sample

GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

NP NP

Remarks

Cu

D10

Depth

GRAVEL CLAY

SAND

%Clay

6 3

0.89

U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS

0.130.246

30

1.1

4

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES

Northing

8

Cc

2

MC

19

%Silt

coarse

%Gravel

PI

1401/2 20

:

:

:

:

:CTL Engineering, Inc.Phone: 317-295-8650

Des No.

County

Client

Route

Location

N/A

Newton

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLC

CR N 500 E

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700

INDOT_GRADATION_NE 19050128IND.GPJ

Rev

11/

17D

ate:

Des

. No.

:Pr

ojec

t:Lo

catio

n:

REF

.A

ASH

TO T

28

9

AA

SHTO

T 88

and

T

89

AA

SHTO

T 88

and

T

89

AA

SHTO

T 88

and

T

89

AA

SHTO

T 88

and

T

89

AA

SHTO

T 26

7 an

d

T 21

**

Bra

y P-

1 Eq

uiva

lent

NC

RR

P 22

1,

Cha

pt 7

***

Gra

vel*

Sand

Silt

Cla

y

TS-1

100+

1816

Rt

27.

01

8116

23.

483

103

TS-2

122+

8515

Lt2

7.5

480

106

2.5

4748

TS-3

153+

3215

Rt

27.

125

649

32.

982

56TS

-422

+00

8Lt

26.

728

5912

13.

030

68

6.0

- 7.3

N/A

5 - 5

0%30

- 80

%5

- 30%

3 - 1

0%**

20 -

8010

5 - 2

50

* **In

Dav

ies,

Gib

son,

Kno

x, P

ike

Pose

y, a

nd V

ande

rbur

gh C

ount

ies,

AA

SHTO

T 2

1 sh

all a

lso

be p

erfo

rmed

. A

ccep

tabl

e ra

nge

is 4

- 10

%**

*N

orth

Cen

tral R

egio

nal R

esea

rch

Publ

icat

ion

221,

Cha

pter

7

Bor

ing

Log

Stat

ion

(% b

y W

eigh

t)

pH

LOC

ATI

ON

Org

anic

C

onte

nt

(%

by

Wt)

IND

IAN

A D

EPA

RTM

ENT

OF

TRA

NSP

OR

TATI

ON

1/13

/202

0N

/AR

oadw

ay R

econ

stru

ctio

nC

R N

500

E fr

om C

R E

600

N to

CR

E 7

00 N

AN

ALY

SIS

OFF

ICE

OF

GEO

TEC

HN

ICA

L SE

RV

ICES

Sum

mar

y of

Exi

stin

g To

psoi

l Tes

t Res

ults

for u

se w

ith P

lant

Gro

wth

Lay

er

Not

e: A

ll ex

istin

g to

psoi

l tes

t res

ults

pre

sent

ed h

erei

n ar

e fo

r inf

orm

atio

n on

ly.

For i

nfor

mat

iona

l pur

pose

s onl

y

Acc

epta

ble

Ran

ges p

er 9

14.0

1 =

Off

set

(fee

t)Lt

/Rt

Test

ed

Dep

th

(inch

)

Phos

phor

us

(ppm

)Po

tass

ium

(ppm

)

RB

- 1

SS

-10.

5-2.

09.

0

RB

- 1

SS

-22.

0-3.

514

.07.

1

RB

- 1

SS

-33.

5-5.

020

.2

RB

- 1

SS

-46.

0-7.

527

.27.

0

RB

- 1

SS

-58.

5-10

.024

.0

RB

- 2

SS

-10.

5-2.

013

.83.

80.

8

RB

- 2

SS

-22.

0-3.

527

.112

07.

3

RB

- 2

SS

-33.

5-5.

022

.37.

6

RB

- 2

SS

-46.

0-7.

522

.3

RB

- 2

SS

-58.

5-10

.022

.6

RB

- 3

SS

-10.

5-2.

011

.43.

21.

3

RB

- 3

SS

-22.

0-3.

528

.2

RB

- 3

SS

-33.

5-5.

025

.8

RB

- 3

SS

-46.

0-7.

526

.3

RB

- 3

SS

-58.

5-10

.021

.8

RB

- 4

SS

-10.

5-2.

07.

9

RB

- 4

SS

-22.

0-3.

516

.7

RB

- 4

SS

-33.

5-5.

018

.1

RB

- 4

SS

-46.

0-7.

520

.8

RB

- 4

SS

-58.

5-10

.024

.2

RB

- 5

SS

-10.

5-2.

013

.62.

70.

9

RB

- 5

SS

-22.

0-3.

519

.2

RB

- 5

SS

-33.

5-5.

023

.5

RB

- 5

SS

-46.

0-7.

524

.6

RB

- 5

SS

-58.

5-10

.022

.0

RB

- 6

SS

-10.

5-2.

013

.33.

50.

6

Dep

thS

ampl

eB

orin

g

She

et 1

of

4W

etD

ensi

ty(p

cf)

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)@

Opt

.pH

Cal

cium

Car

bona

te(%

)LO

I(%

)P

otas

sium

(ppm

)M

oist

ure

%

Max

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)Q

u(k

sf)

c(k

sf)

Opt

imum

Moi

stur

e%

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F S

PE

CIA

L L

AB

OR

AT

OR

Y T

ES

T R

ES

UL

TS

In-s

itu+

2% o

f O

pt.

Res

ilien

tM

odul

usP

hosp

horu

s(p

pm)

Sul

fate

(ppm

)

: : :1900

86

New

ton

1905

0128

IND

Pro

ject

No.

Cou

nty

CT

L P

roj.

No.

Des

. No.

Pro

ject

Typ

e

Rou

te

Loca

tion

: : : :N/A

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

CT

L E

ngin

eerin

g, In

c.P

hone

: 31

7-29

5-86

50

INDOT_SUMMARY_SPECIAL TESTING 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_4.GDT 1/24/20

RB

- 6

SS

-22.

0-3.

517

.7

RB

- 6

SS

-33.

5-5.

017

.1

RB

- 6

SS

-46.

0-7.

525

.1

RB

- 6

SS

-58.

5-10

.027

.1

RB

- 7

SS

-10.

5-2.

011

.7

RB

- 7

SS

-22.

0-3.

516

.3

RB

- 7

SS

-33.

5-5.

04.

7

RB

- 7

SS

-46.

0-7.

524

.3

RB

- 7

SS

-58.

5-10

.023

.3

RB

- 8

SS

-10.

5-2.

011

.9

RB

- 8

SS

-22.

0-3.

514

.4

RB

- 8

SS

-33.

5-5.

018

.0

RB

- 8

SS

-46.

0-7.

526

.6

RB

- 8

SS

-58.

5-10

.021

.3

RB

- 9

SS

-10.

5-2.

016

.3

RB

- 9

SS

-22.

0-3.

511

.3

RB

- 9

SS

-33.

5-5.

013

.0

RB

- 9

SS

-46.

0-7.

525

.9

RB

- 9

SS

-58.

5-10

.027

.7

RB

-10

SS

-10.

5-2.

09.

9

RB

-10

SS

-22.

0-3.

514

.1

RB

-10

SS

-33.

5-5.

023

.0

RB

-10

SS

-46.

0-7.

527

.9

RB

-10

SS

-58.

5-10

.020

.4

RB

-11

SS

-10.

5-2.

017

.14.

00.

9

RB

-11

SS

-22.

0-3.

515

.7

Dep

thS

ampl

eB

orin

g

She

et 2

of

4W

etD

ensi

ty(p

cf)

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)@

Opt

.pH

Cal

cium

Car

bona

te(%

)LO

I(%

)P

otas

sium

(ppm

)M

oist

ure

%

Max

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)Q

u(k

sf)

c(k

sf)

Opt

imum

Moi

stur

e%

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F S

PE

CIA

L L

AB

OR

AT

OR

Y T

ES

T R

ES

UL

TS

In-s

itu+

2% o

f O

pt.

Res

ilien

tM

odul

usP

hosp

horu

s(p

pm)

Sul

fate

(ppm

)

: : :1900

86

New

ton

1905

0128

IND

Pro

ject

No.

Cou

nty

CT

L P

roj.

No.

Des

. No.

Pro

ject

Typ

e

Rou

te

Loca

tion

: : : :N/A

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

CT

L E

ngin

eerin

g, In

c.P

hone

: 31

7-29

5-86

50

INDOT_SUMMARY_SPECIAL TESTING 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_4.GDT 1/24/20

RB

-11

SS

-33.

5-5.

023

.5

RB

-11

SS

-46.

0-7.

525

.1

RB

-11

SS

-58.

5-10

.024

.4

RB

-12

SS

-10.

5-2.

015

.4

RB

-12

SS

-22.

0-3.

512

.7

RB

-12

SS

-33.

5-5.

026

.3

RB

-12

SS

-46.

0-7.

524

.7

RB

-12

SS

-58.

5-10

.023

.2

RB

-13

SS

-10.

5-2.

09.

2

RB

-13

SS

-22.

0-3.

512

.1

RB

-13

SS

-33.

5-5.

013

.6

RB

-13

SS

-46.

0-7.

520

.0

RB

-13

SS

-58.

5-10

.022

.0

RB

-14

SS

-10.

5-2.

06.

9

RB

-14

SS

-22.

0-3.

54.

2

RB

-14

SS

-33.

5-5.

014

.9

RB

-14

SS

-46.

0-7.

519

.4

RB

-14

SS

-58.

5-10

.023

.6

RB

-15

SS

-10.

5-2.

03.

87.

4

RB

-15

SS

-22.

0-3.

525

.6

RB

-15

SS

-33.

5-5.

07.

1

RB

-15

SS

-46.

0-7.

514

.0

RB

-15

SS

-58.

5-10

.018

.1

TB

- 1

SS

-11.

0-2.

55.

712

07.

2

TB

- 1

SS

-23.

5-5.

022

.9

TB

- 1

SS

-36.

0-7.

524

.27.

4

Dep

thS

ampl

eB

orin

g

She

et 3

of

4W

etD

ensi

ty(p

cf)

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)@

Opt

.pH

Cal

cium

Car

bona

te(%

)LO

I(%

)P

otas

sium

(ppm

)M

oist

ure

%

Max

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)Q

u(k

sf)

c(k

sf)

Opt

imum

Moi

stur

e%

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F S

PE

CIA

L L

AB

OR

AT

OR

Y T

ES

T R

ES

UL

TS

In-s

itu+

2% o

f O

pt.

Res

ilien

tM

odul

usP

hosp

horu

s(p

pm)

Sul

fate

(ppm

)

: : :1900

86

New

ton

1905

0128

IND

Pro

ject

No.

Cou

nty

CT

L P

roj.

No.

Des

. No.

Pro

ject

Typ

e

Rou

te

Loca

tion

: : : :N/A

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

CT

L E

ngin

eerin

g, In

c.P

hone

: 31

7-29

5-86

50

INDOT_SUMMARY_SPECIAL TESTING 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_4.GDT 1/24/20

TB

- 1

SS

-48.

5-10

.021

.1

TB

- 1

SS

-511

.0-1

2.5

20.5

TB

- 1

SS

-613

.5-1

5.0

21.6

TS

-1T

S-1

0.0-

5.0

18.8

8310

33.

47.

0

TS

-2T

S-1

0.0-

5.0

12.3

4748

2.5

7.5

TS

-3T

S-1

0.0-

5.0

11.9

8256

2.9

7.1

TS

-4T

S-1

0.0-

5.0

14.2

3068

3.0

6.7

Dep

thS

ampl

eB

orin

g

She

et 4

of

4W

etD

ensi

ty(p

cf)

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)@

Opt

.pH

Cal

cium

Car

bona

te(%

)LO

I(%

)P

otas

sium

(ppm

)M

oist

ure

%

Max

Dry

Den

sity

(pcf

)Q

u(k

sf)

c(k

sf)

Opt

imum

Moi

stur

e%

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F S

PE

CIA

L L

AB

OR

AT

OR

Y T

ES

T R

ES

UL

TS

In-s

itu+

2% o

f O

pt.

Res

ilien

tM

odul

usP

hosp

horu

s(p

pm)

Sul

fate

(ppm

)

: : :1900

86

New

ton

1905

0128

IND

Pro

ject

No.

Cou

nty

CT

L P

roj.

No.

Des

. No.

Pro

ject

Typ

e

Rou

te

Loca

tion

: : : :N/A

Roa

dway

Rec

onst

ruct

ion

CR

N 5

00 E

CR

N 5

00 E

from

CR

E 6

00 N

to C

R E

700

CT

L E

ngin

eerin

g, In

c.P

hone

: 31

7-29

5-86

50

INDOT_SUMMARY_SPECIAL TESTING 19050128IND.GPJ INDOT_4.GDT 1/24/20

APPENDIX D

SOIL PROFILES

662

664

666

668

670

672

674

676

678

680

10,000 10,200 10,400 10,600 10,800 11,000 11,200 11,400 11,600 11,800 12,000 12,200 12,400662

664

666

668

670

672

674

676

678

680

GROUND WATER ATCOMPLETION OF DRILLING

GROUNDWATER AT "N"HOURS AFTER COMPLETION

PERCENT MOISTURECONTENT(w)

STANDARD PENETRATION INBLOWS PER FOOT (N)

PERCENT ROCK CORERECOVERY

ROCK QUALITYDESIGNATION (%)

W%

REC

RQDSheet

Scale

Drawn By

Reviewed By19050128IND

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLCRoadway Reconstruction

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700Newton County, Indiana

Des. No.: N/A

LEGENDSand &Gravel Sand Sandy

Loam

CAVED IN DEPTH

N GROUNDWATER DURINGDRILLING As Shown

Date1/17/20

1CTL Project No.:

GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE

Ele

vati

on

IND

OT

_SO

190

501

28IN

D.G

PJ

IND

OT

_DA

TA

TE

MP

LAT

E.G

DT

1/1

7/2

0

CTL Engineering, Inc.www.ctleng.com

9%

14%

20%

27%

24%

18

7

7

5

7

0.7

4.5

6.0

10.0

RB- 1100+18

16' Lt ''500 East''677.8

14%

27%

22%

22%

23%

13

6

14

4

4

0.5

2.0

3.5

6.0

10.0

RB- 2105+00

10' Rt ''500 East''677.6

11%

28%

26%

26%

22%

9

4

6

10

13

0.5

3.5

6.0

10.0

RB- 3110+00

10' Lt ''500 East''677.6

8%

17%

18%

21%

24%

8

5

6

1

7

0.7

1.2

6.0

10.0

RB- 4115+25

9' Rt ''500 East''678.4

14%

19%

24%

25%

22%

7

6

9

10

14

0.3

2.5

6.0

8.0

10.0

RB- 5120+00

10' Lt ''500 East''677.9

6%

23%

24%

21%

21%

22%

8

6

11

16

11

13

4.5

15.0

TB- 1122+85

15' Lt ''500 East''677.8

667

668

669

670

671

672

673

674

675

676

677

678

679

680

681

12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500667

668

669

670

671

672

673

674

675

676

677

678

679

680

681

GROUND WATER ATCOMPLETION OF DRILLING

GROUNDWATER AT "N"HOURS AFTER COMPLETION

PERCENT MOISTURECONTENT(w)

STANDARD PENETRATION INBLOWS PER FOOT (N)

PERCENT ROCK CORERECOVERY

ROCK QUALITYDESIGNATION (%)

W%

REC

RQDSheet

Scale

Drawn By

Reviewed By19050128IND

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLCRoadway Reconstruction

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700Newton County, Indiana

Des. No.: N/A

LEGEND

Sand SandyLoam

CAVED IN DEPTH

N GROUNDWATER DURINGDRILLING As Shown

Date1/17/20

CTL Project No.:

GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE

Ele

vati

on

IND

OT

_SO

190

501

28IN

D.G

PJ

IND

OT

_DA

TA

TE

MP

LAT

E.G

DT

1/1

7/2

0

CTL Engineering, Inc.www.ctleng.com

13%

18%

17%

25%

27%

9

4

8

5

6

0.5

4.0

5.5

10.0

RB- 6125+00

9' Rt ''500 East''677.4

12%

16%

5%

24%

23%

10

7

5

4

6

0.3

3.0

10.0

RB- 7130+00

9' Lt ''500 East''677.8

12%

14%

18%

27%

21%

11

8

11

1

5

0.4

2.0

6.0

10.0

RB- 8135+00

9' Rt ''500 East''678.8 16%

11%

13%

26%

28%

10

10

10

5

4

0.5

2.0

6.0

10.0

RB- 9140+00

10' Lt ''500 East''680.2

10%

14%

23%

28%

20%

8

6

6

3

9

0.3

4.5

10.0

RB-10145+35

12' Rt ''500 East''679.6

17%

16%

24%

25%

24%

9

3

5

10

13

0.3

3.0

10.0

RB-11150+00

9' Lt ''500 East''679.6

15%

13%

26%

25%

23%

8

6

3

5

17

0.3

3.0

4.0

10.0

RB-12153+32

15' Rt ''500 East''679.6

2

CrushedStone

668

670

672

674

676

678

680

682

684

686

2,000 2,200 2,400 2,600 2,800 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600668

670

672

674

676

678

680

682

684

686

GROUND WATER ATCOMPLETION OF DRILLING

GROUNDWATER AT "N"HOURS AFTER COMPLETION

PERCENT MOISTURECONTENT(w)

STANDARD PENETRATION INBLOWS PER FOOT (N)

PERCENT ROCK CORERECOVERY

ROCK QUALITYDESIGNATION (%)

W%

REC

RQDSheet

Scale

Drawn By

Reviewed By19050128IND

Beam, Longest and Neff, LLCRoadway Reconstruction

CR N 500 E from CR E 600 N to CR E 700Newton County, Indiana

Des. No.: N/A

LEGEND

Sand SandyLoam

CAVED IN DEPTH

N GROUNDWATER DURINGDRILLING As Shown

Date1/17/20

CTL Project No.:

GENERALIZED SOIL PROFILE

Ele

vati

on

IND

OT

_SO

190

501

28IN

D.G

PJ

IND

OT

_DA

TA

TE

MP

LAT

E.G

DT

1/1

7/2

0

CTL Engineering, Inc.www.ctleng.com

15%

13%

26%

25%

23%

8

6

3

5

17

0.3

3.0

4.0

10.0

RB-12153+32

15' Rt ''500 East''679.6

9%

12%

14%

20%

22%

10

5

11

12

16

0.3

3.0

4.5

10.0

RB-1322+00

8' Lt ''700 North''679.2

7%

4%

15%

19%

24%

7

7

4

5

3

0.4

7.0

10.0

RB-1429+00

8' Lt ''700 North''680.9

4%

26%

7%

14%

18%

12

4

6

8

5

0.4

2.0

4.0

10.0

RB-1534+00

9' Rt ''700 North''684.0

CrushedStone

3